Public Service Loan Forgiveness

Last updated

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program is a United States government program that was created under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 signed into law by President George W. Bush to provide indebted professionals a way out of their federal student loan debt burden by working full-time in public service. [1]

Contents

The program permits Direct Loan borrowers who make 120 qualifying monthly payments under a qualifying repayment plan, while working full-time for a qualifying employer, to have the remainder of their balance forgiven. [2] The earliest time in which borrowers could receive forgiveness under the program was after October 1, 2017. The Department of Education reported that 2,215 borrowers had the remainder of their respective student loans forgiven under the program as of April 30, 2020 for a denial rate of 98.5%. [3]

The PSLF program has received criticism and has been the subject of litigation by loan-holders trying to discharge their student loans.

Qualifying employers

Government organizations or agencies (federal, state or local), 501(c)(3) organizations as defined by the IRS, [4] and some other types of not-for-profit organizations providing designated public services qualify for PSLF.

The nature of the individual's job responsibilities is not a determining factor in whether the employment qualifies. Rather, only the employer's status as a qualifying employer determines whether the employment qualifies.

With limited exception, the individual must be directly employed by the qualifying employer. Therefore, government contractors will not qualify on the basis of their government contracts. Instead, they must independently be a qualifying employer. Another example is the national labs. Employees at national labs such as a Department of Energy or National Nuclear Security Administration Lab, do not qualify on the basis of managing a lab for the government; rather, the managing entity of the lab must be a qualifying employer.

Eligible loans

Any loan made under the Direct Loan Program can qualify for PSLF. In particular, Subsidized and Unsubsidized Stafford Loans, PLUS Loans, and Federal Direct Consolidation Loans qualify for PSLF.

Loans in the FFEL program or Federal Perkins Loans can be consolidated into a Direct Consolidation Loan to become eligible for the program. [5] Private student loans are ineligible to be consolidated into a Direct Loan and thus cannot be discharged under the PSLF program.

Qualifying for forgiveness

An individual qualifies for PSLF after making 120 on-time, monthly payments under a qualifying repayment plan while working full-time for a qualifying employer. After the borrower has made 120 qualifying payments, any remaining balance of the borrower's eligible student loan is forgiven without any tax implications. Currently, there is no cap as to the amount of forgiveness a borrower can receive.

Those interested in receiving PSLF should regularly submit the "Employment Certification Form" for PSLF. This form will be used by the Department of Education's contractor, Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri (MOHELA), (formerly FedLoan Servicing), to determine whether an individual's employment and payments qualify for the program. [6]

Qualifying payment plans

Multiple plans are available to those interested in the PSLF program. Those wishing to seek forgiveness under the PSLF should make payments under one of the income-driven repayment plans, including Income Contingent Repayment, Income Based Repayment, Pay As You Earn, or Revised Pay As You Earn.

On May 23, 2018, the U.S. Department of Education announced a second-chance plan for people in public service jobs who were denied loan forgiveness because they chose the wrong repayment plan. The DoED will use $350 million set aside by Congress in a fix-it fund to help people seeking reconsideration. The money will be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis. [7]

Problems with the program

The earliest date that public servants could qualify for full cancelation of their loans was October 1, 2017, ten years after PSLF existed. Problems soon emerged. Of the first 28,000 public servants who applied for forgiveness, only 96 were approved. [8] This is a denial rate of 99 percent. In March 2018 Congress attempted to fix PSLF by passing the Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness program (TEPSLF). According to a Government Accountability Office report of the 54,184 who applied for TEPSLF 53,523 got denied. [9] These denials are the result of many problems, including servicers who provided false or misleading information about whether an account had the right loan type and payment plan to qualify for PSLF. [10] On October 6, 2021, the Biden administration announced a temporary waiver allowing past payments to qualify even if they had the wrong loan type or payment plan. [11] As of March 2022 100,000 people have had over $6.2 billion of student loans canceled as a result of the waiver, [12] however, many problems still persist. The government estimates that 1.3 million public servants qualify for PSLF. [13] FedLoan Servicing continues to incorrectly tell people that they do not qualify for PSLF when in fact they do. [14] FedLoan has also been sending automated messages with inaccurate payment counts. The CFPB has issued a warning to FedLoan. [13] The Department of Education's PSLF help tool will not allow people to select that they have made over 120 payments, forcing people to fill out the form with inaccurate information or find workarounds. Applicants who have reached 120 qualified payments have reported long processing delays of three months or more after submitting PSLF forms to loan servicer, Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri.

