Beta-decay stable isobars

Last updated
Table isotopes en.svg

Beta-decay stable isobars are the set of nuclides which cannot undergo beta decay, that is, the transformation of a neutron to a proton or a proton to a neutron within the nucleus. A subset of these nuclides are also stable with regards to double beta decay or theoretically higher simultaneous beta decay, as they have the lowest energy of all isobars with the same mass number.

Contents

This set of nuclides is also known as the line of beta stability, a term already in common use in 1965. [1] [2] This line lies along the bottom of the nuclear valley of stability.

Introduction

The line of beta stability can be defined mathematically by finding the nuclide with the greatest binding energy for a given mass number, by a model such as the classical semi-empirical mass formula developed by C. F. Weizsäcker. These nuclides are local maxima in terms of binding energy for a given mass number.

β decay stable / even A
βDSOneTwoThree
2-3417
36-5866
60-7252
74-116220
118-1542125
156-192514
194-21063
212-262719
Total50765

All odd mass numbers have only one beta decay stable nuclide.

Among even mass number, five (124, 130, 136, 150, 154) have three beta-stable nuclides. None have more than three; all others have either one or two.

All primordial nuclides are beta decay stable, with the exception of 40K, 50V, 87Rb, 113Cd, 115In, 138La, 176Lu, and 187Re. In addition, 123Te and 180mTa have not been observed to decay, but are believed to undergo beta decay with an extremely long half-life (over 1015 years). (123Te can only undergo electron capture to 123Sb, whereas 180mTa can decay in both directions, to 180Hf or 180W.) Among non-primordial nuclides, there are some other cases of theoretically possible but never-observed beta decay, notably including 222Rn and 247Cm (the most stable isotopes of their elements considering all decay modes). Finally, 48Ca and 96Zr have not been observed to undergo beta decay (which is theoretically possible for both), but double beta decay is known for both.

All elements up to and including nobelium, except technetium, promethium, and mendelevium, are known to have at least one beta-stable isotope. It is known that technetium and promethium have no beta-stable isotopes; current measurement uncertainties are not enough to say whether mendelevium has them or not.

List of known beta-decay stable isobars

350 beta-decay stable nuclides are currently known. [3] [4] Theoretically predicted or experimentally observed double beta-decay is shown by arrows, i.e. arrows point towards the lightest-mass isobar. This is sometimes dominated by alpha decay or spontaneous fission, especially for the heavy elements. Possible decay modes are listed as α for alpha decay, SF for spontaneous fission, and n for neutron emission in the special case of 5He. For mass 5 there are no bound isobars at all; there are bound isobars for mass 8, but the beta-stable one 8Be is unbound. [5]

Two beta-decay stable nuclides exist for odd neutron numbers 1 (2H and 3He), 3 (5He and 6Li – the former having an extremely short half-life), 5 (9Be and 10B), 7 (13C and 14N), 55 (97Mo and 99Ru), and 85 (145Nd and 147Sm); the first four cases involve very light nuclides where odd-odd nuclides are more stable than their surrounding even-even isobars, and the last two surround the proton numbers 43 and 61 which have no beta-stable isotopes. Also, two beta-decay stable nuclides exist for odd proton numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 17, 19, 29, 31, 35, 47, 51, 63, 77, 81, and 95; the first four cases involve very light nuclides where odd-odd nuclides are more stable than their surrounding even-even isobars, and the other numbers surround the neutron numbers 19, 21, 35, 39, 45, 61, 71, 89, 115, 123, 147 which have no beta-stable isotopes. (For N = 21 the long-lived primordial 40K exists, and for N = 71 there is 123Te whose electron capture has not yet been observed, but neither are beta-stable.)

