Radioactive scrap metal

Last updated October 17, 2024

Radioactive scrap metal is created when radioactive material enters the metal recycling process and contaminates scrap metal.

Overview

A "lost source accident"^[1]^[2] occurs when a radioactive object is lost or stolen. Such objects may appear in the scrap metal industry if people mistake them for harmless bits of metal.^[3] The International Atomic Energy Agency has provided guides for scrap metal collectors on what a sealed source might look like.^[4]^[5] The best known example of this type of event is the Goiânia accident, in Brazil.

While some lost-source accidents have not involved the scrap metal industry, they are good examples of the likely scale and scope of a lost-source accident. For example, the Red Army left sources behind in Didi Lilo, Georgia.^[6]

Another case occurred at Yanango where an ¹⁹²Ir radiography source was lost and at Gilan, Iran a radiography source harmed a welder.^[7]

Radioactive sources have a wide range of uses in medicine and industry, and it is common for the design (and nature) of a source to be tailored to the specific application. Hence, it is impossible to state with confidence what the "typical" source looks like or contains. For instance, antistatic devices include beta and alpha emitters: polonium containing devices have been used to eliminate static electricity in such devices as paint spraying equipment.^[8] An overview of the gamma sources used for radiography can be seen at Radiographic equipment, and it is reasonable to consider this to be a good overview of small to moderate gamma sources.

Notable incidents

1930s and 1940s – In the US, gold which was contaminated with radioactive lead-210 entered the jewelry industry after a person in upstate New York melted gold seeds used in brachytherapy that had originally contained radon-222. By the 1960s, health officials had reported cases of skin damage and cancer in people who had worn contaminated rings. A 1981 investigation by the state identified at least 177 contaminated pieces of jewelry worn by 127 people throughout the state and in northwestern Pennsylvania, of which nine had developed cancer and 41 had a non-cancerous skin disease linked to radiation.^[9]
1982 – In northern Taiwan, a Cobalt-60 source was recycled with steel into rebar and used in the construction of apartment buildings, principally in Taipei from 1982 through 1984. Over 2,000 apartment units and shops were suspected as having been built using the material.^[10] About 10,000 people are believed to have been exposed to long-term low-level irradiation as a result.^[11] In the summer of 1992, a utility worker for the Taiwanese state-run electric utility Taipower brought a Geiger counter to his apartment to learn more about the device, and discovered that his apartment was contaminated.^[11] Despite awareness of the problem, owners of some of the buildings known to be contaminated have continued to rent apartments to tenants (in part because selling the units is illegal). Some research has shown that the radiation has had a "beneficial" effect upon the health of the tenants based on the death rate from cancers,^[12] Another study looking at the incidence of cancer found that although the overall risk of cancer was sharply reduced (SIR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.5 – 0.7), the incidence of certain leukemias in men (n = 6, SIR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 – 7.4) and thyroid cancer in women (n = 6, SIR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.0 – 5.7) were more prevalent. ^[13]^[14]

