Phenomenology (archaeology)

Last updated

In archaeology, phenomenology is the application of sensory experiences to view and interpret an archaeological site or cultural landscape in the past. It views space as socially produced and is concerned with the ways people experience and understand spaces, places, and landscapes. Phenomenology became a part of the Post-processual archaeology movement in the early 1990s and was a reaction to Processual archaeology's proposed 'scientific' treatment of space as an abstract and empty locus for action. [1] In contrast, phenomenology proposes a 'humanized' space which is embedded with meaning and is created through praxis (actions, rituals, social events, and relationships between people and places). [2] Phenomenology therefore treats the landscape as a network of places, each of which bears meaning and is connected through movements and narratives.

Contents

Phenomenological approaches have been the subject of much debate within archaeology, [3] with critics saying the methods are unscientific, subjective, and require an assumption that modern human experiences of a landscape approximate the experiences those of people in the past. Others, however, have found the framework useful in analyses using Geographical Information Systems and Virtual Reality Modeling, despite early phenomenologists in archaeology rejecting these representations in favor of embodied experiences. [4] [5]

Overview

Phenomenological approaches in archaeology first came to widespread attention among archaeologists with the publication of Christopher Tilley's A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments (1994), [6] in which he proposed phenomenology as a technique to discover more about historical peoples and how they interacted with the landscapes in which they lived. Drawing on ethnographic examples from around the world, Tilley proposed that physical connections to the landscape were especially a part of the lives of non-industrial societies and that land “becomes humanized” as specific myths and stories get tied to places in the landscape. Therefore, “Spatial experience is not innocent and neutral, but invested with power relating to age, gender, social position, and relationships with others.” [6] Phenomenological techniques seek to understand this humanized space to gain further insight to how peoples living in hunter-gatherer and agricultural societies related to those landscapes.

In Time, Culture and Identity : An Interpretative Archaeology Julian Thomas proposed phenomenology as a way of overcoming a Cartesian view of the world which separates mind and body, and nature and culture. [7] Thomas says that this split is a cultural product of Modernity which structured Culture-historical archaeology and Processual archaeology, but limits the ways these approaches handle material culture. By enforcing the nature/culture divide, Thomas says culture-historical approaches tend to treat the material as mostly unimportant, focusing on the mental and cultural aspects material culture, while processual archaeology treats culture as not in mind or body, but rather the interaction between people and their environments. [7] As such, Thomas says neither approach allowed archaeologists to study culture directly. Thomas says phenomenology, in contrast, understands material culture in its relationship to a "Being-in-the-world" and therefore culture is not embedded in any one entity but rather the relationships between entities across time. [7] This interpretation of phenomenological approaches prefigures Ian Hodder's theorization of Human-thing-entanglement. [8] [9]

Methodology

In The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Archaeology (2004), Christopher Tilley proposes that all people who seek to engage with and understand a non-neutral 'humanized' space have a human body, and will therefore engage with the landscape in similar ways. [4] By paying close attention to, and documenting, their bodily engagement with the archaeological site and landscape, Tilley says that archaeologists can use phenomenology to better understand prehistoric humanized space. Phenomenological methods therefore include approaching a place from different directions, experiencing it from every angle, spending time there, and exploring its relationships to other landmarks such that one starts to develop “a feeling for the place.” [4] Tilley says that this process allows one to make observations one never could have otherwise. Phenomenological methods are therefore highly reliant on the archaeologists own senses of sight, smell, and hearing as they enter and move about the landscape that they are studying. [3]

Phenomenology in Alternative Representations

According to Christopher Tilley in The Materiality of Stone, phenomenological approaches in archaeology are focused on an embodied experience of the archaeological landscape. [4] Therefore, representational forms of archaeological features such as diagrams, pictures, statistical analyses, geographic information systems, simulations, or narrative descriptions are said to be inadequate to produce phenomenological knowledge or understanding, as they cannot be substituted for first-hand experience. [4] [3] Other archaeologists have found various representational tools useful for expanding one's phenomenological analyses. [3] [5] [10]

