Julius Caesar's planned invasion of the Parthian Empire

Last updated
Caesar's planned invasion of Parthia
Part of the Roman-Parthian Wars
Scythia-Parthia 100 BC.png
The invasion was to begin in Dacia then continue to Parthia. According to Plutarch, Scythia was to be Caesar's next target.
Operational scope Dacia, Middle East and Central Asia
Plannedfor 44 BC
Planned by Roman Republic under Julius Caesar
Target Burebista's Dacian kingdom, Parthian Empire, various other states and peoples
Executed byPlanned:
    • 16 legions (c. 60,000 men)
    • 10,000 cavalry
    • Unknown number of auxiliary cavalry and light infantry
OutcomeEventual cancellation and diversion of Roman forces among civil war parties

Julius Caesar's planned invasion of the Parthian Empire was a planned war of the Roman Republic against the Parthian Empire. The assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BC prevented the invasion from taking place. [1]

Contents

Following his victory in the Civil War against Pompey and his followers in 45 BC, Caesar's authority was uncontested in the Roman Republic. His next plan was to launch an invasion of the Parthian Empire, the other great power of the period, which had, like the Republic, vastly expanded over the previous two centuries. Caesar sought to avenge the disaster of Carrhae in 53 BC, when the Parthians soundly defeated an invading army led by Crassus. The campaign was to start with the pacification of Dacia, followed by an invasion of the Parthian Empire. [1] [2] [3]

However, the invasion was cancelled with the murder of Julius Caesar on 15 March 44 BC. In 36 BC, Mark Antony, Caesar's former lieutenant, likewise attempted to conquer the Parthian Empire.

Plutarch also claims that once Parthia had been subdued, the army was to continue to Scythia, then Germania and finally back to Rome. [4] Those grander plans are found only in Plutarch's Parallel Lives , and their authenticity is questioned by most scholars. [5]

Preparation and invasion plans

There is evidence that Caesar had begun practical preparation for the campaign some time before late 45 BC. [6] By 44 BC Caesar had begun a mass mobilization, sixteen legions (c.60,000 men) and 10,000 cavalry were being gathered for the invasion. [7] [8] These would be supported by auxiliary cavalry and light armed infantry. [9] In 46 and 45, two supporters of Caesar, Titus Carisius and Lucius Valerius Acisculus, also struck denarii with eastern symbols, such as Sol and the sphinx, which may allude to the planned campaign. [10]

L. Valerius Acisculus, AR denarius, 45 BC, RRC 474-5.jpg
T. Carisius, AR denarius, 46 BC, RRC 464-1.jpg
Denarii minted by Carisius in 46 BC (top) and Valerius Acisculus in 45 BC (bottom). The use of Sol and the sphinx may allude to the planned Parthian campaign. [11]

Six of the legions had already been sent to Macedonia to train, along with a large sum of gold for the expedition. [9] Octavius was sent to Apollonia (within modern Albania), ostensibly as a student, to remain in contact with the army. [12] As Caesar planned to be away for some time, he reordered the senate [12] and ensured that all magistrates, consuls and tribunes would be appointed by him during his absence. [13] [14] Caesar intended to leave Rome to start the campaign on 18 March; however, three days prior to his departure he was assassinated. [1]

King Burebista of Dacia was the initial target of Caesar's plans. Burebista cropped.png
King Burebista of Dacia was the initial target of Caesar's plans.

The expedition was planned to take three years. [15] It was to begin with a punitive attack on Dacia under King Burebista, who had been threatening Macedonia's northern border. [15] [16] It has been suggested by Christopher Pelling that Dacia, not Parthia, was going to be the expedition's main target. [16]

After Dacia the army was then to invade Parthia from Armenia. [2] [3] [lower-alpha 1] [lower-alpha 2] The ancient sources diverge. Suetonius states that Caesar wished to proceed cautiously and would not fully engage the Parthian army unless he had determined their full strength. [3] Although he implies that Caesar's goal was an expansion of the empire, not just its stabilization, [5] Plutarch describes a bolder campaign by writing that once Parthia had been subdued, the army would move through the Caucasus, attack Scythia and return to Italy after it had conquered Germania. [4] Plutarch also states that the construction of a canal through the isthmus of Corinth for which Anienus had been placed in charge, was to occur during the campaign. [18] [lower-alpha 3]

Plutarch's reliability

Plutarch's Parallel Lives was written with the intention of finding correlations between the lives of famous Romans and Greeks; [20] for example, Caesar was paired with Alexander the Great. [21] Buszard's reading of Parallel Lives also interprets Plutarch as trying to use Caesar's future plans as a case study in the error of unbridled ambition. [21]

