Wing loading

Last updated

The Monarch Butterfly has a very low 0.168 kg/m wing loading Monarch In May.jpg
The Monarch Butterfly has a very low 0.168 kg/m wing loading
The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 has a high 837 kg/m maximum wing loading Fedex-md11-N525FE-051109-21-16.jpg
The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 has a high 837 kg/m maximum wing loading

In aerodynamics, wing loading is the total weight of an aircraft or flying animal divided by the area of its wing. [1] [lower-alpha 1] The stalling speed, takeoff speed and landing speed of an aircraft are partly determined by its wing loading. [2]

Contents

The faster an aircraft flies, the more its lift is changed by a change in angle of attack so a smaller wing is less adversely affected by vertical gusts. Consequently, faster aircraft generally have higher wing loadings than slower aircraft in order to avoid excessive response to vertical gusts. [3]

A higher wing loading also decreases maneuverability. The same constraints apply to winged biological organisms.

Range of wing loadings

Wing loading examples [4]
AircraftTypeIntroduction MTOW Wing areakg/m2lb/sqft
Monarch Butterfly Animal Cenozoic 0.1680.034
birds [lower-alpha 2] Animal Cretaceous 1–200.20–4.10 [5]
bird flight upper critical limitAnimal255.1 [6]
Ozone Buzz Z3 MS Paraglider 201075–95 kg (165–209 lb)25.8 m2 (278 sq ft)2.9–3.70.59–0.76 [7]
Wills Wing Sport 2 155 Hang glider 200494.8–139.8 kg (209–308 lb)14.4 m2 (155 sq ft)6.6–9.71.4–2.0 [8]
Gin Fluid 11 Speed flyer 2010140 kg11 m2 (120 sq ft)12.72.6
upper limit Microlift glider 2008220 kg (490 lb) max.12.2 m2 (131 sq ft) min. [lower-alpha 3] 183.7 [9]
CAA (UK) regulations microlight wing loading limit2008 [lower-alpha 4] 450 kg (990 lb) max. [lower-alpha 5] 18 m2 (190 sq ft) min. [lower-alpha 6] 255.1 [10]
Schleicher ASW 22 Glider 1981850 kg (1,870 lb)16.7 m2 (180 sq ft)50.910.4
Piper Warrior General aviation 19601,055 kg (2,326 lb)15.14 m2 (163.0 sq ft)69.714.3
Beechcraft Baron General aviation twin-engine19602,313 kg (5,099 lb)18.5 m2 (199 sq ft)12526
Supermarine Spitfire Fighter (WWII) 19383,039 kg (6,700 lb)22.48 m2 (242.0 sq ft)13528
Beechcraft Airliner Airliner (commuter) 19684,727 kg (10,421 lb)25.99 m2 (279.8 sq ft)18237
Learjet 31 Business jet 19907,031 kg (15,501 lb)24.57 m2 (264.5 sq ft)28659
Mikoyan MiG-23 Fighter (variable-geometry)197017,800 kg (39,200 lb)34.16–37.35 m2 (367.7–402.0 sq ft)477–52198–107
Lockheed F-104 Starfighter Fighter (multi-role) 195813,166 kg (29,026 lb)18.22 m2 (196.1 sq ft)722.6148.0
General Dynamics F-16 Fighter (multi-role) 197819,200 kg (42,300 lb)27.87 m2 (300.0 sq ft)688.9141.1
McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle Fighter (air superiority) 197630,845 kg (68,002 lb)56.5 m2 (608 sq ft)546112
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 Fighter (Interceptor)197036,720 kg (80,950 lb)61.4 m2 (661 sq ft)598122
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Strategic Reconnaissance Aircraft196668,946 kg (152,000 lb)170 m2 (1,800 sq ft)40683
Fokker F27 Airliner (turboprop)195819,773 kg (43,592 lb)70 m2 (750 sq ft)28258
Fokker F28 Fellowship Airliner (regional jet) 196933,000 kg (73,000 lb)78.97 m2 (850.0 sq ft)41886
Boeing 737-400 Airliner (Narrow-body)198462,820 kg (138,490 lb)91.04 m2 (979.9 sq ft)690140
Boeing 737-900ER Airliner (Narrow-body)200785,139 kg (187,699 lb)124.6 m2 (1,341 sq ft)683140
Airbus A321XLR Airliner (Narrow-body)2024 (est)101,015 kg (222,700 lb)122.4 m2 (1,318 sq ft)825169
Boeing 767-300ER [11] Airliner (Wide-body)1982181,437 kg (400,000 lb)283.3 m2 (3,049 sq ft)640130
Concorde Airliner (supersonic) 1976187,000 kg (412,000 lb)358.2 m2 (3,856 sq ft)522107
Rockwell B-1B Lancer Bomber (variable-geometry)1983148,000 kg (326,000 lb)181.2 m2 (1,950 sq ft)818168
McDonnell Douglas MD-11 [11] Airliner (wide-body)1990283,720 kg (625,500 lb)338.9 m2 (3,648 sq ft)837171
Boeing 777-300ERAirliner (wide-body)2004351,533 kg (774,998 lb)436.8 m2 (4,702 sq ft)805165
Airbus A340-500/600 [11] Airliner (wide-body)2002365,000 kg (805,000 lb)437.3 m2 (4,707 sq ft)835171
Boeing 747-400 [11] Airliner (wide-body)1988396,830 kg (874,860 lb)525 m2 (5,650 sq ft)756155
Airbus A380 Airliner (wide-body)2007575,000 kg (1,268,000 lb)845 m2 (9,100 sq ft)680140

