Digital curation

Last updated

Digital curation is the selection, [1] preservation, maintenance, collection, and archiving of digital assets. [2] [3] [4] [5] Digital curation establishes, maintains, and adds value to repositories of digital data for present and future use. [4] This is often accomplished by archivists, librarians, scientists, historians, and scholars. [6] Enterprises are starting to use digital curation to improve the quality of information and data within their operational and strategic processes. [7] Successful digital curation will mitigate digital obsolescence, keeping the information accessible to users indefinitely. [8] Digital curation includes digital asset management, data curation, digital preservation, and electronic records management. [9]

Contents

Word History

Much like the word archive has layered meanings and uses, the word curation is both a noun and a verb, used originally in the field of museology to represent a wide range of activities, most often associated with collection care, long-term preservation, and exhibition design. Curation can be a reference to physical repositories that store cultural heritage or natural resource collections (e.g., a curatorial repository) or a representation of varied policies and processes involved with the long-term care and management of heritage collections, digital archives, and research data (e.g, curatorial/collections management plans, curation life-cycle, and data curation). Yet curation is also associated with short-term objectives and processes of selection and interpretation for the purposes of presentation, such as for gallery exhibitions and websites, which contribute to knowledge creation. It has also been applied to interaction with social media including compiling digital images, web links, and movie files.

The term curation entered the legal framework through federal historic preservation laws, starting with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, [10] and was further defined and coded into federal regulations through 36 CFR Part 79: Curation of Federally-owned and Administered Archaeological Collections. [11] Curation has since permeated into an array of disciplines but remains closely tied to heritage and information management.

Core Principles and Activities

The term "digital curation" was first used in the e-science and biological science fields as a means of differentiating the additional suite of activities ordinarily employed by library and museum curators to add value to their collections and enable its reuse [12] [13] [14] from the smaller subtask of simply preserving the data, a significantly more concise archival task. [12] Additionally, the historical understanding of the term "curator" demands more than simple care of the collection. A curator is expected to command academic mastery of the subject matter as a requisite part of appraisal and selection of assets and any subsequent adding of value to the collection through application of metadata. [12]

Principles

There are five commonly accepted principles that govern the occupation of digital curation:

Methodology

The Digital Curation Center offers the following step-by-step life cycle procedures for putting the above principles into practice: [15]

Sequential Actions:

Occasional Actions:

The term "digital curation" is sometimes used interchangeably with terms such as "digital preservation" and "digital archiving." [2] [16] While digital preservation does focus a significant degree of energy on optimizing reusability, preservation remains a subtask to the concept of digital archiving, which is in turn a subtask of digital curation. [12] [14] For example, archiving is a part of curation, but so are subsequent tasks such as themed collection-building, which is not considered an archival task. Similarly, preservation is a part of archiving, as are the tasks of selection and appraisal that are not necessarily part of preservation. [14]

Data curation is another term that is often used interchangeably with digital curation, however common usage of the two terms differs. While "data" is a more all-encompassing term that can be used generally to indicate anything recorded in binary form, the term "data curation" is most common in scientific parlance and usually refers to accumulating and managing information relative to the process of research. [17] Data-driven research of education request the role of information professional gradually develop tradition of digital service to data curation particularly at the management of digital research data. [18] So, while documents and other discrete digital assets are technically a subset of the broader concept of data, [12] in the context of scientific vernacular digital curation represents a broader purview of responsibilities than data curation due to its interest in preserving and adding value to digital assets of any kind. [13]

Challenges

Rate of creation of new data and data sets

The ever lowering cost and increasing prevalence of entirely new categories of technology has led to a quickly growing flow of new data sets. [19] These come from well established sources such as business and government, but the trend is also driven by new styles of sensors becoming embedded in more areas of modern life. [13] This is particularly true of consumers, whose production of digital assets is no longer relegated strictly to work. Consumers now create wider ranges of digital assets, including videos, photos, location data, purchases, and fitness tracking data, just to name a few, and share them in wider ranges of social platforms. [13]

Additionally, the advance of technology has introduced new ways of working with data. Some examples of this are international partnerships that leverage astronomical data to create "virtual observatories," and similar partnerships have also leveraged data resulting from research at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN and the database of protein structures at the Protein Data Bank. [14]

