Positional game

Last updated

A positional game [1] [2] is a kind of a combinatorial game for two players. It is described by:

Contents

During the game, players alternately claim previously-unclaimed positions, until one of the players wins. If all positions in are taken while no player wins, the game is considered a draw.

The classic example of a positional game is tic-tac-toe. In it, contains the 9 squares of the game-board, contains the 8 lines that determine a victory (3 horizontal, 3 vertical and 2 diagonal), and the winning criterion is: the first player who holds an entire winning-set wins. Other examples of positional games are Hex and the Shannon switching game.

For every positional game there are exactly three options: either the first player has a winning strategy, or the second player has a winning strategy, or both players have strategies to enforce a draw. [2] :7 The main question of interest in the study of these games is which of these three options holds in any particular game.

A positional game is finite, deterministic and has perfect information; therefore, in theory it is possible to create the full game tree and determine which of these three options holds. In practice, however, the game-tree might be enormous. Therefore, positional games are usually analyzed via more sophisticated combinatorial techniques.

Alternative terminology

Often, the input to a positional game is considered a hypergraph. In this case:

Variants

There are many variants of positional games, differing in their rules and their winning criteria.

Different winning criteria

Strong positional game (also called Maker-Maker game)
The first player to claim all of the elements of a winning set wins. If the game ends with all elements of the board claimed, but no player has claimed all elements of a winning set, it is a draw. An example is classic tic-tac-toe.
Maker-Breaker game
The two players are called Maker and Breaker. Maker wins by claiming all elements of a winning set. If the game ends with all elements of the board claimed, and Maker has not yet won, then Breaker wins. Draws are not possible. An example is the Shannon switching game.
Avoider-Enforcer game
The players are called Avoider and Enforcer. Enforcer wins if Avoider ever claims all of the elements of a winning set. If the game ends with all elements of the board claimed, and Avoider has not claimed a winning set, then Avoider wins. As in maker-breaker games, a draw is not possible. An example is Sim.
Discrepancy game
The players are called Balancer and Unbalancer. Balancer wins if he ensures that in all winning sets, each player has roughly half of the vertices. Otherwise Unbalancer wins.
Scoring game
Comparing at the end the winning sets obtained by the players, whoever has the winning set with the highest score wins, where the score of each winning set is given in the instance. An example is the Largest Connected Subgraph Game, where the positions are the vertices of a graph, the winning sets are connected subgraphs and the winner is the one who obtains the largest connected subgraph.

Different game rules

Waiter-Client game (also called Picker-Chooser game)
the players are called Waiter and Client. In each turn, Waiter picks two positions and shows them to Client, who can choose one of them.
Biased positional game
each positional game has a biased variant, in which the first player can take p elements at a time and the second player can take q elements at a time (in the unbiased variant, p=q=1).

Specific games

The following table lists some specific positional games that were widely studied in the literature.

NamePositionsWinning sets
Multi-dimensional tic-tac-toe All squares in a multi-dimensional boxAll straight lines
Shannon switching game All edges of a graphAll paths from s to t
Sim All edges between 6 vertices.All triangles [losing sets].
Clique game (aka Ramsey game)All edges of a complete graph of size nAll cliques of size k
Connectivity game All edges of a complete graph All spanning trees
Hamiltonicity game All edges of a complete graph All Hamiltonian paths
Non-planarity game All edges of a complete graph All non-planar sub-graphs
Arithmetic progression game The numbers {1,...,n}All arithmetic progressions of size k

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tic-tac-toe</span> Paper-and-pencil game for two players

Tic-tac-toe, noughts and crosses, or Xs and Os is a paper-and-pencil game for two players who take turns marking the spaces in a three-by-three grid with X or O. The player who succeeds in placing three of their marks in a horizontal, vertical, or diagonal row is the winner. It is a solved game, with a forced draw assuming best play from both players.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Combinatorial game theory</span> Branch of game theory about two-player sequential games with perfect information

Combinatorial game theory is a branch of mathematics and theoretical computer science that typically studies sequential games with perfect information. Study has been largely confined to two-player games that have a position that the players take turns changing in defined ways or moves to achieve a defined winning condition. Combinatorial game theory has not traditionally studied games of chance or those that use imperfect or incomplete information, favoring games that offer perfect information in which the state of the game and the set of available moves is always known by both players. However, as mathematical techniques advance, the types of game that can be mathematically analyzed expands, thus the boundaries of the field are ever changing. Scholars will generally define what they mean by a "game" at the beginning of a paper, and these definitions often vary as they are specific to the game being analyzed and are not meant to represent the entire scope of the field.

The Shannon switching game is a connection game for two players, invented by American mathematician and electrical engineer Claude Shannon, the "father of information theory", some time before 1951. Two players take turns coloring the edges of an arbitrary graph. One player has the goal of connecting two distinguished vertices by a path of edges of their color. The other player aims to prevent this by using their color instead. The game is commonly played on a rectangular grid; this special case of the game was independently invented by American mathematician David Gale in the late 1950s and is known as Gale or Bridg-It.

In mathematics, the Hales–Jewett theorem is a fundamental combinatorial result of Ramsey theory named after Alfred W. Hales and Robert I. Jewett, concerning the degree to which high-dimensional objects must necessarily exhibit some combinatorial structure.

In combinatorial game theory, the strategy-stealing argument is a general argument that shows, for many two-player games, that the second player cannot have a guaranteed winning strategy. The strategy-stealing argument applies to any symmetric game in which an extra move can never be a disadvantage. A key property of a strategy-stealing argument is that it proves that the first player can win the game without actually constructing such a strategy. So, although it might prove the existence of a winning strategy, the proof gives no information about what that strategy is.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abstract simplicial complex</span> Mathematical object

In combinatorics, an abstract simplicial complex (ASC), often called an abstract complex or just a complex, is a family of sets that is closed under taking subsets, i.e., every subset of a set in the family is also in the family. It is a purely combinatorial description of the geometric notion of a simplicial complex. For example, in a 2-dimensional simplicial complex, the sets in the family are the triangles, their edges, and their vertices.

In graph theory, a haven is a certain type of function on sets of vertices in an undirected graph. If a haven exists, it can be used by an evader to win a pursuit–evasion game on the graph, by consulting the function at each step of the game to determine a safe set of vertices to move into. Havens were first introduced by Seymour & Thomas (1993) as a tool for characterizing the treewidth of graphs. Their other applications include proving the existence of small separators on minor-closed families of graphs, and characterizing the ends and clique minors of infinite graphs.

A Maker-Breaker game is a kind of positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by its set of positions/points/elements and its family of winning-sets. It is played by two players, called Maker and Breaker, who alternately take previously untaken elements.

The graph coloring game is a mathematical game related to graph theory. Coloring game problems arose as game-theoretic versions of well-known graph coloring problems. In a coloring game, two players use a given set of colors to construct a coloring of a graph, following specific rules depending on the game we consider. One player tries to successfully complete the coloring of the graph, when the other one tries to prevent him from achieving it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultimate tic-tac-toe</span> Variant of tic-tac-toe game

Ultimate tic-tac-toe is a board game composed of nine tic-tac-toe boards arranged in a 3 × 3 grid. Players take turns playing on the smaller tic-tac-toe boards until one of them wins on the larger board. Compared to traditional tic-tac-toe, strategy in this game is conceptually more difficult and has proven more challenging for computers.

A nd game (or nk game) is a generalization of the combinatorial game tic-tac-toe to higher dimensions. It is a game played on a nd hypercube with 2 players. If one player creates a line of length n of their symbol (X or O) they win the game. However, if all nd spaces are filled then the game is a draw. Tic-tac-toe is the game where n equals 3 and d equals 2 (3, 2). Qubic is the (4, 3) game. The (n > 0, 0) or (1, 1) games are trivially won by the first player as there is only one space (n0 = 1 and 11 = 1). A game with d = 1 and n > 1 cannot be won if both players are playing well as an opponent's piece will block the one-dimensional line.

A discrepancy game is a kind of positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by its set of positions/points/elements and a family of sets. It is played by two players, called Balancer and Unbalancer. Each player in turn picks an element. The goal of Balancer is to ensure that every set in is balanced, i.e., the elements in each set are distributed roughly equally between the players. The goal of Unbalancer is to ensure that at least one set is unbalanced.

A strong positional game is a kind of positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by its set of positions and its family of winning-sets. It is played by two players, called First and Second, who alternately take previously untaken positions.

A Waiter-Client game is a kind of positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by its set of positions/points/elements, and its family of winning-sets. It is played by two players, called Waiter and Client. Each round, Waiter picks two elements, Client chooses one element and Waiter gets the other element.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avoider-Enforcer game</span> Game where players avoid making losing-sets

An Avoider-Enforcer game is a kind of positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by a set of positions/points/elements and a family of subsets, which are called here the losing-sets. It is played by two players, called Avoider and Enforcer, who take turns picking elements until all elements are taken. Avoider wins if he manages to avoid taking a losing set; Enforcer wins if he manages to make Avoider take a losing set.

A biased positional game is a variant of a positional game. Like most positional games, it is described by a set of positions/points/elements and a family of subsets, which are usually called the winning-sets. It is played by two players who take turns picking elements until all elements are taken. While in the standard game each player picks one element per turn, in the biased game each player takes a different number of elements.

The clique game is a positional game where two players alternately pick edges, trying to occupy a complete clique of a given size.

In a positional game, a pairing strategy is a strategy that a player can use to guarantee victory, or at least force a draw. It is based on dividing the positions on the game-board into disjoint pairs. Whenever the opponent picks a position in a pair, the player picks the other position in the same pair.

Combinatorial Games: Tic-Tac-Toe Theory is a monograph on the mathematics of tic-tac-toe and other positional games, written by József Beck. It was published in 2008 by the Cambridge University Press as volume 114 of their Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications book series (ISBN 978-0-521-46100-9).

In mathematics, the Graham–Rothschild theorem is a theorem that applies Ramsey theory to combinatorics on words and combinatorial cubes. It is named after Ronald Graham and Bruce Lee Rothschild, who published its proof in 1971. Through the work of Graham, Rothschild, and Klaus Leeb in 1972, it became part of the foundations of structural Ramsey theory. A special case of the Graham–Rothschild theorem motivates the definition of Graham's number, a number that was popularized by Martin Gardner in Scientific American and listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the largest number ever appearing in a mathematical proof.

References

  1. Beck, József (2008). Combinatorial Games: Tic-Tac-Toe Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-46100-9.
  2. 1 2 Hefetz, Dan; Krivelevich, Michael; Stojaković, Miloš; Szabó, Tibor (2014). Positional Games. Oberwolfach Seminars. Vol. 44. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH. ISBN   978-3-0348-0824-8.