All even proton numbers 2 ≤ Z ≤ 102 have at least two beta-decay stable nuclides, with exactly two for Z = 4 (8Be and 9Be – the former having an extremely short half-life) and 6 (12C and 13C). Also, the only even neutron numbers with only one beta-decay stable nuclide are 0 (1H) and 2 (4He); at least two beta-decay stable nuclides exist for even neutron numbers in the range 4 ≤ N ≤ 160, with exactly two for N = 4 (7Li and 8Be), 6 (11B and 12C), 8 (15N and 16O), 66 (114Cd and 116Sn, noting also primordial but not beta-stable 115In), 120 (198Pt and 200Hg), and 128 (212Po and 214Rn – both very unstable to alpha decay). Seven beta-decay stable nuclides exist for the magic N = 82 (136Xe, 138Ba, 139La, 140Ce, 141Pr, 142Nd, and 144Sm) and five for N = 20 (36S, 37Cl, 38Ar, 39K, and 40Ca), 50 (86Kr, 88Sr, 89Y, 90Zr, and 92Mo, noting also primordial but not beta-stable 87Rb), 58 (100Mo, 102Ru, 103Rh, 104Pd, and 106Cd), 74 (124Sn, 126Te, 127I, 128Xe, and 130Ba), 78 (130Te, 132Xe, 133Cs, 134Ba, and 136Ce), 88 (148Nd, 150Sm, 151Eu, 152Gd, and 154Dy – the last not primordial), and 90 (150Nd, 152Sm, 153Eu, 154Gd, and 156Dy).

For A ≤ 209, the only beta-decay stable nuclides that are not primordial nuclides are 5He, 8Be, 146Sm, 150Gd, and 154Dy. (146Sm has a half-life long enough that it should barely survive as a primordial nuclide, but it has never been experimentally confirmed as such.)

Even N Odd N
Even Z Even A Odd A
Odd ZOdd AEven A
All known beta-decay stable isobars sorted by mass number
Odd AEven AOdd AEven AOdd AEven AOdd AEven A
1H2H3He4He5He (n)6Li7Li8Be (α)
9Be10B11B12C13C14N15N16O
17O18O19F20Ne21Ne22Ne23Na24Mg
25Mg26Mg27Al28Si29Si30Si31P32S
33S34S35Cl36S ← 36Ar37Cl38Ar39K40Ar ← 40Ca
41K42Ca43Ca44Ca45Sc46Ca → 46Ti47Ti48Ti [lower-alpha 1]
49Ti50Ti ← 50Cr51V52Cr53Cr54Cr ← 54Fe55Mn56Fe
57Fe58Fe ← 58Ni59Co60Ni61Ni62Ni63Cu64Ni ← 64Zn
65Cu66Zn67Zn68Zn69Ga70Zn → 70Ge71Ga72Ge
73Ge74Ge ← 74Se75As76Ge → 76Se77Se78Se ← 78Kr79Br80Se → 80Kr
81Br82Se → 82Kr83Kr84Kr ← 84Sr85Rb86Kr → 86Sr87Sr88Sr
89Y90Zr91Zr92Zr ← 92Mo93Nb94Zr → 94Mo95Mo96Mo ← 96Ru [lower-alpha 2]
97Mo98Mo → 98Ru99Ru100Mo → 100Ru101Ru102Ru ← 102Pd103Rh104Ru → 104Pd
105Pd106Pd ← 106Cd107Ag108Pd ← 108Cd109Ag110Pd → 110Cd111Cd112Cd ← 112Sn
113In114Cd → 114Sn115Sn116Cd → 116Sn117Sn118Sn119Sn120Sn ← 120Te
121Sb122Sn → 122Te123Sb124Sn → 124Te ← 124Xe125Te126Te ← 126Xe127I128Te → 128Xe
129Xe130Te → 130Xe ← 130Ba131Xe132Xe ← 132Ba133Cs134Xe → 134Ba135Ba136Xe → 136Ba ← 136Ce
137Ba138Ba ← 138Ce139La140Ce141Pr142Ce → 142Nd143Nd144Nd (α) ← 144Sm
145Nd146Nd → 146Sm (α)147Sm (α)148Nd → 148Sm (α) [lower-alpha 3] 149Sm150Nd → 150Sm ← 150Gd (α)151Eu (α)152Sm ← 152Gd (α)
153Eu154Sm → 154Gd ← 154Dy (α)155Gd156Gd ← 156Dy157Gd158Gd ← 158Dy159Tb160Gd → 160Dy
161Dy162Dy ← 162Er163Dy164Dy ← 164Er165Ho166Er167Er168Er ← 168Yb
169Tm170Er → 170Yb171Yb172Yb173Yb174Yb ← 174Hf (α)175Lu176Yb → 176Hf
177Hf178Hf179Hf180Hf ← 180W (α)181Ta182W183W184W ← 184Os (α)
185Re186W → 186Os (α)187Os188Os189Os190Os ← 190Pt (α)191Ir192Os → 192Pt
193Ir194Pt195Pt196Pt ← 196Hg197Au198Pt → 198Hg199Hg200Hg
201Hg202Hg203Tl204Hg → 204Pb205Tl206Pb207Pb208Pb
209Bi (α)210Po (α)211Po (α)212Po (α) ← 212Rn (α)213Po (α)214Po (α) ← 214Rn (α)215At (α)216Po (α) → 216Rn (α)
217Rn (α)218Rn (α) ← 218Ra (α)219Fr (α)220Rn (α) → 220Ra (α)221Ra (α)222Ra [lower-alpha 4] (α)223Ra (α)224Ra (α) ← 224Th (α)
225Ac (α)226Ra (α) → 226Th (α)227Th (α)228Th (α)229Th (α)230Th (α) ← 230U (α)231Pa (α)232Th (α) → 232U (α)
233U (α)234U (α)235U (α)236U (α) ← 236Pu (α)237Np (α)238U (α) → 238Pu (α)239Pu (α)240Pu (α)
241Am (α)242Pu (α) ← 242Cm (α)243Am (α)244Pu (α) → 244Cm (α)245Cm (α)246Cm (α)247Bk (α)248Cm (α) → 248Cf (α)
249Cf (α)250Cf (α)251Cf (α)252Cf (α) ← 252Fm (α)253Es (α)254Cf (SF) → 254Fm (α)255Fm (α)256Cf (SF) → 256Fm (SF)
257Fm (α)258Fm (SF) ← 258No (SF) [lower-alpha 5] 260Fm (SF) → 260No (SF) [lower-alpha 6] 262No (SF)
One chart of known and predicted nuclides up to Z = 149, N = 256. Black denotes the predicted beta-stability line, which is in good agreement with experimental data, though it fails to predict that Tc and Pm have no beta-stable isotope (the mass differences causing these anomalies are small). Islands of stability are predicted to center near Ds and 126, beyond which the model appears to deviate from several rules of the semi-empirical mass formula. Nuclear chart from KTUY model.svg
One chart of known and predicted nuclides up to Z = 149, N = 256. Black denotes the predicted beta-stability line, which is in good agreement with experimental data, though it fails to predict that Tc and Pm have no beta-stable isotope (the mass differences causing these anomalies are small). Islands of stability are predicted to center near Ds and 126, beyond which the model appears to deviate from several rules of the semi-empirical mass formula.

