Labor rights in American meatpacking industry

Last updated

Labor rights in the American meatpacking industry are largely regulated by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which regulates union organization.[ citation needed ] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulates the safety and health conditions applicable to workers in the American meat packing industry. [1] [2] According to scholars of the American meat packing industry, despite federal regulation through OSHA and industry oversight, workers in meat production plants have little agency and inadequate protections. [1] [2] Workers in the industry perform difficult jobs in dangerous conditions, and are at significant risk for physical and psychological harm. [1] [2] [3] In addition to high rates of injury, workers are at risk of losing their jobs when they are injured or for attempting to organize and bargain collectively. [2] Several of studies of the industry have found immigrant workers—"an increasing percentage of the workforce in the industry." [2] [1]

Contents

Characteristics of the American meat production industry

Within the meat production industry, "meatpacking" is defined as "all manufacturing of meat products including the processing of animals." [1] This includes production of beef, pork, poultry, and fish. [1] The scope of the American meat production industry is large; it slaughters and processes over 10 billion animals per year. [4]

Cattle carcasses in a slaughterhouse Slaughterhouse cattle bodies.jpg
Cattle carcasses in a slaughterhouse

Since 2004, four companies essentially control the American meat production industry. Broken down, the companies managed 81% of the beef production, 59% of the pork production and 50% of the poultry market. [5] [6] Within the poultry industry, Tyson and Perdue control each stage of chicken production, from raising the chicks to shipping the meat to grocery stores. [6]

The number of animals butchered in the meat production industry appears to be growing. In 2010, nearly 10.2 billion land animals were slaughtered and raised for food in the United States. [4] According to a report Archived 2016-05-13 at the Wayback Machine by the Farm Animal Rights Movement, based on data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), these numbers indicate a 1.7% increase from the 2009 data. [4] There was a 0.9% increase in U.S. population between 2009 and 2010, "meaning that animals [slaughtered] per-capita increased slightly" [4] by 0.8%.

Meatpacker demographics

While American agriculture has largely been dependent on migrant workers for the last century, thousands of immigrants, mainly from Mexico, Guatemala, and El Salvador, now travel north to work in slaughterhouses and meat processing plants. [3] According to a study in the Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, "most meatpacking employees are poor, many are immigrants struggling to survive, and most are now employed in rural locations." [1] In 1998, the Immigration and Naturalization Service estimated that about a quarter of meatpacking workers in Nebraska and Iowa were illegal immigrants. [3] The USDA published similar numbers, estimating the percentage of Hispanic meat-processing workers rising from less than 10% in 1980 to almost 30% in 2000. [7] The lack of rights of undocumented workers makes them invisible to the public. [1] In addition, following the 2002 Supreme Court decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board , "immigration law takes precedence over labor law," which challenges undocumented workers' ability to get compensation benefits. [1]

Slaughterhouse employee turnover rates tend to be extremely high. [3] One company, ConAgra Red Meat, reported a 100% annual turnover rate in the 1990s. [3] Such high turnover rates makes it harder for the workforce to unionize and, consequently, easier for the industry to control its workers. [3]

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that in 2000, 148,100 people worked in meatpacking and over 250,000 worked in poultry processing. [1] Despite the growth of the meat production industry, slaughterhouse workers' wages have been decreasing rapidly. [5] Slaughterhouse workers' wages were historically higher than the average manufacturing wage. This trend reversed in 1983 when slaughterhouse worker wages fell below the average manufacturing wage. By 2002, slaughterhouse workers' wages were 24% below the average manufacturing wage. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2006, the median wage for slaughterhouse workers was $10.43 per hour which comes out to $21,690 per year. [8]

Workers' rights in industry

Historical context

Chicago's meatpacking district: the Union Stock Yards in 1947 Livestock chicago 1947.jpg
Chicago's meatpacking district: the Union Stock Yards in 1947

In the 19th century, the south side of Chicago became the main home of American slaughterhouses. [9] In order to avoid paying higher wages for a skilled workforce, the larger slaughterhouses in Chicago established an (dis)assembly line process; the mass production system eliminated the need for skilled labor. [9]

The original slaughterhouse workers were largely recent immigrants of Irish, German, and Scandinavian background. [9] In the slaughterhouses, they worked in difficult conditions. Not only were they required to slaughter and dismember enormous numbers of animals each day, but they were exposed to poor environmental conditions, including leaks of contaminated water, liquid waste and sewage across the floors, and poorly lit, cold rooms. [9] Both injuries and illness were commonplace among workers. [9] In addition, most workers lived in slums next to the slaughterhouses. [9]

In the early 1880s, workers attempted to organize, calling for higher wages and better working conditions. [9] In response, slaughterhouse owners used ethnic differences to maintain control: they "recruited vulnerable Poles, Serbs, Croatians, Slovaks, and other recent Southern and Eastern European immigrants as workers." [9] When the white workers were able to organize and go on strike in 1894, slaughterhouse owners instead began recruiting African American workers to break the strike. [9]

Upton Sinclair's polemical 1906 novel The Jungle revealed the alleged abuses of the meat production industry, and was a factor in the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act (1906) and the Federal Meat Inspection Act (1906). [2] However, representatives of the Federal Bureau of Animal Industry reported to Congress that Sinclair's novel was inaccurate in many particulars, was "intentionally misleading and false", and furthermore engaged in "willful and deliberate misrepresentations of fact". [10] The American public "paid little attention to the...abusive working conditions and treatment" workers were sometimes subjected to. [2] It took large-scale unionizing by the newly established Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) and the effects of the National Labor Relations Act (1935) to improve working conditions for slaughterhouse workers. [2]

From the 1930s to the 1970s, pay and conditions improved for meatpacking workers. [2] According to a report by the Human Rights Watch, "master contracts covering the industry raised wages and safety standards." [2] However, standards began decreasing in the 1980s as companies began relocating to rural areas and certain companies became "industry powerhouses." [2] Iowa Beef Processors (IBP) especially transformed the meat production process so that, in each stage, workers have a mindless, repetitive movement to complete "in what the industry calls a disassembly-line process." [2] IBP and peer companies increased the speed of the lines and decreased wages. [2]

Even if companies chose not to relocate, many companies simply shut down their plants, let their established and organized workers go, and reopened with a non-unionized, immigrant workforce. [2] Employers strongly resisted attempts workers made to unionize in relocated or reopened plants; the recent history of plant closures gave employer threats significant credibility. [2] A Human Rights Watch report on conditions of meat and poultry plants asserted that "as the twentieth century turned into the twenty-first, the meatpacking industry was returning to the jungle" Sinclair wrote about a century before. [2]

Industry working conditions

Workplace conditions have made meatpacking an extremely dangerous job. [1] [2] [3] The repetitive motions place severe stress on workers' hands, wrists, arms, shoulders and backs. [2] In addition, the disassembly lines move extremely quickly; [2] [3] according to investigative journalist Eric Schlosser, "one of the leading determinants of the injury rate at a slaughterhouse today is the speed of the disassembly line." [3]

The more quickly a line moves, the more difficult it is for a worker to keep up and the higher the chance of injury. [3] To contextualize the speed of disassembly lines today, the old meatpacking plants in Chicago would process about 50 cattle an hour. The newer plants in the 1980s would process about 175 cattle an hour. [3] Today, in the 2018s, some plants process up to 400 cattle an hour. [3] Not only do the disassembly lines move quickly, but workers also reported constant pressure from their supervisors to keep up to pace the line set. [2] According to the Human Rights Watch, federal regulation of speed of disassembly lines only considers two factors: avoiding adulterating the meat and poultry, and not obstructing a plant's productivity. [2]

In his book Fast Food Nation , Schlosser also asserted that workers are pressured to not report injuries. [3] Because the bonuses of managers and foremen are often tied to the injury rates at their plant, slaughterhouse supervisors are not incentivized to report incidents. [3]

A worker and cattle in a slaughterhouse Slaughterhouse.jpg
A worker and cattle in a slaughterhouse

Other risks of injury come from the close quarters in which workers cut the meat and the types of jobs they perform. [2] The spacing between workers, as well as the height of the disassembly lines and work surfaces, are the same - despite differences in worker body types. [2] For some workers, this forces them to make an extra effort to complete a given task and creates additional risk of injury. [2] Furthermore, despite the growing automation in slaughterhouses, many of the tasks involve heavy lifting, shoving, and turning animals, animal parts, or equipment. [2]

Although slaughterhouse workers are provided with protective gear, the inevitable condition of the work areas means workers are exposed to "blood, grease, animal feces, ingesta (food from the animal's digestive system), and other detritus from the animals they slaughter." [2]

2020 COVID-19 pandemic

See Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the meat industry in the United States.

Industry response

Pro-industry organizations, such as the American Meat Institute (AMI), have pointed out that the number of staff injuries in meat processing facilities have decreased in recent years. [7] According to a 2005 article in The New York Times , "the [meat production] industry also asserted that packing companies did not violate laws allowing workers to unionize and did not treat workers more harshly because of their immigration status." [11] The article quoted Patrick Boyle—president of the American Meat Institute—dismissing the 2005 Human Rights Watch report as "replete with falsehoods and baseless claims." [11]

Representatives of processing plants have also responded to accusations of workers' rights violations. [11] A spokesperson for Tyson Foods said, "we're disappointed by the [Human Rights Watch] report's misleading conclusions, but not surprised given the author's extensive ties to organized labor." [11] Smithfield's vice president, Dennis Treacy, similarly criticized the report, faulting it for reporting on violations from a decade ago rather than recent and relevant circumstances. [11]

When asked about the pace of poultry processing in their plants, Tyson Foods official told the Human Rights Watch that the speed of their lines conform to federal regulations. [2] According to the officials, "line speed varies depending on the type of product," and is regulated by the USDA. [2] While the historical standard speed was slower, it increased with automation which Tyson officials said results in "much less hand work." [2]

Implications for workers

The meat production industry employs thousands of low-wage workers who are at risk of being exposed to physical and psychological dangers. [5]

Physical

The significant demand for meat has imposed large quotas on slaughterhouse workers. [5] The work is physically demanding and difficult, based on repetitive motions. [1] [2] Meatpacking workers might need to make a cut every two to three seconds: this comes out to approximately ten thousand cuts over an eight-hour shift. [1] [3] [5] In addition to working with knives, meatpacking employees often have to repeatedly lift and move heavy objects during a shift and are exposed to dangerous machinery. [1] An employee at Excel (a division of Cargill Meat Solutions) reported lifting bags of meat weighing up to forty pounds every three seconds, [1] while other accounts from meatpacking workers indicate that some jobs including flipping an entire hog. [2] A hog slaughtering plant manager went on record during an unfair labor practice trial as saying, "there is a lot of heavy lifting and repetitive work." [2] Consequently, according to data published by the Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, approximately 25% of meatpacking workers are injured or become ill each year. [1] [5] Records of workplace injuries in Iowa showed a yearly average of 9.8 injuries per group of hundred full-time employees; there were an average of 51 injuries or illnesses per hundred meatpacking employees each year. [1] [5] According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the rate of injury and illness for the meatpacking industry is double the average of other American manufacturing jobs. [7]

While the types of injuries vary, lacerations are the most common. [3] Workers often accidentally stab either themselves or fellow employees who are nearby. [3] Other common health problems include workers developing tendonitis, cumulative trauma disorders, carpal tunnel, back and shoulder problems, and "trigger finger" - a condition in which a finger is frozen in a curled position. [3] [5] In addition, dull or worn knives place additional pressure on workers' tendons, joints, and nerves. [3]

Another "commonplace hazard and source of injury" is the wet floors of meat production plants. [2] A health care provider who services poultry industry workers in Northwest Arkansas told the Human Rights Watch, "I see leg and knee injuries too from people slipping on the wet surface, fighting to keep their balance." [2]

Psychological

Typical slaughterhouses are fast-paced. [5] The production is fast-paced and does not allow time to ensure the animals do not suffer. [5] According to a 2008 study in the Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy , the pain and terror animals go through in their final moments create "an employment situation ripe for psychological problems." [5] Another study by Rachel McNair (2002) suggests that slaughterhouse workers may be susceptible to perception-induced traumatic stress, and their situation merits close study. [5] Perpetration-induced traumatic stress (PITS) is a form of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in which psychological damage arises "from situations that would be traumatic if someone were a victim, but situations for which a person was a causal participant." [12] Essentially, by being involved in creating the traumatic situation, a victim of PITS would suffer PTSD symptoms, including anxiety, panic, depression, increased paranoia, or disassociation. [5] All these symptoms are tied to the psychological consequences of the act of killing. [5]

