L&YR Class 2 (Aspinall)

Last updated

L&YR Class 2 (Aspinall)
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
Designer John Aspinall
Builder Beyer, Peacock and Company
Build date1888-1889
Total produced30
Specifications
Configuration:
   Whyte 4-4-0
Gauge 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
Leading dia. 3 ft 0+12 in (0.927 m)
Driver dia.6 ft 0 in (1.829 m)
Length24 ft 7+12 in (7.506 m)
Adhesive weight 29.50 long tons (29.97 t)
Loco weight43.25 long tons (43.94 t)
44.6 long tons (45.3 t)
Fuel typeCoal
Boiler pressure160 psi (1.10 MPa)
180 psi (1.24 MPa) [lower-alpha 1]
Cylinders 2
Cylinder size 18 in × 26 in (457 mm × 660 mm)
Valve gear Joy
Performance figures
Tractive effort 15,910 lbf (70.8 kN)
17,900 lbf (79.6 kN) [lower-alpha 1] [ citation needed ]
Career
Operators L&YR, LMS
Power classLMS 1P
NicknamesPeacocks [1]
Withdrawn1901, 1930-1935
DispositionAll scrapped
Details as built except where stated: [2]

The L&YR Class 2 (Aspinall) was a class of 4-4-0 steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway.

Contents

Design and construction

When Aspinall joined the L&YR in 1886 he was able to demonstrate to board needed 1,114 locomotives to operate the required 22¼ million annual mileage and was thus 151 short. [3] [4] [lower-alpha 2] [lower-alpha 3]

For express passenger engines Aspinall chose to stick with developing the L&YR Barton Wright 4-4-0 with 6 feet 0 inches (1.83 m) driving wheels. To cope with the locomotive shortage and new route to Liverpool the L&YR ordered a further batch of 16 from Vulcan Foundry who had built the most recent order for 20. Quoted at £1,830 they were delivered in 1887 and incorporated longer wheelbase, increased boiler pressure, larger cylinders and bogie wheels of just over 3 ft. [5] [6] [4] [7]

Aspinall had inspirations to increase the size of the driving wheels to with the objective achieve to speed advantages demonstrated by the GNR Stirling 4-2-2 and the LY&R Ramsbottom 2-4-0s. [8] [9] These would come with the Aspinall 7ft 3in 4-4-0s in 1891 as L&YR's own new Horwich Works came into operation. [10] In the interim a batch of 30 with 6 ft driving wheels were ordered from Beyer Peacock. [11] The L&YR had strong connections to Beyer Peacock at the time with John Ramsbottom being a both a consultant on the new Horwich Works and a director of Beyer Peacock. [12] The L&YR was able to negotiate a priced fixed at £1,990 for two years and to delay initial deliveries which both helped finances and enabled design refinements to the boiler and motion. [13]

The Beyer Locomotives the L&YR standardized Joy valve gear, and equipped with the swing-link bogie. [lower-alpha 4] Other features such as 3 feet 0+12 inch (0.927 m) bogie wheels, 8 feet 11 inches (2.718 m) coupled wheelbase 160 psi boiler were the same as the last batch from Vulcan Foundry. [14]

Rebuilds and modifications

The supplied built-up chimneys were replaced with the LY&R standard Horwich parallel type by 1900. [15] Several had their boiler pressure increased to 180 psi in the early 1900s but in all but three cases it was reduced back to 160 psi by the grouping. [16] Numbers 982, 999 and 1003 were rebuilt by George Hughes between 1910 and 1915 with saturated Belpaire firebox. [17] [16] Some engines feature extended smokeboxs on saturated boilers. [18] After World War I there was tendency to switch tenders with those of other classes and tender coal rails were seemingly randomly fitted although there does appear to be some logic pertaining to the particular duties an individual engine was expected to perform. [19]

Service

Marshall notes the class were popular throughout their network. [2]

The class were initially based mainly in Lancashire mainly working semi-fast passenger trains from Manchester, Colne, Liverpool, Southport, Blackpool and Bradford. Bradford based engines were later displaced by Apsinalls 7ft 3in 4-4-0s [2] [20]

29 passed to the London, Midland and Scottish Railway at the grouping in 1923. [11]

Numbering

L&YR and LMS numbering. [21]
L&YR nos.LMS nos.Notes
922, 92410100-10101The two survivors from the last Vulcan Foundry batch which had many similarities to the Beyer Peacock batch and were numbered at the start of this sequence by the LMS.
978-98610102-10110
988-100710111-10130The sequence gap is due to the loss of 987 in the Tormorden crash

Withdrawal

The LMS, which soon moved to a Midland Derby bias, adopted a "scrap and build" as opposed to a "rebuild" engine policy and the Fowler 2P 4-4-0 being was as the LMS standard light passenger engine. [22] Withdrawals began in 1930 and the last locomotive was withdrawn in 1935. [23] None have been preserved.

Incidents

No 987 was scrapped following a collision at Tormorden on 4 November 1901. No 987 was hauling a Manchester to York passenger train composed of only three bogie coaches due to earlier operational problems. The train mistakenly routed onto the Burnley branch in dense fog conditions where it collided with pilot engine No. 809 pushing it 640 yards (590 m) along on an uphill gradient. Both engines were badly damaged; all four locomotive crew were injured, two severely; and four passengers were also slightly injured. [24]

Notes

  1. 1 2 Information relates to rebuilt locomotives
  2. Based on LNWR average annual engine mileage of 19,500
  3. The company was operating a commonplace one team per engine policy at that time to avoid issues of split responsibility
  4. Lane (2010), pp. 45, 50 implies by omission the 1887 Vulcan Foundry 4-4-0 batch did not have swing link bogies. Aspinall would have been familiar with swing link bogies introduced by Inchicore with the GS&WR Class 2

Related Research Articles

George Hughes was an English locomotive engineer, and chief mechanical engineer (CME) of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) and the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS).

