Ontological turn

Last updated

The ontological turn is an increased interest in ontology within a number of philosophical and academic disciplines during the early 2000s. The ontological turn in anthropology is not concerned with anthropological notions of culture, epistemology, nor world views. [1] Instead, the ontological turn generates interest in being in the world and accepts that different world views are not simply different representations of the same world. More specifically, the ontological turn refers to a change in theoretical orientation according to which differences are understood not in terms of a difference in world views, but a differences in worlds [1] and all of these worlds are of equal validity.

Contents

Definitions

Ontology is the study of reality as constructed in both human and non-human worlds. [2] [3] Conversely, ontology has also been understood as a process of "becoming". [4] Finally, ontology has also been defined as the set of historical circumstances through which individuals comprehend reality. However, this last definition in particular has garnered significant critics due to its similarity to definitions of culture. [5]

Philosophical influence

The field of ontology corresponds to the philosophical study of being. [6] This focus on being draws on Martin Heidegger's insights into the specific nature of what it means to "be" in the world. Heidegger's theorizing on the fundamental nature of being drew on ontological ideals that emerged from the traditions of the Platonic school. [7] In this view, the mind or the experience of being a human, does not refer to a singular entity.[ citation needed ] Instead, the mind refers to a collection of events, life events, or material objects an individual experiences. Thus, ontology relates the experience of being in the world. Further, interest in ontology is associated with a greater understanding of existence, reality, becoming, and how these concepts relate to broad categories of entities. [8] [ citation needed ]

In anthropology

Within the field of anthropology, ontological ideas first began emerging around the 1990s. However, the first influence of ontological understandings within anthropology emerged in the work of Roy Wagner, Marilyn Strathern, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. [9] Following these initial deliberations, the ontological turn took hold of British anthropology. From there, North American anthropologists began considering how ontology might be useful in ethnographic research. The application of ontological frameworks really gained popularity following 2010[ citation needed ] and were brought to national anthropological attention at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association in Chicago, [10] where ontology became the focus of several sessions there. [11] [3] After the conference one of the oldest and prominent [12] anthropology blog, Savage Minds , declared ontology to be "the next big thing" [13] in anthropological theory. This burgeoning interest in ontology spawned a number of articles that highlighted the usefulness of ontological premises in anthropological research. [14] [15] [16] [17]

The concept of ontology and what people mean by ontology is diverse; therefore, tracing the ontological turn in anthropology remains difficult. However, if ontology refers to the study of reality then ontological anthropology incorporates theoretical and methodological elements of anthropology to a study of being or existence. [3] Ethnographies are the most widely utilized method in anthropological research. [18] While, in a theoretical sense, anthropology has contributed greatly to the concept of culture. These two elements in anthropology have broadened philosophical notions of ontology so that ontological anthropology is not simply about the world; rather, it is about the experience of being a human in the world. [3] Moreover, ontological anthropology is explicitly concerned with how humans communicate and interact with a host of non-human actors. [19] For example, as a trained biologist turned anthropologist, Donna Haraway insists on including other beings, both human and non-human, in her accounts of living with pets. [20] Finally, ontological anthropology is not claiming that individuals or communities are living in distinct universes and by crossing into a different setting you are suddenly in a different reality. [1] Instead, ontological anthropologists are claiming that we "should allow difference or alterity to challenge our understanding of the very categories of nature and culture themselves". [21]

Other turns in anthropology

Anthropology as a field has experienced a number of turns in its history, including the linguistic turn, the reflexive turn, the temporal turn, the affective turn, the literary turn, and the post-human turn.[ citation needed ] [22] The ontological turn presents differences in cultural phenomena not as different interpretations of a singular, natural world. Rather, the ontological turn in anthropology suggests that there are alternate realities and other ways of beings that exist in parallel with our own. The proponents of this movement claim that this way of framing cultural difference is the first attempt anthropologists have made in taking the beliefs of their interlocutors "seriously" or "literally". [23] Critics of the ontological turn argue that claims of different worlds tend towards essentialism.

Political ontology is another theoretical development associated with the ontological turn.

