Princeps senatus

Last updated

The princeps senatus (PLprincipes senatus), in English the leader of the senate, was the first member by precedence on the membership rolls of the Roman Senate. [1] [2] Although officially out of the cursus honorum and possessing no imperium , this office conferred prestige on the senator holding it.

Contents

The position was created in the first half of the third century BC and retained its prominence for two centuries. The principes were often the most famous Roman politicians of the period, such Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, Scipio Africanus, and Marcus Aemilius Scaurus. It lost its importance after the reforms of the dictator Sulla in 82–80 BC, but might have been temporarily restored for Cicero, its possible last incumbent during the struggle between Mark Antony and the Senate in 43 BC. The Roman emperors merged the princeps senatus' prerogatives with their own, although there are occasional mentions of distinctive principes during the later Empire.

History

The princeps senatus was chosen by the pair of censors (that is, every 5 years on average) whenever there was a vacancy on the seat during their tenure. [3] The princeps senatus was not a lifetime appointment. However, in practice, the incumbent princeps senatus was always re-appointed by the censors. [4]

Traditionally, the princeps senatus had the honour of speaking first on any motion or topic presented by the presiding magistrate. [5] By the middle republic, [6] the princeps senatus was the most prestigious position in Rome and had adduced further privileges: he moved all routine senate business, having power to have his input directly moulded into them by choosing their wording. He also set out the possible options on controversial proposals. [7] Some notable principes of this period were the famous Scipio Africanus (appointed in 199, 194, and 189) and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, who was appointed a record six times between 179 and 154 and combined his position with that of pontifex maximus – the Roman chief priesthood. [8]

Appointment

The position of princeps senatus was not defined by law ( lex ), but by tradition ( mos ), which makes it more difficult to follow its evolution. For a long time, modern historians were influenced by the works of Theodor Mommsen, who thought that the principes senatus could only be patricians of the gentes maiores – the most illustrious patrician families (Cornelia, Valeria, Fabia, Aemilia, Manlia, and Claudia). [9] However, Francis Ryan showed that Mommsen's argument was circular: he first asserted that the princeps must be from a gens maior, and later said the list of gentes maiores can be drawn from the principes – while ancient sources are silent on many principes and do not give the list of the gentes maiores. [10] [11] Ryan has argued instead that the princeps could be a plebeian: first, ancient sources never mention Mommsen's patrician requirement; second, because the post was established after the end of the Conflict of the Orders, the plebeians would not have allowed the patricians to create an office barred to them. [12]

The princeps senatus appeared in the beginning of the third century BC, possibly in 275. [13] It finds its origin in the lex Ovinia of c. 313 BC, [14] which considerably changed the composition of the Senate. Before this law, senators were about a hundred and appointed by the consuls from among their supporters; membership of the Senate therefore changed every year. The lex Ovinia transferred the power to appoint senators to the censors, who could only remove senators in case of misconduct, thus making them appointed for life. The law also increased their number to 300. These changes led the censors to make an official list of senators, recording their right to sit in the Senate. The first censor to make this list was likely Appius Claudius Caecus, who was said to have invented the rhotacism in Latin, perhaps in the process of writing this list, since several Latin names changed in these years. [15] Another reform of the Senate followed a few decades later: senators were by now picked from among former magistrates. [16] As a result, senators were ordered by the censors in several ranks according to their past magistracies. This ordering by seniority led to the creation of the princeps senatus: the first name on the list of senators, who was always the most senior ex-censor, patrician or plebeian; the censors could not make a choice between candidates. [17] Caecus was almost certainly not the first princeps, because the extensive tradition about him would not have failed to mention this fact. He is also described as an old man speaking in the Senate against Pyrrhus c. 280 BC. Since he was the most senior former censor at that date, the first princeps was necessarily appointed after his death. [18] The most probable candidate is therefore Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus, chosen by the censors of 275, whose lectio left a mark in ancient sources. [19]

Ancient bust of Scipio Africanus, princeps senatus from 199 to 184/183 BC. Bust of Sulla (loan from Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek) - Glyptothek - Munich - Germany 2017.jpg
Ancient bust of Scipio Africanus, princeps senatus from 199 to 184/183 BC.

