Lanczos tensor

Last updated

The Lanczos tensor or Lanczos potential is a rank 3 tensor in general relativity that generates the Weyl tensor. [1] It was first introduced by Cornelius Lanczos in 1949. [2] The theoretical importance of the Lanczos tensor is that it serves as the gauge field for the gravitational field in the same way that, by analogy, the electromagnetic four-potential generates the electromagnetic field. [3] [4]

Contents

Definition

The Lanczos tensor can be defined in a few different ways. The most common modern definition is through the Weyl–Lanczos equations, which demonstrate the generation of the Weyl tensor from the Lanczos tensor. [4] These equations, presented below, were given by Takeno in 1964. [1] The way that Lanczos introduced the tensor originally was as a Lagrange multiplier [2] [5] on constraint terms studied in the variational approach to general relativity. [6] Under any definition, the Lanczos tensor H exhibits the following symmetries:

The Lanczos tensor always exists in four dimensions [7] but does not generalize to higher dimensions. [8] This highlights the specialness of four dimensions. [3] Note further that the full Riemann tensor cannot in general be derived from derivatives of the Lanczos potential alone. [7] [9] The Einstein field equations must provide the Ricci tensor to complete the components of the Ricci decomposition.

The Curtright field has a gauge-transformation dynamics similar to that of Lanczos tensor. But Curtright field exists in arbitrary dimensions > 4D. [10]

Weyl–Lanczos equations

The Weyl–Lanczos equations express the Weyl tensor entirely as derivatives of the Lanczos tensor: [11]

where is the Weyl tensor, the semicolon denotes the covariant derivative, and the subscripted parentheses indicate symmetrization. Although the above equations can be used to define the Lanczos tensor, they also show that it is not unique but rather has gauge freedom under an affine group. [12] If is an arbitrary vector field, then the Weyl–Lanczos equations are invariant under the gauge transformation

where the subscripted brackets indicate antisymmetrization. An often convenient choice is the Lanczos algebraic gauge, which sets The gauge can be further restricted through the Lanczos differential gauge . These gauge choices reduce the Weyl–Lanczos equations to the simpler form

Wave equation

The Lanczos potential tensor satisfies a wave equation [13]

where is the d'Alembert operator and

is known as the Cotton tensor. Since the Cotton tensor depends only on covariant derivatives of the Ricci tensor, it can perhaps be interpreted as a kind of matter current. [14] The additional self-coupling terms have no direct electromagnetic equivalent. These self-coupling terms, however, do not affect the vacuum solutions, where the Ricci tensor vanishes and the curvature is described entirely by the Weyl tensor. Thus in vacuum, the Einstein field equations are equivalent to the homogeneous wave equation in perfect analogy to the vacuum wave equation of the electromagnetic four-potential. This shows a formal similarity between gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves, with the Lanczos tensor well-suited for studying gravitational waves. [15]

In the weak field approximation where , a convenient form for the Lanczos tensor in the Lanczos gauge is [14]

Example

The most basic nontrivial case for expressing the Lanczos tensor is, of course, for the Schwarzschild metric. [4] The simplest, explicit component representation in natural units for the Lanczos tensor in this case is

with all other components vanishing up to symmetries. This form, however, is not in the Lanczos gauge. The nonvanishing terms of the Lanczos tensor in the Lanczos gauge are

It is further possible to show, even in this simple case, that the Lanczos tensor cannot in general be reduced to a linear combination of the spin coefficients of the Newman–Penrose formalism, which attests to the Lanczos tensor's fundamental nature. [11] Similar calculations have been used to construct arbitrary Petrov type D solutions. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaluza–Klein theory</span> Unified field theory

In physics, Kaluza–Klein theory is a classical unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism built around the idea of a fifth dimension beyond the common 4D of space and time and considered an important precursor to string theory. In their setup, the vacuum has the usual 3 dimensions of space and one dimension of time but with another microscopic extra spatial dimension in the shape of a tiny circle. Gunnar Nordström had an earlier, similar idea. But in that case, a fifth component was added to the electromagnetic vector potential, representing the Newtonian gravitational potential, and writing the Maxwell equations in five dimensions.

