William Schabas

Last updated

William Schabas

OC
ICTY Legacy Symposium Panel III - William Schabas (cropped).jpg
Born
William Anthony Schabas

(1950-11-19) 19 November 1950 (age 73)
Cleveland, Ohio, [1] U.S.
Education University of Toronto (BA, MA)
University of Montreal (LLB, LLM, LLD)

William Anthony Schabas, [2] OC (born 19 November 1950 [3] ) is a Canadian academic specialising in international criminal and human rights law. He is professor of international law at Middlesex University in the United Kingdom, professor of international human law and human rights at Leiden University in the Netherlands, and an internationally respected expert on human rights law, genocide and the death penalty.

Contents

Schabas also sits on the advisory board of the Israel Law Review , [4] the Journal of International Criminal Justice [5] and is editor-in-chief of Criminal Law Forum, the quarterly journal of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law. [6] He is a member of the board of trustees of the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights. Schabas served as one of seven commissioners on the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and as one of six commissioners on the Iran Tribunal Truth Commission from 18 to 22 June 2012.

In 2014, Schabas was appointed the head of a UN Committee investigating the role of Israel in the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict. The appointment was criticized by Canada's Foreign Minister, John Baird, and the Geneva-based advocacy NGO UN Watch, on the basis of allegations that Schabas was anti-Israel, a charge he denied. [7] [8] In February 2015 he resigned after an Israeli complaint [9] that he provided legal advice to the Palestine Liberation Organization in 2012. Schabas had been hired as a consultant to provide a legal analysis regarding the Palestinian bid for non-member observer status at the United Nations. [8] [10] Schabas stated that he was resigning to stop the controversy from overshadowing the work of the Gaza inquiry, whose results were due in March. [11] [12] Avigdor Lieberman hailed his resignation as an 'achievement for Israeli diplomacy'. [13]

In late 2019, Schabas defended the nation of Myanmar at the International Court of Justice in The Hague against charges of genocide towards its Rohingya population, brought by the republic of Gambia. [14]

Early life and education

Schabas was born in Cleveland, Ohio to an Ashkenazi Jewish family His family name, which is a variation of the Yiddish word for "Sabbath" ("Shabbos" ['ʃa.bɪs] in Yiddish, derived from "Shabbat" /ʃəˈbɑːt/ in Hebrew), which has been interpreted as perhaps suggesting also a Sephardic connection. [15] His mother, Ann (née Fairley), was born in Canada and served as dean of the Faculty of Library and Information Sciences at the University of Toronto. His father, Ezra Schabas, is an American-born Canadian musician and author. [15] [16] His maternal grandparents were Barker Fairley, an English-born painter and scholar, and Margaret Fairley, a writer and educator also born in England. His paternal grandparents came from Galicia, [15] and relatives on his father's side were murdered in the Holocaust. [9]

Schabas moved with his family to Toronto in 1952 and received his B.A. and M.A. degrees in history from the University of Toronto, and LL.B., LL.M. and LL.D. degrees from the Université de Montréal. He has also been awarded honorary doctorates by Dalhousie University, Halifax, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland and Northwestern University, Chicago.

According to UN Watch, when Schabas was a PhD student in history at the University of Toronto in 1974, and a leader in the SDS group, he was the subject of a university investigation for allegedly violating human rights and freedoms by physically obstructing a visiting Harvard professor from speaking on campus. Schabas was suspended from the university for four years, later reduced to two. [17] [18]

Career

From 1991 to 2000 he was a professor of human rights law and criminal law at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM), and he chaired the Department of Legal Studies from 1994 to 1998. He has taught as a visiting or adjunct professor at several other institutions, including McGill University, Queen's University Belfast, LUISS University in Rome, Cardoza Law School, Panthéon-Assas University and the National University of Rwanda.[ citation needed ]

Schabas moved to Ireland in 2000, serving as the director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway, until 2011. That year he moved to London to take up a chair in international law at Middlesex University, London. He is the recipient of the Vespasian V. Pellat Medal for International Criminal Justice of the Association international de droit penal and the gold medal in the Social Sciences of the Royal Irish Academy. Schabas was called to the Quebec bar in 1985 and practised law in Montreal for many years. He has also practised at the international level, appearing before the International Court of Justice, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court. Schabas was invited by the Special Court for Sierra Leone to serve as an amicus curiae .[ citation needed ]

