Proto-Hlai | |
---|---|
Reconstruction of | Hlai languages |
Region | Hainan |
Reconstructed ancestor |
Proto-Hlai is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hlai languages. Proto-Hlai reconstructions include those of Matisoff (1988), Thurgood (1991), Wu (2000), Ostapirat (2004), and Norquest (2007).
Peter K. Norquest (2007) reconstructs 29 basic Proto-Hlai consonants (Norquest 2007:135), while Weera Ostapirat reconstructs only 19 proto-consonants (Ostapirat 2007:145).
Labial | Alveolar | Postalveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plosive | voiceless | tɕ | k | ʔ | |||
voiceless aspirated | pʰ | tʰ | tʃʰ | tɕʰ | kʰ | ||
implosive | ɓ | ɗ | |||||
Fricative | voiceless | f | s | ||||
voiced | C-β | ɦ | |||||
Nasal | voiceless | m̥ | n̥ | ɲ̊ | ŋ̊ | ||
voiced | C-m | C-n | C-ɲ | C-ŋ | |||
Lateral | voiceless | ʰl | |||||
voiced | C-l | ||||||
Tap | ɾ | ||||||
Trill | r | ||||||
Approximant | voiceless | ʍ | ȷ̊ | ||||
voiced | ʋ |
Norquest additionally reconstructs six onsets suggesting consonant clusters: *pl,*fj,*lj,*ɾj,*tʃʰw,*ŋ̊w. Whether these were actual consonant clusters is not clear. The clusters with a glide as a second member may have been coarticulated consonants: palatalized *fʲ,*lʲ,*ɾʲ, labialized *tʃʰʷ,*ŋ̊ʷ, while *pl may have arisen from a sesquisyllable *p-l.
Norquest also reconstructs six bisyllabic root shapes:
Pretonic syllables are later lost in all Hlai languages, but in these six combinations, they trigger in some languages conditional developments of the tonic syllable's onset consonant, allowing them to be distinguished in reconstruction.
In Ostapirat's (2004) reconstruction, Proto-Hlai forms can be both monosyllabic and disyllabic. Some disyllabic forms have medial consonants beginning with three penultimate vowels (*u-, *i-, *a-; the last of which is default). Vowels can also combine with *-i or *-u to form diphthongs. Tones (*A, *B, *C, *D) are also reconstructed.
In the table below, Proto-Hlai consonants marked as green can occur at the end of syllables.
Labial | Labiodental | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar | Glottal or uvular | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | m | n | ɲ | ŋ | |||||||||
Plosive | voiceless | p | t | c | k | ʔ | |||||||
voiced | b | d | ɟ | ɡ | |||||||||
Fricative | s | ||||||||||||
Approximant | w | ʋ | l | j | |||||||||
Trill | r | ʀ |
Ostapirat (2004) reconstructs 5 vowels, which are /a, ə, i, ɨ, u/. Norquest reconstructs seven vowel qualities (Norquest 2007:238, 330).
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | *i*iː | *ɯ*ɯː | *u*uː |
Mid | *eː | *ə*əː | *o |
Open | *aː |
The short vowels *i, *ɯ, *u, *ə, *o and long *əː only appear in roots with a final consonant (Norquest 2007:330).
The transition from Pre-Hlai (the predecessor of the Proto-Hlai language ancestral to both Hlai and Jiamao) to Proto-Hlai involved the following series of sound changes (Norquest 2007:308). (Order follows that of the table of contents – not intended to be sequential)
Or, in the sequential order given in Norquest (2007:416–417), which excludes monophthongization:
After evolving from Pre-Hlai, Proto-Hlai initials went through 4 main types of sound changes (Norquest 2007:66).
After the breakup of Proto-Hlai, the following sound changes occurred in various Hlai branches.
