History of English grammars

Last updated

The history of English grammars [1] [2] begins late in the sixteenth century with the Pamphlet for Grammar by William Bullokar. In the early works, the structure and rules of English grammar were based on those of Latin. A more modern approach, incorporating phonology, was introduced in the nineteenth century.

Contents

Sixteenth to eighteenth centuries

The first English grammar, Pamphlet for Grammar by William Bullokar, written with the seeming goal of demonstrating that English was quite as rule-bound as Latin, was published in 1586. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Bullokar's grammar was faithfully modelled on William Lily's Latin grammar, Rudimenta Grammatices (1534). [9] Lily's grammar was being used in schools in England at the time, having been "prescribed" for them in 1542 by Henry VIII. [5] Although Bullokar wrote his grammar in English and used a "reformed spelling system" of his own invention, many English grammars, for much of the century after Bullokar's effort, were to be written in Latin; this was especially the case for books whose authors were aiming to be scholarly. [5] Christopher Cooper's Grammatica Linguæ Anglicanæ (1685) was the last English grammar written in Latin. [10]

Latin grammar traditions bore down oppressively on early English grammar writing. Any attempt by one author to assert an independent grammatical rule for English was quickly followed by declarations by others of the truth of the corresponding Latin-based equivalent. [11] As late as the early nineteenth century, Lindley Murray, the author of a widely used grammar, was having to cite "grammatical authorities" to bolster the claim that grammatical cases in English are different from the ones in Ancient Greek or Latin. [11]

The focus on tradition belied the role that other social forces had begun to play in the early seventeenth century. Increasing commerce, and the social changes in its wake, created a new impetus for grammar writing. The greater British role in international trade in the second half of the century created a demand for English grammars among speakers of other languages. Quite a few English grammars were published in European languages.

In Britain, as education and literacy spread in the early eighteenth century, many grammars, such as the several editions of John Brightland's Grammar of the English Tongue and James Greenwood's Essay towards a Practical English Grammar, [12] [13] were written for "non-learned, native-speaker audiences" who did not know the rudiments of Latin. These audiences included women (the "fair sex"), apprentices, merchants, tradesmen, and children. [11] [14]

If by the end of the seventeenth century, English grammar writing had made a modest start, totaling 16 grammars from the time of Bullokar's Pamphlet, by the end of the eighteenth century, a brisk pace had been set with some 270 titles added, [15] though it was less than half that number if later editions were not included; [16] a large proportion were published late in the century, [17] Both publishing and demand were to continue to mushroom. The first half of the nineteenth century would see the appearance of almost 900 new English grammar books. [15] Showing little originality, most took the tack of claiming—as justification for their appearance—that the needs of their particular target audience were still unmet or that a particular "grammatical point" had not been adequately treated in the preexisting texts, or oftentimes both. [15] Texts that aimed to be utilitarian and egalitarian were proliferating. Edward Shelley's The People's Grammar; or English Grammar Without Difficulties for 'the Million' (1848), for example, was written for "the mechanic and hard-working youth, in their solitary struggles for the acquirement of knowledge." [15] William Cobbett's popular mid-century book was titled A Grammar of the English Language, in a Series of Letters: Intended for the Use of Schools and of Young Persons in General, but more especially for the use of Soldiers, Sailors, Apprentices, and Plough-Boys. Ann Fisher published an English grammar in 1745 and some 30 editions after that, making it one of the most popular early English grammars and the first written by a woman. [18]

Eighteenth-century prescriptive grammars


The 18th century saw the emergence of prescriptive grammars in English. A prescriptive grammar refers to a set of norms or rules governing how a language should or should not be used rather than describing the ways in which a language is actually used.

Ann Fisher published 'A New Grammar' in 1745 which was among the earliest in the 18th century.

Robert Lowth, published A Short Introduction to English Grammar, with critical notes (1762), his only work on the subject.

