Peer Community in

Last updated
Peer Community In
Logo PCI.jpg
Type of site
Science
URL peercommunityin.org
CommercialNo

Peer Community in (PCI) is a non-profit scientific organization that offers an editorial process of open science by creating specific communities of researchers reviewing and recommending preprints in their field. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Since 2021, a new journal, Peer Community Journal , publishes recommended preprints. [7]

Contents

General principles

Logo of bioRxiv, an open archive for biology preprints BioRxiv logo.png
Logo of bioRxiv, an open archive for biology preprints

PCI provides scientific validation of manuscripts, accessible in open archives in accordance with the principle of open access (free access for the author and for the reader), with the recommendations of the experts also being accessible to the reader and citable because they are signed and provided with a digital object identifier. [3] [8] As a whole, it is presented like a classic scientific journal, but one that provides more transparent and advanced services, in addition to being free. [9] [10]

PCI does not actually publish the scientific articles, so it is not affected by the Ingelfinger rule which regulates the duplication of publications. The same manuscript can therefore be recommended by PCIs from several disciplines, which is useful for promoting interdisciplinary work. The same manuscript can also be recommended by a PCI in the form of a preprint, then published by a classic journal. [11]

Compatibility with traditional publishing

Many scientific journals accept manuscripts previously distributed via preprints. [12] A manuscript recommended by a PCI therefore remains free for later publication in most "classic" scientific journals.

Authors who have submitted their manuscript to a PCI and have benefited from an improvement-recommendation cycle generally then choose to submit it for publication in a classic journal. Some journals favor this choice, integrating PCI reviews into their own editorial process if they consider them adequate. [13] [14]

PCI communities

There are different PCI communities for different sub-fields, each community with its own managing board, associate editors and external reviewers.

Organization

Peer Community in was founded in 2016 as a non-profit organization under the French law. Founding members Denis Bourguet, Benoit Facon and Thomas Guillemaud are researchers at the Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRAE). The organization is an «association loi de 1901» [19] administratively based in Nice. [1]

The Association coordinates the creation and activity of the various disciplinary PCI communities. Each community is funded by its own subsidies, which are very modest, as the editorial model does not provide any financial resources for e.g. author's publication costs, readers' consultation costs or subscriptions to their institutional libraries. [20]

Each disciplinary PCI is made up of a management board comprising around ten recognized experts in the field, several tens or hundreds of associate editors (“recommenders”), and involves external reviewers.

Recognition

A number of higher education institutions are accepting the students' preprints as equivalent to a publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, [14] when those preprints are available at an open archive (such as arXiv, bioRxiv, etc.) and are recommended by a PCI.

The PCI initiative is supported by numerous institutions that value open science and bibliodiversity in their practices, such as the CNRS [21] or the INEE. [22] These institutions commit to:

More than 30 academic journals have claimed that they are happy to consider preprints recommended by PCI.

The three co-founders of PCI, along with Marjolaine Hamelin who later joined the team, were awarded the LIBER Award for Library Innovation in 2020 for the development of PCI, a free public system for peer-reviewing and highlighting preprints. [23] [24]

Media Coverage

PCI was initially mostly discussed in the French media. [25] [26] It was discussed in Le Monde as an example of an open-science initiative in scientific publishing. [25] PCI was also described in Sciences et Avenir as an alternative publishing platform that could be a more efficient use of resources for universities and researchers. [26] As of mid-2020, PCI has attracted much more attention[ according to whom? ] worldwide. [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific journal</span> Periodical journal publishing scientific research

In academic publishing, a scientific journal is a periodical publication intended to further the progress of science, usually by sharing findings from research with readers. They are normally specialized based on discipline, with authors picking which one they send their manuscripts to.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Preprint</span> Academic paper prior to journal publication

In academic publishing, a preprint is a version of a scholarly or scientific paper that precedes formal peer review and publication in a peer-reviewed scholarly or scientific journal. The preprint may be available, often as a non-typeset version available free, before or after a paper is published in a journal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic publishing</span> Subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship

Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or thesis. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "grey literature". Most scientific and scholarly journals, and many academic and scholarly books, though not all, are based on some form of peer review or editorial refereeing to qualify texts for publication. Peer review quality and selectivity standards vary greatly from journal to journal, publisher to publisher, and field to field.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic journal</span> Peer-reviewed scholarly periodical

An academic journal or scholarly journal is a periodical publication in which scholarship relating to a particular academic discipline is published. Academic journals serve as permanent and transparent forums for the presentation, scrutiny, and discussion of research. They nearly universally require peer review or other scrutiny from contemporaries competent and established in their respective fields. Content typically takes the form of articles presenting original research, review articles, or book reviews. The purpose of an academic journal, according to Henry Oldenburg, is to give researchers a venue to "impart their knowledge to one another, and contribute what they can to the Grand design of improving natural knowledge, and perfecting all Philosophical Arts, and Sciences."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Postprint</span> Electronic version of a scholarly manuscript after peer review

A postprint is a digital draft of a research journal article after it has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication, but before it has been typeset and formatted by the journal.

