Canadian Judicial Council

Last updated
Canadian Judicial Council
Conseil canadien de la magistrature
Formation1971;53 years ago (1971)
Headquarters Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0W8
Region
Canada
Chair
Justice Richard Wagner
Website cjc-ccm.ca

The Canadian Judicial Council (CJC; French : Conseil canadien de la magistrature) is the national council of the judiciary of Canada, overseeing the country's federal judges.

Contents

The Council has 44 members, composed of chief justices and associate chief justices. It is chaired by the Chief Justice of Canada, currently Justice Richard Wagner. [1]

History

The council was created in 1971 by the Parliament of Canada [2] following years of discussion about the need to coordinate professional development and judicial conduct matters for judges, in a way that would respect the judiciary as an independent branch of government. The review of complaints had previously usually been coordinated by the Department of Justice, with the occasional involvement of local Chief Justices.

Landreville case

A key factor that facilitated the creation of the council was the case of justice Leo Landreville. He was charged with a criminal offence. Those charges were dismissed, but allegations of impropriety continued to be made by some. This gave rise to quite a bit of public debate; some in the legal profession criticized the fact that the judge was still sitting. A Committee of the Law Society, despite not having jurisdiction over a federally appointed judge, produced a negative report without even notifying Landreville of its proceedings.

There being no defined process to formally inquire into the conduct of a judge, the government then constituted a one-man Royal Commission headed by former Supreme Court Justice Ivan Rand. In his report, Rand found some improprieties and was critical of Justice Landreville. However, some said Mr Rand was biased and famous constitutional lawyer J.J. Robinette who represented Justice Landreville before the Commission was seriously critical of the process.

After the Rand report became public, a joint Committee of Parliament eventually recommended the judge's removal and he resigned.

There were many who came to a view that the process which had been followed was flawed: the absence of a process defined in legislation to review the conduct of a judge left too much room for review by the law societies, government or Parliament, of even other bodies without necessarily involving the judiciary.

Professor William Kaplan, in his book Bad Judgment, wrote that "[w]ithout a doubt, the Landreville case figured prominently in the decision to establish the council." He quotes the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice who spoke during second reading of the Bill that created the Council: "Because the independence of the judiciary is an integral part of the Canadian democratic process, it is important that the judiciary become, to some extent, a self-disciplinary body." [3]

According to Martin Friedland, "There is no doubt that the awkwardness and uncertainty of the Landreville proceeding was a factor motivating Parliament to adopt this new procedure." [4]

Organization and activities

The CJC's activities have been characterized as seeking to investigate complaints about judicial misbehaviour and on the other hand protecting the reputation of judges against unfounded accusations. [2]

Members

The Council has 44 members, composed of chief justices and associate chief justices. It is chaired by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, currently Justice Richard Wagner. [1] [5]

