Caecilia gens

Last updated
Lucius Caecilius Jucundus, a Pompeian banker. Lucius Caecilius Iucundus, plaster cast of Roman bronze and marble original, House of Caecilius Iucundus (V-i-26), Pompeii, c. 79 AD, National Archaeological Museum, Naples - Spurlock Museum, UIUC - DSC05672 (cropped).jpg
Lucius Caecilius Jucundus, a Pompeian banker.

The gens Caecilia was a plebeian [lower-roman 1] family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned in history as early as the fifth century BC, but the first of the Caecilii who obtained the consulship was Lucius Caecilius Metellus Denter, in 284 BC. [1] [2] The Caecilii Metelli were one of the most powerful families of the late Republic, from the decades before the First Punic War down to the time of Augustus.

Contents

Origin

Like other Roman families in the later times of the Republic, the Caecilii traced their origin to a mythical personage, Caeculus, the founder of Praeneste. He was said to be the son of Vulcan, and engendered by a spark; a similar story was told of Servius Tullius. He was exposed as an infant, but preserved by his divine father, and raised by maidens. He grew up amongst the shepherds, and became a highwayman. Coming of age, he called upon the people of the countryside to build a new town, convincing them with the aid of a miracle. An alternative tradition claimed that the Caecilii were descended from Caecas, one of the companions of Aeneas, who came with him to Italy after the sack of Troy. [3] [4] [5] [1] [6] [7]

Praenomina

The praenomina used by the Caecilii during the Republic are Lucius , Quintus , Gaius , and Marcus . Titus appears only towards the very end of the Republic, and is not known to have been used by the great house of the Caecilii Metelli.

Branches and cognomina

The cognomina of this gens under the Republic are Bassus, Denter, Cornutus, Metellus, Niger, and Rufus, of which the Metelli are the best known. From the consulship of Lucius Caecilius Metellus Denter, the family of the Metelli became one of the most distinguished at Rome. In the latter half of the second century BC, it obtained an extraordinary number of the highest offices of the state. Quintus Metellus, who was consul in 143 BC, had four sons, who were raised to the consulship in succession; and his brother, Lucius Metellus, who was consul in 142, had two sons, who were likewise elevated to the same dignity.

The Metelli were distinguished as a family for their unwavering support of the party of the Optimates. The etymology of their name is quite uncertain. Festus connects it, probably from mere similarity of sound, with mercenarii. The history of the family is very difficult to trace, and in many parts conjectural. It is treated at length by Drumann. [8] [9] [10]

The victory of the consul L. Caecilius Metellus against Hasdrubal's elephants at Panormus in 251 seems to have left a durable impression on the Caecili Metelli, as many of them featured an elephant on the coins they minted. In fact, elephants are so often used on their coins that it might have become their emblem. [11]

Members

This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.

Caecilii Metelli

Denarius of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius, 81 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Pietas, alluding to the agnomen, Pius. The elephant on the reverse commemorates the capture of Carthaginian elephants by Lucius Caecilius Metellus at Panormus in 251 BC. Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius.jpg
Denarius of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius, 81 BC. The obverse depicts a head of Pietas, alluding to the agnomen, Pius. The elephant on the reverse commemorates the capture of Carthaginian elephants by Lucius Caecilius Metellus at Panormus in 251 BC.
Denarius of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio, c. 46 BC. The obverse depicts the head of Jupiter. The elephant on the reverse may also allude to Africa, since the coin was minted there before the Battle of Thapsus. Metellus Scipio denarius.jpg
Denarius of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio, c.46 BC. The obverse depicts the head of Jupiter. The elephant on the reverse may also allude to Africa, since the coin was minted there before the Battle of Thapsus.

Caecilii Dentri

Denarius of Gaius Caecilius Metellus Caprarius, 125 BC. The reverse depicts the triumph of his ancestor Lucius Caecilius Metellus, with the elephants he had captured at the Battle of Panormus. C. Caecilius Metellus Caprarius, denarius, 125 BC, RRC 269-1.jpg
Denarius of Gaius Caecilius Metellus Caprarius, 125 BC. The reverse depicts the triumph of his ancestor Lucius Caecilius Metellus, with the elephants he had captured at the Battle of Panormus.

Caecilii Cornuti

Others

Footnotes

  1. The appearance of Titus Caecilius, a patrician consular tribune for the year 444 BC in Livy, is a false reading for Titus Cloelius.

