Nuclear power in Denmark

Last updated
A mural of the Smiling Sun anti-nuclear symbol from 1976 on Vestergade in Aarhus. Smiling sun mural in Vestergade, Aarhus (2014-01-23).jpg
A mural of the Smiling Sun anti-nuclear symbol from 1976 on Vestergade in Aarhus.

Denmark imports but does not produce nuclear energy, which is in accordance with a 1985 law passed by the Danish parliament, prohibiting power production from nuclear energy. [1] [2] [3] In 2014 and 2015, imported nuclear power accounted for 3-4% of electricity consumption in Denmark. [4]

Contents

Beginning in the 1950s, the Danish government funded efforts to research and establish nuclear power plants in Denmark through the Danish Atomic Energy Commission and the Risø National Laboratory. [5] Anti-nuclear sentiment within Denmark increased in the early 1970s following the Three Mile Island accident and the construction of the controversial Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant. Protests made by the Organisationen til Oplysning om Atomkraft (English: Organisation for Nuclear Information; OOA) and dissent among the majority of voters led the Danish government to halt the rollout of a nuclear power program in 1976, and eventually prohibit the generation of nuclear power in 1985. [6]

In reaction to climate change, the 21st century has seen renewed interest in Denmark in nuclear energy production as an alternative to the use of fossil fuels. [7] [8] In August 2023, a Gallup poll showed that 55% of Denmark's population views nuclear power favourably, compared to 26% against. [9]

History

Post-war research

Denmark invested in nuclear research relatively late compared to other European nations due to American and British reluctance to allow Denmark's most prominent scientist, Niels Bohr, to divulge the knowledge he gained during the Manhattan project. Bohr was acutely aware of this fact, and as the rest of the scientific establishment followed his lead at the time, very little progress was made until the early 1950s. Following the 1953 Atoms for Peace speech, these tight restrictions were relaxed. After a 1955 American sponsored campaign from the US Information Service called "Atomet i Hverdagen" (English: The Atom in Everyday Life), the majority of Danes anticipated that nuclear energy would be "more of a boon than a curse to mankind". [5]

In December 1955, the Danish Atomic Energy Commission (Danish: Atomenergikommissionen, AEK) was established. The Commission consisted of 24 members, with Bohr as its chairman, and had oversight over the development and promotion of nuclear energy in Denmark. The AEK established a nuclear research site in Risø which was officially inaugurated on 6 June 1958. [5] [10]

Risø National Laboratory

The former Riso National Laboratory on the edge of Roskilde Fjord, which was the site of Denmarks only nuclear reactors between 1957 and 2003. The two outermost cylindrical buildings on the peninsula contained the reactors DR-2 and DR-3. RISOE.jpg
The former Risø National Laboratory on the edge of Roskilde Fjord, which was the site of Denmarks only nuclear reactors between 1957 and 2003. The two outermost cylindrical buildings on the peninsula contained the reactors DR-2 and DR-3.

In its first three decades, the Risø National Laboratory's activities were centred around research on the peaceful use of nuclear energy. Between 1957 and 1960, three research nuclear reactors opened at Risø, which had been imported from or based on designs from the United States and United Kingdom: DR-1, DR-2 and DR-3 (DR: Danish Reactor, Dansk Reaktor). These reactors were not designed to produce power, but to be used for the training of power plant technicians and for producing radioisotopes for scientific and medical use. The institute also attempted to develop its own reactor design to be the model for Danish power reactors—an organic liquid cooled, heavy water moderated design called the Deuterium Organic Reactor (DOR). However, the institute failed to convince Danish power utilities to support it and their plans were never realised. Later attempts to partner with Sweden's AB Atomenergi to develop a heavy water reactor also failed due to a lack of collaboration and economic viability. [5]

Following increasing anti-nuclear sentiment within Denmark in the early 1970s, the Danish government halted the rollout of a nuclear power program in 1976, until a clear plan for the disposal of nuclear waste could be formalised. As a result the laboratory at Risø found itself at a standstill, especially after the prohibition of nuclear energy in 1985, and began shifting its focus towards research into other energy sources. [5] By the turn of the 21st century, Risø was particularly noted for its research related to wind energy, solid-oxide fuel cells, and climate change.[ citation needed ]