Henry Albert Hoy (1855–1910) was a locomotive engineer with the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR). Hoy was born on 13 January 1855 in London, and educated at King Edward VI's Grammar School in St Albans, and at St John's College, Liverpool University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LMS Hughes Crab</span> British steam locomotive, built 1926–1932

The London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) Hughes Crab or Horwich Mogul is a class of mixed-traffic 2-6-0 steam locomotive built between 1926 and 1932. They are noted for their appearance with large steeply-angled cylinders to accommodate a restricted loading gauge.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horwich Works</span>

Horwich Works was a railway works built in 1886 by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (LYR) in Horwich, near Bolton, in North West England when the company moved from its original works at Miles Platting, Manchester.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 5</span> Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway 2-4-2T passenger tank locomotive introduced in 1889

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Class 5 were 2-4-2T steam locomotives designed by Chief Mechanical Engineer (CME) John Aspinall and introduced from 1889 for local passenger work. Later batches included progressive modifications such as extended coal bunkers and belpaire fireboxes. The final batch built from 1911 to 1914 under George Hughes incorporating superheated boilers and belpaire firebox gave increased tractive effort, others were also rebuilt to this standard. When Hughes introduced his classification system in 1919, the more powerful superheated locomotives were designated Class 6. The final examples were withdrawn in 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 21</span>

The L&YR Class 21 is a class of small 0-4-0ST steam locomotive built by the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway for shunting duties. They were nicknamed Pugs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 27</span>

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Class 27 is a class of 0-6-0 steam locomotive designed for freight work on the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 8</span>

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) Class 8 was a four-cylinder 4-6-0 express passenger locomotive designed by George Hughes introduced in 1908.

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) Class 7 was a class of Atlantic passenger steam locomotives to the design of John Aspinall. Forty were built between 1899 and 1902. They were known as "High-Flyers" as a result of having a high-pitched boiler that was supposed to increase stability at speed. All passed into London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) ownership on the grouping of 1923, becoming the LMS's only Atlantic tender engine class. The LMS gave them the power classification 2P. Withdrawals started in 1926, and the last was withdrawn in 1934. None were preserved.

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) operated two classes of twenty steam railmotors in total.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 32</span> Class of 5 British 0-8-2T locomotives

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Class 32 was a small class of 0-8-2T steam locomotives, intended for heavy shunting and banking duties.

The L&YR Class 30 was a class of 0-8-0 steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway. The class was designed by John Aspinall and introduced in 1900.

The L&YR Class 26 was a class of 20 2-6-2T passenger steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway designed by Henry Hoy and introduced in 1903. Most passed to the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) at the grouping in 1923 though they were withdrawn soon afterwards with none remaining in service after 1926.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 24</span>

The L&YR Class 24 was a class of short-wheelbase 0-6-0T steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR). It was designed by Aspinall and introduced in 1897 for shunting duties. Twenty locomotives were built, but six were withdrawn between 1917 and 1922.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 3</span>

The L&YR Class 3 was a class of 4-4-0 steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway introduced in 1891 with forty being built. George Hughes rebuilt six locomotives with superheaters between 1908 and 1909, they were later designated L&YR Class 4. All passed to the London, Midland and Scottish Railway at the grouping in 1923 but were withdrawn by 1930.

The L&YR 2-10-0 was a prospective design for a class of 2-10-0 steam locomotives on the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway. Initial designs were made by George Hughes between 1913 and 1914, but none of the class were built. If they had been, these would have been the UK's first 10-coupled locomotives in regular service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LNWR Newton Class</span>

The LNWR Newton Class was a class of ninety-six 2-4-0 steam locomotives built by the London and North Western Railway at their Crewe Works between 1866 and 1873.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR 111 class</span> Class of 72 British 0-4-4T locomotives

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (LY&R) Class 1110-4-4T were designed by Kitson and Company for William Barton Wright, who had a requirement for a short-distance passenger tank locomotive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Barton Wright 4-4-0</span> Class of British 4-4-0 locomotives

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) Barton Wright 4-4-0 was four-coupled eight-wheeled bogie express engine which entered service in 1880.

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) Barton Wright 0-6-2T were tank engines introduced by Barton Wright between 1877 and 1883. This was the first use of the 0-6-2T type in Britain.

References

  1. Lane (2010), p. 52.
  2. 1 2 3 Marshall (1972), p. 131.
  3. Bulleid (1967), p. 82.
  4. 1 2 Marshall (1970), p. 214.
  5. Bulleid (1967), pp. 82–83.
  6. Lane (2010), p. 50.
  7. Marshall (1972), p. 128.
  8. Bulleid (1967), pp. 102.
  9. Marshall (1970), p. 93.
  10. Bulleid (1967), p. 103,113.
  11. 1 2 Casserley & Johnston (1966), p. 102.
  12. Bulleid (1967), p. 79, 83.
  13. Bulleid (1967), p. 83.
  14. Lane (2010), pp. 50–51.
  15. Lane (2010), p. 52–53.
  16. 1 2 Lane (2010), p. 51.
  17. Marshall (1972), p. 131–132.
  18. Mason (1953), p. 12–13.
  19. Lane (2010), p. 51–53.
  20. Lane (2010), p. 131.
  21. Marshall (1972), p. 240, 242.
  22. Whitehouse & Thomas (1987), p. 48.
  23. Marshall (1972), p. 242.
  24. Druitt (1901), pp. 63–64, 66–68.

Bibliography