Cholera epidemics in Spain

Last updated

The cholera epidemics in Spain were a series of morbid cholera outbreaks that occurred from the first third of the 19th century until the end of the same century in the large cities of Spain. [1] [2] In total, some 800,000 people died during the four pandemics that occurred in Spain during that century. However, cholera was one of several contagious diseases that struck the country. Suffice it to say that the Spanish population in 1800 was 11.5 million people and was characterized by a high birth and death rate. The successive pandemics that the country suffered caused an economic recession, as well as an opportunity for profound change in health and hygiene in Spain. It was not free of controversy, both for the use of the vaccines created by Jaime Ferrán y Clúa and for the ways of combating the disease, as well as for the policies used to deal with it. It is worth mentioning that the terror caused in the population, due to the deaths caused, was the cause of popular revolts and social instability.

Contents

Since the first outbreak in 1817, which occurred in India, it has been known as a pandemic disease. Its subsequent spread throughout successive European countries finally led to the appearance of the first cases in Spain. The first outbreak occurred in early 1833, in the port of Vigo, which was repeated almost simultaneously in southern Spain (Andalusia). [3] The first outbreak arose in a conflictive and unstable political environment, in the midst of a severe political transition. The then very recent death of Ferdinand VII after the Ominous Decade left a weak and conflict-ridden state, the first outbreaks occurred during what would become the First Carlist War that was taking place in northern Spain. In 1884, Robert Koch discovered the origin of the disease in the form of a bacillus; the fight against its advance already had a scientific sense from that year on, however epidemic outbreaks appeared throughout the world. In the 20th century, there were only two outbreaks of cholera in Spain, in 1971 and 1979. [4] [5]

Characteristics

Cholera is an infectious disease caused by enterotoxins of the bacillus Vibrio cholerae . The patients show a syndrome based on vomiting and excessive diarrhea (called cholerine) with watery stools with little or no fever, after an incubation period of one or two days. Death occurs from dehydration in less than a week. The disease is usually transmitted by water and food. When the outbreak becomes established in a population, it is the abundant stools (more than thirty times a day) that easily contaminate drinking water sources and the clothes of the affected persons. It spreads easily in humid areas, and its incidence is higher in countries with a warm climate.

The disease arrived in Europe between 1817 and 1823 from India. It struck various parts of Europe from this date onwards, and its victims numbered several million. [6] Finally, on February 2, 1884, Dr. Robert Koch discovered the bacillus causing the disease in the feces of patients. [7] [8] Before this date, all cures were scientifically meaningless lucubrations, since many of the doctors were attached to the miasmatic theory. Many of the prophylactic activities were based on bloodletting, which due to its abundance produced deaths by exsanguination. Emollient and mucilaginous enemas were frequent. After Koch's discovery, Dr. Jaime Ferrán y Clúa tested a vaccine in Spain a year later, which was widely criticized by scientists and politicians. To this criticism contributed the Spaniard Santiago Ramón y Cajal, who denied the effectiveness of the method proposed by Jaime. Finally, the vaccine is not officially approved, and only until June 1919, at an international congress on hygiene held in Paris, it was finally accepted publicly.

At present, penicillins are not used for its cure: with a solution of tetracycline its effects are considerably reduced. The current treatment consists of rehydration of the patient with mineral salts, either intravenously or orally. Cholera disease seems to have disappeared in Europe and America at the end of the 19th century, and since 1950 only sporadic outbreaks have occurred in India and nearby countries such as Bangladesh. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) records new outbreaks every year in different parts of the world, generally in developing countries. Nevertheless, two new outbreaks appeared in Spain in the mid-twentieth century, which were relatively easily contained, and in which the number of victims was low, compared to the outbreaks of the 19th century.