Beginning in 2003, the three nuclear research reactors at the former Risø National Laboratory were decommissioned along with the adjacent hot cell facility, fuel fabrication plant, and nuclear waste management plant. [2] [11] As of 2024, the decommissioning process of DR-3, the hot cells, and the nuclear waste management plant is still ongoing. The decommissioning of DR-1 (completed 2006), DR-2 (completed 2008), and fuel fabrication plant (completed 2023) has been completed. [12]

The laboratory employed about 700 staff in 2005, at which point it was a research institute under the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. In 2007, the laboratory was merged into the Technical University of Denmark and was made an official institute of university in 2008 before being dissolved in 2012 when its facilities were transformed into a second campus of the university.[ citation needed ]

Anti-nuclear sentiment and nuclear ban

The Smiling Sun symbol, developed by the Danish anti-nuclear group OOA in 1975. It states "Nuclear Power? No thanks" in Danish. Atomkraft nej tak.pdf
The Smiling Sun symbol, developed by the Danish anti-nuclear group OOA in 1975. It states "Nuclear Power? No thanks" in Danish.

The 1973 oil crisis brought the development of nuclear power in Denmark back into public focus. Concerned about the safety of nuclear power plants, their economics and the wider threat to world peace posed by nuclear technology, the OOA was founded in January 1974 by students in Copenhagen. [13] [14] [6] They campaigned against the construction of nuclear power facilities in Denmark, and instead advocated for greater use of coal, natural gas, and biogas, along with energy-saving measures and an increased focus on the development of wind and solar technology. [14] [15] Anne Lund created the Smiling Sun anti-nuclear symbol to support OOA's cause, which has since gained global use among anti-nuclear advocates. [6]

The OOA arranged peaceful demonstrations and information campaigns. [13] Following the opening of the Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant in Sweden, just 20km from Copenhagen, they began organizing demonstrations in front of the Swedish Embassy and producing scientific publications on the potential dangers of the plant. In response, pro-nuclear proponents established the Réel Energi Oplysning (English: Real Energy Information; REO), which was composed primarily of nuclear experts from the Risø laboratory. Their counter-publications affirming the safety of the Barsebäck plant made less of an impact than the OOA's efforts, and the broader Danish public remained opposed. In 1976, approximately 10,000 people marched in a demonstration against the plant, and a second march in 1977 gathered nearly 20,000. In 1979, the OOA collected more than 300,000 signatures in an open letter to the Prime Minister, Anker Jørgensen. [6]

View of the Barseback nuclear power plant towers from the other side of the Oresund in Charlottenlund, Copenhagen. Zealand 2016-08-27 (30060133372).jpg
View of the Barsebäck nuclear power plant towers from the other side of the Øresund in Charlottenlund, Copenhagen.

The Barsebäck plant, the Chernobyl disaster, and the Three Mile Island accident lead to increasing anti-nuclear sentiments in Denmark, spurring energy debates in the Folketing. [6] In August 1978, a march arranged by the OOA to planned reactor sites was attended by approximately 50,000 people. Following the march, option polls stated that just 32% of Danes were in favor of nuclear energy production, while 53% were against it. [13] In March 1985, the Folketing voted to remove nuclear power from the nation's energy planning, effectively banning the generation of electricity from nuclear reactors. [2] [3] [6] The fifteen locations across Denmark which had been reserved for possible nuclear plants were then scraped. [6]

Instead of investing in nuclear power, Denmark converted oil plants to coal and built new coal power plants in order to meet the nations energy demands. As a result, Denmark was the world's second largest importer of coal for several years, importing 11–12 million tons per year. [16] Denmark has increasingly focused on renewable energy sources such as wind energy to reduce the country's dependence on coal power. [1]

21st-century revival

In 2015, two Danish companies related to nuclear energy were established: Seaborg Technologies and Copenhagen Atomics. Both are private companies that work on the development of molten-salt reactors, where the fissile material is mixed into molten salt, having a significantly lower output effect than conventional, commercially available nuclear power reactors. They are smaller in size, and both companies are therefore producing small modular reactors. [17] [18]

