Louise Belcourt

Last updated
Louise Belcourt
Born1961
Montreal, Canada
NationalityCanadian, American
Education Mount Allison University
Known forPainter
AwardsJohn S. Guggenheim Fellowship, Pollock-Krasner Foundation, New York Foundation for the Arts
Website Louise Belcourt
Louise Belcourt, Mound #12, oil on panel, 22" x 29", 2012. Louise Belcourt Mound 12 2012.jpg
Louise Belcourt, Mound #12, oil on panel, 22” x 29”, 2012.

Louise Belcourt (born 1961) is a Canadian-American artist based in New York, known for elusive, largely abstract paintings that blend modernist formal play, a commitment to the physical world, and a visual language that shifts between landscape and the body, architecture and geometric form. [1] [2] [3] [4] New York Times critic Ken Johnson writes of her earlier work, "balancing adroitly between Color Field abstraction and Pop-style representation, Ms. Belcourt's paintings invite meditation on the perceptual, the conceptual and how our minds construct the world." [5] Describing her later evolution, David Brody writes in Artcritical, "Hard-nosed Canadian empiricism and Brooklyn grit seem to combine in Belcourt’s work to undermine stylistic stasis." [6]

Contents

Belcourt has exhibited internationally, including shows at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, Vienna Kunstlerhaus, The Drawing Center, Stewart Hall (Quebec), and the Weatherspoon Art Museum. [7] [8] [9] [10] She has received awards from the John S. Guggenheim Foundation, Pollock-Krasner Foundation and New York Foundation for the Arts, among others, [11] [12] and her art belongs to the art collections of the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, the Cultural Ministry of Quebec, and Fleming Museum of Art. [13] [14] [15]

Belcourt splits her time between Brooklyn, New York and eastern Quebec, Canada. [2] [16]

Early life and career

Belcourt was born and raised in Montreal, Canada in 1961 and spent summers in the Quebec town of Métis-sur-Mer, on the south bank of the St. Lawrence River. [14] She developed an interest in art as a child from working alongside her grandfather, an amateur painter, and from art lessons taken from age eight through high school. [13] [16] When she was twenty-one years old, Belcourt's mother died after a long illness; she expressed the loss in an early series of portraits of her mother hovering or disappearing in an abstract landscape, which she based on a photograph taken in her mother's youth. [16] Belcourt studied at Mount Allison University in rural New Brunswick (BFA, 1983), then moved to New York City in 1984, drawn by its greater sense of freedom and opportunity for pursuing a career as a painter. [13] [16] [14] She built her reputation in the 1990s through group exhibitions at The Drawing Center, Brooklyn Museum of Art, and Weatherspoon Art Museum and her first solo shows at the Annika Sundvik (1996) and Peter Blum (1997) galleries in New York. [9] [17] [18] [19]

Since 2000, Belcourt has worked for roughly four months of each year beginning in late May in Métis-sur-Mer, filling notebooks with plein-air gouache drawings of what she calls the landscape's clean, clear "heightened reality" and working on canvasses continued upon her return to Brooklyn. [14] [2] [20] In the 2000s, Belcourt has had solo exhibitions at Jeff Bailey Gallery (New York), [5] Galerie Vidal-Saint Phalle and Galerie 5 ème Étage (Paris), [21] [22] [23] Patricia Sweetow Gallery (San Francisco), [24] and Locks Gallery (Philadelphia), [25] among others.

Work

Louise Belcourt, My Beautiful Family, oil on canvas, 72" x 80", 1995. Louise Belcourt My Beautiful Family 1995.jpg
Louise Belcourt, My Beautiful Family, oil on canvas, 72" x 80", 1995.

