Harvard Six Cities study

Last updated

The Harvard "Six Cities" study was a major epidemiological study of over 8,000 adults in six American cities that helped to establish the connection between fine-particulate air pollution (such as diesel engine soot) and reduced life expectancy ("excess mortality"). [1] Widely acknowledged as a landmark piece of public health research, [2] [3] [4] it was initiated by Benjamin G. Ferris, Jr [5] at Harvard School of Public Health and carried out by Harvard's Douglas Dockery, C. Arden Pope of Brigham Young University, Ferris himself, Frank E. Speizer, and four other collaborators, and published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1993. [1] Following a lawsuit by The American Lung Association, the study, and its various follow-ups, led to a tightening of pollution standards by the US Environmental Protection Agency. This prompted an intense backlash from industry groups in the late 1990s, culminating in a Supreme Court case, in what Science magazine termed "the biggest environmental fight of the decade". [6] [7]

Contents

Background

The Six Cities study was born in the wake of the 1970s energy crisis amid growing concerns that a squeeze on oil supply would lead to greater use of low-quality coal and, therefore, higher mortality from air pollution. [8] The harmful health effects of burning coal had already come to light following the 1952 Great London Smog (in the United Kingdom), the 1948 Donora tragedy (in the United States), and other major pollution episodes, but it was unclear which part of coal pollution (sulphur dioxide, particulates, or some combination of these and other emissions) was of most concern. [8] There were also differences of scientific opinion about how particulates affected human health, which types were most harmful, and whether there were impacts even at low to moderate levels of exposure. [6] The Harvard Six Cities study aimed to address some of these questions. [6] [8]

As it acknowledged in its introduction, it built on a number of earlier studies that had found "associations between mortality rates and particulate air pollution in U.S. metropolitan areas", including a 1970 Science paper "Air Pollution and Human Health" by Lester Lave and Eugene Seskin of Carnegie Mellon University. [9] [10] Crucially, unlike the earlier studies, which were generally cross-sectional in design (statistical snapshots of large, anonymous populations taken at arbitrary times), the Harvard Six Cities was a cohort study that tracked the same people over their lives, so allowing risk factors such as age, sex, and smoking history to be eliminated, and the effects of air pollution to be studied in isolation. [6]

Methodology

Dockery and colleagues studied a cohort of 8,111 adults living in six American cities "selected as representative of the range of particulate air pollution in the United States": Harriman, Tennessee; Portage, Wisconsin; St Louis, Missouri; Steubenville, Ohio; Topeka, Kansas and Watertown, Massachusetts. Over a decade and a half, each person was questioned on such things as their medical history and lifestyle (including whether and how much they smoked, their body mass index, their education level, average age, and so on). This data was compared with ambient air pollution measurements from the six cities and mortality data from the National Death Index. [1]

Conclusion

The study found that people living in the most polluted city (Steubenville) were 26 percent more likely to die than those in the least polluted city (Portage), [7] [11] suggesting an association between particulate pollution and higher death rates in urban areas: "Although the effects of other, unmeasured risk factors cannot be excluded with certainty, these results suggest that fine-particulate air pollution, or a more complex pollution mixture associated with fine particulate matter, contributes to excess mortality in certain U.S. cities." [1] [12]

Confirmation

The Six Cities study was followed (and its findings effectively confirmed) by a much bigger epidemiological project, generally referred to as the American Cancer Society (ACS) study, which was carried out by three authors of the original study (Pope, Dockery, and Frank E. Speizer) and four other collaborators. The ACS study correlated air pollution data, lifestyle factors, and death records for a sample of 552,138 adults in 151 urban areas followed over a 16-year period and concluded, just as the original had done, that breathing particulate pollution increases a person's risk of death: "Particulate air pollution was associated with cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality but not with mortality due to other causes. Increased mortality is associated with sulfate and fine particulate air pollution at levels commonly found in U.S. cities." [12] [13] A variety of similar epidemiological studies have also supported the association between fine particulate pollution and higher mortality. [6] Crucially, a 2006 paper by Francine Laden and members of the original Harvard team (Frank Speizer and Douglas Dockery) also confirmed the opposite effect: reductions in particulate pollution save lives. [14]

