Opinion polling for the 2006 Canadian federal election

Last updated

Compiled polling/vote chart indicating levels of party support up to the 39th Canadian federal election. From the end of 2005, the shift in support from the Liberals to the Conservatives is evident. Opinion polling for the 2006 Canadian federal election.svg
Compiled polling/vote chart indicating levels of party support up to the 39th Canadian federal election. From the end of 2005, the shift in support from the Liberals to the Conservatives is evident.

Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election of 2006 (held on 23 January 2006) showed a long period of variable support for the governing Liberal Party of Canada and opposition Conservative Party of Canada. Prior to and throughout much of the campaign, the Liberals held a small lead over the Conservatives; as of early January 2006, the Conservatives had taken the lead. This was confirmed on election day when the Conservatives won a plurality of votes and seats, being empowered to form a minority government in the 39th Canadian parliament.

Contents

Summary

In the leadup to the 2006 federal election, several opinion polls were commissioned to gauge the voting intentions of Canadians, particularly in the wake of Jean Brault's testimony at the Gomery Commission on 7 April 2005. The results of these polls showed a dip in support for the Liberals, which encouraged the Conservatives to seek an early election by tabling a non-confidence motion. However, Liberal support recovered following an agreement with the New Democratic Party (NDP) to support some changes to the federal budget and a number of incidents involving Conservative Member of Parliament (MP) Gurmant Grewal that hurt the Conservatives. Consistently since the Brault testimony, the polls have indicated that an election would result in an increase in the number of seats for the Bloc Québécois and NDP, and cyclical gains and losses for the Conservatives inversely to the Liberals.

In November 2005, the first report by Justice John Gomery was released to the public; subsequently, the poll numbers for the Liberals again dropped. Just days later, a new poll (Strategic Counsel: 6 November 2005) showed the Liberals were already bouncing back. On 28 November 2005, the minority Liberal government succumbed to another Conservative non-confidence motion supported by the three opposition parties and the writs for an election were dropped. The Conservatives achieved near parity but, early in the campaign, again fell back behind the Liberals. Renewed accusations of corruption and impropriety at the end of 2005 – amid Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) criminal probes concerning possible government leaks regarding income trust tax changes and advertising sponsorships – led to an upswing of Conservative support again and gave them a lead over the Liberals, portending a possible change in government.

Polling figures for the NDP increased slightly, while Bloc figures experienced a slight dip; figures for the Green Party did not change appreciably throughout the campaign.

Poll results

The dates listed are normally the date the survey was concluded. Most news and political affairs sources use the convention of using the last date that the poll was conducted in order to establish the inclusion/exclusion of current events.