He has written over 18 monographs and 200 articles. [19] In 2009 he was elected President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. [20] He is an Officer of the Order of Canada and a Member of the Royal Irish Academy, as well as holding a position on the board of directors of the International Institute for Criminal Investigation [21] and René Cassin, a non-government organisation that presents a Jewish voice on human rights. [22] Schabas has authored more than 350 academic journal articles. He has also delivered lectures or conference papers in more than fifty countries. His writings have been cited in judgments, decisions and opinions of: International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Special Court for Sierra Leone, European Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Supreme Court of Canada, United States Supreme Court, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, High Court of Tanzania and Supreme Court of Israel. [23]

Schabas has participated on several human rights fact-finding missions on behalf of international non-governmental organisations, such as Amnesty International and the International Federation of Human Rights, to such countries as Rwanda, Burundi, Sudan, South Africa and Russia. The 1993 mission to Rwanda, of which he was a member, alerted the international community to the danger of genocide in that country.[ citation needed ]

In 2011, Schabas attended a conference in Iran with the Tehran-based Non-Aligned Movement Center for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity where he was a keynote speaker. It was reported that the center has close ties with former Iranian president President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. [24] He attended the conference together with US film producer Sandra Schulberg in order to present a documentary film about the Nuremberg Trial to Iranians, which was welcomed by the audience, and spoke to them about the Holocaust and Nazi atrocities. [25] Schabas states that he went as an academic, and is opposed to academic boycotts of Israel and Iran. [26]

In December 2019, the Republic of The Gambia filed charges of genocide against Myanmar. Led by justice minister Abubacarr Tambadou and with the support of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, [27] the former international criminal lawyer alleged that a genocide against the Rohingya people took place in Myanmar between 2016 and 2017. William Schabas, who in 2010 had collaborated on a report detailing systematic attacks against the Rohingya and concluding that they met the international threshold of crimes against humanity, stood in defense of the Asian nation, leading to criticism. [14]

Overview

An interview with Schabas in the journal Intellectum [28] offers a concise overview of his opinions on Israeli operations in Gaza, the Goldstone Report, racism in Europe, the death penalty, genocide, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone, the International Criminal Court and its arrest warrant for President Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir of Sudan, and international criminal law in general.

Death penalty

Schabas has been very active in the movement for worldwide abolition of capital punishment. His book The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law [29] and his other writings on the subject have been referred to in judgments by national and international tribunals, including the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the United States Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of Canada and the Supreme Court of the Philippines. Schabas regularly lectures on capital punishment in China and the United States. In 2009 he was a consultant to the United Nations responsible for preparing the Secretary General's five-yearly report on the status of capital punishment. Schabas is the Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of the International Academic Network Against the Death Penalty and for a Universal Moratorium on Capital Punishment, and Advisor to the International Centre for Death Penalty Research at Beijing Normal University.

Genocide

For Schabas, the definition of what constituted the crime of genocide historically, unlike other laws governing international crimes, did not change for nearly 5 decades after its original formulation, though scholars beyond the legal discipline were critical of narrowness of the definition. Reviewing the evolving legal debate, Schabas notes a tendency to merge the notion of genocide with the related concept of crimes against humanity. In his own view, these should be kept distinct, with the former restricted to the definition originally framed in the Geneva Conventions, while the latter is sufficiently broad to prosecute all other cases of mass murder in ethnic and religious conflicts. [30]

Schabas argues that the legal term "genocide" is a loaded one that should not be used to describe every atrocity involving mass killings. He argues that, in the strict legal sense, the only true "genocides" in recent history were the Armenian genocide, the Jewish and Gypsy Holocaust, and the Rwandan genocide. In his book Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2009) he supports the view that Stalin's atrocities in the Ukraine, the killings of Slav and Soviet citizens under the Nazi occupation, and the Holodomor were not, legally, genocide. [31] In his book he summarizes the legal opinions regarding the status of the atrocities committed in Bosnia, deeming them ethnic cleansing and not genocide, stating that "Ethnic cleansing is also a warning sign of genocide to come. Genocide is the last resort of the frustrated ethnic cleanser." [32] Schabas also criticises the United Nations General Assembly for recognising ethnic cleansing as genocide.