According to the 2008 study in the Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, there is ample anecdotal evidence of slaughterhouse workers exhibiting symptoms of PITS. First, the study asserts the substance abuse that is characteristics of PITS is prevalent among slaughterhouse workers. [5] Second, it cites reports workers recounted of nightmares relating to slaughterhouse work. "Virgil Butler, a long-time slaughterhouse worker, recalled having nightmares of chickens and reported a fellow worker being 'hauled off to the mental hospital' for severe recurring dreams." [5]

Policy protections

Human rights standards

USDA officer inspects pork production Swine inspection USDA.jpg
USDA officer inspects pork production

There are several international human rights protections for the workplace. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations' International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights both called for just and safe conditions of work. [2] In 1981, the International Labour Organization (ILO) wrote the Occupation Safety and Health Convention No. 155, which calls for national policies that minimize the hazards of the working environment. [2] Other aspects of the ILO's workplace safety conventions maintain standards of workers' compensation in the event of injury; the ILO calls for legal protections and regulations that offer fully paid medical care and rehabilitation for workers disabled or injured while on the job, as well as compensation for time taken off due to workplace injuries. [2]

According to a study by the Human Rights Watch, "the human rights standard for workplace safety and health centers on the principle that workers have a right to work in an environment reasonably free from predictable, preventable, serious risks." [2] While such standards do not require countries to eliminate all risks - whether major or minor - workers do have the right to know that when they go to work and complete their tasks, "they will be able to leave the workplace at the end of the day with life and limb intact." [2]

U.S. law

OSHA agency logo US-OSHA-Logo.svg
OSHA agency logo

American workplace protections laws generally conform to international labor standards. [2] The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 established the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), an agency of the United States Department of Labor that set and mandated national standards for workplace safety. [2] The Act gave OSHA several critical powers including the ability to inspect workplaces for noncompliance, impose penalties for safety violations, and remove a health or safety hazard. [2] When determining fines, the agency has wide discretion: OSHA considers many factors including the employer's previous compliance with safety standards, size, good faith, and the severity of the violation. [2] OSHA standards apply to all workers, included those who are undocumented or not citizens. [2]

There have been more recent legislative responses to the concerns of labor advocates. [7] In 2000, the former Nebraska Governor Michael Johanns (who later served as U.S. Secretary of Agriculture) issued the "Nebraska Meatpacking Industry Workers Bill of Rights," which recognized an employee's right to organize, work in safe conditions and access state and federal benefits. [7] In 2001, Congress overturned some OSHA ergonomics standards that had been approved by the Clinton administration. President Bush signed the repeal. [7]

See also


Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slaughterhouse</span> Facility where animals are slaughtered for meat

A slaughterhouse, also called an abattoir, is a facility where animals are slaughtered to provide food. Slaughterhouses supply meat, which then becomes the responsibility of a packaging facility.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is a large regulatory agency of the United States Department of Labor that originally had federal visitorial powers to inspect and examine workplaces. The United States Congress established the agency under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which President Richard M. Nixon signed into law on December 29, 1970. OSHA's mission is to "assure safe and healthy working conditions for working men and women by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance." The agency is also charged with enforcing a variety of whistleblower statutes and regulations. OSHA's workplace safety inspections have been shown to reduce injury rates and injury costs without adverse effects on employment, sales, credit ratings, or firm survival.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupational Safety and Health Act (United States)</span> United States labor law

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is a US labor law governing the federal law of occupational health and safety in the private sector and federal government in the United States. It was enacted by Congress in 1970 and was signed by President Richard Nixon on December 29, 1970. Its main goal is to ensure that employers provide employees with an environment free from recognized hazards, such as exposure to toxic chemicals, excessive noise levels, mechanical dangers, heat or cold stress, or unsanitary conditions. The Act created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyson Foods</span> American food company