Polling firmLast date
of polling
Link LPC CPC NDP BQ GPC Margin
of error
Sample
size
Polling methodLead
Election 23 January 200630.236.317.510.54.56.1
Strategic Counsel 22 January 2006 PDF 273719116± 2%2,50010
Nanos Research 22 January 2006 PDF 30.136.417.410.65.6± 3.1%1,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)6.3
Ipsos-Reid 22 January 2006 HTML 273819124± 1.1%9,64811
Nanos Research21 January 2006 PDF 28.137.017.711.36.0± 3.1%1,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)8.9
Strategic Counsel21 January PDF 273718116± 2.2%2,00010
Nanos Research20 January PDF 29.436.217.311.06.1± 3.1%1,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)6.8
EKOS 20 JanuaryPDF26.937.119.511.54.610.2
EKOS20 January PDF24.438.419.811.95.414
Ipsos-Reid 19 January PDF 26381911512
EKOS19 JanuaryPDF27.037.119.711.24.510.1
Strategic Counsel19 JanuaryPDF28381711710
Nanos Research19 January PDF 29.035.518.811.15.6± 2.9%1,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)6.5
EKOS19 January [3] PDF27.337.420.810.13.99.9
Strategic Counsel18 JanuaryPDF2837161279
Nanos Research18 JanuaryPDF30.737.016.610.74.96.3
EKOS18 January [3] PDF29.335.118.012.64.45.8
Leger Marketing 17 JanuaryPDF293817119
Strategic Counsel17 JanuaryPDF25411712516
Nanos Research17 JanuaryPDF31.536.917.610.04.05.4
EKOS17 JanuaryPDF27.236.919.611.04.89.7
Strategic Counsel16 JanuaryPDF24421712518
Nanos Research16 JanuaryPDF3037181047
EKOS16 January [3] PDF29.635.819.411.63.46.2
Decima Research 15 January PDF 27371811± 3.1%1017telephone10
Ipsos-Reid15 January PDF 26381912512
Strategic Counsel15 JanuaryPDF27401611613
Nanos Research15 JanuaryPDF2937181158
EKOS15 January PDF 27.238.618.610.64.4± 3.2968Telephone11.4
Nanos Research14 JanuaryPDF3038171068
Strategic Counsel14 JanuaryPDF27401611613
Nanos Research13 JanuaryPDF2938161179
Strategic Counsel12 JanuaryPDF28381611610
Ipsos-Reid12 January HTML 293718105
Nanos Research12 January PDF 314014106± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)9
EKOS12 January PDF 28.337.618.111.63.7± 2.02,045
EKOS12 January [3] PDF 27.438.118.111.54.5
Strategic Counsel11 January PDF 273916126
Nanos Research11 January PDF 293816125± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)9
EKOS11 January [3] PDF 28.836.317.913.32.8
Strategic Counsel10 January PDF 283916121,500
Nanos Research10 January PDF 303916124± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)9
EKOS10 January [3] PDF 29.937.117.611.63.2
Strategic Counsel9 January PDF 283816126
Nanos Research9 January PDF 313517135± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)4
EKOS9 January PDF 26.839.116.212.65.4
Ipsos-Reid8 January PDF 263718135
Decima Research8 January PDF 273620115
Nanos Research8 January PDF 313417116± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)3
Strategic Counsel8 January PDF 293715136± 2.51,5008
Nanos Research7 January PDF 323417116± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)2
Nanos Research6 January PDF 323517106± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)3
Ipsos-Reid5 January PDF 313518105± 2.22,0044
EKOS5 January PDF 30.836.017.510.64.7± 2.21,968
Strategic Counsel5 January PDF 313317136
Nanos Research5 January PDF 333417115± 3.21,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)1
Leger Marketing4 January PDF 323416115
Strategic Counsel4 January PDF 323217136
Nanos Research4 January PDF 333515125± 3.21,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)2
EKOS4 January PDF 30.436.217.910.44.7± 2.71,386
Strategic Counsel3 January HTML 323217136± 2.51,5000
Nanos Research3 January PDF 333615134± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)3
Strategic Counsel31 December 2005 PDF 3331171462
Nanos Research30 December PDF 353514134± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)0
Ipsos-Reid30 December PDF 323318125± 3.11,000Telephone1
Decima Research30 December PDF 32301814
Nanos Research29 December PDF 353414135± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)1
Nanos Research28 December PDF 383214134± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)6
Nanos Research23 December PDF 383115125± 3.11,200 (1/3)Telephone (rolling)7
Ipsos-Reid22 December PDF 333216135± 3.11,000Telephone1
Strategic Counsel22 December PDF 362917135
Nanos Research22 December PDF 392915125
Environics 21 December HTML 353017125± 3.11,0105
Strategic Counsel21 DecemberPDF333018145
Leger Marketing21 DecemberPDF362817125
Nanos Research21 December PDF 372915126
Strategic Counsel20 DecemberPDF343016155
Nanos Research20 December PDF 373114136
Strategic Counsel19 DecemberPDF332917156
Nanos Research19 December PDF 372916135
Strategic Counsel18 DecemberPDF342919135
Pollara 19 DecemberHTML37341710
Nanos Research18 December PDF 382916124
Nanos Research17 December PDF 383015134
Nanos Research16 December PDF 393114125
Strategic Counsel15 DecemberPDF343018135
Nanos Research15 December PDF 393312125
Strategic Counsel14 DecemberPDF343017145
Nanos Research14 December PDF 393212125
Leger Marketing13 DecemberPDF352917126
