Ear print analysis

Last updated
Human ear (sketch) Human Ear (sketch).jpg
Human ear (sketch)

Ear print analysis is used as a means of forensic identification intended as an identification tool similar to fingerprinting. An ear print is a two-dimensional reproduction of the parts of the outer ear that have touched a specific surface (most commonly the helix, antihelix, tragus and antitragus). [1] Ear prints and their use for identification were first discovered by Fritz Hirschi in 1965. [2] Fritz Hirschi was the first to identify a criminal using this method, in Switzerland in 1965 [3] and ear print analysis has also been successfully used to solve crimes in the UK and the Netherlands. [4] In addition to identification, the height of an ear imprint at a crime scene may also provide investigators with information regarding the stature of the perpetrator. [5]

Contents

In 2002–2005 the Forensic Ear Identification (FearID) research project commenced to analyse the use of ear print evidence in criminal investigations. [2] The research project was sponsored by the European Union to study the effectiveness of ear prints to be used as evidence in criminal investigations. [6] The project used ear prints from 1229 donors. [6] The European Commission is currently trying to create a database that will set the worldwide standard for ear print analysis. [7]

The reasoning behind the limited use of ear print analysis in modern day forensics is due to the complex nature of collection and analysis methods. There has been some success with ear print analysis but the collection methods of ear prints and the complexity of proving a print matches a specific ear makes the identification method unreliable. [1] [2] [8]

History

Fritz Hirschi, from Bern, Switzerland, was one of the first people to use ear prints for identification, in 1965. [9] Hirschi analysed two earmarks at the scene of a burglary in Bienne, Switzerland. [2] The earmarks were then used to observe if there was a connection between a more recent burglary where two men were arrested. The two men had their ear prints taken to compare to the previous marks left at the first burglary. Hirschi discovered that one of the two suspects had an ear print significantly similar to the ear mark at the first burglary, convincing Hirschi that he was involved with the most recent burglary. [2]

Use as evidence

The creation of the ear print identification system (similar to the fingerprint identification system) was developed by a University of Leicester Professor Guy Rutty along with a private forensics company. The team presented its work at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in Dallas. [4] [10] Rutty measured the ear and observed physical elements such as sex differences in the external auditory canal, where females have shorter canals than males. [10] The discoveries by Professor Guy Rutty of physical variations in the human ear opened the field of identification methods using ear prints. [10]

Ear prints have been used in criminal cases for identification in Holland, with more than 200 judicial cases. [1] Ear print databases are common in Spain, with history of criminal sentences using ear prints as evidence. [1]

FearID project

The Forensic Ear Identification (FearID) research project commenced in 2002 to analyse the use of ear print evidence in criminal investigations. The project was sponsored by the European Union and was composed of nine institutes from the United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. [2]

Methods of collection

The project used 1229 donors who donated three left and right ear prints. [6] The ear prints were collected using controlled methods. Donors pressed their ear up to a glass plate and were instructed to listen for a sound. Then the ear print was lifted with a black gel filter. [6] The research project aimed to standardise a method of ear print collection and accurately depict the print an ear may leave at a crime scene. Analysis of the ear print included details such as shape, size, Darwinian tubercles, creases, moles, piercings and scars. [6]

Limitations discovered in project

The methodology used in the FearID project where donors press their ear against a glass plate to depict the print at the scene is not valid to use for forensic investigations today. [11] This is due to the inability to control the force suspects place on the glass. Suspects may not cooperate, and prints may not be representative of reality. [11]

Limitations of ear print analysis

Ear print analysis is not used as a valid and reliable method for identification due to its lack of scientific research. Present day forensic analysis commonly uses DNA testing methods as it is more reliable and valid in court.

Factors affecting analysis

Ear print analysis can be greatly affected by certain factors: [2]

These factors outline the difficulties in creating specific methods to extract and analyse ear prints. Each factor affects the reliability and validity of the print. Additionally, a variety of ear prints can be made by the same ear due to these factors and the uniqueness of an ear print. [1] [8]

Use in court

New York City Police Dept. activities- taking Bertillon measurements-ear LCCN2006677371 New York City Police Dept. activities- taking Bertillon measurements-ear LCCN2006677371.jpg
New York City Police Dept. activities- taking Bertillon measurements-ear LCCN2006677371

There is a lack of jurisprudence, doctrinal studies and studies relating to comparative law on the significance of ear prints in forensic investigations. [1] Ear prints are not accepted as reliable evidence in court cases. In court cases, definitions used to define the evidence of ear prints are not completely assertive. Wording such as "there is 'high probability' the ear print was made by the suspect" is used. [2]

Subjectivity

The identification of an ear print matching a suspect's ear mark is based on the assessment by a forensic specialist. The match of an ear print to an ear mark and its value in court is based on the forensic examiners judgement. [11] The use of ear prints in court is not common due to factors such as the subjectivity of value given to a print and the forensic examiner's experience. [11]

Notable cases

Notable cases of ear print identification failing to convict suspects of crime include Mark Dallagher's United Kingdom case from 1998. Dallagher was convicted of murder on the foundation of an ear print. In January 2004, the conviction was dropped due to DNA testing that found his DNA was not a match with the earmark found at the scene. [2]

Future possibilities

Ear print analysis needs further research and scientific method improvement to ensure analysis is reliable and valid. Due to improvements in technology, the future of ear print analysis to be used widely in criminal investigations is possible.