In March 1993, Schabas co-authored the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Human Rights Violations in Rwanda. [22]

In a later book, War Crimes and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2008), Schabas states that the killings by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia during the late 1970s lacked "the ethnic dimension that is part of the essence of the crime [of genocide]." [33] Schabas took the same position in 2001 in his article "Cambodia: Was it Really Genocide?" [34] Further, while he strongly condemns the atrocities in Darfur in War Crimes and Human Rights, Schabas says that they should not be labelled genocide because "the summary execution" of non-Arabs in Darfur "does not establish genocidal intent." In War Crimes and Human Rights he also criticises the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia for finding a joint criminal enterprise to commit genocide in Srebrenica. [35]

From 10 to 12 December 2019, Schabas acted for the Myanmar government who were accused of committing genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing in The Hague. His appearance drew criticism from individuals and organizations involved in human rights protection. Phil Robertson, Deputy Asia Director at Human Rights Watch, stated: "William Schabas is basically selling out the Rohingya for some Myanmar gov’t $$$. Really the worst sort of behavior, how totally immoral and two-faced". [36] Stephen J Rapp, a former United States war crimes ambassador who works at the Holocaust museum, who contended saying it as, "We have heard this morning from my friend Bill Schabas, I was just with him 10 days ago. I prosecuted genocide, we obtained convictions for this crime. He is wrong about the law: this was a genocide." [36] Schabas stated: "Both sides have a right to have competent representation. If people don’t understand that, that’s not my problem." [36]

Middle East conflict

Statements

In 2011, the same year Schabas attended the Center for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity conference in Iran in Tehran, he said in a speech that he believes Israeli prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu should be "in the dock of an international court." He also wrote in a law journal article that the Israeli prime minister could be regarded as "the single individual most likely to threaten the survival of Israel." [26]

In 2012, in regard to the Iranian nuclear program, Schabas wrote that Iran "very arguably has a claim to require nuclear weapons for defensive purposes". [37] Regarding Hamas, Schabas said "If we look at the poor people of Gaza ... all they want is a state – and they get punished for insisting upon this, and for supporting a political party in their own determination and their own assessment that seems to be representing that aspiration." [37]

During his speech at the Russell Tribunal in 2013, Schabas said that it is his "profound belief, the international law can be used to demonstrate and underscore the violations committed by the state of Israel, and moreover can be used to hold accountable individuals who have perpetrated international crimes against the people of Palestine." Asked about various possible tools for prosecuting Israel, Schabas said: "I would have been inclined to talk about crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression, all of which I think can be shown have been perpetrated at various times during the history of the state of Israel. These are all crimes that have become increasingly robust in their definition in recent decades and for which we now have international institutions capable of prosecuting the crimes ... With a bit of luck and by twisting things and maneuvering we can get them before the courts" [38]

Schabas has accused Israel of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression committed "on the territory of Palestine since 2002", while acknowledging that "much of [his] effort" is focused on bringing about the prosecution of Israelis at the ICC. [37]

2014 UN Gaza inquiry

The United Nations Human Rights Council adopted a resolution on 23 July 2014 calling on establishment of a commission of inquiry to investigate all alleged violations of international humanitarian laws carried out by Israel during the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict. [39] Schabas was appointed the head of a three-member commission, together with Amal Clooney (Lebanon) who declined the nomination, [40] and Doudou Diène (Senegal). US judge McGowan Davis joined the committee as 3rd member.

Schabas's appointment was criticized by Canada's Foreign Minister, John Baird, and the Geneva-based advocacy NGO UN Watch. [8] They noted that Schabas, remarking on what he sees as the political bias in the choice of cases to prosecute made by the International Criminal Court, had asked: "Why are we going after the President of Sudan for Darfur and not the President of Israel for Gaza?" [19] [41] [42] Schabas dismissed Baird's accusation as absurd, noting that he, Schabas, was on the editorial board of the Israel Law Review . In reply to UN Watch's demand he recuse himself on the grounds that he had once criticized Benjamin Netanyahu, Schabas countered:'"Like everybody inside and outside Israel, I disagree with people. Is everyone in Israel who has an opinion about (Benjamin) Netanyahu anti-Israel?".' [8]

