Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy hearings

Last updated
See Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy documents for publicly released documents and hearings transcripts.

The United States House Committee on the Judiciary and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, have oversight authority over Department of Justice (DOJ). In 2007 it conducted public and closed-door oversight and investigative hearings on the DOJ's interactions with the White House and staff members of the Executive Office of the President. A routine oversight hearing on January 18, 2007 by the Senate committee was the first public congressional occasion that Attorney General Gonzales responded to questions about dismissed United States Attorneys (USAs). Both committees invited or subpoenaed past and present Department of Justice officers and staff to appear and testify during 2007, and both committees requested or subpoenaed documents, and made the documents that were produced publicly available.

Contents

Calendar of public hearings

Hearing dates with witnesses

Witness: Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General
Witnesses:
Senator Mark Pryor (D-Arkansas)
Paul J. McNulty, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Mary Jo White, Partner, Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, New York, NY
Laurie L. Levenson, Professor of Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, CA
Stuart M. Gerson, Partner, Epstein Becker & Green, Washington, DC
Witnesses for both hearings:
William Moschella, principal associate deputy attorney general, Department of Justice
Carol Lam, Former U.S. Attorney
David Iglesias, Former U.S. Attorney
Bud Cummins, Former U.S. Attorney
John McKay, Former U.S. Attorney
Daniel Bogden, Former U.S. Attorney
Paul Charlton, Former U.S. Attorney
John Smietanka, Former U.S. Attorney
Representative Darrell Issa, R-California
Former Representataive Asa Hutchinson
Former Deputy Attorney General George Terwilliger
Witness: D. Kyle Sampson, former Chief of Staff to Attorney General Gonzales
Witness: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Witness: James Comey, Former Deputy Attorney General
Witness: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Witness: James Comey, Former Deputy Attorney General
Witness: Monica K. Goodling, former DOJ White House Liaison
Panel 1: Bradley J. Schlozman, Associate Counsel to the Director, Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
Former Interim U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri; Former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Former Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Panel 2: Todd Graves, Former U.S. Attorney, Western District of Missouri, Kansas City, MO
Witness List:
Charles Schumer, United States Senator [D-NY]
Barack Obama, United States Senator [D-IL]
Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General, State of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Jack B. Johnson, County Executive, Prince George’s County, MD, Upper Marlboro, MD
Hilary O. Shelton, Director, Washington Bureau, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People [NAACP], Washington, DC
John Trasvina, President and General Counsel, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund MALDEF, Los Angeles, CA
Richard Briffault, Joseph P. Chamberlain Professor of Legislation, Columbia Law School, New York, NY
William B. Canfield, Principal, Williams & Jensen PLLC, Washington, DC
Peter N. Kirsanow, Commissioner, United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington, DC
Nominations to the Federal Election Commission
Steven T. Walther (Nevada), Nominated to term expiring April 30, 2009 (vice Scott E. Thomas, term expired)
Robert D. Lenhard (Maryland), Nominated to term expiring April 30, 2011 (vice Danny L. McDonald, term expired)
David V. Mason (Virginia), Nominated to term expiring April 30, 2009 (reappointment)
Hans von Spakovsky (Georgia), Nominated to term expiring April 30, 2011 - Recess appointee to the FEC (vice Bradley A. Smith, resigned)
Private interview: [4]
Mary Beth Buchanan, U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, former director of the U.S. Justice Department's Executive Office for United States Attorneys from June 2004 to June 2005


Witness: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Concerning Oversight of the Department of Justice. [5]

Gonzales testimony

Senate Judiciary Committee - January 18, 2007

Gonzales stated: [6]

"What we're trying to do is ensure that for the people in each of these respective districts, we have the very best possible representative for the Department of Justice," Gonzales testified, adding later: "I would never, ever make a change in a United States attorney for political reasons or if it would in any way jeopardize an ongoing serious investigation. I just would not do it."