December 1983 – Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. A local resident salvaged materials from a discarded radiation therapy machine containing 6,010 pellets of cobalt-60. Transport of the material led to severe contamination of his truck. When the truck was scrapped, it contaminated another 5,000 metric tonnes of steel to an estimated 300 Ci (11 TBq) of activity. This steel was used to manufacture kitchen and restaurant table legs and rebar, some of which was shipped to the US and Canada. The incident was discovered months later when a truck delivering contaminated steel building materials to the Los Alamos National Laboratory drove into the facility through a radiation monitoring station intended to detect radiation leaving the facility. Contamination was later measured on roads used to transport the original damaged radiation source. Some pellets were found embedded in the roadway. In the state of Sinaloa, 109 houses were condemned due to use of contaminated building material. This incident prompted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Customs Service to install radiation detection equipment at all major border crossings.^[15]
September 1987 – Goiânia accident in Brazil; four people died from caesium radiation poisoning during their search for scrap metal, and 249 other people had significant radiation exposure.
May 1998 – Recycler Acerinox in Cádiz, Spain, unwittingly melted scrap metal containing caesium-137; the radioactive cloud drifted to Switzerland before being detected.^[16] (See Acerinox accident.)
January 2000 – At Samut Prakarn, a 15.7 TBq (420 Ci ) cobalt-60 teletherapy source was stolen and sold as scrap,^[17] and attempts were made by scrap metal workers to recycle the metal. Three people died, and thousands of others were exposed to radiation. It was found that at the edge of the scrap yard, the dose rate was about 1 to 10 mSv·h⁻¹.^{[ further explanation needed ]} The exact location of the source in the scrap yard was determined using a fluorescent screen which acted as a scintillator; this device was held on the end of a long pole.
July 2010 – During a routine inspection at the Port of Genoa, on Italy's northwest coast, a cargo container from Saudi Arabia containing nearly 23 000 kg of scrap copper was detected to be emitting gamma radiation at a rate of around 500 mSv/h. After spending over a year in quarantine on Port grounds, Italian officials dissected the container using robots and discovered a rod of cobalt-60 23 cm long and 0.8 cm in diameter intermingled with the scrap. Officials suspected its provenance to be inappropriately disposed of medical or food-processing equipment. The rod was sent to Germany for further analysis, after which it was likely to be recycled.^[18]
May 2013 – A batch of metal-studded belts sold by online retailer ASOS.com were confiscated and held in a US radioactive storage facility after testing positive for cobalt-60.^[19]

Physical and chemical compositions

The cleanup operation for the Goiânia accident ^[20] was difficult both because the source containment had been opened, and the radioactive material was water-soluble.

In 1983, a different incident in Mexico wherein cobalt-60 was spilled in an otherwise similar exposure led to a very different pattern of contamination, since the cobalt in such a source is normally in the form of cobalt metal alloyed with some nickel to improve the mechanical properties of the radioactive metal. If such a source is abused, then the cobalt metal fragments do not tend to dissolve in water or become very mobile. If a cobalt or iridium source is lost at a ferrous metal scrapyard then it is often the case that the source will enter a furnace, the radioactive metal will melt and contaminate the steel from this furnace. In Mexico, some buildings have been demolished because of the level of cobalt-60 in the steel used to make them. Also, some of the steel which was rendered radioactive in the Mexican event was used to make legs for 1400 tables.^[15]

Source melting

In the case of some high-value scrap metals it is possible to decontaminate the material, but this is best done long before the metal goes to a scrap yard.^[21]^[22]

Ferrous scrap

In the case of a caesium source being melted in an electric arc furnace used for steel scrap, it is more likely that the caesium will contaminate the fly ash or dust from the furnace, while radium is likely to stay in the ash or slag. The United States Environmental Protection Agency provides data about the fate of different contaminating elements in a scrap furnace.^[23] Four different fates for the element exist: the element can stay in the metal (as with cobalt and ruthenium); the element can enter the slag (as in lanthanides, actinides and radium); the element can enter the furnace dust or fly ash (as with caesium), which accounts for around 5%; or the element can leave the furnace and pass through the baghouse to enter the air (as with iodine).

Aluminium scrap

It is normal to place silicon, aluminium scrap and flux in a furnace. This is heated to form molten aluminium. From the furnace three main streams are obtained, metal product, dross (metal oxides and halides which are skimmed off the molten metal product) and off gases which go to the baghouse. The cooled waste gasses are then allowed out into the environment.

Copper scrap

It is normal that good-quality scrap copper, such as that from a nuclear plant, is refined in one furnace before being refined further in an electrochemical process. The furnace generates impure metal, slag, dust and gases. The dust accumulates in a baghouse, while the gases are vented to the atmosphere. The impure metal from the furnace may be further refined in an electrochemical process.

If the copper refinery includes an electrochemical process after the furnace, then unwanted elements are removed from the impure metal and deposited as anode slime.