Geographical Information Systems

Geographic information systems (GIS) have also been employed to augment phenomenological approaches. [5] [11] [12] Due to the intensive nature of phenomenological methods, sample sizes tend to be small, making it difficult to validate relationships identified through phenomenological research. [13] However, for relationships such as intervisibility between archaeological monuments and landscape features, GIS analyses such as visibility analyses can quickly provide estimations of this experience for a large number of archaeological features. [3] Researchers have paired visibility analyses with models of movement to better understand Spanish colonial surveillance and the effects of colonial architecture in the Andean Highlands. [12] Similar approaches have also been used to model soundsheds in Chaco Canyon, to better understand Ancestral Puebloan ritual and political theater. [14] However, Geographical Information Systems modeling has been critiqued for reifying the Cartesian model of space, [15] and the abstract nature of GIS analyses are far removed from the usually embodied, experiential focus of phenomenological methodologies. [3]

Virtual Reality Modeling

Virtual Reality Modeling (VRM) is one method that has been proposed for augmenting phenomenological approaches. [3] [16] Virtual reality representations overcome shortcomings of two dimensional representations such as maps, diagrams or pictures and allow researchers to digitally move through a space in a way that imitates an embodied experience without having to travel to the location. [3] This allows for any researcher to verify and reproduce experiences of intervisibility, dimension, orientation, or other phenomenologically relevant observations. It can also provide experiences of a place that may not be available today by reconstructing elements of the landscape, removing modern structures, or simulating different environmental contexts. [3] [16] GIS and VRM are also being combined into augmented reality in an effort to "bridge the gap" and bring GIS insights into the phenomenological experience. [17] Nevertheless, Pollard and Gillings say that their efforts in Virtual Reality Modeling are not intended to replace direct observation entirely, as it is impossible to simulate all of the bodily experiences of being at an actual place. [16] Furthermore, like GIS, Virtual Reality Modeling has been critiqued for continuing to maintain a Cartesian model of space and centering of visual experience over other embodied experiences. [15]

Criticism

According to Joanna Brück, phenomenology "has provoked considerable discussion within the discipline", [3] receiving criticism from members of the archaeological community who deem it to be "unscientific" and "subjective". [18] Brück says the crucial phenomenological question is “whether contemporary encounters with the landscape [...] can ever approximate the actual experience of people in the past” [3] and that, in spite of Christopher Tilley's claim that the common use of human bodies between archaeologists and past peoples implies that both groups will engage with the material world in a similar way, the body itself is culturally constituted and bodily engagement with the world will be shaped and controlled by social norms and practices. [3] Therefore, it cannot be assumed that modern human experiences of a space will closely match those of the past simply because they may share a similar physical form. [3] Barret and Ko say that Tilley's idea of a culturally neutral body separated from its history itself relies on a Cartesian separation of body and mind that is at odds with Heidegger's phenomenology which Tilley takes as a foundation for his methods. [1] Therefore, they say that archaeological phenomenology as practiced is premised on a rejection of processual archaeology's claim to seek generalization cross-cultural historical processes, and a rejection of scientific archaeology's methodological consensus, rather than a philosophical alignment with phenomenology. [1]

Others have critiqued the data and interpretations of Tilley and other phenomenological research. Andrew Fleming, says that many of Tilley’s claims that certain megalith structures are oriented so their major axis points to particular landscape features are incorrect. Rather, Fleming claims that the monument's orientations often miss the features Tilley ascribes to them, or if they are oriented with the described feature they are often ignoring other landscape features which Fleming says are much more prominent [13] Furthermore, Fleming says that Tilley's interpretations of Mesolithic megalithic structures fails to account for "the problem of differential site destruction", wherein structures that were constructed near rock outcrops are more likely to survive than those in appealing agricultural areas. [19] Fleming says this difference could explain the apparent prevalence of megalithic structures near outcroppings observed by Tilley. [13]

Notable Applications

Phenomenological approaches have been supported by a great number of archaeologists and are often used in fieldwork alongside other, more traditional methods. Typical examples of the phenomenological approach to landscapes include Christopher Tilley's own recording of the Dorset Cursus, [2] and Tilly's and Barbara Bender and Sue Hamilton's work on the Bronze Age landscapes of Bodmin Moor, England. [20] [21] It was also used to develop an understanding of the famous Neolithic villaggi trincerati of the Tavoliere Plain in Puglia, Italy, in an effort to more explicitly define phenomenological methodologies. [22] [23] Other researchers have used phenomenology to explore the subjectivity of archaeologists, embracing poetic descriptions of history, and performative tellings of the past as well as archeological ones, [24] [25]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of knowledge</span> Field of study