History

One of the characteristics of the initial evolution of cholera is that each infected country tried to solve the problem on its own, without requesting help from the rest and without taking any joint action or providing any information to other nations. In Spain, it happened in the same way. Infectious diseases are a common form of mortality, and at the beginning of the 20th century, deaths from infectious diseases still accounted for almost a quarter of all deaths. Cholera was one of the most feared by society, but it was not the only one that plagued the country: yellow fever and smallpox were examples. The mortality from the different outbreaks caused about 300 000 deaths in the period 1833-1834, about 236 000 deaths in 1854-1855, about 120 000 in 1865 and another 120 000 in 1885. [2] It can be seen that the last outbreak occurred when the cause of the disease was already known. Cholera affected in its various outbreaks mainly the eastern half of the Iberian Peninsula, and particularly the densely populated urban centers on the coast and some of them also in the interior. Since the disease appeared in Great Britain in 1832, there was concern in Spain about its origin, prevention and treatment. However, since the etiology of the disease was unknown, preventive actions were trials without any scientific basis.

First measures

The administration took preventive measures to stop the advance of the disease, believing in the classic epidemic theories of the time. Dr. Pedro Castelló obtained from Fernando VII the authorization to send, in February 1832, a medical commission composed of Pedro María Rubio, Lorenzo Sánchez Núñez and Francisco Paula y Folch, in order to study the effects of cholera in cities such as Paris, Vienna and Munich. The result of their trip was the report sent from Berlin on May 31, 1833, which was not published until 1834. The appearance of the first outbreak in the peninsula from 1832 onwards was a question of time. Some of the measures were based on the creation of sanitary cordons, quarantines in the lazarettos, sectorized isolation of the population, and the establishment of hospitals. The hygienic conditions of some populated cities were improved, cleaning the streets more frequently. A Plan for the Cure of Morbid Cholera was published. The first controversy arose when the cords began to be applied to certain segments of the population: some doctors did not agree with the application of cords because of their dubious efficiency, besides the fact that they paralyzed economic activities. Some physicians, however, agreed with the measures and adopted them at their own discretion in the absence of a central health authority.

At this time in the 19th century, cholera was considered an epidemic disease, not at all contagious, and therefore it was thought that the best course of action was to have good hygiene in order not to get it. The Plan for the Cure of Morbid Cholera gave numerous indications in this respect. It was mentioned that the main cause of cholera resided in the atmosphere itself. Prophylactic actions were carried out, such as taking the sale of fruits and vegetables out of the cities. Local Health Boards were established. The main pathogenic theories on morbidity were nervous, spasmodic, humoral and gastroenteric or inflammatory. One of the doctors who stood out in the first outbreaks was the hygienist Mateo Seoane Sobral, who published several articles on the evolution of pandemics in Europe, compiling the experiences of other countries in the treatment of the disease. In the same way, the precursor of Spanish epidemiology, Nicasio Landa y Álvarez de Carvallo carried out numerous statistical studies (medical topography, incidence rates, lethality rates, etc.) that allow studying the evolution of the disease today, especially those corresponding to the second outbreak of 1855.

First outbreak

Nine months had passed since cholera had arrived in Paris, and a year and a half since it had arrived in England, and the Spanish and Portuguese authorities knew that it was only a matter of time before the first outbreak appeared on the peninsula. The first cases of the disease occurred in the city of Vigo, in January 1833. [3] The first affected person was named Francisco Conde, and lived in the vicinity of the Vigo arsenal. In Barcelona, an outbreak occurred almost simultaneously. The outbreak started due to the landing of combat troops from the Portuguese War of Succession; it is possible that they were responsible for their arrival in Spain, and it was in Andalusia where the most deadly cases occurred in the summer of that same year. The arrival of winter slowed the advance of the pandemic throughout the country, and when spring arrived, the disease reached Madrid in a second advance. From Vigo it spread to Pontevedra, and was isolated in that area of Galicia. Other stories mention that the disease came aboard the steamship Isabel la Católica, which came from Greece; in it, three sick people were traveling and were isolated in the corresponding lazaretto. However, days later cases appeared in Redondela, Tuy, Vigo, Pontevedra and in almost all the towns of the province.

