Mauryan polish

Last updated
Mauryan polish
Sarnath capital.jpg
The Lion Capital of Ashoka from Sarnath, one of the finest examples of Mauryan polish.
MaterialPolished sandstone
Period/culture3rd Century BCE
Place India.

Mauryan polish describes one of the frequent characteristics of architecture and sculptures of the Maurya Empire in India (325 to 185 BCE), which gives a very smooth and shiny surface to the stone material, generally of sandstone or granite. [1] Mauryan polish is found especially in the Ashoka Pillars as well as in some constructions like the Barabar Caves. The technique did not end with the empire, but continued to be "used on occasion up to the first or second century A.D.", [2] although the presence of the polish sometimes complicates dating, as with the Didarganj Yakshi. According to the archaeologist John Marshall: the "extraordinary precision and accuracy which characterizes all Mauryan works, and which has never, we venture to say, been surpassed even by the finest workmanship on Athenian buildings". [3]

Contents

Polished Barabar Caves

Gopika cave Anantavarman inscription.jpg
Sudama cave mirror-polished walls.jpg
Polishing "mirror-like" granite walls. [4] Left: wall of the corridor entrance of the Gopika cave in the Barabar Caves (mirror effect accentuated by the flat angle of the photograph). Right: interior of the Sudama cave, also one of the Barabar caves, with reflection of a monk. These quasi-perfect walls were dug into the rock and polished before 261 BC, date of the rather clumsy inscriptions of Ashoka.

The Barabar caves are the first known and dated example of Mauryan polish, dedicated by Ashoka in several inscriptions, in the year 12 and the year 19 of his reign. The caves were carved from granite, an extremely hard rock, and finished with a very fine polishing of the inner surface, giving a mirror effect of great flatness, as well as an echo effect. [5] [4] This large-scale polish directly evokes polishing on smaller surfaces of the Maurya statuary, particularly visible on the pillars and capitals of the pillars of Ashoka.

The knowledge and skills for such polishing seems to have disappeared again after the Maurya period, as subsequent caves, such as the Ajanta Caves, do not have polished surfaces. [6] [7]

At Barabar Caves, some caves were dedicated through inscription by Ashoka (the caves of the Barabar group), and by his grandson and successor Dasaratha Maurya (the caves of the Nagarjuni group). Both group of caves have perfectly polished walls, suggesting that polishing techniques were not exclusive to Ashoka, and continued for some time after his reign.

Later Caves

After the Barabar Caves, the polishing of cave walls was abandoned, never to be revived, despite the huge efforts at building Buddhist and Jain caves until the 6th century CE. Such grandiose caves as Karla Caves (1st century CE) or the Ajanta Caves (5th century CE) do not have any polishing either. This may be due to the fact that Mauryan caves were dedicated and sponsored by the Mauryan Imperial government, allowing for huge resources and efforts to be spent, whereas later caves where essentially the result of donations by individuals, who could not afford as high a level of spending. [8]

Pillars of Ashoka

A highly polished pillar of Ashoka, Lauriya-Araraj. Ashoka pillar, Lauriya-Araraj.jpg
A highly polished pillar of Ashoka, Lauriya-Araraj.

The pillars of Ashoka, made of sandstone, generally also exhibit a high level of Mauryan polish. Here again the mirror-like polish has generally been considered as an import from the Near-East, but some authors now consider the Son Bhandar Caves might constitute a precedent and an evolutionary step to this type of polish, although these caves are generally dated to a much later period (2-4th century CE). [9]

The pillars

Polished surface of a pillar. Ashoka Lauriya Areraj inscription.jpg
Polished surface of a pillar.

All known Mauryan pillars have the characteristic mirror-like polish, although most were left unpolished over the surface of the bottom part meant to be buried in the ground. [10]

Inscriptions were made over the polished finish, with the ungainly result that the polished stone is chipped around the letters. Normally, the text should be inscribed first, and only then should the stone be polished if a good result is to be obtained. This tends to suggest that the inscriptions were made as an afterthought, after the pillar has been properly completed.