The sociology of knowledge is the study of the relationship between human thought, the social context within which it arises, and the effects that prevailing ideas have on societies. It is not a specialized area of sociology. Instead, it deals with broad fundamental questions about the extent and limits of social influences on individuals' lives and the social-cultural basis of our knowledge about the world. The sociology of knowledge has a subclass and a complement. Its subclass is sociology of scientific knowledge. Its complement is the sociology of ignorance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phenomenology (philosophy)</span> Philosophical method and schools of philosophy

Phenomenology is the philosophical study of objectivity and reality as subjectively lived and experienced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Processual archaeology</span> Theoretical paradigm in archaeology

Processual archaeology is a form of archaeological theory that had its beginnings in 1958 with the work of Gordon Willey and Philip Phillips, Method and Theory in American Archaeology, in which the pair stated that "American archaeology is anthropology, or it is nothing", a rephrasing of Frederic William Maitland's comment: "My own belief is that by and by, anthropology will have the choice between being history, and being nothing." The idea implied that the goals of archaeology were, in fact, the goals of anthropology, which were to answer questions about humans and human culture. That was a critique of the former period in archaeology, the cultural-history phase in which archaeologists thought that any information that artifacts contained about past people and past ways of life would be lost once the items became included in the archaeological record. All they felt could be done was to catalogue, describe, and create timelines based on the artifacts.

Post-processual archaeology, which is sometimes alternatively referred to as the interpretative archaeologies by its adherents, is a movement in archaeological theory that emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations. Despite having a vague series of similarities, post-processualism consists of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions". Within the post-processualist movement, a wide variety of theoretical viewpoints have been embraced, including structuralism and Neo-Marxism, as have a variety of different archaeological techniques, such as phenomenology.

Medieval archaeology is the study of humankind through its material culture, specialising in the period of the European Middle Ages. At its broadest, the period stretches from the 5th to the 16th century and refers to post-Roman but pre-modern remains. The period covers the upheaval caused by the Fall of the Western Roman Empire and cultures such as the Vikings, the Saxons, and the Franks. Archaeologists often specialise in studying either the Early Middle Ages or the High Middle Ages and Late Middle Ages, although many projects and professionals move across these chronological boundaries. The rich nature of the medieval written record means that archaeology has often been seen as the "handmaiden to history", especially in the Late Middle Ages. Analysis of material culture may enrich or call into question written evidence from the medieval period and the two sources of evidence need to be used together. Medieval archaeology has examined the development of medieval settlements, particularly the development of medieval towns, monasteries, and castles. It has also contributed to understanding of the spread and development of Christian monasticism during the medieval period.

Landscape archaeology, a sub-discipline of archaeology and archaeological theory, is the study of the ways in which people in the past constructed and used the environment around them. It is also known as archaeogeography. Landscape archaeology is inherently multidisciplinary in its approach to the study of culture, and is used by pre-historical, classic, and historic archaeologists. The key feature that distinguishes landscape archaeology from other archaeological approaches to sites is that there is an explicit emphasis on the sites' relationships between material culture, human alteration of land/cultural modifications to landscape, and the natural environment. The study of landscape archaeology has evolved to include how landscapes were used to create and reinforce social inequality and to announce one's social status to the community at large. The field includes with the dynamics of geohistorical objects, such as roads, walls, boundaries, trees, and land divisions.

Chris Tilley is a British archaeologist known for his contributions to postprocessualist archaeological theory. He is currently a Professor of Anthropology and Archaeology at University College London.

Environmental archaeology is a sub-field of archaeology which emerged in 1970s and is the science of reconstructing the relationships between past societies and the environments they lived in. The field represents an archaeological-palaeoecological approach to studying the palaeoenvironment through the methods of human palaeoecology. Reconstructing past environments and past peoples' relationships and interactions with the landscapes they inhabited provides archaeologists with insights into the origin and evolution of anthropogenic environments, and prehistoric adaptations and economic practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender archaeology</span> Archaeological sub-discipline

Gender archaeology is a method of studying past societies through their material culture by closely examining the social construction of gender identities and relations.