Impact

Following the publication of the Six Cities and ACS studies, there were new calls for tougher pollution standards in the United States, and The American Lung Association ultimately sued the US Environmental Protection Agency to bring that about. [6] [15] As a result, in 1997, the EPA introduced the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) with new limits on particulates. [16] This, in turn, prompted pushback from industry groups and various legal challenges, including a request to release data from the original studies for scrutiny by third parties. [8] Medical confidentiality agreements prevented this, so, as a compromise, the studies were independently re-analyzed by Daniel Krewski, Richard Burnett, and colleagues on behalf of the Health Effects Institute, which used different statistical methods but essentially confirmed the original findings. [8] [17]

The legal challenges were eventually settled by a Supreme Court ruling on February 27, 2001 (Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, S.Ct. No. 99-1257) that unanimously sided with the EPA. [18] [19] [20] Since then, largely as a result of the initial Six Cities and ACS studies, and the follow-up research they inspired, air quality standards and guidelines for particulate pollution have been introduced throughout the world - potentially saving many millions of lives. [4] [12] According to air pollution scientist Gary Fuller: "It is hard to overstate the impact of the Six Cities study on global health... the results still offer the best estimate for how much our lives are shortened by the particle pollution that we breathe." [21]

Proposed EPA "Honest Act"

When then-EPA director, Scott Pruitt, announced his proposed scientific research policy requiring full transparency of all studies that inform public environmental policies, this would have excluded studies, such as the Six Cities studies, because they used confidential data in personal medical reports that could not be made openly available. [22] Critics of Pruitt's policy traced its roots to the Harvard Six Cities study. [22] Various iterations of the bill have been supported by American Chemistry Council, an organization that advises DuPont and Monsanto, among others. It has also been supported by Koch Industries, Peabody Energy, and ExxonMobil. According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, some within the chemical, manufacturing and energy sector did not approve of the clean air regulations that were implemented because of the Six Cities studies, so they are trying to "attack the science underlying the regulation". The "demand for transparency" was in reality a way to "undermine scientific independence." The Honest and Open New E.P.A. Science Treatment Act, which was sponsored by Lamar Smith (R-Texas) provided the basis for Pruitt's plans for transparency in science policy that he announced on The Daily Caller in March 2018. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smog</span> Smoke-like, fog-like air pollutions

Smog, or smoke fog, is a type of intense air pollution. The word "smog" was coined in the early 20th century, and is a portmanteau of the words smoke and fog to refer to smoky fog due to its opacity, and odor. The word was then intended to refer to what was sometimes known as pea soup fog, a familiar and serious problem in London from the 19th century to the mid-20th century, where it was commonly known as a London particular or London fog. This kind of visible air pollution is composed of nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxide, ozone, smoke and other particulates. Man-made smog is derived from coal combustion emissions, vehicular emissions, industrial emissions, forest and agricultural fires and photochemical reactions of these emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exhaust gas</span> Gases emitted as a result of fuel reactions in combustion engines

Exhaust gas or flue gas is emitted as a result of the combustion of fuels such as natural gas, gasoline (petrol), diesel fuel, fuel oil, biodiesel blends, or coal. According to the type of engine, it is discharged into the atmosphere through an exhaust pipe, flue gas stack, or propelling nozzle. It often disperses downwind in a pattern called an exhaust plume.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollutant Standards Index</span> Index to describe air quality

The Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) is a type of air quality index used in Singapore, which is a number used to indicate the level of pollutants in air. Initially PSI was based on five air pollutants, but since 1 April 2014 it has also included fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. Arden Pope</span> American economist