Belcourt's paintings have been described as "battles between landscape and abstraction" [16] that explore liminal spaces of perception; she terms them "paintings of sculptures of landscapes." [5] [26] [25] Her idiosyncratic visual language remains distinct from either a purely representational or abstract syntax, combining natural, architectural and geometric forms—often stacked, floating, occluded or cascading—that can evoke landscapes, prehistoric mounds, the built world or the body; as a result, her work is difficult to categorize. [1] [27] [28] [29] ARTnews's Amanda Church writes, "Belcourt has carved a unique niche for herself in the canon of contemporary painting: the best kind, where antecedents are traceable but there's nothing that's quite the same." [3]

Critics have likened Belcourt's biomorphic and slab-like forms to those of Philip Guston and Giorgio Morandi; [30] [2] [22] her exploration of pictorial ambiguity to early Modernists Georgia O'Keeffe, Marsden Hartley and Arthur Dove, as well as Malevich and Mondrian; [6] her commitment to the physical and bodily experience to Canadian visionary landscape artists the Group of Seven, Emily Carr and Anne Savage, [16] [1] and the work's sense of mystery to that of Giorgio de Chirico and Ellsworth Kelly. [31] [2]

Early painting

Belcourt's early painting has been characterized as abstract and intensely physical, with a combination of sensuality, aggression and rough, raw feeling that ran counter to the cool, conceptual art dominant in the 1990s. [17] [29] [32] [16] Critics compare the work's dense surfaces to those of Elizabeth Murray and its gestural violence to the paintings of Joan Mitchell and Cy Twombly. [17] [33] [16] Characteristic works by Belcourt in this period feature elemental, mysterious dark- or blood-red biomorphic blobs, which hover on layered, creamy surfaces suggesting flesh or earth that she distressed with scuffs, scars, punctures and stains. [17] [19] [33] [26] In her review of Belcourt's first solo show, New York Times critic Roberta Smith notes subtle indications of an interest in the body and landscape, pronouncing the effect of works such as My Beautiful Family (1995) as "peculiarly vulnerable" like "a painting with scraped knees." [17]

In his review of Belcourt's next show (Peter Blum, 1997), ARTnews critic Gregory Volk describes her paintings (e.g., General Upsets, 1996; They'll Never Forgive You for Being Pretty, 1996-7) as "palpably human" abstractions that were at once "searing and gorgeous," intensely personal and restrained, ethereal and brutal. [33] [19] [30] Dominique Nahas notes the work's careful mix of deliberateness and happenstance, understated optical effects and shifting figure-ground relationships, which creates a "life force" fluctuating between tenderness and vehemence, theatricality and non-narrative form. [29]

Louise Belcourt, Hedge Painting #2, oil on canvas, 57" x 76", 2003 Louise Belcourt Hedge Painting 2 2003.jpg
Louise Belcourt, Hedge Painting #2, oil on canvas, 57” x 76”, 2003

Painting 2000–2008

In the early 2000s, Belcourt began to make more concrete references to landscapes inspired by stark Canadian coastal vistas and wilderness; these references result in a representational/abstract ambiguity enabling the juxtaposition of more concepts (e.g., painterliness and Pop artificiality) and feelings (humor, surreality, erotic anxiety) in her paintings. [34] [13] [5] [35] Works such as Sky Painting (2000) feature subtly modulated, horizontal bands suggesting stretches of land, sky and sea, their spacious calm disrupted with the intrusion of incongruous red tongue- or finger-like shapes. [36] [37] [13] [34] In Island (2000) and Woo (2001), small tufts of grass transform abstract color-field paintings into seascapes—in these cases unsettled by what The New Yorker describes as "a Gustonish serpent slithering into Eden" in the former, and a red eel- or finger-like shape popping through the surface in the latter. [37]

