Author | James Hannam |
---|---|
Country | United Kingdom |
Language | English |
Genre | History of science |
Publisher | Icon Books |
Publication date | 2009 |
Pages | 435 |
ISBN | 9781848311503 |
God's Philosophers: How the Medieval World Laid the Foundations of Modern Science is a 2009 book written by British historian of science James Hannam (UK: Icon Books).
The book challenges the view that "there was no science worth mentioning in the Middle Ages … [and] that the Church held back what meagre advances were made". [1] Hannam rebuts a number of modern myths about Medieval Christianity such as the idea that the Inquisition burned people for their science or that people in the Middle Ages thought the Earth was flat. [2] He lists 13th century inventions such as spectacles and the mechanical clock to argue that "medieval scholars overturned the false wisdom of ancient Greece to lay the foundations of modern science." [3]
The US edition of the book was published in 2011 by Regnery Press under the title The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution. [4]
In his introduction to God’s Philosophers, Hannam sets forth his argument that many of the negative descriptions of the Middle Ages as a “scientific dark age” is based on myth. [5] "Popular opinion, journalistic cliché and misinformed historians notwithstanding, recent research has shown that the Middle Ages was a period of enormous advances in science, technology and culture." [6] The first twelve chapters of the book are devoted to sciences in the Middle Ages; the last nine chapters consider the Renaissance and Reformation. Galileo is the focus of the last three chapters (19–21). [7]
In chapter one Hannam gives a brief historical outline of the early Middle Ages up to AD1000. Hannam writes that during this period western Europe recovered from the fall of the Roman Empire and began to rebuild with the emergence of several important inventions, like the plough, horseshoe and watermill. [7]
From chapter two to chapter thirteen, Hannam covers a wide range of topics relating to the history of science, such as mathematics, astronomy, physics, medicine, alchemy and astrology.
Chapter three ("The Rise of Reason") and chapter four ("The Twelfth-Century Renaissance") seeks to show how the West regained the heritage of ancient Greek learning. Hannam contends that the "rise of reason" [8] is not the Enlightenment, but the eleventh and twelfth century turn to natural theology. [9] He refers to the medieval university as the fundamental institutional entity. He further contends that the starting point for all of natural philosophy in the Middle Ages was the belief that nature had been created by God. Thus, medieval philosophers expected to find logic and reason in natural phenomena. [10]
Hannam then turns to the subject of medicine, suggesting there were three options in the Middle Ages for a person who fell ill: "the church, the local healer, or a qualified doctor". [11] He describes how each might treat their patient. Hannam declares that, with the exception of smallpox vaccinations, ‘"the history of medicine until the midnineteenth century… is a history of failure." [12]
In chapter eight on "The Secret Arts of Alchemy and Astrology", Hannam looks at astrology and the Church’s attitude toward it.
Other chapters also include interesting cases of relevant scientific activity. In Chapter 10 Hannam introduces Oxford scholar – Richard of Wallingford (1292–1336) and his invention of the mechanical clock: "Besides his achievements in astronomy, he built one of the finest and most complicated clocks of the Middle Ages, despite suffering from the dreadful affliction of leprosy." [13]
Chapter eleven ("The Merton Calculators’") and twelve ("The Apogee of Medieval Science") reveal the advances in scientific thought that occurred at the universities of Oxford and Paris in the fourteenth century. Hannam points to Bradwardine’s "law of motion"; descriptions of falling objects in a vacuum; and the mean speed theorem, as illustrated by William Heytesbury. [14] Hannam also describes Buridan and Oresme’s discussion of the Earth’s possible axial rotation, and Albert of Saxony’s description of the trajectory of a flying cannon ball. Regarding whether these speculations threatened the church, Hannam writes "almost all the practitioners were members of the clergy…mechanics and mathematics did not cause any concern." [15]
On the more delicate issue of the rejection of atomism which challenged the Catholic view of Holy Communion he said "certainly, this was a clear cut of theological orthodoxy curtailing philosophical enquiry. But this happened so rarely that we cannot maintain that the Church held back science in general." [16] He continued: "the popular image of the medieval church as a monolithic institution opposing any sort of scientific speculation is clearly inaccurate. Natural philosophy had proven itself useful and worth supporting. It is hard to imagine how any philosophy at all would have taken place if the Church-sponsored universities had not provided a home for it." [16]
In chapter thirteen, Hannam explores the voyages of Christopher Columbus and how he did not believe the Earth was flat, as some claim.
