Contaminants of emerging concern

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) is a term used by water quality professionals to describe pollutants that have been detected in environmental monitoring samples, that may cause ecological or human health impacts, and typically are not regulated under current environmental laws. Sources of these pollutants include agriculture, urban runoff and ordinary household products (such as soaps and disinfectants) and pharmaceuticals that are disposed to sewage treatment plants and subsequently discharged to surface waters. ^{[1] [2]}

Examples of emerging contaminants are 1,4-Dioxane, food additives, pharmaceuticals, and natural & synthetic hormones. ^[3] CECs have the ability to enter the water cycle after being discharged as waste through the process of runoff making its way into rivers, directly through effluent discharge, or by the process of seepage and infiltration into the water table, eventually entering the public water supply system. ^[4] Emerging contaminants are known to cause endocrine disrupting activity and other toxic mechanisms, some are recognized as known carcinogens by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ^[5]

General problem

For a compound to be recognized as an emerging contaminant it has to meet at least two requirements:^{[ according to whom? ]}

1. Adverse human health effects have been associated with a compound.
2. There is an established relationship between the positive and negative effect(s) of the compound.

Emerging contaminants are those which have not previously been detected through water quality analysis, or have been found in small concentrations with uncertainty as to their effects. The risk they pose to human or environmental health is not fully understood.^{[ citation needed ]}

Contaminant classes

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) can be broadly classed into several categories of chemicals such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, cyanotoxins, nanoparticles, and flame retardants, among others. ^[6] However, these classifications are constantly changing as new contaminants (or effects) are discovered and emerging contaminants from past years become less of a priority. These contaminants can generally be categorized as truly "new" contaminants that have only recently been discovered and researched, contaminants that were known about but their environmental effects were not fully understood, or "old" contaminants that have new information arising regarding their risks. ^[6]

Pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceuticals are gaining more attention as CECs because of their continual introduction into the environment and their general lack of regulation. ^[7] These compounds are often present at low concentrations in water bodies and little is currently known about their environmental and health effects from chronic exposure; pharmaceuticals are only now becoming a focus in toxicology due to improved analytical techniques that allow very low concentrations to be detected. ^[7] There are several sources of pharmaceuticals in the environment, including most prominently effluent from sewage treatment plants, aquaculture and agricultural runoff. ^[8]

Cyanotoxins

The growth of cyanobacterial blooms has been increasing due to the eutrophication (or increase in nutrient levels) of surface waters around the world. ^[9] The increase in nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus has been linked to fertilizer runoff from agricultural fields and the use of products such as detergents in urban spaces. ^[10] These blooms can release toxins that can decrease water quality and are a risk to human and wildlife health. ^[9] Additionally, there is a lack of regulations regarding the maximum contaminant levels (MCL) allowed in drinking water sources. ^[10] Cyanotoxins can have both acute and chronic toxic effects, and there are often many consequences for the health of the environment where these occur as well. ^[10]

Industrial chemicals

Industrial chemicals from various industries are known to produce harmful chemicals that are known to cause harm to human health and the environment. Common industrial chemicals like 1,4-Dioxanes, Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are commonly found in various water sources.

Adverse human health effects

Due to the large differences in transportability of compounds, there is a great level of variance contaminant to contaminant between the location of contamination and the place of occurring hazards. An example of the a contaminant which can have detected hazards at the point of origin is the effect of municipal solid waste on the environment through seepage and particulate pollution. On the other hand, the effects of water-soluble contaminants may be obscured a long time as they are washed far away from the contamination site and only slowly accumulate in oceans and groundwater to harmful concentrations.

Relation between compound and effects

There is an overlap of many anthropogenically sourced chemicals that humans are exposed to regularly. This makes it difficult to attribute negative health causality to a specific, isolated compound. EPA manages a Contaminant Candidate List to review substances that may need to be controlled in public water systems. ^[11] EPA has also listed twelve contaminants of emerging concern at federal facilities, with ranging origins, health effects, and means of exposure. ^[12] The twelve listed contaminants are as follows: Trichloropropane (TCP), Dioxane, Trinitrotoluene (TNT), Dinitrotoluene, Hexahydro-trinitro-triazane (RDX), N-nitroso-dimethylamine (NDMA), Perchlorate, Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), Tungsten, Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and Nanomaterials.