The outbreak in southern Spain was more virulent, and spread with great force due to environmental conditions, reaching Madrid, Toledo, Guadalajara, Soria, Avila, Burgos and Cuenca. In the capital, already in July 1834, the terror of the disease was of such intensity that there were massacres of friars, accused of causing the disease by poisoning the water. The event was reported in the local press. Everyone began to be suspected, the water carriers, the pharmacists, the doctors. [9] The number of complaints of people suspected of contaminating the water multiplied.

There was a third route of entry of the cholera of 1834 through the Mediterranean, the Balearic Islands and Tarragona. One of the causes was the French ship Triton, which had left Toulon with soldiers of the foreign legion on a long voyage that included Oran and Algiers. Cases of cholera on the ship began as soon as it left Toulon and, despite quarantining and sanitizing with lime, the ship spread cholera to the cities where it stopped, such as Tarragona and Roses. [10] This first epidemic affected some 1,394 towns, the last province affected was Cáceres and the last town was Ceclavín. The epidemic lasted a total of one year, five months and twenty-two days. From the first outbreak almost 300,000 people were affected, three percent of the population.

Successive outbreaks

Senor de las Tribulaciones, image to which was attributed the end of the cholera-morbo-asiatic cholera in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, in 1893. Francisco Santa Cruz 07.jpg
Señor de las Tribulaciones , image to which was attributed the end of the cholera-morbo-asiatic cholera in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, in 1893.

On November 19, 1853, the disease returned to the port of Vigo, through the steamship Isabel La Católica. The ship and its crew remained in quarantine in the lazaretto on the island of San Simón, from where the pathology gradually spread throughout the Rías Bajas. At first, the outbreak only affected the lower classes, but it became increasingly virulent, and in 1854 it spread throughout La Coruña, causing three thousand deaths, according to an estimate by the doctor and mayor of La Coruña, Narciso Pérez Reoyo. [11]

The epidemic of 1855 affected large areas of the interior. This second outbreak is the most documented by the press of the time and the one with the greatest impact on the memory of those affected. It is possible to think that one out of every nineteen Spaniards was affected in the second epidemic. Although it was not the most deadly of the cholera outbreaks that occurred in Spain in the 19th century, it was devastating because of the consequences generated by its fear. All this despite the fact that the modes of transmission of the infection among the population were already beginning to be suspected and an incipient international network of health posts was being coordinated to provide regular information on the evolution and situation of the disease. In some cities, such as Madrid, the water communication and sanitation system was renewed, creating the Isabel II Canal. Epidemic outbreaks appeared successively in the Spanish provinces. This outbreak attacked with greater virulence the lower classes, especially the emerging working classes.

Worldwide, the next pandemic emerged in 1863 and lasted until 1873. In 1865, cholera entered Spain through the port of Valencia, and the most affected provinces were Valencia, Palma de Mallorca, Gerona, León, Albacete, Huesca and Teruel. Dr. Antonio Fernández García did a commendable job of data collection. In Spain, political changes had occurred during the period from 1855 to 1865.

In 1885, a great cholera epidemic affected about 5000 people, of whom 50 percent died, in the province of Jaén. It arrived preceded by some catastrophic phenomena, such as earthquakes and torrential rains, which created the ground for the epidemic to develop. It arrived from the Levant, through the province of Granada. In July 1885, it was already affecting towns such as Villacarrillo, Torreperogil, Cazorla, Arjonilla and Baeza. Although the first case was registered in Jaén on August 13, a month earlier there were deaths caused by enterocolitis, a diagnosis that can be interpreted as a euphemism for cholera when the disease is not declared. The total number of fatalities in the capital was 611, similar to that of the 1855 epidemic, but lower, percentage-wise; in any case, much higher than that of the national total. [12]

One of the last most virulent outbreaks occurred in 1893 in the Canary Islands. On October 11 of that year, the Italian ship Remo docked in Santa Cruz de Tenerife; it arrived from Rio Grande, on its way to Genoa. [13] The isolation measures failed, which caused an epidemic of Asian-morbid-cholera to spread throughout the city and neighboring municipalities. Alarm spread to the other islands, which were immediately cut off from the island of Tenerife. Religious rogatory processions were carried out through the streets of the city, such as the Señor de las Tribulaciones (Lord of Tribulations). The attitude of the people of Santa Cruz during the epidemic earned the city the title of "Very Beneficent" and the Cross of First Class of the Spanish Order of Beneficence. [14] It is estimated that 1,744 citizens were affected by the disease (8.84% of the population), of whom 382 died (21.90%). [13]

Outbreaks in the 20th century

In the 20th century, the use of anti-cholera vaccines became regularized and the approach to the disease became known. There was progress in the development of vaccines and antibiotics. In spite of everything, there was an epidemic outbreak of cholera in the middle of Franco's regime, and the focus was located on the banks of the Jalón river; this occurred in July 1971. [15] Later, there was another outbreak in 1979. [5]

Social effects

The first outbreak of cholera was treated very discreetly by the Spanish press. For example, in the Madrid press the real situation was concealed until the outbreak reached the capital in 1834. It was feared that the disease would paralyze trade activities. The cholera pandemics, and especially that of 1885, have been extensively studied, including their therapeutic dimensions. The controversies about the possible scientific treatments, the discussions about the most effective ones, all of them were of great importance and created social alarm. It is worth mentioning Ferran's vaccination and the national controversy unleashed around it. In any case, the social controversy was found in the frequent miraculous treatments. There was no shortage of healers who cured by means of prayers, magic words and signs. The multitude of ways of pretending to cure the disease depended fundamentally on the etiopathogenic doctrines held by the physicians of the time. As a prophylactic, quinine sulfate, camphor, and benzoic acid were recommended; other remedies were cinnabar cigar, a mineral rich in mercury, and charcoal smoke.

The level of destitution in the cities was high; since the end of the 18th century, the number of people in such conditions in the big cities did not stop growing. It was this social group that led popular revolts, some directed against the Church and others against other hierarchical bodies of power. [9] Riots broke out in the big cities. Their lifestyle, lacking hygiene, food and basic means, made them one of the targets of the disease. Cities and towns became isolated and suffered from access controls. Walled cities used the walls as a "barrier of access". Suspects were taken to the lazarettos. The Carlist Wars, with their consequent movement of troops, contributed to the spread of cholera epidemics. The terror caused by the disease caused the cholera outbreak of 1865 to empty cities such as Madrid and Burgos. A large percentage of the population was displaced, leaving their businesses abandoned and the cities depopulated. The effect on the economy was felt in subsequent decades. After each outbreak, the fields were abandoned and were followed by periods of famine that affected large groups of the population.

Prior to these epidemics, cemeteries in Spain were located in the center of cities, sometimes near the hospitals themselves, and sometimes people were buried inside churches. The transfer of the cemeteries from the center of the towns to the outskirts was due precisely to the number of deaths. In many cases, cemeteries were moved from within the city walls to outside the city walls. [16] In many cemeteries, "family" graves were kept open, waiting for new deaths among close relatives to cover them when they were full. After the first outbreaks, rare was the city that did not have cemeteries located "on the outskirts"; at present, some of the popular cemeteries are located on the outskirts, and date from the beginning of the 20th century. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cholera</span> Bacterial infection of the small intestine

Cholera is an infection of the small intestine by some strains of the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Symptoms may range from none, to mild, to severe. The classic symptom is large amounts of watery diarrhea lasting a few days. Vomiting and muscle cramps may also occur. Diarrhea can be so severe that it leads within hours to severe dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. This may result in sunken eyes, cold skin, decreased skin elasticity, and wrinkling of the hands and feet. Dehydration can cause the skin to turn bluish. Symptoms start two hours to five days after exposure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish flu</span> 1918–1920 global influenza pandemic caused by the H1N1 influenza A virus