Narrow turn towards ontology

The works of French authors Philippe Descola [24] [25] and Bruno Latour, [26] and Brazilian author Eduardo Viveiros de Castro [27] gravitated towards what has been termed "a narrow ontological turn". [3] This narrow ontological turn produced much concern and curiosity within North American anthropology.

Descola's beyond nature

Philippe Descola in his work among the Amazonian Achuar suggested that the category of nature is not a human universal and therefore, should not be considered a line of anthropological inquiry. [24] [28] [29] The domain of "nature", Descola argues has emerged from modern, Western notions that intend to posit "nature" as ontologically real. Instead, Descola claims that "Other civilizations have devised different ways of detecting qualities among existents, resulting in other forms of organizing continuity and discontinuity between humans and nonhumans, of aggregating beings in collectives, of defining who or what is capable of agency and knowledge". [29] Meaning Descola treats animism not as some sort of mistaken belief, but as an extension of social relationality to nonhuman actors. In this sense, Descola utilizes ontology as an elementary analytical tool to explore how worlds are constructed in a manner that is distinct from the way anthropologists generally discuss worldviews. Descola proposes that anthropology can utilize ontological frameworks to best account for how worlds are composed. [29]

Viveiros de Castro's perspectivism

Eduardo Viveiros de Castro utilizes a framework perspectivism in his synthesis of Amazonian ethnographic literature. [30] His discussion of Amazonian understandings takes into account how perspectives of human versus nonhuman are not inherently different. Viveiros de Castro's reflections on perspectivism lead him to conclude that we are dealing with a perspective that is fundamentally different from those which inform Western academic thought. Viveiros de Castro's approach inherently takes an ontological approach that "allows him to see more clearly the ways in which anthropology is founded on a nature/culture divide that posits nature as a sort of universal, unitary, and existent ground and culture as the infinitely variable form of representing nature." [3]

Latour's modes of existence

Bruno Latour argues that researchers should not sort entities into the "social" world and the "natural" world. Latour argues that instead of predetermining what things are deemed as part of society and what things are deemed as part of nature, social scientists should view these categories as complex negotiations between people and their world. [31] This resistance to the division between the social and natural is integral to ontological anthropology.

Reception

Haidy Geismar, one of the critics of ontological anthropology, has claimed that in presenting others not as having different cultures, but in having different worlds, is just a novel form of essentialism. [32] [33] Further, many critics of ontological anthropology have demonstrated that this framework does not take difference as seriously as it claims to. Specifically, Pierre Charbonnier, Gildas Salmon, and Peter Skafish have brought attention to the fact that many ontological anthropologists have drawn similar conclusions to anthropologists not using ontological frameworks, while also utilizing much of the same theoretical bases in their arguments. [34] [1] [35] However, the ontologists have responded that many of these critiques are merely attempts to reproduce the status quo. [36] In response to turn towards ontology a Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory's debate was held on 9 February 2008 in Manchester, on the motion 'Ontology is just another word for culture'. [37] Speaking for the motion were Michael Carrithers (Durham) and Matei Candea (Cambridge), and against Karen Sykes (Manchester) and Martin Holbraad (University College London). The final vote - 19 in favour, 39 against and six abstentions - reflected a general consensus that between culture and ontology, ontology might have something to contribute. [37] Marshall Sahlins in the forward to Beyond Nature and Culture, echos this consensus in his claim that ontology "offers a radical change in the current anthropological trajectory—a paradigm shift if you will—that would overcome the present analytic disarray by what amounts to a planetary table of the ontological elements and the compounds they produce". [25] Sahlins celebrates how anthropology, through this ontological focus, will return to its true focus - the state of being other. [38]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthropology</span> Scientific study of humans, human behavior, and societies

Anthropology is the scientific study of humanity, concerned with human behavior, human biology, cultures, societies, and linguistics, in both the present and past, including past human species. Social anthropology studies patterns of behavior, while cultural anthropology studies cultural meaning, including norms and values. A portmanteau term sociocultural anthropology is commonly used today. Linguistic anthropology studies how language influences social life. Biological or physical anthropology studies the biological development of humans.

