Battle of St. James

Last updated
Siege of St. James
Part of Hundred Years' War
Date27 February – 6 March 1426
Location 48°31′22.001″N1°19′28.999″W / 48.52277806°N 1.32472194°W / 48.52277806; -1.32472194
Result English victory
Belligerents
Duchy of Brittany
Kingdom of France
Kingdom of England
Commanders and leaders
Arthur de Richemont Sir Thomas Rempston
Strength
16,000 600
Casualties and losses
650 None or negligible
Normandie region relief location map.jpg
Red pog.svg
Location within Normandy
Relief Map of English Channel.png
Red pog.svg
Battle of St. James (English Channel)
France relief location map.jpg
Red pog.svg
Battle of St. James (France)

The siege of St. James took place between 27 February and 6 March 1426 between England and France, during the latter half of the Hundred Years' War.

Contents

Forces

Avranches on the border of Normandy and Brittany Arrondissement d Avranches.PNG
Avranches on the border of Normandy and Brittany

The battle was fought at Avranches, on the border of Normandy and Brittany, with the English led by Sir Thomas Rempston, while the French were led by Arthur de Richemont, the Constable of France. The English were victorious.

Background

In late 1425, Jean, Duke of Brittany, had switched his allegiance from the English to Charles the dauphin. In retaliation, Sir Thomas Rempston invaded the duchy with a small army in January 1426, penetrating to the capital, Rennes, [1] [2] before falling back to St. James-de-Beuvron on the Norman frontier. The duke of Brittany's brother, Arthur de Richemont, newly made constable of France, rushed to his brother's aid. Richemont hastily levied an army across Brittany in February and gathered his forces in Antrain. The newly assembled Breton force first captured Pontorson, executing all the surviving English defenders and entirely destroying the wall after seizing the city. [3] By the end of February, Richemont's army then marched on St. James. Rempston was heavily outnumbered, with 600 men to Richemont's feudal horde of 16,000. [4]

Battle

As the Breton force approached, English troops came out in reconnaissance but were soon driven back into the walls after a swift fight. [5] The constable had with him a powerful force of artillery and then proceeded to bombard the city from several sides. The bombardment lasted for a week, during which the defenders unsuccessfully tried several sorties that all ended with them retreating into the walls. [5] After several days of bombardment, two large breaches were made in the walls.

Richemont was reluctant to launch a full assault with troops of such poor quality, but he was running low on funds and his failure to pay troops had already caused some of his men to desert despite the short duration of the siege. [6] After holding a council of war with his officers, he decided to assault the walls through the two breaches.

On the 6th of March the French attacked in force. All day Rempston's troops held the breaches, but there was no let-up in the constable's assault. At some point, men from Richemont's main force mistook for enemy relief a returning detachment, that had been previously tasked by the constable to survey the other side of the city, and panic ensued among the largely ill-trained Breton militia. [7] The English defenders immediately decided to capitalize on this unexpected route and came out of the city to inflict heavy losses on the fleeing Breton troops. During the chaotic retreat, hundreds of men drowned crossing the nearby river while many others fell to the deadly bolts of the defenders' crossbows. The remnants of the disorganized feudal militia, technically defeated by an enemy 26 times their inferior, straggled back to camp, thoroughly demoralized. Any attempts Richemont may have made to rally them were unsuccessful and, in the night, they burned their tents and baggage and fell back in disorder to their point of departure near Fougres. Six hundred were dead, 50 captured, and 18 standards lost. [4] The remainder soon disbanded. [8]

Aftermath

Two days later the Earl of Suffolk arrived, bringing 1500 men. Intent on exploiting the victory, he at once set out for Rennes, 45 miles to the west. Halfway there, he captured the town of Dol without difficulty, as neither Jean nor Richemont offered resistance. Here he found he need not resume the advance, for the duke had offered a three-month truce. Suffolk agreed. After a brief outbreak of fighting next year the turncoat duke sought rapprochement with his erstwhile allies, and signed a treaty with the Duke of Bedford by which he accepted Henry VI of England as king of France. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John IV, Duke of Brittany</span> Duke of Brittany