All beta-decay stable nuclides with A  209 are known to undergo alpha decay, though for some, spontaneous fission is the dominant decay mode. Cluster decay is sometimes also possible, but in all known cases it is a minor branch compared to alpha decay or spontaneous fission. Alpha decay is energetically possible for all beta-stable nuclides with A  165 with the single exception of 204Hg, but in most cases the Q-value is small enough that such decay has never been seen. [12] With the exception of 262No, no nuclides with A > 260 have been definitively identified as beta-stable. 260Fm is unconfirmed. [10] Moreover, the known beta-stable nuclei for individual masses A > 257 may not represent the complete set. [11] [13]

The general patterns of beta-stability are expected to continue into the region of superheavy elements, though the exact location of the center of the valley of stability is model dependent. It is widely believed that an island of stability exists along the beta stability line for isotopes of elements around copernicium that are stabilized by shell closures in the region; such isotopes would decay primarily through alpha decay or spontaneous fission. [14] Beyond the island of stability, various models that correctly predict many known beta-stable isotopes also predict anomalies in the beta-stability line that are unobserved in any known nuclides, such as the existence of two beta-stable nuclides with the same odd mass number. [11] [15] This is a consequence of the fact that a semi-empirical mass formula must consider shell correction and nuclear deformation, which become far more pronounced for heavy nuclides. [15] [16]

The beta-stable fully ionized nuclei (with all electrons stripped) are somewhat different. Firstly, if a proton-rich nuclide can only decay by electron capture (because the energy difference between the parent and daughter is less than 1.022  MeV, the amount of decay energy needed for positron emission), then full ionization makes decay impossible. This happens for example for 7Be. [17] Moreover, sometimes the energy difference is such that while β decay violates conservation of energy for a neutral atom, bound-state β decay (in which the decay electron remains bound to the daughter in an atomic orbital) is possible for the corresponding bare nucleus. Within the range 2 ≤ A ≤ 270, this means that 163Dy, 193Ir, 205Tl, 215At, and 243Am among beta-stable neutral nuclides cease to be beta-stable as bare nuclides, and are replaced by their daughters 163Ho, 193Pt, 205Pb, 215Rn, and 243Cm. [18]

Beta decay toward minimum mass

Beta decay generally causes nuclides to decay toward the isobar with the lowest mass (which is often, but not always, the one with highest binding energy) with the same mass number. Those with lower atomic number and higher neutron number than the minimum-mass isobar undergo beta-minus decay, while those with higher atomic number and lower neutron number undergo beta-plus decay or electron capture.

