Day-fine

Last updated

A day-fine , unit fine or structured fine is a pecuniary sanction which is based on the severity of the offence as well as the income (or wealth) of the offender. [1]

Contents

The fine amount is calculated by determining the number of days based on the severity of the violation—the more severe the violation, the greater the number of days imposed. The daily unit, which represents how much is paid per day, is a standardized portion of an individual's daily income, ensuring equal proportional impact across all offenders. The total fine is the product of the number of days and the daily unit. [2]

The rationale behind this type of fine is to create a fining system which equalises the burden of the punishment on the offenders, irrespective of their income. It has been introduced in different countries for a variety of reasons: to replace a short-term imprisonment sentence, to make the finding system more fair across different income groups, to enhance deterrence. [3]

The day fine system is practices already in around half of the European countries, and in some additional jurisdictions around the world. [4] Among those jurisdiction are Denmark (Danish : dagbøde), Estonia (Estonian : päevamäär), Finland (Finnish : päiväsakko), France (French : Jour-amende), Germany (German : Tagessatz), Portugal (Portuguese: Astreinte), Sweden (Swedish : dagsbot), Switzerland, and Macau (Chinese :刑法典).

Example countries

Germany [5]

Germany has imposed day fines since 1969. [6] Day fines are used for convictions under the criminal code (Geldstrafe), while administrative fines (Geldbuße), such as for minor traffic infractions, usually use fixed amounts.

Denmark [7]

Violations of the Danish Penal Code may be punishable by up to 60 day-fines, when the severity of a crime does not call for a custodial sentence. [8]

Fines issued under other laws (e.g. the traffic code) are not day-fines and do not ordinarily scale. Exceptions include fines for driving under the influence or without a valid license, which (although not technically day-fines) scale with income. Fines that do not scale may still be reduced by half (to a minimum of DKK 500) for offenders who are under 18 or whose gross annual income does not exceed DKK 171,795 (as of 2020). [9]

Finland [10]

Both police and the Finnish Border Guard can make a formal demand for fining a person or order a petty fine. Poliiseja ja rajavartijoita partioveneella.jpg
Both police and the Finnish Border Guard can make a formal demand for fining a person or order a petty fine.

In Finland, the day-fine system is used for most crimes that are punishable by way of a fine. The system has been in use since 1921. [11] [12] Most minor infractions are punished with a fixed petty fine (rikesakko, ordningsbot) such as minor traffic and water traffic violations, littering, and breaches of public peace. [13] A petty fine is summarily ordered by the police officer if the suspect does not contest his guilt, but the person punished may contest the fine in a district court. [14]

Finnish prosecutors have considerable judicial power in deciding fines. Here, prosecutors are arriving at a court of law. Valtionsyyttaja Ari Kuusimaki ja kihlakunnansyyttajat Johanna Hervonen seka Tommi Hietanen.jpg
Finnish prosecutors have considerable judicial power in deciding fines. Here, prosecutors are arriving at a court of law.

Most infractions are punishable with a day-fine. For crimes warranting no more than six months in prison, the fine may be summarily ordered by the prosecutor if the suspect does not want the court to handle the case. The process of ordering a day fine is started by a police officer who makes a formal demand for the suspect to be fined. The suspect has one week to contest the demand. If the suspect does not contest the demand, the prosecutor may order a fine which may not be higher than demanded by the police officer. If the suspect contests the demand, the case may be taken to the district court if the prosecutor considers the suspect guilty. If the prosecutor considers the case to merit a term in prison or a higher fine, the case is always taken to the court. [15] If the prosecution or the injured party do not demand a higher punishment than a fine, the district court has a quorum with a single member. [16] The fine is paid to the bank using a giro. [17] A fine ordered in Finland is executable in any European Union member country. [18]

A Finnish fine consists of a minimum of 1 day-fine, up to a maximum of 120 day-fines. If several crimes are punished together, 240 day-fines may be sentenced. The fines may not be sentenced together with a prison sentence, unless the prison sentence is probational. The minimum amount of a day-fine is 6 euros. Usually, the day-fine is one half of daily disposable income. The daily disposable income is considered to be one 60th part of the person's monthly mean income during the year, after taxes, social security payments and a basic living allowance of €255 per month have been deducted. In addition, every person for whose upkeep the fined person is responsible decreases the amount of daily fine by €3. The income of the person is calculated on the basis of the latest taxation data. [19] [20] For speeding in traffic, however, the fine is at least as high as the petty fine, i.e. €115. [21]

