Election court

Last updated

In United Kingdom election law, an election court is a special court convened to hear a petition against the result of a local government or parliamentary election. The court is created to hear the individual case, and ceases to exist when it has made its decision.

Contents

Statutory basis

Election courts are governed by the Representation of the People Act 1983. [1] They are overseen by a rota of High Court (in England and Wales) or Court of Session (in Scotland) judges.

The election court is established following the presentation, to the High Court or Court of Session, of an election petition challenging the result of the election. The constitution of the court differs depending on whether the election being challenged is for a seat on a local council or in Parliament. In the case of a parliamentary election, the court comprises two of the High Court or Court of Session judges who are on the rota. [2] [3] In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the judges appoint an experienced barrister as a commissioner to hear the case. [4] [5] In the case of a council election in Scotland, the case is heard by one or more sheriffs principal. [6] The Court sits in the parliamentary constituency, or in the local government area, in question. The election court ceases to exist when the case is concluded. [7]

Procedure

The election court tries the petition without a jury, [8] and has all the powers of the High Court or Court of Session. [2] Witnesses give evidence on oath, and a witness is not excused from answering a question even if the answer would incriminate him, although the answer cannot be used against him in any subsequent criminal proceedings (except in the case of a charge of perjury). [9] The trial itself is preceded by 'the scrutiny' in which the ballot papers are examined by an officer of the court (or, in rare cases, by the court itself) in order to establish a factual basis for the trial. The scrutiny may be attended by the parties and their lawyers, who can make representations to the person carrying out the scrutiny. [10] [11] [ better source needed ]

After the judges trying a petition against the result of a parliamentary election have determined whether the successful candidate was validly elected or not, they issue a certificate of their decision to the Speaker of the House of Commons. [3] If the two judges disagree as to whether the election is valid, the original result of the election stands. [12] In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the commissioner issues a certificate of their decision to the High Court (in Scotland, the commissioner's determination does not need to be certified to the Court of Session). [13]

In either case, if the election court considers that corrupt practices have taken place during the election, it also issues a report (to the Speaker or the High Court, as the case may be) stating whether it finds any candidate in the election guilty, either personally or by his agents, of corrupt practices. [14] The effect of such a report is that the candidate's election is void (if he had been successful originally), [15] and he is prohibited from holding any elected office for five years; in the case of some corrupt practices he may also be prohibited from voting in any election for the same period. [16] [17]

Appeal

There is no appeal from an election court on a question of fact, [18] but questions of law may be reviewed by the High Court or Court of Session by way of judicial review. [19]

Recent cases

Parliamentary

Two election petitions were lodged after the general election on 6 May 2010. The defeated Independent Rodney Connor, who lost in Fermanagh and South Tyrone by four votes, lodged a petition seeking a recount with scrutiny, [20] [21] and the case began on 13 September 2010. [22]

In the Oldham East and Saddleworth constituency, the defeated Liberal Democrat candidate Elwyn Watkins petitioned against the election of Phil Woolas, [23] a former Labour minister, alleging that the result was affected by false statements of fact about his personal character. [24] The election court which heard the case ordered a re-run of the election in Woolas' constituency after finding him guilty of making false statements against his opponent during the original campaign. [25] [26] Phil Woolas sought a judicial review of the decision in the High Court, but was unsuccessful overall as that court upheld the decision of the election court in relation to two statements, whilst quashing the decision in relation to a third. [19]

Local elections

Recent cases in which election courts have ruled on the validity of elections include local government elections:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Justiciary</span> Supreme criminal court in Scotland

The High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court in Scotland. The High Court is both a trial court and a court of appeal. As a trial court, the High Court sits on circuit at Parliament House or in the adjacent former Sheriff Court building in the Old Town in Edinburgh, or in dedicated buildings in Glasgow and Aberdeen. The High Court sometimes sits in various smaller towns in Scotland, where it uses the local sheriff court building. As an appeal court, the High Court sits only in Edinburgh. On one occasion the High Court of Justiciary sat outside Scotland, at Zeist in the Netherlands during the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial, as the Scottish Court in the Netherlands. At Zeist the High Court sat both as a trial court, and an appeal court for the initial appeal by Abdelbaset al-Megrahi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phil Woolas</span> British environmental consultant, political lobbyist and former television producer and politician