However, there are a few odd-odd nuclides between two beta-stable even-even isobars, that predominantly decay to the higher-mass of the two beta-stable isobars. For example, 40K could either undergo electron capture or positron emission to 40Ar, or undergo beta minus decay to 40Ca: both possible products are beta-stable. The former process would produce the lighter of the two beta-stable isobars, yet the latter is more common.

NuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMass
Parent Cl-36 35.96830698 K-40 39.96399848 Ag-108 107.905956 Eu-150m 149.919747
Minority decay (β+/EC)2% to S-36 35.9670807611.2% to Ar-40 39.96238312253% to Pd-108 107.90389211% to Sm-150 149.9172755
Majority decay (β−)98% to Ar-36 35.96754510689% to Ca-40 39.9625909897% to Cd-108 107.90418489% to Gd-150 149.918659
NuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMass
Parent Eu-152m1 151.9217935 Tb-158m1 157.9255315 Am-242 242.0595474
Minority decay (β+/EC)28% to Sm-152 151.91973240.01% to Gd-158 157.924103917.3% to Pu-242 242.0587426
Majority decay (β−)72% to Gd-152 151.91979100.6% to Dy-158 157.92440982.7% to Cm-242 242.0588358
NuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMassNuclideMass
Parent Pm-146 145.914696
Minority decay (β−)37% to Sm-146 145.913041
Majority decay (β+/EC)63% to Nd-146 145.9131169

Notes

  1. 48Ca is theoretically capable of beta decay to 48Sc, thus making it not a beta-stable nuclide. However, such a process has never been observed, having a partial half-life greater than 1.1+0.8
    −0.6
    ×1021 years, longer than its double beta decay half-life, meaning that double beta decay would usually occur first. [6]
  2. 96Zr is theoretically capable of beta decay to 96Nb, thus making it not a beta-stable nuclide. However, such a process has never been observed, having a partial half-life greater than 2.4×1019 years, longer than its double beta decay half-life, meaning that double beta decay would usually occur first. [7]
  3. 148Gd was previously thought to be a third beta-stable isobar for mass 148, [5] but according to current mass determinations it has a higher mass than 148Eu and can undergo electron capture. Nevertheless, the mass difference is very small (27.0 keV, even lower than likewise unseen electron capture of 123Te), and only alpha decay has been observed experimentally for 148Gd.
  4. While the AME2020 atomic mass evaluation gives 222Rn a lower mass than 222Fr, [8] implying beta stability, it is predicted that single beta decay of 222Rn is energetically possible (albeit with very low decay energy), [9] and it falls within the error margin given in AME2020. [8] Hence, 222Rn is probably not beta-stable, though only the alpha decay mode is experimentally known for that nuclide, and the search for beta decay yielded a lower partial half-life limit of 8 years. [9]
  5. While the AME2020 atomic mass evaluation gives 259Md a lower mass than 259Fm, [8] implying beta stability, the error margin between them is larger than the mass difference. [8] Hence, either 259Fm or 259Md could be beta-stable.
  6. There is no known beta-stable isobar for mass 261, although they are known for the surrounding masses 260 and 262. Various models suggest that one of the undiscovered 261Md and 261No should be beta-stable. [10] [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beta decay</span> Type of radioactive decay

In nuclear physics, beta decay (β-decay) is a type of radioactive decay in which an atomic nucleus emits a beta particle, transforming into an isobar of that nuclide. For example, beta decay of a neutron transforms it into a proton by the emission of an electron accompanied by an antineutrino; or, conversely a proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a neutrino in so-called positron emission. Neither the beta particle nor its associated (anti-)neutrino exist within the nucleus prior to beta decay, but are created in the decay process. By this process, unstable atoms obtain a more stable ratio of protons to neutrons. The probability of a nuclide decaying due to beta and other forms of decay is determined by its nuclear binding energy. The binding energies of all existing nuclides form what is called the nuclear band or valley of stability. For either electron or positron emission to be energetically possible, the energy release or Q value must be positive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stable nuclide</span> Nuclide that does not undergo radioactive decay

