Imperieuse-class cruiser

Last updated

Hms-warspite-1884.jpg
Class overview
NameImperieuse class
OperatorsNaval ensign of the United Kingdom.svg  Royal Navy
Preceded by Nelson class
Succeeded by Orlando class
Built1881–1886
In commission1886–1905
Completed2
Scrapped2
General characteristics
Type Armoured cruiser
Displacement8,400 tons
Length315 ft (96 m)
Beam62 ft (19 m)
Draught26 ft 9 in (8.15 m)
Installed power8,000 indicated horsepower (6,000 kW)
Propulsion
  • Coal-fired steam, twelve boilers.
  • Two shafts with three-cylinder inverted compound reciprocating engines.
Speed16 knots (30 km/h)
Range6,500 nautical miles (12,000 km) at 10 kn (19 km/h)
Complement555
Armament
Armour

The Imperieuse-class cruiser was a class of two armoured cruisers launched between 1883 and 1884 for the Royal Navy.

Contents

Description

Starboard elevation and deck plan, from Brassey's naval annual 1888-9 Imperieuse Class Right Elevation and Deck Plan.jpg
Starboard elevation and deck plan, from Brassey's naval annual 1888-9
HMS Imperieuse in 1896 showing the later single central pole mast HMS Imperieuse 1896 IWM Q 21375.jpg
HMS Imperieuse in 1896 showing the later single central pole mast

In an 1886 magazine article, [1] Sir Edward Reed complained that these ships did not deserve to be called "armoured", as they were not armoured at bow or stern, only along the middle 140 feet (43 m) of each side. This armour belt was additionally only 8 feet (2.4 m) wide, and as designed would have extended 3 feet 3 inches (0.99 m) above the waterline. As completed, the two ships were overweight, with the result that the belt was completely submerged, leaving them armoured in name only.

The layout of the main armament was unusual for the time, having one gun each forward and aft, and another gun mounted on either beam – in a lozenge arrangement similar to that employed by the French. The original secondary battery comprised ten 6-inch (152mm) guns, but the overweight condition of these ships forced the elimination of four of these weapons.

Intended for prolonged deployments on distant foreign stations, the ships were sheathed with wood and copper to prevent marine growth on the hull, and were originally fitted with a brig sailing rig to economize on coal. After trials showed them to be sluggish under sail, the masts and yards were removed and replaced by a single pole mast between the funnels. This reduction in rig and the weight saved thereby allowed the reinstallation of two 6-inch guns, for a total of eight.

Ships

Building programme

The following table gives the build details and purchase cost of the members of the Imperieuse class. Standard British practice at that time was for these costs to exclude armament and stores. [2] In the table:

ShipBuilderMaker
of
Engines
Date ofCost according to
Laid DownLaunchCompletion(BNA 1895) [4] (BNA 1903) [5] Parkes [6]
HullMachineryTotal
excluding
armament
Imperieuse Portsmouth DockyardMaudslay10 Aug 188118 Dec 1883Sep 1886£417,437£113,377£530,814Details of cost
incomplete
£543,758
Warspite Chatham DockyardPenn25 Oct 188129 Jan 1884Jun 1888£415,546£113,786£529,332£653,072£538,797

Notes

  1. Sir Edward Reed, "The British Navy", Harper's Monthly Magazine (European edition), February 1886
  2. Note that the costs quoted in the 1895 edition and the 1903 edition are not the same. There seems to have been a revision of the costs quoted for British warships in The Naval Annual between the 1902 and 1903 editions, and a further revision between the 1905 and 1906 editions. (The 1906 edition costs cannot be quoted for the Imperieuse class because the class is not listed in the 1906 edition.)
  3. The Naval Annual 1895, p192-200
  4. The Naval Annual 1895, p192-200
  5. The Naval Annual 1903, p236-243
  6. Parkes, Oscar, British Battleships, p307-313.

References