Indian National Army in Singapore

Last updated

The Indian National Army (INA) was a Japanese sponsored Indian military wing in Southeast Asia during the World War II, particularly active in Singapore, [1] that was officially formed in April 1942 and disbanded in August 1945. [2] [1] [3] It was formed with the help of the Japanese forces and was made up of roughly about 45 000 Indian prisoner of war (POWs) of British Indian Army, who were captured after the fall of Singapore on 15 February 1942. [1] It was initially formed by Rash Behari Bose who headed it till April 1942 before handing the lead of INA over to Subhas Chandra Bose in 1943. [2] [4] [1]

Contents

INA was involved in various military operations fighting under the command of the Japanese forces against the British and Allied forces. They are notable for their contributions to the battle fought in Burma, Imphal and Kohima. [2]

Following the defeat of the Japanese, the INA was dissolved in August 1945. The British Raj, never seriously threatened by the INA, charged 300 INA officers with treason in the INA trials, but eventually backtracked in the face of opposition by the Congress. [5] [6] These trials became a galvanising point in the Indian Independence movement for the Indian National Congress. [7] [8] A number of people associated with the INA during the war later went on to hold important roles in public life in India as well as in other countries in Southeast Asia, most notably Lakshmi Sehgal in India, and John Thivy and Janaki Athinahappan in Malaya. [4]

Background and Context

Mahatma Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement

One of the more significant independent movements which brought together hundreds of thousands of Indians was Mahatma Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement between 1920 and 1922 which aimed to reject British rule through non-violent means such as boycotting British products and consuming only local products. [9] This movement also strengthened nationalistic feelings amongst the Indian population both in India as well as other parts of the world. As a result of this movement Gandhi was arrested and he spent two years in jail. [9] However, the effects of this movement were far reaching as it spurred the emergence of a newer generation of Indians from the Congress Party such as, Jawaharlal Nehru, C. Rajagopalachari and Subhas Chandra Bose (who would eventually become the leader of the INA) who would later on actively advocate for India's independence. [10]

Pre-1942 Conditions in Singapore and Malaya

In 1941, with the impending arrival of the Japanese troops to the Malay Peninsula during the World War II, the British government had begun sending a large number of Indian troops to the Malay Peninsula and Singapore. [1] It was estimated that were some 37 000 Indian troops stationed in these areas, making up roughly about the 40 percent of the total military strength of the British forces. [1] However, the British-Indian troops stationed begun to experience various problems.

Firstly, the British military was beginning to be spread too thinly and they were unable to allocate much of their resources to the military set up in the Malay Peninsula and Singapore. [1] Secondly, although it appears that the number British-Indian troops swelled from 200,000 to 900,000 between 1939 and 1941, it was made up of very young boys (as a result of the open recruitment policy of the British) who had very little or no combat training and experience, leading to anxiety amongst the British-Indian forces. [11] [1]

Thirdly, the British had already begun to suspect that not all of their Indian Army personnel were loyal to them. This was largely because, towards the end of 1942, the British government had to resort to indiscriminate recruitment in order to maintain the numbers for its army, meaning that it was no longer carefully curating its selection for the armed forces and consequently the British Indian Army was no longer filled with single minded individuals fighting for the same cause. The antagonistic feeling towards the British amongst the Indian soldiers were due to numerous instances of poor treatment they received. By 1941, significant discontent at the abusive attitudes of their British officers was widespread among Indian soldiers. [1]

As such, due to a combination of the above-mentioned factors and conditions, by 1941, the morale of the Indian Army troops was very low and this set up the stage for many soldiers to switch loyalties to the Japanese in 1942. [2] [11]

The Role of the Japanese in the formation of the INA

The circumstances leading up to the formation of the INA have been contested. While some scholars have gone down the nationalistic road, newer scholars have instead challenged these claims and with the aid of new sources been able to shed a different light on the same event. Early accounts trace the founding of the INA to the spontaneous uprising of nationalism among Indian troops in Malaya. [12] More recent accounts, however, suggest the Japanese played a central role in its formation and development. [1] [4] [2]

Plans by the Japanese forces to influence the British-Indian soldiers in Singapore and Malaya had begun as early September 1941. [1] [11] Major Iwaichi Fujiwara was the officer assigned by the Japanese government to head to Bangkok to undertake efforts to “engage in intelligence operations intended to cultivate...Japanese Indian cooperation”. As the first step in his efforts, Major Fujiwara sought out the highly popular but controversial Indian Nationalist, Pritam Singh who had fled from India to avoid arrest by the British government. Pritam Singh was also the General Secretary of the Indian Independence League (IIL) in Thailand, as part of a larger anti-British political organization which operated in various parts of Southeast Asia.

Fujiwara and Pritam held a series of secret discussions during the months of October and November 1941. During these meetings, Pritam managed to convince Fujiwara that the loyalties of the British Indian soldiers could only be attained if the Japanese authorities would promise the future prisoners of war the sparring of their lives. [1] Additionally, Pritam also persuaded Fujiwara to assure the British-Indian soldiers that the Japanese forces would assist the Indians in gaining independence from British colonial rule. Major Fujiwara guaranteed Pritam Singh that they did not harbour any “political, economic, cultural or religious” [11] intentions in India and they would respect the “property and freedom of Indians in territory that came under the sway of the Japanese”. [11]

Following that, Pritam Singh and Major Fujiwara followed the movement of the Japanese troops during their journey from Southern Thailand to Malaya. [3] As they advanced towards Northern Malaya in December 1941, the Japanese forces were able to capture British-Indian soldiers from the 1/14 Punjab regiment and their leader Mohan Singh who would go on to lead the INA later. Mohan Singh was tasked by Fujiwara to “manage the POWs and to maintain law and order in the area”. [11] During this period, Fujiwara was greatly convinced by Mohan Singh's leadership abilities and as such sought Mohan Singh's compliance to aid the Japanese efforts. He also offered Mohan Singh the opportunity to captain this new Indian army . [4]

Although, initially conflicted as he had heard horrific stories about the torture tactics employed by the Japanese forces, Mohan Singh believed that the proposed new Indian armed forces and cooperation with the Japanese forces, would act as a defence mechanism for “Indian soldiers and to protect Indian civilians and property from Japanese exploitation”. [4] As such, Mohan Singh was inclined to agree to Fujiwara's proposal, on the strict condition that Fujiwara agreed to five conditions dictated by Singh. These conditions were:

1. Full assistance and collaboration would be extended by the Japanese army in the formation of liberation army for India.