Some other impressive scientific achievements discussed include the invention of eyeglasses, windmills, and the printing press. [5]
Hannam then turns to the rise of humanism and its impact on science and technology in chapter fourteen. [9]
While Humanists recovered ancient Greek mathematical texts, Hannam rejects their advances made in philosophy during this period. Moreover, he states that the Protestant Reformation broke the Catholic Church’s ability to control science however also made it less accepting of new ideas. [17]
In chapter sixteen, Hannam demonstrates how human dissection advanced the understanding of the human body. The myth removed by Hannam is that the medieval Church opposed human dissection: "If the Catholic Church had really objected strongly to human dissections, they would not have rapidly become part of the syllabus in every major European medical school." [18]
Chapter seventeen relates the story of how Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) supposed that the Earth orbited the Sun, and not the other way around as was the consensus at the time. Hannam again suggests that Copernicus owed his theory to much earlier scholars such as John Buridan who in 1350 proposed that sunrise and sunset was caused by the Earth moving, and not the Sun. [1]
Chapter eighteen shows how Copernicus’s theory was adopted by Johannes Kepler (1571–1630).
The last three chapters focus on Galileo and his contemporaries, who is probably the most well-known among the scientists supposedly persecuted by the Church. [19] Hannam suggests that Galileo borrowed ideas from earlier thinkers and used them to construct his own theories about matter and motion: "Galileo pulled together many of the strands of medieval thought to form the basis of modern science." [20]
In his brief conclusion Hannam contends that four cornerstones - institutional, technological, metaphysical, and theoretical - laid the foundations of early modern science. [3]
Edward Grant, acclaimed historian of medieval science, wrote that the book was "very well written and a delight to read". [3] Grant lauded Hannam’s account for its "unusual descriptions of various aspects of contemporary life", that made it "extremely interesting and engaging." [21] Grant disagreed with some of Hannam’s claims yet summed up the book this way: "Hannam has written a splendid book and fully supported his claim that the Middle Ages laid the foundations of modern science…although it was intended for a non-academic audience, this book would prove quite useful as a text in a university course in the history of science." [22]
The book was praised by historian and journalist Dan Jones in Spectator as a "very useful general survey of a difficult topic, and a robust defence of an unfairly maligned age…Hannam…gives us a great sense of the porousness of the medieval mind." [1]
Igal Galili, professor of science education, interpreted the book as "well written and interesting." [10] Galili contends the book should be included in physics education by means of the history and philosophy of science: "This could seem to be an issue for general curiosity, but it is not, since without awareness of this debt that we owe in science education, we easily make inadequate inferences regarding the nature of science, and we often misinterpret the meaning of the knowledge that we possess and teach." [23]
Writing in Philosophy in Review , philosopher and energetics historian Robert Deltete, warmly recommended the book as "an engaging read". [24] He writes, "In opposition to popular opinion, journalistic cliche, and misinformed historians, Hannam shows that the Middle Ages was a period of enormous advances in science, technology and culture." [24] Hannam does an "especially nice job" of appealing to general readers. Deltete makes one concession, "that Hannam’s motives sometimes seem overly apologetic in emphasizing Church tolerance and excusing Church excesses". But this doesn’t detract from Hannam as "a very good storyteller who manages to bring to life a plethora of obscure figures." [24]
Jonathan Birch, intellectual historian and researcher at the University of Glasgow, dubbed Hannam’s project "a success", but stated he had some reservations about the focus in parts of the book. [9] Birch cites Peter Abelard’s tragic romance with Héloïse and the darkly comic picture of Abelard’s castration. Birch writes "such stories add human drama to the history of ideas, but do interesting biographical vignettes come at the expense of intellectual content?" [9] In the book’s section on St Thomas Aquinas "some important arguments are stated rather than fully explained." Birch concludes: "specialists in other areas could no doubt stake a claim for more detailed discussions of their own preoccupations… but collectively these claims would place an unfair burden on a book with this scope. God’s Philosophers contributes admirably to the public understanding of the complex and interconnected histories of science, philosophy and religion." [9]
Boris Johnson reviewed the book in The Mail on Sunday . He wrote "...this wonderful book. With an engaging fervour, James Hannam has set about rescuing the reputation of a bunch of half-forgotten thinkers, and he shows how they paved the way for modern science." [25]
Reviewing the book in The Guardian , Tim Radford questioned Hannam’s project: "Medieval scholars anticipated a surprising number of scientific innovations, but does that really make them the founders of modern science?" [19] He goes on to write "Almost the only annoying thing about James Hannam's admirable book is his opening insistence on a conspiracy of 'popular opinion, journalistic cliche and misinformed historians' to denigrate the Middle Ages… in this conspiracy, whenever someone discovered evidence of reason or progress in the 14th or 15th centuries, he writes 'it could easily be labelled 'early-Renaissance' so as to preserve the negative connotations of the adjective 'medieval'. The OED gives no dates for the medieval period, but it tells me that the Renaissance began in Italy in the 14th century." [19]
