Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership

Last updated
Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership
Type Intergovernmental organisation
Focus Sanitation, hygiene, water supply
Location
  • Washington, D. C., United States of America
Area served
Worldwide, with particular focus on Africa, South Asia, and Latin America
Key people
Jyoti Shukla, Senior Manager
Website wsp.org www.worldbank.org/en/programs/global-water-security-sanitation-partnership

The Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership (GWSP), formerly the Water and Sanitation Program, is a trust fund administered by the World Bank geared at improving the accessibility and infrastructure of water and sanitation for underdeveloped countries. GWSP works in more than 25 countries through regional offices in Africa, East and South Asia, Latin America, the Caribbean, and an office in Washington, D.C. [1] Heath P. Tarbert is the Acting Executive Director for the United States. [2] The GWSP is best known for its work providing technical assistance, building partnerships and capacity building. GWSP focuses on both regulatory and structural changes and also behavior change projects, such as a scaling up handwashing project and scaling up sanitation project. Another key aspect of GWSP's work is sharing knowledge and best practices through multiple channels. The GWSP has determined five main focus areas: Sustainability, inclusion, institutions, financing, and resilience. [3]

Contents

Activities

In addition to other field projects, the program published 108 field notes and technical briefs in 2016. During this year, just under $40 billion US dollars was distributed worldwide, mostly in Africa. [4] The program divides its efforts between the development of sanitation infrastructure and supplies and researching issues impacting the well-being of the communities lacking such facilities. [1]

Countries affected

Africa

CountryProject OverviewProjected Cost (USD)
Benin
  • Reduce network losses by putting a rehabilitation program and preventative maintenance schedule in place
  • Direct new finance towards the most poorly-covered areas (Ouémé, Atlantique, and Borgou) to reduce geographical disparities
  • Secure employment conditions and further train employees working in sanitation [5]
$40mil/year
Ethiopia
  • Ending open defecation and improving facilities in public sectors and households
  • Improved access to clean water
  • Develop programs to encourage proper disposal of waste and to encourage handwashing [6]
$633.5K/year
Kenya
  • Develop and implement a database to monitor coverage/functionality of rural water supply systems
  • Invest in low-cost sewerage options including small-bore sewerage and decentralized treatment plants
  • Raise funds for storage/transmission of water to cope with demand and expected population growth [7]
$487mil/year
Madagascar
  • Improve fecal disposal
  • Improve facilities in public sectors and households
  • Expand sustainable and cost-effective access to water and sanitation [8]
$17.3mil
Niger
  • Develop financing strategy within the sanitation and hygiene subsector
  • Improve facilities in public sectors and households
  • Develop programs to encourage proper disposal of waste and to encourage handwashing [9]
$40mil/year
Senegal
  • Secure more water resources to supply Dakar
  • Improve the reliability and forecasting of funding allocated by the government from its own budget
  • Set up a licensing system for entities providing pit emptying services
  • Improve public and household facilities [10]
$65mil/year
Tanzania
  • Bring household surveys in line with international best practice on sanitation
  • Revisit policy of only using public funds for sewerage expansion in favor a pro-poor approach [11]
125mil/year

East Asia and the Pacific

Latin America

Other Focus Areas

Ending open defecation

The program has devoted much of its influence to ending open defecation (OD) which affects 1 billion people worldwide and ultimately leading to an estimated 842,000 deaths annually. As part of the RWSP, the WSP began extensive collecting of data in several countries to explore the factors contributing to open defecation in rural areas. [12] The main methodology they have developed is dubbed the SaniFOAM framework. It is focused on identifying the specific practices or attitudes that need to be improved within a community and then finding solutions to influence them to ultimately end open defecation. [13]

Rural Water and Sanitation Project (RWSP)

The Water and Sanitation Program focused mostly on metropolitan areas. The Rural Water and Sanitation Project focuses mainly on the rural areas that don't have access to the materials that the metropolitan areas do. The RWSP expands the water and sewage infrastructure in areas that only have it in a small part of the country. [14] The project utilizes techniques to shift behavioral habits and sanitation marketing to create a demand for products and services to improve water quality. Beginning in 2006 it was implemented India, Indonesia, and Tanzania. It has now spread to over a dozen countries. [12]

Water Partnership Program (WPP)

