Georges Romme

Last updated
Abel Georges Lodewijk Romme
Born (1960-02-29) February 29, 1960 (age 64)
Nijmegen, Netherlands
NationalityDutch
Occupation(s) Organizational theorist, academic and author
Academic background
EducationBSc., Economics
MSc., Economics
Doctoral degree
Alma mater Tilburg University
Maastricht University

Georges Romme (Dutch: Sjoerd) is a Dutch organizational theorist, academic and author. He is a full professor of Entrepreneurship & Innovation at the Eindhoven University of Technology. [1]

Contents

Romme is known for introducing design science to organization and management studies. [2] [3] [4] He has also pioneered the so-called thesis circle and is a thought leader on topics as professionalism and (organizational) hierarchy. [5] [6] He has authored and co-authored research articles and books, including The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship, for which he received the EURAM Best Book Award [7] and the Responsible Research in Management Award in 2017. [8] He is also the recipient of the 2016 Tjalling C. Koopmans Asset Award from Tilburg University [9] and the 2019 Distinguished Scholar-Practitioner Award from the Academy of Management. [10]

Education and career

Romme earned a BSc degree in Economics in 1981 and a MSc degree in 1984, both from Tilburg University. He worked as an assistant professor in Strategic Management at Maastricht University from 1989 to 1992 and obtained a doctoral degree from Maastricht University in 1992. [1]

Romme continued his academic career at Maastricht University as an associate professor in Strategy & Organization from 1992 to 2000 and a senior research fellow in the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (from 1996 to 2000). Subsequently, he was appointed as a professor of Management at Tilburg University. Since 2005, he has been a professor of Entrepreneurship & Innovation at the Eindhoven University of Technology. [1] [11]

Romme served as the Dean of the Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences (IE & IS) department of Eindhoven University of Technology from 2007 to 2014. Concurrently, he was the chairman of the Supervisory Board of Research School Beta from 2007 to 2014. He also was a member of various advisory boards, such as the Scientific Advisory Board of Aalto University’s School of Science (2011-2020). [12]

Romme also was a co-founder of the EIT InnoEnergy. He serves as the Ambassador for Entrepreneurship at the Eindhoven University of Technology [13] and is also a fellow at the Center for Design Science in Entrepreneurship at the ESCP Business School, Berlin. [14]

Research

The scholarly work of Romme involves three main contributions: his work on the professionalization of the management discipline, design science methodology, and organizational hierarchy and circularity. [5]

Quest for Professionalism

Romme has authored and co-authored several publications exploring the realm and purpose of business and management scholarship. In The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship, which won the 2017 EURAM Best Book Award, [7] he contended that the Quest for Professionalism is essential to mitigate the societal costs of managerial amateurism, by focusing on the development of a shared professional purpose and knowledge base, with an emphasis on the transformative role of management scholarship. Jan Spruijt wrote about this book that it "is a one-of-a-kind taking a much needed reflective approach to leadership and a critical note towards the level of professionalism that many of us are approaching the science of management and entrepreneurship with." [15]

Design science

Romme's publications on design science have focused on developing and applying a research methodology that solves the rigor-relevance gap in organization and management research, inspired by Herbert Simon's The Sciences of the Artificial . Here, Romme advocated for the adoption of the design approach as a primary research mode (alongside the social sciences and humanities as prevailing modes) in the field of management, emphasizing the role of ideal targets, design principles, and (testing) practical solutions to address the persistent gap between theory and practice. [16] With Dimo Dimov, Romme explored various ways to apply design science, distinguishing between developing a "theory of" empirical phenomena and a "theory for" generating them. [17]

In many joint publications, Romme applied design science to develop and test solutions for major problems and challenges. Examples are design principles and various best practices for creating university spin-offs; [18] a tool for mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems; [19] a tool that facilitates value crafting; [20] a practical approach to enhance citizen participation in a local democracy; [21] a software tool for partner search in open innovation settings; [22] design principles for sustainability assessment in business model innovation; [23] a method for controlling the work of civil servants; [24] and the blueprint of a deep-tech venture builder. [25]