C. Arden Pope III is an American professor of economics at Brigham Young University and one of the world's foremost experts in environmental science. He received his B.S. from Brigham Young University (BYU) in 1978 and his Ph.D. in economics and statistics from Iowa State University in 1981. Although his research includes many papers on topics in the fields in which he was trained—environmental economics, resource economics, and agricultural economics—he is better known for his cross-disciplinary work in environmental epidemiology and public health. He is world-renowned for his seminal work on the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality and health. His articles have helped establish the connection between air pollution and health problems, including cancer, cardiovascular, and pulmonary disease. These research findings have influenced environmental policy in the United States and Europe, contributing to the establishment of emission standards for particulate matter pollution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air pollution</span> Presence of dangerous substances in the atmosphere

Air pollution is the contamination of air due to the presence of substances called pollutants in the atmosphere that are harmful to the health of humans and other living beings, or cause damage to the climate or to materials. It is also the contamination of the indoor or outdoor environment either by chemical, physical, or biological agents that alters the natural features of the atmosphere. There are many different types of air pollutants, such as gases, particulates, and biological molecules. Air pollution can cause diseases, allergies, and even death to humans; it can also cause harm to other living organisms such as animals and crops, and may damage the natural environment or built environment. Air pollution can be caused by both human activities and natural phenomena.

The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP) is an open source, Windows-based computer program created by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that estimates the health benefits from improvements in air quality. State, local and international users have used BenMAP to estimate the health benefits of improved air quality. BenMAP includes information users need to start performing a benefits analysis; advanced users can customize the program to meet their needs. Because BenMAP is based on a GIS, the results can be mapped for ease of presentation.

Ultrafine particles (UFPs) are particulate matter of nanoscale size (less than 0.1 μm or 100 nm in diameter). Regulations do not exist for this size class of ambient air pollution particles, which are far smaller than the regulated PM10 and PM2.5 particle classes and are believed to have several more aggressive health implications than those classes of larger particulates. Although they remain largely unregulated, the World Health Organization has published good practice statements regarding measuring UFPs.

Air pollution is the introduction of chemicals, particulate matter, or biological materials into the atmosphere, causing harm or discomfort to humans or other living organisms, or damaging ecosystems. Air pollution can cause health problems including, but not limited to, infections, behavioral changes, cancer, organ failure, and premature death. These health effects are not equally distributed across the U.S. population; there are demographic disparities by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education. Air pollution can derive from natural sources, or anthropogenic sources. Anthropogenic air pollution has affected the United States since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Organic molecular tracers in pollution control and environmental science are referred to as organic molecular markers or emission markers, and are compounds or compound classes. These tracers are of interest in the field of air quality because they can help identify particulate emission sources, as they are relatively unique to those sources. This approach is generally applied to particulate matter under 2.5μm in diameter because of the formation mechanisms and the health risks associated with this size regime. With tracer compounds, the principles of mass balance are used to 'trace' emissions from the source to the receptor site where a sample is taken. Use of organic tracers has become more common as measurement quality has improved, costs have decreased, and compounds that were historically good tracers, such as lead, have decreased in ambient concentrations due to various factors including government regulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Particulates</span> Microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earths atmosphere

Particulates or atmospheric particulate matter are microscopic particles of solid or liquid matter suspended in the air. The term aerosol commonly refers to the particulate/air mixture, as opposed to the particulate matter alone. Sources of particulate matter can be natural or anthropogenic. They have impacts on climate and precipitation that adversely affect human health, in ways additional to direct inhalation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air pollution measurement</span>

Air pollution measurement is the process of collecting and measuring the components of air pollution, notably gases and particulates. The earliest devices used to measure pollution include rain gauges, Ringelmann charts for measuring smoke, and simple soot and dust collectors known as deposit gauges. Modern air pollution measurement is largely automated and carried out using many different devices and techniques. These range from simple absorbent test tubes known as diffusion tubes through to highly sophisticated chemical and physical sensors that give almost real-time pollution measurements, which are used to generate air quality indexes.