In 209 BC, the censor Publius Sempronius Tuditanus went against the tradition and appointed Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus instead of Titus Manlius Torquatus, the senior ex-censor. Tuditanus justified his choice by saying that Fabius was the foremost of all the Romans ("princeps Romanae civitatis"). [20] After this date, the princeps was the most important politician of the day, chosen among the ex-consuls, and often one of the sitting censors, appointed by the other censor. [21] When the censors could not agree on a candidate, the choice was solved by lot, as in 209 BC. [22]

Decline after Sulla's reforms

The status and function of princeps senatus ceased to be relevant after the reforms of Sulla in 82–80 BC. As dictator, Sulla established a strict oligarchic order in order to prevent any man from rising above the rest (for example, iteration of the consulship was banned). Several scholars, such as Theodor Mommsen and Ernst Badian, believe that Sulla even abolished the office. [23] [24] However, Sulla would probably not have demoted his close ally, the princeps Lucius Valerius Flaccus, who had enabled his appointment as dictator though the lex Valeria . [25] Although the position probably continued – there was still a list of senators and someone had to be listed first – the prerogatives of the office fell away. In particular, consuls designate assumed the honour of speaking first. [26] [27] This may be because, through the 80s and 70s, the senior living ex-censors – the most senior members of the senate, in the absence of a formal princeps senatus due to the paucity of censorial lectiones, – were largely uninfluential and unimportant men. Even when named first in the list of senators, they were largely so named by default or custom and were unable to assert speaking privilege before more influential, but junior, consulars. [28]

Modern statue of Marcus Aemlius Lepidus, the longest serving princeps senatus (179-153/152 BC). Marcus Aemilius Lepidus I.jpg
Modern statue of Marcus Aemlius Lepidus, the longest serving princeps senatus (179–153/152 BC).
Ancient bust of Cicero, possibly the last princeps senatus of the republic in 43 BC. Cicero - Musei Capitolini.JPG
Ancient bust of Cicero, possibly the last princeps senatus of the republic in 43 BC.

Pierre Willems and Francis Ryan have suggested that Cicero may have been the last princeps senatus of the Republic, appointed after April 43 by his fellow senators. Such restoration of this ancient office was part of "diehard republicans"' propaganda against Mark Antony, whom Cicero had violently attacked in his Philippicae . [29] Cicero's ascribed leadership of the senate, however, may not necessarily correspond to the traditional princeps senatus' office. [30]

During the Empire

The position was revived by Augustus in 28 BC; he, irregularly, appointed himself. If the post was limited to certain gentes, the Julii were possibly ineligible, and Augustus was not yet then one of the customary candidates (senior ex-censors). Regardless, Augustus held the office until his death; it then absorbed into the emperor's offices and powers. [31]

In the emperor's absence, it is possible that a senator was granted the privilege of holding this role when the Senate met; the notoriously unreliable Historia Augusta claimed that during the Crisis of the Third Century, some others held the position; in particular, it stated that the future emperor Valerian held the office in AD 238, during the reigns of Maximinus Thrax and Gordian I, and he continued to hold it through to the reign of Decius. [32] [ citation needed ] The same source also makes the same claim about Tacitus when the Senate acclaimed him emperor in AD 275. [33] [ citation needed ]

