Dan A. Polster | |
---|---|
Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio | |
Assumed office January 31, 2021 | |
Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio | |
In office August 3,1998 –January 31,2021 | |
Appointed by | Bill Clinton |
Preceded by | David Dudley Dowd Jr. |
Succeeded by | Bridget M. Brennan |
Personal details | |
Born | Cleveland,Ohio,U.S. | December 6,1951
Education | Harvard University (BA,JD) |
Dan Aaron Polster (born December 6,1951) is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Polster mediated a settlement between the city of Cleveland and the family of Tamir Rice,a 12-year-old black boy who was killed by a white police officer in 2014. In December 2017,a federal judicial panel selected Polster to preside over more than 3,000 consolidated prescription opioid-related lawsuits in multidistrict litigation known as the National Prescription Opiate Litigation. A trial for the litigation began in October 2021.
Born in Cleveland,Polster received a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard College in 1972 and earned a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1976. He was a trial attorney in the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice from 1976 to 1982,and an assistant United States attorney in the Northern District of Ohio from 1982 to 1998. [1]
On July 31,1997,Polster was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio vacated by David Dudley Dowd Jr. Polster was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 31,1998,and received his commission on August 3,1998. He assumed senior status on January 31,2021. [2] [3]
Polster helped to mediate a lawsuit over limits on protests at the 2016 Republican National Convention. [4]
Polster mediated a settlement between the city of Cleveland and the family of Tamir Rice,a 12-year-old black boy who was killed by a white police officer in 2014. [5] Rice's mother said "It's disturbing that I had to put a price on my son,that I was forced to make a decision I didn't want to make." She said she is angry and frustrated that no one has been held accountable for her son's death. [6] The settlement meant that there would not be answers to some of the questions raised in the civil lawsuit,including whether dispatchers passed along sufficient information to the police and whether the department erred in hiring the officer who killed Rice. Some experts have questioned whether the settlement will lead to adequate reforms of the police department. [7] [8]
In February 2017,Polster said that comments made by Donald Trump criticizing federal judges called the president's legitimacy into question. [9]
Polster mediated settlements in 700 cases involving medical contract dye. [10] Of mediation,Polster has said "Sometimes I feel like I am a therapist,or a rabbi or a priest. I had to train myself to lean in to the emotions. For lawyers,it is just the facts–forget the feelings and emotions." [11] He has said "I can do things,as a judge,that no one else can,because I am the judge. I also use my courtroom in the mediation. Mediation is qualitatively different if the party is sitting in the very courtroom,the very seat,he or she will be in if the case is tried in front of the jury box. I use that!" [11]
Polster rejected arguments from Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose to limit the use of ballot drop boxes in the 2020 election. [12] LaRose immediately appealed the decision. [13] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit granted an injunction against Polster's ruling,leaving the ultimate decision to be made after election day. The appeals court ruled that "Ohio's restrictions are reasonable and non-discriminatory" and that the state "offers many ways to vote." [14] The plaintiffs dropped the case on October 22,facing the possibility of $40,000 in court costs. [14]
In December 2017,a federal judicial panel selected Polster to preside over more than 3,000 consolidated prescription opioid-related lawsuits in multidistrict litigation known as the National Prescription Opiate Litigation. [15] The multidistrict litigation is a master case designed to simultaneously resolve all opioid lawsuits against drug companies and pharmacies. The defendants include makers of prescription painkillers,companies that distribute them,and pharmacies that dispense them. Legal experts have described the opioid litigation as the largest and most complex civil lawsuit in U.S. history. [16]
During the case's first hearing in January 2018,Polster told lawyers that he planned to dispense with legal norms like discovery and ordered lawyers to immediately prepare for settlement discussions. The New York Times reported that many lawyers on both sides "were scathing,questioning his grasp of the issues and predicting that a stepped-up timetable was bound to collapse." [10] [17] In September 2019,attorneys for eight drug distributors sought to disqualify Polster from the case,saying his public comments about his intention to get plaintiffs help showed evidence of bias. Attorneys cited Polster's January 2018 remark that "My objective is to do something meaningful to abate the [opioid] crisis and to do it in 2018." [18] [19] Polster declined to step aside. [20]
In April 2019,Polster barred the media from court proceedings in the opioid lawsuit. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press criticized this move,saying "the public is presumed to have the right of access to proceedings in civil cases." [21] Polster issued a gag order limiting the ability of attorneys to speak publicly about the litigation. [22] An investigation by Reuters "showed that Polster has been more willing to seal documents than other judges involved in opioid litigation,raising concerns that important information about the crisis remains secret." [23]
In June 2019,a three-judge panel of the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Polster's blocking of the release of court records in opioid cases was inappropriate. [24] [25]