Senate Judiciary Committee - April 19, 2007

Alberto Gonzales was scheduled to testify before Congress on April 17, 2007 [7] (Link to Gonzales's April 19, 2007 opening statement). In the aftermath of the mass shooting at Virginia Tech, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy postponed the hearing until April 19. [8] In advance of his testimony, a separate Gonzales statement was published in the Washington Post on April 15, 2007. He said "While I accept responsibility for my role in commissioning this management review process, I want to make some fundamental points abundantly clear. I know that I did not -- and would not -- ask for the resignation of any U.S. attorney for an improper reason. Furthermore, I have no basis to believe that anyone involved in this process sought the removal of a U.S. attorney for an improper reason." [9] The Gonzales statement responded to the allegations that his previous testimony contradicted Sampson testimony before Congress. Gonzales stated: "While I have never sought to deceive Congress or the American people, I also know that I created confusion with some of my recent statements about my role in this matter. To be clear: I directed my then-deputy chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to initiate this process; fully knew that it was occurring; and approved the final recommendations. Sampson periodically updated me on the review. As I recall, his updates were brief, relatively few in number and focused primarily on the review process. During those conversations, to my knowledge, I did not make decisions about who should or should not be asked to resign." [9]

On April 19, 2007, Gonzales testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Gonzales received intense questioning from both the Democratic and Republican members on the committee. Many Republicans on the committee openly criticised the attorney general and his handling of the matter questioning his honesty, competence and stating that he should "suffer the consequences" from the controversial firings. [10] Gonzales also admitted during the testimony that when he ordered the firing of the US attorneys he did not know the reason for firing two of them. The attorney general stated that he "didn't have an independent basis or recollection" about the job performance of Nevada U.S. Attorney Daniel G. Bogden. With regards to Chiara, Gonzales stated, "Quite candidly . . . I don't recall the reason why I accepted" staff advice on why to dismiss Chiarra and only after the fact did Gonzales learn "it was a question of . . . poor-management issues." [11] In another interesting exchange, Gonzales stated that he had approved the decision but didn't recall when the decision was made. ("'Well, how can you be sure you made the decision?' Mr. Leahy asked."'Senator, I recall making the decision from this—I recall making the decision,' Mr. Gonzales replied. "'When?' Mr. Leahy responded."'Senator,' Mr. Gonzales replied. 'I don't recall when the decision was made.') [12] Gonzales stated more than 60 times that he "couldn't recall" certain incidents. [13]

After Gonzales's April 19, 2007 testimony to the Judiciary Committee, both Senators Leahy and Specter expressed their disappointment with the results. Both stated that they still do not have a clear explanation of the reasons the eight attorneys were fired, with Leahy suggesting that political influence was the likely explanation, and Specter suggesting that incompetence might be the likely explanation. [14] Both Senators also expressed the concern that, either way, the controversy was undermining the integrity of the Department of Justice. The White House put out a statement that day saying "the president was pleased with the attorney general's testimony, and that he felt he answered [the] questions, and that he had admitted mistakes were made, but that he has the full confidence of the president." Leahy replied to the interviewer about the White House statement: "Well, the president has set a very low bar, indeed." [14] CNN later reported that White House insiders thought that Gonzales had hurt himself with his recent testimony and described his performance before the Judiciary committee as "going down in flames," "not doing himself any favors," and "predictable." [15]

A few days later, President Bush reiterated "The Attorney General ... gave a very candid assessment, and answered every question he could possibly answer, honestly answer, in a way that increased my confidence in his ability to do the job....[A]s the investigation, the hearings went forward, it was clear that the Attorney General broke no law, did no wrongdoing. And some senators didn't like his explanation, but he answered as honestly as he could. This is an honest, honorable man, in whom I have confidence." [16] Nevertheless, Gonzales continued to come under increasing criticism, including from "key GOP lawmakers". [17]

House Judiciary Committee - May 10, 2007

Alberto Gonzales testified before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary regarding the dismissal of U.S. Attorneys. [18] His prepared oral, and extended written statements were released in advance of the hearing at the House Judiciary Committee. [19] [20] Link to Gonzales's oral statement May 10, 2007 Link to Gonzales's extended written statement, May 10, 2007 He provided no additional information regarding the controversy to the frustration and incredulity of many on the committee. He "acknowledged for the first time Thursday that [other] U.S. attorneys might have resigned under pressure from the Justice Department, but said their departures were unrelated to the controversial firings of eight prosecutors last year." [21] Gonzales testified that there was nothing improper about the dismissal or resignations of Graves, Heffelginger, or Yang. He addressed the cases of Biskupic in Wisconsin and Paulose in Minnesota. Unlike the April 19, 2007 hearing before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, several Republicans came to the defense of Gonzales, including Lamar Smith of Texas. [22]

