The Sciences of the Artificial

Last updated
The Sciences of the Artificial
The Sciences of the Artificial book cover.jpg
Author Herbert A. Simon
Subjectsscience, philosophy
Genresnon-fiction
Published1969 (hbk); 1970 (pbk)
PublisherThe MIT Press
ISBN 9780262190510

The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) [1] is a book by Herbert A. Simon in the domain of the learning sciences and artificial intelligence; it is especially influential in design theory. [2] The book is themed around how artificial phenomena ought to be categorized, discussing as to whether such phenomena belong within the domain of 'science'. [3]

Contents

It has been reviewed many times in scientific literature [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] —including as a special column in The Journal of the Learning Sciences . [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]

The book was followed by two later editions—in 1981 and in 1996 [1] —in which Simon broadened the scope of his discussions. [2]

Background

During the 1950s and 1960s, an expanse of literature was published that demonstrated broad interest in treating design as a rigorous and systematic discipline in hopes of establishing design as a science. Primarily through the fields of operational research and Organisation & Methods, these academics purposed to make design compatible with the related disciplines of management science and operations management. [2]

This trend would bring about the “design methods movement" of the 1960s, [2] serving as the backdrop under which Simon wrote the article "Architecture of Complexity" (1962), which would later become The Sciences of the Artificial (1969). [9] [10] In his work, Simon had the broader intention of unifying the social sciences. [2]

Overview

The theme of the book is how ought artificial phenomena be categorized, discussing as to whether such phenomena belong within the domain of 'science'. [3]

Intending to demonstrate that it is possible for there to be an empirical science of 'artificial' phenomena in addition to that of 'natural' phenomena, Simon argues that designed systems are a valid field of study. The distinction Simon provides between the 'artificial' and the 'natural' is that artificial things are synthetic, and characterized in terms of functions, goals, and adaptation. [3] [14]

Simon characterizes an artificial system as an interface that links two environments—inner and outer. Therefore, artificial systems are susceptible to change because they are contingent upon their environment, i.e. the circumstances in which they are in. Moreover, these environments exist in the realm of 'natural science', while the interface is the realm of 'artificial science'. [14]

To Simon, science of the 'artificial' is the science of 'design'; the sciences of the artificial are relevant to "all fields that create designs to perform tasks or fulfill goals and functions." [14] Moreover:

Engineering, medicine, business, architecture, and painting are concerned not with the necessary but with the contingent -- not with how things are but with how they might be -- in short, with design. [15] :xi

Such fields also include those of cognitive psychology, linguistics, economics, management/administration, and education. As such, Simon explores the commonalities of artificial systems including economic systems, business firms, artificial intelligence, complex engineering projects, and social plans. [14]

The book ultimately provides an information-processing theory of humanity's thinking processes as an operational, empirically based alternative to behaviorism. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive science</span> Interdisciplinary scientific study of cognitive processes

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary, scientific study of the mind and its processes with input from linguistics, psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, computer science/artificial intelligence, and anthropology. It examines the nature, the tasks, and the functions of cognition. Cognitive scientists study intelligence and behavior, with a focus on how nervous systems represent, process, and transform information. Mental faculties of concern to cognitive scientists include language, perception, memory, attention, reasoning, and emotion; to understand these faculties, cognitive scientists borrow from fields such as linguistics, psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, neuroscience, and anthropology. The typical analysis of cognitive science spans many levels of organization, from learning and decision to logic and planning; from neural circuitry to modular brain organization. One of the fundamental concepts of cognitive science is that "thinking can best be understood in terms of representational structures in the mind and computational procedures that operate on those structures."

Cognitive psychology is the scientific study of mental processes such as attention, language use, memory, perception, problem solving, creativity, and reasoning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert A. Simon</span> American political scientist, economist, sociologist, and psychologist

Herbert Alexander Simon was an American political scientist whose work also influenced the fields of computer science, economics, and cognitive psychology. His primary research interest was decision-making within organizations and he is best known for the theories of "bounded rationality" and "satisficing". He received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1978 and the Turing Award in computer science in 1975. His research was noted for its interdisciplinary nature and spanned across the fields of cognitive science, computer science, public administration, management, and political science. He was at Carnegie Mellon University for most of his career, from 1949 to 2001, where he helped found the Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science, one of the first such departments in the world.