In April 2020,the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a sharp rebuke of Polster,writing that his pretrial ruling allowing plaintiffs to add new claims more than a year after the deadline was a "clear abuse of discretion." [26] Judge Raymond Kethledge wrote that multidistrict litigation is "not some kind of judicial border country,where the rules are few and the law rarely makes an appearance." [27]
In September 2020,the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed Polster's 2019 approval of the nation's first "negotiation class." Judge Eric L. Clay wrote that "the district court simply is not authorized by the structure,framework,or language of Rule 23," referring to Federal Rule 23 of Civil Procedure,which governs class action lawsuits. [28]
Polster has a history of encouraging parties to settle their cases outside of court. [29] He has been clear about his preference for a settlement rather than a trial in the opioid litigation,saying at an initial hearing that "we don't need a lot of briefs and we don't need trials." [23] Polster warned pharmaceutical companies that they would face bankruptcy if they did not settle. [30] Legal Newsline wrote that in doing so,Polster "demonstrated why plaintiff lawyers love the strategy so much:Because it is extremely effective at extracting settlements from the companies they sue." [31]
The multidistrict opioid litigation is thought to have wide-reaching legal implications. Writing for National Review,Jack Fowler said "Somewhat off America's radar screen is a legal case,of the huge-implications variety,that is not only vast and complex but also a nose-thumbing to those (naïvely?) believing that social policy should be set by the people's legislative representatives,and not by judges." [32] In The Wall Street Journal,Yale law professor Abbe Gluck wrote,"What began as a single opioid lawsuit in Ohio is now the only such case that matters. Every significant opioid lawsuit in the U.S. has been lumped together into a giant case before one federal judge in Cleveland who has declared his extraordinary ambition to 'solve' the crisis in 2018." Gluck asked,"Is a federal courtroom,presided over by a single judge,a better forum for making policy than 50 state legislatures or Congress?" [33]
The trial,which was originally scheduled for October 2020,was delayed due to COVID-19. A number of companies settled prior to trial,while other companies,including Walmart and Walgreens,elected to go to trial. Polster initially said he would automatically disqualify any potential jurors who were not vaccinated against COVID-19. He later reversed this order. [34]
The trial began in October 2021. [35] [36] In the trial,lawyers for the plaintiffs claimed the pharmacies "dispensed like a vending machine" and failed to identify signs of drug misuse. A lawyer for one of the defendant companies said that others,including doctors,were instead to blame for the rise in prescriptions. [37]
Three weeks into the six week trial,a juror committed grave misconduct by giving fellow jurors a printout from her home computer that cast doubt on testimony by a witness from Walgreens. All four defendants in the trial—Walgreens,Walmart,Giant Eagle Inc.,and CVS—sought a mistrial due to the juror's misconduct. The Ohio counties' lead trial lawyer initially said it would be appropriate to declare a mistrial,but later changed his mind. Polster denied the mistrial motions. [38] [39]
On November 23,2021,the jury found CVS,Walgreens,and Walmart liable for creating a public nuisance by contributing to the U.S. opioid crisis. The jury only decided liability,and now Polster will decide how much the companies will have to pay in damages. [40] The companies have announced plans to appeal the verdict,saying that pharmacists only dispensed prescriptions written by licensed health care providers. [41] Some experts expect the verdict to be set aside due to juror misconduct,and for an appeals court to order a retrial. [42] Similar public nuisance arguments in other opioid lawsuits have been rejected in California and Oklahoma. [43] The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal critiqued the Ohio verdict,writing "The jury verdict distorts product liability and public-nuisance law since opioids are legal products and pharmacies had no control over how they were used by customers. If the verdict stands,or the companies settle,the precedent could lead to similar nuisance suits across much of the U.S. economy." [44]
In August 2022,Polster ruled that CVS,Walgreens,and Walmart pharmacies must pay $650.5 million in damages to Lake County and Trumbull County in Ohio for contributing to the opioid epidemic in those areas. [45]
A lawsuit is a proceeding by one or more parties against one or more parties in a civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today. The term "lawsuit" is used with respect to a civil action brought by a plaintiff who requests a legal remedy or equitable remedy from a court. The defendant is required to respond to the plaintiff's complaint or else risk default judgment. If the plaintiff is successful, judgment is entered in favor of the defendant. A variety of court orders may be issued in connection with or as part of the judgment to enforce a right, award damages or restitution, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to prevent an act or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal disputes.
Walgreens is an American company that operates the second-largest pharmacy store chain in the United States, behind CVS Health. It specializes in filling prescriptions, health and wellness products, health information, and photo services. It was founded in Chicago in 1901, and is headquartered in the Chicago suburb of Deerfield, Illinois. On December 31, 2014, Walgreens and Switzerland-based Alliance Boots merged to form a new holding company, Walgreens Boots Alliance. Walgreens became a subsidiary of the new company, which retained its Deerfield headquarters and trades on the Nasdaq under the symbol WBA. In 2021 the company was found by a federal jury to have "substantially contributed to" the opioid crisis.