Senate Judiciary Committee - July 24, 2007

McNulty testimony

Senate Judiciary Committee - February 6, 2007

Concerns expressed by Senators Feinstein and Pryor concerning the Senate's prerogative in confirming U.S. Attorney nominations in early January were followed up by hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 6, 2007 called by Senator Schumer (D, New York) with Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty as witness. [23] [24] McNulty underscored that the seven were fired for job performance issues, and not political considerations. McNulty later called Senator Schumer by telephone to apologize for that inaccurate characterization of the firings, however. [25] At least six of the seven had recently received outstanding job performance ratings. McNulty testified that Bud Cummins, the U.S. Attorney for Arkansas, was removed to install a former aide to Karl Rove and Republican National Committee opposition research director, the 37-year-old Timothy Griffin. [26] Cummins, apparently, "was ousted after Harriet E. Miers, the former White House counsel, intervened on behalf of Griffin." [27] In subsequent closed-door testimony on April 27, 2007 to the committee, McNulty said that days after the February hearing, he learned that White House officials had not revealed to him White House influence and discussions on creating the list. [28] [29]

McNulty's testimony that the attorneys were fired for "performance related issues" caused the attorneys to come forward in protest. [28] [30] [31]

Sampson testimony

Senate Judiciary Committee - March 29, 2007

Sampson appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 29, 2007 to discuss the firings. At that hearing, Sampson stated that, contrary to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's prior statements, the Attorney General had been involved in the final decision to dismiss the US Attorneys. "I don't think the attorney general's statement that he was not involved in any discussions of U.S. attorney removals was accurate...I remember discussing with him this process of asking certain U.S. attorneys to resign." [32]

In response Gonzales stated "I don't recall being involved in deliberations involving the question of whether or not a U.S. attorney should or should not be asked to resign...I signed off on the recommendations and signed off on the implementation plan. And that's the extent of my involvement...I know what I did and I know the motivations for the decisions that I made were not based on improper reasons." [33] Media attention has highlighting Sampson's inability to recall the events surrounding the Dismissal of the U.S. Attorneys. Sampson could not recall information asked by committee members over a hundred times. [34]

In a press conference on April 3, 2007, President Bush responded to questions about the attorney general and the ongoing controversy by stating: "Attorney General Al Gonzales is an honorable and honest man and he has my full confidence...I will remind you there is no credible evidence that there has been any wrongdoing...I appreciate [the dismissed US Attorneys'] service. I'm sorry that these hearings and all this stuff have besmirched their reputations. It's certainly not the intent of anybody in this administration." [35]

On April 13, 2007, documents were released in response to further Congressional inquiry that appeared to contradict parts of Sampson's testimony. Sampson said during his testimony that "[he] did not have in mind any replacements for any of the seven who were asked to resign" on December 7, 2006. The released emails showed that Sampson had identified five Bush administration insiders as potential replacements for sitting U.S. attorneys months before those prosecutors were fired: Jeffrey A. Taylor, now chief prosecutor in the District of Columbia, Deborah Rhodes, now the U.S. attorney in Alabama, Rachel L. Brand, head of the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy, Daniel Levin, a former senior Justice and White House official who was listed as a San Francisco candidate, and Tim Griffin, a former aide to presidential adviser Karl Rove who was later appointed the top federal prosecutor in Little Rock. In response to this information, Sampson's attorney stated that these candidates were only tentative suggestions and never seriously considered. Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the list "reflects Kyle Sampson's initial thoughts" and "in no way contradicts the department's prior statements" about the lack of a candidate list."

Goodling testimony

Monica Goodling served in the Department of Justice and was the Justice Department's liaison to the White House. [36] [37] As such, she had helped coordinate the dismissal of the attorneys with the White House. [36] Congress had called Goodling to testify regarding her role in the dismissals, but after originally agreeing to appear, Goodling cancelled, citing the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. [38] [39] On April 6, 2007, Monica Goodling resigned from her position at the Department of Justice. [36]

House Judiciary Committee - May 23, 2007

Goodling appeared before the House Judiciary Committee, on May 23, 2007, under a grant of limited immunity. She provided to the committee a written statement that she read at the start of her testimony. [40] [41] In response to questions during the hearing, Goodling stated that she had "crossed the line" and broke civil service laws about hiring, and improperly weighed political factors in considering applicants for career positions at the Department of Justice. [42] [43] Link to The Washington Post transcript of the hearing.

