Roman emergency decrees

Last updated

The ancient Roman state encountered various kinds of external and internal emergencies. As such, they developed various responses to those issues.

Contents

When faced with an emergency, the early Roman Republic appointed dictators who would take charge of the emergency with relatively loose bounds of action and resolve that crisis before resigning. Through the Republic, various decrees allowed dictators and magistrates to conduct emergency levies of troops and suspend public business. During the late Roman Republic, the senatus consultum ultimum emerged wherein the senate would urge the magistrates to break the laws to ensure the safety of the state, usually with the promise of political and legal cover if the magistrates were later brought to account. A further decree was introduced where the senate stripped targets of their citizenship rights, allowing magistrates to treat them as foreign enemies.

The fall of the Roman Republic and the emergence of autocracy made most of the Republican decrees obsolete. The problems of public order they were meant to resolve were themselves resolved by the introduction of police forces. Various people, usually deposed emperors or provincial rebels, continued to be declared public enemies (hostis), but as the use of force became a normal part of imperial rule, various decrees authorising that use of force became unnecessary.

During the Republic

During the Roman Republic, the state had various measures which could be decreed in the case of an emergency. The main problems facing the Republic in the suppression of insurrections and other emergencies were three-fold. First, the state did not have at its disposal a standing army or police force to maintain public order. Second, the use of force to maintain public order was illegal inasmuch as all citizens had provocatio rights allowing them to appeal to the people against magisterial coercion. Third, the ability to hold rioters accountable through standard judicial process was slow and also could be itself disrupted by political mobs. [1]

Dictatorship

Senatus consultum ultimum

Starting in 121 BC with the repression of Gaius Gracchus and his supporters, the senate could urge magistrates to break the laws and employ force to suppress unspecified public enemies. Such decrees were similar to modern declarations of emergencies. [2]

Magistrates operating under the decree gained political cover to take whatever illegal actions thought necessary to resolve a crisis. [3] Actions taken under such decree were not legal or immunised, but magistrates prosecuted for crimes – usually the crime of killing a citizen without trial – committed in executing such a decree could escape punishment if they were able to justify their actions. [2]

Tumultus

A tumultus was a state of emergency declared under threat of hostile attack. During the duration of a tumultus, state officials wore military dress, all military leave was cancelled, and citizens were levied into the military. A iustitium also was normally declared, closing the law courts and suspending other civilian public business. [4] [5] The authority to declare a tumultus usually rested with a dictator, if in office, or the senate. [6]

According to Cicero, the early Roman Republic distinguished between two kinds of tumultus: a tumultus Italicus referring to a war in Italy – which in the late Republic meant a civil war – and a tumultus Gallicus referring to an attack by the Gauls. [4] Tumults also were declared against slave uprisings [7] and, in the late Republic, may have been declared by the senate or on consular authority alone after passage of a senatus consultum ultimum. [8] [9] To that end, it was repurposed as a means to raise militias to put down armed insurrections. [10]

In the middle Republic, the tumultus' emergency levy was the only time that citizens without sufficient property to qualify for military service (the capite censi or proletarii) were enrolled into the military; in 281 BC, responding to the invasion of Pyrrhus, the levied proletarii were also first armed at state expense. In the later Republic, the declaration remained a means to admit volunteers and quickly raise an army for the duration of the emergency. [4] [11] For the declaration's duration, plebeian tribunes also were sometimes asked to turn a blind eye to the enforcement of laws exempting certain classes of people, such as the elderly, from military service. [12]

Justitium

During the duration of a justitium, all civilian public business – including the operation of the public treasury [13] – was suspended; [14] this was ostensibly to allow the Roman people to concentrate their efforts on the levy. [4] It was normally proclaimed by a magistrate [a] – usually a consul or dictator – at the recommendation of the senate. [16] It could only be rescinded by the magistrate that proclaimed it. [15] Proclamations of a justitium were usually concurrent with those of a tumultus, but could otherwise be declared at the start of a military campaign or war. [17]

Hostis declaration

Lucius Cornelius Sulla was declared a public enemy during the Sulla's civil war (83-81 BC). Q. Pompeius Rufus, denarius, 54 BC, RRC 434-1 (Sulla only).jpg
Lucius Cornelius Sulla was declared a public enemy during the Sulla's civil war (83–81 BC).