CJC members, as of November 2021 [1]
JusticeJurisdictionTitle
Richard Wagner (Chairperson) Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice of Canada
Ritu Khullar Court of Appeal of Alberta Chief Justice of Alberta
Kent Davidson Court of King's Bench of Alberta Chief Justice of the Court
Kenneth G. NielsenCourt of King's Bench of AlbertaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
D. Blair NixonCourt of King's Bench of AlbertaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Leonard Marchand British Columbia Court of Appeal Chief Justice of British Columbia
Ronald A. Skolrood Supreme Court of British Columbia Chief Justice of the Court
Heather J. HolmesSupreme Court of British ColumbiaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Marianne Rivoalen Manitoba Court of Appeal Chief Justice of Manitoba
Glenn Joyal Court of King's Bench of Manitoba Chief Justice of the Court
Shane I. PerlmutterCourt of King's Bench of ManitobaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Gwen B. HatchCourt of King's Bench of ManitobaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court, Family Division
J.C. Marc Richard Court of Appeal of New Brunswick Chief Justice of New Brunswick
Tracey DeWare Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick Chief Justice of the Court
Larry Landry Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick Associate Chief Justice of the Court
Deborah E. Fry Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador Chief Justice of Newfoundland and Labrador
Raymond P. Whalen Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Chief Justice of the Trial Division of the Court
Rosalie McGrath Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Associate Chief Justice of the Trial Division of the Court
Shannon Smallwood Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories Chief Justice of the Court
Michael J. Wood Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Chief Justice of Nova Scotia
Deborah K. Smith Nova Scotia Supreme Court Chief Justice of the Court
R. Lester JesudasonSupreme Court of Nova ScotakAssociate Chief Justice of the Court, Family Division
Patrick J. DuncanSupreme Court of Nova ScotiaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Susan Cooper Nunavut Court of Justice Acting Chief Justice of the Court
Michael H. Tulloch Court of Appeal for Ontario Chief Justice of Ontario
Geoffrey Morawetz Ontario Superior Court of Justice Chief Justice of the Court
J. Michal FairburnCourt of Appeal for OntarioAssociate Chief Justice of Ontario
Faye E. McWatt Ontario Superior Court of JusticeAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
James W. Gormley Court of Appeal of Prince Edward Island Chief Justice of Prince Edward Island
Tracey L. Clements Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island Chief Justice of the Court
Manon Savard Quebec Court of Appeal Chief Justice of Quebec
Marie-Anne Paquette Superior Court of Quebec Chief Justice of the Court
Catherine La RosaSuperior Court of QuebecSenior Associate Chief Justice of the Court
Jean-Francois MichaudSuperior Court of QuebecAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Robert Leurer Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Chief Justice of Saskatchewan
Martel D. Popescul Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan Chief Justice of the Court
Michael D. Tochor Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan Associate Chief Justice of the Court
Suzanne M. Duncan Supreme Court of Yukon Chief Justice of the Court
Yves de Montigny Federal Court of Appeal Chief Justice of the Court
Paul S. Crampton Federal Court Chief Justice of the Court
VACANT Federal Court Associate Chief Justice of the Court
Gabrielle St-Hilaire Tax Court of Canada Chief Justice of the Court
Anick PelletierTax Court of CanadaAssociate Chief Justice of the Court
Mary J.L. Gleason Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Chief Justice of the Court

Review of Complaints

The Canadian Judicial Council was granted power under the Judges Act to investigate complaints made by members of the public or the Attorney General about the conduct of federally appointed judges. After its review and investigation of a complaint, the Council can make recommendations to Parliament through the Minister of Justice that a judge be removed from office.

Canada is one of the very few countries where a complaint can be made against the Chief Justice in the same way as any other judge.[ citation needed ] The Chief Justice is not involved in the review of complaints.

List of public inquiries

While the majority of complaints are dealt with quickly and without a public hearing, there are some instances where a judge's conduct is considered to be of sufficient concern that further inquiry is warranted.

Since its inception in 1971, the CJC has referred a total of 14 complaints (one involving three judges) to an inquiry committee: [6] [7] [8]

NameInquiry yearCommittee recommendationOutcome
1.Gordon Hart1990Remain
2.Malachi Jones1990Remain
3.Angus MacDonald1990Remain
4.Fernand L. Gratton1994NoneResigned before committee made recommendation
5.Jean Bienvenue1996RemovalResigned
6.Robert Flahiff1999RemovalResigned
7.Bernard Flynn2003Remain
8.Jean-Guy Boilard2003Remain
9.Theodore Matlow2007RemovalRemained after full panel of CJC recommended he not be removed [6]
10. Paul Cosgrove 2009RemovalResigned
11. Lori Douglas 2012None (proceedings stayed)Decision stayed after Douglas agreed to retire early [9] [10]
11.Michel Déziel2015Remain [11]
12Michel Girouard2016Removal [12] Full panel of CJC recommended he not be removed [12]
13. Robin Camp 2016Removal [13] Resigned, after the Minister of Justice sought to remove Justice Camp from the bench [14]
14.Michel Girouard2017Removal [15] A re-hearing of the first inquiry conducted in 2016. [16] The full council voted 23–3 in favour of recommending to the Minister of Justice to remove Justice Girouard from office on February 20, 2018. [17] Resigned after appeals failed. [18]
15.Frank Newbould2017None (proceedings stayed)Justice Newbould retired from office before the proceedings of the Inquiry Committee began. [19]

Criticisms

Limited removals

In its 40-year history, the CJC has only ordered 11 public inquiries and only twice recommended that a judge be removed from the bench. [20] In the 145 years since Confederation, only five superior court judges have been recommended for removal from the bench. [5] All but one resigned before being removed. [5]

The CJC has declined to recommend removal even in cases where there was a finding of inappropriate conduct. [20] In 2008, a CJC inquiry panel recommended removing Ontario Superior Court Justice Theodore Matlow from the bench, but a majority of the full CJC overruled the removal recommendation despite agreeing there was misconduct. [5] Rocco Galati criticized the difficulty of removing judges, saying that "it's easier to get a constitutional amendment than to remove a judge." [5]