Philip James Woolas is a British environmental consultant, political lobbyist and former television producer and politician who served as Minister of State for Borders and Immigration from 2008 to 2010. A member of the Labour Party, he was Member of Parliament (MP) for Oldham East and Saddleworth from 1997 to 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Scotland</span> Administration of justice in Scotland

The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom constituencies</span> Various types of electoral area in the UK

In the United Kingdom (UK), each of the electoral areas or divisions called constituencies elects one member to the House of Commons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wokingham (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom 1885-1918 and from 1950 onwards

Wokingham is a constituency of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, located in the English county of Berkshire. From its creation in 1950 until 2024, it was represented solely by Conservatives, most notably, John Redwood, who held his position from 1987 until 2024 when he stepped down after the dissolution of parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saffron Walden (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885-2024

Saffron Walden was a constituency in Essex, represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament from 1922 to 2024 by members of the Conservative Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manchester Gorton (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885 onwards

Manchester Gorton was a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament. It was the safest Labour seat in Greater Manchester by numerical majority and one of the safest in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oldham East and Saddleworth (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1997 onwards

Oldham East and Saddleworth is a constituency in outer Greater Manchester represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since January 2011 by Debbie Abrahams of the Labour Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wycombe (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885 onwards

Wycombe is a constituency in Buckinghamshire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2024 by Labour's Emma Reynolds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation of the People Act 1983</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Representation of the People Act 1983 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It changed the British electoral process in the following ways:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corrupt practices</span>

Corrupt practices in English election law includes bribery, treating, undue influence, personation, and aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring personation.

An election petition refers to the procedure for challenging the result of a parliamentary election.

Richard Mawrey, KC is a barrister and Deputy High Court Judge in the United Kingdom. He is a bencher of Gray's Inn and a member of Henderson Chambers. In his role as a judge in election cases, he has repeatedly criticised the postal voting system in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hampstead (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Former UK Parliament constituency, 1885–1983

Hampstead was a borough constituency, centered on the Hampstead area of North London. It returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, who was elected using the first-past-the-post voting system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tower Hamlets London Borough Council</span> Local authority in London, England

Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, also known as Tower Hamlets Council, is the local authority for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets in Greater London, England. It is a London borough council, one of 32 in London. The council has been under the majority control of local party Aspire since 2022. It has been led by a directly elected mayor since 2010. The council is based at Tower Hamlets Town Hall on Whitechapel Road.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the United Kingdom</span> Uncodified constitution of the UK

The constitution of the United Kingdom comprises the written and unwritten arrangements that establish the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as a political body. Unlike in most countries, no official attempt has been made to codify such arrangements into a single document, thus it is known as an uncodified constitution. This enables the constitution to be easily changed as no provisions are formally entrenched.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in the United Kingdom</span>

There are five types of elections in the United Kingdom: elections to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elections to devolved parliaments and assemblies, local elections, mayoral elections, and police and crime commissioner elections. Within each of those categories, there may also be by-elections. Elections are held on Election Day, which is conventionally a Thursday, and under the provisions of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 the timing of general elections can be held at the discretion of the prime minister during any five-year period. All other types of elections are held after fixed periods, though early elections to the devolved assemblies and parliaments can occur in certain situations. The five electoral systems used are: the single member plurality system (first-past-the-post), the multi-member plurality, the single transferable vote, the additional member system, and the supplementary vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croydon London Borough Council</span> Municipal body governing London Borough

Croydon London Borough Council, which styles itself Croydon Council, is the local authority for the London Borough of Croydon in Greater London, England. It is a London borough council, one of 32 in London. Croydon is divided into 28 wards, electing 70 councillors. Since 2022 the council has been led by a directly elected mayor. The council has been under no overall control since 2022, being run by a Conservative minority administration. The council meets at Croydon Town Hall and has its main offices in the adjoining Bernard Weatherill House.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Council</span>

Windsor and Maidenhead Borough Council is the local authority for the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, a local government district in Berkshire, England. Since 1998, the council has been a unitary authority, being a district council which also performs the functions of a county council.