Effect on performance

Wing loading is a useful measure of the stalling speed of an aircraft. Wings generate lift owing to the motion of air around the wing. Larger wings move more air, so an aircraft with a large wing area relative to its mass (i.e., low wing loading) will have a lower stalling speed. Therefore, an aircraft with lower wing loading will be able to take off and land at a lower speed (or be able to take off with a greater load). It will also be able to turn at a greater rate.

Effect on takeoff and landing speeds

The lift force L on a wing of area A, traveling at true airspeed v is given by

,

where ρ is the density of air and CL is the lift coefficient. The lift coefficient is a dimensionless number which depends on the wing cross-sectional profile and the angle of attack. [12] At steady flight, neither climbing nor diving, the lift force and the weight are equal. With L/A = Mg/A =WSg, where M is the aircraft mass, WS = M/A the wing loading (in mass/area units, i.e. lb/ft2 or kg/m2, not force/area) and g the acceleration due to gravity, that equation gives the speed v through [13]

.

As a consequence, aircraft with the same CL at takeoff under the same atmospheric conditions will have takeoff speeds proportional to . So if an aircraft's wing area is increased by 10% and nothing else is changed, the takeoff speed will fall by about 5%. Likewise, if an aircraft designed to take off at 150 mph grows in weight during development by 40%, its takeoff speed increases to = 177 mph.

Some flyers rely on their muscle power to gain speed for takeoff over land or water. Ground nesting and water birds have to be able to run or paddle at their takeoff speed before they can take off. The same is true for a hang glider pilot, though they may get assistance from a downhill run. For all these, a low WS is critical, whereas passerines and cliff dwelling birds can get airborne with higher wing loadings.

Effect on turning performance

To turn, an aircraft must roll in the direction of the turn, increasing the aircraft's bank angle. Turning flight lowers the wing's lift component against gravity and hence causes a descent. To compensate, the lift force must be increased by increasing the angle of attack by use of up elevator deflection which increases drag. Turning can be described as 'climbing around a circle' (wing lift is diverted to turning the aircraft) so the increase in wing angle of attack creates even more drag. The tighter the turn radius attempted, the more drag induced; this requires that power (thrust) be added to overcome the drag. The maximum rate of turn possible for a given aircraft design is limited by its wing size and available engine power: the maximum turn the aircraft can achieve and hold is its sustained turn performance. As the bank angle increases so does the g-force applied to the aircraft, this having the effect of increasing the wing loading and also the stalling speed. This effect is also experienced during level pitching maneuvers. [14]

Load factor varying with altitude at 50 or 100 lb/sq ft P334a(1).jpg
Load factor varying with altitude at 50 or 100 lb/sq ft

As stalling is due to wing loading and maximum lift coefficient at a given altitude and speed, this limits the turning radius due to maximum load factor. At Mach 0.85 and 0.7 lift coefficient, a wing loading of 50 lb/sq ft (240 kg/m2) can reach a structural limit of 7.33 g up to 15,000 feet (4,600 m) and then decreases to 2.3 g at 40,000 feet (12,000 m). With a wing loading of 100 lb/sq ft (490 kg/m2) the load factor is twice smaller and barely reaches 1g at 40,000 feet. [15]

Aircraft with low wing loadings tend to have superior sustained turn performance because they can generate more lift for a given quantity of engine thrust. The immediate bank angle an aircraft can achieve before drag seriously bleeds off airspeed is known as its instantaneous turn performance. An aircraft with a small, highly loaded wing may have superior instantaneous turn performance, but poor sustained turn performance: it reacts quickly to control input, but its ability to sustain a tight turn is limited. A classic example is the F-104 Starfighter, which has a very small wing and high 723 kg/m2 (148 lb/sq ft) wing loading.

At the opposite end of the spectrum was the large Convair B-36: its large wings resulted in a low 269 kg/m2 (55 lb/sq ft) wing loading that could make it sustain tighter turns at high altitude than contemporary jet fighters, while the slightly later Hawker Hunter had a similar wing loading of 344 kg/m2 (70 lb/sq ft). The Boeing 367-80 airliner prototype could be rolled at low altitudes with a wing loading of 387 kg/m2 (79 lb/sq ft) at maximum weight.

Like any body in circular motion, an aircraft that is fast and strong enough to maintain level flight at speed v in a circle of radius R accelerates towards the center at . That acceleration is caused by the inward horizontal component of the lift, , where is the banking angle. Then from Newton's second law,

Solving for R gives

The lower the wing loading, the tighter the turn.

Gliders designed to exploit thermals need a small turning circle in order to stay within the rising air column, and the same is true for soaring birds. Other birds, for example those that catch insects on the wing also need high maneuverability. All need low wing loadings.

Effect on stability

Wing loading also affects gust response, the degree to which the aircraft is affected by turbulence and variations in air density. A small wing has less area on which a gust can act, both of which serve to smooth the ride. For high-speed, low-level flight (such as a fast low-level bombing run in an attack aircraft), a small, thin, highly loaded wing is preferable: aircraft with a low wing loading are often subject to a rough, punishing ride in this flight regime. The F-15E Strike Eagle has a wing loading of 650 kilograms per square metre (130 lb/sq ft) (excluding fuselage contributions to the effective area), whereas most delta wing aircraft (such as the Dassault Mirage III, for which WS = 387 kg/m2) tend to have large wings and low wing loadings.[ citation needed ]

Quantitatively, if a gust produces an upward pressure of G (in N/m2, say) on an aircraft of mass M, the upward acceleration a will, by Newton's second law be given by

,

decreasing with wing loading.

Effect of development

A further complication with wing loading is that it is difficult to substantially alter the wing area of an existing aircraft design (although modest improvements are possible). As aircraft are developed they are prone to "weight growth"—the addition of equipment and features that substantially increase the operating mass of the aircraft. An aircraft whose wing loading is moderate in its original design may end up with very high wing loading as new equipment is added. Although engines can be replaced or upgraded for additional thrust, the effects on turning and takeoff performance resulting from higher wing loading are not so easily reconciled.

Water ballast use in gliders

Modern gliders often use water ballast carried in the wings to increase wing loading when soaring conditions are strong. By increasing the wing loading the average speed achieved across country can be increased to take advantage of strong thermals. With a higher wing loading, a given lift-to-drag ratio is achieved at a higher airspeed than with a lower wing loading, and this allows a faster average speed across country. The ballast can be ejected overboard when conditions weaken or prior to landing.

Design considerations

Fuselage lift

The F-15E Strike Eagle has a large relatively lightly loaded wing A U S Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft assigned to the 494th Fighter Squadron flies over the Mediterranean Sea during a training mission (modified).jpg
The F-15E Strike Eagle has a large relatively lightly loaded wing

A blended wing-fuselage design such as that found on the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon or Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum helps to reduce wing loading; in such a design the fuselage generates aerodynamic lift, thus improving wing loading while maintaining high performance.

Variable-sweep wing

Aircraft like the Grumman F-14 Tomcat and the Panavia Tornado employ variable-sweep wings. As their wing area varies in flight so does the wing loading (although this is not the only benefit). When the wing is in the forward position takeoff and landing performance is greatly improved. [16]

Flaps

Like all aircraft flaps, Fowler flaps increase the camber and hence the maximum value of lift coefficient (CLmax) lowering the landing speed. They also increase wing area, decreasing the wing loading, which further lowers the landing speed. [17]