The capitals

Some of the capitals of the pillars of Ashoka exhibit mirror-like polish (such as the Sarnath and the Sanchi capitals), while others don't and only have a smooth surface (the Sankissa capital or the Rampurva bull elephant). This, together with epigraphical considerations, has even led some authors to question if these non-polished capital might be of a time prior to Ashoka. [11]

These non-polished pillars are also those that display the highest level of Hellenistic influence: in the case of the Rampurva bull or the Sankassa elephant, the abacus is composed of honeysuckles alternated with stylized palmettes and small rosettes. [12] A similar kind of design can be seen in the frieze of the lost capital of the Allahabad pillar. These designs likely originated in Greek and Near-Eastern arts. [13]

Mauryan statuary

The Lohanipur torso, possibly a Jain Tirthankara, 3rd century BCE, discovered in Lohanipur, now in Patna Museum. Lohanipur torso.jpg
The Lohanipur torso, possibly a Jain Tirthankara, 3rd century BCE, discovered in Lohanipur, now in Patna Museum.

There are many examples of polished stone statuettes and artifacts from the Mauryan period. One of them, the Masarh lion, discovered near Patna, is special in that its style is nearly completely Achaemenid, which suggests a high level of artistic influence from Western Asia at the time the statuette was made.

The Masarh lion, discovered near Pataliputra and dated to the 3rd century BCE, is carved in sandstone of the Chunar type, like the Ashoka Pillars, and its finish is polished. [1] The sculptural style is also indisputably Achaemenid [1] This is particularly visible with the well-ordered tubular representation of whiskers (vibrissas), and the geometrical representation of inflated veins flush within the whole face. [1] The mane on the other hand, with the tufts of hair represented in ripples, is rather naturalistic. [1] According to SP Gupta, these stylistic characteristics can be described as non-Indian. [1] Very similar examples of sculptures are known in Greece and in Persepolis. [1] It is possible that this sculpture was made by an Achaemenid or Greek sculptor in India and either remained without effect, or was the Indian imitation of a Greek or Achaemenid model, somewhere between the 5th and the 1st century BCE, although it is generally dated from the time of the Maurya Empire, around the 3rd century BCE. [1]

According to John Boardman, the lion sculpture of Marsarh is "quite Persian", although the treatment of the mane is rather of Greek naturalistic style and breaks with the rigid and codified style of the Achaemenid Empire. [14] For him, the lions of the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath represent the next logical and artistic step, and would be the realization of Hellenistic Greek artists to soften and give more naturality to Persian style. [14]

There are also a few examples of polished statuary, all dated to the Mauryan period, such as the polished sculpture of a head from Sarnath.

The Diamond throne of Bodhgaya is another example. It was established by Ashoka at Bodh Gaya and also exhibits the characteristic Mauryan polish. [15]

Polished ringstones are variously said to be Mauryan or Sunga, dating ranging for the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century BCE. [16]

Didarganj Yakshi

The Didarganj Yakshi is generally considered as one of the finest examples of Mauryan art. [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] Alternatively, it is rather dated to the 2nd century CE, based on the analysis of shape and ornamentation. According to some art historians, the treatment of the forelock in particular is said to be characteristically Kushan. [24]

The Didarganj Yakshi, generally dated to Mauryan periods 3rd century BC while some date it to Kushan period Didarganj Yakshi statue in the Bihar Museum.jpg
The Didarganj Yakshi, generally dated to Mauryan periods 3rd century BC while some date it to Kushan period

Post-Mauryan near abandonment of polishing techniques

After the Mauryan period, the general sculptural trend is towards the complete abandon of polishing techniques. This may be due to the high cost involved with polishing. The end of the Mauryan period marked the end of imperial patronage of the arts, which tended to be financed by the people or the wealthy merchant class thereafter. [25] There are however a few important cases of polishing that seem to subsist. [26]