Tyson Foods, Inc. is an American multinational corporation based in Springdale, Arkansas that operates in the food industry. The company is the world's second-largest processor and marketer of chicken, beef, and pork after JBS S.A. It annually exports the largest percentage of beef out of the United States. Together with its subsidiaries, it operates major food brands, including Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Ball Park, Wright Brand, Aidells, and State Fair. Tyson Foods ranked No. 79 in the 2020 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meat-packing industry</span> Industrial production of food and by-products from animals

The meat-packing industry handles the slaughtering, processing, packaging, and distribution of meat from animals such as cattle, pigs, sheep and other livestock. Poultry is generally not included. This greater part of the entire meat industry is primarily focused on producing meat for human consumption, but it also yields a variety of by-products including hides, dried blood, protein meals such as meat & bone meal, and, through the process of rendering, fats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meat industry</span> People and companies engaged in industrialized livestock agriculture

The meat industry are the people and companies engaged in modern industrialized livestock agriculture for the production, packing, preservation and marketing of meat. In economics, the meat industry is a fusion of primary (agriculture) and secondary (industry) activity and hard to characterize strictly in terms of either one alone. The greater part of the meat industry is the meat packing industry – the segment that handles the slaughtering, processing, packaging, and distribution of animals such as poultry, cattle, pigs, sheep and other livestock.

The Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) is a state government agency that regulates workplace safety and health in the U.S. state of Michigan. Michigan OSHA is an agency within the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and operates under a formal state-plan agreement with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Smithfield Foods, Inc., is an American pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia, United States with it own executive leadership team. It operates as an independent subsidiary of the multinational conglomerate WH Group. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In 973,000-square-foot meat-processing plant in Tar Heel, North Carolina, was said in 2000 to be the world's largest, harvesting 32,000 pigs a day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal slaughter</span> Killing of animals for human food

Animal slaughter is the killing of animals, usually referring to killing domestic livestock. It is estimated that each year 80 billion land animals are slaughtered for food. Most animals are slaughtered for food; however, they may also be slaughtered for other reasons such as for harvesting of pelts, being diseased and unsuitable for consumption, or being surplus for maintaining a breeding stock. Slaughter typically involves some initial cutting, opening the major body cavities to remove the entrails and offal but usually leaving the carcass in one piece. Such dressing can be done by hunters in the field or in a slaughterhouse. Later, the carcass is usually butchered into smaller cuts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive animal farming</span> Branch of agriculture

Intensive animal farming or industrial livestock production, also known by its opponents as factory farming and macro-farms, is a type of intensive agriculture, specifically an approach to animal husbandry designed to maximize production, while minimizing costs. To achieve this, agribusinesses keep livestock such as cattle, poultry, and fish at high stocking densities, at large scale, and using modern machinery, biotechnology, and global trade. The main products of this industry are meat, milk and eggs for human consumption. There are issues regarding whether intensive animal farming is sustainable in the social long-run given its costs in resources. Analysts also raise issues about its ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriprocessors</span> Defunct slaughterhouse and meat packaging corporation

Agriprocessors was the corporate identity of a slaughterhouse and meat-packaging factory based in Postville, Iowa, best known as a facility for the glatt kosher processing of cattle, as well as chicken, turkey, duck, and lamb. Agriprocessors' meat and poultry products were marketed under the brand Iowa Best Beef. Its kosher products were marketed under various labels, including Aaron’s Best, Shor Habor, Supreme Kosher, and Rubashkins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postville raid</span> Immigration raid in United States

The Postville raid was a raid at the Agriprocessors, Inc. kosher slaughterhouse and meat packing plant in Postville, Iowa, on May 12, 2008, executed by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division of the Department of Homeland Security together with other agencies.