The person who is punished with a fine is responsible for giving accurate information concerning their income. Lying about one's income (Finnish : sakkovilppi, Swedish : bötesfusk) is a crime punishable with a fine or up to three months in prison. [22] The police can, however, access the taxation data of Finnish citizens and permanent residents via a real-time datalink, so the chance of lying successfully is minor. There is no maximum day-fine, which may lead to considerably high fines for high-income persons. For example, in 2001, a Finnish businessman with a yearly income of 10 million euros, received a relatively mild punishment of six day-fines, amounting €26,000, for driving though a red traffic light. [23] [24] In 2009 a businessman was fined €112,000 for travelling at 82 kilometres per hour in an area with a speed limit of 60 kilometres per hour. [25] In 2019, Maarit Toivanen, a business executive, was fined €74,000 for driving at 112 kilometres per hour (70 mph) in a 80 kilometres per hour (50 mph) speed limit area. [26] As speeding is punished with a petty fine if the offender is exceeding the speed limit by up to 20 km/h, but with a day-fine if exceeding the limit by 21 km/h or more, the monetary amount of the fine can increase from €115 to over €100,000 although the actual change in speed is less than 1 km/h. This has given rise to some criticism, most vividly expressed by a Finnish member of parliament, avid motorist Klaus Bremer and other MPs of right-wing parties. [27]

The fines are subject to recovery proceedings. If the fines are still not paid, the court may convert them to a prison sentence. Three day-fines will be converted to one day of imprisonment, ignoring the remainder for any amount of day-fines not divisible by three, and the length of the sentence must be between 4 and 60 days. This "conversion punishment" (Finnish : muuntorangaistus, Swedish : förvandlingsstraff) is only ever applied to court-ordered fines, not those issued by police.

Macau

Article 45 of the Penal Code (Chinese :刑法典, Portuguese: Código Penal) specifies that a criminal fine (Chinese :罰金, Portuguese: pena de multa) shall normally be at least 10 days and at most 360 days. One day-fine costs at least 50 Macanese patacas and at most 10,000 patacas. A court of law imposes the fine based on the economic and financial situations and personal burdens of a convict. [28]

Sweden [29]

In Sweden, fines can be set both as an absolute amount or as day fines. Day fines were introduced in 1931.

Switzerland [30]

Since 2007 Switzerland has day-fines, which were introduced mostly to replace short prison sentences. [31]

United Kingdom [32]

England and Wales experimented with the system for a short period from 1992 to 1993. It was unpopular with both magistrates and the general public, and was soon abandoned. [33] [34] The scheme was replaced by requirements that magistrates consider an offender's means when imposing a fine, just not according to a mathematical formula. [34]

United States

The New York Times reported on an experiment with day fines which took place in 1988 in Staten Island, which was a partnership between the local courts and District Attorney, and the Vera Institute of Justice. [35] In addition to Staten Island, day fines experiments have also been piloted in Maricopa County, Arizona; Bridgeport, Connecticut; Polk County, Iowa; four counties in Oregon; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. [36] An additional project was set up for Ventura County, California, but never ultimately implemented. [36] According to the National Center for Access to Justice, Oklahoma is the only state in the U.S. that "has taken one or more specific steps to mandate, encourage or facilitate courts’ use of individualized fines (“day fines”) that are scaled according to both the severity of the offense and the individual’s economic status." [37] [38]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice</span> Justice to those who have committed crimes

Criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who have been accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and the prisons system.

Military justice is the body of laws and procedures governing members of the armed forces. Many nation-states have separate and distinct bodies of law that govern the conduct of members of their armed forces. Some states use special judicial and other arrangements to enforce those laws, while others use civilian judicial systems. Legal issues unique to military justice include the preservation of good order and discipline, the legality of orders, and appropriate conduct for members of the military. Some states enable their military justice systems to deal with civil offenses committed by their armed forces in some circumstances.

