Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al

Last updated
Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al
US DC NorCal.svg
Court United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Decideddismissed on 31 January 2024
Docket nos.4:23-cv-05829-JSW [1]
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Jeffrey White

Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al is a lawsuit by Defence for Children International-Palestine et al in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against President Joe Biden, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken for the U.S. officials; alleged "failure to prevent and complicity in the unfolding genocide against Gaza." [1] [2] [3] [4] The plaintiffs include several Palestinian Americans whose families have been killed. [5] The court dismissed the case on January 31, 2024, ruling that while "it is plausible that Israel's conduct amounts to genocide," US foreign policy was a political question over which courts lacked jurisdiction. [6] [7] [8]

Contents

Background

The Israel–Hamas war had seen high levels of civilian deaths in Gaza, mostly due to the israeli invasion of Gaza with Oxfam stating that the "death rate in Gaza is higher than any other major 21st Century conflict." [9] The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, citing the Gaza Health Ministry, reported that by day 97 of the war that 23,708 were killed, with 60,005 injuries and over 1.9 million people displaced in Gaza. [10]

The plaintiffs' families have been severely affected by hostilities in Gaza. Together, the plaintiffs counted over 100 family members killed in Gaza. [5] Included among the dead are six members of Ahmed Abu Artema's family who were killed, including his 12-year-old son, five members of Dr. Al-Najjar's extended family who were killed, and eight of Mr. Abu Rokbeh's family who were killed. [5] Several individuals and 77 human rights organizations have stood behind the plaintiffs as amici curiae, including Josh Paul from the US State Department; genocide and Holocaust scholars William Schabas, Dr. John Cox, Dr. Victoria Sanford, Dr. Barry Trachtenberg; and Jewish Voice for Peace. [11] [12] [13]

Case timeline

The Center for Constitutional Rights filed the case for the plaintiffs on November 13th, 2023. The preliminary injunction hearing took place on January 26, 2024. [5]

Outcome

On 31 January 2024, the case was dismissed. The judge ruled that the court lacked jurisdiction over US foreign policy due to the U.S. Constitution's political question doctrine, but that he would have preferred to have issued the injunction and urged President Biden to rethink U.S. policy, [6] [7] writing: [8] : 8 

There are rare cases in which the preferred outcome is inaccessible to the Court. This is one of those cases. The Court is bound by precedent and the division of our coordinate branches of government to abstain from exercising jurisdiction in this matter. Yet, as the ICJ has found, it is plausible that Israel's conduct amounts to genocide. This Court implores Defendants to examine the results of their unflagging support of the military siege against the Palestinians in Gaza.

The often cited precedent against jurisdiction of U.S. courts in this case was Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc (2007). [14] [15]

As reason to not apply the U.S. statutes in regard to the Genocide Convention on the actions of the U.S. government, the court relied on the political question doctrine and cited the reasoning in Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc: "Whether to grant military or other aid to a foreign nation is a political decision inherently entangled with the conduct of foreign relations." [8] : 7 

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hamas</span> Palestinian political and military organization

Hamas, an acronym of its official name, Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya, is a Palestinian Sunni Islamist political and military movement governing parts of the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palestinian Authority</span> Interim government in Western Asia

The Palestinian National Authority, commonly known as the Palestinian Authority and officially the State of Palestine, is the Fatah-controlled government body that exercises partial civil control over West Bank areas "A" and "B" as a consequence of the 1993–1995 Oslo Accords. The Palestinian Authority controlled the Gaza Strip prior to the Palestinian elections of 2006 and the subsequent Gaza conflict between the Fatah and Hamas parties, when it lost control to Hamas; the PA continues to claim the Gaza Strip, although Hamas exercises de facto control. Since January 2013, the Palestinian Authority has used the name "State of Palestine" on official documents, although the United Nations continues to recognize the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) as the "representative of the Palestinian people".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Israeli–Palestinian conflict</span> Ongoing military and political conflict in the Levant

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict is an ongoing military and political conflict about land and self-determination within the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine. Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, borders, security, water rights, the permit regime, Palestinian freedom of movement, and the Palestinian right of return.

