A dual-mode bus, also known as a duobus or bimodal bus, is a bus that can operate using two independent power sources. Most commonly, this refers to a vehicle that combines the features of an electric trolleybus, drawing power from overhead lines, and a conventional bus, powered by a diesel engine. [1]
The term is primarily used for buses with two full-fledged, powerful propulsion systems, designed for regular service on routes that are only partially equipped with overhead wires. [2] This distinguishes them from trolleybuses equipped with a small auxiliary power unit (APU), which is only intended for short-distance, low-speed maneuvers such as bypassing obstacles or navigating depots. [2] A separate term, IMC Electric bus (for In-Motion Charging), is used for modern vehicles that combine overhead wire operation with a large battery pack, allowing for significant wireless travel without a fossil fuel engine.
The primary advantage of a dual-mode bus is its flexibility. It can operate as a zero-emission electric vehicle in city centers or on heavily used corridors where overhead lines are installed, offering benefits like high acceleration, low noise, and no local air pollution. On suburban sections of the route or in areas where installing overhead lines is impractical or too expensive, it can switch to its diesel engine and operate with the same range and flexibility as a standard bus. [1]
This capability allows for one-seat rides on routes that transition from wired to unwired sections, eliminating the need for passengers to transfer. It also provides operational redundancy; the bus can continue to run during power outages or when overhead lines are damaged by switching to its diesel engine. Furthermore, routes can be extended into new areas before the wire infrastructure is built. [3]
Despite their flexibility, dual-mode buses have several drawbacks that have limited their widespread adoption. The inclusion of two complete powertrains (an electric motor and control systems, plus a diesel engine, fuel tank, and transmission) significantly increases the vehicle's weight. For example, the electrical equipment on a Mercedes-Benz O 405 GTD added six tons to its weight. [4] This extra weight leads to higher energy consumption in both modes of operation.
Dual-mode buses are also more expensive to purchase and maintain than either a standard trolleybus or a diesel bus. The complexity of the dual systems can lead to lower reliability and higher maintenance costs. The space required for the additional equipment can also reduce passenger capacity, impacting the vehicle's economic efficiency. [1] Finally, the process of switching between power modes requires the bus to stop, which can add to overall journey times. [1]
Early precursors to the modern dual-mode bus concept include the "All-Service Vehicle" in New Jersey and dual-power vehicles in several European cities. However, the term "Duo-Bus" was first popularized in Esslingen am Neckar, Germany, initially for a battery-trolleybus hybrid in the 1970s. When that proved unsuccessful, Esslingen introduced a diesel-trolleybus model in 1979, which became the template for the modern dual-mode bus. [1]
The concept saw peak interest in the 1980s and 1990s, with several cities in Europe and North America adopting fleets. However, due to the operational challenges and high costs, many of these systems were short-lived. A significant number of dual-mode buses were prematurely retired, converted into either diesel-only buses or electric-only trolleybuses, or sold to other operators who did not use their dual-mode capability. [1]
Since the 2000s, advances in battery technology have led to the rise of in-motion charging (IMC) electric buses. These vehicles offer the same operational flexibility as diesel dual-mode buses but without the emissions, weight, and maintenance complexity of a combustion engine, effectively making the classic diesel duobus concept largely obsolete. [2] As of 2018, only two cities, Fribourg, Switzerland, and Boston, USA, were still operating diesel dual-mode bus systems, and Boston has since retired its fleet. [1] [5]
Excluding early precursors, a total of 438 series-production dual-mode buses have been built. The vast majority of these were articulated vehicles. [1]
| Manufacturer | Type | Production years | Electrical equipment | Units built | Primary operators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breda | ADPB 350 | 1988–1991 | AEG / Westinghouse | 236 | King County Metro (Seattle) |
| Renault | PER 180 H | 1982–1984 | (various) | 64 | Nancy, Saint-Étienne, Grenoble (France) |
| Daimler-Benz | Mercedes-Benz O 405 GTD | 1986–1995 | AEG | 47 | Esslingen, Essen (Germany); Bergen (Norway), and others |
| Neoplan | AN460LF | 2004–2006 | Škoda | 32 | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (Boston) |
| Neoplan | N 6121 | 1998 | Vossloh Kiepe | 27 | TL (Lausanne) |
| Volvo / Hess | B10M | 1987–1989 | BBC-Sécheron / ABB | 12 | TPF (Fribourg) |
| MAN / Hess | NGT 204 F | 2004 | Kiepe | 9 | TPF (Fribourg) |
| Daimler-Benz | O 305 GTD | 1983 | AEG | 4 | Esslingen, Essen (Germany) |
| Daimler-Benz | O 305 D/E (rigid) | 1979 | Bosch / Dornier | 2 | SVE (Esslingen) |
| Daimler-Benz | O 305 G D/E (articulated) | 1979 | Bosch / Dornier | 1 | SVE (Esslingen) |
| MAN | SG 240 H Duo | 1983 | Kiepe | 1 | Essener Verkehrs-AG (Essen) |
| MAN / Voith | SL 200 (prototype) | 1984 | BBC-Sécheron | 1 | Demonstrator vehicle |
| Daimler-Benz | O 405 GNTD | 1996 | Kiepe / ZF | 1 | Verkehrsbetriebe Zürich (Zürich) |
| Van Hool | AG300TD | 1993 | Kiepe | 1 | Connexxion (Arnhem) |
Media related to Dual-mode buses at Wikimedia Commons