Probation in criminal law is a period of supervision over an offender, ordered by the court often in lieu of incarceration. In some jurisdictions, the term probation applies only to community sentences, such as suspended sentences. In others, probation also includes supervision of those conditionally released from prison on parole. An offender on probation is ordered to follow certain conditions set forth by the court, often under the supervision of a probation officer. During the period of probation, an offender faces the threat of being incarcerated if found breaking the rules set by the court or probation officer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal record</span> Record of a persons criminal history

A criminal record is a record of a person's criminal convictions history. The information included in a criminal record, and the existence of a criminal record, varies between countries and even between jurisdictions within a country. In most cases it lists all non-expunged criminal offences and may also include traffic offences such as speeding and drunk driving. In most countries, a criminal record is limited to unexpunged and unexpired actual convictions, while in some it can also include arrests, charges dismissed, charges pending and charges of which the individual has been acquitted. The term rap sheet refers to Record of Arrest and Prosecution, similar to a criminal record.

A suspended sentence is a sentence on conviction for a criminal offence, the serving of which the court orders to be deferred in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation. If the defendant does not break the law during that period and fulfills the particular conditions of the probation, the sentence is usually considered fulfilled. If the defendant commits another offence or breaks the terms of probation, the court can order the sentence to be served, in addition to any sentence for the new offence.

In criminal law, a sentence is the punishment for a crime ordered by a trial court after conviction in a criminal procedure, normally at the conclusion of a trial. A sentence may consist of imprisonment, a fine, or other sanctions. Sentences for multiple crimes may be a concurrent sentence, where sentences of imprisonment are all served together at the same time, or a consecutive sentence, in which the period of imprisonment is the sum of all sentences served one after the other. Additional sentences include intermediate, which allows an inmate to be free for about 8 hours a day for work purposes; determinate, which is fixed on a number of days, months, or years; and indeterminate or bifurcated, which mandates the minimum period be served in an institutional setting such as a prison followed by street time period of parole, supervised release or probation until the total sentence is completed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Finland</span> National court system of Finland

Under the Constitution of Finland, everyone is entitled to have their case heard by a court or an authority appropriately and without undue delay. This is achieved through the judicial system of Finland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Texas</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Texas for murder, and participation in a felony resulting in death if committed by an individual who has attained or is over the age of 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deterrence (penology)</span> Use of punishment as a threat to deter people from offending

Deterrence in relation to criminal offending is the idea or theory that the threat of punishment will deter people from committing crime and reduce the probability and/or level of offending in society. It is one of five objectives that punishment is thought to achieve; the other four objectives are denunciation, incapacitation, retribution and rehabilitation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in New Zealand</span>

Crime in New Zealand encompasses criminal law, crime statistics, the nature and characteristics of crime, sentencing, punishment, and public perceptions of crime. New Zealand criminal law has its origins in English criminal law, which was codified into statute by the New Zealand parliament in 1893. Although New Zealand remains a common law jurisdiction, all criminal offences and their penalties are codified in New Zealand statutes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice system of the Netherlands</span> Overview of criminal justice system in the Netherlands

The criminal justice system of the Netherlands is the system of practices and institutions of the Netherlands directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crime, and sanctioning those who violate laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. The Netherlands' criminal code is based on the Napoleonic Code, imposed during the time of the French Empire. The Dutch largely kept the Napoleonic Code after their independence, but tempered it with a significantly more rehabilitative penological focus.

In Finland, murder is defined as homicide with at least one of four aggravating factors:

  1. Intent
  2. Brutality or cruelty
  3. Endangering public safety
  4. Killing a public servant upholding public safety or because of his lawful duty.
<i>R v Gladue</i> 1995 Supreme Court of Canada case on sentences for Indigenous offenders

R v Gladue is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the sentencing principles that are outlined under s. 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code. That provision, enacted by Parliament in 1995, directs the courts to take into consideration "all available sanctions, other than imprisonment" for all offenders. It adds that the courts are to pay "particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders".