Organizational hierarchy and circularity

Romme analyzed organizational structure and hierarchy. [26] [27] In his early work in this area, he collaborated with Gerard Endenburg to codify Sociocracy as a novel organizational form based on the circular flow of power, [28] [29] which later also informed the development of Holacracy. [30] In a study coauthored with Arjen van Witteloostuijn, Romme examined the role of triple loop learning in the emerging sociocratic (or circular) organization design, finding that this design facilitates single and double loop learning and acts as an infrastructure for triple loop learning, enabling well-informed choices about shared objectives and policies. [31] In more recent work, Romme categorized the hierarchy phenomenon into four types—that is, hierarchy based on formal authority, achieved status, self-organized responsibility, and ideology—each involving a distinct social mechanism, thereby offering a typology for understanding hierarchy in complex social systems. [32]

Awards and honors

Bibliography

Selected books

Selected articles

Related Research Articles

The Eindhoven University of Technology, abbr. TU/e, is a public technical university in the Netherlands, situated in Eindhoven. In 2020–21, around 14,000 students were enrolled in its BSc and MSc programs and around 1350 students were enrolled in its PhD and EngD programs. In 2021, the TU/e employed around 3900 people.

A hierarchical organization or hierarchical organisation is an organizational structure where every entity in the organization, except one, is subordinate to a single other entity. This arrangement is a form of hierarchy. In an organization, this hierarchy usually consists of a singular/group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them. This is the dominant mode of organization among large organizations; most corporations, governments, criminal enterprises, and organized religions are hierarchical organizations with different levels of management power or authority. For example, the broad, top-level overview of the hierarchy of the Catholic Church consists of the Pope, then the Cardinals, then the Archbishops, and so on. Another example is the hierarchy between the four castes in the Hindu caste system, which arises from the religious belief "that each is derived from a different part of the creator God’s (Brahma) body, descending from the head downwards."

Organizational learning is the process of creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge within an organization. An organization improves over time as it gains experience. From this experience, it is able to create knowledge. This knowledge is broad, covering any topic that could better an organization. Examples may include ways to increase production efficiency or to develop beneficial investor relations. Knowledge is created at four different units: individual, group, organizational, and inter organizational.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wanda Orlikowski</span> American computer scientist

Wanda J. Orlikowski is a US-based organizational theorist and Information Systems researcher, and the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Information Technologies and Organization Studies at the MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Sociocracy is a theory of governance that seeks to create psychologically safe environments and productive organizations. It draws on the use of consent, rather than majority voting, in discussion and decision-making by people who have a shared goal or work process.

A collaborative innovation network (CoIN) is a collaborative innovation practice that uses internet platforms to promote communication and innovation within self-organizing virtual teams.

Computer simulation is a prominent method in organizational studies and strategic management. While there are many uses for computer simulation, most academics in the fields of strategic management and organizational studies have used computer simulation to understand how organizations or firms operate. More recently, however, researchers have also started to apply computer simulation to understand organizational behaviour at a more micro-level, focusing on individual and interpersonal cognition and behavior such as team working.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Entrepreneurship</span> Taking financial risks in the hope of profit

Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of economic value in ways that generally entail beyond the minimal amount of risk, and potentially involving values besides simply economic ones.

Innovation management is a combination of the management of innovation processes, and change management. It refers to product, business process, marketing and organizational innovation. Innovation management is the subject of ISO 56000 series standards being developed by ISO TC 279.

Paul M. Leonardi was the Duca Family Professor of Technology Management at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He was also the Investment Group of Santa Barbara Founding Director of the Master of Technology Management Program. Leonardi moved to UCSB to found the Technology Management Program and start its Master of Technology Management and Ph.D. programs. Before joining UCSB, Leonardi was a faculty member in the School of Communication, the McCormick School of Engineering, and the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soumodip Sarkar</span> Economist and Management Scholar

Soumodip Sarkar is an economist and management scholar.

A thesis circle involves a number of students and at least one professor, lecturer or instructor who collaborate in supervising and coaching final projects. This tool for supervising students working on their thesis, also known as "thesis rings", was developed in the 1990s at Maastricht University.