High lift devices such as certain flaps allow the option of smaller wings to be used in a design in order to achieve similar landing speeds compared to an alternate design using a larger wing without a high lift device. Such options allow for higher wing loading in a design. This may result in beneficial features, such as higher cruise speeds or a reduction in bumpiness at high speed low altitude flight (the latter feature is very important for close air support aircraft roles). For instance, Lockheed's Starfighter uses internal Blown flaps to achieve a high wing loading design (723 kg/m²) which allows it a much smoother low altitude flight at full throttle speeds compared to low wing loading delta designs such as the Mirage 2000 or Mirage III (387 kg/m²). The F-16 which has a relatively high wing loading of 689 kg/m² uses leading-edge extensions to increase wing lift at high angles of attack.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stall (fluid dynamics)</span> Abrupt reduction in lift due to flow separation

In fluid dynamics, a stall is a reduction in the lift coefficient generated by a foil as angle of attack increases. This occurs when the critical angle of attack of the foil is exceeded. The critical angle of attack is typically about 15°, but it may vary significantly depending on the fluid, foil, and Reynolds number.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft flight dynamics</span> Science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions

Flight dynamics is the science of air vehicle orientation and control in three dimensions. The three critical flight dynamics parameters are the angles of rotation in three dimensions about the vehicle's center of gravity (cg), known as pitch, roll and yaw. These are collectively known as aircraft attitude, often principally relative to the atmospheric frame in normal flight, but also relative to terrain during takeoff or landing, or when operating at low elevation. The concept of attitude is not specific to fixed-wing aircraft, but also extends to rotary aircraft such as helicopters, and dirigibles, where the flight dynamics involved in establishing and controlling attitude are entirely different.

In fluid dynamics, angle of attack is the angle between a reference line on a body and the vector representing the relative motion between the body and the fluid through which it is moving. Angle of attack is the angle between the body's reference line and the oncoming flow. This article focuses on the most common application, the angle of attack of a wing or airfoil moving through air.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed L-2000</span> Proposed US supersonic airliner design

The Lockheed L-2000 was Lockheed Corporation's entry in a government-funded competition to build the United States' first supersonic airliner in the 1960s. The L-2000 lost the contract to the Boeing 2707, but that competing design was ultimately canceled for political, environmental and economic reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airfoil</span> Cross-sectional shape of a wing, blade of a propeller, rotor, or turbine, or sail

An airfoil or aerofoil is a streamlined body that is capable of generating significantly more lift than drag. Wings, sails and propeller blades are examples of airfoils. Foils of similar function designed with water as the working fluid are called hydrofoils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lift-to-drag ratio</span> Measure of aerodynamic efficiency

In aerodynamics, the lift-to-drag ratio is the lift generated by an aerodynamic body such as an aerofoil or aircraft, divided by the aerodynamic drag caused by moving through air. It describes the aerodynamic efficiency under given flight conditions. The L/D ratio for any given body will vary according to these flight conditions.

In fluid dynamics, the lift coefficient is a dimensionless quantity that relates the lift generated by a lifting body to the fluid density around the body, the fluid velocity and an associated reference area. A lifting body is a foil or a complete foil-bearing body such as a fixed-wing aircraft. CL is a function of the angle of the body to the flow, its Reynolds number and its Mach number. The section lift coefficient cl refers to the dynamic lift characteristics of a two-dimensional foil section, with the reference area replaced by the foil chord.

Lift-induced drag, induced drag, vortex drag, or sometimes drag due to lift, in aerodynamics, is an aerodynamic drag force that occurs whenever a moving object redirects the airflow coming at it. This drag force occurs in airplanes due to wings or a lifting body redirecting air to cause lift and also in cars with airfoil wings that redirect air to cause a downforce. It is symbolized as , and the lift-induced drag coefficient as .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blown flap</span> High-lift device on some aircraft wings

Blown flaps, blown wing or jet flaps are powered aerodynamic high-lift devices used on the wings of certain aircraft to improve their low-speed flight characteristics. They use air blown through nozzles to shape the airflow over the rear edge of the wing, directing the flow downward to increase the lift coefficient. There are a variety of methods to achieve this airflow, most of which use jet exhaust or high-pressure air bled off of a jet engine's compressor and then redirected to follow the line of trailing-edge flaps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flap (aeronautics)</span> Anti-stalling high-lift device on aircraft

A flap is a high-lift device used to reduce the stalling speed of an aircraft wing at a given weight. Flaps are usually mounted on the wing trailing edges of a fixed-wing aircraft. Flaps are used to reduce the take-off distance and the landing distance. Flaps also cause an increase in drag so they are retracted when not needed.

In fluid dynamics, drag, sometimes referred to as fluid resistance, is a force acting opposite to the relative motion of any object, moving with respect to a surrounding fluid. This can exist between two fluid layers, two solid surfaces, or between a fluid and solid surface. Drag forces tend to decrease fluid velocity relative to the solid object in the fluid's path.

