Clear-air turbulence

For other uses, see Clear air turbulence (disambiguation).

In meteorology, clear-air turbulence (CAT) is the turbulent movement of air masses in the absence of any visual clues, such as clouds, and is caused when bodies of air moving at widely different speeds meet.

The atmospheric region most susceptible to CAT is the high troposphere at altitudes of around 7,000–12,000 metres (23,000–39,000 ft) as it meets the tropopause. Here CAT is most frequently encountered in the regions of jet streams. At lower altitudes it may also occur near mountain ranges. Thin cirrus clouds can also indicate high probability of CAT.

CAT can be hazardous to the comfort, and occasionally the safety, of air travelers. ^[1]

Definition

In meteorology, clear-air turbulence (CAT) is the turbulent movement of air masses in the absence of any visual clues, such as clouds, and is caused when bodies of air moving at widely different speeds meet. ^[2]

In aviation, CAT is defined as "the detection by aircraft of high-altitude inflight bumps in patchy regions devoid of significant cloudiness or nearby thunderstorm activity". ^[3] It was first noted in the 1940s. ^[4]

Detection

Clear-air turbulence is usually impossible to detect with the naked eye and very difficult to detect with a conventional radar, ^[5] with the result that it is difficult for aircraft pilots to detect and avoid it. However, it can be remotely detected with instruments that can measure turbulence with optical techniques, such as scintillometers, Doppler LIDARs, or N-slit interferometers. ^[6]

Factors

At typical heights where it occurs, the intensity and location cannot be determined precisely. However, because this turbulence affects long range aircraft that fly near the tropopause, CAT has been intensely studied. Several factors affect the likelihood of CAT. Often more than one factor is present.

As of 1965 it had been noted that 64% of the non-light turbulences (not only CAT) were observed less than 150 nautical miles (280 km) away from the core of a jet stream. Jet stream produces horizontal wind shear at its edges, caused by the different relative air speeds of the stream and the surrounding air. Wind shear, a difference in relative speed between two adjacent air masses, can produce vortices, and when of sufficient degree, the air will tend to move chaotically. ^[7]

A strong anticyclone vortex can also lead to CAT. ^[8]

Background information

A jet stream alone will rarely be the cause of CAT, although there is horizontal wind shear at its edges and within it.

Rossby waves caused by this jet stream shear and the Coriolis force cause it to meander.^{[ clarification needed ]}

Although the altitudes near the tropopause are usually cloudless, thin cirrus cloud can form where there are abrupt changes of air velocity, for example associated with jet streams. Lines of cirrus perpendicular to the jet stream indicate possible CAT, especially if the ends of the cirrus are dispersed, in which case the direction of dispersal can indicate if the CAT is stronger at the left or at the right of the jet stream.

A temperature gradient is the change of temperature over a distance in some given direction. Where the temperature of a gas changes, so does its density and where the density changes CAT can appear.

From the ground upwards through the troposphere temperature decreases with height; from the tropopause upwards through the stratosphere temperature increases with height. Such variations are examples of temperature gradients.

A horizontal temperature gradient may occur, and hence air density variations, where air velocity changes. An example: the speed of the jet stream is not constant along its length; additionally air temperature and hence density will vary between the air within the jet stream and the air outside.

Cirrus clouds often associated with clear-air turbulence

As is explained elsewhere in this article, temperature decreases and wind velocity increase with height in the troposphere, and the reverse is true within the stratosphere. These differences cause changes in air density, and hence viscosity. The viscosity of the air thus presents both inertias and accelerations which cannot be determined in advance.

Vertical wind shear above the jet stream (i.e., in the stratosphere) is sharper when it is moving upwards, because wind speed decreases with height in the stratosphere. This is the reason CAT can be generated above the tropopause, despite the stratosphere otherwise being a region which is vertically stable. On the other hand, vertical wind shear moving downwards within the stratosphere is more moderate (i.e., because downwards wind shear within the stratosphere is effectively moving against the manner in which wind speed changes within the stratosphere) and CAT is never produced in the stratosphere. Similar considerations apply to the troposphere but in reverse.

When strong wind deviates, the change of wind direction implies a change in the wind speed. A stream of wind can change its direction by differences of pressure. CAT appears more frequently when the wind is surrounding a low pressure region, especially with sharp troughs that change the wind direction more than 100°. Extreme CAT has been reported without any other factor than this.

Wind flow over a mountain produces oscillations (A), (B) etc.

Mountain waves are formed when four requirements are met. When these factors coincide with jet streams, CAT can occur:

• A mountain range, not an isolated mountain
• Strong perpendicular wind
• Wind direction maintained with altitude
• Temperature inversion at the top of the mountain range

The tropopause is a layer which separates two very different types of air. Beneath it, the air gets colder and the wind gets faster with height. Above it, the air warms and wind velocity decreases with height. These changes in temperature and velocity can produce fluctuation in the altitude of the tropopause, called gravity waves.