2. The present IIL and INA should not be conflated with each other and be allowed to exist separately.

3. The POWs should come solely under the purview of Mohan Singh.

4. Indian POWs should be offered a choice about whether they wanted to join the INA and POWs who refuse should not be subjected to any form of torture by the Japanese forces.

5. The soon to be formed INA should be treated as an ‘allied army’ by the Japanese forces. [11]

Fujiwara acceded to Singh's request. [11] Consequently, Mohan Singh was told to immediately head a propaganda movement in order to convince British-Indian soldiers to join the newly formed INA. By January 1942, this propaganda movement led by Mohan Singh was in full force.

Establishing the INA

The Farrer Park Meeting

It was during the Farrer Park Meeting on 17 February 1942, that Fujiwara and Mohan Singh first addressed the 45 000 strong British-Indian POWs. Major Fujiwara assured the POWs that they would be treated as comrades as opposed to POWs. He also repeatedly assured the POWs that if they complied with the Japanese forces, they would be provided with the support and resources to fight against the British forces and clinch independence for India. [11] [1] Fujiwara had hoped that appealing to the nationalistic consciousness and patriotic feelings of these soldiers would enable him to win their support. Despite Fujiwara's impassioned plea, many of the POWs remained unconvinced. [4] [1] It was only when the charismatic Mohan Singh addressed them next, urging them to “seize the opportunity and rise for the motherland” [13] that the POWs begun to seriously consider the proposal to join the INA.

Although the POWs were not coerced into making an immediate decision with regard to joining the INA, the general consensus was that many of the POWs with the exceptions of the higher ranking British officials and the Gurkha contingent were sufficiently convinced. [14] [1]

Treatment of the Indians under the Early Japanese Rule

It would not be until 9 May 1942 that the INA would come into full effect. However, following the events of 17 February 1942 Farrer Park meeting, the Indians in Singapore begun to enjoy special privileges during the Japanese ‘pacification’ of Singapore . [1] This was clearly seen in the vastly different ways in which the Japanese treated the Indians and Chinese. During these early months, it was reported that roughly 50 000 Chinese in Singapore and the Malayan Peninsula were brutally killed in what is now known as the ‘Sook Ching Massacre’ . [15] In contrast, the Indians received far more lenient treatment. [16] However, this is not to say that the Indians felt no fear at all. In fact, the attitudes of the Japanese forces towards the Chinese population did instill some fear in the general Indian civilian population as well as leaders such as Pritam Singh. This was significant for the Indian leaders, during the Farrer Park meeting who had expressed reservations about collaborating with the Japanese as these incidents further cemented their initial beliefs about the cruel nature of the Japanese and would further affirm their decision to not join the INA in May 1942. [1]

Pledging Allegiance to the INA

First Indian National Army formed by General Mohan Singh

Prior to the arrival of Subhash Chandra Bose in Singapore in July 1943, the Indian POW were recruited by the Mohan Singh for the cause of an independent India, it was called the First Indian National Army. [17]

In the months following the Farrer Park meeting and the eventual formation of the INA in May 1942, Indian and Japanese leaders held various meetings with the most notable one held in Tokyo between 28 March 1942 and 30 March 1942. [17] It was during this meeting that Indian leaders carefully negotiated the terms of the INA with the Japanese officials. It was during these series of meetings that Mohan Singh was officially appointed as Commander in Chief for the INA. [1]

The ‘Bidadari Resolutions’ negotiated between Mohan and other senior Indian officials was formalized on 27 April 1942. [17] These resolutions mandated that the official recruitment for the INA could begin on 8 May 1942 . [1] [18] Mohan Singh continued his attempts to convince the Indian POWs to join the INA. He was rather successful as by September 1942, he was able to recruit more than 40 000 soldiers. [18] Even though it was initially largely believed that many POWs joined the INA because of a burst of nationalistic consciousness, in recent years, it has been uncovered through the reading of other court documents and previously classified government documents [2] that there were other compelling reasons such as anger towards the British officials, the perceived sense of security offered by the Japanese in exchange for the loyalty of the POWs and also the promise of escape from malnutrition and starvation . [2] [1]

The vast difference in treatments provided to those who joined the INA and those who refused further prompted those who initially did not wish to join to change their minds. The Indian POWs who aligned themselves with the INA were often well fed and given simpler, less taxing duties to perform. They were given great amounts of freedom in these camps (termed as volunteer camps) and were entitled to various forms of entertainment such as “patriotic theatrical and song nights that were also used as instruments to get POWs to join the INA”. [19] In a blatant violation of the conditions set by Mohan Singh prior to the formation of the INA, which would later serve as a source of conflict between Singh and the Japanese forces, the POWs who chose to not join the INA were subject to great physical and mental torture as they were sent to ‘concentration camps’, where they were deprived of food, medical aid and other basic rights. [20] An excerpt from Bryon Farewell details some of the methods and techniques that the Japanese used to coerce the Indian POWs into join the INA.