Cognitive archaeology is a theoretical perspective in archaeology that focuses on the ancient mind. It is divided into two main groups: evolutionary cognitive archaeology (ECA), which seeks to understand human cognitive evolution from the material record, and ideational cognitive archaeology (ICA), which focuses on the symbolic structures discernable in or inferable from past material culture.

Archaeological theory refers to the various intellectual frameworks through which archaeologists interpret archaeological data. Archaeological theory functions as the application of philosophy of science to archaeology, and is occasionally referred to as philosophy of archaeology. There is no one singular theory of archaeology, but many, with different archaeologists believing that information should be interpreted in different ways. Throughout the history of the discipline, various trends of support for certain archaeological theories have emerged, peaked, and in some cases died out. Different archaeological theories differ on what the goals of the discipline are and how they can be achieved.

In physics, phenomenology is the application of theoretical physics to experimental data by making quantitative predictions based upon known theories. It is related to the philosophical notion of the same name in that these predictions describe anticipated behaviors for the phenomena in reality. Phenomenology stands in contrast with experimentation in the scientific method, in which the goal of the experiment is to test a scientific hypothesis instead of making predictions.

Phenomenology may refer to:

GIS or Geographic Information Systems has been an important tool in archaeology since the early 1990s. Indeed, archaeologists were early adopters, users, and developers of GIS and GIScience, Geographic Information Science. The combination of GIS and archaeology has been considered a perfect match, since archaeology often involves the study of the spatial dimension of human behavior over time, and all archaeology carries a spatial component.

Phenomenology or phenomenological psychology, a sub-discipline of psychology, is the scientific study of subjective experiences. It is an approach to psychological subject matter that attempts to explain experiences from the point of view of the subject via the analysis of their written or spoken words. The approach has its roots in the phenomenological philosophical work of Edmund Husserl.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeology</span> Study of human activity via material culture

Archaeology or archeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes. Archaeology can be considered both a social science and a branch of the humanities. It is usually considered an independent academic discipline, but may also be classified as part of anthropology, history or geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sue Hamilton (archaeologist)</span> British archaeologist and professor

Sue Hamilton is a British archaeologist and Professor of Prehistory at the UCL Institute of Archaeology. A material culture specialist and landscape archaeologist, she was the UCL Institute of Archaeology's first permanent female director (2014–22).

Digital archaeology is the application of information technology and digital media to archaeology. It includes the use of digital photography, 3D reconstruction, virtual reality, and geographical information systems, among other techniques. Computational archaeology, which covers computer-based analytical methods, can be considered a subfield of digital archaeology, as can virtual archaeology.

Barbara Bender is an anthropologist and archaeologist. She is currently Emeritus Professor of Heritage Anthropology at University College London.

Leskernick Hill is on Bodmin Moor in Cornwall, UK. It is 329m high and has grid reference SX183803. Leskernick Hill is within the Cornwall AONB as part of Area 12: Bodmin Moor in the parish of Altarnun. It lies in an area of moorland that is common land. Its parent hill is Brown Willy and it is within sight of Rough Tor and other local tors

