Piper Aerostar

Last updated
Aerostar / Superstar / Sequoya
TedSmith600AerostarC-FEHK.JPG
An Aerostar 600 in Red Deer, Alberta in 2000
RoleLight transport aircraft
National originUnited States
ManufacturerTed Smith Aircraft Company
Piper Aircraft Corporation
Designer Ted R. Smith
First flight1967
StatusActive service
Produced1967–1984
Number built1,010

The Piper Aerostar (formerly the Ted Smith Aerostar) is an American twin-engined propeller-driven executive or light transport aircraft, designed by Ted R. Smith. It was originally built by Ted Smith Aircraft Company, but the design was acquired in 1978 by the Piper Aircraft Corporation, which continued production of the aircraft as the PA-60.

Contents

Development

After having designed the Aero Commander and Jet Commander, Ted R. Smith founded the Ted Smith Aircraft Company in 1963 to build a new line of aircraft. [1] The first Aerostar prototype, the Model 320, was built with two 160 hp (120 kW) Lycoming IO-320 engines and first flew in November 1966. The same aircraft was upgraded with a pair of 180 hp (130 kW) Lycoming IO-360 engines and a more streamlined vertical fin and renamed the Model 360; it was subsequently upgraded again with 200 hp (150 kW) IO-360s and renamed again as the Model 400. The aircraft finally entered production as the Aerostar 600 with two 290 hp (220 kW) Lycoming IO-540-K engines, first flown in December 1967. Also produced, and the base of most of the subsequent models, was a version with turbocharged engines, the Aerostar 601. [2]

The aircraft were originally built at Van Nuys, California, but in 1968 the company was bought by the American Cement Company. The acquisition was not a success, and in 1969 the company was sold again to Butler Aviation, a major fixed base operator and owners of Mooney Airplane Company. The new company was renamed Aerostar Aircraft Corporation, and plans were made to move production to the Mooney plant at Kerrville, Texas, but this did not occur because Butler got into a dispute with American Cement regarding alleged corrosion problems with the airframe; the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) investigated and found that no such problem existed, but the dispute resulted in a two-year production hiatus. [1] [3] In 1971, Smith attempted to repurchase the rights and announced he would be building an all-new design that was better than the Aerostar, but negotiations broke down. [4] The Bellanca Aircraft Company and Chance Vought also expressed interest in acquiring the design. [1]

In 1972, Ted Smith successfully bought back all the rights to the aircraft and began manufacturing Aerostars under the Ted R. Smith and Associates banner in Santa Maria, California, introducing the pressurized Aerostar 601P along with the Aerostar 700 Superstar. In 1976, the company name was changed to the Ted Smith Aerostar Corporation. [3] 1974 saw the introduction of the successful 601P, which introduced cabin pressurization, allowing more convenient high-altitude operation; the designers were able to adapt the fuselage to pressurization without having to limit its service life. The 601P and the 601B, which was introduced in 1977, both feature improvements to the turbocharging system and a 2.5-foot (0.76 m) greater wingspan, increasing climb rates and making the engines more reliable and easier to operate. [5]

Smith died suddenly in 1976. [6] In 1978, the Aerostar line was acquired by the Piper Aircraft Corporation, which continued to build two variants, the 600A and 601B, and then re-introduced the 601P. [3] Piper continued using the basic Ted Smith model designation system but prefixed each model as the PA-60. [2] [7] Piper introduced the enhanced 602P, which was initially marketed as the Sequoya, [3] [lower-alpha 1] and also put the 700 Superstar into production as the 700P. [5] The 602P was the first model with a turbocharger system built and certified by the engine manufacturer, rather than a turbo system designed and installed by Ted Smith or Piper. [1] After discontinuing production of the non-pressurized models, Piper moved production to Vero Beach, Florida, building the last Aerostar there in 1984. [3] [6]

Smith conducted engineering studies for a jet-powered Aerostar, and also envisioned turboprop power and a single-engine trainer aircraft using the same basic airframe, but these plans never came to fruition during the aircraft's production run. [6] [1]

Design

The Aerostar emerged as a mid-wing cantilever monoplane powered by two wing-mounted piston engines, with retractable landing gear in a tricycle configuration. It is designed to seat six, and is distinguished from light twins of similar size and weight by its high wing loading, careful attention to fine aerodynamic details, a mid wing, and in early models, the absence of cowl flaps; Smith was adamant that they were not needed because of the refined cooling system design. Despite this, the later 700P used cowl flaps because engine cooling of earlier models proved marginal if the system is not maintained rigorously. [5]