The Parkam Yaksha "Manibhadra" is made of polished grey sandstone, in the same material as the Pillars of Ashoka. This statue is generally dated to the 3rd-1st centuries BCE, and may be immediately post-Mauryan. [26] It may be a transitional from the Mauryan period to next period including the reliefs of Bharhut, presenting some continuity in the finishing technique, but a real fracture in terms of sculptural style. [26]

The Didarganj Yakshi, although claimed by some as an example of Mauryan art [27] is generally dated to the 2nd century CE, based on the analysis of shape and ornamentation. [28] [29] [22] This life-size standing image is tall, well-proportioned, free-standing sculpture is made of sandstone with well polished surface. [30] This statue, if the 2 century CE date is upheld, would suggest that polishing technique in fact did not disappear with the Mauryas, but remained in India, and was simply little used, possibly because of the high labor and cost involved.

Debate on Achaemenid vs Pre-Mauryan origins

Types of polish and coating techniques Mauryans may have used. Mauryan Polish, Sculptures in Buff Sandstone. New Delhi Museum.jpg
Types of polish and coating techniques Mauryans may have used.

Achaemenid sculptural art was often characterized by a great level of polishing of the stone (usually sandstone, a very soft material), and it is thought that this polishing influenced the Maurya polishing, as is visible in the architecture of the columns of Pataliputra. [31] [32] [33] Stones and polishing grains have been found in the ruins of Persepolis. [33] These polishing techniques were also used by the Greeks, who used the natural Naxos emery grains. [34]

It is believed that the stone-making techniques employed by the Mauryas may have derived from the techniques of Achaemenid statuary, stone-working and polishing techniques having spread to India after the destruction of the empire by Alexander the Great in 330 BCE and the displacement of Persian and Perso-Greek artists and technicians. [6]

According to Gupta, the polishing of rocks could have a local origin. He invokes the existence of polishing technologies of the neolithic, visible in various stone tools such as axes. There is, however, no trace of evolution from these neolithical tools to polished stone architecture, and the Barabar caves are essentially a sudden technological break with no local history, suggesting the import of these techniques from another culture. Nor are there any known examples of stone architecture in India before the Maurya period. [35] According to Gupta, the Son Bhandar Caves could be such an intermediate stage, relatively unique, and subject to questioning its chronology, since it is generally dated to the 2nd-4th centuries CE. [35] The polish was achieved by application of agate burnisher which was later applied on pillars and sandstone objects. [36] [37] Some examples of Indus Valley civilisation statuary (Harappa, Mohenjo-daro, circa 3000-2000 BCE) do show a certain level of polishing. [38] [39]

Pataliputra Voussoir fragment made of granite stone discovered by K. P Jayaswal had mauryan polish but was dated to pre Mauryan Nanda period due to three archaic brahmi letters which paleographically appeared before mauryan period Brahmi. The voussoir has been analysed to be part of trefoil arch which decorated a torana gate. [40] [41] [42]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarnath</span> Historical city in Uttar Pradesh, India

Sarnath is a place located 10 kilometres northeast of Varanasi, near the confluence of the Ganges and the Varuna rivers in Uttar Pradesh, India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sanchi</span> Buddhist complex in Madhya Pradesh, India

Sanchi Stupa is a Buddhist complex, famous for its Great Stupa, on a hilltop at Sanchi Town in Raisen District of the State of Madhya Pradesh, India. It is located, about 23 kilometers from Raisen town, district headquarter and 46 kilometres (29 mi) north-east of Bhopal, capital of Madhya Pradesh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Architecture of India</span>

