List of Roman nomina

Last updated

This is a list of Roman nomina. The nomen identified all free Roman citizens as members of individual gentes , originally families sharing a single nomen and claiming descent from a common ancestor. Over centuries, a gens could expand from a single family to a large clan, potentially including hundreds or even thousands of members. Some of these may have been the descendants of freedmen or persons who entered the gens through adoption, while in other cases, different families that had assumed the same nomen in the distant past became confused with one another, and came to be regarded as a single gens.

Contents

In the following list, "I" and "J" are treated as separate letters, as are "U" and "V". The letter "K" was rare in Latin, and the few nomina occasionally spelled with this letter were usually spelled with "C". No Roman gentes began with "X", and the letters "Y" and "Z" occurred only in names borrowed from Greek. The letter "W" did not exist in Classical Latin. Nomina are given in the masculine form—the form borne by all male members of a gens. The gentes themselves were grammatically feminine.

Those nomina representing gentes for which separate articles exist are linked to those articles; those belonging to only one or two individuals, or known from only a few inscriptions, are not usually linked, but may be cited to the literary sources or inscriptions in which they are attested.

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

Z

See also

Related Research Articles

The gens Afrania was a plebeian family at Rome, which is first mentioned in the second century BC. The first member of this gens to achieve prominence was Gaius Afranius Stellio, who became praetor in 185 BC.

The gens Alliena or Aliena was a minor plebeian family of the Roman Republic. The first member of the gens to achieve prominence was Lucius Alienus, plebeian aedile in 454 BC. However, the family then slipped into obscurity for several centuries, emerging once more in the first century BC.

The gens Aviena, occasionally written Avienia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number of Avieni are known from inscriptions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nasidia gens</span> Plebeian family at Rome

The gens Nasidia was an obscure plebeian family at Rome. The gens is best known from Quintus Nasidius, one of the admirals of Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus during the Civil War. Although none of the Nasidii are known to have held any of the higher offices of the Roman state, a number are known from inscriptions. A coin of this gens depicts the head of Pompeius and a trident on the obverse, and on the reverse a ship, with the inscription Q. Nasidius.

The gens Numonia, occasionally written Nummonia, was a minor plebeian family at Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned in the early years of the Empire. Few if any of the Numonii held any Roman magistracies.

The gens Occia was a minor plebeian family at Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned under Tiberius, but must have been at Rome for much longer; for Tacitus speaks of Occia, a Vestal Virgin who died in AD 19, after serving faithfully for fifty-seven years. A few of the Occii pursued political careers in this period, but most are known only from inscriptions.

The gens Opetreia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are known to have held any important magistracies, but a number of them are found in inscriptions.

The gens Pacilia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned by the ancient historians, of whom the most famous may be a certain Marcus Pacilius spoken of by Cicero in his second oration against Verres. However, many Pacilii are known from inscriptions.

The gens Petreia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned toward the end of the second century BC, and several were distinguished as soldiers, but none of them ever attained the consulship.

The gens Pontilia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens appear in history, but a number of them are mentioned in inscriptions.

The gens Racilia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned as early as the fifth century BC, but few of them achieved any prominence in the Roman state.

The gens Remmia, occasionally written Remia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, of whom the most illustrious was the grammarian Quintus Remmius Palaemon, but many others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Safinia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Seccia, Secia, or Siccia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens occur in history, but a number are known from inscriptions. The best known members include Lucius Siccius Dentatus, who won martial fame in the fifth century BC, and Gaius Secius Campanus suffect consul under Domitian.

The gens Tatia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. This gens is perhaps best known from the legendary figure of Titus Tatius, a Sabine king who fought against Romulus, and who subsequently became joint ruler of Rome. None of the Tatii held any of the higher magistracies of the Roman Republic, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tettiena was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens first appear in history in the time of Vespasian, from which they rose to hold the highest offices of the Roman state, but in the second century they once again faded into obscurity.

The gens Titedia, also written as Titidia, or Titiedia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, and only one, Titidius Labeo, held any of the higher magistracies of the Roman state; others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tituria was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens appear in history, of whom the most famous is Quintus Titurius Sabinus, one of Caesar's legates during the Gallic Wars. Other Titurii are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tursidia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, but a few are known from inscriptions. Although they gained admission to the Roman senate, none of them rose higher than the rank of aedile.

The gens Tuscilia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Almost no members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, but several are known from inscriptions.