In the simplified, sharply contoured compositions of her "Hedge" paintings and "Cedar" drawings (2001–8), [38] Belcourt's blob shapes give way to sculptural, monolithic slabs enhanced by cast light, which are set off by simplified pine tree and bare branch forms. [5] [39] [20] The blocky shapes—inspired by the hedges of Métis-sur-Mer and painted in a palette of greens, aqua-blues, and creams—have been likened to pared-down loaves and pods, monumental sofa cushions and "modernist modules." [40] [41] [39] [42] [5] The ambiguity of the minimal forms took Belcourt's work in an intentionally unresolved, occasionally comical direction that Art in America labels "abstraction shading into figuration" [4] and Time Out terms "visual version(s) of Zen koans"; [39] these reviews draw parallels in the work to artists as diverse as Guston, De Chirico and Richard Serra. [5] [16] [20]

Later painting

Louise Belcourt, Cliff Flower #8, oil on canvas, 56" x 72", 2017. Louise Belcourt Cliff Flower 8 2017.jpg
Louise Belcourt, Cliff Flower #8, oil on canvas, 56” x 72”, 2017.

Critics note a greater degree of spatial effects and figure-ground contradictions in Belcourt's later work, achieved through subtle shifts in tone, color and light and more expansive forms and compositions that conflate landscape, cityscape and geometry, and organic and artificial. [1] [27] [31] [2] These paintings are regarded as reflecting Belcourt's dual Brooklyn/Quebec experience and—according to John Yau—are less about landscape or abstraction than about "the visual signs we assume to be integral to each." [1] [27] He writes, "It is this doubleness that Belcourt brings to fruition in her work; and it is unlike anyone else’s … revealing more possibilities the more time you spend with them." [1] Writers also note her later work's resistance to fashionable and academic discourses (e.g., appropriation, ironic signaling, or digital media) and ongoing commitment to modernist formal play, physicality, emotion and the craft of painting. [2] [1] [26]

In the "HedgeLand Paintings" (2009–10), [43] Belcourt shifts in a geometric direction, replacing formerly sweeping vistas with dense, fractured configurations of stacked brick- or box-like, modular forms that press against the picture plane and defy spatial logic. [6] [2] [31] The imagery of these paintings ranges from clearly referenced landforms—sometimes wrapped around architectonic, gate-like shapes or monoliths—to almost purely abstract, fluid configurations of soft-edged, rectangular shapes that resemble the compressed stacking of form in a cityscape. [6] [3] [14] Belcourt's portrayal of light through the interplay of lighter façades and shadowed edges is a key component of her later work, creating a convincing sense of three-dimensionality and space beyond the canvas in essentially flat, two-dimensional paintings. [44]

The "Mound" paintings, [45] begun in 2011, offer compositions that are less dense and feature sculptural shapes resembling buildings, appliances, boxes, or mountains. [3] [46] [14] [26] Amanda Church describes them as "mini-worlds open to myriad interpretations." [3] [26] [25] In her "Cliff Flower" and "Lamb's Ears" works (2015–7) [47] Belcourt incorporates a more varied palette—including black and greyed color shades—as well as curved, plant- and blimp-like forms that break up the space and are influenced (in shape and color) by her interest in gardening. [44] [27] [25] Critics suggest these more organic and anthropomorphic forms (reflected in titles connoting both plant and animal life) convey a paradoxical sense of being both rooted in the world and imbued "with a distinct sense of self-reliance." [44] [25] In her 2020 show at Locks Gallery, Belcourt departed from her characteristic oil works, presenting collages made of painted and cut gouache shapes, which nod to the energetic simplicity of Matisse's cutouts from the late 1940s. [48]

Awards and collections

Belcourt has been awarded a John S. Guggenheim Fellowship (2012), New York Foundation for the Arts Fellowship (2015), and Pollock-Krasner Foundation (2017, 2000) and Elizabeth Greenshields Foundation (1985, 1984) grants. [11] [49] [12] [50] [15] She has also received artists residencies from Yaddo (1992) and Millay Colony for the Arts (1990). [51] [52] Her work belongs to the public collections of the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, Cultural Ministry of Quebec, Aspen Contemporary Art Collection, Council for the Estate of Francis Picabia, and Fleming Museum of Art, as well as many corporate and private collections in Europe, the United States and Canada. [13] [14] [53] [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amy Sillman</span> American painter