The fates of different elements present in copper scrap which is melted in a furnace and then electrorefined. The average of the two extremes is shown and the error bars indicate the possible limits. The elements in the scrap end up in different proportions in the refined copper metal, the slag, the baghouse dust, the exhaust gases that leave the plant via the stack, or the anode slime Dirtycopperwholescrap.png — The fates of different elements present in copper scrap which is melted in a furnace and then electrorefined. The average of the two extremes is shown and the error bars indicate the possible limits. The elements in the scrap end up in different proportions in the refined copper metal, the slag, the baghouse dust, the exhaust gases that leave the plant via the stack, or the anode slime

Related Research Articles

A dirty bomb or radiological dispersal device is a radiological weapon that combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. The purpose of the weapon is to contaminate the area around the dispersal agent/conventional explosion with radioactive material, serving primarily as an area denial device against civilians. It is not to be confused with a nuclear explosion, such as a fission bomb, which produces blast effects far in excess of what is achievable by the use of conventional explosives. Unlike the cloud of radiation from a typical fission bomb, a dirty bomb's radiation can be dispersed only within a few hundred meters or a few miles of the explosion.

A cobalt bomb is a type of "salted bomb": a nuclear weapon designed to produce enhanced amounts of radioactive fallout, intended to contaminate a large area with radioactive material, potentially for the purpose of radiological warfare, mutual assured destruction or as doomsday devices. There is no firm evidence that such a device has ever been built or tested.

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, or a reactor core melt. The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

Radioactive contamination, also called radiological pollution, is the deposition of, or presence of radioactive substances on surfaces or within solids, liquids, or gases, where their presence is unintended or undesirable.

The Goiânia accident was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on September 13, 1987, in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, after an unsecured radiotherapy source was stolen from an abandoned hospital site in the city. It was subsequently handled by many people, resulting in four deaths. About 112,000 people were examined for radioactive contamination and 249 of them were found to have been contaminated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cobalt-60</span> Radioactive isotope of cobalt

Cobalt-60 (⁶⁰Co) is a synthetic radioactive isotope of cobalt with a half-life of 5.2714 years. It is produced artificially in nuclear reactors. Deliberate industrial production depends on neutron activation of bulk samples of the monoisotopic and mononuclidic cobalt isotope ⁵⁹
Co. Measurable quantities are also produced as a by-product of typical nuclear power plant operation and may be detected externally when leaks occur. In the latter case the incidentally produced ⁶⁰
Co is largely the result of multiple stages of neutron activation of iron isotopes in the reactor's steel structures via the creation of its ⁵⁹
Co precursor. The simplest case of the latter would result from the activation of ⁵⁸
Fe. ⁶⁰
Co undergoes beta decay to the stable isotope nickel-60. The activated cobalt nucleus emits two gamma rays with energies of 1.17 and 1.33 MeV, hence the overall equation of the nuclear reaction is: ⁵⁹
₂₇Co + n → ⁶⁰
₂₇Co → ⁶⁰
₂₈Ni + e⁻ + 2 γ

Radionuclides which emit gamma radiation are valuable in a range of different industrial, scientific and medical technologies. This article lists some common gamma-emitting radionuclides of technological importance, and their properties.

Caesium-137, cesium-137 (US), or radiocaesium, is a radioactive isotope of caesium that is formed as one of the more common fission products by the nuclear fission of uranium-235 and other fissionable isotopes in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. Trace quantities also originate from spontaneous fission of uranium-238. It is among the most problematic of the short-to-medium-lifetime fission products. Caesium-137 has a relatively low boiling point of 671 °C (1,240 °F) and easily becomes volatile when released suddenly at high temperature, as in the case of the Chernobyl nuclear accident and with atomic explosions, and can travel very long distances in the air. After being deposited onto the soil as radioactive fallout, it moves and spreads easily in the environment because of the high water solubility of caesium's most common chemical compounds, which are salts. Caesium-137 was discovered by Glenn T. Seaborg and Margaret Melhase.