Bounded rationality is the idea that rationality is limited when individuals make decisions, and under these limitations, rational individuals will select a decision that is satisfactory rather than optimal.

Artificial consciousness (AC), also known as machine consciousness (MC), synthetic consciousness or digital consciousness, is the consciousness hypothesized to be possible in artificial intelligence. It is also the corresponding field of study, which draws insights from philosophy of mind, philosophy of artificial intelligence, cognitive science and neuroscience. The same terminology can be used with the term "sentience" instead of "consciousness" when specifically designating phenomenal consciousness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Connectionism</span> Cognitive science approach

Connectionism is the name of an approach to the study of human mental processes and cognition that utilizes mathematical models known as connectionist networks or artificial neural networks. Connectionism has had many 'waves' since its beginnings.

Intelligence has been defined in many ways: the capacity for abstraction, logic, understanding, self-awareness, learning, emotional knowledge, reasoning, planning, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving. It can be described as the ability to perceive or infer information; and to retain it as knowledge to be applied to adaptive behaviors within an environment or context.

Situated cognition is a theory that posits that knowing is inseparable from doing by arguing that all knowledge is situated in activity bound to social, cultural and physical contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Problem solving</span> Approaches to problem solving

Problem solving is the process of achieving a goal by overcoming obstacles, a frequent part of most activities. Problems in need of solutions range from simple personal tasks to complex issues in business and technical fields. The former is an example of simple problem solving (SPS) addressing one issue, whereas the latter is complex problem solving (CPS) with multiple interrelated obstacles. Another classification of problem-solving tasks is into well-defined problems with specific obstacles and goals, and ill-defined problems in which the current situation is troublesome but it is not clear what kind of resolution to aim for. Similarly, one may distinguish formal or fact-based problems requiring psychometric intelligence, versus socio-emotional problems which depend on the changeable emotions of individuals or groups, such as tactful behavior, fashion, or gift choices.

In cognitive psychology, cognitive load refers to the amount of working memory resources used. However, it is essential to distinguish it from the actual construct of Cognitive Load (CL) or Mental Workload (MWL), which is studied widely in many disciplines. According to work conducted in the field of instructional design and pedagogy, broadly, there are three types of cognitive load: intrinsic cognitive load is the effort associated with a specific topic; extraneous cognitive load refers to the way information or tasks are presented to a learner; and germane cognitive load refers to the work put into creating a permanent store of knowledge. However, over the years, the additivity of these types of cognitive load has been investigated and questioned. Now it is believed that they circularly influence each other.

Computational cognition is the study of the computational basis of learning and inference by mathematical modeling, computer simulation, and behavioral experiments. In psychology, it is an approach which develops computational models based on experimental results. It seeks to understand the basis behind the human method of processing of information. Early on computational cognitive scientists sought to bring back and create a scientific form of Brentano's psychology.

Mathematical psychology is an approach to psychological research that is based on mathematical modeling of perceptual, thought, cognitive and motor processes, and on the establishment of law-like rules that relate quantifiable stimulus characteristics with quantifiable behavior. The mathematical approach is used with the goal of deriving hypotheses that are more exact and thus yield stricter empirical validations. There are five major research areas in mathematical psychology: learning and memory, perception and psychophysics, choice and decision-making, language and thinking, and measurement and scaling.

John Sweller is an Australian educational psychologist who is best known for formulating an influential theory of cognitive load. He is currently Professor Emeritus at the University of New South Wales.

CHREST is a symbolic cognitive architecture based on the concepts of limited attention, limited short-term memories, and chunking. The architecture takes into low-level aspects of cognition such as reference perception, long and short-term memory stores, and methodology of problem-solving and high-level aspects such as the use of strategies. Learning, which is essential in the architecture, is modelled as the development of a network of nodes (chunks) which are connected in various ways. This can be contrasted with Soar and ACT-R, two other cognitive architectures, which use productions for representing knowledge. CHREST has often been used to model learning using large corpora of stimuli representative of the domain, such as chess games for the simulation of chess expertise or child-directed speech for the simulation of children's development of language. In this respect, the simulations carried out with CHREST have a flavour closer to those carried out with connectionist models than with traditional symbolic models.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gary Marcus</span> American cognitive scientist