The issue of introducing nuclear power in Denmark has been revived since 2019, when the 2019 United Nations Climate Change Conference and the state of the climate showed a need for energy sources which produced fewer greenhouse gasses. In reaction to the popular "Atomkraft? Nej tak" (English: Nuclear Power? No thanks) slogan, the phrase "Atomkraft, ja tak" (English: Nuclear Power? Yes thanks) has gained usage. [19] In March 2024 the Minister of Climate, Energy and Utilities, Lars Aagaard, announced that test reactors may be built in Denmark, provided that they do not produce electricity. [20] The Technical University of Denmark, which now possesses the former facilities of the Risø National Laboratory, reestablished formal research into nuclear power in Denmark in 2024. [21]

Reactors

SiteUnit
No.
TypeStatusCapacityOperating yearsClosedFull decommissioning [note 1] [12]
Risø National Laboratory [22] DR1 AHR Decommissioned2 kW1957–200120032006
DR2 Pool reactor Decommissioned5 MW1958–197520032008
DR3 DIDO Decommissioned10 MW1960–20002003Ongoing

See also

Notes

  1. Year of final approval of decommissioning operations by the supervising agency and release of the decommissioned nuclear site to unrestricted use as a "greenfield" site

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Niels Bohr</span> Danish physicist (1885–1962)

Niels Henrik David Bohr was a Danish theoretical physicist who made foundational contributions to understanding atomic structure and quantum theory, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922. Bohr was also a philosopher and a promoter of scientific research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power</span> Power generated from nuclear reactions

Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions to produce electricity. Nuclear power can be obtained from nuclear fission, nuclear decay and nuclear fusion reactions. Presently, the vast majority of electricity from nuclear power is produced by nuclear fission of uranium and plutonium in nuclear power plants. Nuclear decay processes are used in niche applications such as radioisotope thermoelectric generators in some space probes such as Voyager 2. Reactors producing controlled fusion power have been operated since 1958 but have yet to generate net power and are not expected to be commercially available in the near future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power plant</span> Thermal power station where the heat source is a nuclear reactor

A nuclear power plant (NPP), also known as a nuclear power station (NPS), nuclear generating station (NGS) or atomic power station (APS) is a thermal power station in which the heat source is a nuclear reactor. As is typical of thermal power stations, heat is used to generate steam that drives a steam turbine connected to a generator that produces electricity. As of September 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that there were 410 nuclear power reactors in operation in 32 countries around the world, and 57 nuclear power reactors under construction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atomic Age</span> Period of history since 1945

The Atomic Age, also known as the Atomic Era, is the period of history following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon, The Gadget at the Trinity test in New Mexico on 16 July 1945 during World War II. Although nuclear chain reactions had been hypothesized in 1933 and the first artificial self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction had taken place in December 1942, the Trinity test and the ensuing bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that ended World War II represented the first large-scale use of nuclear technology and ushered in profound changes in sociopolitical thinking and the course of technological development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George de Hevesy</span> Hungarian radiochemist (1885–1966)

George Charles de Hevesy was a Hungarian radiochemist and Nobel Prize in Chemistry laureate, recognized in 1943 for his key role in the development of radioactive tracers to study chemical processes such as in the metabolism of animals. He also co-discovered the element hafnium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Experimental Breeder Reactor I</span> Breeder reactor in Idaho, US

Experimental Breeder Reactor I (EBR-I) is a decommissioned research reactor and U.S. National Historic Landmark located in the desert about 18 miles (29 km) southeast of Arco, Idaho. It was the world's first breeder reactor. At 1:50 p.m. on December 20, 1951, it became one of the world's first electricity-generating nuclear power plants when it produced sufficient electricity to illuminate four 200-watt light bulbs. EBR-I soon generated sufficient electricity to power its building, and the town of Arco and continued to be used for experimental research until it was decommissioned in 1964. The museum is open for visitors from late May until early September.