List of principes senatus

Mommsen (1864)Willems (1878)Suolahti (1972)Ryan (1998)Ryan's dating [34]
1 M'. Valerius Maximus M'. Valerius Maximus M'. Valerius Maximus Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus c. 275 – c. 265
2 M. Fabius Ambustus M. Fabius Ambustus M. Fabius Ambustus C. Marcius Rutilus Censorinus 265 – before 258
3 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges 258 – 247 or 241
4 Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges Cn. Cornelius Blasio 247 or 241 – before 230
5 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus M. Fabius Buteo M. Fabius Buteo C. Duilius c. 230 – 225
6 P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus M'. Valerius Maximus Corvinus Messalla c. 225 – before 220
7 L. Valerius Flaccus P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus Aulus Manlius Torquatus Atticus c. 220 – before 216
8 M. Aemilius Lepidus L. Valerius Flaccus L. Valerius Flaccus M. Fabius Buteo by 216 – 209
9 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum M. Aemilius Lepidus M. Aemilius Lepidus Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus 209 – 203
10 Ap. Claudius Pulcher P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus 199 – 184/183
11 P. Cornelius Lentulus (cos 162) P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio Ap. Claudius Pulcher L. Valerius Flaccus 184/183 – 180
12 M. Aemilius Scaurus Ap. Claudius Pulcher L. Cornelius Lentulus Lupus M. Aemilius Lepidus 179–153/152
13 L. Valerius Flaccus P. Cornelius Lentulus (cos 162) P. Cornelius Lentulus (cos 162) P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum c. 147 – c. 141
14 Mam. Aemilius Lepidus Livianus L. Cornelius Lentulus Lupus M. Aemilius Scaurus Ap. Claudius Pulcher c. 136 – before 130
15 M. Aemilius Scaurus L. Valerius Flaccus L. Cornelius Lentulus Lupus 130? – before 125
16 L. Valerius Flaccus P. Cornelius Lentulus (cos 162)c. 125 – before 115
17 Quintus Lutatius Catulus M. Aemilius Scaurus 115 – c. 89
18 Publius Servilius Vatia Isauricus L. Valerius Flaccus by 86 – 70s
19 M. Tullius Cicero M. Tullius Cicero after 21 April – 7 Dec. 43

Citations

  1. ↑ Roberts, John, ed. (2007). "Princeps senatus". Oxford Dictionary of the Classical World. Oxford Reference. p. 858. doi:10.1093/acref/9780192801463.001.0001. ISBN   9780192801463.
  2. ↑ Badian 2012 . "The senator whose name was entered first on the senate list compiled by the censors".
  3. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 233.
  4. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 244.
  5. ↑ Badian 2012; Lintott 2009, p. 78.
  6. ↑ Rafferty 2011, pp. 1–2.
  7. ↑ Rafferty 2011, p. 2.
  8. ↑ Ryan 1998, pp. 179, 181.
  9. ↑ Broughton 1952, p. 130 n. 1.
  10. ↑ Mommsen 1864a , pp.  92–94 , 258–59.
  11. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 225; Rafferty 2011.
  12. ↑ Ryan 1998, pp. 226–29.
  13. ↑ Ryan 1998 , p. 170.
  14. ↑ Broughton 1951, pp. 158–59.
  15. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 138.
  16. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 168.
  17. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 230.
  18. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 143.
  19. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 170.
  20. ↑ Liv. 27.11.
  21. ↑ Ryan 1998, p. 231.
  22. ↑ Ryan 1998 , p. 239. It is also the only case of such disagreement between censors.
  23. ↑ Rafferty 2011, p. 1.
  24. ↑ Eg Badian 2012 . "Sulla abolished the office, since he did not want any one senator to have such power".
  25. ↑ Ryan 1998, pp. 191–94.
  26. ↑ Lintott 2009, p. 78.
  27. ↑ Rafferty 2011, pp. 6–7.
  28. ↑ Rafferty 2011, passim.
  29. ↑ Ryan 1998, pp. 200–03.
  30. ↑ Rafferty 2011 , pp. 2–3 n. 6, explaining, "Cicero can be described as the 'leader of the Senate' in its struggle against Antony... but that does not make him princeps senatus within the traditional meaning of that term".
  31. ↑ Badian 2012 . "Augustus revived it, appointing himself ... His successors took it as a matter of course".
  32. ↑ Historia Augusta, The Three Gordians, 9.7; The Two Valerians, 5.4
  33. ↑ Historia Augusta, Tacitus, 4.1
  34. ↑ Ryan often gives several dates for each princeps and various degrees of certainty; out of practicality, only the dates that he considers the most probable are reproduced here.

Related Research Articles

<i>Cursus honorum</i> The sequential order of public offices held by politicians in Ancient Rome

The cursus honorum was the sequential order of public offices held by aspiring politicians in the Roman Republic and the early Roman Empire. It was designed for men of senatorial rank. The cursus honorum comprised a mixture of military and political administration posts; the ultimate prize for winning election to each "rung" in the sequence was to become one of the two consuls in a given year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate of the Roman Republic</span> Governing and advisory assembly of the aristocracy

