Kleppe v. New Mexico

Last updated

Kleppe v. New Mexico
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued March 23, 1976
Decided June 17, 1976
Full case name Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior v. New Mexico, et al.
Citations426 U.S. 529 ( more )
96 S. Ct. 2285; 49 L. Ed. 2d 34
Case history
PriorNew Mexico v. Morton, 406 F. Supp. 1237 (D.N.M. 1975)
Holding
The Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 was a constitutional exercise of congressional power under the property clause at least insofar as it was applied to prohibit the New Mexico Livestock Board from entering upon the public lands of the United States and removing wild burros under the New Mexico Estray Law.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr.  · Potter Stewart
Byron White  · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun  · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist  · John P. Stevens
Case opinion
MajorityMarshall, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. IV, § 3, cl. 2; 16 U.S.C.   § 1331, et seq.

Kleppe v. New Mexico, 426 U.S. 529 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court decision that unanimously held the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971, passed in 1971 by the United States Congress to protect these animals from "capture, branding, harassment, or death", to be a constitutional exercise of congressional power. In February 1974, the New Mexico Livestock Board rounded up and sold 19 unbranded burros from Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land. When the BLM demanded the animals' return, the state filed suit claiming that the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act was unconstitutional, claiming the federal government did not have the power to control animals in federal lands unless they were items in interstate commerce or causing damage to the public lands.

Contents

Background

In 1971, Congress passed the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  92–195 , 85  Stat.   649 , enacted December 15, 1971 (later codified at 16 U.S.C.   § 1331, et seq.) (WFRHBA). The act covered the management, protection and study of "unbranded and unclaimed horses and burros on public lands in the United States." [1] [lower-alpha 1] The act requires the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to protect and manage wild horses as a component of public property of the United States. [3] Free ranging horses are to be protected from "capture, branding, harassment, or death." [4] The managing agencies are the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for Interior and the Forest Service (USFS) for Agriculture. [5]

The state of New Mexico challenged the federal government's authority to manage wild horses within the boundaries of New Mexico. [6] A New Mexican rancher, Kelly Stephenson, found wild burros grazing on his land and on the federal land where he had a grazing permit. [7] [lower-alpha 2] Stephenson complained to BLM, and when BLM refused to remove the burros, to the New Mexico Livestock Board. [9] The New Mexico Livestock Board, acting under state law [10] then seized nineteen burros from federal land and sold them at public auction. [11] The BLM asserted jurisdiction under the WFRHBA and demanded the return of the animals. [12] New Mexico then filed suit in the federal district court, claiming that the federal law was unconstitutional. [13]

District court

The case was heard by a three judge panel consisting of Oliver Seth, Edwin Mechem, and Harry Payne. [14] The panel declared the WFRHBA unconstitutional, stating that its authority was derived from the "territorial clause," Article IV of the United States Constitution, [15] but that animals do not become federal property simply by being on federal land. [16] Citing cases where the federal government regulated deer populations based on damage to federal lands, but arguing that the WFRHBA presented no evidence that horses or burros were inflicting damage, [lower-alpha 3] the court enjoined the federal government from enforcing the Act, holding that the statute unconstitutionally exceeded the federal government's authority by protecting free-roaming horses and burros, rather than the land upon which they lived. [18]

Supreme Court

Justice Marshall, author of the opinion Thurgood-marshall-2.jpg
Justice Marshall, author of the opinion

Justice Thurgood Marshall delivered the opinion of a unanimous court. The Court interpreted the property clause broadly and found the WFRHBA a constitutional exercise of Congressional authority, holding, "the Property Clause also gives Congress the power to protect wildlife on the public lands, state law notwithstanding." [19] wrote that the "'complete power' that Congress has over public lands necessarily includes the power to regulate and protect the wildlife living there." [20] In addition, the Court said that Congress may enact legislation governing federal lands pursuant to the property clause and "when Congress so acts, federal legislation necessarily overrides conflicting state laws under the supremacy clause." [21]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The number of wild horses had decreased from an estimated 2,000,000 to as low as 9,500. [2] [ dubious – discuss ]
  2. ↑ Stephenson's issue appears to be that the burros were eating feed supplements that were intended for his cattle. [8]
  3. ↑ This finding is particularly ironic given that the BLM's definition of a Herd Management Area (HMA) and calculation of Appropriate Management Level (AML) is based upon the ability of the habitat to support a given population of horses or burros. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Article Four of the United States Constitution</span> Portion of the US Constitution regarding states

Article Four of the United States Constitution outlines the relationship between the various states, as well as the relationship between each state and the United States federal government. It also empowers Congress to admit new states and administer the territories and other federal lands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureau of Land Management</span> Agency within the US Department of the Interior

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is an agency within the United States Department of the Interior responsible for administering U.S. federal lands. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the BLM oversees more than 247.3 million acres (1,001,000 km2) of land, or one-eighth of the United States's total landmass.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mustang</span> Free-roaming horse of the Western US

The mustang is a free-roaming horse of the Western United States, descended from horses brought to the Americas by the Spanish conquistadors. Mustangs are often referred to as wild horses, but because they are descended from once-domesticated animals, they are actually feral horses. The original mustangs were Colonial Spanish horses, but many other breeds and types of horses contributed to the modern mustang, now resulting in varying phenotypes. Some free-roaming horses are relatively unchanged from the original Spanish stock, most strongly represented in the most isolated populations.