DIDO was a materials testing nuclear reactor at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell, Oxfordshire in the United Kingdom. It used enriched uranium metal fuel, and heavy water as both neutron moderator and primary coolant. There was also a graphite neutron reflector surrounding the core. In the design phase, DIDO was known as AE334 after its engineering design number.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vallecitos Nuclear Center</span>

The Vallecitos Nuclear Center is a nuclear research facility, and the site of a former GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy electricity-generating nuclear power plant in unincorporated Alameda County, California, United States. The facility is approximately 30 miles (48 km) east of San Francisco, under jurisdiction of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Region IV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shippingport Atomic Power Station</span> Atomic electricity plant in the US

The Shippingport Atomic Power Station was the world's first full-scale atomic electric power plant devoted exclusively to peacetime uses. It was located near the present-day Beaver Valley Nuclear Generating Station on the Ohio River in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, United States, about 25 miles (40 km) from Pittsburgh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power phase-out</span> Discontinuation of usage of nuclear power for energy production

A nuclear power phase-out is the discontinuation of usage of nuclear power for energy production. Often initiated because of concerns about nuclear power, phase-outs usually include shutting down nuclear power plants and looking towards fossil fuels and renewable energy. Three nuclear accidents have influenced the discontinuation of nuclear power: the 1979 Three Mile Island partial nuclear meltdown in the United States, the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the USSR, and the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Sweden

Barsebäck is a boiling water nuclear power plant currently undergoing the process of nuclear decommissioning. The plant is situated in Barsebäck, Kävlinge Municipality, Skåne, Sweden.

The electricity sector in Sweden has three operational nuclear power plants with 6 operational nuclear reactors, which produce about 30% of the country's electricity. The nation's largest power station, Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant, has three reactors producing 3.3 GW and 14% of Sweden's electricity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in the United States</span>

In the United States, nuclear power is provided by 94 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 97 gigawatts (GW), with 63 pressurized water reactors and 31 boiling water reactors. In 2019, they produced a total of 809.41 terawatt-hours of electricity, and by 2024 nuclear energy accounted for 18.6% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2018, nuclear comprised nearly 50 percent of US emission-free energy generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear power in Germany</span>

Nuclear power was used in Germany from the 1960s until it was fully phased out in April 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wind power in Denmark</span>

Denmark was a pioneer in developing commercial wind power during the 1970s, and today a substantial share of the wind turbines around the world are produced by Danish manufacturers such as Vestas—the world's largest wind-turbine manufacturer—along with many component suppliers. Furthermore, Denmark has—as of 2022—the 2nd highest amount in the world of wind power generation capacity installed per capita, behind only neighboring Sweden.

Nuclear power is the fifth-largest source of electricity in India after coal, hydro, solar and wind. As of November 2024, India has 24 nuclear reactors in operation in 8 nuclear power plants, with a total installed capacity of 8,180 MW. Nuclear power produced a total of 48 TWh in 2023, contributing around 3% of total power generation in India. 11 more reactors are under construction with a combined generation capacity of 8,700 MW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smiling Sun</span> Anti-nuclear power logo

The Nuclear Power? No Thanks logo, also known as the Smiling Sun, is an international symbol of the anti-nuclear movement. The logo has been present worldwide since the late 1970s and the 1980s. BBC News reported in 2005 that few symbols had become "as instantly recognizable across the world", and even the nuclear power industry had recognized the logo's "power and success." Over 20 million Smiling Sun badges have been produced in over 60 languages, such as Danish, Korean, Swedish, English, Arabic, Hebrew, Norwegian, and Russian. In recent years the logo has been playing a prominent role once again to raise awareness and funding for anti-nuclear groups, especially in Germany, Austria and Switzerland where opposition is growing to plans for extending the operation of old nuclear reactors and constructing new ones.

This is a history of nuclear power as realized through the first artificial fission of atoms that would lead to the Manhattan Project and, eventually, to using nuclear fission to generate electricity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thorium-based nuclear power</span> Nuclear energy extracted from thorium isotopes

Thorium-based nuclear power generation is fueled primarily by the nuclear fission of the isotope uranium-233 produced from the fertile element thorium. A thorium fuel cycle can offer several potential advantages over a uranium fuel cycle—including the much greater abundance of thorium found on Earth, superior physical and nuclear fuel properties, and reduced nuclear waste production. One advantage of thorium fuel is its low weaponization potential. It is difficult to weaponize the uranium-233 that is bred in the reactor. Plutonium-239 is produced at much lower levels and can be consumed in thorium reactors.