Universal jurisdiction is a legal principle that allows states or international organizations to claim criminal jurisdiction over an accused person regardless of where the alleged crime was committed, and regardless of the accused's nationality, country of residence, or any other relation to the prosecuting entity. Crimes prosecuted under universal jurisdiction are considered crimes against all, too serious to tolerate jurisdictional arbitrage. The concept of universal jurisdiction is therefore closely linked to the idea that some international norms are erga omnes, or owed to the entire world community, as well as to the concept of jus cogens – that certain international law obligations are binding on all states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rachel Corrie</span> American activist and diarist (1979–2003)

Rachel Aliene Corrie was an American nonviolence activist and diarist. She was a member of the pro-Palestinian International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and was active throughout the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. In 2003, Corrie was in Rafah, a city in the Gaza Strip, where the Israeli military was demolishing Palestinian houses at the height of the Second Intifada. While protesting the demolitions as they were being carried out, she was killed by an Israeli armored bulldozer that had crushed her.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IDF Caterpillar D9</span> Armored bulldozer used by the Israel Defense Forces

The IDF Caterpillar D9 — nicknamed Doobi — is a Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozer used by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). It is supplied by Caterpillar Inc. and modified by the Israel Defense Forces, Israeli Military Industries and Israel Aerospace Industries to increase the survivability of the bulldozer in hostile environments and enable it to withstand attack.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shurat HaDin</span> Tel Aviv-based Israeli legal advocacy group

Shurat HaDin is an Israeli non-governmental organization (NGO) founded in Tel Aviv in 2003. Shurat HaDin has been described by some as a civil rights organization and others as a pro-Israel lawfare-waging NGO.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nitsana Darshan-Leitner</span> Israeli activist and lawyer

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner is an Israeli attorney, human rights activist, and the founder of Shurat HaDin – Israeli Law Center. As the president of the Shurat HaDin, she has represented hundreds of terror victims in legal actions against terror organizations and their supporters. Darshan-Leitner initiated a legal campaign to deprive terrorists of social media resources such as Facebook and Twitter. Darshan-Leitner assisted in blocking the Gaza Freedom Flotilla.

Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization was a civil case considered by US federal courts, against the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority. The plaintiffs were US citizens injured in terrorist attacks in Israel and US citizens who are relatives of those who were killed by these attacks. They sued Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority under the Antiterrorism Act of 1991, demanding $1 billion or more in damages. On 31 August 2016, the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that US federal courts lacked overseas jurisdiction on civil cases, and the 2nd Circuit decision was effectively upheld on appeal when the Supreme Court of the United States refused to hear an appeal of the Sokolow decision, sending the case back to the trial court for dismissal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidential Memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals (2017)</span>

The Presidential Memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals, officially the Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, is the 27th presidential memorandum signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on August 25, 2017. The intent was to prevent transgender people from serving in the U.S. military, on the basis that they would be a financial burden due to sex reassignment procedures and associated costs. Federal courts delayed the implementation of this rule by issuing four injunctions. On January 22, 2019, however, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration's ban to take effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine</span> International legal proceedings

The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Fatou Bensouda, on 20 December 2019 announced an investigation into war crimes allegedly committed in Palestine by members of the Israeli military or Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups since 13 June 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war</span>

Following the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel and outbreak of the Israel–Hamas war, the United States began to send warships and military aircraft into the Eastern Mediterranean and began sending Israel more military supplies. The Joe Biden administration stated that Israel would receive "whatever it needs" to support its offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

The year 2023 in Israel was defined first by wide-scale protests against a proposed judicial reform, and then by the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, which led to a war and to Israel invading the Gaza Strip.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Israeli war crimes</span> War crimes perpetrated by the State of Israel and the Israel Defense Forces

Israeli war crimes are the violations of international criminal law, including war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of genocide, which the Israel Defense Forces, the military branch of the state of Israel, has been accused of committing since the founding of Israel in 1948. These have included murder, intentional targeting of civilians, killing prisoners of war and surrendered combatants, indiscriminate attacks, collective punishment, starvation, the use of human shields, sexual violence and rape, torture, pillage, forced transfer, breach of medical neutrality, targeting journalists, attacking civilian and protected objects, wanton destruction, incitement to genocide, and genocide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palestinian genocide accusation</span> Allegations pertaining to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