References

  1. CIL XIII, 1674, CIL XIII, 1675.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CIL X, 3699.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Kajanto, "The Significance of Non-Latin Cognomina", p. 526.
  4. CIL XI, 3254.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 CIL VI, 1057.
  6. CIL XI, 710.
  7. CIL VI, 32627.
  8. AE 1992, 285.
  9. CIL XII, 2256, CIL XII, 2274.
  10. AE 1998, 543b, AE 1998, 543c.
  11. CIL VIII, 17337.
  12. 1 2 3 EDCS, 574.
  13. CIL XIII, 7978.
  14. CIL V, 2096
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Brusin, Inscriptiones Aquileiae, i. 677.
  16. CIL VI, 12489.
  17. 1 2 CIL XI, 6390.
  18. CIL V, 6518.
  19. CIL VIII, 26735, CIL VIII, 27359.
  20. CIL V, 708.
  21. 1 2 CIL V, 890.
  22. 1 2 3 4 CIL X, 4719.
  23. BCTH, 1954-169.
  24. CIL XIV, 3654.
  25. 1 2 CIL X, 6331
  26. 1 2 CIL XI, 3613.
  27. RIB, i. 525.
  28. AE 1979, 89.
  29. Inscriptiones Aquileiae, i. 680.
  30. CIL X, 4325.
  31. CIL VIII, 24980.
  32. MAD, 225.
  33. CIL X, 1403.
  34. BCTH, 1909-186.
  35. 1 2 CIL VIII, 12041.
  36. CIL XI, 4988.
  37. Šašel and Šašel, Inscriptiones Latinae quae in Iugoslavia, iii. 2885, 2886.
  38. AE 2010, 1151.
  39. CIL XI, 6206.
  40. CIL I, 2704.
  41. CIL X, 4852.
  42. CIL VI, 975.
  43. 1 2 3 CIL VI, 20792.
  44. Hispania Epigraphica, 2011, 369.
  45. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, i. 2075c.
  46. RIB, i. 537.
  47. 1 2 AE 2005, 465.
  48. CIL XV, 8236.
  49. AE 2013, 336.
  50. CIL XI, 7926, CIL XI, 7945.
  51. CIL I, 3068.
  52. CIL VI, 3711.
  53. CIL XI, 4125.
  54. CIL VIII, 5775.
  55. Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 2, 6624.
  56. CIL X, 6529.
  57. CIL VI, 2380.
  58. CIL VII, 327.
  59. AE 1892, 58, AE 1987, 736.
  60. AE 1972, 154.
  61. CIL VI, 41394.
  62. AE 1971, 402.
  63. CIL I, 2944.
  64. AE 1989, 549.
  65. Epigraphica, 2021–332.
  66. CIL III, 175, CIL III, 14165,05.
  67. CIL X, 2750, CIL XII, 201.
  68. AE 2005, 1255.
  69. AE 2006, 1862, AE 2008, 1195, AE 2012, 1957.
  70. CIL I, 2238.
  71. CIL X, 4727.
  72. CIL X, 3778.
  73. CIL III, 7369, CIL IX, 4417.
  74. CIL XIII, 1462, CIL XIII, 2608, CIL XIII, 2609.
  75. AE 1996, 1124.
  76. Kolb, Tituli Helvetici, 707, 7.
  77. CIL VI, 7829, CIL VI, 23675.
  78. AE 1988, 805.
  79. CIL VI, 23841.
  80. CIL VI, 8935, CIL VI, 24177.
  81. Teramo e la valle del Tordino, p. 219.
  82. CIL III, 7154, CIL VIII, 18065.
  83. CIL VIII, 26489.
  84. AE 1992, 458.
  85. CIL VI, 32919.
  86. Finke, "Neue Inschriften", 47.
  87. CIL VI, 29020, CIL IX, 3192, CIL IX, 3200, CIL IX, 3259.
  88. CIL IX, 8474, CIL XI, 4911.
  89. CIL XII, 3233.
  90. AE 2019, 237.
  91. Walser, Römische Inschriften in der Schweiz, iii. 305.
  92. AE 1992, 1379.
  93. CIL VI, 11171.
  94. CIL VI, 6986, CIL XIV, 2108.
  95. CIL V, 7035.
  96. AE 1936, 12.
  97. AE 1994, 559.
  98. CIL III, 247, CIL VI, 1764
  99. CIL V, 3268.
  100. CIL IX, 568.
  101. CIL VI, 38869.
  102. CIL XI, 7926.
  103. AE 1988, 504.
  104. AE 1964, 219b, AE 2014, 1019.
  105. CIL III, 10005, CIL V, 861.
  106. AE 1995, 139, CIL VI, 9455.
  107. CIL XIV, 3381.
  108. NSA, 1901-194.
  109. AE 1976, 176.
  110. NSA, 1918-127.
  111. AE 2012, 1074.
  112. CIL III, 4816.
  113. CIL II, 3433.
  114. CIL V, 8130.
  115. AE 1983, 367.
  116. CIL XI, 8113,20.
  117. CIL XII, 5159.
  118. 1 2 Caesar, De Bello Gallico, iii. 7.
  119. CIL VI, 31865
  120. CIL XIII, 2921.
  121. CIL VIII, 8164.
  122. CIL VI, 37711, CIL IX, 587.
  123. AE 1996, 555.
  124. CIL XI, 4988.
  125. NSA, 1923-373.
  126. Tacitus, Annales, vi. 2.
  127. CIL XIV, 4936, CIL V, 7113.
  128. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, i. 2419.
  129. CIL XI, 1257.
  130. CIL XI, 6184.
  131. CIL XIII, 1683.
  132. CIL V, 4001.
  133. CIL V, 2438.
  134. CIL II, 3542.
  135. Hispania Epigraphica, 2003/04, 385.
  136. AE 1975, 625.
  137. Archeologia Classica, 1998-414.
  138. AE 1961, 277.
  139. CIL VIII, 10601.
  140. CIL V, 6132.
  141. CIL IX, 4171
  142. CIL VIII, 6666.
  143. NSA, 1897-64.
  144. CIL XIII, 1999.
  145. Hirtius, De Bello Alexandrino, 42.
  146. Solin, "Die Wandinschriften im sog(enannten) Haus des M. Fabius Rufus", 66.
  147. CIL VI, 28400.
  148. CIL IX, 3386.
  149. CIL IX, 4092.
  150. CIL X, 4797, CIL X, 4819.
  151. AE 2008, 387.
  152. CIL IV, 2014, CIL XI, 4778.
  153. AE 1989, 201.
  154. Livy, xxvi. 33, 34.
  155. CIL VI, 28636.
  156. Caesar, De Bello Africo, 64.
  157. CIL VI, 22311.
  158. CIL VI, 17154.
  159. AE 1988, 482.
  160. Varro, De Lingua Latina, v. 55.
  161. Livy, iii. 13, 24, 25, 29.
  162. CIL XI, 3691.
  163. CIL VI, 35898.

Bibliography