Strategic Counsel13 DecemberPDF342917146
Nanos Research13 December PDF 383114125
Strategic Counsel12 DecemberPDF3331171362
Nanos Research12 December PDF 383013145
Ipsos-Reid11 December PDF 362717145
Pollara11 DecemberHTML38301512
Strategic Counsel11 DecemberPDF343016146
Nanos Research11 December PDF 393114134
Strategic Counsel10 DecemberPDF353015146
Nanos Research10 December PDF 393214134
Decima Research9 DecemberPDF362720134
Nanos Research9 December PDF 393015114
Strategic Counsel8 DecemberPDF362816146
Nanos Research8 December PDF 412618114
Ipsos-Reid8 December PDF 343015145
Leger Marketing7 December PDF 392716125
Strategic Counsel7 December PDF 363015145
Nanos Research7 DecemberPDF402618114
Strategic Counsel6 December PDF 352916136
Nanos Research6 December PDF 402817114
Decima Research5 December34262014
Strategic Counsel5 DecemberPDF352916146
Nanos Research5 December PDF 383016125
Strategic Counsel4 DecemberPDF352916146
Nanos Research4 December PDF 373016135
Strategic Counsel3 December HTML 343016146
Nanos Research3 December PDF 382915145
Nanos Research2 December PDF 363114145
Ipsos-Reid1 December PDF 333117145
Strategic Counsel1 December HTML 353016146
Nanos Research1 December PDF 372915145
EKOS1 DecemberPDF34.127.418.414.06.0
Strategic Counsel30 November PDF 353017145
Ipsos-Reid28 NovemberHTML313118155
Decima Research28 November36281912
Strategic Counsel27 November PDF 352917145
Pollara27 NovemberHTML36311614
Environics25 November353020141
EKOS24 NovemberPDF38.729.416.910.63.0
Ipsos-Reid24 NovemberHTML343016155
Ipsos-Reid15 November362716136
Decima Research14 NovemberPDF33262213
Pollara13 November362820
Nanos Research13 November PDF 342820144
Ipsos-Reid10 November PDF 342819144
EKOS9 NovemberPDF33.027.920.913.14.9
Leger Marketing8 November PDF 342618117
Decima Research7 NovemberPDF33302014
Strategic Counsel6 November352816138
Strategic Counsel3 November283120137
Ipsos-Reid2 November31301913
Nanos Research27 OctoberPDF402815124
Ipsos-Reid27 October382618115
Pollara17 October383017
Decima Research17 OctoberPDF35291713
Environics16 October38272010
Strategic Counsel13 OctoberPDF38251514
Pollara2 October36301911
Ipsos-Reid29 September PDF 372717144
Decima Research26 SeptemberPDF36291713
Praxicus 23 September332920
Strategic Counsel13 September352817137
Leger Marketing11 SeptemberPDF402415135
Ipsos-Reid22 August362817116
Strategic Counsel15 August362817
Nanos Research8 AugustPDF39251913
Environics28 JulyHTML34312011
Decima Research25 JulyPDF39241914
Pollara18 July38271513
Strategic Counsel16 July352619137
Pollara28 June36291811
Ipsos-Reid28 June352718136
Decima Research20 JunePDF37252013
Ipsos-Reid20 June342916126
Strategic Counsel11 June342619139
Pollara6 June38271913
Decima Research5 June PDF 37232113
Decima Research22 May PDF 36272113
Leger Marketing22 May 2005 PDF 382717124± 2.6%1,50911
Ipsos-Reid20 May 200534281766
Strategic Counsel18 May 20053330191263
COMPAS 17 May 2005 PDF 293817139
EKOS17 May 2005 PDF 34.728.318.412.65.66.4
Environics17 May 2005333122102
Decima Research15 May 2005 PDF 323119141
Ipsos-Reid14 May 20052731191364
Strategic Counsel10 May 20052731201474
Decima Research8 May 2005 PDF 372818129
Ipsos-Reid7 May 20053231161251
Nanos Research5 May 200536.129.517.912.24.36.6
Pollara4 May 2005313617155
Decima Research2 May 2005 PDF 322920153
Ipsos-Reid28 April 2005 PDF 303317125±3.1%1000Telephone3
EKOS28 April 2005 PDF 32.530.519.012.05.52
GPC P.A.28 April 200533301313103
Strategic Counsel28 April 200530281816102
Ipsos-Reid24 April 2005 PDF 313418115±3.1%1000Telephone3
Decima Research24 April 2005 PDF 273221155
Ipsos-Reid21 April 2005 PDF 303518125±3.1%1000Telephone5
Pollara21 April 2005313518124
Nanos Research18 April 200531.637.914.911.93.86.3
Decima Research17 April 2005 PDF 283518147
Ipsos-Reid14 April 2005 PDF 273615107±3.1%1000Telephone9
COMPAS14 April 20053034181514
Environics14 April 20052733241126
Environics12 April 20053630191146
Leger Marketing11 April 2005 PDF 31341813± 2.5%1,504Telephone3
Ipsos-Reid10 April 2005 PDF 273019127±3.1%1000Telephone3
Decima Research10 April 2005 PDF 313219141
EKOS9 April 2005 PDF 25.036.220.512.65.011.2
Ipsos-Reid7 April 2005 PDF 343015107±3.1%1000Telephone4
Last election 28 June 2004HTML36.729.615.712.44.37.1
  1. ^ Strategic Counsel polls from 27 November onwards are multi-day polls. Each new poll removes approximately 1/3 of the data that is the oldest, and replaces it with new data from that day.
  2. ^ Nanos polls from December onwards are 3-day polls. Each new poll removes the 1/3 of the data that is the oldest, and replaces it with new data from that day.
  3. ^ Various EKOS polls contain results from a single night of polling only. They have fewer respondents than most other polls and, thus, EKOS notes that they are not as credible; however, they are intended to provide a general indication of daily polling trends.
  4. ^ This Compas poll was taken over the course of a single day.
  5. ^ Polling for this data mostly occurred before Jean Brault's Gomery Inquiry testimony was released.