Douglas William Dockery is an American epidemiologist and the John L. Loeb and Frances Lehman Loeb Professor of Environmental Epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

AirQ+ is a free software for Windows and Linux operating systems developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. The program calculates the magnitude of several health effects associated to exposure to the most relevant air pollutants in a given population. AirQ+ has been used in the BreatheLife campaign and in numerous studies aimed at measuring long-term exposure to ambient particulate matter PM2.5. The first version of the program, AirQ, was distributed in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program in 1999, followed by another version of AirQ for Windows in 2000, 2004 and 2005. AirQ+ 1.0 was released in May 2016. A substantial difference between AirQ and AirQ+ is that AirQ+ contains a new graphical user interface with several help texts and various features to input and analyse data and illustrate results. AirQ+ version AirQ+ 1.2 was released in May 2017, followed by 1.3 in October 2018. Version 2.0 was released in November 2019, version 2.1 in May 2021 and version 2.2 in March 2023. It is available in the official languages of the WHO EURO region: English, French, German and Russian. A Polish version of AirQ+ is also available since 2023 and Spanish, Arab and Parsi versions are planned to be available in 2024.

Elizabeth Anne (Lianne) Sheppard is an American statistician. She specializes in biostatistics and environmental statistics, and in particular in the effects of air quality on health. She is a Professor of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences and a Professor of Biostatistics in the University of Washington School of Public Health. In 2021, Dr. Sheppard was named to the Rohm & Haas Endowed Professorship of Public Health Sciences.

Kimberly A. Prather is an American atmospheric chemist. She is a distinguished chair in atmospheric chemistry and a distinguished professor at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and department of chemistry and biochemistry at UC San Diego. Her work focuses on how humans are influencing the atmosphere and climate. In 2019, she was elected a member of the National Academy of Engineering for technologies that transformed understanding of aerosols and their impacts on air quality, climate, and human health. In 2020, she was elected as a member of the National Academy of Sciences. She is also an elected Fellow of the American Philosophical Society, American Geophysical Union, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Philosophical Society, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air quality in Utah</span> Quality of air in Utah

Air quality in Utah is often some of the worst in the United States. Poor air quality in Utah is due to the mountainous topography which can cause pollutants to build up near the surface combined with the prevalence of emissions from gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles, especially older models. Burning wood fuel for home heating can also contribute significantly to poor air quality. Homes heated with wood contribute about 3000 times the amount of pollution as homes heated with natural gas. About 50% of air pollution in Salt Lake County is from vehicles.

Particulate pollution is pollution of an environment that consists of particles suspended in some medium. There are three primary forms: atmospheric particulate matter, marine debris, and space debris. Some particles are released directly from a specific source, while others form in chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Particulate pollution can be derived from either natural sources or anthropogenic processes.

Frank Erwin Speizer is an American physician and epidemiologist, currently Professor of Environmental Health and Environmental Science at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Edward H. Kass Distinguished Professor of Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. He is best known for his work on two major epidemiological cohort studies: the Nurses' Health Study, which explored women's illnesses and health risk factors, and the Harvard Six Cities study, which definitively linked air pollution to higher death rates in urban areas.

Francine Laden is an American epidemiologist who is Professor of Environmental Epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Her research has investigated the environmental epidemiology of chronic disease. She serves as co-director of the Harvard University and Boston University center for research on environmental and social stressors in housing across the life course. Laden has also served on the United States Environmental Protection Agency advisory board.