Goodling cited McNulty's testimony to the Committee as being "incomplete or inaccurate," and stated that McNulty should have properly disclosed to the committee his: [44]

(1) knowledge of White House role in creating the list of USAs to dismiss;
(2) knowledge of the White House role in the selection of Tim Griffin as the interim USA;
(3) the DOJ's assessment of the Parsky Commission, an evaluation committee set up in California to assess, screen and put forward candidates for political appointments such as for U.S. attorneys;
(4) knowledge of allegations that Tim Griffin conducted vote caging, a potentially illegal partisan effort remove targeted populations from the voting registration lists, during the 2004 Bush presidential campaign. (Such allegations would make Griffin's confirmation by the Senate more difficult.)

McNulty responded in a press release from the DOJ, the same day as the hearing, stating:

I testified truthfully at the Feb. 6, 2007, hearing based on what I knew at that time. Ms. Goodling's characterization of my testimony is wrong and not supported by the extensive record of documents and testimony already provided to Congress. [45]

Sara Taylor testimony

On July 11, 2007, Sara Taylor, former top aide to Karl Rove, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. She was granted the unusual allowance of having her attorney, W. Neil Eggleston, next to her at the witness table to advise her on which questions she could answer and remain in accord with Bush's claim of executive privilege. Throughout Taylor's testimony, she refused to answer many questions, saying "I have a very clear letter from [White House counsel] Mr. [Fred] Fielding. That letter says and has asked me to follow the president's assertion of executive privilege." [46] Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) dismissed the claims and warned Taylor she was "in danger of drawing a criminal contempt of Congress citation". [46] Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) took issue with the claim as well, telling Taylor

You seem to be selective in the use of the presidential privilege. It seems like you're saying that, 'Yes, I'm giving you all the information I can,' when it's self-serving to the White House, but not allowing us to have the information to make independent judgment. [46]

Leahy added

I do note your answer that you did not discuss these matters with the president and, to the best of your knowledge, he was not involved is going to make some nervous at the White House because it seriously undercuts his claim of executive privilege if he was not involved. [46]

He also said

It's apparent that this White House is contemptuous of the Congress and feels it does not have to explain itself to anyone, not to the people's representatives in Congress nor to the American people. [47]

In summary, Taylor told the Senate that she

"did not talk to or meet with President Bush about removing federal prosecutors before eight of them were fired", she had no knowledge on whether Bush was involved in any way in the firings, her resignation had nothing to do with the controversy, "she did not recall ordering the addition or deletion of names to the list of prosecutors to be fired", and she refuted the testimony of Kyle Sampson, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' chief of staff, that she sought "to avoid submitting a new prosecutor, Tim Griffin, through Senate confirmation." [46] [48]

Related Research Articles

Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing the information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its area of constitutional activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberto Gonzales</span> 80th United States Attorney General

Alberto R. Gonzales is an American lawyer who served as the 80th United States Attorney General from 2005 to 2007 and is the highest-ranking Hispanic American in executive government to date. He previously served as Secretary of State of Texas, as a Texas Supreme Court Justice, and as White House Counsel, becoming the first Hispanic to hold that office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harriet Miers</span> American lawyer and Supreme Court nominee

Harriet Ellan Miers is an American lawyer who served as White House counsel to President George W. Bush from 2005 to 2007. A member of the Republican Party since 1988, she previously served as White House staff secretary from 2001 to 2003 and White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy from 2003 until 2005. In 2005, Miers was nominated by Bush to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, but—in the face of bipartisan opposition—asked Bush to withdraw her nomination. Following her withdrawal in 2007, Miers returned to private practice, becoming a partner in the litigation and public policy group at Locke Lord.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Comey</span> Former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (born 1960)

James Brien Comey Jr. is an American lawyer who was the seventh director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from 2013 until his termination in May 2017. Comey was a registered Republican for most of his adult life; however, in 2016, he described himself as unaffiliated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul McNulty</span> American lawyer (born 1958)