The State of Israel has been accused of carrying out or inciting genocide against Palestinians during the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. This accusation has been linked to the conceptualization of Israel as a settler colonial state. Those who believe Israel's actions constitute genocide typically point to the phenomena of anti-Palestinianism, Islamophobia, anti-Arab racism in Israeli society, and they cite the Nakba, the Sabra and Shatila massacre, the blockade of the Gaza Strip, the 2014 Gaza War and the 2023 Israel–Hamas war as instances of genocide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War crimes in the Israel–Hamas war</span> Violations of the laws of war during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war

Since the start of the Israel–Hamas war on 7 October 2023, the UN Human Rights Council has identified "clear evidence" of war crimes by both Hamas and the Israel Defense Forces. A UN Commission to the Israel–Palestine conflict stated that there is "clear evidence that war crimes may have been committed in the latest explosion of violence in Israel and Gaza, and all those who have violated international law and targeted civilians must be held accountable." On 27 October, a spokesperson for the OHCHR called for an independent court to review potential war crimes committed by both sides.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Israel–Hamas war protests in the United States</span> Protests relating to the Israel–Hamas war

Protests, including rallies, demonstrations, campaigns, and vigils, relating to the Israel–Hamas war have occurred nationwide across the United States since the conflict's start on 7 October 2023, occurring as part of a broader phenomenon of the Israel–Hamas war protests around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza</span> Alleged genocide of Palestinians by Israel

The State of Israel has been accused of genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip during the Israel–Hamas war. Various scholars, and the United Nations Special Rapporteurs Francesca Albanese, have cited statements by senior Israeli officials that they argue demonstrate an "intent to destroy" the population of Gaza, a necessary condition for the legal threshold of genocide to be met.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South Africa's genocide case against Israel</span> 2023-2024 case at the International Court of Justice

South Africa's genocide case against Israel was brought before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 29 December 2023 by South Africa regarding Israel's conduct in the Gaza Strip as part of the Israel–Hamas war. The case is officially known as Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accusations of United States complicity in Israeli war crimes in the Israel–Hamas war</span>

Israel has been accused of committing genocide in the Gaza war and the Biden administration has been accused of complicity in the genocide. The complicity accusation has been made in court, by federal staffers, human rights organizations and academic figures around the world.

References

  1. 1 2 "Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al". Justia Dockets & Filings. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  2. ↑ "Center for Constitutional Rights' (CCR) complaint" (PDF). CCRjustice.org. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  3. ↑ McGreal, Chris (13 November 2023). "US rights group sues Biden for alleged 'failure to prevent genocide' in Gaza". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  4. ↑ "US rights group sues Biden for alleged 'failure to prevent genocide' in Gaza". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Defense for Children International - Palestine v. Biden". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  6. 1 2 Hubler, Shawn (February 1, 2024). "A federal judge dismisses a suit to block U.S. support of Israel — but urges Biden to re-examine his approach". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2024-02-01.
  7. 1 2 Pazanowski, Bernie; Thomsen, Jacqueline (2024-02-01). "Israeli Military Aid Package Not Reviewable by Federal Court". Bloomberg Law . Retrieved 2024-02-02.
  8. 1 2 3 "Order Granting Motion to Dismiss and Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case 4:23-cv-05829-JSW, Document 91. 2024-01-31. pp. 1–9. Retrieved 2024-02-02– via Courthouse News Service.
  9. ↑ "Daily death rate in Gaza higher than any other major 21st Century conflict - Oxfam". Oxfam International. 11 January 2024. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  10. ↑ "United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - occupied Palestinian territory | Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel - reported impact | Day 97". United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - occupied Palestinian territory. 12 January 2024. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  11. ↑ "Brief of Amicus Curiae Jewish Voice for Peace" (PDF). CCRJ. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  12. ↑ "Josh Paul Declaration" (PDF). Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  13. ↑ "New Filings in Gaza Genocide Lawsuit: Palestinians Refute Biden Admin Arguments That Court Cannot Review Its Role in Furthering Israel's Genocide". Center for Constitutional Rights. Retrieved 14 January 2024.
  14. ↑ Corrie et al. v. Caterpillar
  15. ↑ CORRIE V CATERPILLAR, INC., No. 05-36210 (9th Cir. 2007)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.