Environmental radioactivity is part of the overall background radiation and is produced by radioactive materials in the human environment. While some radioisotopes, such as strontium-90 (⁹⁰Sr) and technetium-99 (⁹⁹Tc), are only found on Earth as a result of human activity, and some, like potassium-40 (⁴⁰K), are only present due to natural processes, a few isotopes, such as tritium (³H), result from both natural processes and human activities. The concentration and location of some natural isotopes, particularly uranium-238 (²³⁸U), can be affected by human activity, such as nuclear weapons testing, which caused a global fallout, with up to 2.4 million deaths by 2020.

Industrial radiography is a modality of non-destructive testing that uses ionizing radiation to inspect materials and components with the objective of locating and quantifying defects and degradation in material properties that would lead to the failure of engineering structures. It plays an important role in the science and technology needed to ensure product quality and reliability. In Australia, industrial radiographic non-destructive testing is colloquially referred to as "bombing" a component with a "bomb".

This article compares the radioactivity release and decay from the Chernobyl disaster with various other events which involved a release of uncontrolled radioactivity.

The Acerinox accident was a radioactive contamination accident in the province of Cádiz. In May 1998, a caesium-137 source managed to pass through the monitoring equipment in an Acerinox scrap metal reprocessing plant in Los Barrios, Spain. When melted, the caesium-137 caused the release of a radioactive cloud. The Acerinox chimney detectors failed to detect it, but it was eventually detected in France, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. The activity concentrations measured were up to 1000 times higher than normal background levels, although the absolute values recorded are still regarded as negligible in terms of radiation protection.

Mayapuri is an industrial locality in the West Delhi district of Delhi, India. It used to be a major hub of heavy metal and small-scale industries, but following government sanctions, most of the heavy metal industries moved out. The place is now a combination of light metal factories, scrap markets, and automobile service stations. In 2010, a major radiation accident took place in the scrap yards of Mayapuri.

The 1990 Clinic of Zaragoza radiotherapy accident was a radiological accident that occurred from 10 to 20 December 1990, at University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa of Zaragoza, in Aragon, Spain.

Between March and July 1962, a radiation incident in Mexico City occurred when a ten-year-old boy took home an industrial radiography source that was not contained in its proper shielding. Five individuals received significant doses of radiation from the 200-gigabecquerel cobalt-60 capsule, four of whom died.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samut Prakan radiation accident</span> 2000 radiation accident in Thailand

A radiation accident occurred in Samut Prakan Province, Thailand in January–February 2000. The accident happened when an insecurely stored unlicensed cobalt-60 radiation source was recovered by scrap metal collectors who, together with a scrapyard worker, subsequently dismantled the container, unknowingly exposing themselves and others nearby to ionizing radiation. Over the following weeks, those exposed developed symptoms of radiation sickness and eventually sought medical attention. The Office of Atomic Energy for Peace (OAEP), Thailand's nuclear regulatory agency, was notified when doctors came to suspect radiation injury, some 17 days after the initial exposure. The OAEP sent an emergency response team to locate and contain the radiation source, which was estimated to have an activity of 15.7 terabecquerels (420 Ci), and was eventually traced to its owner. Investigations found failure to ensure secure storage of the radiation source to be the root cause of the accident, which resulted in ten people being hospitalized for radiation injury, three of whom died, as well as the potentially significant exposure of 1,872 people.

A radioactive source is a known quantity of a radionuclide which emits ionizing radiation, typically one or more of the radiation types gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, and neutron radiation.

A radioactive contamination incident occurred in 1984 in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, originating from a radiation therapy unit purchased by a private medical company and subsequently dismantled for lack of personnel to operate it. The radioactive material, cobalt-60, ended up in a junkyard, where it was sold to foundries that inadvertently melted it with other metals and produced about 6,000 tons of contaminated rebar. These were distributed in 17 Mexican states and several cities in the United States. It is estimated that 4,000 people were exposed to radiation as a result of this incident.