Charles Freeman criticized Hannam’s book in the New Humanist for its "distorted view of the medieval period and the development of science that suits his Catholic agenda". [5] In the very specific context of the books inclusion on the Royal Society Book of the Year shortlist, Freeman wrote that God’s Philosophers doesn’t deserve all of its accolades, and that "its vivid style masks a number of serious academic weaknesses which combine to make the book vastly overrated." Freeman attacks the book for being "poorly structured, without a coherent argument and often misleading, either through making assertions for which there is no, or contrary, evidence or by omitting evidence that would weaken its case". For example, Hannam "virtually ignores" Ancient Greek and Arab contributions to modern science. Freeman concludes "Its success is mystifying." [5]
Hannam replied to Freeman’s criticism of his book, which New Humanist published also. In response to Freeman’s claim that he ignored Greek and Arab intellectual traditions, Hannam wrote, "I hardly ignore the achievements of either of these civilisations. I just didn’t write a book about them." [26] Hannam concluded, "while I make no secret of my religious affiliations, if I woke up tomorrow as an atheist, I would stand by every word of it." [26]
The book was shortlisted in 2010 for the Royal Society Prize for Science Books. The judges said:
"A vibrant insight into the medieval approach to science, full of wonderful anecdotes and personalities. Dispelling common myths about the ‘dark ages’, this is a very readable book about a neglected era in the history of science. It very much fills a gap, making you realise that the great scientific achievements of the Renaissance are in debt to the "philosophers" prepared to sacrifice long held beliefs and frequently their lives for their ideas." [27]
In 2011 it was shortlisted for the Dingle Prize of the British Society for the History of Science. [28]
The Renaissance is a period in history and a cultural movement marking the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity, covering the 15th and 16th centuries and characterized by an effort to revive and surpass the ideas and achievements of classical antiquity; it occurred after the crisis of the Late Middle Ages and was associated with great social change in most fields and disciplines, including art, architecture, politics, literature, exploration and science. In addition to the standard periodization, proponents of a "long Renaissance" may put its beginning in the 14th century and its end in the 17th century.
Scholasticism was a medieval school of philosophy that employed a critical organic method of philosophical analysis predicated upon the Aristotelian 10 Categories. Christian scholasticism emerged within the monastic schools that translated scholastic Judeo-Islamic philosophies, and thereby "rediscovered" the collected works of Aristotle. Endeavoring to harmonize his metaphysics and its account of a prime mover with the Latin Catholic dogmatic trinitarian theology, these monastic schools became the basis of the earliest European medieval universities, contributing to the development of modern science; scholasticism dominated education in Europe from about 1100 to 1700. The rise of scholasticism was closely associated with these schools that flourished in Italy, France, Portugal, Spain and England.
Adelard of Bath was a 12th-century English natural philosopher. He is known both for his original works and for translating many important Greek scientific works of astrology, astronomy, philosophy, alchemy and mathematics into Latin from Arabic versions, which were then introduced to Western Europe. The oldest surviving Latin translation of Euclid's Elements is a 12th-century translation by Adelard from an Arabic version. He is known as one of the first to introduce the Arabic numeral system to Europe. He stands at the convergence of three intellectual schools: the traditional learning of French schools, the Greek culture of Southern Italy, and the Arabic science of the East.
The Dark Ages is a term for the Early Middle Ages or occasionally the entire Middle Ages, in Western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire that characterises it as marked by economic, intellectual, and cultural decline.
Renaissance humanism was a worldview centered on the nature and importance of humanity, that emerged from the study of Classical antiquity. This first began in Italy and then spread across Western Europe in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries. During the period, the term humanist referred to teachers and students of the humanities, known as the studia humanitatis, which included the study of Latin and Ancient Greek literatures, grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry, and moral philosophy. It was not until the 19th century that this began to be called humanism instead of the original humanities, and later by the retronym Renaissance humanism to distinguish it from later humanist developments. During the Renaissance period most humanists were Christians, so their concern was to "purify and renew Christianity", not to do away with it. Their vision was to return ad fontes to the simplicity of the Gospels and rediscovery of the New Testament, bypassing the complexities of medieval Christian theology.
The Italian Renaissance was a period in Italian history covering the 15th and 16th centuries. The period is known for the initial development of the broader Renaissance culture that spread across Western Europe and marked the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity. Proponents of a "long Renaissance" argue that it started around the year 1300 and lasted until about 1600. In some fields, a Proto-Renaissance, beginning around 1250, is typically accepted. The French word renaissance means "rebirth", and defines the period as one of cultural revival and renewed interest in Classical antiquity after the centuries during what Renaissance humanists labelled as the "Dark Ages". The Italian Renaissance historian Giorgio Vasari used the term rinascita ("rebirth") in his Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects in 1550, but the concept became widespread only in the 19th century, after the work of scholars such as Jules Michelet and Jacob Burckhardt.