There are still fundamental questions to consider when analysing ear prints. There needs to be a greater understanding of ear print features and factors and how they can improve intraindividual variation. [2]  Ear prints need to resemble the same ear more than it resembles another ear. [8] Subjectivity also has to be accepted when scientific experts analyse ear prints and make conclusions.

Related Research Articles

Voice analysis is the study of speech sounds for purposes other than linguistic content, such as in speech recognition. Such studies include mostly medical analysis of the voice (phoniatrics), but also speaker identification. More controversially, some believe that the truthfulness or emotional state of speakers can be determined using voice stress analysis or layered voice analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA profiling</span> Technique used to identify individuals via DNA characteristics

DNA profiling is the process of determining an individual's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) characteristics. DNA analysis intended to identify a species, rather than an individual, is called DNA barcoding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic science</span> Application of science to criminal and civil laws

Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science principles and methods to support legal decision-making in matters of criminal and civil law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic palynology</span> Forensic application of the study of particulate matter

Forensic palynology is a subdiscipline of palynology, that aims to prove or disprove a relationship among objects, people, and places that may pertain to both criminal and civil cases. Pollen can reveal where a person or object has been, because regions of the world, countries, and even different parts of a single garden will have a distinctive pollen assemblage. Pollen evidence can also reveal the season in which a particular object picked up the pollen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fingerprint</span> Biometric identifier

A fingerprint is an impression left by the friction ridges of a human finger. The recovery of partial fingerprints from a crime scene is an important method of forensic science. Moisture and grease on a finger result in fingerprints on surfaces such as glass or metal. Deliberate impressions of entire fingerprints can be obtained by ink or other substances transferred from the peaks of friction ridges on the skin to a smooth surface such as paper. Fingerprint records normally contain impressions from the pad on the last joint of fingers and thumbs, though fingerprint cards also typically record portions of lower joint areas of the fingers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic dentistry</span> Aspect of criminal investigation

Forensic dentistry or forensic odontology involves the handling, examination, and evaluation of dental evidence in a criminal justice context. Forensic dentistry is used in both criminal and civil law. Forensic dentists assist investigative agencies in identifying human remains, particularly in cases when identifying information is otherwise scarce or nonexistent—for instance, identifying burn victims by consulting the victim's dental records. Forensic dentists may also be asked to assist in determining the age, race, occupation, previous dental history, and socioeconomic status of unidentified human beings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hair analysis</span> Chemical analysis of a hair sample

Hair analysis may refer to the chemical analysis of a hair sample, but can also refer to microscopic analysis or comparison. Chemical hair analysis may be considered for retrospective purposes when blood and urine are no longer expected to contain a particular contaminant, typically three months or less.

Criminal psychology, also referred to as criminological psychology, is the study of the views, thoughts, intentions, actions and reactions of criminals and suspects. It is a subfield of criminology and applied psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-mortem interval</span> Time that has elapsed since a person has died

The post-mortem interval (PMI) is the time that has elapsed since an individual's death. When the time of death is not known, the interval may be estimated, and so an approximate time of death established. Postmortem interval estimations can range from hours, to days or even years depending on the type of evidence present. There are standard medical and scientific techniques supporting such an estimation.

Forensic identification is the application of forensic science, or "forensics", and technology to identify specific objects from the trace evidence they leave, often at a crime scene or the scene of an accident. Forensic means "for the courts".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic chemistry</span> Forensic application of the study of chemistry

Forensic chemistry is the application of chemistry and its subfield, forensic toxicology, in a legal setting. A forensic chemist can assist in the identification of unknown materials found at a crime scene. Specialists in this field have a wide array of methods and instruments to help identify unknown substances. These include high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, atomic absorption spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thin layer chromatography. The range of different methods is important due to the destructive nature of some instruments and the number of possible unknown substances that can be found at a scene. Forensic chemists prefer using nondestructive methods first, to preserve evidence and to determine which destructive methods will produce the best results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bloodstain pattern analysis</span> Forensic method

Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is a controversial subjective practice that consists of the study and analysis of bloodstains at a known or suspected crime scene. This is done with the purpose of drawing inferences about the nature, timing and other details of the crime. It is used mostly to study homicide or other violent crimes in which blood is present and is claimed to help in crime scene reconstruction. Since the late 1950s, BPA experts have claimed to be able to use biology, physics, and mathematical calculations to reconstruct with accuracy events at a crime scene, and these claims have been accepted by the criminal justice system in the US.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic facial reconstruction</span> Recreating faces from skeletal remains

