L&YR Class 26

Last updated

L&YR Class 26
Railwaysofworld00protrich-p379-LYR-Hughes-262T.jpg
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
Designer Henry Hoy
Builder Horwich Works
Order numberLot 49
Serial number861–880
Build dateOctober 1903 – August 1904
Total produced20
Specifications
Configuration:
   Whyte 2-6-2 T
   UIC 1′C1′ n2t
Gauge 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
Leading dia. 3 ft 7+34 in (1.111 m)
Driver dia.5 ft 8 in (1.727 m)
Trailing dia. 3 ft 7+34 in (1.111 m)
Length42 ft 4 in (12.9 m)
Loco weight77.5 long tons (78.7 t)
Fuel typeCoal
Fuel capacity3.75 long tons (3.81 t)
Water cap.2,000 imp gal (9,100 L; 2,400 US gal)
Firebox:
  Grate area26.0 sq ft (2.42 m2)
Boiler pressure175 lbf/in2 (1.21 MPa)
Heating surface2,038.6 sq ft (189.39 m2)
Cylinders Two, inside
Cylinder size 19 in × 26 in (483 mm × 660 mm)
Valve gear Joy
Performance figures
Tractive effort 19,797 lbf (88.1 kN)
Career
Operators
Power classLMS: 3F
WithdrawnDecember 1920 – August 1926
DispositionAll scrapped

The L&YR Class 26 was a class of 20 2-6-2 T passenger steam locomotives of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway designed by Henry Hoy and introduced in 1903. Most passed to the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) at the grouping in 1923 though they were withdrawn soon afterwards with none remaining in service after 1926. [1]

Contents

Design and construction

Hoy intended the class to work Manchester, Rochdale, Oldham and Bury services where the Aspinall 2-4-2T Class 5 struggled with the steeper gradients and heavier trains. They were somewhat of an evolutionary design, due to their larger size with six-coupled wheels and the Belpaire firebox used on the Class 7 High Flyers and Coal engine 0-8-0 types. [2]

Service

On introduction in 1903 they were allocated to Liverpool to Southport workings to cover a temporary shortage of electric stock. They were subsequently placed on their intended routes where they were initially successful, [2] but problems shortly emerged. Their heavy weight damaged track and their long rigid wheelbase put pressure on rails in sharply-curved sidings. The centre wheels had their flanges removed which eased some issues but increased the risk of derailment on slightly misaligned track and most notably at junctions. This is because flangeless driving wheels work better on smaller wheels with short spacing. Their side tanks tended to leak badly and they gained a reputation for poor stopping ability. [3]

When George Hughes upgraded to the Class 5 2-4-2T with superheaters they were able to replace the Class 26 and the latter were removed from passenger services in 1913. They were then placed on banking and shunting duties with water pickup equipment and coal rail removed for increased visibility. They performed poorly with their 5 ft 8 in (1.73 m) driving wheels and flangeless centre wheels. [3]

Numbering

Table of locomotives [4]
L&YR no.BuiltLMS no.WithdrawnNotes
202Oct 1903Dec 1920
387Nov 190311700May 1925
404Nov 1903Dec 1920
454Nov 190311701Jan 1926
467Dec 190311702May 1925
527Jan 190411703Mar 1926
712Feb 190411704Aug 1926
744Feb 190411705Aug 1926
837Mar 190411706Jun 1925
125Mar 1904May 1923
1441Apr 190411707Aug 1926
1442Apr 190411708Jul 1925
1443May 190411709Jun 1925
1444May 190411710Jan 1925
1445Jun 190411711Sep 1924
1446Jun 190411712Aug 1926
1447Jul 190411713Feb 1926
1448Jul 190411714Feb 1925
1449Jul 1904117151924
1450Aug 190411716Aug 1926

Withdrawal

One was withdrawn in 1920 with irreparably cracked frames. Three (Nos 202, 404 and 125) were withdrawn in 1923 before being allocated an LMS number. Ultimately only Nos. 11704 and 11711 carried their LMS number in service and all members of the class were withdrawn by 1926. [5] All were scrapped by 1928.

References

  1. Casserley & Johnston 1966, p. 120.
  2. 1 2 Lane 2010, p. 116.
  3. 1 2 Lane 2010, pp. 116–117.
  4. Baxter 1982, p. 85.
  5. Lane 2010, p. 119.

Sources