Stable nuclides are nuclides that are not radioactive and so do not spontaneously undergo radioactive decay. When such nuclides are referred to in relation to specific elements, they are usually termed stable isotopes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Island of stability</span> Predicted set of isotopes of relatively more stable superheavy elements

In nuclear physics, the island of stability is a predicted set of isotopes of superheavy elements that may have considerably longer half-lives than known isotopes of these elements. It is predicted to appear as an "island" in the chart of nuclides, separated from known stable and long-lived primordial radionuclides. Its theoretical existence is attributed to stabilizing effects of predicted "magic numbers" of protons and neutrons in the superheavy mass region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclide</span> Atomic species

A nuclide is a class of atoms characterized by their number of protons, Z, their number of neutrons, N, and their nuclear energy state.

In nuclear engineering, fissile material is material that can undergo nuclear fission when struck by a neutron of low energy. A self-sustaining thermal chain reaction can only be achieved with fissile material. The predominant neutron energy in a system may be typified by either slow neutrons or fast neutrons. Fissile material can be used to fuel thermal-neutron reactors, fast-neutron reactors and nuclear explosives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decay chain</span> Series of radioactive decays

In nuclear science, the decay chain refers to a series of radioactive decays of different radioactive decay products as a sequential series of transformations. It is also known as a "radioactive cascade". The typical radioisotope does not decay directly to a stable state, but rather it decays to another radioisotope. Thus there is usually a series of decays until the atom has become a stable isotope, meaning that the nucleus of the atom has reached a stable state.

Naturally occurring europium (63Eu) is composed of two isotopes, 151Eu and 153Eu, with 153Eu being the most abundant (52.2% natural abundance). While 153Eu is observationally stable (theoretically can undergo alpha decay with half-life over 5.5×1017 years), 151Eu was found in 2007 to be unstable and undergo alpha decay. The half-life is measured to be (4.62 ± 0.95(stat.) ± 0.68(syst.)) × 1018 years which corresponds to 1 alpha decay per two minutes in every kilogram of natural europium. Besides the natural radioisotope 151Eu, 36 artificial radioisotopes have been characterized, with the most stable being 150Eu with a half-life of 36.9 years, 152Eu with a half-life of 13.516 years, 154Eu with a half-life of 8.593 years, and 155Eu with a half-life of 4.7612 years. The majority of the remaining radioactive isotopes, which range from 130Eu to 170Eu, have half-lives that are less than 12.2 seconds. This element also has 18 metastable isomers, with the most stable being 150mEu (t1/2 12.8 hours), 152m1Eu (t1/2 9.3116 hours) and 152m5Eu (t1/2 96 minutes).

Naturally occurring xenon (54Xe) consists of seven stable isotopes and two very long-lived isotopes. Double electron capture has been observed in 124Xe and double beta decay in 136Xe, which are among the longest measured half-lives of all nuclides. The isotopes 126Xe and 134Xe are also predicted to undergo double beta decay, but this process has never been observed in these isotopes, so they are considered to be stable. Beyond these stable forms, 32 artificial unstable isotopes and various isomers have been studied, the longest-lived of which is 127Xe with a half-life of 36.345 days. All other isotopes have half-lives less than 12 days, most less than 20 hours. The shortest-lived isotope, 108Xe, has a half-life of 58 μs, and is the heaviest known nuclide with equal numbers of protons and neutrons. Of known isomers, the longest-lived is 131mXe with a half-life of 11.934 days. 129Xe is produced by beta decay of 129I ; 131mXe, 133Xe, 133mXe, and 135Xe are some of the fission products of both 235U and 239Pu, so are used as indicators of nuclear explosions.

Technetium (43Tc) is one of the two elements with Z < 83 that have no stable isotopes; the other such element is promethium. It is primarily artificial, with only trace quantities existing in nature produced by spontaneous fission or neutron capture by molybdenum. The first isotopes to be synthesized were 97Tc and 99Tc in 1936, the first artificial element to be produced. The most stable radioisotopes are 97Tc, 98Tc, and 99Tc.