In America in 1765, the Rev. Dr. Samuel Johnson, founder and first president of King's College in New York City (now Columbia University) published An English Grammar; the First Easy Rudiments of Grammar Applied to the English Tongue. It "appears to have been the first English grammar prepared by an American and published in America." [19] In 1767, Johnson combined his grammar with a Hebrew grammar, and published it as An English and Hebrew grammar, being the first short rudiments of those two languages, suggesting the languages be taught together to children. [20] Johnson developed his grammars independently of Lowth, but later corresponded and exchanged grammars with him. [21] English grammar increasingly held great significance for people in the United States with little to no income, and educational backgrounds. Learning the basic principles of grammar helped a cross-section ranging from former slaves to rail splitters and weavers to speak and write with fluency and rise in their careers. [22]

In Britain, the women Ellin Devis, Dorothea Du Bois, Mrs. M. C. Edwards, Mrs. Eves, Ellenor Fenn (aka Mrs. Teachwell and Mrs. Lovechild), Jane Gardiner née Arden, Blanche Mercy, and Mrs. Taylor, published some twelve grammars in the late 18th-century, their books running into many editions over several decades. [23] English grammar was being seen to be important not only for better English writing but also for learning other languages thereafter. [24]

Nineteenth century to present

Modern-language studies became systematized during the nineteenth century. [25] In the case of English, this happened first in continental Europe, where it was studied by historical and comparative linguists. [25] In 1832, Danish philologist Rasmus Rask published an English grammar, Engelsk Formlære, part of his extensive comparative studies in the grammars of Indo-European languages. [25] German philologist Jacob Grimm, the elder of the Brothers Grimm, included English grammar in his monumental grammar of Germanic languages, Deutsche Grammatik (1822–1837). [25] German historical linguist Eduard Adolf Maetzner published his 1,700 page Englische Grammatik between 1860 and 1865; an English translation, An English grammar: methodical, analytical and historical appeared in 1874. [25] Contributing little new to the intrinsic scientific study of English grammar, these works nonetheless showed that English was being studied seriously by the first professional linguists. [25]

As phonology became a full-fledged field, spoken English began to be studied scientifically as well, generating by the end of the nineteenth century an international enterprise investigating the structure of the language. This enterprise comprised scholars at various universities, their students who were training to be teachers of English, and journals publishing new research. [25] All the pieces were in place for new "large-scale English grammars" which combined the disparate approaches of the previous decades. [25] The first work to lay claim to the new scholarship was British linguist Henry Sweet's A new English grammar: logical and historical, published in two parts, Phonology and Accidence (1892) and Syntax (1896), its title suggesting not only continuity and contrast with Maetzner's earlier work, but also kinship with the contemporary A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (begun 1884), later the Oxford English Dictionary (1895). [25] Two other contemporary English grammars were also influential. [26] English Grammar: Past and Present, by John Collinson Nesfield, was originally written for the market in colonial India. It was later expanded to appeal to students in Britain as well, from young men preparing for various professional examinations to students in "Ladies' Colleges." [26] Other books by Nesfield include A Junior Course In English Composition, A Senior Course In English Composition, but it was his A Manual Of English Grammar and Composition that proved to be greatly successful both in Britain and her colonies—so much so that it formed the basis for many other grammar and composition primers including but not limited to Warriner's English Grammar and Composition and High School English Grammar and Composition, casually called Wren & Martin, authored by P. C. Wren and H. Martin. Grammar of spoken English (1924), by H. E. Palmer, written for the teaching and study of English as a foreign language, included a full description of the intonation patterns of English. [26]

The next set of wide-ranging English grammars were written by Danish and Dutch linguists. [27] Danish linguist Otto Jespersen, who had coauthored a few books with Henry Sweet, began work on his seven-volume Modern English grammar on historical principles in the first decade of the twentieth century. [27] The first volume, Sounds and Spellings, was published in 1909; it then took forty years for the remaining volumes on syntax (volumes 2 through 5), morphology (volume 6), and syntax again (volume 7), to be completed. [27] Jespersen's original contribution was in analyzing the various parts of a sentence in terms of categories that he named, rank, junction, and nexus, forgoing the usual word classes. His ideas would inspire the later work of Noam Chomsky and Randolph Quirk. [27]