Amy Sillman is a New York-based artist, known for process-based paintings that move between abstraction and figuration, and engage nontraditional media including animation, zines and installation. Her work draws upon art historical tropes, particularly postwar American gestural painting, as both influences and foils; she engages feminist critiques of the discourses of mastery, genius and power in order to introduce qualities such as humor, awkwardness, self-deprecation, affect and doubt into her practice. Profiles in The New York Times, ARTnews, Frieze, and Interview, characterize Sillman as championing "the relevance of painting" and "a reinvigorated mode of abstraction reclaiming the potency of active brushwork and visible gestures." Critic Phyllis Tuchman described Sillman as "an inventive abstractionist" whose "messy, multivalent, lively" art "reframes long-held notions regarding the look and emotional character of abstraction."

Cora Cohen is an American artist whose works include paintings, drawings, photographs, and altered x rays. Cohen is most known for her abstract paintings and is often identified as continuing the tradition of American Abstraction. The New York Times' critic Michael Brenson wrote of her 1984 exhibition, Portraits of Women: "The works are dense, brooding and yet elated. The turbulence of the paint not only looks but also feels like freedom." Cohen interviewed many other artists also associated with continuing the tradition of American Abstraction for Bomb Magazine including; Ralph Humphrey, Dona Nelson, Craig Fisher, Carl Ostendarp and Joan Mitchell. Her work has also been identified with traditions of European abstraction, and specifically German abstraction, including the work of Wols, Sigmar Polke, Gerhard Richter. She began exhibiting in Germany in the early nineties and continues to show at some of its most prestigious institutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julian Hatton</span> American artist

Julian Burroughs Hatton III is an American landscape abstract artist from New York City. The New York Times described his painting style as "vibrant, playful, semi-abstract landscapes" while New York Sun art critic John Goodrich compared him to French painter Bonnard. Hatton's abstract landscapes have been compared to paintings by Arthur Dove and Georgia O'Keeffe because of his "unbridled love of pure, hot color" similar to Gauguin and the Fauves, according to critic Ann Landi of ARTnews. Hatton's vision is of "a nature that you can literally eat with your eyes, eye candy transposed onto the entire world," according to critic Joel Silverstein.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dike Blair</span> American visual artist

Dike Blair is a New York-based artist, writer and teacher. His art consists of two parallel bodies of work: intimate, photorealistic paintings and installation-like sculptures assembled from common objects—often exhibited together—which examine overlooked and unexceptional phenomena of daily existence in both a romantic and ironic manner. Blair emerged out of the late 1970s New York art scene, and his work relates to concurrent movements such as the Pictures Generation, Minimalism and conceptual art, while remaining distinct from and tangential to them. New York Times critic Roberta Smith places his sculpture in a "blurred category" crossing "Carl Andre with ikebana, formalist abstraction with sleek anonymous hotel rooms, talk-show sets with home furnishings showrooms." Cameron Martin writes in Artforum that the paintings are "rendered with a lucidity that extracts something metaphysical from the mundane."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Katherine Bradford</span> American artist

Katherine Bradford, née Houston, is an American artist based in New York City, known for figurative paintings, particularly of swimmers, that critics describe as simultaneously representational, abstract and metaphorical. She began her art career relatively late and has received her widest recognition in her seventies. Critic John Yau characterizes her work as independent of canon or genre dictates, open-ended in terms of process, and quirky in its humor and interior logic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barbara Takenaga</span> American painter

Barbara Takenaga is an American artist known for swirling, abstract paintings that have been described as psychedelic and cosmic, as well as scientific, due to their highly detailed, obsessive patterning. She gained wide recognition in the 2000s, as critics such as David Cohen and Kenneth Baker placed her among a leading edge of artists renewing abstraction with paintings that emphasized visual beauty and excess, meticulous technique, and optical effects. Her work suggests possibilities that range from imagined landscapes and aerial maps to astronomical and meteorological phenomena to microscopic views of cells, aquatic creatures or mineral cross-sections. In a 2018 review, The New Yorker described Takenaga as "an abstractionist with a mystic’s interest in how the ecstatic can emerge from the laborious."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judith Linhares</span> American painter

Judith Linhares is an American painter, known for her vibrant, expressive figurative and narrative paintings. She came of age and gained recognition in the Bay Area culture of the 1960s and 1970s and has been based in New York City since 1980. Curator Marcia Tucker featured her in the influential New Museum show, "'Bad' Painting" (1978), and in the 1984 Venice Biennale show, "Paradise Lost/Paradise Regained: American Visions of the New Decade." Linhares synthesizes influences including Expressionism, Bay Area Figuration, Mexican modern art and second-wave feminism, in work that flirts with abstraction and balances visionary personal imagery, expressive intensity, and pictorial rigor. Art historian Whitney Chadwick wrote, "Linhares is an artist for whom painting has always mattered as the surest path of synthesizing experience and interior life," her works "emerging as if by magic from an alchemical stew of vivid complementary hues and muted tonalities." Critic John Yau describes her paintings "funny, strange, and disconcerting," while writer Susan Morgan called them "unexpected and indelible" images exploring "an oddly sublime territory where exuberant bliss remains inseparable from ominous danger."

Sarah Crowner is an American painter best known for her geometric abstractions that evoke the style of hard-edge painting of the 1950s and 60s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lisa Corinne Davis</span> American painter

Lisa Corinne Davis is an American visual artist known for abstract paintings and works on paper that suggest maps and other encoded forms of knowledge. She employs abstraction as a means of rendering the complexities of contemporary experience—including her own as an African-American woman—often questioning preconceived notions about identity, classification, and rationality versus subjectivity. Her densely layered, colorful work merges contrasting schemas, visual elements and formal languages, blurring distinctions between figuration and abstraction, real and fictive spaces and concepts, and microcosmic or macrocosmic reference. Brooklyn Rail critic Joan Waltemath wrote, "The urban experiences of space and time that Davis presents are subtle distillations of moment and coincidence ... Her attempt to map the shattered terrain of contemporary life points both to an awareness of other times and a belief in navigating the present one."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dona Nelson</span> American painter (born 1947)

Dona Nelson is an American painter, best known for immersive, gestural, primarily abstract works employing unorthodox materials, processes and formats to disrupt conventional notions of painting and viewership. A 2014 New Yorker review observed, "Nelson gives notice that she will do anything, short of burning down her house to bully painting into freshly spluttering eloquence." Since 2002, long before it became a more common practice, Nelson has produced free-standing, double-sided paintings that create a more complex, conscious viewing experience. According to New York Times critic Roberta Smith, Nelson has dodged the burden of a "superficially consistent style," sustained by "an adventuresome emphasis on materials" and an athletic approach to process that builds on the work of Jackson Pollock. Writers in Art in America and Artforum credit her experimentation with influencing a younger generation of painters exploring unconventional techniques with renewed interest. Discussing one of Nelson's visceral, process-driven works, curator Klaus Kertess wrote, the paint-soaked "muslin is at once the tool, the medium, and the made."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laurie Fendrich</span> American artist, writer and educator

Laurie Fendrich is an American artist, writer and educator based in New York City, best known for geometric abstract paintings that balance playfulness and sophistication. Her work has been featured in solo exhibitions in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, a retrospective at the Williamson Gallery at Scripps College (2010), and group shows at MoMA PS1, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, and the National Academy of Design, among many venues. She has received reviews in publications including The New York Times, Artforum, Art in America, Arts Magazine, ARTnewsPartisan Review, and New York Magazine. Fendrich has been awarded fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation (2016), Brown Foundation at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, and National Endowment for the Arts (1983–4). She has been an educator for more than four decades, notably at Hofstra University (1989–2014), and a regular essayist for The Chronicle Review at The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Natalie Edgar is an American abstract expressionist painter, a former critic for ARTnews, and a key writer and historian on the birth and development of abstract expressionism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judith Murray (artist)</span> American artist

Judith Murray is an American abstract painter based in New York City. Active since the 1970s, she has produced a wide-ranging, independent body of work while strictly adhering to idiosyncratic, self-imposed constants within her practice. Since 1975, she has limited herself to a primary palette of red, yellow, black and white paints—from which she mixes an infinite range of hues—and a near-square, horizontal format offset by a vertical bar painted along the right edge of the canvas; the bar serves as a visual foil for the rest of the work and acknowledges each painting’s boundary and status as an abstract object. Critic Lilly Wei describes Murray's work as "an extended soliloquy on how sensation, sensibility, and digressions can still be conveyed through paint" and how by embracing the factual world the "abstract artist can construct a supreme and sustaining fiction."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joanna Pousette-Dart</span> American visual artist (born 1947)

Joanna Pousette-Dart is an American abstract artist, based in New York City. She is best known for her distinctive shaped-canvas paintings, which typically consist of two or three stacked, curved-edge planes whose arrangements—from slightly precarious to nested—convey a sense of momentary balance with the potential to rock, tilt or slip. She overlays the planes with meandering, variable arabesque lines that delineate interior shapes and contours, often echoing the curves of the supports. Her work draws on diverse inspirations, including the landscapes of the American Southwest, Islamic, Mozarabic and Catalan art, Chinese landscape painting and calligraphy, and Mayan art, as well as early and mid-20th-century modernism. Critic John Yau writes that her shaped canvasses explore "the meeting place between abstraction and landscape, quietly expanding on the work of predecessors", through a combination of personal geometry and linear structure that creates "a sense of constant and latent movement."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judith Simonian</span> American painter

Judith Simonian is an American artist known for her montage-like paintings and early urban public art. She began her career as a significant participant in an emergent 1980s downtown Los Angeles art scene that spawned street art and performances, galleries and institutions such as Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions (LACE) and Los Angeles Institute of Contemporary Art (LAICA), before moving to New York City in 1985.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harriet Korman</span> American painter

Harriet Korman is an American abstract painter based in New York City, who first gained attention in the early 1970s. She is known for work that embraces improvisation and experimentation within a framework of self-imposed limitations that include simplicity of means, purity of color, and a strict rejection of allusion, illusion, naturalistic light and space, or other translations of reality. Writer John Yau describes Korman as "a pure abstract artist, one who doesn’t rely on a visual hook, cultural association, or anything that smacks of essentialization or the spiritual," a position he suggests few post-Warhol painters have taken. While Korman's work may suggest early twentieth-century abstraction, critics such as Roberta Smith locate its roots among a cohort of early-1970s women artists who sought to reinvent painting using strategies from Process Art, then most associated with sculpture, installation art and performance. Since the 1990s, critics and curators have championed this early work as unjustifiably neglected by a male-dominated 1970s art market and deserving of rediscovery.

Frances Barth is an American visual artist best known for paintings situated between abstraction, landscape and mapping, and in her later career, video and narrative works. She emerged during a period in which contemporary painters sought a way forward beyond 1960s minimalism and conceptualism, producing work that combined modernist formalism, geometric abstraction, referential elements and metaphor. Critic Karen Wilkin wrote, "Barth’s paintings play a variety of spatial languages against each other, from aerial views that suggest mapping, to suggestions of perspectival space, to relentless flatness … [she] questions the very pictorial conventions she deploys, creating ambiguous imagery and equally ambiguous space that seems to shift as we look."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amanda Church</span> American visual artist

Amanda Church is an American artist known for abstract paintings that reference the human figure and other discernible elements. Her works straddle representational and formalist art traditions, suggesting recognizable body parts, objects, and perspectival elements in an otherwise abstract field. Church's distinctive use of contrasting style elements has been consistently noted by critics such as Hyperallergic's Cora Fisher, who described Church's work as "whimsically overruling the left-right brain dichotomy as well as the traditionally gendered axis that divides geometric and decorative art." Church received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2015 and a Pollock-Krasner Foundation grant in 2017, among other awards. Her work has been covered in publications such as The New York Times, The Boston Globe, ARTnews, Hyperallergic and Forbes Magazine. Her paintings have been exhibited in major U.S. cities as well as internationally, in galleries and museums such as the Brooklyn Museum of Art and the Aldrich Museum. She lives and works in New York.

James Little is an American painter and curator. He is known for his works of geometric abstraction which are often imbued with exuberant color. He has been based in New York City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Bordo</span> Canadian-American painter

Robert Bordo is a New York-based, Canadian-American artist known for paintings that blend modernist formal concerns with postmodern approaches to image, subject matter and metaphor. Throughout his career, he has worked in painting series positioned between representation and abstraction that critics characterize as conceptually structured, yet sensual in execution. These series explore recurring, often overlapping themes, such as memory and experience, the passage of time, landscape and weather phenomena, mapping, and mark-making as an indicator of thought. New York Times critic Roberta Smith described Bordo's early map paintings as charting an idiosyncratic "hybrid discipline … a kind of cartographically conscious rerouting of modernism"; in a 2019 New Yorker review of his "crackup" paintings, Andrea Scott wrote, "Bordo's imagery is an apt metaphor for our current, contentious political climate, but his true subject is painting itself: how easily it can tip realism into abstraction or shift figure-ground relations until it's impossible to discern whether you’re on the inside looking out or vice versa."

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Yau, John. "Weekend Studio Visit with Louise Belcourt," Hyperallergic, January 25, 2015. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Butler, Sharon. "Louise Belcourt," The Brooklyn Rail, March 5, 2010, p.25. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Church, Amanda. "Louise Belcourt," ARTnews, June 2012, p. 97.
  4. 1 2 Volk, Gregory. "Big Brash Borough," Art in America, September 2004.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Johnson, Ken. "Louise Belcourt – 'Wriggling Philosophical Life'," The New York Times, May 7, 2004, p. E38. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Brody, David. "Louise Belcourt at Jeff Bailey Gallery," Artcritical, March 22, 2010. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  7. ↑ Cohen, David. "As Sprawling As Brooklyn Itself," The New York Sun, April 22, 2004.
  8. ↑ Yablonsky, Linda. "Borough sprawl," Time Out (New York), April 29–May 6, 2004.
  9. 1 2 Servetar, Stuart. Review, New York Press, July 10–16, 1996.
  10. ↑ McAdams Shane. "Manufacturing Dissent: The London Art Fairs," The Brooklyn Rail, November 2007, p. 35. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  11. 1 2 Artforum. "2012 Guggenheim Fellows Announced," News, April 12, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  12. 1 2 Greenberger, Alex. "New York Foundation for the Arts Announces 2015 Artists’ Fellowships," ARTnews, July 24, 2015. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 DeFeo, Ron. "A Conversation with Louise Belcourt," Latin American Literature and Arts, Spring 2003, p. 25-36.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lowry, Vicky. "Art Show: Louise Belcourt," Elle Décor, March 2012, p.20, 78–79. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  15. 1 2 3 Jeff Bailey Gallery. Louise Belcourt: Paintings, New York: Jeff Bailey Gallery, 2010.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Baird, Daniel. "Karin Davie and Louise Belcourt," Border Crossings, Vol. 24, No.3, Issue 95, 2005, p. 49–50.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Smith, Roberta. "A Physical Abstractionist," The New York Times, March 15, 1996, p. C27. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  18. ↑ Weatherspoon Art Museum. Art on Paper, Greensboro, NC: Weatherspoon Art Museum, 2008.
  19. 1 2 3 Goodman, Jonathan. "Louise Belcourt at Peter Blum," Art in America, November 1997.
  20. 1 2 3 Webster, Peter. "Louise Belcourt Creates an Aesthetic Hedge Fund," New York Home, September–October 2005.
  21. ↑ Martinières, Cécile. "Les Toiles Érogènes," Teknikart, June 2001.
  22. 1 2 Boudier, Laurent and Benedicte Phillippe. "Louise Belcourt," Telerama Paris, February 26, 2007, p. 26.
  23. ↑ Harambourg Lydia. "Louise Belcourt," La Gazette De L'Hotel Drouot, February 2007, p. 147–148.
  24. ↑ Baker, Kenneth. Reviews, The San Francisco Chronicle, September 17, 2005.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Newhall, Edith. "Galleries: Louise Belcourt at Locks Gallery," The Philadelphia Inquirer, January 22, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Greenbaum, Joanne. "An Interview with Louise Belcourt," BOMB, February 16, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Sitkin, Rachel. "Imaginary Vistas," Artblog, January 13, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  28. ↑ Yau, John. "Why There Are Great Artists," Hyperallergic, March 31, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  29. 1 2 3 Nahas, Dominique. "Louise Belcourt," 'Review, April 15, 1997.
  30. 1 2 New York Magazine. "Art On View," New York Magazine, p. 80 April 7, 1997.
  31. 1 2 3 Clarke, Bill. "Louise Belcourt: New Paintings," Magenta Magazine, Spring 2010. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  32. ↑ Bell, J. Bowyer. "Louise Belcourt," Review, April 15, 1997.
  33. 1 2 3 Volk, Gregory. "Louise Belcourt," ARTNews, September 1997.
  34. 1 2 Long, Robert. "Moving Photos, Bland Paintings," The East Hampton Star, May 30, 2003.
  35. ↑ Baird, Daniel. "Open House: Working in Brooklyn," The Brooklyn Rail, May 2004, p. 12–13. Retrieved February 20, 2020.
  36. ↑ Finkel, Jori. "Critic’s Picks," Time Out (New York), February 8–15, 2001.
  37. 1 2 The New Yorker. "Three Painters," January 29, 2001.
  38. ↑ Louise Belcourt website. Work, 2001–2008. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  39. 1 2 3 Henry, Max. "Louise Belcourt," Time Out (New York), May 13–20, 2004.
  40. ↑ Maine, Stephen. "Dateline Brooklyn," Artnet, May 25, 2004.
  41. ↑ The New Yorker. "This Is Not About Landscape," August 4, 2008.
  42. ↑ Maine, Stephen. "A Wild Horizon," The New York Sun, July 5, 2007.
  43. ↑ Louise Belcourt website. Work, 2009–2012. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  44. 1 2 3 Mir, Stan. "Light Makes Things Real," Hyperllergic, January 28, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  45. ↑ Louise Belcourt website. Work, 2013–2014. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  46. ↑ Moran, Ali. "Louise Belcourt: 'Mounds' at Jeff Bailey Gallery," Surface, March 5, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  47. ↑ Louise Belcourt website. Work, 2015–2017. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  48. ↑ Two Coats of Paint. "Ideas and Influences: Louise Belcourt," November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  49. ↑ John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. "Louise Belcourt," Fellows. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  50. ↑ Pollock-Krasner Foundation. "Louise Belcourt," Past Grantees. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  51. ↑ Yaddo. Visual Artists. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  52. ↑ The Millay Colony for the Arts. 1991 Residency. Retrieved February 19, 2020.
  53. ↑ Fleming Museum of Art. New Turf, Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 2005.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.