I-III-VI semiconductors

Last updated

I-III-VI2 semiconductors are solid semiconducting materials that contain three or more chemical elements belonging to groups I, III and VI (IUPAC groups 1/11, 13 and 16) of the periodic table. They usually involve two metals and one chalcogen. Some of these materials have a direct bandgap, Eg, of approximately 1.5 eV, which makes them efficient absorbers of sunlight and thus potential solar cell materials. A fourth element is often added to a I-III-VI2 material to tune the bandgap for maximum solar cell efficiency. A representative example is copper indium gallium selenide (CuInxGa(1–x)Se2, Eg = 1.7–1.0 eV for x = 0–1 [1] ), which is used in copper indium gallium selenide solar cells.

Contents

Optical absorption spectrum of b-CuGaO2 powder (top left inset) obtained from diffuse reflection measurements. The right inset shows the Shockley-Queisser limit for the efficiency of a single-junction solar cell under unconcentrated sunlight. Beta-CuGaO2.png
Optical absorption spectrum of β-CuGaO2 powder (top left inset) obtained from diffuse reflection measurements. The right inset shows the Shockley-Queisser limit for the efficiency of a single-junction solar cell under unconcentrated sunlight.

CuGaO2

CuGaO2 exists in two main polymorphs, α and β. The α form has the delafossite crystal structure and can be prepared by reacting Cu2O with Ga2O3 at high temperatures. The β form has a wurtzite-like crystal structure (space group Pna21); it is metastable, but exhibits a long-term stability at temperatures below 300 °C. [3] It can be obtained by an ion exchange of Na+ ions in a β-NaGaO2 precursor with Cu+ ions in CuCl under vacuum, to avoid the oxidation of Cu+ to Cu2+. [2]

Unlike most I-III-VI2 oxides, which are transparent, electrically insulating solids with a bandgap above 2 eV, β-CuGaO2 has a direct bandgap of 1.47 eV, which is favorable for solar cell applications. In contrast, β-AgGaO2 and β-AgAlO2 have an indirect bandgap. Undoped β-CuGaO2 is a p-type semiconductor. [2]

AgGaO2 and AgAlO2

Bandgap in AgGaO2-ZnO and CdO-ZnO alloys. Beta-AgGaO2-bandgap.png
Bandgap in AgGaO2-ZnO and CdO-ZnO alloys.

Similarly to CuGaO2, α-AgGaO2 and α-AgAlO2 have the delafossite crystal structure while the structure of the corresponding β phases is similar to wurtzite (space group Pna2a). β-AgGaO2 is metastable and can be synthesized by ion exchange with a β-NaGaO2 precursor. The bandgaps of β-AgGaO2 and β-AgAlO2 (2.2 and 2.8 eV respectively) are indirect; they fall into the visible range and can be tuned by alloying with ZnO. For this reason, both materials are hardly suitable for solar cells, but have potential applications in photocatalysis. [2]

Contrary to LiGaO2, AgGaO2 can not be alloyed with ZnO by heating their mixture because of the Ag+ reduction to metallic silver; therefore, magnetron sputtering of AgGaO2 and ZnO targets is used instead. [2]

LiGaO2 and LiGaTe2

Bandgap in LiGaO2-ZnO alloys. Beta-LiGaO2-bandgap.png
Bandgap in LiGaO2-ZnO alloys.
LiGaTe2 crystal LiGaTe2 crystal.jpg
LiGaTe2 crystal
LiGaTe2 crystal structure LiGaTe2 structure.jpg
LiGaTe2 crystal structure

Pure single crystals of β-LiGaO2 with a length of several inches can be grown by the Czochralski method. Their cleaved surfaces have lattice constants that match those of ZnO and GaN and are therefore suitable for epitaxial growth of thin films of those materials. β-LiGaO2 is a potential nonlinear optics material, but its direct bandgap of 5.6 eV is too wide for visible light applications. It can be reduced down to 3.2 eV by alloying β-LiGaO2 with ZnO. The bandgap tuning is discontinuous because ZnO and β-LiGaO2 do not mix but form a Zn2LiGaO4 phase when their ratio is between ca. 0.2 and 1. [2]

LiGaTe2 crystals with a size up to 5 mm can be grown in three steps. First, Li, Ga, and Te elements are fused in an evacuated quartz ampoule at 1250 K for 24 hours. At this stage Li reacts with the ampoule walls, releasing heat, and is partly consumed. In the second stage, the melt is homogenized in a sealed quartz ampoule, which is coated inside with pyrolytic carbon to reduce Li reactivity. The homogenization temperature is selected ca. 50 K above the melting point of LiGaTe2. The crystals are then grown from the homogenized melt by the Bridgman–Stockbarger technique in a two-zone furnace. The temperature at the start of crystallization is a few degrees below the LiGaTe2 melting point. The ampoule is moved the cold zone at a rate of 2.5 mm/day for 20 days. [4]