The Water Partnership Program focuses on agricultural use of water. WPP recognizes that 70% of the freshwater is being used for agricultural usage. The WPP is researching into agriculture, and taking steps to preserve fresh water from being exploited for growing crops. [15]

Methodology

Sustainability

The GWSP has stated that their goal is to promote and help fund private sector initiatives in countries with limited access to water. The reasoning of the GWSP behind promoting development in the private sector is that they claim private water suppliers are able to provide better access with less cost, and that the public sector lacks the resources to improve the access to water. [16] However, there have been criticisms made about the practice of water privatization in developing nations. Some criticisms include how, for the sake of increasing profit for water corporations, these private water suppliers do not do an adequate job of developing infrastructure, and once programs to aid development end, many lower-income households are left without access to inexpensive water. [17]

The GWSP takes steps to ensure the sustainability of water.

Inclusion

The GWSP includes everyone and makes sure not to discriminate anyone from water. [18]

Institutions

There are set rules that institutes make. GWSP tries to figure out the rules to expand its services. [18]

Financing

An estimate of US$114 billion per year until 2030 has been made. To reach that goal, the GWSP is taking steps balancing sources of income, making water affordable, and keeping the viability of water is kept up. [18]

Resilience

Extreme weather, and climate change will effect how the GWSP runs. The steps taken to help slow down the shock is to build buildings that are more resilient to temperature change while still providing water. [18]

History

In an effort to improve upon water and sanitation technology for impoverished nations, the World Bank and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) founded the program in 1978. [19]

The program and its for bearer UNDP invested most of its efforts to testing cost-effective technologies such as hand pumps and latrines for future implementation in the 1980s. However, as other world governments and organizations began developing systemic solutions and strategies to approach issues regarding safe water and sanitation, the program followed suit in widening its scope of impact. [19]

Beginning in the early 1990s the World Bank Water and Sanitation Program worked on sustainable solutions for communities to provide water for themselves. Their main objectives were to create systems that could stay in operation and help the communities be independent. By the end of the decade the program divided its efforts into both field projects and research and evaluation of the world's water systems and practices. [19]

Donors

The program is funded by several countries including Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States, as well as by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Latin America</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Latin America is characterized by insufficient access and in many cases by poor service quality, with detrimental impacts on public health. Water and sanitation services are provided by a vast array of mostly local service providers under an often fragmented policy and regulatory framework. Financing of water and sanitation remains a serious challenge.

Drinking water supply and sanitation coverage in Honduras has increased significantly in the last decades. However, the sector is still characterized by poor service quality and poor efficiency in many places. Coverage gaps still remain, particularly in rural areas.

Drinking water and sanitation in Nicaragua are provided by a national public utility in urban areas and water committees in rural areas. Despite relatively high levels of investment, access to drinking water in urban areas has barely kept up with population growth, access to urban sanitation has actually declined and service quality remains poor. However, a substantial increase in access to water supply and sanitation has been reached in rural areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Argentina</span>

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Argentina is characterized by relatively low tariffs, mostly reasonable service quality, low levels of metering and high levels of consumption for those with access to services. At the same time, according to the WHO, 21% of the total population remains without access to house connections and 52% of the urban population do not have access to sewerage. The responsibility for operating and maintaining water and sanitation services rests with 19 provincial water and sewer companies, more than 100 municipalities and more than 950 cooperatives, the latter operating primarily in small towns. Among the largest water and sewer companies are Agua y Saneamientos Argentinos (AYSA) and Aguas Bonarenses S.A. (ABSA), both operating in Greater Buenos Aires, Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe, and Aguas Cordobesas SA, all of them now publicly owned. In 2008 there were still a few private concessions, such as Aguas de Salta SA, which is majority-owned by Argentine investors, and Obras Sanitarias de Mendoza (OSM).

Haiti faces key challenges in the water supply and sanitation sector: Notably, access to public services is very low, their quality is inadequate and public institutions remain very weak despite foreign aid and the government's declared intent to strengthen the sector's institutions. Foreign and Haitian NGOs play an important role in the sector, especially in rural and urban slum areas.