The 1918–1920 flu pandemic, also known as the Great Influenza epidemic or by the common misnomer Spanish flu, was an exceptionally deadly global influenza pandemic caused by the H1N1 influenza A virus. The earliest documented case was March 1918 in the state of Kansas in the United States, with further cases recorded in France, Germany and the United Kingdom in April. Two years later, nearly a third of the global population, or an estimated 500 million people, had been infected in four successive waves. Estimates of deaths range from 17 million to 50 million, and possibly as high as 100 million, making it one of the deadliest pandemics in history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jaume Ferran i Clua</span>

Jaime Ferran y Clua was a Spanish-French bacteriologist and sanitarian, contemporary of Robert Koch, and said by his fellows to have made some of the discoveries attributed to Koch. As early as 1885, he wrote on immunization against cholera. In 1893, his work on this subject was translated into French with the title L'Inoculation préventive contre le Cholera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1817–1824 cholera pandemic</span> Health disaster

The first cholera pandemic (1817–1824), also known as the first Asiatic cholera pandemic or Asiatic cholera, began near the city of Calcutta and spread throughout South Asia and Southeast Asia to the Middle East, Eastern Africa and the Mediterranean coast. While cholera had spread across India many times previously, this outbreak went further; it reached as far as China and the Mediterranean Sea before subsiding. Millions of people died as a result of this pandemic, including many British soldiers, which attracted European attention. This was the first of several cholera pandemics to sweep through Asia and Europe during the 19th and 20th centuries. This first pandemic spread over an unprecedented range of territory, affecting almost every country in Asia.

The second cholera pandemic (1826–1837), also known as the Asiatic cholera pandemic, was a cholera pandemic that reached from India across Western Asia to Europe, Great Britain, and the Americas, as well as east to China and Japan. Cholera caused more deaths, more quickly, than any other epidemic disease in the 19th century. The medical community now believes cholera to be exclusively a human disease, spread through many means of travel during the time, and transmitted through warm fecal-contaminated river waters and contaminated foods. During the second pandemic, the scientific community varied in its beliefs about the causes of cholera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1846–1860 cholera pandemic</span> The third major outbreak of cholera, 1846–1860 worldwide pandemic

The third cholera pandemic (1846–1860) was the third major outbreak of cholera originating in India in the 19th century that reached far beyond its borders, which researchers at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) believe may have started as early as 1837 and lasted until 1863. In the Russian Empire, more than one million people died of cholera. In 1853–1854, the epidemic in London claimed over 10,000 lives, and there were 23,000 deaths for all of Great Britain. This pandemic was considered to have the highest fatalities of the 19th-century epidemics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1863–1875 cholera pandemic</span> One of several 19th century epidemics

The fourth cholera pandemic of the 19th century began in the Ganges Delta of the Bengal region and traveled with Muslim pilgrims to Mecca. In its first year, the epidemic claimed 30,000 of 90,000 pilgrims. Cholera spread throughout the Middle East and was carried to the Russian Empire, Europe, Africa, and North America, in each case spreading via travelers from port cities and along inland waterways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1881–1896 cholera pandemic</span>

The fifth cholera pandemic (1881–1896) was the fifth major international outbreak of cholera in the 19th century. The endemic origin of the pandemic, as had its predecessors, was in the Ganges Delta in West Bengal. While the Vibrio cholerae bacteria had not been able to spread to western Europe until the 19th century, faster and improved modes of modern transportation, such as steamships and railways, reduced the duration of the journey considerably and facilitated the transmission of cholera and other infectious diseases. During the fourth 1863–1875 cholera pandemic, the third International Sanitary Conference convened in 1866 in Constantinople had identified religious pilgrimages to be "the most powerful of all causes" of cholera and again Hindu and Muslim pilgrimages were an important factor in the spread of the disease.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seventh cholera pandemic</span> Seventh major cholera pandemic

The seventh cholera pandemic is the seventh major outbreak of cholera beginning in 1961 and continuing to the present. Cholera has become endemic in many countries. In 2017, WHO announced a global strategy aiming to end the pandemic by 2030.