Storage format evolution and obsolescence

By comparison, archiving of analog assets is notably passive in nature, often limited to simply ensuring a suitable storage environment. [2] Digital preservation requires a more proactive approach. [20] Today’s artifacts of cultural significance are notably transient in nature and prone to obsolescence when social trends or dependent technologies change. [13] This rapid progression of technology occasionally makes it necessary to migrate digital asset holdings from one file format to another in order to mitigate the dangers of hardware and software obsolescence which would render the asset unusable. [15] [8]

Underestimation of human labor costs

Modern tools for program planning often underestimate the amount of human labor costs required for adequate digital curation of large collections. As a result cost-benefit assessments often paint an inaccurate picture of both the amount of work involved and the true cost to the institution for both successful outcomes and failures. [13]

The concept of cost in business field would be more obvious. Varieties of business systems are running for daily operations. For example, human resources systems deal with recruitment and payroll, communication systems manage internal and external email, and administration systems handle finance, marketing, and other aspects. However, business systems in institutions are not designed for long-term information preservation initially. [21] In some instances, business systems are revised to become Digital Curation systems for preserving transaction information due to cost consideration. The example of business systems are Enterprise Content Management (ECM) applications, which are used by designated group people such as business executives, customers for information management that support key processes organizationally. In the long run, to transfer digital content from ECM applications to Digital Curation (DC) applications would be a trend in large organizations domestically or internationally. The improvement of maturity models of ECM and DC may add value to information that request cost deduction and extensive use for further modification. [21]

Standardization and coordination between institutions

An absence of coordination across different sectors of society and industry in areas such as the standardization of semantic and ontological definitions, [22] and in forming partnerships for proper stewardship of assets has resulted in a lack of interoperability between institutions, and a partial breakdown in digital curation practice from the standpoint of the ordinary user. [13] The example of coordination is Open Archival Information System (OAIS). [2]

OAIS Reference Model allows professionals and many other organizations and individuals to contribute efforts to the OAIS open forums for developing international standards of archival information in long-term access. [2] [23]

Digitization of analog materials

The curation of digital objects is not limited to strictly born-digital assets. Many institutions have engaged in monumental efforts to digitize analog holdings in an effort to increase access to their collections. [2] Examples of these materials are books, photographs, maps, audio recordings, and more. [13] The process of converting printed resources into digital collections has been epitomized to some degree by librarians and related specialists. For example, The Digital Curation Centre is claimed to be a "world leading centre of expertise in digital information curation" [24] that assists higher education research institutions in such conversions.

Material Types

Manuscripts

Built Cultural Heritage

Artifacts
Monuments or Architectural Assets

Nowadays, with the development in ICT and computer-based visualisation, curators benefit from the 3D Reconstruction methods and Digital Twin to not only represent their updated and authentic cultural heritage data sets but also assist conservation architects and the other experts in further practices on the assets. [25]

Intangible Cultural Heritage

Folklore

New representational formats

For some topics, knowledge is embodied in forms that have not been conducive to print, such as how choreography of dance or of the motion of skilled workers or artisans is difficult to encode. New digital approaches such as 3D holograms and other computer-programmed expressions are developing.[ citation needed ]

For mathematics, it seems possible for a new common language to be developed that would express mathematical ideas in ways that can be digitally stored, linked, and made accessible. The Global Digital Mathematics Library is a project to define and develop such a language. [26] [27]

Accessibility

The ability of the intended user community to access the repository’s holdings is of equal importance to all the preceding curatorial tasks. This must take into account not only the user community’s format and communication preferences, but also a consideration of communities that should not have access for various legal or privacy reasons. [28]

Access can be increased by providing information about open access status with open data and open source methods such as the OAI-PMH endpoints of an open archive, which are then aggregated by databases and search engines like BASE, CORE, and Unpaywall for academic papers. [29]

Responses to challenges

There are three elements for essential needs of institutions dealing with issues of digital curation: Leadership, Resources, and Collaboration. Three elements related to the role of advance-guards for librarians and archivists working with open approaches to technology, standardized process and scholarly communication. The archivist with leadership, who needs to be a dynamic and active role to embrace technology, standardized process, and scholarly communication. In addition, Archivist leader might adopt the business concept and methods to deal with their workflow such as raise funds, invest technology system, and comply with industry standards, in order to obtain more resources. Collaboration in archives and digital curation community could provide and share training, technologies, standards, and tools to help institutions on challengeable issues of digital curation. Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC), the Open Preservation Foundation or novel partnerships offer collaboration opportunity to institutions facing similar challenges in digital curation issues. [32]