See also

Related Research Articles

The gens Sulpicia was one of the most ancient patrician families at ancient Rome, and produced a succession of distinguished men, from the foundation of the Republic to the imperial period. The first member of the gens who obtained the consulship was Servius Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus, in 500 BC, only nine years after the expulsion of the Tarquins, and the last of the name who appears on the consular list was Sextus Sulpicius Tertullus in AD 158. Although originally patrician, the family also possessed plebeian members, some of whom may have been descended from freedmen of the gens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Licinia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Licinia was a celebrated plebeian family at ancient Rome, which appears from the earliest days of the Republic until imperial times, and which eventually obtained the imperial dignity. The first of the gens to obtain the consulship was Gaius Licinius Calvus Stolo, who, as tribune of the plebs from 376 to 367 BC, prevented the election of any of the annual magistrates, until the patricians acquiesced to the passage of the lex Licinia Sextia, or Licinian Rogations. This law, named for Licinius and his colleague, Lucius Sextius, opened the consulship for the first time to the plebeians. Licinius himself was subsequently elected consul in 364 and 361 BC, and from this time, the Licinii became one of the most illustrious gentes in the Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Junia or Iunia was one of the most celebrated families of ancient Rome. The gens may originally have been patrician, and was already prominent in the last days of the Roman monarchy. Lucius Junius Brutus was the nephew of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the seventh and last king of Rome, and on the expulsion of Tarquin in 509 BC, he became one of the first consuls of the Roman Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pompeia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Pompeia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, first appearing in history during the second century BC, and frequently occupying the highest offices of the Roman state from then until imperial times. The first of the Pompeii to obtain the consulship was Quintus Pompeius in 141 BC, but by far the most illustrious of the gens was Gnaeus Pompeius, surnamed Magnus, a distinguished general under the dictator Sulla, who became a member of the First Triumvirate, together with Caesar and Crassus. After the death of Crassus, the rivalry between Caesar and Pompeius led to the Civil War, one of the defining events of the final years of the Roman Republic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Marcia, occasionally written Martia, was one of the oldest and noblest houses at ancient Rome. They claimed descent from the second and fourth Roman Kings, and the first of the Marcii appearing in the history of the Republic would seem to have been patrician; but all of the families of the Marcii known in the later Republic were plebeian. The first to obtain the consulship was Gaius Marcius Rutilus in 357 BC, only a few years after the passage of the lex Licinia Sextia opened this office to the plebeians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minucia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Minucia was an ancient Roman family, which flourished from the earliest days of the Republic until imperial times. The gens was apparently of patrician origin, but was better known by its plebeian branches. The first of the Minucii to hold the consulship was Marcus Minucius Augurinus, elected consul in 497 BC.

The gens Aelia, occasionally written Ailia, was a plebeian family in Rome, which flourished from the fifth century BC until at least the third century AD, a period of nearly eight hundred years. The archaic spelling Ailia is found on coins, but must not be confused with Allia, which is a distinct gens. The first member of the family to obtain the consulship was Publius Aelius Paetus in 337 BC.

Lucius Caecilius Metellus was a Roman aristocrat. He was praetor in 71 BC. He succeeded Gaius Verres as governor of Sicily in 70 BC. He died in office as consul in 68 BC. His co-consul was Quintus Marcius Rex.

Gaius Caecilius Metellus Caprarius was a consul of the Roman Republic in 113 BC with Gnaeus Papirius Carbo. He served under Scipio Aemilianus in Numantia around 133 BC. He was praetor in 117 BC. His proconsulship in Thrace in 112–111 BC earned him a triumph. He was censor in 102 BC with his cousin, Quintus Caecilius Metellus Numidicus.

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Creticus was a politically active member of the Roman upper class. He was praetor in 74 BC and pontifex from 73 BC until his death. He was consul in 69 BC along with Quintus Hortensius Hortalus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antonia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Antonia was a Roman family of great antiquity, with both patrician and plebeian branches. The first of the gens to achieve prominence was Titus Antonius Merenda, one of the second group of Decemviri called, in 450 BC, to help draft what became the Law of the Twelve Tables. The most prominent member of the gens was Marcus Antonius.

The gens Titia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. The gens is rarely mentioned in the Republican period, and did not rise out of obscurity till a very late time. None of its members obtained the consulship under the Republic, and the first person of the name who held this office was Marcus Titius in BC 31.

The gens Cluvia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, known from the later Republic, and early imperial times. The first member of the gens to achieve prominence was Gaius Cluvius Saxula, praetor in 175 and 173 BC.

The gens Fannia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, which first appears in history during the second century BC. The first member of this gens to attain the consulship was Gaius Fannius Strabo, in 161 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sosia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Sosia, occasionally written Sossia, was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens occur in history from the end of the Republic down to the third century AD. The first of the Sosii to attain the consulship was Gaius Sosius in 32 BC, and the family would continue holding various positions in the Roman state until the third century.

The gens Hortensia was an ancient plebeian family in Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned in the fifth century BC, but from that time somewhat infrequently until the final century of the Republic. The most illustrious of the gens was the orator Quintus Hortensius, a man of great learning, and a contemporary of Cicero. Under the Empire they seem to have sunk back into obscurity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juventia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Juventia, occasionally written Jubentia, was an ancient plebeian family at Rome. After centuries of obscurity, the gens emerges into history with the appearance of Titus Juventius, a military tribune, in the beginning of the second century BC. The first of the Juventii to obtain the consulship was Marcus Juventius Thalna in 163 BC. But the family is renowned less for its statesmen than for its jurists, who flourished during the second century AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Munatia gens</span>

The gens Munatia was a plebeian family at Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned during the second century BC, but they did not obtain any of the higher offices of the Roman state until imperial times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opimia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Opimia, also written Opeimia on coins, was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned during the time of the Samnite Wars, and they are mentioned in Roman historians from then down to the end of the Republic. The first of the Opimii to obtain the consulship was Quintus Opimius in 154 BC.