Communities that support innovation have been referred to as communities of innovation (CoI), communities for innovation, innovation communities, open innovation communities, and communities of creation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shaker Zahra</span>

Shaker A. Zahra is the Robert E. Buuck Chair of Entrepreneurship and professor of strategy and entrepreneurship, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. He is also the academic director of the Gary S. Holmes Entrepreneurship Center.

Open collaboration refers to any "system of innovation or production that relies on goal-oriented yet loosely coordinated participants who cooperate voluntarily to create a product of economic value, which is made freely available to contributors and noncontributors alike." It is prominently observed in open source software, and has been initially described in Richard Stallman's GNU Manifesto, as well as Eric S. Raymond's 1997 essay, The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Beyond open source software, open collaboration is also applied to the development of other types of mind or creative works, such as information provision in Internet forums, or the production of encyclopedic content in Wikipedia.

Resource slack, in the business and management literature, is the level of availability of a resource. Resource slack can be considered as the opposite of resource scarcity or resource constraints.

Linus Dahlander is an innovation researcher specializing in crowdsourcing, open innovation, and online communities. He is a professor at the European School of Management and Technology and holds the Lufthansa Group Chair in Innovation. He also served as Associate Editor of the Academy of Management Journal.

Linda Argote is an American academic specializing in industrial and organizational psychology. She is Thomas Lord Professor of Organizational Behavior and Theory in the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, where she directs the Center of Organizational Learning, Innovation and Knowledge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marc Gruber</span> German management researcher

Marc Gruber is a management scholar and researcher specializing in technology commercialization. He is a professor at EPFL, and holds the Chair of Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization at EPFL's College of Management of Technology. In 2022, he was made Chief Editor of the Academy of Management Journal. In 2016, he has been named among the five most influential researchers worldwide in entrepreneurship research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hart E. Posen</span> Canadian academic