The following table gives the reflexes of the onset consonants in the Hlai languages, as well as Norquest and Ostapirat's reconstructions:
Norquest | Ostapirat | Bouhin | Ha Em | Lauhut | Qi group | Cunhua | Nadouhua | Meifu group | Run group | Notes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tongzha | Zandui | Baoting | Changjiang | Moyfaw | Baisha | Yuanmen | |||||||||
*ɓ | *b | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ɓ | ||||||
*ɗ | *d | ɗ | ɗ | ɗ | ɗ | ɗ, ts | ɗ | ɗ | ɗ | ||||||
*tɕ | *ɟ | ts | ts | ts | ts | ts | ts | ts | ts | t | |||||
*k | *g | k | k | k | k | k | k | k | k | ||||||
*pʰ | *p | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | pʰ | ||||||
*tʰ | *t | tʰ | tʰ | tʰ | tʰ | tʰ, tsʰ | tʰ | tʰ | tʰ | ||||||
*kʰ | *k | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | kʰ | ||||||
*tɕʰ | *c | tsʰ | tsʰ | tsʰ | tsʰ | tsʰ | s | tsʰ | tsʰ | ||||||
*tʃʰ | *C-t | h | h | ||||||||||||
*tʃʰw | *Cut | f | f | f | f | f | pfʰ | ||||||||
*f | *C-p | pʰ | f | f | |||||||||||
*fj | *Cip | pʰ | f | s | s | A very rare correspondence set, with only one word ('tooth', *fjən) being reflected in both key languages, Cunhua and Changjiang. | |||||||||
*C-β | *Cup | p | f | f | f | kʷ | ɣ | f | |||||||
*s | *s | t | t | t | t | tθ | f | s | tsʰ | *s > t is a late areal change, shared also by the only distantly related Be language. | |||||
*ɦ | *C-k | h | h | h | h | h | h | h | h | ||||||
*m̥ | *C-m | m | p | p | p ↓ | pʰ ↓ | p ↓ | ɓ ↓ | p ↓ | p ↓ | p | p | p ↓ | In these correspondence sets, nasality is retained only in Bouhin. Norquest reconstructs prenasalized stops *mb, *nd, *ɲɟ, *ŋg as the proto-non-Bouhin intermediate stage. | |
*n̥ | *C-n | n | t | t | t ↓ | tʰ ↓ | t ↓ | ts ↓ | t ↓ | t ↓ | t | t | t ↓ | ||
*ɲ̊ | *C-ɲ | ɲ | ts | ts | ts ↓ | tsʰ ↓ | ts ↓ | ts ↓ | ts ↓ | ts ↓ | ts | ts | ts ↓ | ||
*ŋ̊ | *C-ŋ | ŋ | k | k | k ↓ | kʰ ↓ | k ↓ | k ↓ | k ↓ | k ↓ | k | k | k ↓ | ||
*C-m | *m | m | m | m | m | m ↓ | m | m | m | m | m | m ↓ | |||
*C-n | *n | n | n | n | n | n ↓ | n | n | n | n | n | n ↓ | |||
*C-ɲ | *ɲ | ɲ | ɲ | ɲ | ɲ | n ↓ | ɲ | ɲ | ŋʲ | ɲ | ɲ | ɲ ↓ | |||
*Ciɦ | *Cik | h | h | hʲ | z | z | hʲ | With rhinoglottophilia in Cunhua through Run: *Ciɦ > *(Ci)ɦj > *ʔɲ. | |||||||
*C-ŋ | *ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ ↓ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ | ŋ ↓ | |||
*Cuŋ | *ŋw | ŋʷ | ŋʷ | ŋ, ŋʷ | ŋʷ | ɱ ↓ | |||||||||
*Cuɦ | *Cuk | h | h | hʷ | gʷ | v | hʷ | ŋ, ŋʷ | Rhinoglottophilia in Cunhua through Run: *Cuɦ > *(Cu)ɦw > *ʔŋʷ. | ||||||
*l̥ | *C-l | ɗ | ɬ | ɬ | ɬ | tθ | l | ɬ | ɬ | ||||||
*C-l | *l | l | l | l | l | l ↓ | l | l | l | l | l | l ↓ | |||
*p-l | *p-l | pl | pl | p | pl | ɓ ↓, l ↓ | pʲ ↓ | p ↓ | pl | pl | |||||
*ɾ | *C-r | r | r | r | r ↓ | l ↓ | l ↓ | l ↓ | l ↓ | l ↓ | r | r | r ↓ | ||
*r | *C-ʀ | r | g | g | g ↓ | h ↓ | h ↓ | h ↓ | ŋ ↓ | g ↓ | x | x | kʰ | ||
*ʔ | *ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ʔ | ||||||
*Ciʔ | *Ciʔ | ʔʲ | z | z | ʔʲ | z | ʔʲ | z | z | These onsets (as well as *Ciɦ-, *Cuɦ- above) showing characteristic cheshirization outside of Bouhin and Ha Em. | |||||
*Cuʔ | *Cuʔ | ʔʷ | gʷ | v | ʔʷ | v | ʔʷ | kʷ | ɣ | v | |||||
*Cur | *Cuʀ | r | g | gʷ | gʷ ↓ | v ↓ | hʷ ↓ | v ↓ | ŋ ↓, v ↓ | kʷ | ɣ | v | |||
*Cuɾ | *Cur | r | r | v | f ↓ | v ↓ | v ↓ | f | f ↓ | ||||||
*ʋ | *C-ʋ | v | v | f ↓ | v ↓ | v | v ↓ | v | v | v ↓ | |||||
*ʍ | *Vw | hʷ | v ↓ | v | |||||||||||
*ŋ̊w | h ↓ | ŋ ↓, v ↓ | |||||||||||||
*ȷ̊ | *Vj | z | z | z | z ↓ | z ↓ | z | z | z ↓ | z ↓ | z | z | z ↓ | ||
*lj | *il | ɬ ↓ | l ↓ | ts ↓ | With *lj > *lʑ > *ɮ > ɬ in Qi (lowered tone still indicating earlier voicing). | ||||||||||
*ɾj | *Cir | z | z | r | t ↓ | tʰ ↓ | t ↓ | z ↓ | l ↓ | t ↓ | t | t, ts | t, ts ↓ |
The symbol ↓ indicates here a lowered tone on the following vowel in those Hlai languages where tone split has taken place; this normally occurs following earlier voiced consonants.