Information field especially in libraries, archives, and museums significantly need to bring knowledge of new technologies. Traditional graduate school education is not enough to meet that demand; training program for current staffs in cultural repository would be an efficient supplement for that request, such as professional workshops, and MOOCs (Massively Open Online Courses) in data curation and management. [33]

International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC) is an established annual event since 2005, aiming to collaborate with individuals, organizations, and institutions facing challenges, supporting development, and exchanging ideas in the field. [36]

The International Journal of Digital Curation (IJDC) is administered by IJDC Editorial Board including the Editor-in-Chief, Digital Curation Center (DCC), and the following members. IJDC dedicate to provide scholarly platform for sharing, discussing, and improving knowledge and information of digital curation within the worldwide community. IJDC has two types of submission under editorial guidelines, which are peer-reviewed papers and general articles base on original research, the field information, and relevant events in digital curation. IJDC is published by the University of Edinburgh for the Digital Curation Centre in electronic form on a rolling basis two times a year. The open access to the public supports knowledge exchangeable in digital curation worldwide. [38]

Approaches

Many approaches to digital curation exist and have evolved over time in response to the changing technological landscape. Two examples of this are sheer curation [12] and channelization.[ citation needed ]

Sheer curation is an approach to digital curation where curation activities are quietly integrated into the normal work flow of those creating and managing data and other digital assets. The word sheer is used to emphasize the lightweight and virtually transparent nature of these curation activities. The term sheer curation was coined by Alistair Miles in the ImageStore project, [39] and the UK Digital Curation Centre's SCARP project. [40] The approach depends on curators having close contact or 'immersion' in data creators' working practices. An example is the case study of a neuroimaging research group by Whyte et al., which explored ways of building its digital curation capacity around the apprenticeship style of learning of neuroimaging researchers, through which they share access to datasets and re-use experimental procedures. [41]

Sheer curation depends on the hypothesis that good data and digital asset management at the point of creation and primary use is also good practice in preparation for sharing, publication and/or long-term preservation of these assets. Therefore, sheer curation attempts to identify and promote tools and good practices in local data and digital asset management in specific domains, where those tools and practices add immediate value to the creators and primary users of those assets. Curation can best be supported by identifying existing practices of sharing, stewardship, and re-use that add value, and augmenting them in ways that both have short-term benefits, and in the longer term reduce risks to digital assets or provide new opportunities to sustain their long-term accessibility and re-use value.[ citation needed ]

The aim of sheer curation is to establish a solid foundation for other curation activities which may not directly benefit the creators and primary users of digital assets, especially those required to ensure long-term preservation. By providing this foundation, further curation activities may be carried out by specialists at appropriate institutional and organisation levels, whilst causing the minimum of interference to others.[ citation needed ]

A similar idea is curation at source used in the context of Laboratory Information Management Systems LIMS. This refers more specifically to automatic recording of metadata or information about data at the point of capture and has been developed to apply semantic web techniques to integrate laboratory instrumentation and documentation systems. [42] Sheer curation and curation-at-source can be contrasted with post hoc digital preservation, where a project is initiated to preserve a collection of digital assets that have already been created and are beyond the period of their primary use.[ citation needed ]

Channelization is curation of digital assets on the web, often by brands and media companies, into continuous flows of content, turning the user experience from a lean-forward interactive medium, to a lean-back passive medium. The curation of content can be done by an independent third party, that selects media from any number of on-demand outlets from across the globe and adds them to a playlist to offer a digital "channel" dedicated to certain subjects, themes, or interests so that the end user would see and/or hear a continuous stream of content.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital obsolescence</span> Data loss as the format goes into disuse

Digital obsolescence is the risk of data loss because of inabilities to access digital assets, due to the hardware or software required for information retrieval being repeatedly replaced by newer devices and systems, resulting in increasingly incompatible formats. While the threat of an eventual "digital dark age" was initially met with little concern until the 1990s, modern digital preservation efforts in the information and archival fields have implemented protocols and strategies such as data migration and technical audits, while the salvage and emulation of antiquated hardware and software address digital obsolescence to limit the potential damage to long-term information access.

In library and archival science, digital preservation is a formal process to ensure that digital information of continuing value remains accessible and usable in the long term. It involves planning, resource allocation, and application of preservation methods and technologies, and combines policies, strategies and actions to ensure access to reformatted and "born-digital" content, regardless of the challenges of media failure and technological change. The goal of digital preservation is the accurate rendering of authenticated content over time.