The Dutch tradition of writing English grammars, which began with Thomas Basson's The Conjugations in Englische and Netherdutche in the same year—1586—as William Bullokar's first English grammar (written in English), gained renewed strength in the early 20th century in the work of three grammarians: Hendrik Poutsma, Etsko Kruisinga, and Reinard Zandvoort. [27] Poutsma's Grammar of late modern English, published between 1904 and 1929 and written for "continental, especially Dutch students," selected all its examples from English literature. [28]

Timeline of important English grammars

See also List of English grammars and grammarians.

See also

Footnotes

    Notes

    1. ↑ Proffitt, Michael, ed. (2023), "2. grammar (noun)", Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.), A treatise or book on grammar. Examples: 1530 'Folowyng the order of Theodorus Gaza, in his grammer of the Greke tonge.' J. Palsgrave, Lesclarcissement Epistle Ded; 1594 'I read it in the Grammer long agoe.' W. Shakespeare, Titus Andronicus iv. ii. 23; ... 1693 'We have yet no English Prosodia, not so much as a tolerable Dictionary, or a Grammar.' J. Dryden, Discourse conc. Satire in J. Dryden et al., translation of Juvenal, Satires; 1751 'We are taught in common Grammars that Verbs Active require an Accusative.' J. Harris, Hermes i. ix. 179.(subscription required)
    2. ↑ Greenbaum, Sidney (1996), Oxford English Grammar, Oxford University Press, p. 23, ISBN   978-0-19-861250-6, The word grammar is used in a number of ways. It may refer to a book, in which case a grammar is analogous to a dictionary. And just as we have many English dictionaries, which vary in the number of their entries and the quality of their definitions, so we have many English grammars (or grammar books), which vary in their coverage and their accuracy. The largest English dictionary is the scholarly twenty-volume Oxford English Dictionary, which traces the history of words and their meanings. Similarly, there are large scholarly grammars, notably the seven-volume Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, published at intervals between 1909 and 1949 and still consulted by scholars, and the more recent Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, published in 1985, that extends to nearly 1,800 pages.
    3. ↑ Aarts, Bas (2011), Oxford Modern English Grammar, Oxford University Press, p. 3, ISBN   978-0-19-953319-0, Many grammars of English were written in Latin up to the middle of the eighteenth century, though William Bullokar's Pamphlet for Grammar (1586), the first grammar of English to be written in English, is an exception.
    4. ↑ Greenbaum, Sidney (1996), Oxford English Grammar, Oxford University Press, p. 37, ISBN   978-0-19-861250-6, The earliest known grammar of English was by William Bullokar, published in 1580 (sic), who wanted to show that English was as capable of grammatical analysis as was Latin.
    5. 1 2 3 Linn 2008 , p. 74
    6. ↑ Considine, John (2022), Sixteenth-Century English Dictionaries, Dictionaries in the English-Speaking World, 1500–1800 series, Oxford University Press, p. 396, ISBN   978-0-19-883228-7, Just as Bullokar's Short introduction had been followed by the Booke at large in 1580, his Pamphlet for grammar appeared in 1586, as an octavo of eighty pages. Intended as a forerunner to a larger grammar which never appeared, it was, even in its abridged form, the first printed grammar of English.
    7. ↑ Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria (2015), Grammar, Rhetoric and Usage in English: Preposition Placement 1500–1900, Studies in English Language series, Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–26, ISBN   978-1-107-00079-7, The production of grammars of English increased dramatically during the second half of the eighteenth century, as Figure 2.1 shows. Publication rates in the early eighteenth century were still modest, following a slow development during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, starting with Willim Bullokar's Bref Grammar for English in 1586.