In Melanesian and Polynesian cultures, mana is a supernatural force that permeates the universe. Anyone or anything can have mana. They believed it to be a cultivation or possession of energy and power, rather than being a source of power. It is an intentional force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bruno Latour</span> French philosopher, anthropologist and sociologist (1947–2022)

Bruno Latour was a French philosopher, anthropologist and sociologist. He was especially known for his work in the field of science and technology studies (STS). After teaching at the École des Mines de Paris from 1982 to 2006, he became professor at Sciences Po Paris (2006–2017), where he was the scientific director of the Sciences Po Medialab. He retired from several university activities in 2017. He was also a Centennial Professor at the London School of Economics.

Actor–network theory (ANT) is a theoretical and methodological approach to social theory where everything in the social and natural worlds exists in constantly shifting networks of relationships. It posits that nothing exists outside those relationships. All the factors involved in a social situation are on the same level, and thus there are no external social forces beyond what and how the network participants interact at present. Thus, objects, ideas, processes, and any other relevant factors are seen as just as important in creating social situations as humans.

Perspectivism is the epistemological principle that perception of and knowledge of something are always bound to the interpretive perspectives of those observing it. While perspectivism does not regard all perspectives and interpretations as being of equal truth or value, it holds that no one has access to an absolute view of the world cut off from perspective. Instead, all such viewing occurs from some point of view which in turn affects how things are perceived. Rather than attempt to determine truth by correspondence to things outside any perspective, perspectivism thus generally seeks to determine truth by comparing and evaluating perspectives among themselves. Perspectivism may be regarded as an early form of epistemological pluralism, though in some accounts includes treatment of value theory, moral psychology, and realist metaphysics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Achuar</span> Indigenous peoples of the Americas

The Achuar are an Indigenous people of the Americas belonging to the Jivaroan family, alongside the Shuar, Shiwiar, Awajun, and Wampis (Perú). They are settled along the banks of the Pastaza River, Huasaga River, and on the borders between Ecuador and Perú. The word "Achuar" originates from the name of the large palm trees called "Achu" that are abundant in the swamps within their territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pierre Clastres</span> French anthropologist and ethnologist (1934–1977)

Pierre Clastres was a French anthropologist, ethnographer, and ethnologist. He is best known for his contributions to the field of political anthropology, with his fieldwork among the Guayaki in Paraguay and his theory of stateless societies. An anarchist seeking an alternative to the hierarchized Western societies, he mostly researched Indigenous peoples of the Americas in which the power was not considered coercive and chieftains were powerless.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthropology of art</span>

Anthropology of art is a sub-field in social anthropology dedicated to the study of art in different cultural contexts. The anthropology of art focuses on historical, economic and aesthetic dimensions in non-Western art forms, including what is known as 'tribal art'.

Cognitive anthropology is an approach within cultural anthropology and biological anthropology in which scholars seek to explain patterns of shared knowledge, cultural innovation, and transmission over time and space using the methods and theories of the cognitive sciences often through close collaboration with historians, ethnographers, archaeologists, linguists, musicologists, and other specialists engaged in the description and interpretation of cultural forms. Cognitive anthropology is concerned with what people from different groups know and how that implicit knowledge, in the sense of what they think subconsciously, changes the way people perceive and relate to the world around them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hauntology</span> Derridas portmanteau of haunting and ontology

Hauntology is a range of ideas referring to the return or persistence of elements from the social or cultural past, as in the manner of a ghost. The term is a neologism first introduced by French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his 1993 book Specters of Marx. It has since been invoked in fields such as visual arts, philosophy, electronic music, anthropology, politics, fiction, and literary criticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippe Descola</span>

Philippe Descola, FBA is a French anthropologist noted for studies of the Achuar, one of several Jivaroan peoples, and for his contributions to anthropological theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eduardo Viveiros de Castro</span> Brazilian anthropologist (born 1951)

Eduardo Batalha Viveiros de Castro is a Brazilian anthropologist and a professor at the National Museum of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

<i>We Have Never Been Modern</i> 1991 book by Bruno Latour

We Have Never Been Modern is a 1991 book by Bruno Latour, originally published in French as Nous n'avons jamais été modernes: Essai d'anthropologie symétrique.