The water and sanitation sector in Peru has made important advances in the last two decades, including the increase of water coverage from 30% to 85% between 1980 and 2010. Sanitation coverage has also increased from 9% to 37% from 1985 to 2010 in rural areas. Advances have also been achieved concerning the disinfection of drinking water and in sewage treatment. Nevertheless, many challenges remain, such as:

Water supply and sanitation in Indonesia is characterized by poor levels of access and service quality. More than 16 million people lack access to an at least basic water source and almost 33 million of the country's 275 million population has no access to at least basic sanitation. Only about 2% of people have access to sewerage in urban areas; this is one of the lowest in the world among middle-income countries. Water pollution is widespread on Bali and Java. Women in Jakarta report spending US$11 per month on boiling water, implying a significant burden for the poor.

In 2020, 97.7% of Indians had access to the basic water and sanitation facilities. India faces challenges ranging from sourcing water for its megacities to its distribution network which is intermittent in rural areas with continuous distribution networks just beginning to emerge. Non-revenue water is a challenge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Ghana</span> Drinking water supply and sanitation in Ghana

The water supply and sanitation sector in Ghana is a sector that is in charge of the supply of healthy water and also improves the sanitation of water bodies in the country.

The Philippines' water supply system dates back to 1946, after the country declared independence. Government agencies, local institutions, non-government organizations, and other corporations are primarily in charge of the operation and administration of water supply and sanitation in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Uganda</span>

The Ugandan water supply and sanitation sector made substantial progress in urban areas from the mid-1990s until at least 2006, with substantial increases in coverage as well as in operational and commercial performance. Sector reforms from 1998 to 2003 included the commercialization and modernization of the National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC) operating in cities and larger towns, as well as decentralization and private sector participation in small towns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Benin</span>

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Benin has been subject to considerable progress since the 1990s, in particular in rural areas, where coverage is higher than in many other African countries, and almost all development partners follow a national demand-responsive strategy, which has been adopted in 1992. New strategies to increase water supply in rural and urban areas have been adopted in 2005 and 2006. Tariffs in urban and rural areas are usually high enough to cover the costs for operation and maintenance.

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Pakistan is characterized by some achievements and many challenges. In 2020, 68% Pakistanis, 72% Indians, 54% Bangladeshi had access to the basic sanitation facilities. Despite high population growth the country has increased the share of the population with access to an improved water source from 85% in 1990 to 92% in 2010, although this does not necessarily mean that the water from these sources is safe to drink. The share with access to improved sanitation increased from 27% to 38% during the same period, according to the Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply and Sanitation. There has also been considerable innovation at the grass-root level, in particular concerning sanitation. The Orangi Pilot Project in Karachi and community-led total sanitation in rural areas are two examples of such innovation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Mozambique</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Mozambique is characterized by low levels of access to at least basic water sources, low levels of access to at least basic sanitation and mostly poor service quality. In 2007 the government has defined a strategy for water supply and sanitation in rural areas, where 62% of the population lives. In urban areas, water is supplied by informal small-scale providers and by formal providers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Tunisia</span>

Tunisia has achieved the highest access rates to water supply and sanitation services among the Middle East and North Africa. As of 2011, access to safe drinking water became close to universal approaching 100% in urban areas and 90% in rural areas. Tunisia provides good quality drinking water throughout the year.

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Egypt directly impact the country's public health, industrial developments, and agriculture. Egypt's water and sanitation industry is characterized by both achievements and challenges. Among the achievements are an increase of piped water supply between 1998 and 2006 from 89% to 100% in urban areas and from 39% to 93% in rural areas despite rapid population growth; the elimination of open defecation in rural areas during the same period; and in general a relatively high level of investment in infrastructure. Access to an at least basic water source in Egypt is now practically universal with a rate of 98%. On the institutional side, the regulation and service provision have been separated to some extensions through the creation of a national Holding Company for Water and Wastewater in 2004, and of an economic regulator, the Egyptian Water Regulatory Agency (EWRA), in 2006. Despite these successes, many challenges remain. Only about one half of the population is connected to sanitary sewers. Because of this low sanitation coverage, about 50,000 children die each year because of diarrhea. Another challenge is low cost recovery due to water tariffs that are among the lowest in the world. This in turn requires government subsidies even for operating costs, a situation that has been aggravated by salary increases without tariff increases after the Arab Spring. Furthermore, poor operation of facilities, such as water and wastewater treatment plants, as well as limited government accountability and transparency, are also issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Burkina Faso</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Burkina Faso are characterized by high access to water supply in urban areas, while access to an at least basic water sources in rural areas – where three quarters of the population live – remains relatively low. An estimated one third of water facilities in rural areas are out of service because of a lack of maintenance. Access to at least basic sanitation lags significantly behind access to water supply.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Nigeria</span>

Responsibility of water supply in Nigeria is shared between three (3) levels of government – federal, state and local. The federal government is in charge of water resources management; state governments have the primary responsibility for urban water supply; and local governments together with communities are responsible for rural water supply. The responsibility for sanitation is not clearly defined.