Paul Joseph McNulty is an American attorney and university administrator who is currently the ninth president of Grove City College. He served as the Deputy Attorney General of the United States from March 17, 2006, to July 26, 2007. Prior to that, he was the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented midterm dismissal of seven United States attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. attorney positions for political advantage. The allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters. The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bud Cummins</span> American lawyer

Harry Earnest Cummins, III, known as Bud Cummins, is an American attorney, businessman and politician. He served as United States Attorney with five years of service from 2001 to 2006 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul K. Charlton</span> Former United States Attorney for Arizona

Paul K. Charlton is a former United States Attorney and current partner at the law firm of Dentons US LLP in the firm's Phoenix, Arizona office. Charlton concentrates his practice on high-profile and complex litigation, internal investigations and white-collar criminal defense. Charlton also represents a number of Arizona Native American governments, including Ak-Chin, Salt River Pima-Maricopa, Haulapai, the Navajo Nation, and Tohono O'odham.

D. Kyle Sampson was the chief of staff and counselor of United States attorney general Alberto Gonzales. He resigned on March 12, 2007, amid the controversy surrounding the firing of eight United States attorneys in 2006 and was cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in July 2010. In October 2007, Sampson joined the law firm of Hunton & Williams LLP as a partner in the firm's food and drug practice, where his practice focuses on FDA regulatory and enforcement matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tim Griffin</span> American lawyer & politician (born 1968)

John Timothy Griffin is an American lawyer and politician serving as the 57th attorney general of Arkansas. He previously served as the 20th lieutenant governor of Arkansas, from 2015 to 2023. A member of the Republican Party, he previously was the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas between 2006 and 2007 and U.S. Representative for Arkansas's 2nd congressional district from 2011 to 2015. Griffin defeated Democrat John Burkhalter for lieutenant governor in 2014 and served under Governor Asa Hutchinson. In summer 2020, Griffin announced his candidacy for the 2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election, but withdrew from the race in February 2021 to run for Arkansas Attorney General instead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brett Tolman</span> American lawyer

Brett L. Tolman is a former United States Attorney for the District of Utah from July 2006 to December 2009. Before becoming U.S. Attorney, Tolman worked as counsel in the Senate Judiciary Committee for committee chairs Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and then Arlen Specter (R-PA) during the 109th United States Congress. Tolman's most noteworthy work in the Senate is his role in the passage of the 2005 Patriot Act reauthorization. He was instrumental in the revisions to the appointment process of interim U.S. Attorneys and is a major figure in the dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy.

Monica Marie Goodling is a former United States government lawyer and Republican political appointee in the George W. Bush administration who is best known for her role in the Dismissal of U.S. Attorneys Controversy in 2006. She was the principal deputy director of public affairs for the United States Department of Justice, serving under Attorneys General John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales. A Department of Justice investigation concluded that she had violated the law, but she was not prosecuted because she had been granted immunity in exchange for her testimony. The Virginia State Bar publicly reprimanded Goodling in May 2011 for having "improperly utilized political affiliation and other political considerations when making hiring decisions for career positions."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Moschella</span>

William Emil Moschella is an American lawyer and former associate deputy attorney general.

Michael J. Elston is a United States lawyer who serves as acting secretary of the board of governors for the United States Postal Service (USPS), in Washington, D.C. Elston has served as the associate general counsel and chief ethics and compliance officer for the USPS since 2014. From November 2005 to June 2007, he was a political appointee in the administration of President George W. Bush, serving as the chief of staff and counselor, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, before resigning in the wake of the dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. He was appointed as an Assistant United States Attorney in 1999 by Attorney General Janet Reno.

Steven M. Biskupic is a former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin serving under Attorneys General John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey. He was appointed by George W. Bush in May 2002. Prior to his appointment, Biskupic served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for 13 years, specializing in the prosecution of white-collar crime. Biskupic stepped down after the 2008 election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bradley Schlozman</span>

Bradley Joseph Schlozman is an American attorney who served as acting head of the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice under Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. A member of the Republican Party, Schlozman was appointed by Gonzales as the interim U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, replacing Todd Graves, and he assumed that office on March 23, 2006. In April 2007, Schlozman left the U.S. Attorney position to work at the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. He was succeeded by John F. Wood as US attorney.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dismissed U.S. attorneys summary</span>

This article about dismissed U.S. attorneys summarizes the circumstances surrounding a number of U.S. attorneys dismissed from office in the United States Department of Justice in 2006. Eight were dismissed In December 2006, and others may have been forced out of office under similar circumstances in 2005 and 2006. The manner of the firings, the congressional response to them, and the explanations offered by Bush administration officials are aspects of a political controversy starting in the first quarter of 2007. As of May 2007 a clear explanation of why the attorneys were dismissed had not been put forward by the Bush administration or the Department of Justice leadership. There are in total 93 U.S. attorneys that serve 94 Federal district courts.