Hart E. Posen is an academic, researcher, and business analyst. He is a Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College, Tuck School of Business.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Sjoerd Romme". www.tue.nl.
  2. ↑ Bate, Paul (March 2007). "Bringing the Design Sciences to Organization Development and Change Management: Introduction to the Special Issue". The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 43 (1): 8–11. doi:10.1177/0021886307299885.
  3. ↑ Bartunek, Jean M (May 2008). "You're an organization development practitioner-scholar: Can you contribute to organizational theory?". Organization Management Journal. 5 (1): 6–16. doi:10.1057/omj.2008.3.
  4. ↑ Hodgkinson, Gerard P.; Rousseau, Denise M. (May 2009). "Bridging the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening!". Journal of Management Studies. 46 (3): 534–546. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00832.x.
  5. 1 2 "Georges (Sjoerd) Romme". scholar.google.com.
  6. ↑ "Profielen". scholar.google.nl.
  7. 1 2 3 Bianchi, Marco. "Best Book Award". EURAM.
  8. 1 2 "2018 IACMR Presidential Award".
  9. 1 2 "2016 Tjalling C. Koopmans Asset Award". Eindhoven University of Technology research portal.
  10. 1 2 "2019 Career Achievement Awards". AOM_CMS.
  11. ↑ "A.G.L. (Sjoerd) Romme".
  12. ↑ "Scientific Advisory Board | Aalto University". www.aalto.fi. September 18, 2018.
  13. ↑ "TU/e's driver of entrepreneurship - tue.nl/stories". www.tue.nl.
  14. ↑ "About us | ESCP Design Science Center". DS:E.
  15. ↑ "Clarifying Design in Business Sciences: a Design Thinking Taxonomy – Open Innovation". September 25, 2017.
  16. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L. (October 2003). "Making a Difference: Organization as Design". Organization Science. 14 (5): 558–573. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769.[ non-primary source needed ]
  17. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; Dimov, Dimo (22 February 2021). "Mixing Oil with Water: Framing and Theorizing in Management Research Informed by Design Science". Designs. 5 (1): 13. doi: 10.3390/designs5010013 .[ non-primary source needed ]
  18. ↑ Van Burg, Elco; Romme, A. Georges L.; Gilsing, Victor A.; Reymen, Isabelle M. M. J. (March 2008). "Creating University Spin-Offs: A Science-Based Design Perspective". Journal of Product Innovation Management. 25 (2): 114–128. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00291.x.[ non-primary source needed ]
  19. ↑ Talmar, Madis; Walrave, Bob; Podoynitsyna, Ksenia S.; Holmström, Jan; Romme, A. Georges L. (August 2020). "Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model". Long Range Planning. 53 (4): 101850. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002.[ non-primary source needed ]
  20. ↑ Holloway, Sjana S.; van Eijnatten, Frans M.; Romme, A.Georges.L.; Demerouti, Eva (May 2016). "Developing actionable knowledge on value crafting: A design science approach" (PDF). Journal of Business Research. 69 (5): 1639–1643. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.031.[ non-primary source needed ]
  21. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; Broekgaarden, Jan; Huijzer, Carien; Reijmer, Annewiek; van der Eyden, Rob A. I. (17 February 2018). "From Competition and Collusion to Consent-Based Collaboration: A Case Study of Local Democracy". International Journal of Public Administration. 41 (3): 246–255. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1263206.[ non-primary source needed ]
  22. ↑ Meulman, Freek; Reymen, Isabelle M. M. J.; Podoynitsyna, Ksenia S.; L. Romme, A. Georges (February 2018). "Searching for Partners in Open Innovation Settings: How to Overcome the Constraints of Local Search". California Management Review. 60 (2): 71–97. doi:10.1177/0008125617745087.
  23. ↑ Bhatnagar, Rishi; Keskin, Duygu; Kirkels, Arjan; Romme, A. Georges L.; Huijben, J.C.C.M. (December 2022). "Design principles for sustainability assessments in the business model innovation process". Journal of Cleaner Production. 377: 134313. Bibcode:2022JCPro.37734313B. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134313.[ non-primary source needed ]
  24. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; van de Loo, Harry; Dankbaar, Ben (27 April 2022). "How to Control Civil Servants: Designing and Testing a Solution Informed by Game Theory". Administrative Sciences. 12 (2): 53. doi: 10.3390/admsci12020053 . hdl: 2066/251725 .[ non-primary source needed ]
  25. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; Bell, John; Frericks, Guus (10 May 2023). "Designing a deep-tech venture builder to address grand challenges and overcome the valley of death". Journal of Organization Design. 12 (4): 217–237. doi: 10.1007/s41469-023-00144-y .[ non-primary source needed ]
  26. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L. (May 1996). "A note on the hierarchy-team debate". Strategic Management Journal. 17 (5): 411–417. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199605)17:5<411::AID-SMJ809>3.0.CO;2-O.[ non-primary source needed ]
  27. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L. (December 2019). "Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design". Journal of Organization Design. 8 (1). doi: 10.1186/s41469-019-0060-y .[ non-primary source needed ]
  28. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L. (September 1999). "Domination, Self-Determination and Circular Organizing". Organization Studies. 20 (5): 801–832. doi:10.1177/0170840699205005.[ non-primary source needed ]
  29. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; Endenburg, Gerard (April 2006). "Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design". Organization Science. 17 (2): 287–297. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0169.[ non-primary source needed ]
  30. ↑ Romme, Georges (September 10, 2015). "The Big Misconceptions Holding Holacracy Back". Harvard Business Review– via hbr.org.[ non-primary source needed ]
  31. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L.; van Witteloostuijn, Arjen (October 1999). "Circular organizing and triple loop learning". Journal of Organizational Change Management. 12 (5): 439–454. doi:10.1108/09534819910289110.[ non-primary source needed ]
  32. ↑ Romme, A. Georges L. (15 March 2021). "Ladders of Authority, Status, Responsibility and Ideology: Toward a Typology of Hierarchy in Social Systems". Systems. 9 (1): 20. doi: 10.3390/systems9010020 .[ non-primary source needed ]
  33. ↑ "Recognitions - - Maastricht University". www.maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  34. ↑ "TU/e honorary medal". Eindhoven University of Technology research portal.
  35. ↑ "Jam-packed Philips Museum embraces winners of the eighth Gerard & Anton High Tech Peak Awards". 9 January 2025.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.