Some academics have theorised that Caesar's pairing with Alexander and Trajan's invasion of Parthia, which was around the time of Plutarch's writing, led to exaggerations in the presented invasion plan. [5] The deployment of the army to Macedonia near the Dacian frontier and the lack of military preparation in Syria have also been used to lend support for that hypothesis. [16] [22] Malitz acknowledges that the Scythia and Germania plans appear to be unrealistic but believes that they were credible with the geographic knowledge of the time. [15]

Motivation for invasion

The public excuse for the expedition was that less than ten years earlier, in 53 BC, an invasion of the Parthian Empire had been attempted by Roman Consul Marcus Licinius Crassus [12] and ended in failure and his death at the Battle of Carrhae. To many Romans, that required revenge. [lower-alpha 4] Also, Parthia had taken Pompey's side in the recent civil war against Caesar. [23] [lower-alpha 5]

As the Roman Republic in 45 BC was still politically divided after the civil war, Marcus Cicero tried to lobby Caesar to postpone the Parthian invasion and to solve domestic problems instead. Following a similar line of thought in June that year, Caesar temporarily wavered in his intention to leave with the expedition. [24] However, Caesar finally decided to leave Rome and to join the army in Macedonia.

A number of motivations have been proposed to explain his decision to continue his military career. [25] After a victorious campaign he would have, as Plutarch wrote, "completed this circuit of his empire, which would then be bounded on all sides by the ocean" [26] and returned home with his lifelong dictatorship secured. [6] It has also been proposed that Caesar knew of the threats against him and felt that leaving Rome and being in the company of a loyal army would be safer both personally and politically. [24] Caesar may have also wished to heal the rift from the civil war or to distract from it by reminding the populace of Rome of the threat of a neighbouring empire. [9]

Aftermath

In order to support a royal title for Caesar, a rumour was spread before the planned invasion. It alleged that it had been prophesied that only a Roman king could defeat Parthia. [7] [12] As Caesar's greatest internal opposition came from those that believed he wanted royal power, that strengthened the conspiracy against him. [27]

It has also been proposed that Caesar's opposition would be fearful of him returning victorious from his campaign since he would be more popular than ever. [6] [28]

The assassination occurred on 15 March 44 BC on the day that the senate was to debate granting Caesar the title of king for the war with Parthia. [12] However, some of the aspects of Caesar's planned kingship may have been invented after the assassination to justify the act. [5] The relationship between the planned Parthian war and his death, if any, is unknown. [5] [29]

After Caesar's death, Mark Antony successfully vied for control of the legions from the planned invasion, which were still stationed in Macedonia, and he temporarily took control of that province to do so. [14] From 40 to 33 BC, Rome and particularly Antony would wage an unsuccessful war against Parthia. [30] He used Caesar's proposed invasion plan, of attacking through Armenia, where it was felt that the support of the local king could be relied on. [9]

In Dacia, Burebista died the same year as Caesar, which led to the dissolution of his kingdom. [12]

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Caesar's invasion plan used more cavalry than Marcus Licinius Crassus's and approached through the friendly territory of Armenia. It is believed that both factors would have improved his chances of success relative to the earlier attempt. [9]
  2. ↑ From 46 BC Quintus Caecilius Bassus had control of Syria. Bassus had supported Pompey in the civil war, had murdered Caesar's cousin, Sextus Caesar, and defeated the new governor sent by Caesar. [17]
  3. ↑ Nicolaus of Damascus also mentions an intention to continue to India after Parthia. [19]
  4. ↑ According to Dio, the Roman people's desire for that revenge led to Caesar being given sole command of the Parthian campaign by a unanimous vote. [13]
  5. ↑ Parthia was aware of the political divide in Rome and that Caesar's victory in the civil war could lead to invasion. [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Antony</span> Roman politician and general (83–30 BC)

Marcus Antonius, commonly known in English as Mark Antony, was a Roman politician and general who played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic from a constitutional republic into the autocratic Roman Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcus Licinius Crassus</span> Roman general and statesman (115 – 53 BC)

Marcus Licinius Crassus was a Roman general and statesman who played a key role in the transformation of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He is often called "the richest man in Rome".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaius Cassius Longinus</span> Roman senator and general (c.86 BC–42 BC)

Gaius Cassius Longinus was a Roman senator and general best known as a leading instigator of the plot to assassinate Julius Caesar on 15 March 44 BC. He was the brother-in-law of Brutus, another leader of the conspiracy. He commanded troops with Brutus during the Battle of Philippi against the combined forces of Mark Antony and Octavian, Caesar's former supporters, and committed suicide after being defeated by Mark Antony.