A detailed chronology of events in the dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry E. Petersen</span> American lawyer

Henry E. Petersen was an attorney and United States federal government official. He served as Assistant U.S. Attorney General during the Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford administrations. He also engaged in ethically questionable communications with Nixon and his staff, providing inside information about the Watergate investigation prior to the appointment of the Special Prosecutor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Beth Buchanan</span> American lawyer

Mary Beth Buchanan (née Kotcella) is the former United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. She was nominated by George W. Bush on September 5, 2001, and confirmed by the United States Senate on September 14, 2001.

References

  1. "TIME CHANGE: Preserving Prosecutorial Independence: Is the Department of Justice Politicizing the Hiring and Firing of U.S. Attorneys? -- Part V". Calendar, Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate. 2007-05-29. Archived from the original on 2007-05-30. Retrieved 2007-05-31.
  2. "Prevention of Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation in Federal Elections: S. 453". Calendar: Senate Committee on the Judiciary Committee. United States Senate. 2007-05-21. Archived from the original on 2007-05-30. Retrieved 2007-05-31.
  3. "Nominations to the Federal Election Commission: Wednesday, June 13, 2007". Hearings. United States Committee on Rules and Administration. n.d. Archived from the original on May 30, 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-13.
  4. Ward, Paula Reed (2007-06-15). "In U.S. Attorney's Offices, Help Wanted". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 2007-06-18.
  5. "Senate Judiciary Committee Calendar". 2007-07-24. Archived from the original on 2007-07-25. Retrieved 2007-07-25.
  6. Eggen, Dan (2007-04-19). "Prosecutor Firings Not Political, Gonzales Says: Attorney General Acknowledges, Defends Actions". The Washington Post . Retrieved 2007-05-30.
  7. Gonzales, Alberto. Statement of Alberto Gonzales [ permanent dead link ] Full title: Statement of Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, before the Committee of the Judiciary, United States Senate. Concerning Oversight of the Justice Department. (Opening statement released by the Justice Department April 16, 2007, before the Judiciary Committee hearing.) C-SPAN April 16, 2007. Retrieved April 16, 2007.
  8. Gonzales hearing postponed, SFGate.com , April 16, 2007
  9. 1 2 Alberto R. Gonzales, Nothing Improper Washington Post, April 15, 2007
  10. Stout, David (2007-04-19). "Gonzales Faces Anger From Both Sides on Senate Panel". The New York Times . Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  11. Goldstein, Amy (2007-04-19). "Gonzales Says He Didn't Know Why Two Were Fired". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  12. Johnston, David; Lipton, Eric (2007-04-20). "Gonzales Endures Harsh Session With Senate Panel". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  13. "Administration officials say Gonzales should step down". CNN. 2007-04-20. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  14. 1 2 Gonzales Faces Tough Questioning in Senate Archived 2014-01-19 at the Wayback Machine (Transcript) Online NewsHour Public Broadcasting System (PBS), April 19, 2007. Retrieved April 20, 2007.
  15. "White House insiders: Gonzales hurt himself before panel". CNN. 2007-04-19. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  16. President Bush Pleased with Attorney General's Testimony Press Release. The White House, April 23, 2007. Retrieved April 25, 2007.
  17. "Gonzales vows to stay on as attorney general". CNN. 2007-04-19. Archived from the original on 2007-04-26. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  18. Congressional Quarterly Transcript Service (2007-05-11). "Gonzales Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee: Hearing on Oversight of the Department of Justice, May 10, 2007 (Transcript)". Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-05-15.
  19. Alberto Gonzales. Prepared Remarks of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales before the House Judiciary Oversight Hearing, May 10, 2007. Archived May 12, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Department of Justice, May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 19, 2007.
  20. Alberto Gonzales. Statement of Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives: Concerning Oversight of the Department of Justice. May 10, 2007 Archived October 20, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Department of Justice. May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 18, 2007.