NB: The margin of error in these surveys is typically between 2.5 and 3.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. See the links for actual error values associated with particular surveys. Because these figures are national percentages, they may not reflect the expected number of seats won by each party. Indeed, the sample size in many polls is not sufficient to give a statistically accurate prediction in individual ridings, and hence the expected number of seats.

All polling companies rely on cooperation from individuals contacted over the phone. The major companies claim a typical response rate is between 20 and 35 percent. [1]

Seat predictions

Several websites, polling firms and notable Canadians devised various method of projecting the final election result. Included below are those cited in Andrew Coyne's blog. [2]

ProjectorConservativeLiberalNDPBQOther
Final Results HTML12410329511
ElectionPrediction.org11810429561
democraticSPACE.com1289429561
UBC Election Stock market 1279333541
jord.ca1357238621
Loblaw Election Pool1368926570
Laurier University 1407833561
Andrew Coyne 1408131542
TrendLines Federal & Provincial Riding Projections1407535571
ElectionPolls1417930581
PinnacleSports.com1467431570
Ipsos-Reid 148–15262–6634–3856–60-

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal Party of Canada</span> Canadian political party

The Liberal Party of Canada is a federal political party in Canada. The party espouses the principles of liberalism, and generally sits at the centre to centre-left of the Canadian political spectrum, with their rival, the Conservative Party, positioned to their right and the New Democratic Party, who at times aligned itself with the Liberals during minority governments, positioned to their left. The party is described as "big tent", practising "brokerage politics", attracting support from a broad spectrum of voters. The Liberal Party is the longest-serving and oldest active federal political party in the country, and has dominated federal politics of Canada for much of its history, holding power for almost 70 years of the 20th century. As a result, it has sometimes been referred to as Canada's "natural governing party".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jack Layton</span> Canadian politician (1950–2011)

John Gilbert Layton was a Canadian academic and politician who served as the leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) from 2003 to 2011 and leader of the Official Opposition in 2011. He previously sat on Toronto City Council, occasionally holding the title of acting mayor or deputy mayor of Toronto during his tenure as city councillor. Layton was the member of Parliament (MP) for Toronto—Danforth from 2004 until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000 Canadian federal election</span> 37th Canadian federal election

The 2000 Canadian federal election was held on November 27, 2000, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 37th Parliament of Canada. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's Liberal Party won a third majority government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1997 Canadian federal election</span> 36th Canadian federal election

The 1997 Canadian federal election was held on June 2, 1997, to elect members to the House of Commons of the 36th Parliament of Canada. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's Liberal Party won a second majority government. The Reform Party replaced the Bloc Québécois as the Official Opposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1993 Canadian federal election</span> 35th federal election in Canada