An occupational fatality is a death that occurs while a person is at work or performing work related tasks. Occupational fatalities are also commonly called "occupational deaths" or "work-related deaths/fatalities" and can occur in any industry or occupation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poultry farming in the United States</span>

Poultry farming is a part of the United States's agricultural economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupational safety and health</span> Field concerned with the safety, health and welfare of people at work

Occupational safety and health (OSH) or occupational health and safety (OHS), also known simply as occupational health or occupational safety, is a multidisciplinary field concerned with the safety, health, and welfare of people at work. These terms also refer to the goals of this field, so their use in the sense of this article was originally an abbreviation of occupational safety and health program/department etc. OSH is related to the fields of occupational medicine and occupational hygiene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agricultural safety and health</span>

Agricultural safety and health is an aspect of occupational safety and health in the agricultural workplace. It specifically addresses the health and safety of farmers, farm workers, and their families.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal–industrial complex</span> Systematic, institutionalized exploitation of animals

The term animal–industrial complex (AIC) refers to the systematic and institutionalized exploitation of animals. It includes every economic activity involving animals, such as the food industry, animal testing, medicine, clothing, labor and transport, tourism and entertainment, selective breeding, and so forth. Proponents of the term claim that activities described by the term differ from individual acts of animal cruelty in that they constitute institutionalized animal exploitation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the meat industry in the United States</span> Impact of COVID-19

The meat industry has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Outbreaks of the virus have taken place in factories operated by the meat packing industry and the poultry processing industry. These outbreaks affected dozens of plants, leading to closures of some factories and disruption of others, and posed a significant threat to the meat supply in the United States. By April 27, 2020, there were at least 115 facilities with cases across 23 states, and at least 4,913 workers diagnosed positive with COVID-19, or approximately 3 percent of the workforce, with 20 deaths reported.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the meat industry in Canada</span> Impact of COVID-19

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, outbreaks of the virus took place in factories operated by the meat packing industry and the poultry processing industry. These outbreaks affected multiple plants, leading to closures of some factories and disruption of others, and posing a threat to the food supply in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Golden Triangle of Meat-packing</span> Industrial concentration in southwestern Kansas

The Golden Triangle of Meat-packing or Golden Triangle of Beef refers to the importance of meat-packing in three southwestern Kansas counties and their principal cities: Dodge City, Garden City, and Liberal. While population decreased in many counties in western Kansas during the 20th century, these three cities and their environs experienced population increases from 1980 to 2020. The increases were primarily due to employment opportunities at four large slaughter houses and meat-packing plants. The large majority of the employees at the meat packing plants are Hispanics, most foreign-born and many presumed to be undocumented. Unlike the rest of the state, Hispanics by 2020 made up a majority of the population of these three counties plus one adjacent county.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Worrall, Michael S. "Meatpacking Safety: Is OSHA Enforcement Adequate?" (PDF). Drake Journal of Agricultural Law. 9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 "Blood, Sweat and Fear: Workers' Rights in U.S. Meat and Poultry Plants" (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 2004. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Schlosser, Eric (2001). Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal . Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN   0395977894.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "Report: Number of Animals Killed In US Increases in 2010". Farm Animal Rights Movement. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dillard, Jennifer (Summer 2008). "Slaughterhouse Nightmares: Psychological Harm Suffered by Slaughterhouse Employees and the Possibility of Redress through Legal Reform". Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy. 15 (391).
  6. 1 2 Walker, Polly; Lawrence, Robert S. (2013). "American Meat: A Threat to Your Health and the Environment". Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics. 4 (1). Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Meatpacking in the U.S.: Still a 'Jungle' Out There?". NOW. PBS. 2006-12-15. Retrieved 2015-04-28.
  8. ↑ "51-3023 Slaughterers and Meat Packers". Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2013. Bureau of Labor Statistics . Retrieved 25 March 2015.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Nibert, David (2014). "Chapter 1: Animals, Immigrants, and Profits: Slaughterhouses and the Political Economy of Oppression". In Sorenson, John (ed.). Critical Animal Studies: Thinking the Unthinkable. Canadian Scholars' Press Inc. pp. 3–17.
  10. ↑ Hearings Before the Committee on Agriculture... on the So-called "Beveridge Amendment" to the Agricultural Appropriation Bill, U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Agriculture, 1906, pp. 346–50, 59th Congress, 1st Session.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Greenhouse, Steven (2005-01-25). "Meat Packing Industry Criticized on Human Rights Grounds". Business. New York Times. Retrieved 2005-04-25.
  12. ↑ MacNair, Rachel (2005). Perpetration-induced Traumatic Stress: The Psychological Consequences of Killing. Lincoln: Praeger/Greenwood Publishing Group.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.