Gary Fred Marcus is an American psychologist, cognitive scientist, and author, known for his research on the intersection of cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence (AI).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collective intelligence</span> Group intelligence that emerges from collective efforts

Collective intelligence (CI) is shared or group intelligence (GI) that emerges from the collaboration, collective efforts, and competition of many individuals and appears in consensus decision making. The term appears in sociobiology, political science and in context of mass peer review and crowdsourcing applications. It may involve consensus, social capital and formalisms such as voting systems, social media and other means of quantifying mass activity. Collective IQ is a measure of collective intelligence, although it is often used interchangeably with the term collective intelligence. Collective intelligence has also been attributed to bacteria and animals.

Allan M. Collins is an American cognitive scientist, Professor Emeritus of Learning Sciences at Northwestern University's School of Education and Social Policy. His research is recognized as having broad impact on the fields of cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embodied cognition</span> Interdisciplinary theory

Embodied cognition is the concept suggesting that many features of cognition are shaped by the state and capacities of the organism. The cognitive features include a wide spectrum of cognitive functions, such as perception biases, memory recall, comprehension and high-level mental constructs and performance on various cognitive tasks. The bodily aspects involve the motor system, the perceptual system, the bodily interactions with the environment (situatedness), and the assumptions about the world built the functional structure of organism's brain and body.

In the philosophy of artificial intelligence, GOFAI is classical symbolic AI, as opposed to other approaches, such as neural networks, situated robotics, narrow symbolic AI or neuro-symbolic AI. The term was coined by philosopher John Haugeland in his 1985 book Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea.

Michelene (Micki) T. H. Chi is a cognitive and learning scientist known for her work on the development of expertise, benefits of self-explanations, and active learning in the classroom. Chi is the Regents Professor, Dorothy Bray Endowed Professor of Science and Teaching at Arizona State University, where she directs the Learning and Cognition Lab.

References

  1. 1 2 Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN   9780262193740.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Xinya You and David Hands. 2019. "A Reflection upon Herbert Simon’s Vision of Design in 'The Sciences of the Artificial'." The Design Journal 22(sup1):1345-56. doi : 10.1080/14606925.2019.1594961.
  3. 1 2 3 Dawson, Michael R. W. n.d. "Notes on 'The Sciences of the Artificial'." Cognitive Science at the University of Alberta.
  4. Arbib, M. (1970). "Review of 'The Sciences of the Artificial' (Simon, H. A.; 1969)". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 16 (6): 803–804. doi:10.1109/tit.1970.1054543. ISSN   0018-9448.
  5. Edwards, Keith J. (1971). "Book Review : Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1969, 123 pp". Simulation & Games. 2 (1): 89–92. doi: 10.1177/104687817100200105 . ISSN   0037-5500. S2CID   59229857.
  6. Komoski, P. Kenneth (1972). "Review of The Sciences of the Artificial". AV Communication Review. 20 (4): 459–463. JSTOR   30217713.
  7. Charness, Neil (1982). "How artificial is psychology?". Canadian Journal of Psychology. 36 (3): 537–539. doi:10.1037/h0080902. ISSN   0008-4255.
  8. Stefik, Mark (1984). "The sciences of the artificial". Artificial Intelligence. 22 (1): 95–97. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(84)90029-8. ISSN   0004-3702.
  9. 1 2 Koschmann, Timothy (2003). "Sciences of the Artificial: A Retro-Review". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 409–411. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_3. JSTOR   1466923. S2CID   62772723.
  10. 1 2 Agre, Philip E. (2003). "Hierarchy and History in Simon's "Architecture of Complexity" - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 413–426. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_4. JSTOR   1466924. S2CID   62539315.
  11. Shaw, Robert; Shockley, Kevin (2003). "An Ecological Science of the Artificial? - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_5. JSTOR   1466925. S2CID   62232753.
  12. Coulter, Jeff (2003). "Projection Errors and Cognitive Models - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_6. JSTOR   1466926. S2CID   62715930.
  13. Eisenberg, Mike (2003). "A Classic Problem - Review of Herbert A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial". The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12 (3): 445–450. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_7. JSTOR   1466927. S2CID   62582050.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 "The Sciences of the Artificial, Third Edition". The MIT Press. Retrieved 2021-03-15.
  15. Simon, Herbert A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial.