Holli A. Semetko | |
---|---|
Nationality | American |
Alma mater | |
Awards | |
Scientific career | |
Fields | |
Institutions |
Holli Semetko, frequently published as Holli A. Semetko, is a comparative political scientist, currently serving as the Asa Griggs Candler professor of media and international affairs at Emory University. She served as Emory University's Vice Provost for International Affairs, Director of the Office of International Affairs, and the Director of the Claus M. Halle Institute for Global Learning from 2003-13. In a 2019 study on the top 400 most-cited authors in political science, Semetko was named among the top 40 most cited women in political science. Semetko's current research focuses on social media, campaigning and influence, political communication, public opinion, and political campaigns in comparative perspective. She currently serves as Conference Chair for the 2023 annual meetings of the World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) in Salzburg, Austria, see the call for abstracts here: https://wapor.org/events/annual-conference/current-conference/
Semetko was born in Trenton, Michigan. [1] She graduated from Albion College with a BA in both political science and economics. [1] Semetko earned an MSc in political sociology from the London School of Economics and Political Science, followed by a PhD. [1] [2] Semetko's dissertation won the 1989 Samuel H. Beer Dissertation Prize, [3] which is awarded by the British Politics Group "to reward exceptional work" in the area of British politics. [4] In May 2013, she was awarded an executive MBA from the Goizueta Business School at Emory University. [5]
In 1994, Semetko was a research fellow at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University. [6] She then joined the faculty at Syracuse University, and in 1995 she moved to The University of Amsterdam, to serve as Professor and Chair of Audience and Public Opinion Research, then Chair of the Department of Communication Science and founding board chair of the Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR). [7] Semetko moved to Emory University in 2003. [7]
In addition to publishing several dozen journal articles, Semetko has written or edited a number of books in comparative politics and political communication. In 1999, she coauthored the book On message: Communicating the campaign with Pippa Norris, John Curtice, David Sanders, and Margaret Scammell. The book uses the 1997 United Kingdom general election as a case to study the role of campaigning and political media in election outcomes. The book used a variety of methodologies to study that campaign, prompting Shanto Iyengar to write: "At last, a genuinely multi-method study of political campaigning". [8]
In 1991, Semetko coauthored the comparative study of the 1984 United States presidential election and the 1983 United Kingdom general election, The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. [9] Doris Graber reviewed this book as "a path-breaking, major work", [10] with Ann N. Crigler writing in the American Political Science Review that it is "a well-researched and clearly written piece of scholarship that advances knowledge about the transactional relationships between the institutions of the press and politics". [9] Among her other books, Semetko co-edited, with Margaret Scammell, The Sage Handbook of Political Communication. [7]
Semetko received the 1992 Robert M. Worcester Prize which is given by the World Association for Public Opinion Research to the best article in the International Journal of Public Opinion Research , for an article that she coauthored with Joanne Bay Brzinski, David Weaver, and Lars Willnat. [11] Her article with Kees Aarts, titled "The Divided Electorate: Effects of Media Use on Political Involvement" and published in The Journal of Politics , received the 2003 Kaid-Sanders Award for Best Political Communication Article of the Year from the Political Communication section of the American Political Science Association. [12]
In 2019, a citation analysis by the political scientists Hannah June Kim and Bernard Grofman listed Semetko among the top 40 most cited women working as a political scientist at an American university. [2]
From 2003 to 2013, Semetko was the Director of the Claus M. Halle Institute for Global Learning. [13] At the end of her tenure as Director, then-Provost Earl Lewis wrote that the "Halle Institute's visibility, its programs and partnership, affiliated faculty and publications, have grown significantly under Dr. Semetko's creative leadership", citing the examples of her creation of an Emory-Nanjing Visiting Scholars Program and expanding various opportunities for Halle Institute scholars to conduct research abroad. [13] Semetko has also been the Vice-Provost for International Affairs at Emory University, [14] and the Director of the Office of International Affairs there. [15]
In 2011, Semetko was elected as a life member to the Council on Foreign Relations. [16] [17] Semetko has also been a visiting scholar and a Fulbright scholar at IIT-Bombay Indian Institutes of Technology. [7] [5]
A political campaign is an organized effort which seeks to influence the decision making progress within a specific group. In democracies, political campaigns often refer to electoral campaigns, by which representatives are chosen or referendums are decided. In modern politics, the most high-profile political campaigns are focused on general elections and candidates for head of state or head of government, often a president or prime minister.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson is an American professor of communication and the director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. She co-founded FactCheck.org, and she is an author, most recently of Cyberwar, in which she argues that Russia very likely helped Donald J. Trump become the U.S. President in 2016.