From its origin as a city-state on the peninsula of Italy in the 8th century BC, to its rise as an empire covering much of Southern Europe, Western Europe, Near East and North Africa to its fall in the 5th century AD, the political history of Ancient Rome was closely entwined with its military history. The core of the campaign history of the Roman military is an aggregate of different accounts of the Roman military's land battles, from its initial defense against and subsequent conquest of the city's hilltop neighbors on the Italian peninsula, to the ultimate struggle of the Western Roman Empire for its existence against invading Huns, Vandals and Germanic tribes. These accounts were written by various authors throughout and after the history of the Empire. Following the First Punic War, naval battles were less significant than land battles to the military history of Rome due to its encompassment of lands of the periphery and its unchallenged dominance of the Mediterranean Sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Carrhae</span> Part of the Roman–Parthian Wars

The Battle of Carrhae was fought in 53 BC between the Roman Republic and the Parthian Empire near the ancient town of Carrhae. An invading force of seven legions of Roman heavy infantry under Marcus Licinius Crassus was lured into the desert and decisively defeated by a mixed cavalry army of heavy cataphracts and light horse archers led by the Parthian general Surena. On such flat terrain, the Legion proved to have no viable tactics against the highly-mobile Parthian horsemen, and the slow and vulnerable Roman formations were surrounded, exhausted by constant attacks, and eventually crushed. Crassus was killed along with the majority of his army. It is commonly seen as one of the earliest and most important battles between the Roman and Parthian Empires and one of the most crushing defeats in Roman history. According to the poet Ovid in Book 6 of his poem Fasti, the battle occurred on 9 June.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman–Iranian relations</span> Historical relationship between the Roman and Iranian empires

Relations between the Roman and Iranian states were established c. 92 BC. It was in 69 BC that the two states clashed for the first time; the political rivalry between the two empires would dominate much of Western Asia and Europe until 628. Initially commencing as a rivalry between the Parthians and Rome, from the 3rd to mid-7th centuries the Roman Empire and its rival Sassanid Persia were recognized as two of the leading powers in the world.

Publius Ventidius was a Roman general and one of Julius Caesar's protégés. He won key victories against the Parthians which resulted in the deaths of key leaders – victories which redeemed the losses of Crassus and paved the way for Antony's incursions. According to Plutarch in his "Life of Antony", the three military victories of Ventidius over the Parthians singularly resulted in the only award to a Roman general of the triumphal ceremony for victory over Parthians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quintus Labienus</span> 1st-century BCE Roman general

Quintus Labienus Parthicus was a Roman general in the Late Republic period. The son of Titus Labienus, he made an alliance with Parthia and invaded the Roman provinces in the eastern Mediterranean which were under the control of Mark Antony. He occupied the Roman province of Syria together with the Parthians in 40 BC. He then pushed into southern Anatolia, still with Parthian support. The main Parthian force took charge of Syria and invaded Judea. Both Labienus and the Parthians were defeated by Publius Ventidius Bassus, who recovered these provinces for Mark Antony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberators' civil war</span> 43–42 BC Roman war after Caesars assassination

The Liberators' civil war was started by the Second Triumvirate to avenge Julius Caesar's assassination. The war was fought by the forces of Mark Antony and Octavian against the forces of Caesar's assassins, led by Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus, referred to as the Liberatores. The latter were defeated by the Triumvirs at the Battle of Philippi in October 42 BC, and committed suicide. Brutus committed suicide after the second part of the battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assassination of Julius Caesar</span> 44 BCE murder of the Roman dictator

Julius Caesar was assassinated by a group of senators on the Ides of March of 44 BC during a meeting of the Senate at the Curia of Pompey of the Theatre of Pompey in Rome where the senators stabbed Caesar 23 times. They claimed to be acting over fears that Caesar's unprecedented concentration of power during his dictatorship was undermining the Roman Republic. At least 60 to 70 senators were party to the conspiracy, led by Marcus Junius Brutus, Gaius Cassius Longinus, and Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus. Despite the death of Caesar, the conspirators were unable to restore the institutions of the Republic. The ramifications of the assassination led to his martyrdom, the Liberators' civil war and ultimately to the Principate period of the Roman Empire.

The Roman–Parthian Wars were a series of conflicts between the Parthian Empire and the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. It was the first series of conflicts in what would be 682 years of Roman–Persian Wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Publius Licinius Crassus (son of triumvir)</span> Son of Crassus the triumvir

Publius Licinius Crassus was one of two sons of Marcus Licinius Crassus, the so-called "triumvir", and Tertulla, daughter of Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus. He belonged to the last generation of Roman nobiles who came of age and began a political career before the collapse of the Republic. His peers included Marcus Antonius, Marcus Junius Brutus, Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus, the poet Gaius Valerius Catullus, and the historian Gaius Sallustius Crispus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antony's Atropatene campaign</span>

Antony's Atropatene campaign was a military campaign by Mark Antony, the eastern triumvir of the Roman Republic, against the Parthian Empire under Phraates IV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seleucid–Parthian Wars</span> 238 BC–129 BC series of conflicts between the Seleucid Empire and Parthia