The Senate was the governing and advisory assembly of the aristocracy in the ancient Roman Republic. It was not an elected body, but one whose members were appointed by the consuls, and later by the censors. After a Roman magistrate served his term in office, it usually was followed with automatic appointment to the Senate. According to the Greek historian Polybius, the principal source on the Constitution of the Roman Republic, the Roman Senate was the predominant branch of government. Polybius noted that it was the consuls who led the armies and the civil government in Rome, and it was the Roman assemblies which had the ultimate authority over elections, legislation, and criminal trials. However, since the Senate controlled money, administration, and the details of foreign policy, it had the most control over day-to-day life. The power and authority of the Senate derived from precedent, the high caliber and prestige of the senators, and the Senate's unbroken lineage, which dated back to the founding of the Republic in 509 BC. It developed from the Senate of the Roman Kingdom, and became the Senate of the Roman Empire.

Gaius Sempronius Gracchus was a reformist Roman politician and soldier who lived during the 2nd century BC. He is most famous for his tribunate for the years 123 and 122 BC, in which he proposed a wide set of laws, including laws to establish colonies outside of Italy, engage in further land reform, reform the judicial system and system for provincial assignments, and create a subsidised grain supply for Rome.

Marcus Aemilius Scaurus was a Roman statesman who served as consul in 115 BC. He was also a long-standing princeps senatus, occupying the post from 115 until his death in late 89 or early 88 BC, and as such was widely considered one of the most prestigious and influential politicians of the late Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fabia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Fabia was one of the most ancient patrician families at ancient Rome. The gens played a prominent part in history soon after the establishment of the Republic, and three brothers were invested with seven successive consulships, from 485 to 479 BC, thereby cementing the high repute of the family. Overall, the Fabii received 45 consulships during the Republic. The house derived its greatest lustre from the patriotic courage and tragic fate of the 306 Fabii in the Battle of the Cremera, 477 BC. But the Fabii were not distinguished as warriors alone; several members of the gens were also important in the history of Roman literature and the arts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman dictator</span> Extraordinary magistrate of the Roman Republic

A Roman dictator was an extraordinary magistrate in the Roman Republic endowed with full authority to resolve some specific problem to which he had been assigned. He received the full powers of the state, subordinating the other magistrates, consuls included, for the specific purpose of resolving that issue, and that issue only, and then dispensing with those powers immediately.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conflict of the Orders</span> Political conflict in the Roman Republic, 500–287 BC

The Conflictof the Orders, sometimes referred to as the Struggle of the Orders, was a political struggle between the plebeians (commoners) and patricians (aristocrats) of the ancient Roman Republic lasting from 500 BC to 287 BC in which the plebeians sought political equality with the patricians. It played a major role in the development of the Constitution of the Roman Republic. Shortly after the founding of the Republic, this conflict led to a secession from Rome by the Plebeians to the Sacred Mount at a time of war. The result of this first secession was the creation of the office of plebeian tribune, and with it the first acquisition of real power by the plebeians.

<i>Senatus consultum ultimum</i> Ancient Roman state of emergency law

The senatus consultum ultimum is the modern term given to resolutions of the Roman Senate lending its moral support for magistrates to use the full extent of their powers and ignore the laws to safeguard the state.

Gaius Servilius Glaucia was a Roman politician who served as praetor in 100 BC. He is most well known for being an illegal candidate for the consulship of 99 BC. He was killed during riots and political violence in the year 100 BC while pursuing consular candidacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plebeian Council</span> Principal assembly of the ancient Roman Republic

The Concilium Plebis was the principal assembly of the common people of the ancient Roman Republic. It functioned as a legislative/judicial assembly, through which the plebeians (commoners) could pass legislation, elect plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles, and try judicial cases. The Plebeian Council was originally organized on the basis of the Curia but in 471 BC adopted an organizational system based on residential districts or tribes. The Plebeian Council usually met in the well of the Comitium and could only be convoked by the tribune of the plebs. The patricians were excluded from the Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flamen Martialis</span> High priest of Mars in ancient Rome

In ancient Roman religion, the Flamen Martialis was the high priest of the official state cult of Mars, the god of war. He was one of the flamines maiores, the three high priests who were the most important of the fifteen flamens. The Flamen Martialis would have led public rites on the days sacred to Mars. Among his duties was the ritual brandishing of the sacred spears of Mars when the Roman army was preparing for war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curiate Assembly</span> Peoples assembly in ancient rome