“When none of the Singapore prisoners of 2/2nd or the 2/9th Gurkhas signed up for the I.N.A., their Gurkha officers and N.C.O.s were taken away to Skeleton Camp for intensive coercion.… Twenty-six were selected for brutal treatment, then returned to camp ‘to think again’… [Gurkha officers] were made to work at heavy tasks, clubbed with rifle butts, brutally beaten with poles, and sand was mixed with their food.… Subadar- Major Chethabahadur of the 2/9th was put in a small cage, starved, left for long periods in solitary confinement and beaten…. Subadar-Major Harisung Bohra of the 2/2nd was blinded and repeatedly beaten with bamboo poles; he died of internal hemorrhages.”. [14]

To further complicate matters, it was not just the Japanese who were engaged in torturing the Indian POWs. There have been various reports suggesting that the INA formed its own version of the much feared Japanese Kempeitai which employed various torturous measures in order to coerce the POWs to join the INA. [1]

Arrival of Bose and formation of INA

When Subhas Chandra Bose arrived in Singapore in July 1943 to materialise the goal of an independent India, and he mobilised the Indian manpower including civilians and financial resources in East and South-East Asia. He gave instructions that no coercion should be used in recruitment. First Indian National Army raised by Mohan Singh became part of the Second Indian National Army led by Bose. The combined force was simply called the Indian National Army (INA). [21]

21 October 1943: proclamation of Free India at Cathay Building in Singapore

The Cathay Building Cinema in 1945 where Free India was proclaimed on 21 October 1943. The Cathay Theatre in Singapore 1945.jpg
The Cathay Building Cinema in 1945 where Free India was proclaimed on 21 October 1943.

On 21 October 1943, Subhas Chandra Bose proclaimed the formation of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind (Free India) at Cathay Building with himself as the Head of State, Prime Minister and Minister of War. [22] The Japanese utilised the building to broadcast propaganda in the Japanese language. [23] This government was recognised by several nations and went on to capture India's Andaman and Nicobar Islands from the British colonial rule.

In the name of God, in the name of bygone generations who have welded the Indian people into one nation, and in the name of the dead heroes who have bequeathed to us a tradition of heroism and self-sacrifice we call upon the Indian people to rally round our banner and strike for India's freedom. We call upon them to launch the final struggle against the British and their allies in India and to prosecute that struggle with valour and perseverance and full faith in final victory until the enemy is expelled from Indian soil and the Indian people are once again a Free Nation.

Subhas Chandra Bose proclaiming the Free India at Cathay Cinema Building in Singapore on 21 October 1943, [21]

The Cathay Building, which was earlier used as cinema, hotel, nightclub, restaurant, etc. was redeveloped in 1999. The front facade of its theatre building structure was gazetted as a national monument for conservation on 10 February 2003, while the rest of the building structure was later demolished. Thus the new building incorporated conservation of the original art-deco façade of the 1939 and combined together with a modern-day design. The Cathay as it is currently known, was opened on 24 March 2006. [24] The 17 story building now houses the retail, food & beverage outlets, an 8-screen Cathay Cineplex and the residential units.

Leaders of the INA

Scholars have generally agreed that both Mohan Singh and Subhas Chandra Bose were influential figures. [25] [1] However, earlier scholars, who were writing at a time when the Indian government had begun to portray Bose as a nationalistic hero, tended to accord much of the success of the INA to Bose. [26] [3] [17] [27] [28] However, scholars from newer non-nationalistic historical traditions, supported by access to newer historical sources, argue that both Singh and Bose were major players in the formation and maintenance of the INA. [1] [26] [27] [28]

Captain Mohan Singh in a meeting with Japanese Major Iwaichi Fujiwara Fujiwara Kikan.jpg
Captain Mohan Singh in a meeting with Japanese Major Iwaichi Fujiwara

Mohan Singh

Captain Mohan Singh was a soldier of the 1/14th Punjab regiment and a member of the British-Indian forces. He and his troops were captured by the Japanese forces in the Northern part of Malaya in December 1941. Singh believed that the British were exploiting the Indians. His desire to gain Indian independence from British rule was one of the main reasons that he agreed to captain the INA and formed an alliance with the Japanese forces albeit with some conditions set to protect the Indians. Singh was instrumental in recruiting many of the British-Indian POWs to become members of the INA and also actively partook in their training.

However, towards the end of 1942, Mohan Singh begun to have disagreements with the Japanese authorities. He felt that the Japanese authorities had not kept their promises of treating the Indians as equals largely because they Indian troops were not provided with the latest military equipment and many of them were asked to do laborer jobs. Singh became increasingly disillusioned with the Japanese forces and surmised that the “Japanese ‘wanted the army [INA] and the organization to be just a show piece and a convenient puppet, but not a strong and powerful reality which may become a problem for them later on, thwart their secret designs on India”. [29]

As the Japanese forces felt that Singh was increasingly uncooperative, they feared that he would influence the rest of the INA to rebel against the Japanese as well. As such, Mohan Singh was dismissed from his position as captain and was arrested by the Japanese military police on 29 December 1942. [25]

After the defeat of the Japanese forces, Singh was sent to India face trial for his role in the INA. However, due to the overwhelming support he received from the Indian population, he was dismissed from the Army and faced no other form of punishment. He eventually pursued a career as a politician. [29]

Young Subhash Chandra Bose 1920 subhash chandra bose as student.png
Young Subhash Chandra Bose

Subhas Chandra Bose (Netaji)

After the capture of Mohan Singh, the Japanese forces enlisted the help of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose to revive and lead the INA. Bose was already very well known amongst the Indian Diaspora communities for his efforts to fight for India's independence and his disagreements with Gandhi's ideologies about fighting for independence. As such, Bose was able to rally the INA forces together . [30] He was also able to convince many of the Indian civilians to contribute to the cause of the INA. [31] Bose also encouraged women to partake in activities of the INA, setting up the first women's unit, the Rani of Jhansi Regiment in October 1943. [32] Bose was also more successful in negotiations with the Japanese to provide support for the Indian troops. This was largely because Bose was more successful than Singh in the military operations that he organized. The success of the troops also forced the Japanese to take the INA more seriously. [11]