Schabas said at the time that there was some merit in comments by critics that Israel was being singled out by the UN for human rights violations, but added that double standards and bias in the UN works both ways, at times to Israel's advantage, citing the fact that the United States almost invariably vetoes resolutions critical of Israel in the Security Council. In short, he concluded:

Let's just say that it's a plausible complaint that maybe Israel has gotten a lot of attention at the Human Rights Council but at the same time it has perhaps had a lot of inattention at the Security Council, so the double standards work in both directions for Israel. [15]

The Israeli government condemned the appointment of Schabas, and Israel's Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said in an interview "Forming an investigatory committee headed by Schabas is like inviting ISIS to organize religious tolerance week at the UN." [43] Schabas replied that he does not hate Israel and that he will put his prior positions aside, adding: "Even if Spiderman was heading the probe, they [Israel] would've attacked him." [44]

In February 2015 Schabas resigned after an Israeli complaint [9] that he had billed the Palestine Liberation Organization for $US1,300 in 2012 for legal advice he gave them at their request, a precedent which might constitute evidence of a conflict of interest with his position as head of the investigative committee. [45] He stated that he did not want the controversy to overshadow the work of the Gaza inquiry. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the UNHRC to shelve its report: "After the resignation of the committee chairman, who was biased against Israel, the report must not be published". [12] [46] Avigdor Liberman attributed Schabas's resignation to Israel's diplomatic work, stating that: "appointing Schabas to investigate Israel was like appointing Cain to investigate Abel." [13] In reply, Schabas said the Prime Minister was entitled to spin the matter any way he liked, and that both he and Avigdor Liberman were "masters of extravagant and ridiculous statements." [13] According to Israeli commentator Gideon Levy, Schabas had fallen victim to investigative character assassination. [47]

In an interview with the BBC [48] Schabas admitted that "there is a distortion in the amount of attention given against Israel, and the number of resolutions directed against Israel" but defended the claim by saying Israel gets a "soft ride in the Security Council hearings." [49]

Publications

Schabas has written or edited twenty-one books dealing in whole or in part with international human rights law, including:

He has also published more than three hundred articles in academic journals, primarily in the fields of international human rights law and international criminal law. [50]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genocide</span> Intentional destruction of a people

Genocide is the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part.

Universal jurisdiction is a legal principle that allows states or international organizations to claim criminal jurisdiction over an accused person regardless of where the alleged crime was committed, and regardless of the accused's nationality, country of residence, or any other relation to the prosecuting entity. Crimes prosecuted under universal jurisdiction are considered crimes against all, too serious to tolerate jurisdictional arbitrage. The concept of universal jurisdiction is therefore closely linked to the idea that some international norms are erga omnes, or owed to the entire world community, as well as to the concept of jus cogens – that certain international law obligations are binding on all states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimes against humanity</span> Serious crimes committed as part of a large-scale attack against civilians

Crimes against humanity are certain serious crimes committed as part of a large-scale attack against civilians. Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during both peace and war and against a state's own nationals as well as foreign nationals. Together with war crimes, genocide, and the crime of aggression, crimes against humanity are one of the core crimes of international criminal law, and like other crimes against international law have no temporal or jurisdictional limitations on prosecution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rome Statute</span> 1998 international treaty establishing the International Criminal Court

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is the treaty that established the International Criminal Court (ICC). It was adopted at a diplomatic conference in Rome, Italy on 17 July 1998 and it entered into force on 1 July 2002. As of February 2024, 124 states are party to the statute. Among other things, it establishes court function, jurisdiction and structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda</span> 1994 court of the United Nations Security Council

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was an international court established in November 1994 by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 955 in order to adjudicate people charged for the Rwandan genocide and other serious violations of international law in Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, between 1 January and 31 December 1994. The court eventually convicted 61 individuals and acquitted 14.