The Curiate Assembly was the principal assembly that evolved in shape and form over the course of the Roman Kingdom until the Comitia Centuriata organized by Servius Tullius. During these first decades, the people of Rome were organized into thirty units called "Curiae". The Curiae were ethnic in nature, and thus were organized on the basis of the early Roman family, or, more specifically, on the basis of the thirty original patrician (aristocratic) clans. The Curiae formed an assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The Curiate Assembly passed laws, elected Consuls, and tried judicial cases. Consuls always presided over the assembly. While plebeians (commoners) could participate in this assembly, only the patricians could vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cornelia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Cornelia was one of the greatest patrician houses at ancient Rome. For more than seven hundred years, from the early decades of the Republic to the third century AD, the Cornelii produced more eminent statesmen and generals than any other gens. At least seventy-five consuls under the Republic were members of this family, beginning with Servius Cornelius Maluginensis in 485 BC. Together with the Aemilii, Claudii, Fabii, Manlii, and Valerii, the Cornelii were almost certainly numbered among the gentes maiores, the most important and powerful families of Rome, who for centuries dominated the Republican magistracies. All of the major branches of the Cornelian gens were patrician, but there were also plebeian Cornelii, at least some of whom were descended from freedmen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus</span> Roman general and politician

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus was a Roman politician and general who was one of two Consuls of the Republic in 72 BC along with Lucius Gellius. Closely linked to the family of Pompey, he is noted for being one of the consular generals who led Roman legions against the slave armies of Spartacus in the Third Servile War.

Marcus Aemilius Scaurus was a Roman politician of the 1st century BC and son of Marcus Aemilius Scaurus and Caecilia Metella.

Gaius Valerius Flaccus was a Roman general, politician and statesman. He was consul of the Roman Republic in 93 BC and a provincial governor in the late-90s and throughout the 80s. He is notable for his balanced stance during the Sullan civil wars, the longevity of his term as governor, and his efforts to extend citizenship to non-Romans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of the Roman Republic</span> Norms, customs, and written laws, which guided the government of the Roman Republic

The constitution of the Roman Republic was a set of uncodified norms and customs which, together with various written laws, guided the procedural governance of the Roman Republic. The constitution emerged from that of the Roman kingdom, evolved substantively and significantly—almost to the point of unrecognisability—over the almost five hundred years of the republic. The collapse of republican government and norms beginning in 133 BC would lead to the rise of Augustus and his principate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic</span> Aspect of history surrounding the Roman Republics constitution

The history of the Constitution of the Roman Republic is a study of the ancient Roman Republic that traces the progression of Roman political development from the founding of the Roman Republic in 509 BC until the founding of the Roman Empire in 27 BC. The constitutional history of the Roman Republic can be divided into five phases. The first phase began with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and the final phase ended with the revolution which overthrew the Roman Republic, and thus created the Roman Empire, in 27 BC. Throughout the history of the Republic, the constitutional evolution was driven by the struggle between the aristocracy and the ordinary citizens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Centuriate Assembly</span> Roman assembly that elected all magistrates holding imperium

The Centuriate Assembly of the Roman Republic was one of the three voting assemblies in the Roman constitution. It was named the Centuriate Assembly as it originally divided Roman citizens into groups of one hundred men by classes. The centuries initially reflected military status, but were later based on the wealth of their members. The centuries gathered into the Centuriate Assembly for legislative, electoral, and judicial purposes. The majority of votes in any century decided how that century voted. Each century received one vote, regardless of how many electors each Century held. Once a majority of centuries voted in the same way on a given measure, the voting ended, and the matter was decided. Only the Centuriate Assembly could declare war or elect the highest-ranking Roman magistrates: consuls, praetors and censors. The Centuriate Assembly could also pass a law that granted constitutional command authority, or "Imperium", to Consuls and Praetors, and Censorial powers to Censors. In addition, the Centuriate Assembly served as the highest court of appeal in certain judicial cases, and ratified the results of a Census.

Lucius Valerius Flaccus was a consul of the Roman Republic in 100 BC and princeps senatus during the civil wars of the 80s. He is noted for his peace initiatives, which failed, and for sponsoring the Lex Valeria that created the dictatorship of Sulla.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.