The engines of early 601s are turbonormalized—they retain the higher compression ratio typical of a non-turbocharged engine, and the turbo system is designed to primarily to compensate for increasing altitude by providing more boost pressure as the outside air pressure declines. Later models featured a redesigned turbo system intended to increase reliability and be more forgiving of improper operation by the pilot. [5] Unusual Aerostar design features include electrically operated remote fuel valves, which avert the need to run fuel lines into the cockpit; electro-hydraulic nosewheel steering; a flight control system that relies on push-pull rods and torque tubes rather than cables; and unusually thick and stiff wing skins, which—together with the high wing loading—give the Aerostar an unusually smooth ride in turbulence. [1] [5]

Some disadvantages of the aircraft compared to its competitors are the absence of a nose baggage locker, and a cabin that can only be accessed through a single clamshell door next to the pilot's seat; aircraft occupants other than the pilot in command must climb over the folded pilot's seat to access their seats. [5]

Aerostar model numbers nominally refer to the total installed engine horsepower, but some model numbers vary from the precise total, particularly the later models. [3]

Operational history

During the time of production, the Aerostar held the speed record for fastest twin piston general aviation aircraft, [8] capable of cruise speeds from 220 knots (410 km/h; 250 mph) for the earliest 600 models to 261 knots (483 km/h; 300 mph) for the later 700 models. Light construction, low drag, and powerful engines contribute to fast climb rates, while allowing high operating altitudes and class-leading fuel efficiency. [5]

A study of Aerostar accidents by The Aviation Consumer from 1978 to 1982 showed that the Aerostar had an accident rate of 12.9 per 100,000 flight hours, substantially more than the rate of the comparable Beechcraft Baron 58 at 4.9 per 100,000 hours. A similar study conducted by Aviation Safety compared the safety records of eight similar models of twin-piston-engine aircraft and found that the Aerostar had the highest accident and fatal accident rate. According to the studies, the leading cause of Aerostar accidents was engine failures on takeoff. The Aviation Consumer notes that the Aerostar's high wing loading, which contributes to its high cruise speed, also gives it relatively unforgiving flying qualities on takeoff and landing; the aircraft requires relatively long runways, and pilots must keep the airspeed high during approach to avoid falling behind the power curve, which can cause an excessive sink rate. The wing flaps of the Aerostar slow the aircraft relatively quickly, which may induce this problem, so pilots typically do not use the full 20-degree flap setting until the aircraft is close enough to the runway to ensure a safe landing. [1]

The Aerostar has a history of accidents stemming from fuel mismanagement by the pilot. [1] Most later Aerostars have a 41.5-US-gallon (157 L; 34.6 imp gal) fuselage fuel tank and individual 62-US-gallon (230 L; 52 imp gal) fuel tanks in each wing, which all feed into a common chamber near the fuselage tank; the common chamber in turn normally feeds the engines. However, the relative lack of wing dihedral may cause the wing tanks to feed unevenly when used in this manner, causing a fuel imbalance as flight progresses. This problem can be mitigated by using the fuel valves to crossfeed fuel from one wing tank to the opposite engine, bypassing the common chamber; however, the wing tanks are prone to unporting when they are mostly empty, causing engines to lose power or stop running. This hazard can be exacerbated if electrical power is lost, as the electrically operated fuel valves will become inoperable, preventing the pilot from switching back to the fuselage tank. To mitigate these problems, a 1984 airworthiness directive (AD) required owners to install individual, more accurate fuel gauges for each wing tank, a dedicated low-fuel warning light, and placards explaining correct crossfeed procedures. [1] [5]

The Aerostar has a history of problems with the clamshell-style entry door, which is located directly in front of the left-hand propeller, making it critical for the door to be secured before takeoff. A number of accidents have resulted from the upper half of the door coming open in flight and in some cases separating from the aircraft. Although it was not conclusively listed as causal, an unsecured upper door is widely thought to have contributed to a 1988 crash that killed pilot and auto racing driver Al Holbert. [1] That year, the FAA issued an AD requiring inspection of the door rigging, a placard explaining proper door operation, and a dedicated door-ajar warning light. In addition, the FAA has issued warnings regarding an aftermarket door strut which required an installation procedure that may damage a door gusset; the gusset may break in flight and cause the door seal to fail, potentially causing uncontrolled decompression in pressurized versions of the Aerostar. [1]