After a full panel of the CJC ignored its committee recommendation and recommended that Quebec judge Michel Girouard should remain on the bench, federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and Quebec Justice Minister Stéphanie Vallée ordered the CJC to reconsider its decision. [21]

The CJC has said that misconduct should not guarantee the judge's removal, and the gravity of the misconduct must be determined. [20] Osgoode Hall Law School professor Trevor Farrow said that the rarity of removals reflects the high value that is placed on independence for judges in Canada. [20]

Makeup of CJC

The CJC is composed only of judges. Galati criticized the makeup of the CJC, pointing out that judges are the only truly self-regulating profession in Canada, and has urged public participation in the process. [5] Osgoode Hall Law School professor Allan Hutchison argued that the CJC should include members of the public, and criticized the hypocrisy of judges calling for natural justice in other professions. [5] University of Calgary Faculty of Law professor and Canadian Association for Legal Ethics president Alice Wooley said including laypersons in the CJC would ensure that the process is less insular and more transparent. [21]

Secrecy

In September 2003, the Canadian Justice Review Board, a non-governmental advocacy group and "coalition of citizens," [22] expressed concern that the CJC is too secretive. [23] Wooley criticized the CJC for not clearly articulating what constituted misconduct worthy of sanctions. [21]

Range of sanctions

Some critics have pointed out that the only available sanction of removal may not be appropriate in some circumstances. [21]

Related Research Articles

Judicial independence is the concept that the judiciary should be independent from the other branches of government. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests. Judicial independence is important for the idea of separation of powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of Canada</span> Presiding judge of the Supreme Court of Canada

The chief justice of Canada is the presiding judge of the nine-member Supreme Court of Canada, the highest judicial body in Canada. As such, the chief justice is the highest-ranking judge of the Canadian court system. The Supreme Court Act makes the chief justice, a Crown in Council appointment, meaning the Crown acting on the advice of the prime minister and minister of justice. The chief justice serves until they resign, turn 75 years old, die, or are removed from office for cause. By tradition, a new chief justice is chosen from among the court's incumbent puisne justices.

The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

Paul James Cosgrove,, is a former Canadian jurist as well as a former politician.

The Vermont Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority of the U.S. state of Vermont. Unlike most other states, the Vermont Supreme Court hears appeals directly from the trial courts, as Vermont has no intermediate appeals court.

<i>Re Therrien</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Re Therrien, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2001 SCC 35, is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on judicial independence.

Léo Landreville was a Canadian politician and lawyer, who served as mayor of Sudbury, Ontario in 1955 and 1956 before being appointed to the Supreme Court of Ontario as a judge. He later became the first Ontario Supreme Court justice ever to be removed from the bench, after being implicated in the Northern Ontario Natural Gas scandal.

Judicial appointmentsin Canada are made by the federal government or provincial government. Superior and federal court judges are appointed by federal government, while inferior courts are appointed by the provincial government.

The Judicial Commission of New South Wales is an independent statutory corporation of the New South Wales Government that provides sentencing information and continuing education to and examines complaints made against judicial officers in New South Wales, Australia.

The Judiciary of Virginia is defined under the Constitution and law of Virginia and is composed of the Supreme Court of Virginia and subordinate courts, including the Court of Appeals, the Circuit Courts, and the General District Courts. Its administration is headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Council, the Committee on District Courts, the Judicial Conferences, the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission, and various other offices and officers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Louisiana</span>

The Judiciary of Louisiana is defined under the Constitution and law of Louisiana and is composed of the Louisiana Supreme Court, the Louisiana Circuit Courts of Appeal, the District Courts, the Justice of the Peace Courts, the Mayor's Courts, the City Courts, and the Parish Courts. The Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court is the chief administrator of the judiciary, and its administration is aided by the Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, and the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct is an eleven-member panel with authority to discipline judges of the New York courts. The Commission is constitutionally established to investigate and prosecute complaints filed against New York judges.

Robin Camp is a former Federal Court of Canada judge. Camp was the subject of a high-profile removal hearing before the Canadian Judicial Council for his role in a 2014 sexual assault trial that he presided over. The judicial committee recommended that he be removed from the bench. In 2018 Camp was reinstated into the Law Society of Alberta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Maraga</span> 14th Chief Justice of the Republic of Kenya

David Kenani Maraga is a Kenyan lawyer and jurist. He was the 14th Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya from October 2016 until his retirement in January 2021.