In theoretical physics, the Einstein–Cartan theory, also known as the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory, is a classical theory of gravitation similar to general relativity. The theory was first proposed by Élie Cartan in 1922. Einstein–Cartan theory is the simplest Poincaré gauge theory.

Teleparallelism, was an attempt by Albert Einstein to base a unified theory of electromagnetism and gravity on the mathematical structure of distant parallelism, also referred to as absolute or teleparallelism. In this theory, a spacetime is characterized by a curvature-free linear connection in conjunction with a metric tensor field, both defined in terms of a dynamical tetrad field.

In physics, the Brans–Dicke theory of gravitation is a competitor to Einstein's general theory of relativity. It is an example of a scalar–tensor theory, a gravitational theory in which the gravitational interaction is mediated by a scalar field as well as the tensor field of general relativity. The gravitational constant is not presumed to be constant but instead is replaced by a scalar field which can vary from place to place and with time.

In differential geometry, the Weyl curvature tensor, named after Hermann Weyl, is a measure of the curvature of spacetime or, more generally, a pseudo-Riemannian manifold. Like the Riemann curvature tensor, the Weyl tensor expresses the tidal force that a body feels when moving along a geodesic. The Weyl tensor differs from the Riemann curvature tensor in that it does not convey information on how the volume of the body changes, but rather only how the shape of the body is distorted by the tidal force. The Ricci curvature, or trace component of the Riemann tensor contains precisely the information about how volumes change in the presence of tidal forces, so the Weyl tensor is the traceless component of the Riemann tensor. This tensor has the same symmetries as the Riemann tensor, but satisfies the extra condition that it is trace-free: metric contraction on any pair of indices yields zero. It is obtained from the Riemann tensor by subtracting a tensor that is a linear expression in the Ricci tensor.

A classical field theory is a physical theory that predicts how one or more fields in physics interact with matter through field equations, without considering effects of quantization; theories that incorporate quantum mechanics are called quantum field theories. In most contexts, 'classical field theory' is specifically intended to describe electromagnetism and gravitation, two of the fundamental forces of nature.

In general relativity, a vacuum solution is a Lorentzian manifold whose Einstein tensor vanishes identically. According to the Einstein field equation, this means that the stress–energy tensor also vanishes identically, so that no matter or non-gravitational fields are present. These are distinct from the electrovacuum solutions, which take into account the electromagnetic field in addition to the gravitational field. Vacuum solutions are also distinct from the lambdavacuum solutions, where the only term in the stress–energy tensor is the cosmological constant term.

In general relativity, the pp-wave spacetimes, or pp-waves for short, are an important family of exact solutions of Einstein's field equation. The term pp stands for plane-fronted waves with parallel propagation, and was introduced in 1962 by Jürgen Ehlers and Wolfgang Kundt.

In theoretical physics, Nordström's theory of gravitation was a predecessor of general relativity. Strictly speaking, there were actually two distinct theories proposed by the Finnish theoretical physicist Gunnar Nordström, in 1912 and 1913 respectively. The first was quickly dismissed, but the second became the first known example of a metric theory of gravitation, in which the effects of gravitation are treated entirely in terms of the geometry of a curved spacetime.

In the theory of Lorentzian manifolds, particularly in the context of applications to general relativity, the Kretschmann scalar is a quadratic scalar invariant. It was introduced by Erich Kretschmann.

Scalar theories of gravitation are field theories of gravitation in which the gravitational field is described using a scalar field, which is required to satisfy some field equation.

Conformal gravity refers to gravity theories that are invariant under conformal transformations in the Riemannian geometry sense; more accurately, they are invariant under Weyl transformations where is the metric tensor and is a function on spacetime.