Although nominally a six-seat aircraft, owners often remove center-row seats because most Aerostars have inadequate payload to simultaneously carry six people, their baggage, and a large fuel load, and removing the seats improves access and legroom in the third-row seats, which are quieter than the other seating positions and are therefore preferred by many passengers. [1] [5]

The Aerostar has a reputation for high maintenance requirements and servicing costs due to a cooling system design that is intolerant of poor maintenance, a lack of working space around various aircraft systems, and a turbo system that is sensitive to exhaust system problems. [1] [5]

The Aerostar type certificate and manufacturing documentation were sold in 1991 to former Ted Smith Aerostar employees Jim Christy and Steve Speer, who operate Aerostar Aircraft Corporation (originally Machen Incorporated [1] ), providing maintenance and support for the aircraft and continued research and development. [5] [6] [9] In 2006, Speer restarted design studies for a jet-powered Aerostar, and in 2010, Aerostar Aircraft first flew the Aerostar Jet, a 601P refitted with a pair of wing-mounted 1,460 lbf (6.5 kN) Pratt & Whitney CW615F engines, providing an estimated maximum cruise speed of 355 knots (657 km/h; 409 mph). In 2014, Aerostar Aircraft said it was investigating production of the aircraft. [6]

Variants

Model 320
First prototype, powered by two 160 hp (120 kW) Lycoming IO-320 engines [10]
Model 360
Modification of first prototype with two 180 hp (130 kW) Lycoming IO-360 engines and a redesigned empennage [2] [11]
Model 400
Modification of first prototype with two 200 hp (150 kW) IO-360 engines; type certified, but did not enter production [10] [11]
Model 500/500P
Projected versions with 250 hp (190 kW) fuel injected engines, to be non-pressurized and pressurized respectively; none built [10]
600 (later PA-60-600)
Initial production model with two 290 hp (220 kW) Lycoming IO-540-K engines, [7] 282 produced under four different company names [10]
600A
Model 600 with some minor detail changes and improved engines, [1] [10] 206 built [1]
600E
Designation used for aircraft sold in Europe [10]
601 (later PA-60-601)
This aircraft still holds the land closed speed record for a production piston twin[ citation needed ]
Model 600 with 290 hp turbocharged Lycoming TIO-540 engines, [7] 117 built [10]
601B
Model 601 with increased wingspan and improved turbo system, [1] [5] 44 built [10]
601P (later PA-60-601P)
Pressurized version of 601 with increased gross weight, [1] [7] increased wingspan and improved turbo system from 601B, [5] [1] 492 built [10]
602P Sequoya (later PA-60-602P)
Piper-developed version of 601P with 290 hp Lycoming TIO-540-AA1A5 engines, 124 built [7] [10]
620
The prototype pressurized Aerostar with 310 hp (230 kW) TIO-540 engines, one built [10] (at Van Nuys in mid-1969)[ citation needed ]
700 Superstar
Prototype of stretched fuselage variant with two IO-540M engines, one built [10]
700P (later PA-60-700P)
602P with counter-rotating 350 hp (260 kW) Lycoming TIO-540-U2A engines, [7] 26 built [10]
702P
New modification of 700P with a reinforced nose gear allowing for higher takeoff weight[ citation needed ]
800
601P with stretched fuselage, enlarged tail and two 400 hp (300 kW) Lycoming engines, one built [10]
Super 700
Machen/Aerostar Aircraft conversion of 601P or 602P with three-bladed Hartzell propellers, 350 hp (260 kW) Lycoming TIO-540-U2A engines, and increased gross weight [1]
Speedstar 850
A modification to replace the twin piston engines with a single nose mounted turboprop [12]
Aerostar Jet
601P with two 1,460 lbf (6.5 kN) Pratt & Whitney CW615F engines; one converted [6]

Accidents and incidents

Specifications (700P)

Data from Jane's Civil and Military Aircraft Upgrades 1994–95 [19]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-28 Cherokee</span> Family of light single engine aircraft