Although a variety of infectious diseases existed in the Americas in pre-Columbian times, the limited size of the populations, smaller number of domesticated animals with zoonotic diseases, and limited interactions between those populations hampered the transmission of communicable diseases. One notable infectious disease that may be of American origin is syphilis. Aside from that, most of the major infectious diseases known today originated in the Old World. The American era of limited infectious disease ended with the arrival of Europeans in the Americas and the Columbian exchange of microorganisms, including those that cause human diseases. Eurasian infections and epidemics had major effects on Native American life in the colonial period and nineteenth century, especially.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of cholera</span>

Seven cholera pandemics have occurred in the past 200 years, with the first pandemic originating in India in 1817. The seventh cholera pandemic is officially a current pandemic and has been ongoing since 1961, according to a World Health Organization factsheet in March 2022. Additionally, there have been many documented major local cholera outbreaks, such as a 1991–1994 outbreak in South America and, more recently, the 2016–2021 Yemen cholera outbreak.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second plague pandemic</span> Series of plague epidemics

The second plague pandemic was a major series of epidemics of plague that started with the Black Death, which reached medieval Europe in 1346 and killed up to half of the population of Eurasia in the next four years. It followed the first plague pandemic that began in the 6th century with the Plague of Justinian, but had ended in the 8th century. Although the plague died out in most places, it became endemic and recurred regularly. A series of major epidemics occurred in the late 17th century, and the disease recurred in some places until the late 18th century or the early 19th century. After this, a new strain of the bacterium gave rise to the third plague pandemic, which started in Asia around the mid-19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century</span> Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century reached epidemic proportions in the case of cholera

Diseases and epidemics of the 19th century included long-standing epidemic threats such as smallpox, typhus, yellow fever, and scarlet fever. In addition, cholera emerged as an epidemic threat and spread worldwide in six pandemics in the nineteenth century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cocoliztli epidemics</span> 16th century epidemics in New Spain

The Cocoliztli Epidemic or the Great Pestilence was an outbreak of a mysterious illness characterized by high fevers and bleeding which caused 5–15 million deaths in New Spain during the 16th century. The Aztec people called it cocoliztli, Nahuatl for pestilence. It ravaged the Mexican highlands in epidemic proportions, resulting in the demographic collapse of some Indigenous populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plague epidemics in Malta</span>

Several epidemics from the plague struck Malta from the medieval era until 1945, claiming almost 20,000 victims in at least ten epidemics over 350 years. After the first epidemics, preventive measures were installed, including a very active lazaret which issued patents of non-contagion for many ships plying the Mediterranean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1557 influenza pandemic</span>

In 1557, a pandemic strain of influenza emerged in Asia, then spread to Africa, Europe, and eventually the Americas. This flu was highly infectious and presented with intense, occasionally lethal symptoms. Medical historians like Thomas Short, Lazare Rivière and Charles Creighton gathered descriptions of catarrhal fevers recognized as influenza by modern physicians attacking populations with the greatest intensity between 1557 and 1559. The 1557 flu saw governments, for possibly the first time, inviting physicians to instill bureaucratic organization into epidemic responses. It is also the first pandemic where influenza is pathologically linked to miscarriages, given its first English names, and is reliably recorded as having spread globally. Influenza caused higher burial rates, near-universal infection, and economic turmoil as it returned in repeated waves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1580 influenza pandemic</span> Pandemic

In 1580 a severe influenza pandemic was recorded on several continents. The virus originated in Asia and spread along the Silk Road through the Middle East into Europe and Africa, where newly established maritime trade routes and moving armies facilitated its worldwide spread. Contemporary historian Johann Boekel wrote that it spread over all of Europe in six weeks, in which thousands died and nearly everyone was infected. Those who witnessed the epidemic variously called the disease nicknames like coqueluche,Shaufkrankeit,castrone, or variations of catarrh or fever. Physicians of the time increasingly appreciated that "epidemic catarrhs" were being directly caused by a contagious agent instead of the stars or environment.