An institutional repository (IR) is an archive for collecting, preserving, and disseminating digital copies of the intellectual output of an institution, particularly a research institution. Academics also utilize their IRs for archiving published works to increase their visibility and collaboration with other academics. However, most of these outputs produced by universities are not effectively accessed and shared by researchers and other stakeholders. As a result academics should be involved in the implementation and development of an IR project so that they can learn the benefits and purpose of building an IR.

A digital asset is anything that exists only in digital form and comes with a distinct usage right or distinct permission for use. Data that do not possess those rights are not considered assets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grey literature</span> Documents and research not produced for commercial or academic journal purposes

Grey literature is materials and research produced by organizations outside of the traditional commercial or academic publishing and distribution channels. Common grey literature publication types include reports, working papers, government documents, white papers and evaluations. Organizations that produce grey literature include government departments and agencies, civil society or non-governmental organizations, academic centres and departments, and private companies and consultants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fedora Commons</span>

Fedora is a digital asset management (DAM) content repository architecture upon which institutional repositories, digital archives, and digital library systems might be built. Fedora is the underlying architecture for a digital repository, and is not a complete management, indexing, discovery, and delivery application. It is a modular architecture built on the principle that interoperability and extensibility are best achieved by the integration of data, interfaces, and mechanisms as clearly defined modules.

The California Digital Library (CDL) was founded by the University of California in 1997. Under the leadership of then UC President Richard C. Atkinson, the CDL's original mission was to forge a better system for scholarly information management and improved support for teaching and research. In collaboration with the ten University of California Libraries and other partners, CDL assembled one of the world's largest digital research libraries. CDL facilitates the licensing of online materials and develops shared services used throughout the UC system. Building on the foundations of the Melvyl Catalog, CDL has developed one of the largest online library catalogs in the country and works in partnership with the UC campuses to bring the treasures of California's libraries, museums, and cultural heritage organizations to the world. CDL continues to explore how services such as digital curation, scholarly publishing, archiving and preservation support research throughout the information lifecycle.

The term Open Archival Information System refers to the ISO OAIS Reference Model for an OAIS. This reference model is defined by recommendation CCSDS 650.0-B-2 of the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems; this text is identical to = 57284 ISO 14721:2012. The CCSDS's purview is space agencies, but the OAIS model it developed has proved useful to other organizations and institutions with digital archiving needs. OAIS, known as ISO 14721:2003, is widely accepted and utilized by various organizations and disciplines, both national and international, and was designed to ensure preservation. The OAIS standard, published in 2005, is considered the optimum standard to create and maintain a digital repository over a long period of time.

The Digital Curation Centre (DCC) was established to help solve the extensive challenges of digital preservation and digital curation and to lead research, development, advice, and support services for higher education institutions in the United Kingdom.

Preservation metadata is item level information that describes the context and structure of a digital object. It provides background details pertaining to a digital object's provenance, authenticity, and environment. Preservation metadata, is a specific type of metadata that works to maintain a digital object's viability while ensuring continued access by providing contextual information, usage details, and rights.

Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification (TRAC) is a document describing the metrics of an OAIS-compliant digital repository that developed from work done by the OCLC/RLG Programs and National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) task force initiative.

PREservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies (PREMIS) is the de facto digital preservation metadata standard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital library</span> Online database of digital objects stored in electronic media formats and accessible via computers

A digital library is an online database of digital objects that can include text, still images, audio, video, digital documents, or other digital media formats or a library accessible through the internet. Objects can consist of digitized content like print or photographs, as well as originally produced digital content like word processor files or social media posts. In addition to storing content, digital libraries provide means for organizing, searching, and retrieving the content contained in the collection. Digital libraries can vary immensely in size and scope, and can be maintained by individuals or organizations. The digital content may be stored locally, or accessed remotely via computer networks. These information retrieval systems are able to exchange information with each other through interoperability and sustainability.

Data curation is the organization and integration of data collected from various sources. It involves annotation, publication and presentation of the data so that the value of the data is maintained over time, and the data remains available for reuse and preservation. Data curation includes "all the processes needed for principled and controlled data creation, maintenance, and management, together with the capacity to add value to data". In science, data curation may indicate the process of extraction of important information from scientific texts, such as research articles by experts, to be converted into an electronic format, such as an entry of a biological database.

An open repository or open-access repository is a digital platform that holds research output and provides free, immediate and permanent access to research results for anyone to use, download and distribute. To facilitate open access such repositories must be interoperable according to the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). Search engines harvest the content of open access repositories, constructing a database of worldwide, free of charge available research. Data repositories are the cornerstone for FAIR data practices and are used expeditiously within the scientific community.