References

↑ P Ortiz, V Friedrich, J Wheatley and M Oresegun, Lost & Found Dangers - Orphan Radiation Sources Raise Global Concerns Archived 2011-07-09 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA Bulletin 41: 18 (1999)
↑ Greta Joy Dicus, USA Perspectives - Safety & Security of Radioactive Sources Archived 2011-07-09 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA Bulletin 41: 22 (1999)
↑ D M Smith, Radioactive Material in Scrap Metal - The UK Approach, Health & Safety Executive, Midlands Region Specialist Group
↑ Could that be a sealed radioactive source? Archived 2006-03-22 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA
↑ Reducing Risks in the Scrap Metal Industry Archived 2006-06-14 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA
↑ The radiological accident in Lilo - Scientific, technical ... https://www-pub.iaea.org › PDF › Pub1097_web
↑ The Radiological Accident in Gilan, IAEA (2002)
↑ College breaches radioactive regulations, BBC News, 12 March 2002
↑ "Poster Issued by the New York Department of Health (ca. 1981-1983)". Museum of Radiation and Radioactivity.
↑ Chiu Yu-Tzu (9 September 2003). "AEC urged to complete radioactive-rebar probe". Taipei Times . Retrieved 20 March 2011.
1 2 Chiu Yu-Tzu (29 April 2001). "Radioactive rebar linked to cancer". Taipei Times. Retrieved 20 March 2011.
↑ Chen, W.L.; Luan, Y.C.; Shieh, M.C.; Chen, S.T.; Kung, H.T.; Soong, K.L; Yeh, Y.C.; Chou, T.S.; Wu, J.T.; Sun, C.P.; Deng, W.P.; Wu, M.F.; Shen, M.L. (2004). "Effects of Cobalt-60 Exposure on Health of Taiwan Residents Suggest New Approach Needed in Radiation Protection" (PDF). Dose-Response. 5 (1). ecolo.org: 63–75. doi:10.2203/dose-response.06-105.Chen. PMC 2477708 . PMID 18648557 . Retrieved 20 March 2011. Note that ecolo.org and authors of the paper are not associated with one another.
↑ Hwang., S-L; H-R Guo; W-A Hsieh; J-S Hwang; S-D Lee; J-L Tang; C-C Chen; T-C Chang; J-D Wang; W P Chang (December 2006). "Cancer risks in a population with prolonged low dose-rate gamma-radiation exposure in radiocontaminated buildings, 1983-2002". International Journal of Radiation Biology. 82 (12): 849–58. doi:10.1080/09553000601085980. PMID 17178625. S2CID 20545464.
↑ Hwang, S-L; J-S Hwang; Y-T Yang; W A Hsieh; T-C Chang; H-R Guo; M-H Tsai; J-L Tang; I-F Lin; W P Chang (2008). "Estimates of Relative Risks for Cancers in a Population after Prolonged Low-Dose-Rate Radiation Exposure: A Follow-up Assessment from 1983 to 2005" (PDF). Radiation Research. 170 (2): 143–148. Bibcode:2008RadR..170..143H. doi:10.1667/RR0732.1. PMID 18666807. S2CID 41512364.
1 2 "El Cobalto". Bordering the Future. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. July 1998. Archived from the original on 3 June 2008.
↑ Radioactive Scrap Metal Archived March 21, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Nuclear Free Local Authorities
↑ The Radiological Accident in Samut Prakarn, IAEA
↑ Curry, Andrew (21 October 2011). "Why Is This Cargo Container Emitting So Much Radiation?". Wired.com. Retrieved 3 November 2011.
↑ "Asos Belts Seized Over Radioactive Studs". Sky News. 28 May 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
↑ The Radiological Accident in Goiânia, IAEA Vienna (1988)
↑ ^[permanent dead link ]
↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 17 September 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