<i>Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics</i> Academic journal

The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics is an annual scientific journal published by Annual Reviews. The journal was established in 1970 as the Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics and changed its name beginning in 2003. It publishes invited review articles on topics considered to be timely and important in the fields of ecology, evolutionary biology, and systematics. As of 2023, Journal Citation Reports gave the journal a 2022 impact factor of 11.8, ranking it third of 169 journals in the "Ecology" category and third of 52 journals in "Evolutionary Biology".

Nature Precedings was an open access electronic preprint repository of scholarly work in the fields of biomedical sciences, chemistry, and earth sciences. It ceased accepting new submissions as of April 3, 2012.

<i>Ecography</i> Academic journal

Ecography is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Wiley on behalf of the Nordic Society Oikos covering the field of spatial ecology. It has been published since 1978, the first 14 volumes under the name Holarctic Ecology.

Open peer review is the various possible modifications of the traditional scholarly peer review process. The three most common modifications to which the term is applied are:

  1. Open identities: Authors and reviewers are aware of each other's identity.
  2. Open reports: Review reports are published alongside the relevant article.
  3. Open participation: The wider community are able to contribute to the review process.

Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP) is a predatory academic publisher of open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies that are considered to be of questionable quality. As of December 2014, it offered 244 English-language open-access journals in the areas of science, technology, business, economy, and medicine.

In scientific publishing, the 1969 Ingelfinger rule originally stipulated that The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) would not publish findings that had been published elsewhere, in other media or in other journals. The rule was subsequently adopted by several other scientific journals, and has shaped scientific publishing ever since. Historically it has also helped to ensure that the journal's content is fresh and does not duplicate content previously reported elsewhere, and seeks to protect the scientific embargo system.

Scholarly peer review or academic peer review is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed by experts in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review.

<i>eLife</i> Open-access scientific journal

eLife is a not-for-profit, peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journal for the biomedical and life sciences. It was established at the end of 2012 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Max Planck Society, and Wellcome Trust, following a workshop held in 2010 at the Janelia Farm Research Campus. Together, these organizations provided the initial funding to support the business and publishing operations. In 2016, the organizations committed US$26 million to continue publication of the journal.

<i>PeerJ</i> Academic journal

PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific mega journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. It is published by a company of the same name that was co-founded by CEO Jason Hoyt and publisher Peter Binfield, with initial financial backing of US$950,000 from O'Reilly Media's O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures, and later funding from Sage Publishing.

Peerage of Science was a scientific peer review service aimed at improving "the current peer review system and make the peer review process more scientific, fair and transparent". The company was founded in 2011 by the scientists Janne Kotiaho, Mikko Mönkkönen, and Janne-Tuomas Seppänen in Jyväskylä, Finland. Initially it focused on the areas of "ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation biology", but within 2 years it expanded to other areas of science.

ScienceOpen is a web-based platform, that hosts open access journals. It is freely accessible for readers, authors and publishers, and it generates its revenues via promotional services for publishers and authors' institutions. The organization is based in Berlin and has a technical office in Boston. It is a member of CrossRef, ORCID, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, STM Association and the Directory of Open Access Journals. The company was designated as one of “10 to Watch” by research advisory firm Outsell in its report “Open Access 2015: Market Size, Share, Forecast, and Trends.”

bioRxiv Preprint service

bioRxiv is an open access preprint repository for the biological sciences co-founded by John Inglis and Richard Sever in November 2013. It is hosted by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL).

Rapid Reviews: Infectious Diseases, also known as RR\ID and formerly known as Rapid Reviews: COVID-19, or RR:C19, is an open access interdisciplinary medical journal published by the MIT Press. It publishes peer reviews and editorials of timely, publicly-posted preprints relevant to all aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The journal was established in June 2020 with Stefano Bertozzi as editor-in-chief.