The Nonintercourse Act is the collective name given to six statutes passed by the United States Congress in 1790, 1793, 1796, 1799, 1802, and 1834 to set boundaries of American Indian reservations. The various acts were also intended to regulate commerce between White Americans and citizens of Indigenous nations. The most notable provisions of the act regulate the inalienability of aboriginal title in the United States, a continuing source of litigation for almost 200 years. The prohibition on purchases of Indian lands without the approval of the federal government has its origins in the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal lands</span> Land in the United States which is owned by the federal government

Federal lands are lands in the United States owned and managed by the federal government. Pursuant to the Property Clause of the United States Constitution, Congress has the power to retain, buy, sell, and regulate federal lands, such as by limiting cattle grazing on them. These powers have been recognized in a long series of United States Supreme Court decisions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feral horse</span> Free horses of domesticated horse ancestry

A feral horse is a free-roaming horse of domesticated stock. As such, a feral horse is not a wild animal in the sense of an animal without domesticated ancestors. However, some populations of feral horses are managed as wildlife, and these horses often are popularly called "wild" horses. Feral horses are descended from domestic horses that strayed, escaped, or were deliberately released into the wild and remained to survive and reproduce there. Away from humans, over time, these animals' patterns of behavior revert to behavior more closely resembling that of wild horses. Some horses that live in a feral state but may be occasionally handled or managed by humans, particularly if privately owned, are referred to as "semi-feral".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Velma Bronn Johnston</span>

Velma Bronn Johnston, also known as Wild Horse Annie, was an American animal welfare activist. She led a campaign to stop the eradication of mustangs and free-roaming burros from public lands. She was instrumental in passing legislation to stop using aircraft and land vehicles from inhumanely capturing wild horses and burros.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal enclave</span> Parcel of land which is within a state but under federal jurisdiction

In United States law, a federal enclave is a parcel of federal property within a state that is under the "Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States". These enclaves are used for the many different functions of the United States federal government, and include post offices, arsenals, dams, road, etc., and usually are owned, secured and administered by the U S. federal government itself. The United States in many cases has received similar jurisdictional authority over privately owned properties which it leases, or privately owned and occupied properties which are located within the exterior boundaries of a large area as to which a state has ceded jurisdiction to the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Madeleine A. Pickens</span> Iraqi American businesswoman and philanthropist

Madeleine Anne Pickens is a businesswoman and philanthropist who has lived in the United States since 1969. She is a developer of and stockholder in the Del Mar Country Club in Rancho Santa Fe, California, and the owner of the Mustang Monument: Wild Horse Eco-Resort near Wells, Nevada and the founder of Saving America's Mustangs. She is also a thoroughbred racehorse owner and breeder. She is the widow of American businessman Allen E. Paulson and former wife of multi-millionaire T. Boone Pickens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aboriginal title in the United States</span> First country to recognize aboriginal title

The United States was the first jurisdiction to acknowledge the common law doctrine of aboriginal title. Native American tribes and nations establish aboriginal title by actual, continuous, and exclusive use and occupancy for a "long time." Individuals may also establish aboriginal title, if their ancestors held title as individuals. Unlike other jurisdictions, the content of aboriginal title is not limited to historical or traditional land uses. Aboriginal title may not be alienated, except to the federal government or with the approval of Congress. Aboriginal title is distinct from the lands Native Americans own in fee simple and occupy under federal trust.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narragansett land claim</span> Litigation of aboriginal title in Rhode Island, US

The Narragansett land claim was one of the first litigations of aboriginal title in the United States in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida (1974), or Oneida I, decision. The Narragansett claimed a few thousand acres of land in and around Charlestown, Rhode Island, challenging a variety of early 19th century land transfers as violations of the Nonintercourse Act, suing both the state and private land owners.