John IV the Conqueror KG, was Duke of Brittany and Count of Montfort from 1345 until his death and 7th Earl of Richmond from 1372 until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John V, Duke of Brittany</span> Duke of Brittany from 1399 to 1442

John V, sometimes numbered as VI, bynamed John the Wise, was Duke of Brittany and Count of Montfort from 1399 to his death. His rule coincided with the height of the Hundred Years' War between England and France. John's reversals in that conflict, as well as in other internal struggles in France, served to strengthen his duchy and to maintain its independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur III, Duke of Brittany</span> Duke of Brittany

Arthur III, more commonly known as Arthur de Richemont, was briefly Duke of Brittany from 1457 until his death. He is noted primarily, however, for his role as a leading military commander during the Hundred Years' War. Although Richemont briefly sided with the English once, he otherwise remained firmly committed to the House of Valois. He fought alongside Joan of Arc, and was appointed Constable of France. His military and administrative reforms in the French state were an important factor in assuring the final defeat of the English in the Hundred Years' War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earl of Richmond</span> Title in the Peerage of England

The now-extinct title of Earl of Richmond was created many times in the Peerage of England. The earldom of Richmond was initially held by various Breton nobles; sometimes the holder was the Breton duke himself, including one member of the cadet branch of the French Capetian dynasty. The historical ties between the Duchy of Brittany and this English earldom were maintained ceremonially by the Breton dukes even after England ceased to recognize the Breton dukes as earls of England and those dukes rendered homage to the King of France, rather than the English crown. It was then held either by members of the English royal families of Plantagenet and Tudor, or English nobles closely associated with the English crown. It was eventually merged into the English crown during the reign of Henry VII of England and has been recreated as a Dukedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Formigny</span> 1450 battle of the Hundred Years War

The Battle of Formigny, fought on 15 April 1450, was a major battle of the Hundred Years' War between England and France. A decisive French victory that destroyed the last significant English field army in Normandy, it paved the way for the capture of their remaining strongholds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Morlaix</span> Battle during the Hundred Years War

The Battle of Morlaix was fought in Morlaix on 30 September 1342 between the Anglo-Breton and Franco-Breton forces in Brittany. The Anglo-Breton under English command besieged the town, but a Franco-Breton relief force arrived. The English constructed a strong defensive position. After repeated attacks, the French forced the English to retreat into the woods, and the French force then withdrew.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Caen (1346)</span> Battle during the Hundred Years War

The Battle of Caen was an assault conducted on 26 July 1346 by forces from the Kingdom of England, led by King Edward III, on the French-held town of Caen and Normandy as a part of the Hundred Years' War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Rempston (died 1458)</span> Member of the Parliament of England

Sir Thomas Rempston II was a medieval English soldier, landowner, and a leading military commander during the Hundred Years' War in France. He dedicated his career, as his father had done before him, to the service of the House of Lancaster, the ruling dynasty of England. Much of the Rempston family's fortunes were in fact owed to this. However, several ransoms contracted by Sir Thomas while campaigning in France, coupled with the fact that his long-living mother held many of his estates in dower, meant that he had to endure several financial difficulties for much of his life.

The Treaty of Amiens, signed on 13 April 1423, was a defensive agreement between Burgundy, Brittany, and England during the Hundred Years' War. The English were represented by John, Duke of Bedford, the English regent of France, the Burgundians by Duke Philip the Good himself, and the Bretons by Arthur de Richemont, on behalf of his brother the Duke of Brittany. By the agreement, all three parties acknowledged Henry VI of England as King of France, and agreed to aid each other against the Valois claimant, Charles VII. It also stipulated the marriage of Bedford and Richemont to Burgundy's sisters, in order to cement the alliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loire Campaign (1429)</span> Military campaign during the Hundred Years War

The Loire Campaign was a campaign launched by Joan of Arc during the Hundred Years' War. The Loire was cleared of all English and Burgundian troops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">French–Breton War</span>