Selected compounds listed as emerging contaminants

The NORMAN network ^[13] enhances the exchange of information on emerging environmental substances. A Suspect List Exchange ^[14] (SLE) has been created to allow sharing of the many potential contaminants of emerging concern. The list contains more than 100,000 chemicals.

Table 1 is a summary of emerging contaminants currently listed on one EPA website and a review article. Detailed use and health risk of commonly identified CECs are listed in the table below. ^{[5] [15]}

Compound	Uses	Where it is Found	Health Risks
Trichloropropane (TCP)	Chemical intermediate, solvent, and cleaning product	TCPs are denser than water, so they sink to the bottom of aquifers and contaminate them, they also have a low capacity to be absorbed organically and leach into soil or evaporate, contaminating the air	Considered a likely carcinogen by NOAA
Dioxane	Stabilizer of chlorinated solvents, manufacturing of PET, manufacturing by-product	Often at industrial sites, and they move rapidly from soil to groundwater, although it was phased out as part of the Montreal Protocol it is very resistant to bio-degradation and has been found at over 34 EPA sites	Rapid disruption of lung, liver, kidney, spleen, colon, and muscle tissue, may be toxic to developing fetuses and is a potential carcinogen
Trinitrotoluene (TNT)	Pure explosive, military and underwater blasting	Major contaminant of groundwater and soils	Listed as cancer-causing by Office of Environmental Health, may cause carcinoma and bladder papilloma
Dinitrotoluene	Intermediate to form TNT, explosive	Found in surface water, groundwater, and soil at hazardous waste sites, and may be released into the air as dust or aerosols	Considered a hepatocarcinogen and may cause ischemic heart disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and urothelial and renal cell cancers
Hexahydro-trinitro-triazane (RDX)	Military explosive	Exists as particulate matter in the atmosphere, easily leaches into groundwater and aquifers from soil, does not readily evaporate from water	Decreased body weight, kidney and liver damage, possible carcinoma, insomnia, nausea, and tremor
Nanomaterials	Broad classification of ultrafine particulate matter used in more than 1,800 consumer products and biomedical applications	Released as consumer waste or spillage, may be airborne, found in food, or in many diverse industrial processes	May translocate into the circulatory system primarily through the lungs, exposing the body to an accumulation of compounds in the liver, spleen, kidney, and brain
N-nitroso-dimethylamine (NDMA)	Formed in the production of antioxidants, additives, softeners, and rocket fuel, and an unintended byproduct of the chlorination of waste and drinking water at treatment facilities	Broken down quickly when released into the air, but highly mobile when released into soil and will likely leach into groundwater, humans may be exposed by drinking contaminated water, ingesting contaminated food, or using products that contain NDMA	Probable carcinogen, evidence of liver damage, reduced function of kidneys and lungs
Perchlorate	Manufacturing and combustion of solid rocket propellants, munitions, fireworks, airbag initiators, and flares	Highly soluble in water so it can greatly accumulate in groundwater, also accumulates in some food crop leaves and milk	Eye, skin, and respiratory irritation and in high volumes corrosion. Potentially disrupts thyroid hormones
Perfluoro-octane sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)	Used in additives and coatings, non-stick cookware, waterproof clothing, cardboard packaging, wire casing, and resistant tubing	During manufacturing, the compounds were released into the surrounding air, ground, and water, is resistant to typical environmental degradation processes and have been shown to bioaccumulate, found in oceans and Arctic, meaning they have a high capacity for transport	World Health Organization categorized possible carcinogen, may cause high cholesterol, increased liver enzymes, and adverse reproductive and developmental effects
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs)	Flame retardant	Detected in the air, sediments, surface water, fish and other marine animals, they do not dissolve so they are not mobile in water but are volatile and prevalent in the atmosphere	Classified by International Agency for Research on Cancer as likely carcinogenic, neurotoxic, and thyroid, liver, and kidney toxicity as well as an endocrine disruptor
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)	Flame retardant and used in plastics, furniture, and other household products	Enter the environment through emissions, and has been detected in air, sediments, surface water, fish and other marine animals	Shown to be an endocrine disruptor as well as carcinogenic, also, may cause neural, liver, pancreatic, and thyroid toxicity
Tungsten	A naturally occurring element which exists in various household products and military manufacturing	Tungsten is water-soluble under certain conditions and may be found in dangerous quantities in water sources	May cause respiratory complications, and investigated as a potential carcinogen by the CDC
Diclofenac	Anti-inflammatory drug	Can be found in water treatment plant (WTP) effluents. Reported to be found in coastal waters as well	In large quantities can cause serious gastrointestinal toxicity. Severe ecotoxicity to selected breeds of animals
Bisphenol A (BPA)	Industrial plastic production (polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins)	Found to accumulate in water treatment plant (WTP) effluents	BPA is cytotoxic and mutagenic. It exerts various adverse effects on reproductive, immune, endocrine and nervous systems
Sulfamethoxazole (SMX)	Antibiotics	Reported to be found in various freshwater systems	Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, and skin rashes. It is a sulfonamide and bacteriostatic
Carbamazepine	Anticonvulsant	Reported to be found in various freshwater systems and WTP effluents.	Common side effects include nausea and drowsiness. Serious side effects may include skin rashes, decreased bone marrow function, suicidal thoughts, or confusion.