However towards the end of the Japanese occupation, even Bose could not salvage the falling morale in the INA despite his best efforts. [1] In the midst of quelling various mutinies that had emerged in various INA camps during August 1945, Bose received information that the Japanese were surrendering. [1] On 15 August 1945, Bose declared the end of the INA through a radio broadcast made in Singapore. [1] Three days later, he perished in an airplane crash. [1]

Decline of the INA

While earlier academics have often attributed the fall of the INA to prevailing socio-economic conditions during the war or the inefficiency of the Japanese forces, more recent literature which have focused on perspectives from the soldiers themselves, suggests that a multitude of factors contributed to the decline of the INA. [1] [2]

Loss of motivation

Towards the end of the Japanese occupation around December 1943, the prevailing socioeconomic conditions for the Indians were quickly going downhill. There was a severe food shortage due to the Japanese losing their footing and influence in many parts of the Southeast Asian region . [1]

The poor economic conditions faced by the Indians contributed to the low morale in the ranks of the INA. To further complicate matters, news of the 1944 Imphal disaster had made its rounds amongst the INA troops as well, contributing to their sense of hopelessness. Many of the INA soldiers had also begun to believes that the Japanese would soon be defeated by the allied forces. As such, they were reluctant to obey instructions to serve the Japanese forces. [3] During this period, the number of civilians who volunteered to be part of the INA declined greatly as well. In December 1944, only a mere 560 civilians became part of the INA. At that point “there were already 2000 deserters at large in Malaya, and 200 men were disappearing from training camps every month”. [3]

The existing INA troops’ unhappiness was further compounded by the news that the 3rd Division of the INA [composed chiefly of local volunteers in Malaya and Singapore] was not going to be allowed to go to Burma to fight for India's independence. Instead, they were tasked to protect the Japanese bases in Singapore and Malaya. [1] In particular the Japanese forces wanted to use the 3rd division to quell the uprising from the Malayan People's Anti-Japanese Army (MPAJA), formed in 1944 and was made up of local Chinese and members of the Malayan Communist Party (MCP). [33] Many INA soldiers chose to defect from the INA as they did not wish to fight the locals for the Japanese forces who had broken their promises of aiding them to fight for the independence of India from the British. Some of those who defected, quickly aligned themselves and forged alliances with MPAJA, as they now felt that there was “no hope of liberating India, the alternative of liberating Malaya begun to seem far more attractive”. [34]

Simultaneously, there was a more rapid dissolution of the INA occurring in Burma. By the middle of June 1945, when Subash Chandra Bose returned to Singapore, he focused on revitalizing the disintegrating INA movement. He engaged in various propaganda measures, most notably, he called for the construction of a memorial in remembrance of the Indian soldiers who died for the INA's cause. [1] However, despite his best efforts, it would appear that there was very little left of the INA to salvage. By that time, many of the INA soldiers were deeply influenced by communist ideologies and were contributing aid and rations to the guerilla forces. [1] This decline in morale and the rise of dissatisfaction amongst the INA soldiers reached its peak in early August, when a riot erupted in one of the INA training camps. This was later believed to have been because the senior “Indian army officers [in that camp] had rebelled in the hopes that they would be better placed when the British forces arrived”. [1]

Acceptance of Defeat

In August 1945, Bose was informed of the Japanese's decision to surrender. This marked the end of the INA and its activities. On 15 August 1945, Bose partook in a final radio broadcast in Singapore. He praised and thanked the Indians in East Asia for their huge scarifies. In his speech, he asserted that:

“A glorious chapter in the History of India's struggle for Freedom has come to a close and, in that chapter, the sons and daughters of India in East Asia will have an undying place.…You sent an unending stream of your sons and daughters to the camps to be trained as soldiers of the Azad Hind Fauj and of the Rani of Jhansi Regiment. Money and materials, you poured lavishly…. Posterity will bless your name, and will talk with pride about your offerings at the altar of India's freedom.…Do not be depressed at our temporary failure.… There is no power on earth that can keep India enslaved. India shall be free and before long.” [29]

Aftermath of the Japanese Occupation in Singapore

Following the end of the Japanese occupation, the INA were viewed with great pride and reverence in India as stories of their struggle for India's independence spread quickly. [1] However, the same could not be said for the former INA members in diasporic Singapore. [1] In Singapore, Indians particularly the ones who were associated with the INA were treated with disdain as they were “stigmatized as fascists and Japanese collaborators”. [34] However, many of the members of the British re-occupation forces were made up of Indian soldiers and this at the very least offered some amount of physical protection for many of the Indians living in Singapore. [34]

Many of the ex-INA soldiers had by then switched loyalties back towards the British. When the British arrived on 5 September 1945 Shinozaki notes that the Gurkhas ... [upon seeing] the INA's memorial tower ... began to knock it down. Many Indians nearby ... clapped their hands at this. I thought to myself, these same people were before in the INA’. [35] With the return of the British, many Indians were afraid that they would become a target because of their connections to the INA and IIL. Largely due to the poor fortunes that they had experienced towards the end of the British colonial rule, many of the educated Indians desired to gain employment within the British administration. As such they pledged (correctly or incorrectly) that they had stayed loyal to the British during the Japanese occupation and had only joined the INA when left with no choice. Some others chose to turn other members of the INA and IIL over to the British force in order to gain favour with the British administration. [1]

Long-term significance of the Indian National Army

Despite being dissolved in August 1945, the INA and its legacy continued to have far reaching consequences in India such as influencing the new Indian Army, altering British policy towards the Indian forces and also playing a major role in shaping the political outcome following India's independence.