    8. ↑ Aarts, Bas; Bowie, Jill; Popova, Gergana (2020), "Introduction", in Aarts, Bas; Bowie, Jill; Popova, Gergana (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, Oxford University Press, pp. xxiii–xxiv, ISBN   978-0-19-875510-4, Ever since William Bullokar's Pamphlet for Grammar was published in 1586, countless grammars have been produced, with eighteenth-century authors particularly productive (Linn 2006). Each of these grammars is in many ways unique. Thus while Bullokar (1586:53) opined that English did not have much grammar ('As English hath few and short rules for declining words, so it hath few rules for joining words in sentence or in construction'; cited in Michael 1987:324), other grammarians struggled with the question of how many word classes to recognize.
    9. ↑ Lily 1709, original 1534
    10. ↑ Linn 2008 , p. 74, Dons 2004 , pp. 16–17
    11. 1 2 3 Linn 2008 , p. 75
    12. ↑ Brightland, John (1711). A Grammar of the English Tongue (1 ed.). London: John Brightland.
    13. ↑ Greenwood, James (1711). An Essay towards a Practical English Grammar (1 ed.). London: Samuel Keeble, John Lawrence, Jonah Bowyer, R. & I. Bonwick, and Rob. Halsey.
    14. ↑ Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, ed. (2008). Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    15. 1 2 3 4 Linn 2008 , p. 76
    16. ↑ Greenbaum, Sidney (1996), Oxford English Grammar, Oxford University Press, p. 37, ISBN   978-0-19-861250-6, By 1800, a total of 112 grammars were published, excluding later editions.
    17. ↑ Beal, Joan C. (July 2013). "The place of pronunciation in eighteenth-century grammars of English". Transactions of the Philological Society. 111 (2): 165–178. doi:10.1111/1467-968X.12028.
    18. ↑ Rodríguez-Gil, María Esther (November 2002). "Ann Fisher: first female grammarian". Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics .
    19. ↑ Lyman, Rollo La Verne, English Grammar in American Schools Before 1850, University of Chicago, 1922.
    20. ↑ English Short Title Catalogue, ESTC Citation No. W9287
    21. ↑ Schneider, Herbert and Carol, Samuel Johnson, President of King's College: His Career and Writings, Columbia University Press, 4 vols, 1929, Volume IV, index, p. 385
    22. ↑ Schweiger, Beth Barton (Winter 2010). "A Social History of English Grammar in the Early United States". Journal of the Early Republic. 30 (4): 535. doi:10.1353/jer.2010.a403326. JSTOR   40926064. S2CID   142679875.
    23. ↑ Cajka, Karen (2003). "The forgotten women grammarians of eighteenth-century England". Doctoral Dissertations (Doctoral Dissertations. Paper AAI3118940. ed.). University of Connecticut: 1–298. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
    24. ↑ Hilton, Mary; Shefrin, Jill (2009). Educating the Child in Enlightenment Britain: Beliefs, Cultures, Practices. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 83.
    25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Linn 2008 , pp. 78–79
    26. 1 2 3 Linn 2008 , p. 80
    27. 1 2 3 4 5 Linn 2008 , p. 81
    28. ↑ Linn 2008 , p. 82
    29. ↑ Bullokar 1586a, Bullokar 1586b, Dons 2004 , p. 7
    30. 1 2 3 Dons 2004 , pp. 8–9
    31. 1 2 Dons 2004 , pp. 10–12
    32. ↑ Dons 2004 , pp. 10–12, Jonson 1756, original 1640
    33. 1 2 3 4 Dons 2004 , pp. 13–15
    34. 1 2 3 4 5 Dons 2004 , pp. 16–17
    35. ↑ Fisher 1750, original 1745
    36. ↑ Lowth 1775, original 1762
    37. ↑ Ash 1810, original 1763
    38. ↑ Ward 1765, Ward 1767
    39. ↑ Johnson 1766
    40. ↑ Priestley 1772, Hodson 2008
    41. ↑ Percy, Carol (1994). "Paradigms for their Sex? Women's Grammars in Late Eighteenth-Century England". Histoire Épistemologie Langage. 16: 123.
    42. ↑ DNB 00
    43. ↑ Murray 1809, original 1795, Murray 1838, original 1797
    44. ↑ Michael, Ian (1970). English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    45. ↑ Webster 1804, Webster 1822
    46. ↑ Cobbett 1883, original 1818
    47. ↑ Fowler 1881, original 1850
    48. ↑ Maetzner & Grece 1874a, Maetzner & Grece 1874c, Linn 2008 , p. 79
    49. ↑ Sweet 1900, original 1892, Sweet 1898, Linn 2008 , p. 79
    50. ↑ Poutsma & 1904–1929, Linn 2008 , p. 81
    51. ↑ Kruisinga & 1909–1932, Linn 2008 , p. 82
    52. ↑ Jespersen & 1909–1940
    53. ↑ Curme 1931, Curme 1935
    54. ↑ Zandvoort 1945, Linn 2008 , p. 82
    55. ↑ Fries 1952, Linn 2008 , p. 83
    56. ↑ Halliday 1984
    57. ↑ Quirk et al. 1985
    58. ↑ Biber et al. 1999
    59. ↑ Huddleston & Pullum 2002
    60. ↑ Carter & McCarthy 2006