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG), or the Genocide Convention, is an international treaty that criminalizes genocide and obligates state parties to pursue the enforcement of its prohibition. It was the first legal instrument to codify genocide as a crime, and the first human rights treaty unanimously adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, on 9 December 1948, during the third session of the United Nations General Assembly. The Convention entered into force on 12 January 1951 and has 152 state parties as of 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Goldstone</span> South African former judge

Richard Joseph Goldstone is a South African retired judge who served in the Constitutional Court of South Africa from July 1994 to October 2003. He joined the bench as a judge of the Supreme Court of South Africa, first in the Transvaal Provincial Division from 1980 to 1989 and then in the Appellate Division from 1990 to 1994. Before that, he was a commercial lawyer in Johannesburg, where he entered legal practice in 1963 and took silk in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International criminal law</span> Public international law

International criminal law (ICL) is a body of public international law designed to prohibit certain categories of conduct commonly viewed as serious atrocities and to make perpetrators of such conduct criminally accountable for their perpetration. The core crimes under international law are genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Dugard</span> South African professor

Christopher John Robert Dugard is a South African professor of international law. His main academic specializations are in Roman-Dutch law, public international law, jurisprudence, human rights, criminal procedure and international criminal law. He has served on the International Law Commission, the primary UN institution for the development of international law, and has been active in reporting on human-rights violations by Israel in the Palestinian territories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Navi Pillay</span> South African lawyer, judge and human rights activist

Navanethem "Navi" Pillay is a South African jurist who served as the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014. A South African of Indian Tamil origin, Pillay was the first non-white woman judge of the High Court of South Africa. She has also served as a judge of the International Criminal Court and President of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Her four-year term as High Commissioner for Human Rights began on 1 September 2008 and was extended an additional two years in 2012. In September 2014 Prince Zeid bin Ra'ad succeeded her in her position as High Commissioner for Human Rights. In April 2015, Pillay became the 16th Commissioner of the International Commission Against the Death Penalty. She is also one of the 25 leading figures on the Information and Democracy Commission launched by Reporters Without Borders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karim Ahmad Khan</span> British lawyer (born 1970)

Karim Asad Ahmad Khan is a British lawyer specialising in international criminal law and international human rights law, who has served as Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court since 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Scharf</span>

Michael P. Scharf is co-dean, Joseph C. Hostetler – BakerHostetler professor of law, and the director of the Frederick K. Cox International Law Center at Case Western Reserve University School of Law. Scharf is also co-founder of the Public International Law & Policy Group (PILPG), a non-governmental organization (NGO) which provides pro bono legal assistance to developing states and states in transition. Since 1995 PILPG has provided pro bono legal assistance to states and governments involved in peace negotiations, drafting post-conflict constitutions, and prosecuting war criminals. Since March 2012, Scharf has also been the producer and host of Talking Foreign Policy, a one-hour radio program aired on a quarterly basis on Cleveland’s NPR affiliate WCPN 90.3 ideastream.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict</span> Team formed in 2009 to investigate human rights violations by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza

The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, also known as the Goldstone Report, was a United Nations fact-finding mission established in April 2009 pursuant to Resolution A/HRC/RES/S-9/1 of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) of 12 January 2009, following the Gaza War as an independent international fact-finding mission "to investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, due to the current aggression". South African jurist Richard Goldstone was appointed to head the mission. The other co-authors of the Report were Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin and Desmond Travers.

An atrocity crime is a violation of international criminal law that falls under the historically three legally defined international crimes of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Ethnic cleansing is widely regarded as a fourth mass atrocity crime by legal scholars and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field, despite not yet being recognized as an independent crime under international law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 955</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 1994

United Nations Security Council resolution 955, adopted on 8 November 1994, after recalling all resolutions on Rwanda, the Council noted that serious violations of international humanitarian law had taken place in the country and, acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, established the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).

The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict was a United Nations fact-finding mission established by a resolution of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on 23 July 2014 to investigate "all violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law ... in the context of the military operations conducted since 13 June 2014" in the Palestinian territories, particularly the Gaza Strip, during the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict.

From July 8 to August 26, 2014, another conflict between Israel and Gaza escalated and led to the outbreak of a war between Israel and Gaza. Between 2,127 and 2,168 Gazans were killed, including 578 children. The Gaza Health Ministry reported more than 70% of the victims were civilians whilst Israel reported that 55% of the dead were civilians. On the Israeli side 66 soldiers and 5 Israeli civilians, including one child, were killed. These violent outbreaks led to various speeches regarding the Gaza Conflict in front of the United Nations, given by the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the President of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas and members of the Human Right Watch and Representatives of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incitement to genocide</span> Crime under international law