Effects on the Indian Army (after 1945)

The INA had left deep impressions on many of the existing British-Indian soldiers, many of them who had been recruited during the war. Their encounters with members of the INA and the secret circulation of past INA propaganda had a lasting impression of the British-Indian soldiers. One British officer observed: "In the eleven months which had ... elapsed since the first contacts of the Indian Army, Navy and Air Force with the mass of the I.N.A. in Rangoon, there had been widespread fraternization. Its result was political consciousness which the Indian Servicemen had never before possessed." This new consciousness led them to react more sharply not only to the existing grievances in the Service but to the pressing political issues of the post-war years. [12]

Coupled with the glorification of the INA by various political parties, the morale of the members of the British-Indian troops began to decline and signs of rebellion began to emerge. [12] During the first INA trial, in November 1945, the Royal Indian Air Force went on a strike to protest against the trials and in February 1946, the Royal Indian Navy also joined the mutiny with some areas where the RIN was stationed, experiencing bursts of violence. It was evident by the middle of 1946 that much of the Indian Armed Forces were INA sympathizers. [12]

Changes by the British colonial administration

The British administration was able to gather some important lessons from the revolt of the British-Indian officers to form the INA. Prior to World War II, the British had been certain that certain “martial races” would be forever loyal to the British. [12] However, this confidence was shaken after the events of World War II. During the INA trials which occurred shortly after the surrender of the Japanese, the British forces uncovered that this “martial races” had felt discriminated by the British government in terms “pay, allowance and promotions”. [12] This was said to be one of the biggest motivations for the revolt. This “was a lesson for the colonial powers”. [12] In fact, some authors have argued that these realizations greatly shaped the policy of the British towards the Indian forces in the next few years before India achieved independence in 1947. The British resorted to treating the Indian soldiers with more suspicion but ensured greater equality to prevent such an occurrence again. [12]

Contributions to the Indian nationalist movements

Some academics believe that the INA acted as a catalyst for the |India independence movement as it sped up the end of British rule in India. [36] [37] [26] [18] The INA and its legacy continued to aid the Indian Nationalist movements and brought together various groups of people who were previously in conflict with each other. This was especially so after the trials of some of the INA officers between 1945 and 1946. [12] The trials were said to have “created a widespread revolutionary anti-British sentiment in India. A consensus of opinion arose among almost all the political parties in India which condemned the Government's policy of trying certain I.N.A. officers by court martial.”. [12] The Muslim League, Hindu religious groups such as the Mahasabha and Akali Dal, and the Socialist leaders all came together to lend their support to the INA soldiers. In fact, the Indian National Congress was able to gain popularity amongst the general Indian population by choosing to side with the INA officers despite their varying religious faiths, thus establishing itself as a secular political party which could represent the interest of all groups of Indians. [12] This would eventually play an important role in the Indian National Congress winning the first general elections in 1947, following the departure of the British. [38]

Memory of the INA in Singapore History

Monuments and important places

Farrer Park Field adjacent to Little India, Cathay Building where Subhas Chandra proclaimed an independent India, Padang former INA sepoy lines ground and adjacent Former Indian National Army Monument at Esplanade Park are the important sites related to INA. All of these lie, from north to south along a 4 km route, within the Central Business District (CBD). The supreme command of the INA was set up at Mount Pleasant and the PoW headquarters with the largest PoW camp was set up at Neesoon (Yishun) under General M. Z. Kiani. Other smaller PoW camps housing Indian troops were set up at Bidadari, Tyersall, Buller (Queenstown), Seletar and Kranji. [18]

Farrer Park Field, where Japanese held the alliance building meeting in February 1942 with native Indian Prisoners of War of British Indian Army which led to the eventual formation of the INA in the same month, [11] [1] is an important site. In 1942, following the Japanese takeover of Singapore, soldiers from the British Indian Army were rounded up at Farrer Park Field to urge them to switch allegiance to the Japanese. This event is now known as the Farrer Park address. [39] [40]

Padang (literally "the field" in Malay language), where Subhas Chandra Bose addressed the INA soldiers several times. On 9 July 1943 he mobilised the resources for the independence of India with the inspiring words, "Time has come for three million Indians living in East Asia to mobilise all their available resources including money and manpower. Half-hearted measures will not do. …Out of this total mobilisation I expect at least three hundred thousand soldiers and three crores that is thirty million dollars." On 5 August 1943 in another address at Padang he inspired, and received overwhelming response, when he questioned the soldiers if they felt "Jai Hind" (Victory for India) and "Chalo Dhili" (Lets march on Delhi) slogans were essential part of their spirit. [41] This field is now a gazetted national monument of Singapore, [42] [43] and also houses Singapore Cricket Club Ground where the first One Day International cricket match was held during the 1995–96 Singer Cup - a triangular series involving India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. [44] [45]

Cathay Building is an important site in the history of the independence of India, it is where Subhas Chandra Bose proclaimed the Free India and formed the first independent government of pre-partition united India on 21 October 1943 (see also Greater India and Akhand Bharat). [22]

Former Indian National Army Monument, built during Japanese occupation of Singapore during World War II, was demolished by the British colonial administration after the defeat of Japanese in the war, and a new plaque monument stands there now. [46] This plaque was erected by the National Heritage Board, with financial donations from the Indian community in Singapore, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of World War II. [47]

Tyersall Park which housed British Indian Army hospital which was bombed by the Japanese forces prior to their invasion of Singapore. After the invasion, it served as one of seven POW camps for interned Indian Army personnel who later became part of INA in Singapore under Lieutenant Colonel Gurbaksh Singh (not to be confused with INA General Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon) of the Jind State force, comprising jats and other troops mainly from Haryana and Punjab. [48]

Deliberate lack of prominence in Singapore Government's official narrative

Asad Latif has documented Singapore's INA connection in his book "India in the making of Singapore". [49] National Archives of Singapore and National Heritage Board of Singapore are involved in the preservation of research material and heritage sites in Singapore related to the INA.[ citation needed ]