Examples from the past

• In the 19th and early 20th centuries asbestos was used in many products and in building construction, and was not considered a threat to human health or the environment. Deaths and lung problems caused by asbestos were first documented in the early 20th century. ^[16] The first regulations of the asbestos industry were published in the UK in the 1930s. ^[17] Regulation of asbestos in the US did not occur until the 1980s. ^[18]
• In the 1970s there was a serious issue with the water treatment infrastructure of some US states, notably in Southern California with water sourced from the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta.^{[ citation needed ]} Water was being disinfected for domestic use through chlorine treatment, which was effective for killing microbial contaminants and bacteria, but in some cases, it reacted with runoff chemicals and organic matter to form trihalomethanes (THMs). Research done in the subsequent years began to suggest the carcinogenic and harmful nature of this category of compounds. EPA issued its first standard for THMs, applicable to public water systems, in 1979, ^[19] and more stringent standards in 1998 ^[20] and 2006. ^[21]
• Rapid industry changes also make the treatment and regulation of CECs particularly challenging. For instance, the replacing substance (GenX), for the recently regulated perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a PFAS, had a more detrimental environmental impact, resulting in the subsequently banning of GenX as well. ^[15] Hence, there is a pressing need for the treatment and management of CECs to keep up with global trends.

Risks and regulations

Further information: Water pollution

Emerging contaminants are most often addressed as an issue concerning water quality. The release of harmful compounds into the environment which find their way into municipal food, water, and homes have a negative externality on social welfare. These contaminants have the capability to travel far from the point-source of their pollution into the environment and accumulate over time to become harmful because they have been left unregulated by federal agencies. These harmful compounds cause damage to environmental and human health, and they are difficult to trace therefore it is challenging to establish who should foot the bill for the damage done by ECs. Because these contaminants were not detected or regulated in the past, existing treatment plants are ill-equipped to remove them from domestic water. ^[22] There are sites with waste that would take hundreds of years to clean up and prevent further seepage and contamination into the water table and surrounding biosphere. In the United States, the environmental regulatory agencies on the federal level are primarily responsible for determining standards and statutes which guide policy and control in the state to prevent citizens and the environment from being exposed to harmful compounds. Emerging contaminants are examples of instances in which regulation did not do what it was supposed to, and communities have been left vulnerable to adverse health effects. Many states have assessed what can be done about emerging contaminants and currently view it as a serious issue, but only eight states have specific risk management programs addressing emerging contaminants. ^[23]

Solutions

These are tactics and methods that aim to remediate the effects of certain, or all, CECs by preventing movement throughout the environment, or limiting their concentrations in certain environmental systems. It is particularly important to ensure that water treatment approaches do not simply move contaminants from effluent to sludge given the potential for sludge to be spread to land providing an alternative route to entering the environment.

Advanced treatment plant technology

For some emerging contaminants, several advanced technologies—sonolysis, photocatalysis, ^[15] Fenton-based oxidation ^[24] and ozonation—have treated pollutants in laboratory experiments. ^[25] Another technology is "enhanced coagulation" in which the treatment entity would work to optimize filtration by removing precursors to contamination through treatment. In the case of THMs, this meant lowering the pH, increasing the feed rate of coagulants, and encouraging domestic systems to operate with activated carbon filters and apparatuses that can perform reverse osmosis. ^[26] Although these methods are effective, they are costly, and there have been many instances of treatment plants being resistant to pay for the removal of pollution, especially if it wasn't created in the water treatment process as many EC's occur from runoff, past pollution sources, and personal care products. It is also difficult to incentivize states to have their own policies surrounding contamination because it can be burdensome for states to pay for screening and prevention processes. There is also an element of environmental injustice, in that lower income communities with less purchasing and political power cannot buy their own system for filtration, and are regularly exposed to harmful compounds in drinking water and food. ^[27] However recent treads for Light-based systems shows great potential for such applications. With the decrease in cost of UV-LED systems and growing prevalence of solar powered systems, ^[15] it shows great potential to remove CECs while keeping cost low.