Incitement to genocide is a crime under international law which prohibits inciting (encouraging) the commission of genocide. An extreme form of hate speech, incitement to genocide is an inchoate offense and is theoretically subject to prosecution even if genocide does not occur, although charges have never been brought in an international court without mass violence having occurred. "Direct and public incitement to commit genocide" was forbidden by the Genocide Convention in 1948. Incitement to genocide is often cloaked in metaphor and euphemism and may take many forms beyond direct advocacy, including dehumanization and accusation in a mirror.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genocides in history</span> Overview of genocide in a historical context

Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. The term was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. It is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) of 1948 as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group's conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palestinian genocide accusation</span> Allegations pertaining to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

The State of Israel has been accused of carrying out or inciting genocide against Palestinians during the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. This accusation has been linked to the conceptualization of Israel as a settler colonial state. Those who believe Israel's actions constitute genocide typically point to the phenomena of anti-Palestinianism, Islamophobia, anti-Arab racism in Israeli society, and they cite the Nakba, the Sabra and Shatila massacre, the blockade of the Gaza Strip, the 2014 Gaza War and the 2023 Israel–Hamas war as instances of genocide.

References

  1. ↑ Schabas at Leiden University faculty site.
  2. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 October 2017. Retrieved 4 February 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ↑ Schabas, William (27 April 2009). "curriculum vitae: William Schabas" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  4. ↑ Israel Law Review, Editorial Board, Cambridge Journals
  5. ↑ Journal of International Criminal Justice, Oxford Journals
  6. ↑ Criminal Law Forum, Universiteit Leiden
  7. ↑ "UNHRC investigator Schabas Stays Mum on Hamas as "Terror Group"". The Jerusalem Post.
  8. 1 2 3 4 "William Schabas, Head of UN Gaza Commission, Dismisses Anti-Israel Charge". Cbc.ca. 11 August 2014. Under international law, William Schabas is obliged to recuse himself because his repeated calls to indict Israeli leaders obviously gives rise to actual bias or the appearance thereof
  9. 1 2 3 "Former Head of Inquiry Into Gaza War Says He Faced Pressure and Threats", by Marlise Simons, The New York Times, 11 FEB. 2015
  10. ↑ "The Fatal Flaws of the Schabas Inquiry". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 20 December 2014. Indeed, earlier this year, the UN Human Rights Council rejected his application for the post of special rapporteur for the Palestinian territories
  11. ↑ "Head of U.N. Inquiry into Gaza Conflict to Quit over Israeli Bias Claim". Reuters. 2 February 2015.
  12. 1 2 Herb Keinon (4 February 2015). "The indelible stain on the UN committee once chaired by William Schabas". The Jerusalem Post . Retrieved 6 February 2015. The man hailed by defenders as a world-class jurist didn't think that having been paid to provide a legal briefing for the PLO might constitute a conflict of interest preventing him from involvement in this commission. The defense he provided in his resignation letter seems almost adolescent: "I was not requested to provide any details on any of my past statements and other activities concerning Palestine and Israel." That he did not turn down the job even though he worked for one of the parties, and that the other party did not reveal that fact either, says much about the whole process.
  13. 1 2 3 Herb Keinon, "Schabas takes parting shot at 'masters of ridiculous statements' Netanyahu, Liberman ," Jerusalem Post , 3 February 2015.
  14. 1 2 "Canadian lawyer William Schabas defends role advocating for Myanmar government". cbc.ca. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Nathan Guttman, "8 Things You Didn't Know About The U.N. War Crimes Commission," Archived 3 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine The Forward 15 August 2015.
  16. ↑ Bartrop, Paul R.; Jacobs, Steven L. (March 2013). Fifty Key Thinkers on the Holocaust and Genocide. Routledge. ISBN   9781136931383.
  17. ↑ "When William Schabas was convicted in 1974, he tried to disqualify the judges for bias". UN Watch. 12 September 2014. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