Sentencing in England and Wales refers to a bench of magistrates or district judge in a magistrate's court or a judge in the Crown Court passing sentence on a person found guilty of a criminal offence. In deciding the sentence, the court will take into account a number of factors: the type of offence and how serious it is, the timing of any plea of guilty, the defendant's character and antecedents, including their criminal record and the defendant's personal circumstances such as their financial circumstances in the case of a fine being imposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) is a statute of the Parliament of the United Kingdom enacted by the coalition government of 2010-2015, creating reforms to the justice system. The bill for the act was introduced in the House of Commons on 21 June 2011, and received Royal Assent on 1 May 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in Finland</span>

Crime in Finland is combated by the Finnish police and other agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice reform in the United States</span> Reforms seeking to address structural issues in criminal justice systems of the United States

Criminal justice reform seeks to address structural issues in criminal justice systems such as racial profiling, police brutality, overcriminalization, mass incarceration, and recidivism. Reforms can take place at any point where the criminal justice system intervenes in citizens’ lives, including lawmaking, policing, sentencing and incarceration. Criminal justice reform can also address the collateral consequences of conviction, including disenfranchisement or lack of access to housing or employment, that may restrict the rights of individuals with criminal records.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incarceration in Norway</span> Overview of incarceration in Norway

Norway's criminal justice system focuses on the principles of restorative justice and the rehabilitation of prisoners. Correctional facilities in Norway focus on maintaining custody of the offender and attempting to make them functioning members of society. Norway's prison system is renowned as one of the most effective and humane in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States</span> Costs paid by convicted people incurred by their prosecution and incarceration

In the United States, criminal justice financial obligations (CJFOs), alternatively monetary sanctions or legal financial obligations, refers to costs paid by individuals as a result of their involvement in the criminal justice system. CJFOs consist of fines, property forfeiture, costs, fees, and victim restitution, and may also include payment for child support. They have their roots in European laws going back to the Middle Ages, and although they fell out of favor in the US in the early 19th century, regained popularity in the mid to late 20th century, to become the most common form of punishment used by the criminal justice system across the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">French criminal law</span>

French criminal law is "the set of legal rules that govern the State's response to offenses and offenders". It is one of the branches of the juridical system of the French Republic. The field of criminal law is defined as a sector of French law, and is a combination of public and private law, insofar as it punishes private behavior on behalf of society as a whole. Its function is to define, categorize, prevent, and punish criminal offenses committed by a person, whether a natural person or a legal person. In this sense it is of a punitive nature, as opposed to civil law in France, which settles disputes between individuals, or administrative law which deals with issues between individuals and government.