The 1853 Stockholm cholera outbreak was a severe outbreak of cholera which occurred in Stockholm, Sweden in 1853 as part of the third cholera pandemic. It killed about 3,000 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1870 Barcelona yellow fever epidemic</span> Disease outbreak in Barcelona, Spain

The 1870 Barcelona yellow fever epidemic was an epidemic that took place in the Spanish city of Barcelona in 1870.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cholera epidemics in Luxembourg</span> Outbreaks of cholera in 19th-century Luxembourg

The first major cholera outbreak in Luxembourg was in 1827, with further outbreaks in 1832, 1849, 1854 and 1865. Due to population growth, poverty and poor hygiene conditions, outbreaks were relatively frequent in Luxembourg in the 19th century.

References

  1. Luis S.-Granjel Santander, Luis S. Granjel (1980). El cólera y la España ochocientas (in Spanish) (1st. ed.). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca. ISBN   84-7481-104-X.
  2. 1 2 Angolotti Cárdenas, E (1970). "Datos para la historia del cólera en España". Rev Sanid Hig Pública (in Spanish).
  3. 1 2 González de Sáman, Mariano (1859). Memoria histórica del cólera-morbo asiático en España (in Spanish). Vol. I. Imp. de Manuel Álvarez.
  4. Togores, Luis E. (January 27, 2021). "La epidemia de cólera de 1971". La Razón (in Spanish).
  5. 1 2 Rodríguez Cabezas, Ángel (2000). "Anotaciones descriptivas del último brote epidémico de cólera en España (1979)". Isla de Arriarán: Revista cultural y científica (in Spanish). 15. ISSN   1133-6293.
  6. Feo Parrondo, Francisco (2005). "La epidemia de cólera en San Fernando de Henares (1865)". Nimbus: Revista de climatología, meteorología y paisaje (15–16): 57–72. ISSN   1139-7136.
  7. Bentivoglio, M.; Pacini, P. (1995). "Filippo Pacini: A determined observer". Brain Research Bulletin. 38 (2): 161–5. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(95)00083-Q. PMID   7583342.
  8. Howard-Jones, N. (1984). "Robert Koch and the cholera vibrio: a centenary". BMJ. 288 (6414): 379–81. doi:10.1136/bmj.288.6414.379. PMC   1444283 . PMID   6419937.
  9. 1 2 Fernández García, Antonio (1979). "Enfermedad y sociedad el cólera de 1865 en Madrid". Cuadernos de investigación histórica (in Spanish) (3): 155–186. ISSN   0210-6272.
  10. Repertorio médico: periodico mensual que publica La sociedad de emulacion de Barcelona (in Spanish). Don Antonio Bergnes. 1842. Retrieved 2022-07-02.
  11. "El cólera fulminante de 1854". La Voz de Galicia (in Spanish). 2015-01-07.
  12. Carreras Velasco, Antonio (1996). "La última epidemia de cólera en el Jaén finisecular (1885)". Códice (in Spanish). 9 (10): 7–18.
  13. 1 2 "Santa Cruz, Muy Benéfica. El cólera de 1893". La Opinión de Tenerife (in Spanish). Retrieved March 29, 2019.
  14. "Señor de las Tribulaciones - Señor de Santa Cruz". Canarízame (in Spanish). 2012-04-03.
  15. Carrasco Asenjo, Miguel; Jimeno Maestro, Josefina (2007). "La epidemia de cólera de 1971. Negar la realidad". Revista de Administración Sanitaria Siglo XXI.
  16. Royal Order of June 2, 1833.
  17. Peral Pacheco, D. (1991). "El cólera y los cementerios en el siglo XIX". Norba - Revista de Historia (in Spanish).