The 1993 Canadian federal election was held on October 25, 1993, to elect members to the House of Commons of the 35th Parliament of Canada. Considered to be a major political realignment, it was one of the most eventful elections in Canada's history. Two new regionalist parties emerged and the election marked the worst defeat for a governing party at the federal level. In a landslide, the Liberal Party, led by Jean Chrétien, won a majority government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Canadian federal election</span> 38th Canadian federal election

The 2004 Canadian federal election was held on June 28, 2004, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 38th Parliament of Canada. The Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin lost its majority but was able to continue in office as a minority government after the election. This was the first election contested by the newly amalgamated Conservative Party of Canada, after it was formed by the two right-of-centre parties, the Progressive Conservative Party and the Canadian Alliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1984 Canadian federal election</span> 33rd Canadian federal election

The 1984 Canadian federal election was held on September 4, 1984, to elect members to the House of Commons of the 33rd Parliament of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2007 Ontario general election</span> Canadian provincial election, 2007

The 2007 Ontario general election was held on October 10, 2007, to elect members (MPPs) of the 39th Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The Liberals under Premier Dalton McGuinty won the election with a majority government, winning 71 out of a possible 107 seats with 42.2% of the popular vote. The election saw the third-lowest voter turnout in Ontario provincial elections, setting a then record for the lowest voter turnout with 52.8% of people who were eligible voted. This broke the previous record of 54.7% in the 1923 election, but would end up being surpassed in the 2011 and 2022 elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal minority governments in Canada</span> Canadian political history

During the history of Canadian politics, thirteen minority governments have been elected at the federal level. There have also been two minority governments resulting from governments being replaced between elections, for a total of fifteen federal minority governments in thirteen separate minority parliaments. There have been historical cases where the governing party had fewer than half of the seats but had the support of independents who called themselves members of the party; these cases are not included, as there was never any serious chance of the government falling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Canadian federal election</span> 39th Canadian federal election

The 2006 Canadian federal election was held on January 23, 2006, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 39th Parliament of Canada.

The 2005 Canadian federal budget was the budget of the Government of Canada for the 2005–2006 fiscal year. It was presented on February 23, 2005, by Finance Minister Ralph Goodale. It was the first Canadian federal budget presented by a minority government since the budget of the Joe Clark Progressive Conservative government in 1979, which was defeated by the opposition parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 New Brunswick general election</span>

The 2006 New Brunswick general election was held on September 18, 2006, to elect 55 members to the 56th New Brunswick Legislative Assembly, the governing house of the province of New Brunswick, Canada.

This article provides the timeline of the 2006 Canadian federal election, which was called on November 29, 2005 when the Governor General dissolved parliament following the government's defeat in a motion of no confidence. The election was held on January 23, 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Results of the 2006 Canadian federal election</span> Results of the 39th Canadian federal election

The 39th Canadian federal election was held on January 23, 2006.

In the run-up to the general election of 2010, several polling organisations carried out opinion polling in regards to voting intention in Great Britain. Results of such polls are displayed below.

The New Democratic Party is a federal political party in Canada. Widely described as social democratic, the party occupies the left, to centre-left on the political spectrum, sitting to the left of the Liberal Party. The party was founded in 1961 by the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC).

This article covers the history of the New Democratic Party of Canada.

By-elections to the 38th Canadian Parliament were held to fill vacancies in the House of Commons of Canada between the 2004 federal election and the 2006 federal election. The Liberal Party of Canada led a minority government for the entirety of the 38th Canadian Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Manitoba general election</span>

The 2016 Manitoba general election was held on April 19, 2016 to elect members to the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba, Canada. The New Democratic Party of Manitoba, led by Greg Selinger, were defeated by the Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba led by Brian Pallister, ending nearly 17 years of NDP government. The Tories won 40 seats, one of the largest majority governments in Manitoba history, the other one was in 1915 when Liberals also won 40 seats.

The 2019 Canadian federal election was held on October 21, 2019, to elect members of the House of Commons to the 43rd Canadian Parliament. The Liberal Party of Canada, having previously held a majority of the seats in the House, was returned with a minority of the seats, while the Conservative Party of Canada gained fewer seats than expected and the Bloc Québécois saw its standing revived in Quebec.

References

  1. "CBC – Canada Votes 2006 – Voter Toolkit". 10 December 2005. Archived from the original on 10 December 2005. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  2. "andrewcoyne.com: Last call". 19 February 2006. Archived from the original on 19 February 2006. Retrieved 20 April 2021.