References

  1. ↑ Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena (2015-11-01). "Day-Fines: Should the Rich Pay More?". Review of Law & Economics. 11 (3): 481–501. doi:10.1515/rle-2014-0045. ISSN   1555-5879.
  2. ↑ Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena (2015-11-01). "Day-Fines: Should the Rich Pay More?". Review of Law & Economics. 11 (3): 481–501. doi:10.1515/rle-2014-0045. ISSN   1555-5879.
  3. ↑ Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Comparative Law and Economics Perspective on Day Fines", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 366–388, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  4. ↑ Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael, eds. (2021). Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2.
  5. ↑ Albrecht, Hans-Joerg (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day Fines in Germany", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–121, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  6. ↑ Nagrecha, Mitali (June 2020). "The Limits of Fairer Fines: Lessons from Germany" (PDF). Fair Trials. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 18, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2021.
  7. ↑ Elholm, Thomas (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day Fines in Denmark", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–84, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  8. ↑ "Bekendtgørelse af straffeloven" [Proclamation of the penal code] (in Danish). Ministry of Justice. September 17, 2019. § 51, 1.
  9. ↑ "Om bøder: Hvornår kan jeg få nedsættelse?" [About fines: How may I be eligible for a reduction?] (in Danish). Politiet. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020.
  10. ↑ Lahti, Raimo (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day Fines in Finland", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–43, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  11. ↑ Law 130/1921
  12. ↑ Suzanne Daley (April 25, 2015). "Speeding in Finland Can Cost a Fortune, if You Already Have One". The New York Times . Retrieved 2015-04-26. In fact, the Finnish "day fine" system, also in use in some other Scandinavian countries, dates to the 1920s, when fines based on income were instituted for all manner of lesser crimes, such as petty theft and assault, and helped greatly reduce the prison population.
  13. ↑ Criminal Code (Rikoslaki 39/1889) Chapter 2a, 9 §] Retrieved 9-27-2007 (in Finnish)
  14. ↑ Laki rikesakkomenettelystä, 6§ and 12 §. Retrieved 9-27-2007 (in Finnish)
  15. ↑ Laki rangaistusmääräysmenettelystä (692/1992) Retrieved 9-27-2007 (in Finnish)
  16. ↑ Oikeudenkäymiskaari (4/1734), Chapter 2, 6 §. Retrieved 9-27-2007. (in Finnish)
  17. ↑ Oikeusrekisterikeskus. Täytäntöönpano- ja perintäasiat. Retrieved 9-27-2007. (in Finnish)
  18. ↑ Oikeusrekisterikeskus. EU-sakkojen täytäntöönpano. Retrieved 9-27-2007. (in Finnish)
  19. ↑ Rikoslaki (39/1889), Chapter 2a. Retrieved 27-9-2007 (in Finnish)
  20. ↑ Asetus päiväsakon rahamäärästä, 2-3§. Retrieved 27-9-2007. (in Finnish)
  21. ↑ Asetus päiväsakon rahamäärästä, 7§. Retrieved 27-9-2007. (in Finnish)
  22. ↑ Rikoslaki (39/1889), Chapter 16, 6 §. Retrieved 9-27-2007. (in Finnish)
  23. ↑ Nokian Ala-Pietilän 208000 markan sakot voivat vielä nousta Iltasanomat 11-9-2001. Retrieved 9-27-2001. (in Finnish)
  24. ↑ Nokian toimitusjohtaja sai jättisakot. Iltasanomat 9-13-2007. Retrieved 9-27-2001. (in Finnish)
  25. ↑ Businessman fined nearly EUR 112,000 for speeding in Eastern Finland Helsingin Sanomat 6.3.2009. Retrieved 6.3.2009. (in English)
  26. ↑ "Portugaliin veroja paennut vuorineuvos Maarit Toivanen kaahasi 74 000 euron sakot: "Ylinopeus tietysti harmittaa"" (in Finnish). Iltalehti. 30 July 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2021.
  27. ↑ Täysistunnon pöytäkirja PTK 73/2000 vp (The minutes of the plenary session of Finnish parliament, PTK 73/2000 vp.) Retrieved 9-27-2007. (in Finnish) Archived June 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  28. ↑ Penal Code of Macao in traditional Chinese and Portuguese Archived 2008-04-09 at the Wayback Machine . Retrieved 2008-05-28.
  29. ↑ Öberg, Jacob (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day Fines in Sweden", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–69, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  30. ↑ Killias, Martin; Biberstein, Lorenz (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day Fines in Switzerland", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 306–323, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  31. ↑ Killias, Martin; Biberstein, Lorenz (2021). "Day fines in Switzerland". Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems. Cambridge University Press: 306–323. doi:10.21256/zhaw-22713.
  32. ↑ Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Mouzakiti, Foivi Sofia (2021), Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena; Faure, Michael (eds.), "Day (Unit) Fines in England and Wales", Day Fines in Europe: Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–215, ISBN   978-1-108-49083-2 , retrieved 2025-01-10
  33. ↑ Summary Justice Review Committee
  34. 1 2 "Fine plans echo 1991 Tory policy". BBC . London. January 14, 2015. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
  35. ↑ "Criminal Fines, by the Day". The New York Times. New York. August 29, 1988. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
  36. 1 2 Colgan, Beth A. (2017). "Graduating Economic Sanctions According to Ability to Pay". Iowa Law Review. 53.
  37. ↑ "Fines and Fees". National Center for Access to Justice. Archived from the original on 2021-05-20. Retrieved October 19, 2021.
  38. ↑ "2014 Oklahoma Statutes Title 22. Criminal Procedure §22-991a. Sentencing powers of court - Alcohol and drug assessment and evaluation - Restitution, fines, or incarceration - Victim impact statements - Probation and monitoring - DNA samples". Justia US Law. Archived from the original on 2021-10-19. Retrieved October 19, 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.