Future reduction proposals

For his 2015 budget proposal to Congress, President Barack Obama proposed capping Public Service Loan Forgiveness at $57,500 for all new borrowers. [15] Analysis at the website Educated Risk, however, details the difficulty of modifying PSLF: [16]

The 2016 Republican budget resolution proposed to eliminate the PSLF program to all new student loan borrowers. [17] [18] A recent GAO report found that the cost of loan forgiveness has been underestimated, leading many commentators to speculate that a new Republican administration and Congress will take steps to curb the problem. [19]

President Donald Trump proposed eliminating the PSLF in his 2018 budget proposal. Similarly, the Republican-proposed PROSPER Act would have eliminated the PSLF. Any changes would have only applied to new borrowers as of July 1, 2019. [20] The PROSPER Act is considered "dead" with Democrats retaking control of the House of Representatives in 2019. [21]

President Trump's 2019 budget proposed eliminating the PSLF. The elimination would have only affected new borrowers as of July 1, 2020. [22] Trump's 2021 fiscal budget made a similar proposal that would only apply to new borrowers. [23]

Contradictory claims by the government regarding eligibility and litigation

In December 2016, it was reported that some employees who had been previously told by the government that their jobs were eligible for the program were later told that their jobs were not eligible. [24] In response, the American Bar Association joined four individual plaintiffs who were denied eligibility under PSLF in a lawsuit against the United States Department of Education to stop the department's decision to retroactively refuse to honor loan forgiveness commitments it made to individuals who "have dedicated their careers to public service." [25] The ABA argued the Department of Education "substantially changed its policy on PSLF-eligible employers" which directly contradicts statutory procedures for modifying regulations requiring public notice and comment periods. [26] On February 22, 2019, a New York federal district court found the Department of Education's actions "arbitrary and capricious." The court found: "In adopting the new standards, the Department failed to display awareness of its changed position, provide a reasoned analysis for that decision and take into account the serious reliance interests affected." [27] The court vacated the department's denial letters and remanded the matters to the Department of Education for reconsideration. [28] Such ruling could lay the groundwork for borrowers who were denied loan forgiveness after being told they were eligible to appeal. [27] The court classified the department's position as "nonsense". The department elected not to appeal the ruling. [29] The Department of Education subsequently stated that all full-time ABA employees are employed in "a public service job" for a "public service organization" as part of a settlement between the ABA and the department. [30] The Education Department further stated that its decision does not restrict the agency from changing the definition of a public service organization in new regulations in the future.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student loan</span> Type of loan for educational expenses

A student loan is a type of loan designed to help students pay for post-secondary education and the associated fees, such as tuition, books and supplies, and living expenses. It may differ from other types of loans in the fact that the interest rate may be substantially lower and the repayment schedule may be deferred while the student is still in school. It also differs in many countries in the strict laws regulating renegotiating and bankruptcy. This article highlights the differences of the student loan system in several major countries.

A Federal Perkins Loan, also referred to as a Perkins Loan, was a need-based student loan offered by U.S. Department of Education from 1958 until 2017. Created as part of the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, the Perkins Loan served to assist American college students fund their post-secondary education. The program was named after Carl D. Perkins, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Kentucky.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higher Education Act of 1965</span> U.S. law establishing a student loan program

The Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA) was legislation signed into United States law on November 8, 1965, as part of President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society domestic agenda. Johnson chose Texas State University, his alma mater, as the signing site. The law was intended "to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education". It increased federal money given to universities, created scholarships, gave low-interest loans for students, and established a National Teachers Corps. The "financial assistance for students" is covered in Title IV of the HEA.

The Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program was a system of private student loans which were subsidized and guaranteed by the United States federal government. The program issued loans from 1965 until it was ended in 2010. Similar loans are now provided under the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, which are federal loans issued directly by the United States Department of Education.

The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program provides "low-interest loans for students and parents to help pay for the cost of a student's education after high school. The lender is the U.S. Department of Education ... rather than a bank or other financial institution." It is the largest single source of federal financial aid for students and their parents pursuing post-secondary education and for many it is the first financial obligation they incur, leaving them with debt to be paid over a period of time that can be a decade or more as the average student takes 19.4 years. The program is named after William D. Ford, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Michigan.

The Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missouri, also known as the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority or MOHELA is one of the largest holders and servicers of student loans in the United States. Its headquarters are in St. Louis, Missouri.

Government sponsored Student Loans in Canada was designed to help post-secondary students pay for their education in Canada. The federal government funds the Canada Student Loan Program (CSLP) and the provinces may fund their own programs or be integrated with the CSLP. In addition, Canadian banks offer commercial loans targeted for students in professional programs.

Student loans and grants in the United Kingdom are primarily provided by the government through the Student Loans Company (SLC), an executive non-departmental public body. The SLC is responsible for Student Finance England and Student Finance Wales, and is a delivery partner of Student Finance NI and the Student Awards Agency for Scotland. Most undergraduate university students resident in the United Kingdom are eligible for student loans, and some students on teacher training courses may also apply for loans. Student loans also became available from the 2016/17 academic year to postgraduate students who study a taught Masters, research or Doctoral course.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student loans in the United States</span> Loans incurred to pay for higher education

In the United States, student loans are a form of financial aid intended to help students access higher education. In 2018, 70 percent of higher education graduates had used loans to cover some or all of their expenses. With notable exceptions, student loans must be repaid, in contrast to other forms of financial aid such as scholarships, which are not repaid, and grants, which rarely have to be repaid. Student loans may be discharged through bankruptcy, but this is difficult. Research shows that access to student loans increases credit-constrained students' degree completion, later-life earnings, and student loan repayment while having no impact on overall debt.

The Voluntary Flexible Agreement (VFA) was created by the United States Congress in 1998 during a reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965. The VFA enables Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) guarantors to develop programs and techniques to help borrowers avoid student-loan default and all of its negative consequences. The VFA objective is experimentation for the purpose of finding the best practices, collecting long-term data, and sharing results in order to determine what benefits schools, students, the federal government, and the American taxpayer. [1]

Income-based repayment or income-driven-repayment (IDR) is a student loan repayment program in the United States that regulates the amount that one needs to pay each month based on one's current income and family size.

We Can't Wait is a policy initiative launched by the U.S. President Barack Obama's administration in October 2011 to institute policies by executive orders, administrative rulemaking, and recess appointments. The initiative was developed in response to the United States Congress' unwillingness to pass economic legislation proposed by Obama, and conflicts in Congress during the 2011 debt ceiling crisis.

Pay As You Earn (PAYE) is a federal student loan relief program signed into law on December 21, 2012, by President Barack Obama. It is one of four income-driven repayment plans.

Navient Corporation is an American student loan servicer based in Wilmington, Delaware. Managing nearly $300 billion in student loans for more than 12 million debtors, the company was formed in 2014 by the split of Sallie Mae into two distinct entities: Sallie Mae Bank and Navient. Navient employs 6,000 people at offices across the U.S. As of 2018, Navient services 25% of student loans in the United States.

<i>American Bar Association v. United States Department of Education</i> 2016 United States district court case

American Bar Association v. United States Department of Education, 370 F. Supp. 3d 1, was a case filed in December 2016 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that reached its final resolution in February 2020, in which the ABA and four individual public interest lawyers succeeded in preventing the United States Department of Education from denying individuals employed by certain "public service organizations" eligibility to participate in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. Following an initial victory on summary judgment for three of the individual plaintiffs in the district court's February 2019 ruling, the ABA and the fourth individual plaintiff settled the outstanding issues with the department. As a result, the four individual plaintiffs and all employees of the ABA, as well as other similarly situated individuals, are eligible to participate in the PSLF program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paycheck Protection Program</span> U.S. federal government business loan program

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) is a $953-billion business loan program established by the United States federal government during the Trump administration in 2020 through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act to help certain businesses, self-employed workers, sole proprietors, certain nonprofit organizations, and tribal businesses continue paying their workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal aid during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada</span> National economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic

The Government of Canada introduced multiple temporary social security and financial aid programs in response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. The initial CA$82-billion aid package was announced on March 18, 2020 by Justin Trudeau.

The Student Borrower Protection Center is a nonprofit organization aimed at protecting borrowers of student loans and improving the student loan system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higher Education Relief Opportunities For Students Act</span> 2002 United States law

The Higher Education Relief Opportunities For Students (HEROES) Act was legislation passed unanimously by the United States Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 15, 2002. It was extended and amended in 2003, extended in 2005, and made permanent in 2007.

Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. 477 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the forgiveness of federal student loans by the Biden administration in 2022, challenged by multiple states. The Supreme Court's ruling was issued on June 30, 2023, ruling 6–3 that the Secretary of Education did not have the power to waive student loans under the HEROES Act.

References

  1. ↑ Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  110–84 (text) (PDF), 121  Stat.   784
  2. ↑ "Public Service Loan Forgiveness Data". studentaid.ed.gov. Archived from the original on November 12, 2019. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  3. ↑ Friedman, Zack (June 2, 2020). "Why 147,000 People Were Rejected For Student Loan Forgiveness". Forbes .
  4. ↑ "Charities and Nonprofits". www.irs.gov. Internal Revenue Service. September 13, 2021. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  5. ↑ "Public Service Loan Forgiveness". Federal Student Aid office of the United States Department of Education. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  6. ↑ "Form" (PDF). studentaid.ed.gov. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  7. ↑ "Public service workers denied loan forgiveness due to wrong repayment plan given second chance". ABA Journal . Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  8. ↑ Cowley, Stacy (September 27, 2018). "28,000 Public Servants Sought Student Loan Forgiveness. 96 Got It". The New York Times.
  9. ↑ "Public Service Loan Forgiveness: Improving the Temporary Expanded Process Could Help Reduce Borrower Confusion". September 20, 2022.
  10. ↑ "CFPB Spotlights Borrower Complaints About Student Loan Servicers Mishandling Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program". June 22, 2017.
  11. ↑ "PSLF Waiver Offers Way to Get Closer to Loan Forgiveness". Federal Student Aid. United States Department of Education . Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  12. ↑ "Biden Administration Says 100,000 Borrowers Now Qualify for Student Loan Forgiveness". Forbes .
  13. 1 2 "CFPB Steps up Scrutiny of Student Loan Servicers That Deceive Borrowers About Public Service Loan Forgiveness". February 18, 2022.
  14. ↑ "Borrowers say they were wrongly denied loan forgiveness. Now, help is on the way". NPR.org.
  15. ↑ Mitchell, Josh (March 4, 2014). "2015 Budget: White House Proposes Broader Debt Forgiveness for Students". Wall Street Journal . Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  16. ↑ "Is Public Service Loan Forgiveness For Real?". Archived from the original on March 22, 2014.
  17. ↑ Gale, Rebecca (April 22, 2015). "Student Loan Forgiveness for Staff on Chopping Block". Roll Call. Archived from the original on April 25, 2015. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
  18. ↑ "REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO ACCOMPANY H. Con. Res. 27" (PDF). House of Representatives. March 20, 2015. p. 115. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 28, 2015. Retrieved April 28, 2015. actions taken by the committee of jurisdiction to streamline, reform, and simplify the current system could include ending the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program.
  19. ↑ Berman, Jillian (November 30, 2016). "Feds may have underestimated cost of student loan forgiveness". Archived from the original on December 1, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2017.
  20. ↑ Bond, Casey (May 18, 2018). "8 Ways You Can Quit Paying Your Student Loans (Legally)". Huffington Post. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  21. ↑ "The Democrats Retake the House; Now What for Higher Ed?". jamesgmartin.center. November 14, 2018. Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  22. ↑ Friedman, Zack. "Trump Proposes To End Student Loan Forgiveness Program". Forbes.
  23. ↑ Minsky, Adam S. "Trump Proposes Repealing Public Service Loan Forgiveness — Can He Do That?". Forbes.
  24. ↑ "They Thought They Qualified for Student Loan Forgiveness. Years Later, the Government Changes Its Mind". The New York Times . December 20, 2016.
  25. ↑ "ABA sues Department of Education over retroactive denials to lawyers under Public Service Loan Forgiveness". December 20, 2016.
  26. ↑ Adams, Rick (November 2, 2017). "Decision may be near in ABA suit to enforce PSLF promises". ABA for Law Students. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  27. 1 2 Douglas-Gabriel, Danielle (February 26, 2019). "This court ruling could have big implications for public-service loan forgiveness". The Washington Post .
  28. ↑ Berman, Jillian (February 26, 2019). "Public-interest lawyers who sued over student-loan forgiveness are one step closer". MarketWatch. Retrieved March 2, 2019.
  29. ↑ "In about-face, several ABA employees are told they qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness". ABA Journal.
  30. ↑ "All full-time ABA employees are eligible for federal loan forgiveness program after litigation settles". ABA Journal.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.