    Related Research Articles

    In linguistics, grammar is the set of rules for how a natural language is structured, as demonstrated by its speakers or writers. Grammar rules may concern the use of clauses, phrases, and words. The term may also refer to the study of such rules, a subject that includes phonology, morphology, and syntax, together with phonetics, semantics, and pragmatics. There are, broadly speaking, two different ways to study grammar: traditional grammar and theoretical grammar.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Lowth</span> English bishop and grammarian (1710–1787)

    Robert Lowth was a Bishop of Oxford, Bishop of St Davids, Professor of Poetry and the author of one of the most influential textbooks of English grammar.

    In linguistics, syntax is the study of how words and morphemes combine to form larger units such as phrases and sentences. Central concerns of syntax include word order, grammatical relations, hierarchical sentence structure (constituency), agreement, the nature of crosslinguistic variation, and the relationship between form and meaning (semantics). There are numerous approaches to syntax that differ in their central assumptions and goals.

    A split infinitive is a grammatical construction in which an adverb or adverbial phrase separates the "to" and "infinitive" constituents of what was traditionally called the "full infinitive", but is more commonly known in modern linguistics as the to-infinitive. In the history of English language aesthetics, the split infinitive was often deprecated, despite its prevalence in colloquial speech. The opening sequence of the Star Trek television series contains a well-known example, "to boldly go where no man has gone before", wherein the adverb boldly was said to split the full infinitive, to go. Multiple words may split a to-infinitive, such as: "The population is expected to more than double in the next ten years."

    In the study of language, description or descriptive linguistics is the work of objectively analyzing and describing how language is actually used by a speech community.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Generative grammar</span> Research tradition in linguistics

    Generative grammar is a research tradition in linguistics that aims to explain the cognitive basis of language by formulating and testing explicit models of humans' subconscious grammatical knowledge. Generative linguists, or generativists, tend to share certain working assumptions such as the competence–performance distinction and the notion that some domain-specific aspects of grammar are partly innate in humans. These assumptions are rejected in non-generative approaches such as usage-based models of language. Generative linguistics includes work in core areas such as syntax, semantics, phonology, psycholinguistics, and language acquisition, with additional extensions to topics including biolinguistics and music cognition.

    William Bullokar was a 16th-century printer who devised a 40-letter phonetic alphabet for the English language. Its characters were presented in the black-letter or "gothic" writing style commonly used at the time and also in Roman type. Taking as his model a Latin grammar by William Lily, Bullokar wrote the first published grammar of the English language, in a book titled Brief Grammar for English, which appeared in 1586.