Room-temperature properties of I-III-VI2 semiconductors [5]
Formulaa (Å)b (Å)c (Å) Space group Density
(g/cm3)
Melting point
(K)
Bandgap
(eV)
α-LiGaO2 [6] 2.922.9214.45R3m5.07m5.6d
β-LiGaO2 [7] 5.4066.3795.013Pna214.18m5.6d
LiGaSe2 [4] Pna21
LiGaTe2 [4] 6.33757(2)6.33757(2)11.70095(5)I43d940 [8] 2.41
LiInTe2 [9] 6.3986.39812.46I42d4.911.5 [4]
CuAlS25.3235.32310.44I42d3.4725002.5
CuAlSe25.6175.61710.92I42d4.7022602.67
CuAlTe25.9765.97611.80I42d5.5025500.88
β-CuGaO2 [3] 5.46004(1)6.61013(2)5. 27417(1)Pna21m1.47d
CuGaS25.3605.36010.49I42d4.3523002.38
CuGaSe2 5.6185.61811.01I42d5.5619700.96; 1.63
CuGaTe26.0136.01311.93I42d5.9924000.82; 1.0
CuInS25.5285.52811.08I42d4.7514001.2
CuInSe2 5.7855.78511.56I42d5.7716000.86; 0.92
CuInTe26.1796.17912.365I42d6.1016600.95
CuTlS25.585.5811.17I42d6.32
CuTlSe25.8445.84411.65I42d7.119001.07
CuFeO2 3.0353.03517.166R3m5.52
CuFeS2 5.295.2910.32I42d4.08811350.53
CuFeSe2 [10] 5.5445.54411.076P42c5.418500.16
CuLaS25.655.6510.86I42d
β-AgAlO2m2.8i
AgAlS25.7075.70710.28I42d3.94
AgAlSe25.9865.98610.77I42d5.0712200.7
AgAlTe26.3096.30911.85I42d6.1810000.56
α-AgGaO2P63mc4.12d [11]
β-AgGaO2Pna2am2.2i
AgGaS25.7555.75510.28I42d4.721.66
AgGaSe25.9855.98510.90I42d5.8411201.1
AgGaTe26.3016.30111.96I42d6.059901.32 [4]
AgInS25.8285.82811.19I42d5.001.18
AgInSe26.1026.10211.69I42d5.8110530.96; 0.52
AgInTe26.426.4212.59I42d6.129651.03 [4]
AgFeS25.665.6610.30I42d4.530.88 [12]

See also

References

  1. Tinoco, T.; Rincón, C.; Quintero, M.; Pérez, G. S. N. (1991). "Phase Diagram and Optical Energy Gaps for CuInyGa1−ySe2 Alloys". Physica Status Solidi A. 124 (2): 427–434. Bibcode:1991PSSAR.124..427T. doi:10.1002/pssa.2211240206.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Omata, T.; Nagatani, H.; Suzuki, I.; Kita, M. (2015). "Wurtzite-derived ternary I–III–O2 semiconductors". Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 16 (2) 024902. Bibcode:2015STAdM..16b4902O. doi:10.1088/1468-6996/16/2/024902. PMC   5036475 . PMID   27877769. Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  3. 1 2 Nagatani, H.; Suzuki, I.; Kita, M.; Tanaka, M.; Katsuya, Y.; Sakata, O.; Miyoshi, S.; Yamaguchi, S.; Omata, T. (2015). "Structural and Thermal Properties of Ternary Narrow-Gap Oxide Semiconductor; Wurtzite-Derived β-CuGaO2". Inorganic Chemistry. 54 (4): 1698–704. doi:10.1021/ic502659e. PMID   25651414.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Atuchin, V. V.; Liang, Fei; Grazhdannikov, S.; Isaenko, L. I.; Krinitsin, P. G.; Molokeev, M. S.; Prosvirin, I. P.; Jiang, Xingxing; Lin, Zheshuai (2018). "Negative thermal expansion and electronic structure variation of chalcopyrite type LiGaTe2". RSC Advances. 8 (18): 9946–9955. Bibcode:2018RSCAd...8.9946A. doi: 10.1039/c8ra01079j . PMC   9078859 . PMID   35540803.
  5. Haynes, William M., ed. (2011). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (92nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. pp. 12.82 and 12.87. ISBN   1-4398-5511-0.
  6. Hoppe, R. (1965) Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1115–1121
  7. Konovalova E.A., Tomilov N.P. (1987) Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 32, 1785–1787
  8. Vasilyeva, Inga G.; Nikolaev, Ruslan E.; Krinitsin, Pavel G.; Isaenko, Ludmila I. (2017). "Phase Transitions of Nonlinear Optical LiGaTe2 Crystals before and after Melting". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 121 (32): 17429–17435. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04962.
  9. Hönle, W.; Kühn, G.; Neumann, H. (1986). "Die KristallStruktur von LiInTe2". Zeitschrift für anorganische Chemie. 532: 150–156. doi:10.1002/zaac.19865320121.
  10. Woolley, J.C.; Lamarche, A.-M.; Lamarche, G.; Brun Del Re, R.; Quintero, M.; Gonzalez-Jimenez, F.; Swainson, I.P.; Holden, T.M. (1996). "Low temperature magnetic behaviour of CuFeSe2 from neutron diffraction data". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 164 (1–2): 154–162. Bibcode:1996JMMM..164..154W. doi:10.1016/S0304-8853(96)00365-4.
  11. Vanaja, K. A.; Ajimsha, R. S.; Asha, A. S.; Rajeevkumar, K.; Jayaraj, M. K. (2008). "Pulsed laser deposition of p-type α-AgGaO2 thin films". Thin Solid Films. 516 (7): 1426–1430. Bibcode:2008TSF...516.1426V. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2007.07.207.
  12. Sciacca, B.; Yalcin, A. O.; Garnett, E. C. (2015). "Transformation of Ag Nanowires into Semiconducting AgFeS2 Nanowires". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 137 (13): 4340–4343. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b02051. PMID   25811079. S2CID   207154477.