Many scholars have claimed the INA's story, is an integral part of the history of Indians in Singapore. [1] [2] There has been little focus on the INA in the post-independence historical narrative of Singapore. [1] [4] [50] The INA is only very briefly mentioned as an anti-colonial force in much of Singapore's post-independence historical narrative. The Singapore government often chooses not to allow war commemorations to be along ethnic lines. [51] These accounts often omit the information of the INA soldiers fighting for the Japanese forces, under whom the Chinese population had endured great hardship. [15]

One explanation is that In the early formation years of Singapore, the government “found themselves in a state without a nation” [15] and at that moment they took advantage of the common suffering that the people had endured during the Japanese occupation and attempted to turn it into one of the cornerstones of nation building in Singapore. [47] As such, in order to play up the suffering as a common thread and collective memory, the Singapore government had left out the part of history where the Indians in Singapore had joined hands with the Japanese. Instead, they proceeded to highlight that people living in Singapore from all walks of life had suffered extensively at the hands of the Japanese. Consequently, that feeling of mutual suffering contributed to them being and feeling Singaporean. This exclusion about details of the INA from the historical narrative helped to create a sense of identity and unity in a rather fragmented society at that time. [47] [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian National Army</span> Army of mostly Indian POWs of Japan in WW2

The Indian National Army was a collaborationist armed unit of Indian collaborators that fought under the command of the Japanese Empire. It was founded by Mohan Singh on 1 September 1942 in Southeast Asia during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subhas Chandra Bose</span> Indian nationalist leader and politician (1897–1945)

Subhas Chandra Bose was an Indian nationalist whose defiance of British authority in India made him a hero among many Indians, but his wartime alliances with Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan left a legacy vexed by authoritarianism, anti-Semitism, and military failure. The honorific 'Netaji' was first applied to Bose in Germany in early 1942—by the Indian soldiers of the Indische Legion and by the German and Indian officials in the Special Bureau for India in Berlin. It is now used throughout India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India in World War II</span> Involvement of India in World War II

During the Second World War (1939–1945), India was a part of the British Empire. British India officially declared war on Nazi Germany in September 1939. India, as a part of the Allied Nations, sent over two and a half million soldiers to fight under British command against the Axis powers. India was also used as the base for American operations in support of China in the China Burma India Theater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Azad Hind</span> Indian provisional government in Japanese-occupied Singapore during World War II

The Provisional Government of Free India or, more simply, Azad Hind, was a short-lived Japanese-supported provisional government in India. It was established in Japanese occupied Singapore during World War II in October 1943 and has been considered a puppet state of the Empire of Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Legion</span> Indian volunteer unit in Nazi Germany

The Indian Legion, officially the Free India Legion or 950th (Indian) Infantry Regiment, was a military unit raised during the Second World War initially as part of the German Army and later the Waffen-SS from August 1944. Intended to serve as a liberation force for British-ruled India, it was made up of Indian prisoners of war and expatriates in Europe. Due to its origins in the Indian independence movement, it was known also as the "Tiger Legion", and the "Azad Hind Fauj". As part of the Waffen-SS it was known as the Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shah Nawaz Khan (general)</span> Indian Army General and MP (1914–1983)

Shah Nawaz Khan was an Indian politician who served as an officer in the Indian National Army (INA) during World War II. He was profoundly influenced by Subhas Chandra Bose's speeches asking POWs to join the Indian National Army and to fight for a free India, Khan led the army into North-Eastern India, seizing Kohima and Imphal which were held briefly by the INA under the authority of the Japanese. In December 1944, Shah Nawaz Khan was appointed Commander of the 1st Division at Mandalay. After the war, he was tried, convicted for treason, and sentenced to death in a public court-martial carried out by the British Indian Army. The sentence was commuted by the Commander-in-chief of the Indian Army following unrest and protests in India. After the trial, Khan declared that he would henceforth follow the path of non-violence espoused by Mahatama Gandhi and joined the Congress party. Having successfully contested the first Lok Sabha in 1952 from Meerut, Khan had an illustrious parliamentary career. He was elected four times to the Lok Sabha from Meerut constituency in 1951, 1957, 1962 and 1971. He lost in the 1967 and 1977 Lok Sabha election from Meerut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohan Singh (military officer)</span> Indian army officer and politician

Mohan Singh was a British Indian Army officer, and later member of the Indian Independence Movement, best known for founding and leading the Indian National Army in South East Asia during World War II. Following Indian independence, Mohan Singh later served in public life as a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha of the Indian Parliament.

The Indian Independence League was a political organisation operated from the 1920s to the 1940s to organise those living outside British India into seeking the removal of British colonial rule over the region. Founded by Indian nationalists, its activities were conducted in various parts of Southeast Asia. It included Indian expatriates, and later, Indian nationalists in-exile under Japanese occupation following Japan's successful Malayan Campaign during the first part of the Second World War. During the Japanese Occupation of Malaya, the Japanese encouraged Indians in Malaya to join the League.

The Bangkok Conference was a conference held on 23 June 1942 by Indian Nationalist groups and local Indian Independence leagues at Bangkok to proclaim the formation of the All-India Independence league. The conference further saw the adoption by the league of a thirty-four set resolution known as the Bangkok resolutions that attempted to define the role of the league in the Independence movement, relations with the nascent Indian National Army, and clarify the grounds and conditions for obtaining Japanese support for it. The resolution further attempted to clarify the relations of Japan and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere with a free India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian National Army trials</span> British Indian trial by courts-martial

The Indian National Army trials was the British Indian trial by court-martial of a number of officers of the Indian National Army (INA) between November 1945 and May 1946, on various charges of treason, torture, murder and abetment to murder, during the Second World War.

Ram Singh Thakuri was an Indian freedom fighter, musician and composer. He composed a number of patriotic songs including Kadam Kadam Badaye Ja and Subh Sukh Chain whilst serving in the Indian National Army.