Cencora, Inc., formerly known as AmerisourceBergen, is an American drug wholesale company and a contract research organization that was formed by the merger of Bergen Brunswig and AmeriSource in 2001.
Rite Aid Corporation is an American drugstore chain based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was founded in 1962 in Scranton, Pennsylvania, by Alex Grass under the name Thrift D Discount Center. It is the third-largest drugstore chain in the United States, with over 2,000 stores, and ranked No. 148 in the Fortune 500 in 2022.
The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is a special body within the United States federal court system which manages multidistrict litigation. It was established by Congress in 1968 by Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law 90–296, and has the authority to determine whether civil actions pending in two or more federal judicial districts should be transferred to a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings. If such cases are determined to involve one or more common questions of fact and are transferred, the Panel will then select the district court and assign a judge or judges to preside over the litigation. The purpose of the transfer or "centralization" process is to conserve the resources of the parties and their counsel, as well as the judiciary, thus avoiding duplication of discovery and preventing inconsistent pretrial rulings.
In United States law, multidistrict litigation (MDL) refers to a special federal legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex cases, such as air disaster litigation or complex product liability suits.
Purdue Pharma L.P., formerly the Purdue Frederick Company (1892–2019), was an American privately held pharmaceutical company founded by John Purdue Gray. It was sold to Arthur, Mortimer, and Raymond Sackler in 1952, and then owned principally by the Sackler family and their descendants.
CVS Health Corporation is an American healthcare company that owns CVS Pharmacy, a retail pharmacy chain; CVS Caremark, a pharmacy benefits manager; and Aetna, a health insurance provider, among many other brands. The company is the world's largest healthcare company, and its headquarters are in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. In 2023, the company was ranked 65th in the Forbes Global 2000.
A mass tort is a civil action involving numerous plaintiffs against one or a few defendants in state or federal court. The lawsuits arise out of the defendants causing numerous injuries through the same or similar act of harm.
William Mark Lanier is an American trial lawyer and founder and CEO of the Lanier Law Firm. He has led a number of high-profile product litigation suits resulting in billions of dollars in damages, including Johnson & Johnson baby powder and Merck & Co.'s Vioxx drug.
Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that a district court conducting coordinated pretrial proceedings in multiple cases by designation of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) has no authority to reassign a transferred case to itself for the actual trial of the case. The Court's decision overturned numerous lower-court decisions upholding what had become a common practice in multi-district cases.
John Randell Adams Jr. is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Eldon E. Fallon is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Referred as a pioneer in the creative use of multidistrict litigations and bellwether trials, Fallon has overseen several high-profile multidistrict litigation cases in recent years, including the Xarelto, Chinese Drywall, Vioxx, and Propulsid litigations.
Donald Clark Nugent is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
On November 22, 2014, Tamir E. Rice, a 12-year-old African American boy, was killed in Cleveland, Ohio, by Timothy Loehmann, a 26-year-old white police officer. Rice was carrying a replica toy gun; Loehmann shot him almost immediately upon arriving on the scene. Two officers, Loehmann and 46-year-old Frank Garmback, were responding to a police dispatch call regarding a male who had a gun. A caller reported that a male was pointing "a pistol" at random people at the Cudell Recreation Center, a park in the City of Cleveland's Public Works Department. At the beginning of the call and again in the middle, he says of the pistol "it's probably fake." Toward the end of the two-minute call the caller states that "he is probably a juvenile", but the dispatcher did not relay either of these statements to Loehmann and Garmback.
Christopher A. Seeger is an American lawyer who specializes in multidistrict mass tort and class action litigation. He received the most multidistrict litigation (MDL) appointments of any lawyer between 2016 and 2019 according to an 2020 ALM study. Seeger is a founding partner of the firm Seeger Weiss LLP.
A negotiation class is a newly proposed procedural device intended to encourage settlement when there are large numbers of plaintiffs with claims against the same defendants. It is a type of class action and, as such, requires judicial approval before it can be used.
Quisi Bryan is an American man convicted of murdering Cleveland police officer Wayne Leon during a traffic stop in 2000. Bryan is on death row in Ohio and is scheduled to be executed on January 7, 2026.
Nachawati Law Group is an American plaintiffs' law firm headquartered in Dallas. The law firm was founded in 2006 by Bryan Fears and Majed Nachawati. The firm rebranded in October 2022 following the departure of Bryan Fears, who formed Fears Law. The firm is active in mass tort and multidistrict litigation on behalf of individuals and public entities.
Walmart Inc. v. DEA-DOJ was a settlement involving the complaints and lawsuits of Walmart pharmacy, and other large pharmaceutical companies. The lawsuits were made after an official complaint issued by the United States Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration, after Walmart was accused of illegally selling opioids to their customers, despite prior laws prohibiting such actions.