Water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe is defined by many small scale successful programs but also by a general lack of improved water and sanitation systems for the majority of Zimbabwe. Water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe faces significant challenges, marked by both successful localized efforts and widespread deficiencies in infrastructure. According to the 2019 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), conducted by UNICEF, disparities persist in access to clean drinking water and sanitation facilities. While overall access to improved drinking water sources increased to 77.1% in 2019 from 76.1% in 2014, significant gaps remain between urban and rural areas, as well as within urban centers. For instance, 97.3% of urban households have access to improved water sources compared to only 67.9% of rural households. Similarly, disparities exist across regions, with Harare boasting the highest access at 96.6%, contrasting sharply with 64.8% in Matabeleland South. Additionally, approximately 67.8% of households have access to improved, non-shared sanitation facilities, indicating ongoing challenges in this domain. Urban areas, in particular, grapple with chronic water shortages amid rising consumption demands. There are many factors which continue to determine the nature, for the foreseeable future, of water supply and sanitation in Zimbabwe. Three major factors are the severely depressed state of the Zimbabwean economy, the willingness of foreign aid organizations to build and finance infrastructure projects, and the political stability of the Zimbabwean state.

Lesotho is a mountainous and fairly 'water-rich country', but suffers from a lack of clean drinking water due to inadequate sanitation. In recent decades, with the construction of dams for the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP), Lesotho has become the main provider of water to parts of northern South Africa. Despite the economic and infrastructure development occasioned by the LHWP, waterborne diseases are common in the country and the infant mortality rate from them is high. In 2017, a project to improve the rural water supply in the Lesotho Lowlands was funded by the Global Environment Facility and the African Development Bank, and is ongoing.

References

  1. 1 2 "About | WSP". www.wsp.org. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  2. ↑ "Heath P. Tarbert". World Bank. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  3. ↑ "Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership (GWSP)". World Bank. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  4. ↑ Procee, Paul (November 2016). "Water and Sanitation Program: End of Year Report" (PDF). WSP.org: 1–9.
  5. ↑ Bank, World (2011). "Water Supply and Sanitation in Benin : Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  6. ↑ Jones, Oliver (June 2015). "Monitoring sanitation and hygiene in rural Ethiopia: A diagnostic analysis of systems, tools and capacity" (PDF).
  7. ↑ "Water Supply and Sanitation in Kenya: Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond" (PDF). 2010.
  8. ↑ Mohan, P. C., ed. (2006-06-01). "Madagascar : Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Project".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. ↑ Bank, The World (2011-01-01). "Water supply and sanitation in Niger : turning finance into services for 2015 and beyond".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ↑ "Water Supply and Sanitation in Senegal: Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond" (PDF). 2010.
  11. ↑ Water, African Ministers' Council on (2011-06-30). "Water Supply and Sanitation in Tanzania : Turning Finance into Services for 2015 and Beyond".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. 1 2 O’Connell, Kathryn (2014). What Influences Open Defecation and Latrine Ownership in Rural Households?: Findings from a Global Review. World Bank.
  13. ↑ Devine, Jacqueline (2009). Introducing SaniFOAM: A Framework to Analyze Sanitation Behaviors to Design Effective Sanitation Programs. World Bank.
  14. ↑ "Haiti Rural Water and Sanitation Project". Water Technology. Retrieved 2018-01-31.
  15. ↑ Scheierling, Susanne M. (2016-10-19). "New directions in the economics of agricultural water conservation". The Water Blog. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  16. ↑ "Domestic Private Sector Participation (DPSP) | WSP". www.wsp.org. Retrieved 2018-02-05.
  17. ↑ "OPINION: World Bank wants water privatized, despite risks" . Retrieved 2018-02-05.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 "New Partnership Aims to Help Countries Achieve a Water-Secure World for All". World Bank. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  19. 1 2 3 "About | WSP". www.wsp.org. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  20. ↑ "Press Releases". ifcextapps.ifc.org. Retrieved 2018-01-31.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.