References

  1. 1 2 "Peer Community In".
  2. "Pci-Open Access at Oxford".
  3. 1 2 Alizon, Samuel (2018-05-01). "Inexpensive Research in the Golden Open-Access Era". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 33 (5): 301–303. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.005. ISSN   0169-5347. PMID   29625710.
  4. Hettne, Kristina; Aardening, Ron; Van Gorp, Dirk; Hukkelhoven, Chantal; Loorbach, Nicole; Sondervan, Jeroen; Van Wesenbeeck, Astrid (2021). "A Practical Guide to Preprints: Accelerating Scholarly Communication". doi:10.5281/zenodo.5600535 . Retrieved 2022-01-05.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. "Peer Community in Ecology" . Retrieved 2022-01-05.
  6. "Preprint review services: Disrupting the scholarly communication landscape?". 2023.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. "Home | Peer Community Journal". peercommunityjournal.org (in French). Retrieved 2022-01-20.
  8. "ULiège supports "Peer Community In"". www.news.uliege.be. Retrieved 2021-01-23.
  9. Sarabipour, Sarvenaz; Debat, Humberto J.; Emmott, Edward; Burgess, Steven J.; Schwessinger, Benjamin; Hensel, Zach (2019-02-21). "On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective". PLOS Biology. 17 (2): e3000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   6400415 . PMID   30789895.
  10. Staines, Heather (2019-09-18). "Making Peer Review More Open and Transparent". Commonplace. doi: 10.21428/6ffd8432.d0730ab8 .
  11. "Using connectivity to identify climatic drivers of local adaptation". bioRxiv   10.1101/145169 .
  12. "SHERPA/RoMEO - Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving".
  13. "FAQ: Do scientific journals accept the submission of articles already reviewed and recommended by PCI?".
  14. 1 2 "Peer Community in networks".
  15. "Blog open-science-indonesia". open-science-indonesia. 18 December 2020. Retrieved 2020-12-18.
  16. "Peer Community in Archaeology, una peer review migliore per tutti". Stefano Costa - There's more than just potsherds out there. Retrieved 2021-01-06.
  17. Clause, Julia (2018-02-02). "La SFE² soutient les modes de publications innovants tels que Peer Community in Ecology (PCI Ecology)". sfecologie.org (in French). Retrieved 2019-09-15.
  18. tgabaldon. "Peer Community in Evolutionary Biology (PCI Evol Biol) launched". SESBE (in European Spanish). Retrieved 2019-09-15.
  19. "Interview Grand Labo". 26 February 2020.
  20. "Peer Community In - PCI economic model". 29 May 2019.
  21. CNRS official recommendation, published on 20 June 2017
  22. Official recommendation of the CSI (Scientific Council of the Institute) of INEE, published on September 21, 2017
  23. Grant, Friedel. "Winners of the LIBER Award for Library Innovation! – 50th LIBER Annual Conference" . Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  24. "LIBER Award: For open, transparent and free science". INRAE Institutionnel. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  25. 1 2 "Biorxiv.org révolutionne la diffusion des travaux de recherche". Le Monde.fr (in French). 2018-03-20. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  26. 1 2 "Publications scientifiques : la guerre est déclarée". Sciences et Avenir (in French). 17 July 2019. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  27. Ádám, Száldobágyi (2020-09-16). "Peer Community: a közösségi szakmai lektorálás színtere". Instantscience (in Hungarian). Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  28. By (2020-08-19). "Revisiting: A Curious Blindness Among Peer Review Initiatives". The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  29. Freeman, Harry (2020-07-31). "Weekly digest: what's happening in open science?". Open Pharma. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  30. "Les bibliothèques/UdeM appuient Peer Community in (PCI), une plateforme de révision par les pairs". Université de Montréal (in French). Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  31. Avissar-Whiting, Michele (2021-02-04). "How the world is adapting to preprints". Nature. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  32. Ahmed, Abubakari; Al-Khatib, Aceil; Boum, Yap; Debat, Humberto; Gurmendi Dunkelberg, Alonso; Hinchliffe, Lisa Janicke; Jarrad, Frith; Mastroianni, Adam; Mineault, Patrick; Pennington, Charlotte R.; Pruszynski, J. Andrew (2023-07-13). "The future of academic publishing". Nature Human Behaviour. 7 (7): 1021–1026. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01637-2. ISSN   2397-3374 . Retrieved 2023-07-16.