Naturally occurring zirconium (40Zr) is composed of four stable isotopes (of which one may in the future be found radioactive), and one very long-lived radioisotope (96Zr), a primordial nuclide that decays via double beta decay with an observed half-life of 2.0×1019 years; it can also undergo single beta decay, which is not yet observed, but the theoretically predicted value of t1/2 is 2.4×1020 years. The second most stable radioisotope is 93Zr, which has a half-life of 1.53 million years. Thirty other radioisotopes have been observed. All have half-lives less than a day except for 95Zr (64.02 days), 88Zr (83.4 days), and 89Zr (78.41 hours). The primary decay mode is electron capture for isotopes lighter than 92Zr, and the primary mode for heavier isotopes is beta decay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear binding energy</span> Minimum energy required to separate particles within a nucleus

Nuclear binding energy in experimental physics is the minimum energy that is required to disassemble the nucleus of an atom into its constituent protons and neutrons, known collectively as nucleons. The binding energy for stable nuclei is always a positive number, as the nucleus must gain energy for the nucleons to move apart from each other. Nucleons are attracted to each other by the strong nuclear force. In theoretical nuclear physics, the nuclear binding energy is considered a negative number. In this context it represents the energy of the nucleus relative to the energy of the constituent nucleons when they are infinitely far apart. Both the experimental and theoretical views are equivalent, with slightly different emphasis on what the binding energy means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Valley of stability</span> Characterization of nuclide stability

In nuclear physics, the valley of stability is a characterization of the stability of nuclides to radioactivity based on their binding energy. Nuclides are composed of protons and neutrons. The shape of the valley refers to the profile of binding energy as a function of the numbers of neutrons and protons, with the lowest part of the valley corresponding to the region of most stable nuclei. The line of stable nuclides down the center of the valley of stability is known as the line of beta stability. The sides of the valley correspond to increasing instability to beta decay. The decay of a nuclide becomes more energetically favorable the further it is from the line of beta stability. The boundaries of the valley correspond to the nuclear drip lines, where nuclides become so unstable they emit single protons or single neutrons. Regions of instability within the valley at high atomic number also include radioactive decay by alpha radiation or spontaneous fission. The shape of the valley is roughly an elongated paraboloid corresponding to the nuclide binding energies as a function of neutron and atomic numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neutron number</span> The number of neutrons in a nuclide

The neutron number is the number of neutrons in a nuclide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isotope</span> Different atoms of the same element

Isotopes are distinct nuclear species of the same chemical element. They have the same atomic number and position in the periodic table, but differ in nucleon numbers due to different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei. While all isotopes of a given element have similar chemical properties, they have different atomic masses and physical properties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isobar (nuclide)</span> Atoms of different elements with the same number of nucleons

Isobars are atoms (nuclides) of different chemical elements that have the same number of nucleons. Correspondingly, isobars differ in atomic number but have the same mass number. An example of a series of isobars is 40S, 40Cl, 40Ar, 40K, and 40Ca. While the nuclei of these nuclides all contain 40 nucleons, they contain varying numbers of protons and neutrons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear drip line</span> Atomic nuclei decay delimiter

The nuclear drip line is the boundary beyond which atomic nuclei are unbound with respect to the emission of a proton or neutron.

The Mattauch isobar rule, formulated by Josef Mattauch in 1934, states that if two adjacent elements on the periodic table have isotopes of the same mass number, one of these isotopes must be radioactive. Two nuclides that have the same mass number (isobars) can both be stable only if their atomic numbers differ by more than one. In fact, for currently observationally stable nuclides, the difference can only be 2 or 4, and in theory, two nuclides that have the same mass number cannot be both stable, but many such nuclides which are theoretically unstable to double beta decay have not been observed to decay, e.g. 134Xe. However, this rule cannot make predictions on the half-lives of these radioisotopes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Even and odd atomic nuclei</span> Nuclear physics classification method

In nuclear physics, properties of a nucleus depend on evenness or oddness of its atomic number Z, neutron number N and, consequently, of their sum, the mass number A. Most importantly, oddness of both Z and N tends to lower the nuclear binding energy, making odd nuclei generally less stable. This effect is not only experimentally observed, but is included in the semi-empirical mass formula and explained by some other nuclear models, such as the nuclear shell model. This difference of nuclear binding energy between neighbouring nuclei, especially of odd-A isobars, has important consequences for beta decay.