A banked turn is a turn or change of direction in which the vehicle banks or inclines, usually towards the inside of the turn. For a road or railroad this is usually due to the roadbed having a transverse down-slope towards the inside of the curve. The bank angle is the angle at which the vehicle is inclined about its longitudinal axis with respect to the horizontal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Range (aeronautics)</span> Distance an aircraft can fly between takeoff and landing

The maximal total range is the maximum distance an aircraft can fly between takeoff and landing. Powered aircraft range is limited by the aviation fuel energy storage capacity considering both weight and volume limits. Unpowered aircraft range depends on factors such as cross-country speed and environmental conditions. The range can be seen as the cross-country ground speed multiplied by the maximum time in the air. The fuel time limit for powered aircraft is fixed by the available fuel and rate of consumption.

In aerodynamics, the zero-lift drag coefficient is a dimensionless parameter which relates an aircraft's zero-lift drag force to its size, speed, and flying altitude.

In aeronautics, the load factor is the ratio of the lift of an aircraft to its weight and represents a global measure of the stress ("load") to which the structure of the aircraft is subjected:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supermarine Type 322</span> Type of aircraft

The Supermarine Type 322 was a prototype British carrier-borne torpedo, dive bomber and reconnaissance aircraft of the Second World War. A single-engined monoplane, it was unsuccessful, with only two examples being built. The Fairey Barracuda, built to the same specification, would fill this role.

In flight dynamics, longitudinal stability is the stability of an aircraft in the longitudinal, or pitching, plane. This characteristic is important in determining whether an aircraft pilot will be able to control the aircraft in the pitching plane without requiring excessive attention or excessive strength.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trapezoidal wing</span> Aircraft wing shape

In aeronautics, a trapezoidal wing is a straight-edged and tapered wing planform. It may have any aspect ratio and may or may not be swept.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akaflieg München Mü28</span> Single-seat German research glider, 1983

The Akaflieg München Mü28 is a research glider aircraft that was designed and built in Germany in 1983. Only one example of the design was built.

Propeller theory is the science governing the design of efficient propellers. A propeller is the most common propulsor on ships, and on small aircraft.

References

Notes

  1. "Wing Loading Definition". Merriam Webster.
  2. 1 2 "Chapter 11: Aircraft Performance". Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25C ed.). Federal Aviation Administration. 17 July 2023. pp. 8–9.
  3. Wragg, David W. (1973). A Dictionary of Aviation (first ed.). Osprey. p. 281. ISBN   9780850451634.
  4. Hendrik Tennekes (2009). The simple science of Flight: From Insects to Jumbo Jets. MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-51313-5., "Figure 2: The great flight diagram".
  5. Thomas Alerstam, Mikael Rosén, Johan Bäckman, Per G. P Ericson, Olof Hellgren (17 July 2007). "Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects". PLOS Biology. 5 (8): e197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050197 . PMC   1914071 . PMID   17645390.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. Meunier, K. Korrelation und Umkonstruktionen in den Größenbeziehungen zwischen Vogelflügel und Vogelkörper-Biologia Generalis 1951: pp. 403-443. [Article in German]
  7. Gérard Florit (23 January 2016). "Ozone Buzz Z3". P@r@2000.
  8. "Sport 2 / 2C". Wills Wing.
  9. "Sporting Code Section 3: Gliding". Fédération Aéronautique Internationale. 12 October 2016.
  10. "Microlights". UK Civil Aviation Authority. or a stalling speed at the maximum weight authorised not exceeding 35 knots calibrated speed
  11. 1 2 3 4 Lloyd R. Jenkinson; Paul Simpkin; Darren Rhodes (30 July 1999). "Aircraft Data File". Civil Jet Aircraft Design. Elsevier Limited.
  12. Anderson, 1999 p. 58
  13. Anderson, 1999 pp. 201–3
  14. Spick, 1986. p. 24.
  15. Laurence K. Loftin Jr. (1985). "Chapter 11 - Aircraft Maneuverability". Quest for Performance - The Evolution of Modern Aircraft. NASA Scientific and Technical Information Branch.
  16. Spick, 1986. pp. 84–87.
  17. Anderson 1999, pp. 30–1

Bibliography

Notes

  1. For aircraft, this includes area of ailerons. [2]
  2. 138 species from 10 g to 10 kg, from small passerines to swans and cranes
  3. at max weight
  4. legislation enacted
  5. for a two seat landplane
  6. at max weight