  21. Schmitt, Richard B. (2007-05-11). "Attorney general frustrates Democrats". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on 2007-05-24. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
  22. Eggen, Dan; Paul Kane (2007-05-11). "House GOP Stands Behind Gonzales". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-05-13.
  23. Notice of Rescheduled Committee Hearing, Tuesday, February 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m Archived February 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Hearing on "Preserving Prosecutorial Independence: Is the Department of Justice Politicizing the Hiring and Firing of U.S. Attorneys?" United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary January 30, 2007. Retrieved April 16, 2007.
  24. Tom Brune (2007-03-31). "Schumer again takes aim on White House". Newsday.com.[ dead link ]
  25. "MTP Transcript for Mar. 18, 2007". NBC News Meet the Press. 2007-03-18. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
  26. Kevin Johnson (2007-02-06). "Prosecutor fired so ex-Rove aide could get his job". USA Today.
  27. David Johnston (2007-02-16). "White House Is Reported to Be Linked to a Dismissal". The New York Times.
  28. 1 2 Johnston, David (2007-05-15). "Gonzales's Deputy Quits Justice Department". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-05-17.
  29. Taylor, Marisa; Margaret Talev (2007-05-03). "Former deputy attorney general official defends fired U.S. attorneys". McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved 2007-05-15.
  30. Adrienne Packer (2007-02-08). "U.S. attorney rebuts claim performance led to firing". Las Vegas Review Journal. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
  31. Dan Eggen (2007-02-09). "Fired Prosecutor Disputes Justice Dept. Allegation". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
  32. Jordan, Lara Jakes (2007-03-29). "Ex-aide contradicts Gonzales on firings". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2007-03-31. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  33. McNicholas, Kevin (2007-03-30). "Gonzales denies talks on attorney firings". Reuters . Retrieved 2007-04-07.[ dead link ]
  34. Milbank, Dana (2007-03-30). "Taking One for the Team, When He Could Remember". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-04-25.
  35. "Bush backs Gonzales, says no evidence of wrongdoing". Reuters. 2007-03-31. Retrieved 2007-04-07.[ dead link ]
  36. 1 2 3 Stout, David; Johnsont, David (2007-04-06). "A Top Aide to the Attorney General Resigns". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  37. Schmitt, Richard B. (2007-05-23). "Goodling: a power player behind the scenes at the Justice Dept: The former Justice insider, a mystery to many, is set to testify under immunity in Congress on the U.S. attorneys' firings". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on 2013-01-27. Retrieved 2007-05-29.
  38. Letter from Goodling's attorneys to Senator Patrick Leahy, Judiciary Committee Archived 2007-06-01 at the Wayback Machine , March 24, 2007
  39. Dan Eggen (2007-03-26). "Gonzales's Senior Counselor Refuses to Testify". The Washington Post.
  40. Dan, Eggen; Carol D. Leonnig (2007-05-23). "Officials Describe Interference by Former Gonzales Aide". Washington Post. pp. A04. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  41. Goodling, Monica (2007-05-23). "Remarks of Monica Goodling before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives" (PDF). Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-05-30. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  42. Stout, David (2007-05-23). "Ex-Gonzales Aide Testifies, 'I Crossed the Line'". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-05-23.
  43. "Goodling says she didn't discuss firings with White House". CNN. May 23, 2007. Retrieved 2010-05-01.
  44. Scherer, Michael (2007-05-23). "Goodling's McNulty-bashing". Salon. Salon.com. Archived from the original on 2007-05-27. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  45. Scherer, Michael (2007-05-23). "McNulty hits back at Goodling". Salon. Salon.com. Archived from the original on 2007-05-27. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
  46. 1 2 3 4 5 Kwame Holman (July 11, 2007). "New Testimony on Fired Federal Prosecutors". PBS Newshour. Archived from the original on January 19, 2014. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
  47. "Excerpts from the Sara M. Taylor hearing". Associated Press. 2007-07-11.[ dead link ]
  48. Laurie Kellman (2007-07-11). "Aide: Didn't Talk to Bush About Firings". London. Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 25, 2007.