References

  1. Proc. Int. Symposium on Why and How should we investigate Nuclides Far Off the Stability Line", Lysekil, Sweden, August 1966, eds. W. Forsling, C.J. Herrlander and H. Ryde, Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell, 1967
  2. Hansen, P. G. (1979). "Nuclei Far Away from the Line of Beta Stability: Studies by On-Line Mass Separation". Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science . 29: 69–119. Bibcode:1979ARNPS..29...69H. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ns.29.120179.000441 .
  3. "Interactive Chart of Nuclides (Brookhaven National Laboratory)". Archived from the original on 2020-07-25. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
  4. Audi, G.; Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S. (2017). "The NUBASE2016 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 41 (3): 030001. Bibcode:2017ChPhC..41c0001A. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030001.
  5. 1 2 Tretyak, V.I.; Zdesenko, Yu.G. (2002). "Tables of Double Beta Decay Data — An Update". At. Data Nucl. Data Tables . 80 (1): 83–116. Bibcode:2002ADNDT..80...83T. doi:10.1006/adnd.2001.0873.
  6. Aunola, M.; Suhonen, J.; Siiskonen, T. (1999). "Shell-model study of the highly forbidden beta decay 48Ca → 48Sc". EPL . 46 (5): 577. Bibcode:1999EL.....46..577A. doi:10.1209/epl/i1999-00301-2.
  7. Finch, S.W.; Tornow, W. (2016). "Search for the β decay of 96Zr". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 806: 70–74. Bibcode:2016NIMPA.806...70F. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.098 .
  8. 1 2 3 4
  9. 1 2 Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Cappella, C.; Caracciolo, V.; Cerulli, R.; Danevich, F.A.; Di Marco, A.; Incicchitti, A.; Poda, D.V.; Polischuk, O.G.; Tretyak, V.I. (2014). "Investigation of rare nuclear decays with BaF2 crystal scintillator contaminated by radium". European Physical Journal A. 50 (9): 134–143. arXiv: 1407.5844 . Bibcode:2014EPJA...50..134B. doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14134-6. S2CID   118513731.
  10. 1 2 Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 45 (3): 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Koura, H. (2011). Decay modes and a limit of existence of nuclei in the superheavy mass region (PDF). 4th International Conference on the Chemistry and Physics of the Transactinide Elements. Retrieved 18 November 2018.
  12. Belli, P.; Bernabei, R.; Danevich, F. A.; et al. (2019). "Experimental searches for rare alpha and beta decays". European Physical Journal A. 55 (8): 140–1–140–7. arXiv: 1908.11458 . Bibcode:2019EPJA...55..140B. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12823-2. ISSN   1434-601X. S2CID   201664098.
  13. Koura, H.; Katakura, J; Tachibana, T; Minato, F (2015). "Chart of the Nuclides". Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved 30 October 2018.
  14. Zagrebaev, Valeriy; Karpov, Alexander; Greiner, Walter (2013). "Future of superheavy element research: Which nuclei could be synthesized within the next few years?" (PDF). Journal of Physics. 420 (1): 012001. arXiv: 1207.5700 . Bibcode:2013JPhCS.420a2001Z. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/420/1/012001. S2CID   55434734.
  15. 1 2 Möller, P.; Sierk, A.J.; Ichikawa, T.; Sagawa, H. (2016). "Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012)". Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables. 109–110: 1–204. arXiv: 1508.06294 . Bibcode:2016ADNDT.109....1M. doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002. S2CID   118707897.
  16. Möller, P. (2016). "The limits of the nuclear chart set by fission and alpha decay" (PDF). EPJ Web of Conferences. 131: 03002:1–8. Bibcode:2016EPJWC.13103002M. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/201613103002 .
  17. Bosch, Fritz (1995). "Manipulation of Nuclear Lifetimes in Storage Rings" (PDF). Physica Scripta. T59: 221–229. Bibcode:1995PhST...59..221B. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/1995/t59/030. S2CID   250860726. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-26.
  18. Liu, Shuo; Gao, Chao; Xu, Chang (2021). "Investigation of bound state β decay half-lives of bare atoms". Physical Review C. 104 (2): 024304. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024304.