Islandora is a free and open-source software digital repository system based on Drupal and integrating with additional applications, including Fedora Commons. It is open source software. Islandora was originally developed at the University of Prince Edward Island by the Robertson Library and is now maintained by the Islandora Foundation, which has a mission to, "promote collaboration through transparency and consensus building among Islandora community members, and to steward their shared vision for digital curation features through a body of software and knowledge."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collections management</span> Process of overseeing a collection, including acquisition, curation, and deaccessioning

Collections management involves the development, storage, and preservation of cultural property, as well as objects of contemporary culture in museums, libraries, archives and private collections. The primary goal of collections management is to meet the needs of the individual collector or collecting institution's mission statement, while also ensuring the long-term safety and sustainability of the cultural objects within the collector's care. Collections management, which consists primarily of the administrative responsibilities associated with collection development, is closely related to collections care, which is the physical preservation of cultural heritage. The professionals most influenced by collections management include collection managers, registrars, and archivists.

Data preservation is the act of conserving and maintaining both the safety and integrity of data. Preservation is done through formal activities that are governed by policies, regulations and strategies directed towards protecting and prolonging the existence and authenticity of data and its metadata. Data can be described as the elements or units in which knowledge and information is created, and metadata are the summarizing subsets of the elements of data; or the data about the data. The main goal of data preservation is to protect data from being lost or destroyed and to contribute to the reuse and progression of the data.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Repository of Ireland</span>

The Digital Repository of Ireland (DRI) is a digital repository for Ireland's humanities, social science and cultural heritage data. It was designed as an open access infrastructure that allows for interactive use and sustained growth. Three institutions, Royal Irish Academy (RIA), Trinity College Dublin (TCD), and Maynooth, currently manage the repository and implement its policies, guidelines and training. The Department of Education and Skills has primarily funded DRI since 2016 through the Higher Education Authority and the Irish Research Council. As of 2018, DRI is home to over 28,000 items.