References

Footnotes
  1. 1 2 3 Barrett, John C.; Ko, Ilhong (October 2009). "A phenomenology of landscape: A crisis in British landscape archaeology?". Journal of Social Archaeology. 9 (3): 275–294. doi:10.1177/1469605309338422. ISSN   1469-6053. S2CID   143694737.
  2. 1 2 Tilley, Christopher (1994). A phenomenology of landscape : places, paths, and monuments. Oxford, UK: Berg. ISBN   0854969195. OCLC   30895684.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Brück, Joanna (2005). "Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory". Archaeological Dialogues. 12 (1): 45–55. doi: 10.1017/S1380203805001583 . ISSN   1380-2038.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Tilley, Christopher Y. (2004). The materiality of stone. Wayne Bennett. Oxford: Berg. ISBN   1-85973-892-3. OCLC   54882015.
  5. 1 2 3 Gillings, Mark (2012). "Landscape Phenomenology, GIS and the Role of Affordance". Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 19 (4): 601–611. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9137-4. ISSN   1072-5369. S2CID   145353092.
  6. 1 2 Tilley, Christopher Y. (1994). A phenomenology of landscape : places, paths, and monuments. Oxford, U.K.: Berg. ISBN   0-85496-919-5. OCLC   30895684.
  7. 1 2 3 Thomas, Julian (1999). Time, culture, and identity : an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge. ISBN   0-203-25888-6. OCLC   50175236.
  8. ↑ Hodder, Ian (2011). "Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective: Human-thing entanglement". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17 (1): 154–177. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
  9. ↑ Hodder, Ian (2012). Entangled : an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN   978-0-470-67211-2. OCLC   758385613.
  10. ↑ Cummings, V. (2000). "Landscapes in motion. Interactive computer imagery and the Neolithic landscapes of the Outer Hebrides". U.K. Chapter of Computer Applications and Quanitative Methods in Archaeology: proceedings of the Fourth Meeting, Cardiff University, 27 and 28 February 1999. BAR international series. Oxford, England: Archaeopress. pp. 11–20. ISBN   978-1-84171-048-8.
  11. ↑ Virtual worlds : concepts, applications and future directions. Liz Falconer, Mari Carmen Gil Ortega. Hauppauge, New York. 2018. ISBN   978-1-5361-3100-0. OCLC   1023002870.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  12. 1 2 Wernke, Steven A.; Kohut, Lauren E.; Traslaviña, Abel (2017). "A GIS of affordances: Movement and visibility at a planned colonial town in highland Peru". Journal of Archaeological Science. 84: 22–39. Bibcode:2017JArSc..84...22W. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.004.
  13. 1 2 3 Fleming, Andrew (1999). "Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: a Dreaming Too Far?". Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 18 (2): 121–122. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00074. ISSN   0262-5253.
  14. ↑ Witt, David; Primeau, Kristy (2018-12-27). "Performance Space, Political Theater, and Audibility in Downtown Chaco". Acoustics. 1 (1): 78–91. doi: 10.3390/acoustics1010007 . ISSN   2624-599X.
  15. 1 2 Stories from the landscape : archaeologies of inhabitation. Adrian M. Chadwick. Oxford, England: Archaeopress. 2004. ISBN   978-1-4073-2653-5. OCLC   607349943.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  16. 1 2 3 Pollard, Joshua; Gillings, Mark (1998). "Romancing the stones: Towards a virtual and elemental Avebury". Archaeological Dialogues. 5 (2): 143–164. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001276. ISSN   1380-2038. S2CID   145291018.
  17. ↑ Eve, Stuart (2012). "Augmenting Phenomenology: Using Augmented Reality to Aid Archaeological Phenomenology in the Landscape". Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 19 (4): 582–600. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9142-7. ISSN   1072-5369. S2CID   4988300.
  18. ↑ Hamilton, Sue; Whitehouse, Ruth; Brown, Keri; Combes, Pamela; Herring, Edward; Thomas, Mike Seager (2006). "Phenomenology in practice: towards a methodology for a 'subjective' approach". European Journal of Archaeology. 9 (1): 31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704. ISSN   1461-9571. S2CID   146497935.
  19. ↑ Fleming, Andrew (2005). "Megaliths and post-modernism: the case of Wales". Antiquity. 79 (306): 921–932. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00115042. ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   162704935.
  20. ↑ Bender, Barbara; Hamilton, Sue; Tilley, Christopher (2007). Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology (Ist ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc. ISBN   978-1-59874-219-0.
  21. ↑ Tilley, Christopher (1996). "The power of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor". World Archaeology. 28 (2): 161–176. doi:10.1080/00438243.1996.9980338. JSTOR   125068 – via JSTOR.
  22. ↑ Hamilton & Whitehouse (2006)
  23. ↑ Hamilton, Sue; Whitehouse, Ruth (2020). Neolithic Spaces: Social and Sensory Landscapes of the First Farmers of Italy (1st ed.). London: Accordia Research Institute. ISBN   978-1-873415-41-2.
  24. ↑ Pearson, Mike (2001). Theatre/archaeology. Michael Shanks. London: Routledge. ISBN   0-415-19457-1. OCLC   45064746.
  25. ↑ Johnson, Matthew H. (2012-10-21). "Phenomenological Approaches in Landscape Archaeology". Annual Review of Anthropology. 41 (1): 269–284. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145840. ISSN   0084-6570.
Bibliography
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.