List of formerly open-source or free software

Last updated

This is a list of notable software packages which were published as free and open-source software, or into the public domain, but were made proprietary software, or otherwise switched to a license (including source-available licenses) that is not considered to be free and open source.

List of formerly open-source software
TitleOrig. free dateLicense change dateInitial free licenseNon-free license Forked replacementNotes
Akka 20092022 Apache-2.0 Business Source License [1] [2]
ArangoDB 20112023 Apache-2.0 Business Source License [3]
Aseprite 20012016 GPL-2.0 EULA that permits personal use but forbids redistribution [4] LibreSprite
CockroachDB 20152019 Apache-2.0 Business Source License [5]
Consul 20142023 [6] MPL-2.0 Business Source License [6]
Couchbase Server 20102021 Apache-2.0 Business Source License [7]
Couchbase Mobile 2022 [8] Apache-2.0 Business Source License [8]
Elasticsearch 20102021 Apache-2.0 "Elastic License" and Server Side Public License [9] [10] [11] OpenSearch Added AGPL v3.0 on 29 August 2024 [12]
Emby 20142018 GPL-2.0 Source code closed on December 8, 2018. [13] Jellyfin
FBReader 20132015 GPL-2.0-or-later Apparently the number of devs was limited, and they all agreed to relicense it.[ citation needed ]
LiveCode 20132021 [14] GPL-3.0-only proprietary [14] The Livecode company developed it, ran a Kickstarter campaign to GPL it, ran it for eight years open source, and then relicensed it back to proprietary, saying there were few other contributors, most were using the free GPL version, and they couldn't sustain the project. [14]
LiveJournal 19992014 GPL-2.0-or-later The source code was made private in 2014. Dreamwidth
MetaMask 20162020 MIT Custom proprietary "non-commercial use only" license. [15]
MongoDB 20092018 AGPL-3.0-only Server Side Public License [16] [17]
Nexuiz 20052012 GPL-2.0-or-later Game abandoned in favour of a commercial video game of the same name, which licensed the Nexuiz title but is not based on its engine. Xonotic [18]
OctoberCMS 20142021 MIT Cited the sustainability of its open source model as a factor. [19] Winter [20] [21]
OTRS 20012020 GPL-3.0-or-later Support for the Community Edition dropped on December 23, 2020, [22] Znuny
Paint.NET 20042007 MIT freeware license that prohibits modification or resale [23]
PyMOL 20002010 MIT-CMU [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]
Reddit 20082017 CPAL-1.0 Source code was made private in 2017, as the internal codebase had already diverged significantly from the public one.
Redis 20092024 BSD-3-Clause dual: custom license and Server Side Public License [29] Valkey [30]
Sourcegraph 20132023 Apache-2.0 proprietary [31]
Terraform 20142023 [6] MPL-2.0 Business Source License [6] OpenTofu [32] HashiCorp founder considered the move "tragic for open source innovation." [33]
Tux Racer 20002002 GPL-2.0-or-later Commercial expansion by original authors, also called Tux Racer. Extreme Tux Racer (formerly PlanetPenguin Racer)
Vagrant 20102023 [6] MIT Business Source License [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apache HTTP Server</span> Open-source web server software

The Apache HTTP Server is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software, released under the terms of Apache License 2.0. It is developed and maintained by a community of developers under the auspices of the Apache Software Foundation.

The free software movement is a social movement with the goal of obtaining and guaranteeing certain freedoms for software users, namely the freedoms to run, study, modify, and share copies of software. Software which meets these requirements, The Four Essential Freedoms of Free Software, is termed free software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free and open-source software</span> Software whose source code is available and which is permissively licensed

Free and open-source software (FOSS) is software that is available under a license that grants the right to use, modify, and distribute the software, modified or not, to everyone free of charge. The public availability of the source code is, therefore, a necessary but not sufficient condition. FOSS is an inclusive umbrella term for free software and open-source software. FOSS is in contrast to proprietary software, where the software is under restrictive copyright or licensing and the source code is hidden from the users.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PyMOL</span> Biology structure visualization software

PyMOL is a source-available molecular visualization system created by Warren Lyford DeLano. It was commercialized initially by DeLano Scientific LLC, which was a private software company dedicated to creating useful tools that become universally accessible to scientific and educational communities. It is currently commercialized by Schrödinger, Inc. As the original software license was a permissive licence, they were able to remove it; new versions are no longer released under the Python license, but under a custom license, and some of the source code is no longer released. PyMOL can produce high-quality 3D images of small molecules and biological macromolecules, such as proteins. PyMOL is widely used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linux Foundation</span> Non-profit technology consortium to develop the Linux operating system

The Linux Foundation (LF) is a non-profit organization established in 2000 to support Linux development and open-source software projects.

A Contributor License Agreement (CLA) defines the terms under which intellectual property has been contributed to a company/project, typically software under an open source license.

Benevolent dictator for life (BDFL) is a title given to a small number of open-source software development leaders, typically project founders who retain the final say in disputes or arguments within the community. The phrase originated in 1995 with reference to Guido van Rossum, creator of the Python programming language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RPM Package Manager</span> Package management system

RPM Package Manager (RPM) is a free and open-source package management system. The name RPM refers to the .rpm file format and the package manager program itself. RPM was intended primarily for Linux distributions; the file format is the baseline package format of the Linux Standard Base.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simon Phipps (programmer)</span> Computer scientist and web and open source advocate

Simon Phipps is a computer scientist and web and open source advocate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Couchbase Server</span> Open-source NoSQL database

Couchbase Server, originally known as Membase, is a source-available, distributed multi-model NoSQL document-oriented database software package optimized for interactive applications. These applications may serve many concurrent users by creating, storing, retrieving, aggregating, manipulating and presenting data. In support of these kinds of application needs, Couchbase Server is designed to provide easy-to-scale key-value, or JSON document access, with low latency and high sustainability throughput. It is designed to be clustered from a single machine to very large-scale deployments spanning many machines.

Elasticsearch is a search engine based on Apache Lucene. It provides a distributed, multitenant-capable full-text search engine with an HTTP web interface and schema-free JSON documents. Official clients are available in Java, .NET (C#), PHP, Python, Ruby and many other languages. According to the DB-Engines ranking, Elasticsearch is the most popular enterprise search engine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BlueSpice</span> Wiki software

BlueSpice is free wiki software based on the MediaWiki engine and licensed with the GNU General Public License. It is especially developed for businesses as an enterprise wiki distribution for MediaWiki and used in over 150 countries.

PyTorch is a machine learning library based on the Torch library, used for applications such as computer vision and natural language processing, originally developed by Meta AI and now part of the Linux Foundation umbrella. It is one of the most popular deep learning frameworks, alongside others such as TensorFlow and PaddlePaddle, offering free and open-source software released under the modified BSD license. Although the Python interface is more polished and the primary focus of development, PyTorch also has a C++ interface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grafana</span> Platform for data analytics and monitoring

Grafana is a multi-platform open source analytics and interactive visualization web application. It can produce charts, graphs, and alerts for the web when connected to supported data sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elastic NV</span> Company behind search engine Elasticsearch

Elastic NV is an American-Dutch software company that provides self-managed and software as a service (SaaS) offerings for search, logging, security, observability, and analytics use cases. It was founded in 2012 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and was previously known as Elasticsearch.

The Server Side Public License (SSPL) is a source-available copyleft software license introduced by MongoDB Inc. in 2018.

OpenSearch is a family of software consisting of a search engine, and OpenSearch Dashboards, a data visualization dashboard for that search engine. It is an open-source project developed by the OpenSearch Software Foundation written primarily in Java.

The Business Source License is a software license which publishes source code but limits the right to use the software to certain classes of users. The BUSL is not an open-source license, but it is source-available license that also mandates an eventual transition to an open-source license. This characteristic has been described as a compromise between traditional proprietary licenses and open source.

References

  1. Bonér, Jonas (2022-09-07). "Why We Are Changing the License for Akka". Lightbend. Archived from the original on 2022-10-03. Retrieved 2022-10-31.
  2. Kunert, Paul (2022-09-08). "Open source biz sick of FOSS community exploitation overhauls software rights". The Register . Situation Publishing. Archived from the original on 2022-09-29. Retrieved 2022-10-31.
  3. Carabine, Matt (2023-10-11). "Evolving ArangoDB's Licensing Model for a Sustainable Future". ArangoDB. Archived from the original on 2023-10-17. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  4. Capello, David. "Aseprite - New source code license". www.aseprite.org. Archived from the original on 2017-06-23. Retrieved 2021-11-20.
  5. Mattis, Peter; Darnell, Ben; Kimball, Spencer (2019-06-04). "Why we're relicensing CockroachDB". Cockroach Labs. Archived from the original on 2022-11-07. Retrieved 2023-01-10.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dadgar, Armon (2023-08-10). "HashiCorp adopts Business Source License". HashiCorp. Archived from the original on 2023-08-11. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
  7. Anderson, Scott (2021-03-26). "Business Source License (BSL 1.1) Adopted by Couchbase". The Couchbase Blog. Couchbase, Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-08-22. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  8. 1 2 Anderson, Scott (2022-02-25). "Couchbase Mobile changes source code license to BSL 1.1". The Couchbase Blog. Couchbase, Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-06-07. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  9. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. "Elastic changes open-source license to monetize cloud-service use". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-01-23.
  10. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven (2021-04-13). "OpenSearch: AWS rolls out its open source Elasticsearch fork". TechRepublic. Retrieved 2021-09-03.
  11. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. "AWS, as predicted, is forking Elasticsearch". ZDNet. Retrieved 2021-01-28.
  12. "Elasticsearch is Open Source, Again". Elastic Blog. Retrieved 2024-09-01.
  13. "[Request] GPL Violation". Emby Community Blog. 2018-03-21. Archived from the original on 2018-12-25. Retrieved 2017-08-19.
  14. 1 2 3 Anderson, Tim (2021-09-06). "Why we abandoned open source: LiveCode CEO on retreat despite successful kickstarter". The Independent . Archived from the original on 2021-09-15. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
  15. Dan Finlay (2020-08-20). "Evolving our License for the Next Wave of MetaMask Users". Consensys . Retrieved 2024-08-04.
  16. Vaughan-Nichols, Steven J. (2019-01-16). "MongoDB "open-source" Server Side Public License rejected". ZDNet. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  17. "MongoDB's licensing changes led Red Hat to drop the database from the latest version of its server OS". GeekWire. 2019-01-16. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  18. Larabel, Michael (2010-03-22). "Nexuiz Gets Forked, Turned Into Xonotic". Phoronix . Retrieved 2016-10-30.
  19. "October CMS Moves to Become a Paid Platform". October . 2021-04-12. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-09-19.
  20. Laurent, Pierre-Edouard (2021-10-16). "Meilleur CMS (2022) : le comparatif des gestionnaires de contenus pour créer un site web". Clubic.com (in French). Retrieved 2022-06-22.
  21. "We have forked October CMS". wintercms.com. Retrieved 2022-06-22.
  22. "Attention! Security risk with OTRS 6!". OTRS. 2020-12-23. Retrieved 2023-02-02.
  23. "A new license for Paint.NET v3.5". 2009-11-07. Retrieved 2015-02-11.
  24. now a custom license granting broad use, redistribution, and modification rights, but assigning copyright to any version to Schrodinger, LLC.
  25. "PyMOL | pymol.org". pymol.org. Retrieved 2021-11-07. Open-Source Philosophy
    PyMOL is a commercial product, but we make most of its source code freely available under a permissive license. The open source project is maintained by Schrödinger and ultimately funded by everyone who purchases a PyMOL license.
    Open source enables open science.
    This was the vision of the original PyMOL author Warren L. DeLano.
  26. "schrodinger/pymol-open-source". GitHub. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
  27. "PyMOL Molecular Graphics System". SourceForge.
  28. "Open-Source PyMOL". Schrodinger, Inc. 2021-11-05. Retrieved 2021-11-07.
  29. Trollope, Rowan (2024-03-20). "Redis Adopts Dual Source-Available Licensing". Redis. Archived from the original on 2024-03-20. Retrieved 2024-03-20.
  30. "Linux Foundation Launches Open Source Valkey Community". Linux Foundation. 2024-03-28. Archived from the original on 2024-03-28. Retrieved 2024-03-28.
  31. darkcrizt (2023-07-06). "Sourcegraph abandons open source in favor of a proprietary license". LinuxAddict (Linux Adictos). Archived from the original on 2023-08-24. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
  32. Miller, Ron (2023-09-20). "Terraform fork gets renamed OpenTofu, and joins Linux Foundation". TechCrunch . Yahoo! Inc. Archived from the original on 2023-11-02. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
  33. Fay, Joe (2023-10-16). "HashiCorp CEO predicts OSS-free Silicon Valley unless the open source model evolves". The Stack. Archived from the original on 2023-10-29. Retrieved 2023-11-02.