The Piper PA-28 Cherokee is a family of two-seat or four-seat light aircraft built by Piper Aircraft and designed for flight training, air taxi and personal use. The PA-28 family of aircraft comprises all-metal, unpressurized, single piston-engined airplanes with low-mounted wings and tricycle landing gear. They have a single door on the right side, which is entered by stepping on the wing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-32 Cherokee Six</span> Family of light single engine aircraft

The Piper PA-32 Cherokee Six is a series of single-engine, fixed landing gear, light aircraft manufactured in the United States by Piper Aircraft between 1965 and 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-23</span> Family of twin engine general aviation aircraft built 1952–1981

The Piper PA-23, named Apache and later Aztec, is an American four- to six-seat twin-engined light aircraft aimed at the general aviation market. The United States Navy and military forces in other countries also used it in small numbers. Originally designed as the Twin Stinson in the 1950s by the Stinson Aircraft Company, Piper Aircraft manufactured the Apache and a more powerful version, the Aztec, in the United States from the 1950s to the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-24 Comanche</span> American four- or six-seat monoplane built 1956–1972

The Piper PA-24 Comanche is an American single-engine, low-wing, all-metal monoplane of semimonocoque construction with tricycle retractable landing gear and four or six seats. The Comanche was designed and built by Piper Aircraft and first flew on May 24, 1956. Together with the PA-30 and PA-39 Twin Comanches, it made up the core of Piper's lineup until 1972, when the production lines for both aircraft were destroyed in the 1972 Lock Haven flood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-46</span> Single engine general aviation aircraft family

The Piper M-Class is a family of American light aircraft manufactured by Piper Aircraft of Vero Beach, Florida. The aircraft are powered by single engines and have six seats. Twentieth century production of the class was all piston engined, but turboprop versions called the M500, M600 and M700 (Fury) are now also available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beechcraft Baron</span> Light aircraft manufactured 1961–present

The Beechcraft Baron is a light twin-engined piston aircraft designed and produced by Beechcraft. The aircraft was introduced in 1961. A low-wing monoplane developed from the Travel Air, it remains in production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beechcraft Twin Bonanza</span> Twin-piston-engine utility aircraft built 1951–1961

The Beechcraft Model 50 Twin Bonanza is a small twin-engined aircraft designed by Beechcraft as an executive transport for the business market. It was developed to fill a gap in Beechcraft's product line between the single-engined Model 35 Bonanza and the larger Model 18. The Twin Bonanza is dissimilar to the Bonanza, being much larger and heavier and using more powerful engines, while in its earliest form having only half the passenger capacity of the Model 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-30 Twin Comanche</span> American twin-engined cabin monoplane built 1962–1972

The Piper PA-30 Twin Comanche is an American twin-engined cabin monoplane designed and built by Piper Aircraft. It was a twin-engined development of the PA-24 Comanche single-engined aircraft. A variant with counter-rotating propellers was designated the Piper PA-39 Twin Comanche C/R.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-34 Seneca</span> Twin engine light aircraft

The Piper PA-34 Seneca is a twin-engined light aircraft, produced in the United States by Piper Aircraft. It has been in non-continuous production since 1971. The Seneca is primarily used for personal and business flying.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cessna 210 Centurion</span> Six seat retractable gear single-engine general aviation aircraft

The Cessna 210 Centurion is a six-seat, high-performance, retractable-gear, single-engined, high-wing general-aviation light aircraft. First flown in January 1957, it was produced by Cessna until 1986.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycoming O-360</span> Flat-four piston aircraft engine family by Lycoming

The Lycoming O-360 is a family of four-cylinder, direct-drive, horizontally opposed, air-cooled, piston aircraft engines. Engines in the O-360 series produce between 145 and 225 horsepower, with the basic O-360 producing 180 horsepower.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cessna 310</span> Twin-engine general aviation aircraft

The Cessna 310 is an American four-to-six-seat, low-wing, twin-engine monoplane produced by Cessna between 1954 and 1980. It was the second twin-engine aircraft that Cessna put into production; the first was the Cessna T-50.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-32R</span> Lance/Saratoga six-place aircraft (built 1975–2009)