The Pryor Mountains Wild Horse Range is a refuge for a historically significant herd of free-roaming mustangs, the Pryor Mountain mustang, feral horses colloquially called "wild horses", located in the Pryor Mountains of Montana and Wyoming in the United States. The range has an area of 39,650 acres (160.5 km2) and was established in 1968 along the Montana–Wyoming border as the first protected refuge dedicated exclusively for mustangs. It was the second feral horse refuge in the United States. About a quarter of the refuge lies within the Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area. A group of federal agencies, led by the Bureau of Land Management, administers the range.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971</span> 1971 Act of Congress

The Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (WFRHBA), is an Act of Congress, signed into law by President Richard M. Nixon on December 18, 1971. The act covered the management, protection and study of "unbranded and unclaimed horses and burros on public lands in the United States."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pryor Mountain mustang</span> American breed of horse

The Pryor Mountain mustang is a substrain of mustang considered to be genetically unique and one of the few strains of horses verified by DNA analysis to be descended from the original Colonial Spanish horses brought to the Americas by the Spanish. They live on the Pryor Mountains Wild Horse Range located in the Pryor Mountains of Montana and Wyoming in the United States, and are the only mustang herd remaining in Montana, and one of sixteen in Wyoming. They are protected by the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (WFRHBA) and managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), who has set the optimum herd number at 120 animals. Genetic studies have revealed that the herd exhibits a high degree of genetic diversity and a low degree of inbreeding, and BLM has acknowledged the genetic uniqueness of the herd. Pryor Mountain Mustangs are relatively small horses, exhibit a natural ambling gait, and domesticated Pryor Mountain mustangs are known for their strength, sure-footedness and stamina. The Pryor Mountains Wild Horse Range is one of the most accessible areas to view feral horse herds in the United States and tourism to the area has increased in recent years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free-roaming horse management in North America</span>

Management of free-roaming feral and semi-feral horses, on various public or tribal lands in North America is accomplished under the authority of law, either by the government of jurisdiction or efforts of private groups. In western Canada, management is a provincial matter, with several associations and societies helping to manage wild horses in British Columbia and Alberta. In Nova Scotia, and various locations in the United States, management is under the jurisdiction of various federal agencies. The largest population of free-roaming horses is found in the Western United States. Here, most of them are protected under the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (WFRH&BA), and their management is primarily undertaken by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), but also by the U. S. Forest Service (USFS)

Grazing rights in Nevada covers a number of rangeland Federal and state laws and regulations applicable to the state of Nevada. Rangelands are distinguished from pasture lands because they grow primarily native vegetation, rather than plants established by humans. Ranchers may lease or obtain permits to use portions of this public rangeland and pay a fee based on the number and type of livestock and the period for which they are on the land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mustang Challenge</span> Annual horse competition in Las Vegas, NV

The Mustang Champions Western Challenge, or simply the Mustang Challenge, held in Las Vegas, is an equestrian competition that showcases the American Mustang. It is being held annually in July by the Mustang Champions organization, in conjunction with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. It is a sister event to the Mustang Classic held in Lexington, Kentucky during the fall, and both are intended to complement the Extreme Mustang Makeover events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mustang Heritage Foundation</span> Organization dedicated to promoting the welfare for American Mustangs

The Mustang Heritage Foundation, is an American organization dedicated to supporting the welfare of feral horses (mustangs) and donkeys (burros). The organization works closely with the US Bureau of Land Management to support its efforts.

References

  1. ↑ 16 U.S.C.   § 1332.
  2. ↑ Nadia Aksentijevich, Note: An American Icon in Limbo: How Clarifying the Standing Doctrine Could Free Wild Horses and Empower Advocates, 41 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 399, 402 (2014).
  3. ↑ Aksentijevich, at 403.
  4. ↑ 16 U.S.C.   § 1331.
  5. ↑ Roberto Iraola, Essay: The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act Of 1971, 35 Envtl. L. 1049, 1051-52 (Fall 2005).
  6. ↑ Blake Shepard, Article and Comment: The Scope Of Congress' Constitutional Power Under the Property Clause: Regulating Non-Federal Property to Further the Purposes of National Parks and Wilderness Areas, 11 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 479, 499 (Spring 1984).
  7. ↑ New Mexico v. Morton, 406F. Supp.1237 , 1237( D.N.M. 1975).
  8. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237.
  9. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237.
  10. ↑ New Mexico Estray Law, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 47-14-1 to 47-14-10 (1966).
  11. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237; Shepard, at 499.
  12. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237; Shepard, at 499.
  13. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237; Shepard, at 499.
  14. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1237.
  15. ↑ U.S. Const. art. IV, § 3, cl. 2.
  16. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1238.
  17. ↑ "Nevada–Wild Horses and Burros". Bureau of Land Management. Archived from the original on June 16, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2015.
  18. ↑ Morton, 406 F. Supp. at 1238-39.
  19. ↑ Kleppe v. New Mexico, 426 U.S. 529, 546 (1976).
  20. ↑ Kleppe, 426 U.S., at 541-42.
  21. ↑ Kleppe, 426 U.S. at 543

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.