Social anthropology is the study of patterns of behaviour in human societies and cultures. It is the dominant constituent of anthropology throughout the United Kingdom and much of Europe, where it is distinguished from cultural anthropology. In the United States, social anthropology is commonly subsumed within cultural anthropology or sociocultural anthropology.

This bibliography of anthropology lists some notable publications in the field of anthropology, including its various subfields. It is not comprehensive and continues to be developed. It also includes a number of works that are not by anthropologists but are relevant to the field, such as literary theory, sociology, psychology, and philosophical anthropology.

Eduardo Kohn is Associate Professor of Anthropology at McGill University and winner of the 2014 Gregory Bateson Prize. He is best known for the book, How Forests Think.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tony Lawson</span> British philosopher and economist

Tony Lawson is a British philosopher and economist. He is professor of economics and philosophy in the Faculty of Economics at the University of Cambridge. He is a co-editor of the Cambridge Journal of Economics, a former director of the University of Cambridge Centre for Gender Studies, and co-founder of the Cambridge Realist Workshop and the Cambridge Social Ontology Group. Lawson is noted for his contributions to heterodox economics and to philosophical issues in social theorising, most especially to social ontology.

Epistemic cultures is a concept developed in the nineties by anthropologist Karin Knorr Cetina in her book Epistemic Cultures, how the sciences make knowledge. Opposed to a monist vision of scientific activity, Knorr Cetina defines the concept of epistemic cultures as a diversity of scientific activities according to different scientific fields, not only in methods and tools, but also in types of reasonings, ways to establish evidence, and relationships between theory and empiry. Knorr Cetina's work is seminal in questioning the so-called unity of science.

Nurit Bird-David is a professor of cultural anthropology at the University of Haifa, Israel. She is best known for her study of the Nayaka hunter-gatherers in South India, upon which she based much of her writings on animism, relational epistemology, and indigenous small-scale communities, and which later inspired additional fieldwork and insights on home-making in contemporary industrial societies, and the theoretical concept of scale in anthropology and other social sciences.