Metal–organic framework-based nano-adsorbent remediation

Researchers have suggested that metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF-based nano-adsorbents (MOF-NAs) could be used in the removal of certain CECs like pharmaceuticals and personal care products, especially in wastewater treatment. Widespread use of MOF-based nano-adsorbents has yet to be implemented due to complications created by the vast physicochemical properties that CECs contain. The removal of CECs largely depends on the structure and porosity of the MOF-NAs and the physicochemical compatibility of both the CECs and the MOF-NAs. ^[28] If a CEC is not compatible with the MOF-NA, then particular functional groups can be chemically added to increase compatibility between the two molecules. The addition of functional groups causes the reactions to rely on other chemical processes and mechanisms, such as hydrogen bonding, acid-base reactions, and complex electrostatic forces. ^[28] MOF-based nano-adsorbent remediation heavily relies on water-qualities, such as pH, in order for the reaction to be executed efficiently. MOF-NA remediation can also be used to efficiently remove other heavy metals and organic compounds in wastewater treatment.

Membrane bioreactors

Another method of possible remediation for CECs is through the use of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) that act through mechanisms of sorption and biodegradation. Membrane bioreactors have shown results on being able to filter out certain solutes and chemicals from wastewater through methods of microfiltration, but due to the extremely small size of CECs, MBRs must rely on other mechanisms in order to ensure the removal of CECs. One mechanism that MBRs use to remove CECs from wastewater is sorption. Sorption of the CECs to sludge deposits in the MBR's system can allow the deposits to sit and be bombarded with water, causing the eventual biodegradation of CECs in the membrane. Sorption of a particular CEC can be even more efficient in the system if the CEC is hydrophobic, causing it to move from the wastewater to the sludge deposits more quickly. ^[29]