Lester Barnard Lave was an American economist who helped pioneer the field of environmental economics, notably the idea that environmental problems have quantifiable economic costs. In August 1970, over two decades before the Harvard Six Cities study definitively settled the issue, Lave and his graduate student Eugene P. Seskin published research suggesting that air pollution in American cities was causing higher death rates and attempted to calculate its economic cost.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Dockery, Douglas; Pope, C. Arden; Xu, Xiping; Spengler, John; Ware, James; Fay, Martha; Ferris, Benjamin; Speizer, Frank (December 9, 1993). "An Association between Air Pollution and Mortality in Six U.S. Cities". New England Journal of Medicine . 329 (24): 1753–1759. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312093292401 . PMID   8179653.
  2. Laden, F (October 2019). "A Tale of Six Cities: The Landmark Harvard Six Cities Study". Environmental Epidemiology. 3: 221. doi: 10.1097/01.EE9.0000608272.94008.7b . S2CID   210638367.
  3. "Prevailing Winds: A decades-long fight to bring clean air standards in line with environmental health science offers lessons for today". Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 11 September 2012. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  4. 1 2 Woodford, Chris (2021). Breathless: Why Air Pollution Matters and How it Affects You. London: Icon. p. 84. ISBN   9781785787102.
  5. "Former SPH Professor Dies". Harvard Crimson. Harvard University. August 9, 1996.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pope, C. Arden; Dockery, D (2006). "Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect". Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association . 56 (6): 709–742. Bibcode:2006JAWMA..56..709P. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485 . PMID   16805397. S2CID   8299285.
  7. 1 2 Kaiser, Jocelyn (July 25, 1997). "Showdown over Clean Air Science". Science . 277 (5325): 466–469. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.466. PMID   9254414. S2CID   28219089.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Boslaugh, Sarah (2008). Encyclopedia of Epidemiology. SAGE. p. 255. ISBN   9781412928168 . Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  9. Lave, Lester B.; Seskin, Eugene P. (21 August 1970). "Air Pollution and Human Health". Science. 169 (3947): 723–733. Bibcode:1970Sci...169..723L. doi:10.1126/science.169.3947.723. eISSN   1095-9203. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   5432570.
  10. "Economist warns of air pollution cost". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 11 March 2013. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
  11. "Study Ties Fouled Air to High Urban Death Rates". New York Times . December 9, 1993. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  12. 1 2 3 Guo, Liang-Hong (December 2016). "Haze and health". National Science Review . 3 (4): 412–413. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww071 . Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  13. Pope, C.; Thun, M.; Namboodiri, M.; Dockery, D.; Evans, J.; Speizer, F.; Heath, J. (March 1995). "Particulate Air Pollution as a Predictor of Mortality in a Prospective Study of U.S. Adults". American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 151 (3_pt_1): 669–674. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.669. PMID   7881654.
  14. Laden, F.; Schwartz, J.; Speizer, F.; Dockery, D. (March 15, 2006). "Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study". American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine . 173 (6): 667–672. doi:10.1164/rccm.200503-443OC. PMC   2662950 . PMID   16424447.
  15. Ricci, Paolo (2006). Environmental and Health Risk Assessment and Management: Principles and Practices. Netherlands: Springer. p. 12. ISBN   9781402037764.
  16. "Still Defiant, but Subtler, Industry Awaits E.P.A. Rules". The New York Times. May 27, 1997. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  17. Krewski, Daniel; Burnett, Richard; Goldberg, Mark; Hoover, Kristin; Siemiatycki, Jack; Jerrett, Michael; Abrahamowicz, Michal; White, Warren (2003). "Overview of the reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health . 66 (16–19): 1507–1551. Bibcode:2003JTEHA..66.1507K. doi:10.1080/15287390306424. PMID   12959828. S2CID   23091904 . Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  18. Moeller, Dade W. (1997). Environmental Health. Harvard University Press. p. 67. ISBN   9781612197838.
  19. "Supreme Court Upholds Clean Air Standards Against Industry Attack". EarthJustice. February 27, 2001. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  20. "Whitman v. American Trucking Associations U.S. Supreme Court, Nos. 99-1257, 99-1426" (PDF). epa.gov. US Environmental Protection Agency. February 27, 2001. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  21. Fuller, Gary (2019). The Invisible Killer: The Rising Global Threat of Air Pollution--and How We Can Fight Back. London: Melville House. p. 94. ISBN   9781612197838.
  22. 1 2 3 Friedman, Lisa (March 26, 2018). "The E.P.A. Says It Wants Research Transparency. Scientists See an Attack on Science". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved March 23, 2022.

Further reading