In theoretical physics, a scalar–tensor theory is a field theory that includes both a scalar field and a tensor field to represent a certain interaction. For example, the Brans–Dicke theory of gravitation uses both a scalar field and a tensor field to mediate the gravitational interaction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-Newtonian expansion</span> Method of approximation in general relativity

In general relativity, post-Newtonian expansions are used for finding an approximate solution of Einstein field equations for the metric tensor. The approximations are expanded in small parameters that express orders of deviations from Newton's law of universal gravitation. This allows approximations to Einstein's equations to be made in the case of weak fields. Higher-order terms can be added to increase accuracy, but for strong fields sometimes it is preferable to solve the complete equations numerically. This method is a common mark of effective field theories. In the limit, when the small parameters are equal to 0, the post-Newtonian expansion reduces to Newton's law of gravity.

Alternatives to general relativity are physical theories that attempt to describe the phenomenon of gravitation in competition with Einstein's theory of general relativity. There have been many different attempts at constructing an ideal theory of gravity.

The Lagrangian in scalar-tensor theory can be expressed in the Jordan frame in which the scalar field or some function of it multiplies the Ricci scalar, or in the Einstein frame in which Ricci scalar is not multiplied by the scalar field. There exist various transformations between these frames. Despite the fact that these frames have been around for some time there has been debate about whether either, both, or neither frame is a 'physical' frame which can be compared to observations and experiment.

Newton–Cartan theory is a geometrical re-formulation, as well as a generalization, of Newtonian gravity first introduced by Élie Cartan and Kurt Friedrichs and later developed by Dautcourt, Dixon, Dombrowski and Horneffer, Ehlers, Havas, Künzle, Lottermoser, Trautman, and others. In this re-formulation, the structural similarities between Newton's theory and Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity are readily seen, and it has been used by Cartan and Friedrichs to give a rigorous formulation of the way in which Newtonian gravity can be seen as a specific limit of general relativity, and by Jürgen Ehlers to extend this correspondence to specific solutions of general relativity.

f(R) is a type of modified gravity theory which generalizes Einstein's general relativity. f(R) gravity is actually a family of theories, each one defined by a different function, f, of the Ricci scalar, R. The simplest case is just the function being equal to the scalar; this is general relativity. As a consequence of introducing an arbitrary function, there may be freedom to explain the accelerated expansion and structure formation of the Universe without adding unknown forms of dark energy or dark matter. Some functional forms may be inspired by corrections arising from a quantum theory of gravity. f(R) gravity was first proposed in 1970 by Hans Adolph Buchdahl. It has become an active field of research following work by Starobinsky on cosmic inflation. A wide range of phenomena can be produced from this theory by adopting different functions; however, many functional forms can now be ruled out on observational grounds, or because of pathological theoretical problems.

In theoretical physics, the Curtright field (named after Thomas Curtright) is a tensor quantum field of mixed symmetry, whose gauge-invariant dynamics are dual to those of the general relativistic graviton in higher (D>4) spacetime dimensions. Or at least this holds for the linearized theory. For the full nonlinear theory, less is known. Several difficulties arise when interactions of mixed symmetry fields are considered, but at least in situations involving an infinite number of such fields (notably string theory) these difficulties are not insurmountable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dual graviton</span> Hypothetical particle found in supergravity

In theoretical physics, the dual graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that is a dual of the graviton under electric-magnetic duality, as an S-duality, predicted by some formulations of supergravity in eleven dimensions.