Effects on aircraft

In the context of air flight, CAT is sometimes colloquially referred to as "air pockets".^{[ citation needed ]}

Standard airplane radars cannot detect CAT, as CAT is not associated with clouds that show unpredictable movement of the air. Airlines and pilots should be aware of factors that cause or indicate CAT to reduce the probability of meeting turbulence.^{[ citation needed ]}

Aircraft in level flight rely on a constant air density to retain stability. Where air density is significantly different, for instance because of temperature gradient, especially at the tropopause, CAT can occur.^{[ citation needed ]}

Where an aircraft changes its position horizontally from within the jet stream to outside the jet stream, or vice versa, a horizontal temperature gradient may be experienced. Because jet streams meander, such a change of position need not be the result of a change of course by the aircraft.^{[ citation needed ]}

Because the altitude of the tropopause is not constant, an airplane that flies at a constant altitude would traverse it and encounter any associated CAT.^{[ citation needed ]}

Pilot rules

When a pilot experiences CAT, a number of rules should be applied: ^[9]

• The aircraft must sustain the recommended velocity for turbulence.
• When following the jet stream to escape from the CAT, the aircraft must change altitude and/or heading.
• When the CAT arrives from one side of the airplane, the pilot must observe the thermometer to determine whether the aircraft is above or below the jet stream and then move away from the tropopause.
• When the CAT is associated with a sharp trough, the plane must go through the low-pressure region instead of around it.
• The pilot may issue a Pilot Report (PIREP), communicating position, altitude and severity of the turbulence to warn other aircraft entering the region.

Cases

Because aircraft move so quickly, they can experience sudden unexpected accelerations or 'bumps' from turbulence, including CAT – as the aircraft rapidly cross invisible bodies of air which are moving vertically at many different speeds. Although the vast majority of cases of turbulence are harmless, in rare cases cabin crew and passengers on aircraft have been injured when tossed around inside an aircraft cabin during extreme turbulence. In a small number of cases, people have been killed.

• On March 5, 1966, BOAC Flight 911 from Tokyo to Hong Kong, a Boeing 707, broke up in CAT, with the loss of all persons (124) on board after experiencing severe lee-wave turbulence just downwind of Mount Fuji, Japan. The sequence of failure started with the vertical stabilizer getting ripped off.^{[ citation needed ]}
• On December 28, 1997 on United Airlines Flight 826, one person died. ^[10]
• On May 1, 2017, Aeroflot Flight 270 from Moscow to Bangkok, a Boeing 777, flew into clear air turbulence, and 27 passengers who were not buckled up sustained injuries. ^[11]
• On August 29, 2023, 11 people that were on a Delta Air Lines flight from Milan to Atlanta were sent to the hospital after “severe turbulence”. ^[12]

See also

• Continuous gusts
• Dryden Wind Turbulence Model
• Ellrod index
• N-slit interferometer
• von Kármán Wind Turbulence Model
• Wake turbulence

References

1. Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 93. ISBN   9780850451634.
2. Stull, B. R., 1988 An introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwert Academic Publishers 666 pp.
3. Chambers, E., 1955: Clear air turbulence and civil jet operation. J. Roy. Aeronaut. Soc.,59, 613–628.
4. Baughman, E. E., Jr., 1946: Turbulence with a stable lapse rate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,27, 459–462.
5. John J. Hicks, Isadore Katz, Claude R. Landry, and Kenneth R. Hardy, "Clear-Air Turbulence: Simultaneous Observations by Radar and Aircraft" Science. 18 August 1967: Vol. 157. no. 3790, pp. 808–809
6. F. J. Duarte, T. S. Taylor, A. B. Clark, and W. E. Davenport, "The N-slit interferometer: an extended configuration", J. Opt.12, 015705 (2010).
7. Binding, A. A. "Association of clear-air turbulence with 300 mb contour patterns". The Meteorological Magazine94 (1965): 11–19.
8. Knox, John A. (1997-06-01). "Possible Mechanisms of Clear-Air Turbulence in Strongly Anticyclonic Flows". Monthly Weather Review. 125 (6): 1251–1259. Bibcode:1997MWRv..125.1251K. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1251:PMOCAT>2.0.CO;2 . ISSN   1520-0493.
9. Lankford, Terry T. (2001). Controlling Pilot Error:Weather. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 49–53. ISBN   978-0-07-137328-9.
10. "Killer turbulence hits flight". BBC News .
11. Ross, Alice (1 May 2017). "Severe turbulence on Aeroflot flight to Bangkok leaves 27 people injured". The Guardian . Retrieved 30 June 2018.
12. Jeong, Andrew (30 August 2023). "11 injured in 'severe turbulence' on Delta flight from Milan to Atlanta". The Washington Post . Retrieved 30 August 2023.

External links

• Brace for Turbulence
• Clear Air Turbulence Forecast (USA)
• Sharman, R. D.; J.D. Doyle; M.A. Shapiro (Jan 2012). "An Investigation of a Commercial Aircraft Encounter with Severe Clear-Air Turbulence over Western Greenland". J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 51 (1): 42–53. Bibcode:2012JApMC..51...42S. doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-044.1 .
• Williams, P. D.; M. Joshi (2013). "Intensification of winter transatlantic aviation turbulence in response to climate change". Nature Climate Change. 3 (7): 644–648. Bibcode:2013NatCC...3..644W. doi:10.1038/nclimate1866.