Indian architecture is rooted in the history, culture, and religion of India. Among several architectural styles and traditions, the best-known include the many varieties of Hindu temple architecture and Indo-Islamic architecture, especially Rajput architecture, Mughal architecture, South Indian architecture, and Indo-Saracenic architecture. Early Indian architecture was made from wood, which did not survive due to rotting and instability in the structures. Instead, the earliest existing architecture are made with Indian rock-cut architecture, including many Buddhist, Hindu, and Jain temples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dasharatha Maurya</span> Mauryan emperor from c.232 to c.224 BCE

Dasharatha Maurya was the 4th Mauryan emperor from 232 to 224 BCE. He was a grandson of Ashoka the Great and is commonly held to have succeeded him as the Emperor of Magadha. Dasharatha presided over a declining imperium and several territories of the empire broke away from central rule during his reign. He had continued the religious and social policies of Ashoka. Dasharatha was the last Mauryan emperor to have issued imperial inscriptions—thus the last Mauryan emperor to be known from epigraphical sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pillars of Ashoka</span> Series of monolithic columns on the Indian subcontinent

The pillars of Ashoka are a series of monolithic columns dispersed throughout the Indian subcontinent, erected—or at least inscribed with edicts—by the 3rd Mauryan Emperor Ashoka the Great, who reigned from c. 268 to 232 BC. Ashoka used the expression Dhaṃma thaṃbhā, i.e. "pillars of the Dharma" to describe his own pillars. These pillars constitute important monuments of the architecture of India, most of them exhibiting the characteristic Mauryan polish. Twenty of the pillars erected by Ashoka still survive, including those with inscriptions of his edicts. Only a few with animal capitals survive of which seven complete specimens are known. Two pillars were relocated by Firuz Shah Tughlaq to Delhi. Several pillars were relocated later by Mughal Empire rulers, the animal capitals being removed. Averaging between 12 and 15 m in height, and weighing up to 50 tons each, the pillars were dragged, sometimes hundreds of miles, to where they were erected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chaitya</span> Prayer hall from Buddhist tradition

A chaitya, chaitya hall, chaitya-griha, refers to a shrine, sanctuary, temple or prayer hall in Indian religions. The term is most common in Buddhism, where it refers to a space with a stupa and a rounded apse at the end opposite the entrance, and a high roof with a rounded profile. Strictly speaking, the chaitya is the stupa itself, and the Indian buildings are chaitya halls, but this distinction is often not observed. Outside India, the term is used by Buddhists for local styles of small stupa-like monuments in Nepal, Cambodia, Indonesia and elsewhere. In Thailand a stupa itself, not a stupa hall, is called a chedi, a local Thai word derived from the Pali Cetiya. In the historical texts of Jainism and Hinduism, including those relating to architecture, chaitya refers to a temple, sanctuary or any sacred monument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sculpture in the Indian subcontinent</span>

Sculpture in the Indian subcontinent, partly because of the climate of the Indian subcontinent makes the long-term survival of organic materials difficult, essentially consists of sculpture of stone, metal or terracotta. It is clear there was a great deal of painting, and sculpture in wood and ivory, during these periods, but there are only a few survivals. The main Indian religions had all, after hesitant starts, developed the use of religious sculpture by around the start of the Common Era, and the use of stone was becoming increasingly widespread.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mauryan art</span> Art produced during the Mauryan Empire

Mauryan art is art produced during the period of the Mauryan Empire, the first empire to rule over most of the Indian subcontinent, between 322 and 185 BCE. It represented an important transition in Indian art from the use of wood to stone. It was a royal art patronized by Mauryan kings, most notably Ashoka. Pillars, stupas and caves are its most prominent surviving examples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian rock-cut architecture</span> The creation of structures, buildings, and sculptures by excavating solid rock

Indian rock-cut architecture is more various and found in greater abundance in that country than any other form of rock-cut architecture around the world. Rock-cut architecture is the practice of creating a structure by carving it out of solid natural rock. Rock that is not part of the structure is removed until the only rock left makes up the architectural elements of the excavated interior. Indian rock-cut architecture is mostly religious in nature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barabar Caves</span> Ancient rock-cut caves in India with Ashokan inscriptions