Sir Robert Milton Worcester, is an American-born British pollster who is the founder of MORI and a member and contributor to many voluntary organisations. He is a well-known figure in British public opinion research and political circles and as a media commentator, especially about voting intentions in British and American elections.
Claims of media bias have increased in the United States as the two-party system has become more polarized, including claims of liberal and conservative bias. The bias generally manifests through media outlets skewing information, such as reporting news in a way that conflicts with standards of professional journalism, or promoting a political agenda through entertainment media. There is also bias in reporting to favor the corporate owners, and mainstream bias, a tendency of the media to focus on certain "hot" stories and ignore news of more substance. A variety of watchdog groups attempt to combat bias by fact-checking biased reporting and also unfounded claims of bias. Researchers in a variety of scholarly disciplines study media bias.
The World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) is an international professional association of researchers in the field of survey research. It is a member organization of the International Science Council.
Jay G Blumler was an American-British theorist of communication and media. He was Professor of Public Communication at the University of Leeds.
ANC Today is a weekly web-based newsletter published by the African National Congress (ANC). It consists mainly of updates on current programmes and initiatives of the ANC.
The International Journal of Public Opinion Research (IJPOR) is a quarterly social science journal sponsored by the World Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) and published by Oxford University Press.
Michael Wolfe Traugott is an American political scientist, communication studies researcher, and political pundit. As of 2022, he is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and a researcher at UM's Institute for Social Research.
Pippa Norris is a political scientist specializing in comparative politics. She is the McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and she has served as the Australian Laureate Fellow and Professor of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney, and Director of the Electoral Integrity Project.
Jason Johnson is an American political scientist, commentator and writer. He is the author of the book Political Consultants and Campaigns: One Day to Sell. Johnson is an associate professor of communication and journalism at Morgan State University. He is a regular political contributor to MSNBC and CNN.
John Maxwell Hamilton is a journalist, public servant, and educator. He is the Hopkins P. Breazeale Professor in the Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University, and a Global Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C.
Comparative election campaign communication research examines how and with what effect election campaigns are conducted in a temporal or spatial comparative approach. Therefore, it focuses on three interrelated dimensions: politics, media and electorate. Spatial comparative election communication research investigates campaign practices, its media responses and its effects on the electorate in different countries.
Cornelis Wilhelmus Maria Antonia (Kees) Aarts is a Dutch political scientist and Professor of Political Science at the Department of Public Administration (PA) of the University of Twente, particularly known for his work on comparative electoral behavior.
Social media played an important role in shaping the course of events leading up to, during, and after the 2016 United States presidential election. It enabled people to have a greater interaction with the political climate, controversies, and news surrounding the candidates. Unlike traditional news platforms, such as newspapers, radio, and magazines, social media gave people the ability to comment below a candidate's advertisement, news surrounding the candidates, or articles regarding the policy of the candidates. It also allowed people to formulate their own opinions on public forums and sites and allowed for greater interaction among voters. The accessibility of information online enabled more voters to educate themselves on candidates' positions on issues, which in turn enabled them to form unique opinions on candidates and vote on those opinions, ultimately impacting the election's outcome.
Jane Green is a British political scientist and academic. She is Professor of Political Science and British Politics at the University of Oxford and a professorial fellow of Nuffield College. She is a specialist in public opinion and electoral behaviour, and has co-directed the British Election Study.
Claes Holger de Vreese is a Danish Professor of Political Communication at the Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) at the department of Communication Science at the University of Amsterdam (UvA). In addition, he is Affiliated Professor of Political Science and Journalism at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU). De Vreese is the founding Director of the Center for Politics and Communication. He is member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and the chair of its Social Science Council. Between 2005 and 2013, he was the Director of ASCoR and the Director of the Netherlands School of Communication Research (NeSCoR).
Doris Appel Graber was an American political scientist.
Elections to the European Parliament saw declining voter turnout between 1979 and 2014. However, voter turnout in 2019 European elections increased by 8 points compared to 2014. In spite of this exception for all Member States, the electoral mobilization remains weak compared to the national parliamentary elections. Moreover, turnout significantly differs from one country to another in Europe and across a time: in 2019 Belgium citizens participated the most with 88.47% and Slovakians the less with 22.74%. The potential factors that might influence these trends and their implications have attracted great scholarly attention. Identifying and analysing the factors that determine the relative low turnout at European elections is therefore critical, as it is one element that weakens the democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament.