Rape investigation

Last updated

Rape investigation is the procedure to gather facts about a suspected rape, including forensic identification of a perpetrator, type of rape and other details.

Contents

The vast majority of rapes are committed by persons known to the victim: only between five and 15 percent of assaults are perpetrated by a stranger. [1] Therefore, the identity of the perpetrator is frequently reported. Biological evidence such as semen, blood, vaginal secretions, saliva, vaginal epithelial cells may be identified and genetically typed by a crime lab. The information derived from the analysis can often help determine whether sexual contact occurred, provide information regarding the circumstances of the incident, and be compared to reference samples collected from patients and suspects. [2] Medical personnel in many countries collect evidence for potential rape cases by using rape kits. The time it takes to have rape kits processed has been criticized. [3]

Forensic evidence

Victim injuries

A forensic medical examination is conducted head to toe to record all injuries from minor to severe for the purpose of recovering evidence to support the victim's assertion that a rape took place without consent. Swabbing for bodily fluid samples (saliva, semen, blood) reveals evidence that may identify or eliminate a suspect as well as the nature of the sexual activity that took place.

Toxicology report

Establishing the victim's levels of alcohol, prescription or recreational drugs by taking urine and blood samples can support an assertion that there was a lack of capacity to consent to sexual activity.

Passage of time

Where an alleged victim of rape comes forward days, weeks, months or even years after an alleged assault took place it is not always appropriate to conduct a physical forensic examination. Such a passing of time degrades any useful physical forensic evidence. Where allegations of rape or childhood sexual abuse are the subject of an investigation which relies on memory as the only evidence, a form of forensic interviewing may be used to assist with the investigation. [4] [5]

Documentary evidence

Documentary evidence will also be collected during a thorough rape investigation. This type of evidence can include paper records and digital records categorized as either public, judicial or private documents such as:

Perpetrator identification

DNA profiling

DNA profiling is used by crime laboratories for testing biological evidence, most commonly by means of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which allows analysis of samples of limited quality and quantity by making millions of copies. An advanced form of PCR testing called short tandem repeats (STR) generates a DNA profile that can be compared to DNA from a suspect or a crime scene. Blood, buccal (inner cheek) swabbings or saliva should also be collected from victims to distinguish their DNA from that of suspects. [2]

Criminals may plant fake DNA samples at crime scenes. In one case Dr. John Schneeberger, who raped one of his sedated patients and left semen on her underwear, surgically inserted a Penrose drain into his arm and filled it with foreign blood and anticoagulants. Police drew what they believed to be Schneeberger's blood and compared DNA on three occasions without a match.

Police statements

Rape investigations are typically initiated by the alleged victim themselves but suspected rape or sexual abuse can also be reported by a third party, investigating police officer or mandated reporter. The alleged victim will give either a written or video-recorded account to police of what they alleged happened. Then the accused perpetrator will subsequently be interviewed by the same investigating police. The recorded police statements will be used as evidence in court if charges are laid and a prosecution results from the investigation.

Contested quality of rape investigations

Criticism by sexual violence victim advocates

Sexual violence victim advocates have long claimed that police do not take rape victims seriously when they report their alleged assault to police. The crux of the claim is that police all too often rely on outdated and tired rape myths about women putting themselves in situations where they are likely to get raped, or that they lie about being raped to exact revenge. Advocates have for decades campaigned to governments and supreme courts to change laws and set legal precedents in order to facilitate a higher rate of rape charges and criminal convictions. These campaigns have resulted in legal changes across the common-wealth legal systems including broadening the criminal code definition of rape and sexual assault to include acts such as unwanted hugging, kissing or touching, removing the requirement to provide verifiable corroboration that a crime occurred, and changing the statute of limitations to allow more allegations of historical rape or sexual assault to be prosecuted. The campaigning has also led the U.K.'s justice department to issue guidance primarily aimed at police officers in planning and conducting interviews with alleged adult and child sexual violence victims. [6]

Criticism by wrongful conviction advocates

Advocates on behalf of those wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit, including rape, have long claimed that some police and prosecutors lack professional integrity, fail to conduct thorough investigations and engage in misconduct in order to achieve a conviction, regardless of whether or not the accused may be innocent. [7] There are many documented cases in the U.S. [8] and Canada [9] where this has been proven to be the case for the wrongfully convicted who either maintained their innocence or were coerced into pleading guilty to a crime they did not commit or that did not occur. Most recently in 2018, UK defence lawyers claimed that faith in the fairness of trials was eroded by police and prosecutors playing games in pursuit of convictions by withholding digital evidence that exonerated accused persons, such as mobile phone evidence. [10]

Circumstances and type of rape

Abrasions, bruises and lacerations on the victim help elucidate how a rape was carried out. 8 to 45 percent of victims show evidence of external trauma, most commonly at the mouth, throat, wrists, arms, breasts and thighs: trauma to these sites comprise approximately two thirds of injuries, while trauma to the vagina and perineum account for approximately 20 percent. [11]

Recent coitus can be determined by performing a vaginal wet-mount microscopy examination (or oral/anal if indicated) for detection of motile sperm, which are seen on the slide if less than three hours have elapsed since ejaculation. However, only one-third of sexual assaults result in ejaculation into a body orifice. [11] Further, the alleged assailant may have had a vasectomy or have experienced sexual dysfunction (roughly 50 percent of assailants suffer from impotence or ejaculatory dysfunction). [11] In addition, acid phosphatase levels in high concentrations is a good indicator of recent coitus. Acid phosphatase is found in prostatic secretions and activity decreases with time and is usually absent after 24 hours. [11] Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may be detected within a 48-hour period. The seminal fluid of vasectomized men also contains a significant PSA level. Nonmotile sperm may be detected even beyond 72 hours after intercourse depending on staining techniques. [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

Forensic science Application of science to criminal and civil laws

Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly—on the criminal side—during criminal investigation, as governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure. Forensic science is a broad field that includes; DNA analysis, fingerprint analysis, blood stain pattern analysis, firearms examination and ballistics, tool mark analysis, serology, toxicology, hair and fiber analysis, entomology, questioned documents, anthropology, odontology, pathology, epidemiology, footwear and tire tread analysis, drug chemistry, paint and glass analysis, digital audio video and photo analysis.

Colin Pitchfork British child-murderer and rapist

Colin Pitchfork is a British double child-murderer and rapist. He was the first person convicted of rape and murder using DNA profiling after he murdered two girls in neighbouring Leicestershire villages, the first in Narborough, in November 1983, and the second in Enderby in July 1986. He was arrested on 19 September 1987 and was sentenced to life imprisonment on 22 January 1988 after pleading guilty to both murders, with the judge giving him a 30-year minimum term. He was granted parole in June 2021, and was released on licence on 1 September that year. On 19 November the same year, he was recalled to prison for breach of licence conditions.

A rape kit is a package of items used by medical personnel for gathering and preserving physical evidence following an allegation of sexual assault. The evidence collected from the victim can aid the criminal rape investigation and the prosecution of a suspected assailant. DNA evidence can have tremendous utility for sexual assault investigations and prosecution by identifying offenders, revealing serial offenders through DNA matches across cases, and exonerating those who have been wrongly accused.

Murder of Marcia Trimble American child murder victim (1965–1975)

Marcia Virginia Trimble was a nine-year-old girl who disappeared on February 25, 1975, while delivering Girl Scout Cookies in Green Hills, an affluent area in Nashville, Tennessee.

False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case, or by someone sympathetic to either side. Misleading by suppressing evidence can also be considered a form of false evidence ; however, in some cases, suppressed evidence is excluded because it cannot be proved the accused was aware of the items found or of their location. The analysis of evidence may also be forged if the person doing the forensic work finds it easier to fabricate evidence and test results than to perform the actual work involved. Parallel construction is a form of false evidence in which the evidence is truthful but its origins are untruthfully described, at times in order to avoid evidence being excluded as inadmissible due to unlawful means of procurement such as an unlawful search.

Differential extraction refers to the process by which the DNA from two different types of cells can be extracted without mixing their contents. The most common application of this method is the extraction of DNA from vaginal epithelial cells and sperm cells from sexual assault cases in order to determine the DNA profiles of the victim and the perpetrator. Its success is based on the fact that sperm cells pack their DNA using protamines which are held together by disulfide bonds. The protamines sequester DNA from spermatozoa, making it more resilient to DNA extraction than DNA from epithelial cells.

Rape Type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse without consent

Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority, or against a person who is incapable of giving valid consent, such as one who is unconscious, incapacitated, has an intellectual disability, or is below the legal age of consent. The term rape is sometimes used interchangeably with the term sexual assault.

Murder of Teresa Cormack

Teresa Maida Cormack was a six-year-old murder victim from Napier, New Zealand. After fifteen years, advances in genetic analysis led to conviction of Jules Mikus for the crime. He had been identified as a potential suspect early in the investigation, but had offered an alibi that was accepted at the time.

John Schneeberger is a North Rhodesian-born criminal who drugged and raped one of his female patients and also his stepdaughter while a physician in Canada. For years, he evaded arrest by implanting a fake blood sample inside a plastic tube in his arm, which confounded DNA test results.

Worlds End Murders Crime in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1977

The World's End Murders is the colloquial name given to the murder of two girls, Christine Eadie, 17, and Helen Scott, 17, in Edinburgh, in October 1977. The case is so named because both victims were last seen alive leaving The World's End pub in Edinburgh's Old Town. The only person to stand trial accused of the murders, Angus Sinclair, was acquitted in 2007 in controversial circumstances. Following the amendment of the law of double jeopardy, which would have prevented his retrial, Sinclair was retried in October 2014 and convicted of both murders on 14 November 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years, the longest sentence by a Scottish court, meaning he would have been 106 years old when he was eligible for a potential release on parole. He died at HM Prison Glenochil aged 73 on 11 March 2019. Coincidentally, he died on the same day the BBC's Crimewatch Roadshow programme profiled the murders.