The Barabar Hill Caves are the oldest surviving rock-cut caves in India, dating from the Maurya Empire, some with Ashokan inscriptions, located in the Makhdumpur region of Jehanabad district, Bihar, India, 24 km (15 mi) north of Gaya.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarnath Museum</span> Archaeology museum in Saranath

Sarnath Museum is the oldest site museum of the Archaeological Survey of India. It houses the findings and excavations at the archaeological site of Sarnath, by the Archaeological Survey of India. Sarnath is located near Varanasi, in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The museum has 6,832 sculptures and artefacts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lion Capital of Ashoka</span> Capital of a column of Mauryan emperor Ashoka in Sarnath, Uttar Pradesh, India

The Lion Capital of Ashoka is the capital, or head, of a column erected by the Mauryan emperor Ashoka in Sarnath, India, c. 250 BCE. Its crowning features are four life-sized lions set back to back on a drum-shaped abacus. The side of the abacus is adorned with wheels in relief, and interspersing them, four animals, a lion, an elephant, a bull, and a galloping horse follow each other from right to left. A bell-shaped lotus forms the lowest member of the capital, and the whole 2.1 metres (7 ft) tall, carved out of a single block of sandstone and highly polished, was secured to its monolithic column by a metal dowel. Erected after Ashoka's conversion to Buddhism, it commemorated the site of Gautama Buddha's first sermon some two centuries before.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley</span> Ancient Persian conquest in the Indian subcontinent

Around 535 BCE, the Persian king Cyrus the Great initiated a protracted campaign to absorb parts of India into his nascent Achaemenid Empire. In this initial incursion, the Persian army annexed a large region to the west of the Indus River, consolidating the early eastern borders of their new realm. With a brief pause after Cyrus' death around 530 BCE, the campaign continued under Darius the Great, who began to re-conquer former provinces and further expand the Achaemenid Empire's political boundaries. Around 518 BCE, the Persian army pushed further into India to initiate a second period of conquest by annexing regions up to the Jhelum River in what is today known as Punjab. At peak, the Persians managed to take control of most of modern-day Pakistan and incorporate it into their territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lomas Rishi Cave</span> Cave in Bihar, India

The Lomas Rishi Cave, also called the Grotto of Lomas Rishi, is one of the man-made Barabar Caves in the Barabar and Nagarjuni hills of Jehanabad district in the Indian state of Bihar. This rock-cut cave was carved out as a sanctuary. It was built during the Ashokan period of the Maurya Empire in the 3rd century BC, as part of the sacred architecture of the Ajivikas, an ancient religious and philosophical group of India that competed with Jainism and became extinct over time. Ājīvikas were atheists and rejected ritualism of the Puranic karma Kāṇḍa as well as Buddhist ideas. They were ascetic communities and meditated in the Barabar caves. Still, the Lomas Rishi cave lacks an explicit epigraphical dedication to the Ajivikas, contrary to most other Barabar Caves, and may rather have been built by Ashoka for the Buddhists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pataliputra capital</span>

The Pataliputra capital is a monumental rectangular capital with volutes and Classical Greek designs, that was discovered in the palace ruins of the ancient Mauryan Empire capital city of Pataliputra. It is dated to the 3rd century BCE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hellenistic influence on Indian art</span>

Hellenistic influence on Indian art and architecture reflects the artistic and architectural influence of the Greeks on Indian art following the conquests of Alexander the Great, from the end of the 4th century BCE to the first centuries of the common era. The Greeks in effect maintained a political presence at the doorstep, and sometimes within India, down to the 1st century CE with the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom and the Indo-Greek Kingdoms, with many noticeable influences on the arts of the Maurya Empire especially. Hellenistic influence on Indian art was also felt for several more centuries during the period of Greco-Buddhist art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Son Bhandar Caves</span> Artificial caves in Bihar, India

The Son Bhandar Caves are two man-made caves carved into the base of the Vaibhar Hills in Rajgir in the state of Bihar in India. Based on the dedicatory inscription found in the largest cave — which uses Gupta script of the 4th century CE — the caves are generally dated to the 3rd or 4th century CE, although some authors have suggested the caves could actually go back to the period of the Maurya Empire, possibly as early as 319 BCE. The main cave is rectangular with a trapezoidal entrance and a vaulted ceiling, reminiscent of the structure of the earlier Barabar Caves. The quality of the polish and the finish are nevertheless much inferior to that of the Barabar Caves. The stone of Son Bhandar is also much less hard than the granite of the Barabar caves, and therefore did not require the same degree of effort and technique.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Masarh lion</span>

The Masarh lion is a stone sculpture found at Masarh, a village near Arrah town in the Bhojpur district of the Indian state of Bihar. This sculpture is generally dated to the 3rd century B.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buddhist caves in India</span> Various man-made, often monk-made Buddhist caves throughout India

The Buddhist caves in India. Maharashtra state Aurangabad Dist. Ellora caves form an important part of Indian rock-cut architecture, and are among the most prolific examples of rock-cut architecture around the world. There are more than 1,500 known rock cut structures in India, out of which about 1000 were made by Buddhists, 300 by Hindus, and 200 by Jains. Many of these structures contain works of art of global importance, and many later caves from the Mahayana period are adorned with exquisite stone carvings. These ancient and medieval structures represent significant achievements of structural engineering and craftsmanship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Indian architecture</span> Architecture of India from the Bronze Age to the 9th century CE

Ancient Indian architecture ranges from the Indian Bronze Age to around 800 CE. By this endpoint Buddhism in India had greatly declined, and Hinduism was predominant, and religious and secular building styles had taken on forms, with great regional variation, which they largely retain even after some forceful changes brought about by the arrival of first Islam, and then Europeans.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 The roots of Indian Art, Gupta, p .88
  2. ↑ Harle, 24
  3. ↑ The Early History of India by Vincent A Smith
  4. 1 2 Ashoka in Ancient India by Nayanjot Lahiri p. 231
  5. ↑ Michell, George (1989). The Penguin guide to the monuments of India. London: Penguin. ISBN   0140081445.
  6. 1 2 Maharashtra, Marg Publications, 1985, p. 209 Pdf p. 2 "The surface of the inside walls are polished to a mirror-like finish, an exclusive characteristics of Mauryan architecture and sculpture, first derived through the media of Achaemenid art after the disintegration of the Persian Empire in AD 330 and the dispersal of skilled Persian and Perso-Greek artisans "
  7. ↑ Indian History p. 268
  8. ↑ Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist architecture, p.99
  9. ↑ Buddhist Architecture, Le Huu Phuoc, Grafikol, 2009, p.45
  10. ↑ Le Huu Phuoc, Buddhist Architecture, p.36
  11. ↑ John Irwin, "The true chronology of Ashokan pillars", p.147
  12. ↑ Le, Huu Phuoc (29 October 2017). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. ISBN   9780984404308 . Retrieved 29 October 2017– via Google Books.
  13. ↑ Le, Huu Phuoc (29 October 2017). Buddhist Architecture. Grafikol. ISBN   9780984404308 . Retrieved 29 October 2017– via Google Books.
  14. 1 2 The Origins of Indian Stone Architecture, 1998, John Boardman p.18.
  15. ↑ The Origins of Indian Stone Architecture, 1998, John Boardman pp. 13-22.
  16. 1 2 Gupta, The Roots of Indian Art, p.53
  17. ↑ Chatterjee, Partha; Ghosh, Anjan (2006). History and the Present. Anthem Press. ISBN   9781843312246.
  18. ↑ Ganguly, Keya (2010). Cinema, Emergence, and the Films of Satyajit Ray. University of California Press. ISBN   9780520262164.
  19. ↑ Kumar, Amitava (2014-03-10). A Matter of Rats: A Short Biography of Patna. Duke University Press. ISBN   9780822376453.
  20. ↑ "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century" by Upinder Singh, Pearson Education India, 2008
  21. ↑ ""Ayodhya, Archaeology After Demolition: A Critique of the "new" and "fresh" Discoveries", by Dhaneshwar Mandal, Orient Blackswan, 2003, p.69
  22. 1 2 "A Companion to Asian Art and Architecture" by Deborah S. Hutton, John Wiley & Sons, 2015, p.435
  23. ↑ Huntington, John C. and Susan L., The Huntington Archive - Ohio State University , accessed 30 August 2011.
  24. ↑ Pereira, Jose (2001). Monolithic Jinas. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 11. ISBN   9788120823976.
  25. ↑ Le Huu Phuoc, p.45
  26. 1 2 3 4 Smith, Vincent Arthur (2012). Art of India. Parkstone International. p. 43. ISBN   9781780428802.
  27. ↑ Chaudhary, Pranava K (28 September 2006). "A fortress chockfull of chinks". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 17 February 2011.
  28. ↑ "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century" by Upinder Singh, Pearson Education India, 2008
  29. ↑ ""Ayodhya, Archaeology After Demolition: A Critique of the "new" and "fresh" Discoveries", by Dhaneshwar Mandal, Orient Blackswan, 2003, p.46
  30. ↑ "A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century" by Upinder Singh, Pearson Education India, 2008 p.364
  31. ↑ Sailendra Nath Sen's Ancient Indian History and Civilization p.118
  32. ↑ Foreign Influence In Ancient India, by Jairazbhoy, Publication date 1963 p.45
  33. 1 2 "The extremely hard emery of Armenia, which was under the Achaemenid hegemony, seems to be the closest natural source for polishing the Persepolis, Pasargadae, and Susā royal palace stones" Hunt, 2008 in "Tectonic Evolution, Collision, and Seismicity of Southwest Asia, Rasul Sorkhabi p.33
  34. ↑ "For efficient polishing, Greeks used emery (Mohs 8) from the rich deposits of the Cycladic island of Naxos." in A Companion to Greek Art, published by Tyler Jo Smith, Dimitris Plantzos p.242
  35. 1 2 Gupta, The roots of Indian Art, p.194-
  36. ↑ Brown, Percy (2013-04-16). Indian Architecture (Buddhist and Hindu Period). Read Books Ltd. ISBN   9781447498575.
  37. ↑ Devahuti, D. (1971). "Mauryan Art and the "Episode" Theory". Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 52 (1/4): 161–173. JSTOR   41688719.
  38. 1 2 "...the "Priest-King's" head is so carefully tapered and polished." in Jansen, Michael; Mulloy, Máire; Urban, Günter (1991). Forgotten cities on the Indus: early civilization in Pakistan from the 8th to the 2nd millennium BC. Verlag Philipp von Zabern. p. 169. ISBN   9783805311717.
  39. 1 2 Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Pearson Education India. ISBN   9788131711200.
  40. ↑ The Calcutta University (1923). Proceedinds And Transactions Of The Second Oriental Conference (1923).
  41. ↑ Spooner, Brainerd (1924). Annual Report Of The Archaeological Survey Of India 1921-22.
  42. ↑ Chandra, Ramaprasad (1927). Memoirs of the archaeological survey of India no.30.
  43. ↑ Honour, Hugh; Fleming, John (2005). A World History of Art. Laurence King Publishing. p. 65. ISBN   9781856694513.
  44. ↑ Kleiner, Fred S. (2009). Gardner's Art through the Ages: Non-Western Perspectives. Cengage Learning. p. 11. ISBN   9780495573678.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.