The Bidadari Resolutions were set of resolutions adopted by the nascent Indian National Army in April 1942 that declared the formation of the INA and its aim to launch an armed struggle for Indian independence. The resolution was declared at a prisoner-of-war camp at the Bidadari in Singapore during Japanese occupation of the island.

Giani Pritam Singh Dhillon was an Indian freedom fighter and Sikh missionary who, as a member of the Ghadar Party, was instrumental in the planning of the failed 1915 Ghadar conspiracy in the British Indian Army. Giani Pritam Singh Dhillon was a close friend of Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon, famous Sikh Indian independence movement leader and prominent member of the Indian National Army. He was also close associate of Subhas Chandra Bose. Pritam Singh is also remembered for reviving the same idea during World War II by seeking Japanese support in the establishment of what came to be the Indian National Army. Pritam Singh died in a plane crash in 1942.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohammed Zaman Kiani</span> British Indian army officer

Major General Mohammed Zaman Kiani was an officer of the British Indian Army who later joined the Indian National Army (INA), led by Subhas Chandra Bose, and commanded its 1st Division.

K. P. Keshava Menon (1884?–?) was an Indian lawyer and a leading Indian independence activist from Kerala who was a key proponent of the formation of the Indian Independence League (IIL) and a lawyer for the Indian National Army (INA).

The First Indian National Army was the Indian National Army as it existed between February and December 1942. It was formed with Japanese aid and support after the Fall of Singapore and consisted of approximately 12,000 of the 40,000 Indian prisoners of war who were captured either during the Malayan campaign or surrendered at Singapore. It was formally proclaimed in April 1942 and declared the subordinate military wing of the Indian Independence League in June that year. The unit was formed by Mohan Singh. The unit was dissolved in December 1942 after apprehensions of Japanese motives with regards to the INA led to disagreements and distrust between Mohan Singh and INA leadership on one hand, and the League's leadership, most notably Rash Behari Bose. Later on, the leadership of the Indian National Army was handed to Subhas Chandra Bose. A large number of the INAs initial volunteers, however, later went on to join the INA in its second incarnation under Subhas Chandra Bose.

The Farrer Park address was an assembly of the surrendered Indian troops of the British Indian Army held at Farrer Park in Singapore on 17 February 1942, two days after the Fall of Singapore. The assembly was marked by a series of three addresses in which the British Malaya Command formally surrendered the Indian troops of the British Indian Army to Major Fujiwara Iwaichi representing the Japanese military authority, followed by transfer of authority by Fujiwara to the command of Mohan Singh, and a subsequent address by Mohan Singh to the gathered troops declaring the formation of the Indian National Army to fight the Raj, asking for volunteers to join the army.

The Battles and Operations involving the Indian National Army during World War II were all fought in the South-East Asian theatre. These range from the earliest deployments of the INA's preceding units in espionage during Malayan Campaign in 1942, through the more substantial commitments during the Japanese Ha Go and U Go offensives in the Upper Burma and Manipur region, to the defensive battles during the Allied Burma campaign. The INA's brother unit in Europe, the Indische Legion did not see any substantial deployment although some were engaged in Atlantic wall duties, special operations in Persia and Afghanistan, and later a small deployment in Italy. The INA was not considered a significant military threat. However, it was deemed a significant strategic threat especially to the Indian Army, with Wavell describing it as a target of prime importance.

Habib ur Rahman (1913–1978) was an army officer in the Indian National Army (INA) who was charged with "waging war against His Majesty the King Emperor". He served as Subhas Chandra Bose's chief of staff in Singapore, and accompanied Bose on his alleged last fatal flight from Taipei to Tokyo, sharing the last moments of his life. Rahman also played an important role in the First Kashmir War. Convinced that Maharaja Hari Singh was out to exterminate the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir, he joined Major General Zaman Kiani, in launching a rebellion against the Maharaja from Gujrat in Pakistani Punjab. Rehman and his volunteer force launched an attack on the Bhimber town. But, the records of the 11th Cavalry of the Pakistan Army indicate that their efforts did not succeed, and eventually the Cavalry was responsible for conquering Bhimber.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon</span> Officer in the Indian National Army (1914–2006)

Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon was an officer of the Indian National Army (INA). He faced charges of "waging war against His Majesty the King Emperor" due to his pivotal role in the Indian independence movement. For his contributions, he was awarded the Padma Bhushan, the third-highest civilian honour of the Republic of India.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Rai, Rajesh (2014). Indians in Singapore 1819-1945: Diaspora in the Colonial Port City. Oxford University Press.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sundaram, C (2007). A Military History of Indian and Southeast Asia: From the East India Company to the Nuclear Era. London: Praeger Security International. pp. 123–130.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Toye, Hugh (1959). The Springing Tiger: A Study of a Revolutionary. Cassell.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lebra, Joyce C (2008). The Indian National Army and Japan. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  5. Moreman, Tim (2013). The Jungle, Japanese and the British Commonwealth Armies at War, 1941–45: Fighting Methods, Doctrine and Training for Jungle Warfare. Routledge. ISBN   978-1-135-76456-2.
  6. Marston2014 , pp. 130–132: "Many Indian Army POWs were perplexed by Congress's sudden support for the INA"
  7. Singh 2003, p. 98.
  8. Sarkar 1983 , p. 420
  9. 1 2 Low, D. A. (1966-01-01). "The Government of India and the First Non-Cooperation Movement--1920-1922". The Journal of Asian Studies. 25 (2): 241–259. doi: 10.2307/2051326 . JSTOR   2051326. S2CID   162717788.
  10. Habib, Irfan (1998-01-01). "The Left and the National Movement". Social Scientist. 26 (5/6): 3–33. doi:10.2307/3517546. JSTOR   3517546.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Havers, Robin (2005-01-01). "Jai Hind!: The Indian National Army, 1942–45". In Bennett, Matthew; Latawski, Paul (eds.). Exile Armies . Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp.  55–67. doi:10.1057/9780230522459_6. ISBN   9781349426041.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Ghosh, Kalyan Kumar (1968). The Indian National Army: Motives, Problems and Significance. Department of History, University of Malaya.
  13. Kikan, F (1983). Japanese army intelligence operations in Southeast Asia during World War II / Fujiwara Iwaichi ; translated by Akashi Yoji. Hong Kong: Heinemann Asia.
  14. 1 2 Farewell, B. (1984). The Gurkhas. Allen Lane.
  15. 1 2 3 4 BLACKBURN, KEVIN (2000-01-01). "The Collective Memory of the Sook Ching Massacre and the Creation of the Civilian War Memorial of Singapore". Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society. 73 (2 (279)): 71–90. JSTOR   41493428.
  16. Turnbull, Constance Mary (1989). A History of Singapore, 1819-1988. Oxford University Press.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Toye, Hugh (1984-09-01). "The First Indian National Army, 1941–42". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 15 (2): 365–381. doi:10.1017/S0022463400012583. ISSN   1474-0680. S2CID   162199269.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Fay 1993
  19. Durrani, M. (1955). The Sixth Column" The Heroic Personal Story of Lt Col Mahmood Khan Durrani. Cassell.
  20. Ghosh, Kalyan Kumar (1969). The Indian National Army: Second Front of the Indian Independence Movement. Meenakshi Prakashan.
  21. 1 2 Bose in Singapore, Frontline (magazine), December 08, 2017.
  22. 1 2 Provisional Government of Azad Hind, National Archives of Singapore.
  23. Hasumi, Shiguéhiko (2003). Kantoku Ozu Yasujiro[Director Yasujiro Ozu] (in Japanese) (Enlarged and definitive ed.). Chikuma Shobo. ISBN   4-480-87341-4.
  24. "That golden age..." Retrieved 2018-06-08.
  25. 1 2 Green, L. C. (1948-01-01). "The Indian National Army Trials". The Modern Law Review. 11 (1): 47–69. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1948.tb00071.x. ISSN   1468-2230.
  26. 1 2 3 Cohen, S (2001). The Indian Army: Its contribution to the development of a nation. Oxford University Press.
  27. 1 2 Appadurai, A. (1993). "Patriotism and Its Futures". Public Culture. 5 (3): 411–429. doi:10.1215/08992363-5-3-411 . Retrieved 2017-04-19.
  28. 1 2 Chakrabarthy, B. (2009). Modern Indian Political Thought: Text and Context. Sage Publications India Pte Ltd. pp. 193–205.
  29. 1 2 3 Sareen, T. (1986). Japan and the Indian National Army. Agam Prakashan.
  30. Cohen, Stephen P. (1963-01-01). "Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National Army". Pacific Affairs. 36 (4): 411–429. doi:10.2307/2754686. JSTOR   2754686.
  31. Pande, Amba (2016-07-03). "Bose, beyond the 'Mystery'". Strategic Analysis. 40 (4): 234–238. doi:10.1080/09700161.2016.1184795. ISSN   0970-0161. S2CID   147881461.
  32. Rettig, Tobias (2013-12-01). "Recruiting the All-Female Rani of Jhansi Regiment: Subhas Chandra Bose and Dr Lakshmi Swaminadhan". South East Asia Research. 21 (4): 627–638. doi:10.5367/sear.2013.0178. ISSN   0967-828X. S2CID   144067014.
  33. Mahajani, U. (1960). The Role of Indian Minorities in Burma and Malaya . Vora.
  34. 1 2 3 Stenson, M. (1980). Class, Race and Colonialism in West Malaysia. University of Queensland Press.
  35. Shinozaki, M. (1973). My Wartime Experiences in Singapore. Oral History Programme Series No.3. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  36. Chaudhuri, N. (1953). Subhas Chandra Bose-His Legacy and Legend. Pacific Affairs, 26(4), 349-357.
  37. Sarkar, S. (1989). Modern India 1885–1947. Springer
  38. Alpes, M. (2007). The Congress and the INA Trials, 1945–50: Contest over the Perception of ‘Nationalist’ Politics . Studies in History, 3(21), 135–158 .
  39. Fay 1993 , p. 83
  40. Fay 1993 , p. 84
  41. Provisional Government of Arzi Hind, National Archives of Singapore.
  42. "Singapore River Bridges and the Padang to be gazetted as National Monuments" (PDF). NHB. 3 August 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
  43. Ang, Prisca (15 October 2019). "Another $15 million in restoration funds for owners of national monuments". The Straits Times. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
  44. "One-Day International Matches played on The Padang, Singapore". CricketArchive. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
  45. "Ground profile: The Padang, Singapore". CricketArchive. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
  46. "INA War Memorial in Singapore". National Archives of Singapore (S1942.org.sg). Archived from the original on 10 April 2007. Retrieved 7 November 2006.
  47. 1 2 3 Henderson, J. (2007). Remembering the Second World War in Singapore: Wartime Heritage as a Visitor Attraction. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2(1), 36-52.
  48. Brig Jasbir, Singh (2010). Escape from Singapore. India: Lancer Publisher. p. 50. ISBN   978-1935501206.
  49. INA monument connect Singapore with Subhas Chandra Bose, Deccan Herald, NOV 22 2019.
  50. Wong, D. (2001). Memory suppression and memory production: the Japanese Occupation of Singapore. In J. Fujitani, G. White, & L. Yoneyama, Perilous Memories: The Asia-Pacific War(s) (pp. 218-238). Perilous memories: the Asia-Pacific wars
  51. Salleh, B. (2012). War Memory and the Making of Modern Malaysia and Singapore (Review). Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 122-124

Notes