Umar Ata Bandial is a Pakistani jurist who served as the 28th Chief Justice of Pakistan from February 2022 to September 2023. He was appointed as the Chief Justice after the approval by President Arif Alvi on 13 January 2022, after which he assumed his office on 2 February 2022 and retired on 16 September 2023.

Sayyed Muhammad Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi is a removed Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, he assumed office on 16 March 2020 and was removed as a Judge on 10 January 2024. Naqvi previously served as a Judge of the Lahore High Court before his out of turn elevation to the Supreme Court.

Judicial independence is regarded as one of the foundation values of the Australian legal system, such that the High Court held in 2004 that a court capable of exercising federal judicial power must be, and must appear to be, an independent and impartial tribunal. Former Chief Justice Gerard Brennan described judicial independence as existing "to serve and protect not the governors but the governed", albeit one that "rests on the calibre and the character of the judges themselves". Despite general agreement as to its importance and common acceptance of some elements, there is no agreement as to each of the elements of judicial independence.

Carmen E. Garza is a former chief magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. She served as a magistrate judge from August 2006 to August 22, 2022, holding the position of chief magistrate judge from early 2018 until the end of her tenure on the bench. In 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico voted against reappointing Garza for a further term as magistrate judge as a result of misconduct allegations against her.

On 21 February 2024, the National Assembly of South Africa voted to impeach Judge John Hlophe, a judge of the High Court of South Africa and the judge president of the Western Cape Division. Hlophe was accused of improper interference in the deliberations of the Constitutional Court in litigation involving the interests of Jacob Zuma. His impeachment was the result of a finding by the Judicial Service Commission that his conduct in this regard amounted to gross misconduct. Hlophe was the first judge to be impeached under the post-apartheid Constitution.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "About the Council". Canadian Judicial Council. Retrieved 2021-11-14.
  2. 1 2 Morton, Frederick Lee (2002-01-01). Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada. University of Calgary Press. ISBN   9781552380468.
  3. ↑ Kaplan, William. Bad Judgment. p. 194.
  4. ↑ Friedland, Martin. 1995. A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada. p. 88.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 McKiernan, Michael. "Judging the judges". Canadian Lawyer. Retrieved 2024-01-15.
  6. 1 2 Scallan, Niamh (2012-07-30). "Lori Douglas scandal inquiry: A look at cases when judges judge themselves". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  7. ↑ "What's at stake in the case of Justice Robin Camp". Maclean's. 2016-09-07. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  8. ↑ "Canadian Judicial Council Inquiry Committee Decisions". Canadian Judicial Council. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  9. ↑ Pritchard, Dean (24 November 2014). "Lori Douglas to quit rather than face inquiry". Winnipeg Sun . Retrieved 26 November 2014.
  10. ↑ Statement by the Canadian Judicial Council regarding the Inquiry in to the conduct of the Honourable Lori Douglas
  11. ↑ "Quebec judge handled illegal donations but panel says he should keep his job" . Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  12. 1 2 "Judge who allegedly bought cocaine should stay on bench, says judicial watchdog" . Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  13. ↑ "In the Matter of an Inquiry Pursuant to s. 63(1) of the Judges Act Regarding the Honourable Justice Robin Camp Report and Recommendation of the Inquiry Committee to the Canadian Judicial Council" (PDF). Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  14. ↑ "Judge in 'knees together' sex assault case resigns after judicial council recommends removal". CBC News . 2017-03-09. Archived from the original on 2023-06-07.
  15. ↑ An Inquiry Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council recommends the removal of Justice Michel Girouard
  16. ↑ Federal, Quebec justice ministers ask CJC for new hearing on Girouard
  17. ↑ Canadian Judicial Council recommends that Justice Michel Girouard be removed from office
  18. ↑ Michel Girouard resigns from Quebec Superior Court: Canadian Judicial Council
  19. ↑ Report of the Inquiry Committee to the Canadian Judicial Council
  20. 1 2 3 4 "What it takes to have a misbehaving judge dismissed". CBC News. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Schmitz, Chris. "Growing calls for reform in way those who judge others are judged". Lawyer's Weekly. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
  22. ↑ Crosby, Connie. "Canadian Justice Review Board - Curious Question". SLaw Magazine. Retrieved May 3, 2013.
  23. ↑ "Press Release," Canadian Justice Review Board, 4 Feb. 2005 Archived 2011-09-11 at the Wayback Machine , accessed 13 July 2013
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.