  18. ↑ "CAUT Bulletin September 1974 (Volume 23, Number 1)". Canadian Association of University Teachers. 3 October 1974 – via Internet Archive.
  19. 1 2 "International Protection of Human Rights and Politics: An Inescapable Reality: Interview with Professor William Schabas" (PDF). Intellectum.org. Retrieved 20 December 2014.:'I believe that pretending the prosecution of Sudan is not political is a mistake too. Of course it is political. Why are we going after the president of Sudan for Darfur and not the president of Israel for Gaza? Because of politics.'
  20. ↑ Archived 5 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ↑ William Schabas, CV, Middlesex University
  22. 1 2 William Schabas, CV., Middlesex University
  23. ↑ William Schabas, CV Middlesex University
  24. ↑ "An Iranian 'human rights' wrong". NY Daily News.
  25. ↑ Non-aligned Movement Center for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity, ' Non-aligned Movement Center for Human Rights and Cultural Diversity Annual Report 2011,' Namiran February 2012
  26. 1 2 "William Schabas, head of UN Gaza commission, dismisses anti-Israel charge". Cbc.ca. 11 August 2014.
  27. ↑ "Aung San Suu Kyi, former democracy icon, defends Myanmar against genocide allegations". washingtonpost.com. 11 December 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  28. ↑ "Interview with Professor William Schabas_International Protection of Human Rights and Politics: an Inescapable Reality" (PDF). Intellectum.org. 2010. pp. 46–61. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  29. ↑ William Schabas,The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, Cambridge University Press (1993) 3RD.EDITION, 2003.
  30. ↑ William Schabas, "Genocide in International Law: A Discussion with William Schabas," Archived 13 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine United States Holocaust Memorial Museum 4 March 2004.
  31. ↑ Schabas, William (18 September 2000). Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   0-521-78790-4.
  32. ↑ Schabas, William (18 September 2000). Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes . Cambridge University Press. pp.  175–200, 201. ISBN   0-521-78790-4.
  33. ↑ Schabas, William (31 March 2008). War Crimes and Human Rights. Cameron May. p. 766. ISBN   978-1-905017-63-8.
  34. ↑ William Schabas, "Cambodia: Was It Really Genocide?", Human Rights Quarterly (2001).
  35. ↑ Schabas, William (31 March 2008). War Crimes and Human Rights. Cameron May. p. 751. ISBN   978-1-905017-63-8.
  36. 1 2 3 "Myanmar's lawyer to critics on genocide case: Everyone has right to defense". Reuters. 13 December 2019 – via www.reuters.com.
  37. 1 2 3 Irwin Cotler. "The fatal flaws of the Schabas Inquiry". The Jerusalem Post.
  38. ↑ "Schabas: 'Twist Things' to Get Israel in the Dock". Arutz Sheva. 13 August 2014.
  39. ↑ "21st Special Session of the Human Rights Council on the Human Rights Situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem – 23 July 2014". Ohchr.org. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  40. ↑ "UNHRC Investigator Schabas Stays Mum on Hamas as 'Terror Group'". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  41. ↑ Yitzhak Benhorin, 'Head of UN Gaza inquiry commission called to try Netanyahu at ICC,' Ynet 12 August 2014
  42. ↑ "NGO: William Schabas Must Recuse Himself from UN Gaza Inquiry". UN Watch. 11 August 2014. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  43. ↑ "Prosor: Having Schabas Lead UN Gaza Probe Akin to ISIS Hosting Religious Tolerance Event". The Jerusalem Post – JPost.com. Retrieved 20 December 2014.
  44. ↑ "'I Don't Hate Israel,' Head of UN Panel Probing Gaza Operation Says". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
  45. ↑ Yonah Jeremy Bob,"Schabas resignation may save Israelis at ICC," The Jerusalem Post , 4 February 2015.
  46. ↑ Newman, Marissa; Lazar Berman (3 February 2015). "As Gaza investigator quits, PM urges UN to shelve report". The Times of Israel . Retrieved 6 February 2015.
  47. ↑ Gideon Levy, "The ugly truth about Israel's actions in Gaza," Haaretz 5 February 2015: "One needs a great deal of chutzpah and arrogance to dig anew into the pasts of Israel's critics in an effort to assassinate their character, as in the case of Richard Goldstone, merely because they dared to criticize the state. As far as Israel is concerned, the fate of anyone who criticizes the country is sealed. He's an anti-Semite, anti-Israeli, greedy or driven by ulterior motives."
  48. ↑ "- YouTube". www.youtube.com.[ dead YouTube link ]
  49. ↑ "Schabas: There is a distortion in the attention given against Israel in the UNHRC". JPost. 9 July 2015.
  50. ↑ Schabas, supra note 1
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.