References

  1. Erin Scime (8 December 2009). "The Content Strategist as Digital Curator". A List Apart.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Digital Curation". Smithsonian Institution Archives. Archived from the original on October 13, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  3. Rusbridge, C.; Buneman, P.; Burnhill, P.; Giaretta, D.; Ross, S.; Lyon, L.; Atkinson, M. (2005). "The Digital Curation Centre: A Vision for Digital Curation" (PDF). 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technology (PDF). p. 31. doi:10.1109/LGDI.2005.1612461. ISBN   978-0-7803-9228-1. S2CID   20810596.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "What is Digital Curation?". Digital Curation Centre . Retrieved 2008-04-01.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elizabeth Yakel (2007). "Digital curation". OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives. 23 (4): 335–340. doi:10.1108/10650750710831466. S2CID   33219560.
  6. "Digital Curation - MLIS Career Pathway". SJSU School of Information. 5 October 2020. Archived from the original on October 19, 2021. Retrieved November 4, 2022.
  7. E. Curry, A. Freitas, and S. O'Riáin, "The Role of Community-Driven Data Curation for Enterprises," Archived 2012-01-23 at the Wayback Machine in Linking Enterprise Data, D. Wood, Ed. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2010, pp. 25-47.
  8. 1 2 Post, Colin (2021). "The Art of Digital Curation: Co-operative Stewardship of Net-Based Art" (PDF). Archivaria. 92: 6–47.
  9. Yakel, Elizabeth (2013-04-13). "Digital curation". OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives. 23 (4): 335–340. doi:10.1108/10650750710831466. S2CID   33219560.
  10. United States. 1993. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Washington, DC: Produced by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, in conjunction with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, and the National Park Service.
  11. United States. 1990. 36 CFR Part 79: Curation of Federally-owned and Administered Archaeological Collections. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dallas, Costis (2016-12-01). "Digital curation beyond the "wild frontier": a pragmatic approach". Archival Science. 16 (4): 421–457. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9252-6. ISSN   1389-0166. S2CID   143306405.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Committee on Future Career Opportunities and Educational Requirements for Digital Curation; Board on Research Data and Information; Policy And Global, Affairs; National Research Council (2015). Preparing the Workforce for Digital Curation. Committee on Future Career Opportunities Educational Requirements for Digital Curation / Board on Research Data Information / Policy and Global Affairs / National Research Council. doi:10.17226/18590. ISBN   9780309296946. PMID   25950079.{{cite book}}: |last3= has generic name (help)
  14. 1 2 3 4 Beagrie, Neil (2008). "Digital Curation for Science, Digital Libraries, and Individuals". International Journal of Digital Curation. 1: 3–16. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v1i1.2 (inactive 2024-11-11).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Higgins, Sarah (2008). "The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model". International Journal of Digital Curation. 3: 134–140. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48 (inactive 2024-11-11). hdl: 1842/3350 . S2CID   11415404 . Retrieved 2018-02-19.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  16. Lazorchak, Butch (August 23, 2011). "Digital Preservation, Digital Curation, Digital Stewardship: What's in (Some) Names?". Library of Congress. Archived from the original on September 30, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
  17. Borgman, Christine L. Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN   9780262327862. OCLC   900409008.
  18. Weber, Nicholas; Palmer, Carole L; Chao, Tiffany (October 2012). "Current Trends and Future Directions in Data Curation Research and Education". Journal of Web Librarianship. 6 (4): 305–320. doi:10.1080/19322909.2012.730358. hdl:2142/48759. S2CID   62237710.
  19. Ray, Joyce (2009). "Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals". Museum Management and Curatorship. 24 (4): 357–368. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720. S2CID   143147784.
  20. Higgins, Sarah (2011). "Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline". International Journal of Digital Curation. 6 (2): 78–88. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191 (inactive 2024-11-11).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  21. 1 2 Katuu, Shadrack. (2012). Enterprise Content Management and Digital Curation Applications Maturity Model Connections.
  22. Paul Watry (November 2007). "Digital Preservation Theory and Application: Transcontinental Persistent Archives Testbed Activity". The International Journal of Digital Curation. 2 (2). Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved September 12, 2022.
  23. A Lee, Christopher. (2011). Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model. 10.1201/b11499-56.
  24. "About the DCC". Website. Digital Curation Centre. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  25. Parsinejad, H.; Choi, I.; Yari, M. (2021). "Production of Iranian Architectural Assets for Representation in Museums: Theme of Museum-Based Digital Twin". Body, Space and Technology. 20 (1): 61–74. doi: 10.16995/bst.364 .
  26. Committee on Planning a Global Library of the Mathematical Sciences (2014). Read "Developing a 21st Century Global Library for Mathematics Research" at NAP.edu. arXiv: 1404.1905 . doi:10.17226/18619. ISBN   978-0-309-29848-3. S2CID   119149004.
  27. Ion, Patrick (2016), "The Effort to Realize a Global Digital Mathematics Library", Mathematical Software – ICMS 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9725, Springer International Publishing, pp. 458–466, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42432-3_59, ISBN   9783319424316
  28. Lavoie, Brian (2014). The Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model: Introductory Guide (Report). doi: 10.7207/twr14-02 . Retrieved September 12, 2022.
  29. Dhakal, Kerry (15 April 2019). "Unpaywall". Journal of the Medical Library Association. 107 (2): 286–288. doi:10.5195/jmla.2019.650. PMC   6466485 .
  30. Digital Curation Centre
  31. Digital Preservation Coalition
  32. "We must fight to preserve digital information". The Economist. 2019-02-21. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 2019-05-01.
  33. Tibbo, Helen R. (2015). "Digital Curation Education and Training: From Digitization to Graduate Curricula to MOOCs". International Journal of Digital Curation. 10: 144–153. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.352 (inactive 2024-11-11).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  34. DigCCurr 2007 - an international symposium on Digital Curation, April 18-20, 2007
  35. "1st African Digital Management and Curation Conference and Workshop". African Digital Curation Conference. 13 February 2008. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
  36. "Homepage". DCC because good research needs good data. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
  37. "Current Issue". International Journal of Digital Curation. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
  38. "International Journal of Digital Curation". www.ijdc.net. Retrieved 2019-05-01.
  39. "The ImageStore Project - ImageWeb". Archived from the original on 2009-05-19. Retrieved 2009-05-18.
  40. Digital Curation Centre: DCC SCARP Project
  41. Whyte, Angus; Job, Dominic; Giles, Stephen; Lawrie, Stephen (July 2008). "Meeting Curation Challenges in a Neuroimaging Group". The International Journal of Digital Curation. 3 (1): 171–181. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.53 (inactive 2024-11-11). Retrieved April 25, 2022.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  42. Frey, J. 'Sharing and Collaboration' keynote presentation at UK e-Science All Hands Meeting Archived 2008-08-20 at the Wayback Machine , 8–11 September 2008, Edinburgh