References

  1. 1 2 Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, p. 526 ("Caecilia Gens").
  2. Livy, iv. 7.
  3. Festus, s. v. Caeculus.
  4. Servius, vii. 678.
  5. Solinus, ii. 9.
  6. Hartung, Die Religion der Römer, vol. i, pp. 88 ff.
  7. Klausen, Aeneas und die Penaten, pp. 761 ff.
  8. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, pp. 1055, 1056 ("Metellus").
  9. Festus, p. 146 (ed. Müller).
  10. Drumann, Geschichte Roms, vol. ii, pp. 17–58.
  11. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 287, 288, 292, 293, 387, 388, 390, 471.
  12. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 390.
  13. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 471.
  14. Polybius, i. 39, 40.
  15. Livy, xxiv. 18, 43.
  16. Valerius Maximus, ii. 9. § 7.
  17. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 260, 261 (note 2), 264.
  18. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 531–533 (note 1).
  19. RE III.1 (1897), col. 1234 ('Caecilius 132')
  20. RE, vol. III (1), col. 1208; supplement III, col. 222 (Caecilius 85).
  21. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 26, 30 (note 7), 41, 45 (note 5); vol. III, p. 37.
  22. Waterfield, Plutarch: Roman Lives, p. 481.
  23. Drumann, Geschichte Roms, ii. 57.
  24. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, xv. 21. § 2.
  25. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, ii. 1. § 1.
  26. Plutarch, "The Life of Caesar", 35, "The Life of Pompeius", 62.
  27. Cassius Dio, xli. 17.
  28. Appian, Bellum Civile, ii. 41.
  29. Caesar, De Bello Civili, i. 33.
  30. Lucan, iii. 114 ff.
  31. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, x. 4, 8.
  32. Cassius Dio, lv. 30.
  33. Fasti Capitolini , AE 1927, 101; 1940, 59, 60.
  34. Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 292, 293.
  35. Livy, xxxix. 56, xl. 1.
  36. Livy, xlii. 6.
  37. RE, vol. iii.1, col. 1200; supplement i, col. 267 (Caecilius 44).
  38. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 26, 30 (note 2), 31 (note 13), 36, 43, 45 (note 11).
  39. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, i. 14.
  40. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 179, 200, 210.
  41. B. M. Levick in Cornell, Fragments, vol. I, pp. 426–428; vol. II, pp. 848–851; vol. III, p. 519. Levick writes that Marcus Caecilius Cornutus, the Arval of 21 BC is another, but less likely possibility.
  42. Broughton, vol. II, p. 338.
  43. Rüpke, Fasti Sacerdotum, pp. 578, 579.
  44. Tacitus, Annales, iv. 28.
  45. Rüpke, Fasti Sacerdotum, p. 579.
  46. Pliny the Elder, vii. 74.
  47. Livy, iv. 16.
  48. Cicero, Divinatio in Caecilium.
  49. Cicero, Pro Sulla, 22, 23; Post Reditum in Senatu, 9; Pro Milone 14; Epistulae ad Quintum Fratrem, iii. 3. § 2.
  50. Asconius Pedianus, In Ciceronis Pro Milone, p. 48 (ed. Orelli).
  51. Quintus Tullius Cicero, De Petitione Consulatus, 2.
  52. Asconius Pedianus, In Ciceronis In Toga Candida, 84 (ed. Orelli).
  53. Cornelius Nepos, The Life of Atticus, 5.
  54. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, i. 1, 12, ii. 19, 20, iii. 20.
  55. Caesar, De Bello Civili, i. 46.
  56. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, xi. 23, xii. 52, xiii. 7.
  57. 1 2 Appian, Bellum Civile, ii. 113, 117.
  58. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, xv. 17, xvi. 4.
  59. Drumann, Geschichte Roms, vol. iii, 2nd ed. (ed. P. Groebe, 1906), pp. 632, 633
  60. Shackleton Bailey 1976, p. 105.
  61. Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum, iv. 15.
  62. Pliny the Elder, xxviii. 57.
  63. Tacitus, Historiae, ii. 60, iii. 68.
  64. Cassius Dio, lxv. 17.
  65. Cassius Dio, lxvii. 13.
  66. Suetonius, "The Life of Domitian", 8.
  67. Pliny the Younger, Epistulae, iii. 8.
  68. Alföldy, Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter der Antoninen, pp. 202 ff.
  69. CIL III, 5182
  70. Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, i. 13.
  71. Minucius Felix, Octavius.
  72. Bähr, Die Christlich-Römische Theologie, § 19.

Bibliography