The Kra–Dai languages, are a language family in Mainland Southeast Asia, Southern China and Northeastern India. All languages in the family are tonal, including Thai and Lao, the national languages of Thailand and Laos, respectively. Around 93 million people speak Kra–Dai languages; 60% of those speak Thai. Ethnologue lists 95 languages in the family, with 62 of these being in the Tai branch.
Historical Chinese phonology deals with reconstructing the sounds of Chinese from the past. As Chinese is written with logographic characters, not alphabetic or syllabary, the methods employed in Historical Chinese phonology differ considerably from those employed in, for example, Indo-European linguistics; reconstruction is more difficult because, unlike Indo-European languages, no phonetic spellings were used.
The Kam–Tai languages, also called Dong–Tai or Zhuang–Dong in China, are a proposed primary branch of the Kra–Dai language family. However, since the 2000s in China, the names Dong–Tai and Zhuang–Dong have been used to refer to the entire Kra–Dai language family, including the Kra languages, due to the extensive documentation and comparative work done on Kra languages in China starting from the 2000s.
The phonology of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) has been reconstructed by linguists, based on the similarities and differences among current and extinct Indo-European languages. Because PIE was not written, linguists must rely on the evidence of its earliest attested descendants, such as Hittite, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and Latin, to reconstruct its phonology.
The Austro-Tai languages, sometimes also Austro-Thai languages, are a proposed language family that comprises the Austronesian languages and the Kra–Dai languages.
The Kra languages are a branch of the Kra–Dai language family spoken in southern China and in northern Vietnam.
Jiamao is a divergent Kra-Dai language or possible language isolate spoken in southern Hainan, China. Jiamao speakers' autonym is 1.
The Hlai languages are a primary branch of the Kra–Dai language family spoken in the mountains of central and south-central Hainan in China by the Hlai people, not to be confused with the colloquial name for the Leizhou branch of Min Chinese. They include Cun, whose speakers are ethnically distinct. A quarter of Hlai speakers are monolingual. None of the Hlai languages had a writing system until the 1950s, when the Latin script was adopted for Ha.
Be, also known as Ong Be, Bê, or Vo Limgao, is a pair of languages spoken by 600,000 people, 100,000 of them monolingual, on the north-central coast of Hainan Island, including the suburbs of the provincial capital Haikou. The speakers are counted as part of the Han Chinese nationality in census. According to Ethnologue, it is taught in primary schools.
Proto-Tai is the reconstructed proto-language of all the Tai languages, including modern Lao, Shan, Tai Lü, Tai Dam, Ahom, Northern Thai, Standard Thai, Bouyei, and Zhuang. The Proto-Tai language is not directly attested by any surviving texts, but has been reconstructed using the comparative method.
Proto-Hmong–Mien (PHM), also known as Proto-Miao–Yao, is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hmong–Mien languages. Lower-level reconstructions include Proto-Hmongic and Proto-Mienic.
Proto-Kra is the reconstructed ancestor of the Kra languages. It was reconstructed in 2000 by Weera Ostapirat in his Ph.D. dissertation.
Scholars have attempted to reconstruct the phonology of Old Chinese from documentary evidence. Although the writing system does not describe sounds directly, shared phonetic components of the most ancient Chinese characters are believed to link words that were pronounced similarly at that time. The oldest surviving Chinese verse, in the Classic of Poetry (Shijing), shows which words rhymed in that period. Scholars have compared these bodies of contemporary evidence with the much later Middle Chinese reading pronunciations listed in the Qieyun rime dictionary published in 601 AD, though this falls short of a phonemic analysis. Supplementary evidence has been drawn from cognates in other Sino-Tibetan languages and in Min Chinese, which split off before the Middle Chinese period, Chinese transcriptions of foreign names, and early borrowings from and by neighbouring languages such as Hmong–Mien, Tai and Tocharian languages.
The East Asian languages are a language family proposed by Stanley Starosta in 2001. The proposal has since been adopted by George van Driem and others.
Proto-Kam–Sui is the reconstructed ancestor of the Kam–Sui languages.
Proto-Kra–Dai is the proposed reconstructed ancestor of the Kra–Dai languages.
Proto-Karenic or Proto-Karen is the reconstructed ancestor of the Karenic languages.
Peter K. Norquest is an American linguist who specializes in Kra–Dai historical linguistics.
Proto-Mienic or Proto-Yao is the reconstructed ancestor of the Mienic languages.
Proto-Hmongic or Proto-Miao is the reconstructed ancestor of the Hmongic languages.