Seaborg Technologies is a private Danish startup. It is developing small molten salt reactors. Founded in 2015 and based in Copenhagen, Denmark, Seaborg emerged as a small team of physicists, chemists, and engineers with educational roots at the Niels Bohr Institute, CERN, ESS and DTU who share a common vision of safe, sustainable and cheap nuclear power.

References

  1. 1 2 "Nuclear Power in Denmark". World Nuclear Association . May 2010. Archived from the original on January 13, 2013. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  2. 1 2 3 "Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities. Denmark" (PDF). Nuclear Legislation in OECD Countries. OECD/NEA: 4. 2007. ISSN   1727-3854.
  3. 1 2 Energy Policies of IEA Countries - Denmark. 2006 Review (PDF). OECD/IEA. 2006. p. 132. ISBN   92-64-10971-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-26. Retrieved 2011-03-15.
  4. "Rekord lav CO2-udledning fra elforbrug i 2015". energinet.dk (in Danish). 1 March 2016. Archived from the original on 20 March 2016.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Nielsen, Henry; Knudsen, Henrik (June 2010). "The troublesome life of peaceful atoms in Denmark". History and Technology. 26 (2): 91–118. doi:10.1080/07341511003750022. ISSN   0734-1512.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Kaijser, Arne; Meyer, Jan-Henrik (2018). ""The World's Worst Located Nuclear Power Plant": Danish and Swedish Cross-Border Perspectives on the Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant". Journal for the History of Environment and Society. 3: 71–105. doi: 10.1484/J.JHES.5.116795 . ISSN   2506-6749.
  7. Bjørn-Hansen, Søren. "Atomkraft, ja tak?". DR (in Danish).
  8. Ebbesen Jensen, Andreas (12 December 2022). "Atomkraft - Ja tak?". Science Illustrated (in Danish). Retrieved 31 August 2024.
  9. Øyen, Morten (5 September 2023). "NY måling: Mere end hver anden vælger er åben for atomkraft i Danmark". Altinget.dk (in Danish).
  10. Henry Nielsen, ed. (1998). Til samfundets tarv - Forskningscenter Risøs historie (in Danish). Forskningscenter Risø. ISBN   87-550-2380-0.
  11. Nationalt program for ansvarling og sikker håndtering af radioaktivt affald (in Danish). Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2020. ISBN   9788770143608.
  12. 1 2 "The six facilities". Danish Decommissioning. 12 November 2024. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
  13. 1 2 3 Buns, Melina Antonia (2017-06-21). "Marching Activists: Transnational Lessons for Danish Anti-Nuclear Protest". Environment & Society Portal. doi:10.5282/rcc/7918 . Retrieved 2024-05-31.
  14. 1 2 "Danmark uden atomkraft" (PDF). Atomkraft Nej Tak (in Danish).
  15. Christiansen, Siegfried (20 April 2013). "The Role of OOA making a Nuclear Free Denmark" (PDF). energiasostenible.org/. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2023. Retrieved 31 May 2024.
  16. Skjerning, Holger (1 October 2015). "Kul". REO (in Danish).
  17. Bjørn-Hansen, Søren (20 August 2015). "Dansk reaktor brænder farligt atomaffald". DR (in Danish). Retrieved 31 August 2024.
  18. Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. 2018.
  19. "Atomgræsrødder sagsøger parti for brug af smilende sol". TV 2 (in Danish). 28 February 2023.
  20. Plechinger, Maz (18 March 2024). "Aagaard: Atom-test er fint i Danmark" . Energi Watch (in Danish).
  21. Vind Jensen, Tore; Koefoed Toft, Simon (17 January 2024). "DTU unites nuclear power research in new center". Technical University of Denmark . Retrieved 31 August 2024.
  22. Knudsen, Henrik (2006). "Risøs Reaktorer: Registrering og dokumentering af bevaringsværdige genstande fra Forskningscenter Risøs reaktorfaciliteter med henblik på at bevare Danmarks nukleare kulturarv" (PDF). Dansk Dekommissionering (in Danish). p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 September 2016.