<i>Erlam v Rahman</i>

Erlam and others v Rahman and another [2015] EWHC 1215 (QB) is an English election court case challenging the 2014 election of Lutfur Rahman as the Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. On 23 April 2015, Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey voided Rahman's election under the Representation of the People Act 1983 on the grounds of corrupt and illegal practices by him and his agents, and general corruption so extensively prevailing so to reasonably supposed to have affected the election. Rahman's official election agent Alibor Choudhury was ordered to vacate his own office of councillor in the ward of Stepney Green for being guilty of corrupt and illegal practices.

References

  1. "Representation of the People Act 1983", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2
  2. 1 2 "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 123", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2 (s. 123)
  3. 1 2 Bradley, Anthony; Ewing, Keith (2006). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Longman. pp. 169–170.
  4. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 130", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 30 (s. 130)
  5. Pilkington, Colin (1999). The Politics today companion to the British Constitution. Manchester University Press. p. 59.
  6. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 134", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2 (s. 134)
  7. Per Robert Goff LJ in R v Cripps, ex parte Muldoon [1984] 1 QB 68, confirmed by the Court of Appeal in The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner [2010] EWCA Civ 1332 (23 November 2010)
  8. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 139", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2 (s. 139)
  9. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Sections 140–141". legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (ss. 140–141). Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  10. 1 2 "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 157", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2 (s. 157)
  11. "In the matters of Local Government elections for the Bordesley Green and Aston Wards of the Birmingham City Council both held on 10th June 2004". WhatDoTheyKnow . 308–309.
  12. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 144", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 1983 c. 2 (s. 144)
  13. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 145". legislation.gov.uk . The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (s. 145).
  14. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 158". legislation.gov.uk . The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (s. 158).
  15. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 159". legislation.gov.uk . The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (s. 159).
  16. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Section 160". legislation.gov.uk . The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (s. 160).
  17. Barnett, Hilaire (2004). Constitutional & administrative law. Routledge-Cavendish. p. 361.
  18. "Representation of the People Act 1983: Sections 144(1) and 145(1)". legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives. 1983 c. 2 (ss. 144(1), 145(1)). Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  19. 1 2 R (on the application of Woolas) v The Parliamentary Election Court and others [2010] EWHC 3169(Admin) (3 December 2010)
  20. Saunderson, Sarah (3 June 2010). "Connor asks High Court for election recount". The Impartial Reporter.
  21. "Election petition submitted to the High Court of Northern Ireland" (PDF). Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
  22. "Notice of Election Court" (PDF). Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
  23. "Losing candidate challenges Oldham election result". BBC News. 28 May 2010. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
  24. "Election Petition submitted to the High Court" (PDF). Oldham Council. Part 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 30 June 2010. For subsequent parts, see:
  25. "Judges order election re-run in ex-minister's seat". BBC News. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  26. Watkins v Woolas 2010 [2010] EWHC 2702(QB) (5 November 2010)
  27. Court of Appeal decision in re Local government election for the Aberman South Ward of Rhonnda Cynon Taff County Borough Council [1997] EWCA Civ 1512 (24 April 1997)
  28. Aehmed v Afzal & another [2008] EWHC B5(QB) (2 April 2008)
  29. [2008] EWHC B4(QB) (18 March 2008)
  30. The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner & others [2010] EWHC 285(Admin) (19 February 2010)
  31. "Penlington-Pennington Denbighshire vote mix-up reversed". BBC News. 23 January 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
  32. Finnerty, Joe (29 July 2013). "Councillor guilty of voting fraud". Get Surrey. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  33. Syal, Rajeev; Quinn, Ben (23 April 2015). "Met considers criminal inquiry into Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman". The Guardian.