References

1. "Contaminants of Emerging Concern including Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products". Water Quality Criteria. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2019-08-19.
2. "Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Environment". Environmental Health—Toxic Substances Hydrology Program. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. 2017-06-16.
3. Shahid, Muhammad Kashif; Kashif, Ayesha; Fuwad, Ahmed; Choi, Younggyun (2021). "Current advances in treatment technologies for removal of emerging contaminants from water – A critical review". Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 442: 213993. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213993.
4. Naddeo, Vincenzo (2020-09-10). "Development of environmental biotechnology and control of emerging biological contaminants: the grand challenge for a sustainable future". Water Environment Research. Wiley. 92 (9): 1246–1248. doi:10.1002/wer.1439. PMID   32914513. S2CID   221619804.
5. "Emerging Contaminants and Federal Facility Contaminants of Concern". EPA. 2019-04-04.
6. Sauvé, Sébastien; Desrosiers, Mélanie (2014-02-26). "A review of what is an emerging contaminant". Chemistry Central Journal. 8 (1): 15. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-15 . ISSN   1752-153X. PMC   3938815 . PMID   24572188.
7. Rivera-Utrilla, José; Sánchez-Polo, Manuel; Ferro-García, María Ángeles; Prados-Joya, Gonzalo; Ocampo-Pérez, Raúl (2013-10-01). "Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review". Chemosphere. 93 (7): 1268–1287. Bibcode:2013Chmsp..93.1268R. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.059. ISSN   0045-6535. PMID   24025536.
8. Bottoni, P.; Caroli, S.; Caracciolo, A. Barra (2010-03-01). "Pharmaceuticals as priority water contaminants". Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry. 92 (3): 549–565. doi:10.1080/02772241003614320. ISSN   0277-2248. S2CID   98011532.
9. Bláha, Luděk; Babica, Pavel; Maršálek, Blahoslav (2009-01-01). "Toxins produced in cyanobacterial water blooms - toxicity and risks". Interdisciplinary Toxicology. 2 (2): 36–41. doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0006-2. ISSN   1337-9569. PMC   2984099 . PMID   21217843.
10. Antoniou, Maria G.; de la Cruz, Armah A.; Dionysiou, Dionysios D. (2005-09-01). "Cyanotoxins: New Generation of Water Contaminants". Journal of Environmental Engineering. 131 (9): 1239–1243. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:9(1239) . ISSN   0733-9372.
11. "Basic Information on the CCL and Regulatory Determination". EPA. 2019-07-19.
12. One example of a listed chemical is RDX, an explosive. "Technical Fact Sheet – Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX)" (PDF). EPA. November 2017. EPA 505-F-17-008.
13. "NORMAN network" . Retrieved 30 October 2022.
14. "Suspect List Exchange" . Retrieved 30 October 2022.
15. Lee, Brandon Chuan Yee; Lim, Fang Yee; Loh, Wei Hao; Ong, Say Leong; Hu, Jiangyong (January 2021). "Emerging Contaminants: An Overview of Recent Trends for Their Treatment and Management Using Light-Driven Processes". Water. 13 (17): 2340. doi: 10.3390/w13172340 .
16. Cooke, W.E. (26 July 1924). "Fibrosis of the Lungs Due to the Inhalation of Asbestos Dust". Br Med J. London: British Medical Association. 2 (3317): 140–2, 147. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.3317.147. ISSN   0959-8138. PMC   2304688 . PMID   20771679.
17. "Asbestos and Cencer Risk". What Causes Cancer?. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. 2015-09-15.
18. "Asbestos Laws and Regulations". EPA. 2020-04-08.
19. EPA (1979-11-29). "National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Control of Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water; Final rule." Federal Register,44 FR 68624
20. EPA (1998-12-16). "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts; Final rule." 63 FR 69390
21. EPA (2006-01-04). "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule; Final rule." 71 FR 388
22. Gogoi, Anindita (March 2018). "Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: A review". Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 6: 169–180. doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009.
23. Anderson, Janet. "EC State Summary Report" (PDF). integral-corp.com. Integral Consulting. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-03-31.
24. Cai, Q.Q.; Lee, B.C.Y.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J.Y. (2021-02-15). "Fluidized-bed Fenton technologies for recalcitrant industrial wastewater treatment–Recent advances, challenges and perspective". Water Research. 190: 116692. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116692. ISSN   0043-1354. PMID   33279748. S2CID   227523802.
25. Fraiese A, Naddeo V, Uyguner-Demirel CS, Prado M, Cesaro A, Zarra T, Liu H, Belgiorno V, Ballesteros F (2019). "Removal of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater by Sonolysis, Photocatalysis and Ozonation". Global NEST Journal. 21 (2): 98–105. doi: 10.30955/gnj.002625 .
26. Talib, Ammara; Randhir, Timothy O. (2016-01-27). "Managing Emerging Contaminants: Status, Impacts, and Watershed-Wide Strategies". Exposure and Health. 8 (1): 143–158. doi:10.1007/s12403-015-0192-4. ISSN   2451-9766. S2CID   131316712.
27. Bellinger, David C. (2016-03-24). "Lead Contamination in Flint — An Abject Failure to Protect Public Health". New England Journal of Medicine. 374 (12): 1101–1103. doi: 10.1056/nejmp1601013 . ISSN   0028-4793. PMID   26863114.
28. Joseph, Lesley; Jun, Byung-Moon; Jang, Min; Park, Chang Min; Muñoz-Senmache, Juan C.; Hernández-Maldonado, Arturo J.; Heyden, Andreas; Yu, Miao; Yoon, Yeomin (August 2019). "Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by metal-organic framework nanoadsorbents: A review". Chemical Engineering Journal. 369: 928–946. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.173 . ISSN   1385-8947. S2CID   109055182.
29. Krzeminski, Pawel; Tomei, Maria Concetta; Karaolia, Popi; Langenhoff, Alette; Almeida, C. Marisa R.; Felis, Ewa; Gritten, Fanny; Andersen, Henrik Rasmus; Fernandes, Telma; Manaia, Celia M.; Rizzo, Luigi (January 2019). "Performance of secondary wastewater treatment methods for the removal of contaminants of emerging concern implicated in crop uptake and antibiotic resistance spread: A review". Science of the Total Environment. 648: 1052–108 1. Bibcode:2019ScTEn.648.1052K. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.130. hdl: 11250/2625198 . ISSN   0048-9697. PMID   30340253. S2CID   53009654.