The Seleucid–Parthian wars were a series of conflicts between the Seleucid Empire and the Parthian Empire which resulted in the ultimate expulsion of the Seleucids from the Iranian Plateau and the surrounding regions. The wars were caused by the mass migration of the nomadic Iranian Parni tribe into Parthia and the establishment of the Parthian state, which challenged Seleucid hegemony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military campaigns of Julius Caesar</span> Caesars military campaigns of 58–50 and 49–45 BC

The military campaigns of Julius Caesar were a series of wars that reshaped the political landscape of the Roman Republic, expanded its territories, and ultimately paved the way for the transition from republic to empire. The wars constituted both the Gallic Wars and Caesar's civil war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Histria</span> Battle between the Scythian Bastarnae and Romans led by Gaius Antonius Hybrida

The Battle of Histria, c. 62–61 B.C., was fought between the Bastarnae peoples of Scythia Minor and the Roman Consul Gaius Antonius Hybrida. The Bastarnae emerged victorious from the battle after successfully launching a surprise attack on the Roman troops; Hybrida escaped alongside his cavalry forces leaving behind the infantry to be massacred by the Bastarnian-Scythian attackers.

The Pompeian–Parthian invasion of 40 BC occurred after the Pompeians, backed by the Parthian Empire, had been defeated during the Liberators' civil war by Mark Antony and Octavian.

Antony's campaign against Armenia occurred in 34 BCE as retaliation for Armenian cavalry deserting Mark Antony against Parthia. Antony thus set out to conquer Armenia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Augustus' Eastern policy</span> Augustus Eastern policy at the time of the principate

Augustus' Eastern policy represents the political-strategic framework of the eastern imperial borders of the Roman Empire at the time of Augustus' principate, following the occupation of Egypt at the end of the civil war between Octavian and Mark Antony.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg I
  2. 1 2 Plutarch, Caesar 58.6
  3. 1 2 3 Suetonius, The Life of Julius Caesar 44
  4. 1 2 Plutarch, Caesar 58.6,7
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Townend 1983 p. 601-606
  6. 1 2 3 Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg V
  7. 1 2 Appian, The Civil Wars 2.110
  8. ↑ Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg VI
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Poirot, John J. (2014). The Romano-Parthian Cold War: Julio-ClaudianForeign Policy in the First Century CE and Tacitus'Annales. Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons. pp. 56–58.
  10. ↑ Woods, "Carisius, Acisculus", pp. 253–255.
  11. ↑ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 475, 476, 483–485.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Heitland 2013 p.469–471.
  13. 1 2 Cassius Dio, Roman History 43.51
  14. 1 2 Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Adegi Graphics LLC. pp. 137–139. ISBN   9780543927491.
  15. 1 2 3 Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg VII
  16. 1 2 3 Pelling, Christopher (2011). Plutarch Caesar: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. OUP Oxford. pp. 438–439. ISBN   9780198149040.
  17. ↑ Strauss, Barry (2016-03-22). The Death of Caesar: The Story of History's Most Famous Assassination. Simon and Schuster. pp. 55, 56, 68. ISBN   9781451668810.
  18. ↑ Plutarch, Caesar 58.8
  19. ↑ Nicolaus of Damascus, Life of Augustus 26
  20. ↑ Stadter, Philip A. "Plutarch's Comparison of Pericles and Fabius Maximus". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 16 (1): 77–85.
  21. 1 2 Buszard, Bradley (2008). "Caesar's Ambition: A Combined Reading of Plutarch's Alexander-Caesar and Pyrrhus-Marius". Transactions of the American Philological Association. 138 (1): 185–215. doi:10.1353/apa.0.0004. ISSN   2575-7199. S2CID   162316551.
  22. ↑ McDermott, W. C. (1982). "Caesar's Projected Dacian-Parthian Expedition". Ancient Society (13): 223–232. ISSN   0066-1619.
  23. 1 2 Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg II
  24. 1 2 Griffin, Miriam (2009). A Companion to Julius Caesar. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 69–70. ISBN   9781444308457.
  25. ↑ Campbell, Brian (2002). Rich, John; Rich, John; Shipley, Graham (eds.). "War and diplomacy: Rome and Parthia, 31 BC–AD 235". War and Society in the Roman World. Chapter 9. doi:10.4324/9780203075548. ISBN   9780203075548.
  26. ↑ Plutarch, Caesar 58.7
  27. ↑ Plutarch, Caesar 60
  28. ↑ Strauss, Barry (2016-03-22). The Death of Caesar: The Story of History's Most Famous Assassination. Simon and Schuster. pp. 56, 68. ISBN   9781451668810.
  29. ↑ Malitz, Caesars Partherkrieg IV
  30. ↑ Bunson, Matthew (2014-05-14). Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire. Infobase Publishing. p. 39. ISBN   9781438110271.

Sources

Ancient

Modern

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.