    Traditional grammar is a framework for the description of the structure of a language. The roots of traditional grammar are in the work of classical Greek and Latin philologists. The formal study of grammar based on these models became popular during the Renaissance.

    Prescription is the formulation of normative rules for language use. This article discusses the history of prescription in English. For a more general discussion, see linguistic prescription.

    In traditional grammar, a subject complement is a predicative expression that follows a copula, which complements the subject of a clause by means of characterization that completes the meaning of the subject.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">English prepositions</span> Prepositions in the English language

    English prepositions are words – such as of, in, on, at, from, etc. – that function as the head of a prepositional phrase, and most characteristically license a noun phrase object. Semantically, they most typically denote relations in space and time. Morphologically, they are usually simple and do not inflect. They form a closed lexical category.

    A Latin mnemonic verse or mnemonic rhyme is a mnemonic device for teaching and remembering Latin grammar. Such mnemonics have been considered by teachers to be an effective technique for schoolchildren to learn the complex rules of Latin accidence and syntax. One of their earliest uses was in the Doctrinale by Alexander of Villedieu written in 1199 as an entire grammar of the language comprising 2,000 lines of doggerel verse. Various Latin mnemonic verses continued to be used in English schools until the 1950s and 1960s.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">English adverbs</span>

    English adverbs are words such as so, just, how, well, also, very, even, only, really, and why that head adverb phrases, and whose most typical members function as modifiers in verb phrases and clauses, along with adjective and adverb phrases. The category is highly heterogeneous, but a large number of the very typical members are derived from adjectives + the suffix -ly and modify any word, phrase or clause other than a noun. Adverbs form an open lexical category in English. They do not typically license or function as complements in other phrases. Semantically, they are again highly various, denoting manner, degree, duration, frequency, domain, modality, and much more.

    Linguistics is the scientific study of language. The areas of linguistic analysis are syntax, semantics (meaning), morphology, phonetics, phonology, and pragmatics. Subdisciplines such as biolinguistics and psycholinguistics bridge many of these divisions.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Ann Fisher (grammarian)</span> English grammarian (1719–1778)

    Ann Fisher was an English grammarian and successful author of several books. With A New Grammar (1745), she became the first woman to publish on modern English grammar, although Elizabeth Elstob had published a grammar of Anglo-Saxon in 1715. She was also the first woman to publish an English dictionary, and the first grammarian to suggest that masculine pronouns be used generically. Her daughter Sarah inherited and ran The Newcastle Chronicle which she co-founded.

    Ingrid Marijke Tieken-Boon van Ostade is a professor emeritus of English Sociohistorical Linguistics at Leiden University's Centre for Linguistics. She has researched widely in the area of English socio-historical linguistics having looked at such diverse fields as English negations, historical social network analysis, the standardisation process and the language of 18th-century letters. She has recently published a book on Bishop Lowth (1710–1787). Her work on a collaborative project on English usage was featured in the BBC Radio 4's Making History programme.

    Nevile Martin Gwynne is a British writer who has gained recognition and some criticism for his book Gwynne's Grammar. He has also written Gwynne's Latin. In April 2013 a grammar test devised by Gwynne was published by The Daily Telegraph. He spent his early days in Gloucestershire before attending Eton College and Oxford University, graduating with a degree in Modern languages. He later qualified as a Chartered Accountant at the British Institute of Chartered Accountants.

    Ellin Devis, also known as Eilen Devis or Ellin Davis, was a schoolmistress and author of The Accidence (1775), a popular eighteenth-century grammar.

    Inanimate <i>whose</i> English grammatical construction

    The inanimate whose refers to the use in English of the relative pronoun whose with non-personal antecedents, as in: "That's the car whose alarm keeps waking us up at night." The construction is also known as the whose inanimate, non-personal whose, and neuter whose.

    A grammar book is a book or treatise describing the grammar of one or more languages. In linguistics, such a book is itself frequently referred to as a grammar.

    References

    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.