Forensic facial reconstruction is the process of recreating the face of an individual from their skeletal remains through an amalgamation of artistry, anthropology, osteology, and anatomy. It is easily the most subjective—as well as one of the most controversial—techniques in the field of forensic anthropology. Despite this controversy, facial reconstruction has proved successful frequently enough that research and methodological developments continue to be advanced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic biology</span> Forensic application of the study of biology

Forensic biology is the use of biological principles and techniques in the context of law enforcement investigations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Body identification</span> Subfield of forensic science

Body identification is a subfield of forensic science that uses a variety of scientific and non-scientific methods to identify a body. Forensic purposes are served by rigorous scientific forensic identification techniques, but these are generally preceded by formal identification. This involves requesting a family member or friend of the victim to visually identify the body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic profiling</span> Study of trace evidence in criminal investigations

Forensic profiling is the study of trace evidence in order to develop information which can be used by police authorities. This information can be used to identify suspects and convict them in a court of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic podiatry</span>

Forensic podiatry is a subdiscipline of forensic science in which specialized podiatric knowledge including foot and lower-limb anatomy, musculoskeletal function, deformities and diseases of the foot, ankle, lower extremities, and at times, the entire human body is used in the examination of foot-related evidence in the context of a criminal investigation. Forensic Podiatry has been defined as:

The application of sound and researched podiatry knowledge and experience in forensic investigations, to show the association of an individual with a scene of crime, or to answer any other legal question concerned with the foot or footwear that requires knowledge of the functioning foot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glove prints</span> Mark left on a surface by a worn glove

Glove prints, also sometimes described as gloveprints or glove marks, are latent, fingerprint-like impressions that are transferred to a surface or object by an individual who is wearing gloves.

Candice Mae Bridge is an American chemist and Associate Professor of Chemistry and Forensic Science at the University of Central Florida. Her research considers the development of mass spectroscopy for forensic analysis, including the characterization of lubricant from rape victims and residue from gunshots, as well as the identification of drugs in urine samples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic colorimetry</span> Color analysis technique

Forensic colorimetry, or forensic color analysis, is the examination of specimen color for purposes of forensic investigation. Typical specimens involved in color analyses include pigments, dyes, or other objects that are distinguishable by their intrinsic color. Analyses may be conducted by-eye or by computational methods, both by matching specimen colors to a standardised chart or database.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Curiel López de Arcautea, A.M.; Granell Navarro, J. (August 2006). "La huella de oreja como método de identificación" [Ear Print as an Identification Method](PDF). Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española. 57 (7): 329–332. doi:10.1016/S0001-6519(06)78721-0. PMID   17036996.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Meijerman, Lynn; Thean, Andrew; Maat, George (2005). "Earprints in Forensic Investigations". Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology. 1 (4): 247–256. doi:10.1385/fsmp:1:4:247. ISSN   1547-769X. PMID   25868442. S2CID   23720960.
  3. Berbell, Carlos (2005). CSI: casos reales españoles (in Spanish). La Esfera de los Libros. ISBN   9788497343510.
  4. 1 2 Catchpole, Heather (10 March 2004). "Ear prints used to catch a thief". Australian Broadcasting Corporation . Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  5. Van Der Lugt, C.; Nagelkerke, N.J.D.; Maat, G.J.R. (April 2005). "Study of the Relationship between a Person's Stature and the Height of an Ear Imprint from the Floor". Medicine, Science and the Law . 45 (2): 135–141. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.1032.1175 . doi:10.1258/rsmmsl.45.2.135. PMID   15895639. S2CID   28891025.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Alberink, Ivo; Ruifrok, Arnout (2 March 2007). "Performance of the FearID earprint identification system". Forensic Science International . 166 (2–3): 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.001. PMID   16772109.
  7. "Ear Print Analysis". World of Forensic Science. encyclopedia.com. 2005. Retrieved 7 February 2016.
  8. 1 2 3 Meijerman, Lynn; Sholl, Sarah; De Conti, Francesca; Giacon, Marta; van der Lugt, Cor; Drusini, Andrea; Vanezis, Peter; Maat, George (2004). "Exploratory study on classification and individualisation of earprints". Forensic Science International. 140 (1): 91–99. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.10.024. PMID   15013170.
  9. Champod, Christophe; Evett, Ian W.; Kuchler, Benoit (2001-11-01). "Earmarks as Evidence: A Critical Review". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 46 (6): 1275–84. doi:10.1520/JFS15146J. PMID   11714135.
  10. 1 2 3 Swift, Benjamin; Rutty, Guy N. (2003-01-01). "The Human Ear: Its Role in Forensic Practice". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48 (1): 153–60. doi:10.1520/JFS2002251. PMID   12570218.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Junod, Stéphane; Pasquier, Julien; Champod, Christophe (2012). "The development of an automatic recognition system for earmark and earprint comparisons". Forensic Science International. 222 (1–3): 170–178. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.021. PMID   22840281.