A hostis (Latin : public enemy [18] ) declaration was a statement by the senate, sometimes ratified by a popular assembly, purporting to declare that certain named citizens were enemies of the state and were stripped of their citizenship. Stripping citizenship meant that a citizen could not raise provocatio (the right to appeal to the people against death penalties or physical punishment) and could be killed without trial. [10]

The first men to be declared hostis were Gaius Marius and eleven of his supporters during Sulla's consulship in 88 BC; [19] later, Sulla was voted hostis by the senate under the domination of Lucius Cornelius Cinna. [20] Its passage was controversial: Quintus Mucius Scaevola Augur objected to such a vote in the first instance against Marius, and later, some senators sought not to attend meetings of the senate where such declarations were likely to be proposed. [21]

During the Roman Empire

The need for various declarations declined during the Principate. Because of the formation of the Praetorian Guard and a regular police force with the cohortes urbanae and vigiles , large-scale urban riots became more rare. [22] Moreover, the military autocracy made it unnecessary to have legal justifications for violent crackdowns against rioters and revolts. [23]

A declaration that someone was hostis, however, persisted: when a usurper could not immediately be suppressed or a coup was displacing the current emperor, a few cases emerge where the senate declared the usurper or former emperor enemy of the state. [24] The emergence of autocratic rule also degraded the normal protections available to Roman citizens. [b] Hostis declarations also were used against provincial revolts, which had the effect of classifying provincial rebellions in terms of foreign wars rather than internal security measures. [26]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Whether Tiberius Gracchus proclaimed a justitium during his term as plebeian tribune to stop all public business was debated by scholars: Mommsen termed it one; modern scholars, however, disagree. [15]
  2. ↑ Specifically, provocatio appeals were passed to the emperor, diminishing their impact, and senators and other free men were subject to torture, in violation of the normal prohibition thereof. Other emperors executed alleged conspirators after secret trials or without trial at all. [25]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gracchi brothers</span> Ancient Roman brothers known for their social reforms

The Gracchi brothers were two brothers who lived during the beginning of the late Roman Republic: Tiberius Gracchus and Gaius Gracchus. They served in the plebeian tribunates of 133 BC and 122–121 BC, respectively. They have been received as well-born and eloquent advocates for social reform who were both killed by a reactionary political system; their terms in the tribunate precipitated a series of domestic crises which are viewed as unsettling the Roman Republic and contributing to its collapse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Republic</span> Period of Roman history (c. 509 – 27 BC)

The Roman Republic was the era of classical Roman civilisation beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire following the War of Actium. During this period, Rome's control expanded from the city's immediate surroundings to hegemony over the entire Mediterranean world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Kingdom</span> Period of Roman history (c. 753 – c. 509 BC)

The Roman Kingdom, also referred to as the Roman monarchy or the regal period of ancient Rome, was the earliest period of Roman history when the city and its territory were ruled by kings. According to tradition, the Roman Kingdom began with the city's founding c. 753 BC, with settlements around the Palatine Hill along the river Tiber in central Italy, and ended with the overthrow of the kings and the establishment of the Republic c. 509 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate of the Roman Republic</span> Governing and advisory assembly of the aristocracy

The Senate was the governing and advisory assembly of the aristocracy in the ancient Roman Republic. It was not an elected body, but one whose members were appointed by the consuls, and later by the censors, which were appointed by the aristocratic Centuriate Assembly. After a Roman magistrate served his term in office, it usually was followed with automatic appointment to the Senate. According to the Greek historian Polybius, the principal source on the Constitution of the Roman Republic, the Roman Senate was the predominant branch of government. Polybius noted that it was the consuls who led the armies and the civil government in Rome, and it was the Roman assemblies which had the ultimate authority over elections, legislation, and criminal trials. However, since the Senate controlled money, administration, and the details of foreign policy, it had the most control over day-to-day life. The power and authority of the Senate derived from precedent, the high caliber and prestige of the senators, and the Senate's unbroken lineage, which dated back to the founding of the Republic in 509 BC. It developed from the Senate of the Roman Kingdom, and became the Senate of the Roman Empire.

Lucius Appuleius Saturninus was a Roman populist and tribune. He is most notable for introducing a series of legislative reforms, alongside his associate Gaius Servilius Glaucia and with the consent of Gaius Marius, during the last years of the second century BC. Senatorial opposition to these laws eventually led to an internal crisis, the declaration of the senatus consultum ultimum, and the deaths of Saturninus, Glaucia, and their followers in 100 BC.

Lucius Opimius was a Roman politician who held the consulship in 121 BC, in which capacity and year he ordered the execution of 3,000 supporters of popular leader Gaius Gracchus without trial, using as pretext the state of emergency declared after Gracchus's recent and turbulent death. He was censured in 116 BC by a tribunal investigating illicit bribes taken from Jugurtha, king of Numidia, by his commission tasked with dividing territory between the king and his brother. He then left Rome to Dyrrhachium in exile where he later died.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaius Gracchus</span> Roman politician and reformer (c. 154 BC – 121 BC)

Gaius Sempronius Gracchus was a reformist Roman politician and soldier who lived during the 2nd century BC. He is most famous for his tribunate for the years 123 and 122 BC, in which he proposed a wide set of laws, including laws to establish colonies outside of Italy, engage in further land reform, reform the judicial system and system for provincial assignments, and create a subsidised grain supply for Rome.

<i>Senatus consultum ultimum</i> Ancient Roman state of emergency law

The senatus consultum ultimum is the modern term given to resolutions of the Roman Senate lending its moral support for magistrates to use the full extent of their powers and ignore the laws to safeguard the state.

Justitium is a concept of Roman law, equivalent to the declaration of the state of emergency. Some scholars also refer to it as a state of exception, stemming from a state of necessity. It involved the suspension of civil business, typically including the courts, the treasury and the Senate and was ordered by the Roman higher magistrates. It was usually declared following a sovereign's death, during the troubled period of interregnum, but also in case of invasions. However, in this last case, it was not as much the physical danger of invasion that justified the instauration of a state of exception, as the consequences that the news of the invasion had in Rome; for example, justitium was proclaimed at the news of Hannibal's attacks. The earliest recorded occasion of justitium being invoked was for the same reason, when in 465 BC panic gripped the city due to a mistaken belief of imminent invasion by the Aequi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman magistrate</span> Elected official in ancient Rome

The Roman magistrates were elected officials in ancient Rome. During the period of the Roman Kingdom, the King of Rome was the principal executive magistrate. His power, in practice, was absolute. He was the chief priest, lawgiver, judge, and the sole commander of the army. When the king died, his power reverted to the Roman Senate, which then chose an Interrex to facilitate the election of a new king.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Republic</span>

The constitution of the Roman Republic was a set of uncodified norms and customs which, together with various written laws, guided the procedural governance of the Roman Republic. The constitution emerged from that of the Roman kingdom, evolved substantively and significantly – almost to the point of unrecognisability – over the almost five hundred years of the republic. The collapse of republican government and norms beginning in 133 BC would lead to the rise of Augustus and his principate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Constitution</span> Set of guidelines and principles

The Roman Constitution was an uncodified set of guidelines and principles passed down mainly through precedent. The Roman constitution was not formal or even official, largely unwritten and constantly evolving. Having those characteristics, it was therefore more like the British and United States common law system than a sovereign law system like the English Constitutions of Clarendon and Great Charter or the United States Constitution, even though the constitution's evolution through the years was often directed by passage of new laws and repeal of older ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Senate</span> Political institution in ancient Rome

The Roman Senate was the highest and constituting assembly of ancient Rome and its aristocracy. With different powers throughout its existence it lasted from the first days of the city of Rome as the Senate of the Roman Kingdom, to the Senate of the Roman Republic and Senate of the Roman Empire and eventually the Byzantine Senate of the Eastern Roman Empire, existing well into the post-classical era and Middle Ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman assemblies</span> Assemblies active in the time of Roman rule

The Roman Assemblies were institutions in ancient Rome. They functioned as the machinery of the Roman legislative branch, and thus passed all legislation. Since the assemblies operated on the basis of a direct democracy, ordinary citizens, and not elected representatives, would cast all ballots. The assemblies were subject to strong checks on their power by the executive branch and by the Roman Senate. Laws were passed by Curia, Tribes, and century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive magistrates of the Roman Republic</span>

The executive magistrates of the Roman Republic were officials of the ancient Roman Republic, elected by the People of Rome. Ordinary magistrates (magistratus) were divided into several ranks according to their role and the power they wielded: censors, consuls, praetors, curule aediles, and finally quaestor. Any magistrate could obstruct (veto) an action that was being taken by a magistrate with an equal or lower degree of magisterial powers. By definition, plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles were technically not magistrates as they were elected only by the plebeians, but no ordinary magistrate could veto any of their actions. Dictator was an extraordinary magistrate normally elected in times of emergency for a short period. During this period, the dictator's power over the Roman government was absolute, as they were not checked by any institution or magistrate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate of the Roman Empire</span> Historical political institution in ancient Rome

The Senate of the Roman Empire was a political institution in the ancient Roman Empire. After the fall of the Roman Republic, the constitutional balance of power shifted from the Roman Senate to the Roman Emperor. Beginning with the first emperor, Augustus, the Emperor and the Senate were technically two co-equal branches of government. In practice, however, the actual authority of the imperial Senate was negligible, as the Emperor held the true power of the state. As such, membership in the senate became sought after by individuals seeking prestige and social standing, rather than actual authority. During the reigns of the first Emperors, legislative, judicial, and electoral powers were all transferred from the "Roman assemblies" to the Senate. However, since the control that the Emperor held over the senate was absolute, the Senate acted as a vehicle through which the Emperor exercised his autocratic powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic</span>

The history of the Constitution of the Roman Republic is a study of the ancient Roman Republic that traces the progression of Roman political development from the founding of the Roman Republic in 509 BC until the founding of the Roman Empire in 27 BC. The constitutional history of the Roman Republic can be divided into five phases. The first phase began with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and the final phase ended with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Republic, and thus created the Roman Empire, in 27 BC. Throughout the history of the Republic, the constitutional evolution was driven by the struggle between the aristocracy and the ordinary citizens.

<i>Senatus consultum</i> Resolution of the ancient Roman Senate

A senatus consultum is a text emanating from the senate in Ancient Rome. It is used in the modern phrase senatus consultum ultimum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catilinarian conspiracy</span> Attempted coup in the Roman republic in 63 BC

The Catilinarian conspiracy, sometimes Second Catilinarian conspiracy, was an attempted coup d'état by Lucius Sergius Catilina (Catiline) to overthrow the Roman consuls of 63 BC – Marcus Tullius Cicero and Gaius Antonius Hybrida – and forcibly assume control of the state in their stead.

The War of Mutina was a civil war between the Roman Senate and Mark Antony in Northern Italy. It was the first civil war after the assassination of Julius Caesar. The main issue of the war was attempts by the Senate to resist Antony's forceful assumption of the strategically important provinces of Transalpine and Cisalpine Gaul from their governors. The Senate, led by Cicero and the consuls, attempted to woo Julius Caesar's heir to fight against Antony. Octavian, however, would pursue his own agenda.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Kelly 2016, pp. 374–75.
  2. 1 2 Momigliano & Lintott 2012.
  3. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 148.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Treve & Cornell 2012.
  5. ↑ Berger & Lintott 2012.
  6. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 44.
  7. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 70.
  8. ↑ Golden 2013 , p. 84. "One the senatus consultum ultimum was passed, the consul Cicero would have considered himself free to employ any measure he considered useful.. and the tumultus declaration is one he might immediately have thought of [after reports] that Catiline... had taken the field with an army".
  9. ↑ Golden 2013 , p. 145. "It is also likely at this time [early January 49 BC, shortly before Caesar's invasion of Italy ] a state of tumultus was in effect".
  10. 1 2 Kelly 2016, p. 377.
  11. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 48.
  12. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 45.
  13. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 103.
  14. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 87.
  15. 1 2 Golden 2013, p. 88.
  16. ↑ Golden 2013, pp. 87–88.
  17. ↑ Golden 2013, pp. 88, 93.
  18. ↑ Lewis, Charleton (1890). "hostis". An Elementary Latin Dictionary. New York: American Book Company – via Perseus Digital Library.
  19. ↑ Bauman, R (1973). "The "hostis" declaration of 88 and 87 BC" . Athenaeum. 51: 270 et seq.
  20. ↑ Golden 2013, p. 120 n. 56.
  21. ↑ Kelly 2016 , p. 377. See Cic. Cat., 4.
  22. ↑ Kelly 2016, p. 379.
  23. ↑ Kelly 2016, p. 380.
  24. ↑ Kelly 2016, p. 378.
  25. ↑ Kelly 2016, pp. 378–79.
  26. ↑ Kelly 2016, p. 383.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.