Edward Grant was an American historian of medieval science. He was named a distinguished professor in 1983. Other honors include the 1992 George Sarton Medal, for "a lifetime scholarly achievement" as an historian of science.
The Condemnations at the medieval University of Paris were enacted to restrict certain teachings as being heretical. These included a number of medieval theological teachings, but most importantly the physical treatises of Aristotle. The investigations of these teachings were conducted by the Bishops of Paris. The Condemnations of 1277 are traditionally linked to an investigation requested by Pope John XXI, although whether he actually supported drawing up a list of condemnations is unclear.
The Renaissance of the 12th century was a period of many changes at the outset of the High Middle Ages. It included social, political and economic transformations, and an intellectual revitalization of Western Europe with strong philosophical and scientific roots. These changes paved the way for later achievements such as the literary and artistic movement of the Italian Renaissance in the 15th century and the scientific developments of the 17th century.
Humanism is a philosophical stance that emphasizes the individual and social potential, and agency of human beings, whom it considers the starting point for serious moral and philosophical inquiry.
In the history of ideas, the continuity thesis is the hypothesis that there was no radical discontinuity between the intellectual development of the Middle Ages and the developments in the Renaissance and early modern period. Thus the idea of an intellectual or scientific revolution following the Renaissance is, according to the continuity thesis, a myth. Some continuity theorists point to earlier intellectual revolutions occurring in the Middle Ages, usually referring to the European Renaissance of the 12th century as a sign of continuity. Despite the many points that have been brought up by proponents of the continuity thesis, a majority of scholars still support the traditional view of the Scientific Revolution occurring in the 16th and 17th centuries.
The myth of the flat Earth, or the flat-Earth error, is a modern historical misconception that European scholars and educated people during the Middle Ages believed the Earth to be flat.
A university is an institution of higher education and research which awards academic degrees in several academic disciplines. Universities typically offer both undergraduate and postgraduate programs.
The relationship between science and the Catholic Church is a widely debated subject. Historically, the Catholic Church has been a patron of sciences. It has been prolific in the foundation and funding of schools, universities, and hospitals, and many clergy have been active in the sciences. Some historians of science such as Pierre Duhem credit medieval Catholic mathematicians and philosophers such as John Buridan, Nicole Oresme, and Roger Bacon as the founders of modern science. Duhem found "the mechanics and physics, of which modern times are justifiably proud, to proceed by an uninterrupted series of scarcely perceptible improvements from doctrines professed in the heart of the medieval schools." Historian John Heilbron says that “The Roman Catholic Church gave more financial and social support to the study of astronomy for over six centuries, from the recovery of ancient learning during the late Middle Ages into the Enlightenment, than any other, and probably all, other Institutions.” The conflict thesis and other critiques emphasize the historical or contemporary conflict between the Catholic Church and science, citing, in particular, the trial of Galileo as evidence. For its part, the Catholic Church teaches that science and the Christian faith are complementary, as can be seen from the Catechism of the Catholic Church which states in regards to faith and science:
Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth. ... Consequently, methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God despite himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are.
Medieval philosophy is the philosophy that existed through the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century until after the Renaissance in the 13th and 14th centuries. Medieval philosophy, understood as a project of independent philosophical inquiry, began in Baghdad, in the middle of the 8th century, and in France, in the itinerant court of Charlemagne, in the last quarter of the 8th century. It is defined partly by the process of rediscovering the ancient culture developed in Greece and Rome during the Classical period, and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate sacred doctrine with secular learning. This is one of the defining characteristics in this time period. Understanding God was the focal point of study of the philosophers at that time, Muslim and Christian alike.
European science in the Middle Ages comprised the study of nature, mathematics and natural philosophy in medieval Europe. Following the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the decline in knowledge of Greek, Christian Western Europe was cut off from an important source of ancient learning. Although a range of Christian clerics and scholars from Isidore and Bede to Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme maintained the spirit of rational inquiry, Western Europe would see a period of scientific decline during the Early Middle Ages. However, by the time of the High Middle Ages, the region had rallied and was on its way to once more taking the lead in scientific discovery. Scholarship and scientific discoveries of the Late Middle Ages laid the groundwork for the Scientific Revolution of the Early Modern Period.
The medieval renaissances were periods characterised by significant cultural renewal across medieval Western Europe. These are effectively seen as occurring in three phases - the Carolingian Renaissance, Ottonian Renaissance and the Renaissance of the 12th century.
Most scientific and technical innovations prior to the scientific revolution were achieved by societies organized by religious traditions. Ancient pagan, Islamic, and Christian scholars pioneered individual elements of the scientific method. Historically, Christianity has been and still is a patron of sciences. It has been prolific in the foundation of schools, universities and hospitals, and many Christian clergy have been active in the sciences, and have made significant contributions to the development of science.