Debbie Smith Act United States federal criminal legislation

The Debbie Smith Act of 2004 provides United States federal government grants to eligible states and units of local government to conduct DNA analyses of backlogged DNA samples collected from victims of crimes and criminal offenders. The Act expands the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) and provides legal assistance to survivors of dating violence. Named after sexual assault survivor Debbie Smith, the Act was passed by the 108th Congress as part of larger legislation, the Justice for All Act of 2004, and signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 30, 2004. The Act amended the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, the DNA Identification Act of 1994, the Violence Against Women Act of 2000, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Act was reauthorized in 2008, extending the availability of DNA backlog reduction program grants, DNA evidence training and education program grants, and sexual assault forensic exam program grants through fiscal year 2014.

A serial rapist is someone who commits multiple rapes, whether with multiple victims or a single victim repeatedly over a period of time. Some serial rapists target children. The terms sexual predator, repeat rape and multiple offending can also be used to describe the activities of those who commit a number of consecutive rapes, but remain unprosecuted when self-reported in research. Others will commit their assaults in prisons. In some instances, a group of serial rapists will work together. These rapists can have a pattern of behavior that is sometimes used to predict their activities and aid in their arrest and conviction. Serial rapists also differ from one time offenders because "serial rapists more often involved kidnapping, verbally and physically threatening the victims, and using or threatening the use of weapons."

A false accusation of rape happens when a person says they have been raped when no rape has occurred.

Murder of Teresa De Simone 1979 murder of an English woman

Teresa Elena De Simone was murdered in Southampton, England, in 1979. Her murder led to one of the longest proven cases of a miscarriage of justice in English legal history. The murder occurred outside the Tom Tackle pub and was the subject of a three-year police investigation which resulted in the arrest of Sean Hodgson. Hodgson was convicted of the murder by a unanimous jury verdict in 1982 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. After serving 27 years in prison he was exonerated and released in March 2009. DNA analysis of semen samples that had been preserved from the original crime scene showed that they could not have come from him.

Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." While definitions and terminology of rape vary by jurisdiction in the United States, the FBI revised its definition to eliminate a requirement that the crime involve an element of force.

Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) is a sexual assault carried out on a person after the person has become incapacitated due to being under the influence of any mind-altering substances, such as having consumed alcohol or been intentionally administered another date rape drug. The rape form of DFSA is also known as predator rape. 75% of all acquaintance rapes involve alcohol and/or drugs. Drugs, when used with alcohol, can result in a loss of consciousness and a loss of the ability to consent to sex.

Cornelius Dupree Jr. is an American who was declared innocent of a 1980 conviction for aggravated robbery, which was alleged to have been committed during a rape in 1979. He was paroled in July 2010 after serving 30 years of a 75-year prison sentence in Texas. Prosecutors cleared him of the crime after a test of his DNA profile did not match traces of semen evidence from the case. Dupree, who was represented by the Innocence Project, spent more time in prison in Texas than any other inmate who was eventually exonerated by DNA evidence.

In Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), the United States Supreme Court decided that a cheek swab of an arrestee's DNA is comparable to fingerprinting and therefore, a legal police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Contaminated evidence is any foreign material that is introduced to a crime scene after the crime is committed. Contaminated evidence can be brought in by witnesses, suspects, victims, emergency responders, fire fighters, police officers and investigators.

Juan Rivera (wrongful conviction) American man (born 1972)

Juan A. Rivera Jr. is an American man who was wrongfully convicted three times for the 1992 rape and murder of 11-year-old Holly Staker in Waukegan, Illinois. He was convicted twice on the basis of a confession that he said was coerced. No physical evidence linked him to the crime scene. In 2015 he received a $20 million settlement from Lake County, Illinois for wrongful conviction, formerly the largest settlement of its kind in United States history.

References

  1. ↑ “Most Victims Know Their Attacker.” National Institute of Justice, 1 Oct. 2008. Archive
  2. 1 2 A National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations Archived 2011-07-08 at the Wayback Machine National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). September 2004
  3. ↑ (5 January 2015) New hope for rape kit testing advocates BBC News Magazine, Retrieved 5 January 2015
  4. ↑ "Forensic Interviewing – Child and Youth Advocacy Centres" . Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  5. ↑ "The Forensic Experiental Trauma Interview (FETI)". John E. Reid & Associates, Inc.
  6. ↑ "A guide to achieving best evidence - a practitioner guide" (PDF). Department of Justice UK. January 2012. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020.
  7. ↑ "Center for Prosecutor Integrity – Working to preserve the presumption of innocence, assure equal treatment under law, and bring an end to wrongful convictions" . Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  8. ↑ "Browse the National Registry of Exonerations". www.law.umich.edu. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  9. ↑ "Wrongful Convictions in Canada - Sex Crimes". Social Theory Watch.
  10. ↑ correspondent, Owen Bowcott Legal affairs (2018-02-12). "Justice system at 'breaking point' over digital evidence". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency Management of the Adult Female Rape Victim. American Family Physician, June, 1991. by Diane K. Beebe[reference is 26-years-old]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.