References

  1. 1 2 Hyôitirô Takeno, "On the spintensor of Lanczos", Tensor, 15 (1964) pp. 103–119.
  2. 1 2 Lanczos, Cornelius (1949-07-01). "Lagrangian Multiplier and Riemannian Spaces". Reviews of Modern Physics. American Physical Society (APS). 21 (3): 497–502. Bibcode:1949RvMP...21..497L. doi: 10.1103/revmodphys.21.497 . ISSN   0034-6861.
  3. 1 2 P. O’Donnell and H. Pye, "A Brief Historical Review of the Important Developments in Lanczos Potential Theory", EJTP, 7 (2010) pp. 327–350. www.ejtp.com/articles/ejtpv7i24p327.pdf
  4. 1 2 3 Novello, M.; Velloso, A. L. (1987). "The connection between general observers and Lanczos potential". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 19 (12): 1251–1265. Bibcode:1987GReGr..19.1251N. doi:10.1007/bf00759104. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   122998917.
  5. ↑ Lanczos, C. (1962-07-01). "The Splitting of the Riemann Tensor". Reviews of Modern Physics. American Physical Society (APS). 34 (3): 379–389. Bibcode:1962RvMP...34..379L. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.34.379. ISSN   0034-6861.
  6. ↑ Cornelius Lanczos, "A Remarkable Property of the Riemann–Christoffel Tensor in Four Dimensions", Annals of Mathematics, 39 (1938) pp. 842–850. www.jstor.org/stable/1968467
  7. 1 2 Bampi, Franco; Caviglia, Giacomo (1983). "Third-order tensor potentials for the Riemann and Weyl tensors". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 15 (4): 375–386. Bibcode:1983GReGr..15..375B. doi:10.1007/bf00759166. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   122782358.
  8. ↑ Edgar, S. Brian (1994). "Nonexistence of the Lanczos potential for the Riemann tensor in higher dimensions". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 26 (3): 329–332. Bibcode:1994GReGr..26..329E. doi:10.1007/bf02108015. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   120343522.
  9. ↑ Massa, Enrico; Pagani, Enrico (1984). "Is the Riemann tensor derivable from a tensor potential?". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 16 (9): 805–816. Bibcode:1984GReGr..16..805M. doi:10.1007/bf00762934. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   120457526.
  10. ↑ Curtright, Thomas (December 1985). "Generalized gauge fields". Physics Letters B. 165 (4–6): 304–308. Bibcode:1985PhLB..165..304C. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91235-3.
  11. 1 2 O'Donnell, Peter (2004). "Letter: A Solution of the Weyl–Lanczos Equations for the Schwarzschild Space-Time". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 36 (6): 1415–1422. Bibcode:2004GReGr..36.1415O. doi:10.1023/b:gerg.0000022577.11259.e0. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   122801979.
  12. ↑ Hammon, K. S.; Norris, L. K. (1993). "The affine geometry of the Lanczos H-tensor formalism". General Relativity and Gravitation. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 25 (1): 55–80. Bibcode:1993GReGr..25...55H. doi:10.1007/bf00756929. ISSN   0001-7701. S2CID   26822756.
  13. ↑ Dolan, P.; Kim, C. W. (1994-12-08). "The wave equation for the Lanczos potential". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 447 (1931): 557–575. Bibcode:1994RSPSA.447..557D. doi:10.1098/rspa.1994.0155. ISSN   0962-8444. S2CID   123625479.
  14. 1 2 Roberts, M. D. (1996). "The physical interpretation of the Lanczos tensor". Il Nuovo Cimento B. Series 11. 110 (10): 1165–1176. arXiv: gr-qc/9904006 . doi:10.1007/bf02724607. ISSN   1826-9877. S2CID   17670505.
  15. ↑ López-Bonilla, J. L.; Ovando, G.; Peña, J. J. (1999). "A Lanczos Potential for Plane Gravitational Waves". Foundations of Physics Letters. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 12 (4): 401–405. doi:10.1023/a:1021656622094. ISSN   0894-9875. S2CID   118057344.
  16. ↑ Ahsan, Zafar; Bilal, Mohd (2010-08-26). "A Solution of Weyl-Lanczos Equations for Arbitrary Petrov Type D Vacuum Spacetimes". International Journal of Theoretical Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 49 (11): 2713–2722. Bibcode:2010IJTP...49.2713A. doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0464-5. ISSN   0020-7748. S2CID   123625845.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.