External links

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] P Ortiz, V Friedrich, J Wheatley and M Oresegun, Lost & Found Dangers - Orphan Radiation Sources Raise Global Concerns Archived 2011-07-09 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA Bulletin 41: 18 (1999)

[2] Greta Joy Dicus, USA Perspectives - Safety & Security of Radioactive Sources Archived 2011-07-09 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA Bulletin 41: 22 (1999)

[3] D M Smith, Radioactive Material in Scrap Metal - The UK Approach, Health & Safety Executive, Midlands Region Specialist Group

[4] Could that be a sealed radioactive source? Archived 2006-03-22 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA

[5] Reducing Risks in the Scrap Metal Industry Archived 2006-06-14 at the Wayback Machine , IAEA

[6] The radiological accident in Lilo - Scientific, technical ... https://www-pub.iaea.org › PDF › Pub1097_web

[7] The Radiological Accident in Gilan, IAEA (2002)

[8] College breaches radioactive regulations, BBC News, 12 March 2002

[9] "Poster Issued by the New York Department of Health (ca. 1981-1983)". Museum of Radiation and Radioactivity.

[10] Chiu Yu-Tzu (9 September 2003). "AEC urged to complete radioactive-rebar probe". Taipei Times . Retrieved 20 March 2011.

[Yu-Tzu_rebar-11] 1 2 Chiu Yu-Tzu (29 April 2001). "Radioactive rebar linked to cancer". Taipei Times. Retrieved 20 March 2011.

[12] Chen, W.L.; Luan, Y.C.; Shieh, M.C.; Chen, S.T.; Kung, H.T.; Soong, K.L; Yeh, Y.C.; Chou, T.S.; Wu, J.T.; Sun, C.P.; Deng, W.P.; Wu, M.F.; Shen, M.L. (2004). "Effects of Cobalt-60 Exposure on Health of Taiwan Residents Suggest New Approach Needed in Radiation Protection" (PDF). Dose-Response. 5 (1). ecolo.org: 63–75. doi:10.2203/dose-response.06-105.Chen. PMC 2477708 . PMID 18648557 . Retrieved 20 March 2011. Note that ecolo.org and authors of the paper are not associated with one another.

[13] Hwang., S-L; H-R Guo; W-A Hsieh; J-S Hwang; S-D Lee; J-L Tang; C-C Chen; T-C Chang; J-D Wang; W P Chang (December 2006). "Cancer risks in a population with prolonged low dose-rate gamma-radiation exposure in radiocontaminated buildings, 1983-2002". International Journal of Radiation Biology. 82 (12): 849–58. doi:10.1080/09553000601085980. PMID 17178625. S2CID 20545464.

[14] Hwang, S-L; J-S Hwang; Y-T Yang; W A Hsieh; T-C Chang; H-R Guo; M-H Tsai; J-L Tang; I-F Lin; W P Chang (2008). "Estimates of Relative Risks for Cancers in a Population after Prolonged Low-Dose-Rate Radiation Exposure: A Follow-up Assessment from 1983 to 2005" (PDF). Radiation Research. 170 (2): 143–148. Bibcode:2008RadR..170..143H. doi:10.1667/RR0732.1. PMID 18666807. S2CID 41512364.

[El_Cobalto-15] 1 2 "El Cobalto". Bordering the Future. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. July 1998. Archived from the original on 3 June 2008.

[16] Radioactive Scrap Metal Archived March 21, 2007, at the Wayback Machine Nuclear Free Local Authorities

[17] The Radiological Accident in Samut Prakarn, IAEA

[18] Curry, Andrew (21 October 2011). "Why Is This Cargo Container Emitting So Much Radiation?". Wired.com. Retrieved 3 November 2011.

[19] "Asos Belts Seized Over Radioactive Studs". Sky News. 28 May 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2013.

[20] The Radiological Accident in Goiânia, IAEA Vienna (1988)

[21] [permanent dead link ]

[22] "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[23] "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 October 2012. Retrieved 17 September 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]