Political ontology is an approach within anthropology to understand the process of how practices, entities, and concepts come into being or are enacted. The field takes as its focus 'conflicts involving different assumptions about 'what exists,'" over metaphysical entities, how to understand ecosystems and environment, the nature of animals and plants, and how communities collectively adjudicate what is real. Political ontology emerged as part of the ontological turn, particularly in the works by Mario Blaser, Marisol de la Cadena and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Heywood, Paolo (2012). "Anthropology and What There Is: Reflections on 'Ontology'". The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. University of Cambridge. 30 (1). doi:10.3167/ca.2012.300112. ISSN   0305-7674.
  2. ↑ The Development of Ontology from Suarez to Kant
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kohn, Eduardo (21 October 2015). "Anthropology of Ontologies". Annual Review of Anthropology . 44 (1): 311–327. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127. ISSN   0084-6570.
  4. ↑ Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN   978-0816614011. OCLC   16472336.
  5. ↑ Carrithers, Michael; Candea, Matei; Sykes, Karen; Holbraad, Martin; Venkatesan, Soumhya (2010). "Ontology Is Just Another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester". Critique of Anthropology . 30 (2): 152–200. doi:10.1177/0308275X09364070. ISSN   0308-275X. S2CID   141506449.
  6. ↑ "Ontology | metaphysics". Encyclopedia Britannica . Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  7. ↑ Heidegger, Martin (1971). On the Way to Language (1st Harper & Row paperback ed.). San Francisco: Harper & Row. ISBN   978-0060638597. OCLC   7875767.
  8. ↑ "Definition of Ontology". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  9. ↑ Holbraad, Martin; Pedersen, Morten Axel (2017). The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9781107103887. OCLC   985966648.
  10. ↑ "Ontology as the Major Theme of AAA 2013". Savage Minds. 2013. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  11. ↑ "About AAA - Connect with AAA". www.americananthro.org. American Anthropological Association . Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  12. ↑ Price, David H. (2010). "Blogging Anthropology: Savage Minds, Zero Anthropology, and AAA Blogs". American Anthropologist . 112 (1): 140–142. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01203.x. ISSN   0002-7294. JSTOR   20638767.
  13. ↑ "On Taking Ontological Turns". Savage Minds. 25 January 2014. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  14. ↑ Ries, Nancy (2009). "Potato Ontology: Surviving Postsocialism in Russia". Cultural Anthropology . 24 (2): 181–212. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01129.x.
  15. ↑ Alberti, Benjamin; Fowles, Severin; Holbraad, Martin; Marshall, Yvonne; Witmore, Christopher (2011). ""Worlds Otherwise": Archaeology, Anthropology, and Ontological Difference" (PDF). Current Anthropology . 52 (6): 896–912. doi:10.1086/662027. ISSN   0011-3204. S2CID   67817305.
  16. ↑ Course, Magnus (2010). "Of Words and Fog: Linguistic Relativity and Amerindian Ontology". Anthropological Theory . 10 (3): 247–263. doi:10.1177/1463499610372177. ISSN   1463-4996. S2CID   146430306.
  17. ↑ de la Cadena, Marisol (2010). "Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond "Politics"". Cultural Anthropology . 25 (2): 334–370. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.
  18. ↑ Monaghan, John and Peter Just (2000). Social and Cultural Anthropology: A Very Short Introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.  13. ISBN   9780192853462.
  19. ↑ Kohn, Eduardo (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley. ISBN   9780520956865. OCLC   857079372.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  20. ↑ Haraway, Donna Jeanne (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN   9780816654031. OCLC   191733419.
  21. ↑ Heywood, Paolo (19 May 2017). "The Ontological Turn". Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology . doi: 10.29164/17ontology .
  22. ↑ Bialecki, Jon (2016-06-20). "Turn, Turn, Turn". www.publicbooks.org/. Public Books.
  23. ↑ Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2011). "Zeno and the Art of Anthropology: Of Lies, Beliefs, Paradoxes, and Other Truths". Common Knowledge . Duke University Press. 17 (1): 128–145. doi:10.1215/0961754X-2010-045. ISSN   0961-754X. S2CID   145307160.
  24. 1 2 Descola, Philippe (1994). In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521411035. OCLC   27974392.
  25. 1 2 Descola, Philippe; Lloyd, Janet (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226145006. OCLC   855534400.
  26. ↑ Latour, Bruno (2013). An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN   9780674724990. OCLC   826456727.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  27. ↑ Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo; Skafish, Peter (2014). Cannibal Metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN   9781937561970. OCLC   939262444.
  28. ↑ Descola, Philippe; Pálsson, Gísli (1996). Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge. ISBN   9780203451069. OCLC   1081429894.
  29. 1 2 3 Descola, Philippe (2014). "Modes of Being and Forms of Predication". HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory . 4 (1): 271–280. doi:10.14318/hau4.1.012. ISSN   2575-1433. S2CID   145504956.
  30. ↑ Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (1998). "Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism". The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute . 4 (3): 469–488. doi:10.2307/3034157. JSTOR   3034157.
  31. ↑ Latour, Bruno; Porter, Catherine (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN   978-0674948389. OCLC   27894925.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  32. ↑ Geismar, Haidy (2009). "On Multiple Ontologies and the Temporality of Things". Material World. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
  33. ↑ "Turn, Turn, Turn". Public Books . 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  34. ↑ Charbonnier, Pierre; Salmon, Gildas; Skafish, Peter (2017). Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology After Anthropology. London. ISBN   9781783488575. OCLC   929123082.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  35. ↑ Abramson, Allen; Holbraad, Martin. Framing Cosmologies: The Anthropology of Worlds. Manchester. ISBN   9781847799098. OCLC   953456922.
  36. ↑ Pedersen, Morten Axel (2012). Common Nonsense: A review of certain recent reviews of the 'ontological turn'. OCLC   842767912.
  37. 1 2 Rollason, William (June 2008). "Ontology – just another word for culture?". Anthropology Today . 24 (3): 28–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2008.00593.x. ISSN   0268-540X.
  38. ↑ Bessire, Lucas; Bond, David (August 2014). "Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique". American Ethnologist . 41 (3): 440–456. doi:10.1111/amet.12083.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.