The Piper PA-32R is a six-seat, high-performance, single engine, all-metal, fixed-wing aircraft produced by Piper Aircraft of Vero Beach, Florida. The design began life as the Piper Lance, a retractable-gear version of the Piper Cherokee Six. Later models became known by the designation Piper Saratoga. The primary difference between the Lance and early Saratoga is the development of a tapered wing on the Saratoga, replacing the "Hershey bar" wing on the Lance that was a carryover from the Cherokee Six. Later Saratoga models provided updated/improved avionics, engine and interior touches but retained the same airframe design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-31 Navajo</span> Family of twin engine aircraft built 1967–1984

The Piper PA-31 Navajo is a family of twin-engined utility aircraft designed and built by Piper Aircraft for small cargo and feeder airlines, and as a corporate aircraft. Production ran from 1967 to 1984. It was license-built in a number of Latin American countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-16 Clipper</span> 1940s American light aircraft

The Piper PA-16 Clipper is an extended fuselage model of the PA-15 Vagabond. Both models were designed in 1947 for the same reason – Piper Aircraft found itself in dire financial straits and needed to create new, competitive models using existing parts and tooling. The result was the Vagabond, essentially a side-by-side version of the tandem J-3 Cub credited with saving the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycoming O-540</span> Family of flat-six piston aircraft engines

The Lycoming O-540 is a family of air-cooled six-cylinder, horizontally opposed fixed-wing aircraft and helicopter engines of 541.5 cubic inches (8,874 cc) displacement, manufactured by Lycoming Engines. The engine is a six-cylinder version of the four-cylinder Lycoming O-360.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cessna 340</span> Twin piston engine pressurized general aviation airplane

The Cessna 340 is a twin piston engine pressurized business aircraft that was manufactured by Cessna.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser</span> 1940s American light aircraft

The Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser is an American three-seat, high wing, single-engine conventional landing gear-equipped light aircraft that was produced by Piper Aircraft between 1946-48. The PA-12 was an upgraded and redesignated Piper J-5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piper PA-36 Pawnee Brave</span> Type of aircraft

The Piper PA-36 Pawnee Brave is a 1970s American single-engined, low-wing, propeller-driven agricultural plane built by Piper Aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rockwell Commander 112</span> Type of aircraft

The Rockwell Commander 112 is an American four-seat single-engined general aviation aircraft designed and built by North American Rockwell starting in 1972. In 1976, they introduced the turbocharged version 112TC and mounting a larger engine with other minor improvements they introduced the Rockwell Commander 114. A total of approximately 1,300 examples of all models were produced before the production line shut down in 1980. In 1981, the type certificate owner was Gulfstream Aerospace, but that company had no interest in single-engine piston production.

References

Notes

  1. Simpson says the Sequoya is the 601P on page 326 but says it's the 602P on Page 327. [2] 602P is more consistent with the previous model history.

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 "Aerostar 600, 700 series". aviationconsumer.com. The Aviation Consumer. October 29, 2019. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Simpson 1991, pp. 326–327.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Simpson 1991, p. 326.
  4. Air Progress: 16. December 1971.{{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Cook, Mark (August 5, 1998). "The Aerostars". aopa.org. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association . Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hirschman, Dave (February 5, 2014). "Ted Smith's Dream: Record-setting piston twin sprouts jet engines". aopa.org. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association . Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Type Certificate Data Sheet No. A17WE". Federal Aviation Administration . Retrieved June 12, 2024.
  8. "Certified Aircraft Database: Aerostar". Pilotfriend.com. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  9. "ABOUT - Aerostar Aircraft". aerostaraircraft.com. 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Simpson 1991, p. 327.
  11. 1 2 Taylor 1967, p. 360.
  12. Twin and Turbine Magazine. September 2010.{{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. "Race Driver Holbert Dies in Plane Crash". Los Angeles Times . Los Angeles. October 2, 1988. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  14. Aviation Investigation Final Report (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. June 25, 1990. CHI88FA249. Retrieved July 4, 2024.
  15. King, Larry (April 5, 1991). "Sen. John Heinz killed in plane crash in Philadelphia". The Baltimore Sun . Archived from the original on 2012-09-13.
  16. Aircraft Accident/Incident Summary Report (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. September 17, 1991. AAR9101S via NTSB.gov.
  17. "MEXICO PLANE CRASH KILLS MAESTRO EDUARDO MATA". The Deseret News . Associated Press. January 5, 1995. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  18. "Takeoff (climb) Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archive". baaa-acro.com. Retrieved July 3, 2024.
  19. Michell 1994, pp. 385–386.
  20. 55% power

Bibliography