The French–Breton War lasted from 1487 to 1491. The cause of this war was the approaching death of the Breton Duke Francis II of Brittany, who had no clear successor. If not resolved, this meant a resumption of issues from a previous War of the Breton Succession (1341–1364), which had rival claimants allying with England or France, resulting in an ambiguous peace treaty that failed to prevent future succession disputes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sieges of Vannes (1342)</span>

The sieges of Vannes of 1342 were a series of four sieges of the town of Vannes that occurred throughout 1342. Two rival claimants to the Duchy of Brittany, John of Montfort and Charles of Blois, competed for Vannes throughout this civil war from 1341 to 1365. The successive sieges ruined Vannes and its surrounding countryside. Vannes was eventually sold off in a truce between England and France, signed in January 1343 in Malestroit. Saved by an appeal of Pope Clement VI, Vannes remained in the hands of its own rulers, but ultimately resided under English control from September 1343 till the end of the war in 1365.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Tartas</span>

The siege of Tartas in Gascony was an engagement between English and French forces in the late stages of the Hundred Years' War. It was undertaken by English forces and their Gascon subjects against Charles II of Albret, a powerful nobleman in southwestern France. Albret was hostile to the English and his presence in Gascony caused much trouble to the English in the region, thereby raising the need to strike against him. The bulk of hostilities only lasted up until early 1441: the siege had dragged on inconclusively, and peace terms were agreed between the attackers and defenders. The ceasefire was extended several times until mid-1442 as both sides awaited further support from England and France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Pouancé (1432)</span>

The siege of Pouancé of 1432 was undertaken by John V, Duke of Brittany, against his nephew John II, Duke of Alençon, as part of a conflict involving the payment of a dowry. It is at times referred to as the third siege of Pouancé, in succession to other sieges in 1066 and 1379.

Gilles of Brittany was a Breton prince and Lord of Chantocé. He was the son of John V of Brittany and Joan of France, and the younger brother of the dukes Francis I and Peter II.

Events from the year 1458 in France

Lancaster's chevauchée of 1356 in Normandy was an English offensive directed by Henry, Duke of Lancaster, in northern France during 1356, as a part of the Hundred Years' War. The offensive took the form of a large mounted raid – a chevauchée – and lasted from 22 June to 13 July. During its final week the English were pursued by a much larger French army under King John II that failed to force them to battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Pontoise</span> Battle of the Hundred Years War

The siege of Pontoise took place during the Hundred Years War. French forces led by King Charles VII of France besieged and captured the last English stronghold in Île de France, eliminating the English threat to Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Breteuil</span> Siege during the Hundred Years War

The siege of Breteuil was the investment of the Norman town of Breteuil, held by partisans of Charles II, King of Navarre, by French forces. It lasted from April to about 20 August 1356. It was interrupted on 5 July when a small English army commanded by Henry, Earl of Lancaster relieved and resupplied it. The French king, John II, attempted to bring Lancaster to battle with the much larger French royal army, but Lancaster marched away and the attempt failed. John then renewed the siege of Breteuil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis de Laval</span>

Louis de Laval was a French nobleman, soldier, politician and bibliophile.

References

  1. Burne, Alfred (2014) [1956]. The Agincourt War. Foreword by Anne Curry. London: Frontline Books. ISBN   978-1-84832-765-8.
  2. Burne 2014, pp. 219–220.
  3. Cosneau, Eugène (1886). Le connétable de Richemont "(Artur de Bretagne)" 1393-1458.
  4. 1 2 Burne 2014, p. 220.
  5. 1 2 Cosneau 1886, p. 118.
  6. Cosneau 1886, p. 119.
  7. Le Vavasseur, Achille (1886). "Valeur historique de la Chronique d'Arthur de Richemont, connétable de France, duc de Bretagne (1393-1458), par Guillaume Gruel" [Historicity of the Chromic of Richemont by Guillaume Gruel]. Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes (in French). 47 (1): 525–565. doi:10.3406/bec.1886.447453.
  8. 1 2 Burne 2014, p. 221.